Vol. 87, No. 1, 1979
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
BIOCHEMICAL
Pages 25-31
March 15, 1979
13C NMR STUDIES OF THE BINDINGOFSOYBEAN Michael Contribution California Received
TRYPSIN INHIBITOR
W. Hunkapiller, Michael D. Forgac, and John H. Richards
Ellen
TO TRYPSIN Ho Yu
15952, Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125
January
17,1979
of the complex between trypsin and soybean trypsin SUMMARY : NMR studies inhibitor with l-13C-arginine and modified inhibitor with 1-13C-lysine show that these complexes involve almost exclusively non-covalent binding of the inhibitor to the enzyme for trypsinf 13C-Lys-inhibitor at pH 6.5 and 8.1 and At pH 7.1 for trypsin/13C-Argfor trypsin/13C-Arg-inhibitor at pH 5.0. inhibitor both non-covalent and acyl enzyme forms are observed. Under no conditions did we observe evidence for a tetrahedral adduct between enzyme and inhibitor. INTRODUCTION Soybean hibitors
trypsin
found
lecular
of 22,000
of 10' M-l
amide
trypsin
under
support
the view
of the
simple
an analogue
the hydroxyl the complex
group exist
with
(2).
(1).
These
constant
decreasing
64 which
pH.
inhibitors
form much more stable
ST1
can be cleaved
and many other
trypsin
in-
ST1 has a mo-
an association
with
arg 63 and ile
by
observations
function
complexes
as sub-
with
the
(3).
interactions
Michaelis
tissues
rapidly
in the molecular
enzyme and the peptide
involve
complex
substrates
question
to trypsin
occurring
however,
is one of many proteinase
and plant
conditions naturally
which,
been the nature
plex
that
(STI)
Ka decreases
bond between
do normal
A central
of the
and binds
appropriate
analogues
enzyme than
of animal
at pH 8.0;
has a reactive
strate
(Kunitz)
in a variety
weight
(K,)
inhibitor
function
between
bond between binding
the residues arg
between
of the acyl-enzyme
adduct
inhibitors
has
at the catalytic
63 and ile
64:
with
carbon
in which
an ester
of arg
the hydroxyl
site
does the com-
enzyme and inhibitor
intermediate
of ser 195 and the carbonyl as a tetrahedral
of these
(4);
is
the
bond between
63 (5), group
or does of ser
T/ST1 = trypsinlsoybean trypsin inhibitor complex. STI-Arg* = ST1 with arg 63 replaced by 1-13C-Arg. STI-Lys* = ST1 with arg 63 replaced by l-13C-Lys. 0006-291X/79/050025-07$01.00/0 25
Copyright All rights
@ 1979 by Academic Press, Inc. of reproduction in anyform reserved.
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 87, No. 1, 1979
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
195 of the enzyme has been added across the carbonyl group of the peptide bond (6,7)? In this work we have used cmr to probe this question by observing the T/ST1 complex in which arg 63 of ST1 has been replaced either with 1-13C-arg (T/STI-Arg*)
or l-l3 C-lys (T/STI-Lys*)
(8).
MATERIALSANDMETHODS Materials Carbon-13 labeled KCN (90% enriched) was purchased from Merck, Sharp and Dohme. Soybean trypsin inhibitor was obtained from Gallard-Schlesinger Chemical Corp. Lyophilized bovine trypsin (lot TRL 34B884) was purchased from Worthington Biochemical Corp. CPase B was purified from the acetone powder extract of porcine ancrease (Pancreatin Grade II and III from Sigma), as described (9). 1-l s C-Arginine (10) and l- 13C-lysine (11) were prepared by published procedures. Preparation of the Complex Between Trypsin and 1-13C-Arginine of l-13CLysine Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor. gnzymic replacement of the arg 63 residue in the reactive site of soybean trypsin inhibitor by l-13C-arginine or l-13Clysine followed the published procedure (8). Methods Carbon-13 nmr spectra A Varian XL-loo-15 nmr spectrometer operating at 25.14 M8z in the FT modewas used to record the cmr spectra. In general, spectra were recorded with the following parameters: 6000 Hz sweepwidth, 0.2 set acquisition time, and 90' pulse (at 60 usec). Proton noise decoupling was used. Digital line broadening of 6 Hz, corresponding to a sensitivity enhancement of 0.05, was applied to the FID before Fourier transformation. Temperature of the probe was 31-32OC. Difference spectra were obtained by computer subtracting a cmr spectrum of unlabeled T/STI complex taken at pH 7.2 from each cmr spectrum of the labeled complexes. (The 13C-natural abundance spectrum of the T/STI complex does not change observably in the range pH 3-8.) The difference spectra program was provided by Dr. S. H. Smallcombeof Varian Associates. Sample preparation Generally, solutions of T/ST1 complex (l-2mM) were madeup in 0.2M KC1 and transferred to a 12 mmnmr tube fitted with vortex plugs and a D20 locking capillary. The pH's of the solutions were measuredwith a Radiometer Model PM 26 pH meter. Adjustment of pH was done with either lN HCl or 1N NaOH.
RESULTSANDDISCUSSION Figure 1 shows 13C difference 6.5 and 3.0.
spectra for T/STI-Lys*
Figure 2 showsdifference
A formal difference
obtained at pH 8.1,
spectra for T/STI-Arg*
spectrum of T/STI-Arg*
26
at 7.1 and 5.0.
at pH 3.0 was not obtained, but the
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 87, No. 1, 1979
I
I 190
I
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
1
I
I 150
I
FROM
TMS
170 PPM
I
I 130
I
L
110
spectra of trypsin/soybean trypsin inhibitor Figure 1. The cmr difference complex (carbon-13 enriched at C-l carbon of lys-64 of STI): spectrum taken at pH (A) 8.1; (b) 6.5; and (c) 3.0. Sweep width is 2500 Hz.
13C spectrum natural
abundance
shifts C-l
of the
of the
resonances
of arginine
near
trast Lys*
should
pH where
and T/STI-Arg*
have
observed near
difference
to the single
of significant
of unenriched
and lysine
neutral
The positions
shows a peak at 177.5
spectrum
A significant ent
complex
T/STI.
for
T/STI-Lys*.
show only
a single
resonance..
l3 C resonances
of tetrahedral
a 13C chemical
shift
I lists
near
in the
the chemical as well
and T/STI-Arg*
shows two resolved
seen for
amounts
absent
and TISTI-Arg*
the T/STI-Lys*
resonance
of the
is
as for
pH.
between T/STI-Arg*
Table
T/STI-Lys*
neutral
ppm which
for adduct. that
27
for
13C resonances
At acidic
the complex
is appar-
pH both
eliminate
in conT/STI-
the presence
Such a tetrahedral
species
C-l
such as
of a substance
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 87, No. 1, 1979
I
I
I
I
190
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
I
I
170
PPM
Figure 2. The cmr difference complex (carbon-13 enriched at pH (A) 7.1 and (B) 5.0.
Table I: Arginine
I
FROM
Carbon-13 Chemical and Lysine, Free
for Active
the C-l Carbon Site of STI.
I!!
175.7
T/STI-Lys*
T/STI-Arg* P.P!!! 173.3,
174.9.t
I?!!
PE!!
8.1
175.2
5.0
174.8
6.5
175.2
2.9
177.5
3.0
177.6
A single resonance for T/STI-Arg* independently (D. E. Neves, J. L. Laskowski, Abstract submitted for Markley for informing us of these tion.
methane
at 94.2
170-180
ppm which
amide,
or carboxyl
which ppm (12). is
of
Is!!!!
6.8
175.5
I!!!
orthoformate
L
TMs
Shifts and in
PLP!!
6.0
ethyl
I 110
Lysine
-PB
t
I
spectra of trypsin/soybean trypsin inhibitor at C-l carbon of arg-64 of STI): spectrum taken Spectrum width is 2500 Hz,
Arginine
7.1
I 130
150
falls These
characteristic
groups
at 127.2 positions for
(13).
28
at 174.7 ppm has been observed Markley, M. E. Welch and M. 1979 FASEB). We thank Professor results prior to their publica-
ppm (12) are trigonal
or even, far
removed carbonyl
possibly, from carbons
dimethoxythe region in ester,
of
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 87, No. 1, 1979
Three (i)
possibilities
intact
amide
non-covalent
remain
bond
for
in a native
Michaelis
complex; complex
Michaelis
the 64-65
bond has been hydrolyzed;
as a carboxylic We identify
2.9 and at 177.6 acids
probably
acid
the bonding inhibitor
(ii)
covalent,
exist
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
which
an acyl
between
trypsin C-l
present
of arginine
for
at pH 3 as arising
changes
pH 3 (a downfield
shift
of 2.0 ppm for
T/STI-Arg*
cmr studies
of many peptides
(14,lS)
that in
with the
complex
a modified
dissociates
ppm, which
suggesting covalent tween
arg
between slow
this
enzyme and inhibitor
basis,
acyl
and amides lower
field
we tentatively native
in which with
of these
T/STI-Arg*
between
pH the
for
inhibitor
with
the observed a tetrahedral
(i)
a non-
amide
bond be-
an ester
two forms
shifts
at 174.9
for
(7b)
are
in
generally On
ppm to the non-covalent signal
at 173.3
non-covalent the X-ray
might
exists
of carbonyl
esters.
Possible
29
group
of the corresponding
density
maps have been recognized
and ester
of amides
of both
adduct.
ppm and
those
account
electron
largely
at 173.3
in which These
and enzyme and the
may also
evidence
exists
of
an intact
chemical
the signal
The presence
T/STI-Lys*)
inhibitor
an amide
enzyme form
those
pH and
previous
as a mixture
Although
than
anions.
neutral
and of 1.9 for
in the same range,
assign
enzyme complex. for
fall
at pH
of carboxylic
and confirm
exists
an acyl
scale.
then
of the corresponding
and arg 63 of inhibitor.
on the nmr time
between
consistent tion
between
at somewhat
complexes (6,7)
complex
64 and (ii)
from C-l
complexes
appropriate
pH, T/STI-Arg*
63 and ile
would
T/STI-Arg*
shows two resonances
at this
of esters
complex the
in the range
ser 195 of trypsin
carbons
complex
in which
64 bond has been hydrolyzed.
that,
exchange
occur
fall
the
the arg 63-ile
Near pH 7, the T/STI-Arg* 174.9
for
at low pH at which
form in which
lysine)
ppm for
amounts
The pH dependent
accord
a non-
inhibitor
(or
at 177.5
small
we observe
and (iii)
in a
anion.
observed
with
complexes:
to the trypsin
enzyme species
the resonances
in equilibrium
is held
and a modified
or carboxylate
T/STI-Lys*
in the T/ST1
and acyl diffraction
be interpreted
ambiguities and X-ray
ppm to
studies
in
enzyme results
as being interpretaof the
complex
Vol. 87, No. 1, 1979
BIOCHEMICAL
between anhydrotrypsin
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
and bovine trypsin
carbonyl carbon of Lys 15 is distorted
inhibitor
pyramidally
it and ser 195 OY is too great for significant
(6b) suggest that the butthatthe
covalent bond formation.
(Another formal possibility
is that the two signals reflect
conformations of T/STI-Arg*
which interconvert
Comparison between C-l of free arginine intact
inhibitor
(174.9) shows an upfield
of free arginine as an internal lysine into the T/STI-Lys*
shifts
two distinct
slowly on the nmr time scale.) (175.5 ppm) and T/STI-Arg*
shift
with
of 0.6 ppmon incorporation
residue in the inhibitor.
complex shows an upfield
175.7 ppm in free lysine to 175.2 in the complex). upfield
distance between
shift
Incorporation
of
of 0.5 ppm (from
These values agree with
of 1.5kl.O ppm (14) and 0.8 to 1.9 ppm (15) observed for C-l
of amino acids upon incorporation At pH 5 in both TISTI-Lys*
into internal and T/STI-Arg*
positions in peptides. we observed only a single
resonance for the complex at a position assigned to the intact a non-covalent Michaelis complex with trypsin.
inhibitor
in
A recent study found s 10%
of the acyl enzyme form present in T/ST1 at pH 5.2 (16).
This is consistent
with our observation of the acyl enzyme form at neutral pH and its apparent absence in the cmr spectrum at pH 5.0 as 10% acyl enzyme is just below our observational
limits.
We observe only one resonance, characteristic T/STI-Lys*
indicating
covalently
bound amide over the pH range 5-8.
that this complex exists almost exclusively
for arginine modifies the molecular details hibitor
of an amide carbonyl,
and enzyme even though this substitution
as non-
Thus, the substitution
of the interaction causes little
for
of lysine
between inperturbation
in the thermodynamics of binding (8).
Acknowledgement: This work was supported by NIH grants GM10218 and GM16424.
30
Vol. 87, No. 1, 1979
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
REFERENCES 1. 2. 3.
4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16.
Laskowski, Jr., M., and Sealock, R. (1971) The Enzymes, Vol. III, pp. 375-473, Boyer, P. B., Ed., Academic Press, New York. Niekamp, C.-W., Hixon, Jr., H. F., and Laskowski, Jr., M. (1969) Biochemistry, 8, 16-22. Finkenstadt, W. R., Hamid, M. A., Mattis, J. A., Schrode, J., Sealock, R. W., and Wang, D. (1974) Proteinase Inhibitors, Bayer Symposium V, pp. 389-411, Fritz, H., Tschesche, Il., Green, L. J., and Trsucheit, E., Eds., Springer-Verlag, Berlin. Means, G. E., Ryan, D. S., Feeney, R. E. (1974) Acct. Chem. Res., 7, 315-320. Hixon, Jr., H. F., and Laskowski, Jr., M. (1970) J. Biol. Chem., 3, 2027-2035. a) Ruhlmann, D., Kukla, D., Schwager, P., Bartels, K., and Huber, R. (1973) J. Biol. Biol., 77, 417-436. b) Huber, R., Bode, W., Kukla, D ., Kohl, U., and Ryan, C. A. (1975) Biophys. Struct. Mech. 1, 189-201. a) Blow, D. M., Janin, J., and Sweet, R. M. (1974) Nature 249, 54-57. b) Sweet, R. M., Wright, H. T., Janin, J., Chothia, C. H., and Blow, D. M. (1974) Biochemistry, 13, 4212-4228. Sealock, R. W., and Laskowski, Jr., M. (1969) Biochemistry 8, 3703-3710. Folk, J. E. (1970) Methods in Enzymology Vol. XIX, pp. 504-508, Perlmann, G. E., and Lorand, L., Eds., ALademic Press, New York. Pichat, L., Guermont, J. P., and Liem, P. N. (1968) J. Labelled Compounds, Vol. IV, pp. 251-255. Rogers, A. O., Emmick, R. D., Tyran, L. W., Phillips, L. B., Levine, A. A ., and Scott, N. D. (1949) J. Amer. Chem. Sot., 11, 1837-1839. Stothers, J. B. (1972) Carbon-13 NMR Spectroscopy, pp. 138-144, Academic Press, New York. G. L. (1972) Carbon-13 Nuclear Magnetic ResoLevy, G. C., and Nelson, nance for Organic Chemists, pp. 110-123, Wiley-Interscience, New York. Christl, M., and Roberts, J. D. (1972) J. Amer. Chem. Sot., 94, 45644573. Gurd, F. R. N., Lawson, P. J., Cochran, D. W., and Wenkert, E. (1971) J. Biol. Chem. 246, 3725-3730. I. E. (1977) Biochemistry I&, 2474-2478. Huang, J. S., and Liener,
31