Accepted Manuscript Title: Evaluation of the Bio-Rad Geenius HIV-1/2 test as a confirmatory assay Author: Isabel Montesinos Joelle Eykmans Marie-Luce Delforge PII: DOI: Reference:

S1386-6532(14)00177-2 http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.jcv.2014.04.025 JCV 3025

To appear in:

Journal of Clinical Virology

Received date: Revised date: Accepted date:

7-3-2014 29-4-2014 30-4-2014

Please cite this article as: Montesinos I, Eykmans J, Evaluation of the Bio-Rad Geenius HIV-1/2 test as a confirmatory assay, Journal of Clinical Virology (2014), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2014.04.025 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

1

Title Page

2 3

Evaluation of the Bio-Rad Geenius HIV-1/2 test as a confirmatory assay

ip t

4 Authors:

6

1. Montesinos, Isabel. MD PhD. Microbiology Department. Erasmus Hospital. Route de

7

Lennik 808. 1070 Brussels, Belgium.

8

e-mail: [email protected]

9

2. Eykmans, Joelle. Microbiology Department. Erasmus Hospital. Route de Lennik 808.

an

us

cr

5

1070 Brussels, Belgium.

11

e-mail: Joelle.Eykmans@ erasme.ulb.ac.be

12

3. Delforge, Marie-Luce, MD. AIDS Reference Laboratory. Microbiology Department.

13

Erasmus Hospital. Route de Lennik 808. 1070 Brussels, Belgium.

14

e-mail: Marie-Luce.Delforge@ erasme.ulb.ac.be

15

te

d

M

10

Corresponding author:

17

Montesinos, Isabel. MD PhD. Microbiology Department. Erasmus Hospital. Route de

18

Lennik 808. 1070 Brussels, Belgium.

19

e-mail: [email protected]

20

Telephone number: 003225558102

Ac ce p

16

21 22

Short communication: 1263 words

23 24 25 26 1

Page 1 of 11

26

Evaluation of the Bio-Rad Geenius HIV-1/2 test as a confirmatory assay

27

Authors: Montesinos I, Eykmans J, Delforge ML

28

Highlights :

cr

 Geenius HIV1/2 is evaluated in comparison with MP HIV BLOT 2.2  Geenius HIV1/2 confirmatory system represents a reliable alternative to other confirmatory assays in HIV testing algorithm.  Geenius HIV1/2 assay was markedly less time consuming, allowed full traceability, automatic reading and interpretation

us

30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37

ip t

29

an

38 Abstract:

40

Objectives: We have evaluated the recently CE-marked Bio-Rad Geenius HIV1/2 as a

41

rapid and simple alternative to Western Blot for confirmation of HIV screening results.

42

Methods: A total of 160 serum samples were tested: 44 HIV-1 reactive samples by a 4th

43

generation Murex HIV Ag/Ab and/or Vidas HIV Duo Ultra, 5 HIV-2 reactive samples, 15

44

HIV-1 non-B subtype samples and 11 confirmed HIV-1 early seroconversion samples, 72

45

nonreactive samples, 8 indeterminate samples by MP HIV BLOT 2.2 confirmed negative

46

after follow up, 5 low reactive samples by EIA negative by MP HIV BLOT 2.2. The

47

samples were tested according to the manufacturer’s guidelines.

48

Results: Overall sensitivity for Bio-Rad Geenius HIV1/2 assay was 92%. Five out of 11

49

early seroconversion samples were tested positive, 4 negative and 2 indeterminate. All

50

HIV-1 non-B subtype samples were tested positive. Two out of the 5 HIV-2 reactive

51

samples were tested positive HIV-2, 2 positive HIV-2 with HIV-1 cross reaction, and 1

52

HIV positive untypable. After excluding early seroconversion samples, the sensitivity of

53

Bio-Rad Geenius HIV1/2 assay reached 100%. Overall specificity was 96%. All HIV

Ac ce p

te

d

M

39

2

Page 2 of 11

negative serums by 4th generation EIA were tested negative. All 5 low reactive samples

55

by EIA, negative by HIV BLOT 2.2 were tested negative by Bio-Rad Geenius HIV1/2. Two

56

out of the 8 indeterminate samples by MP HIV BLOT 2.2 that were confirmed negative

57

after follow up were tested indeterminate and one invalid, the other 5 were negative.

58

After excluding these last 13 samples, the specificity of Bio-Rad Geenius HIV1/2 assay

59

reached 100%. In comparison with MP HIV BLOT 2.2, the Bio-Rad Geenius HIV1/2

60

assay was markedly time saving, allowed full traceability, automatic reading and

61

interpretation.

62

Conclusions: The Bio-Rad Geenius HIV1/2 confirmatory system represents a reliable

63

alternative to other confirmatory assays in HIV testing algorithms and provides clear

64

improvement in quality management.

M

an

us

cr

ip t

54

65 Keywords:

67

HIV confirmatory tests; Geenius HIV1/2; HIV Western blot

68

Abbreviations:

69

WB: Western blot

70

Bio-Rad Geenius HIV1/2: Geenius

71

MP HIV BLOT 2.2: HIV BLOT 2.2

72

New LAV BLOT II: LAV BLOT II

73

Enzyme-immunoassay screening test: EIA

74

Bio-Rad Multispot HIV1/2: Multispot test

75

Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute: CLSI

76

Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention: CDC

77

Nucleic acid amplification test: NAAT

Ac ce p

te

d

66

78

3

Page 3 of 11

79 80 81

ip t

82 83

cr

84

us

85 86 Background and Objectives

88

The current laboratory diagnostic algorithm for HIV includes a supplemental assay, such

89

as the Western Blot (WB), to confirm the presence of antibodies and differentiate HIV-1

90

and HIV-2 on repeated reactive samples examined by a 4th generation enzyme-

91

immunoassay (EIA) screening test. WB testing takes several hours of technical time,

92

requires training and expertise in data interpretation. Moreover it may produce

93

indeterminate results and delay reporting, and may be misinterpreted in patients with

94

HIV-2 infection due to antigenic cross-reactivity (1, 2). A new diagnostic testing

95

algorithm has recently been proposed by the Centers for Diseases Control and

96

Prevention (CDC) taking into account testing efficiency, test complexity, turnaround

97

time and cost. In the new algorithm, specimens that are reactive on screening test are

98

subjected to an antibody test that differentiates HIV-1 from HIV-2 (3). We have evaluate

99

the recently CE-marked Bio-Rad Geenius HIV1/2 (Geenius) (Bio-Rad, Marnes-la-

100

Coquette, France), a single use immunochromatographic test, as a rapid and simple

101

alternative to MP HIV BLOT 2.2 (HIV BLOT 2.2) (MP Diagnostics, Ingbert, Germany) to

102

confirm the presence of antibodies and differentiate HIV-1 from HIV-2.

Ac ce p

te

d

M

an

87

4

Page 4 of 11

Methods: A total of 160 serum samples initially determined to be positive or negative

104

by a 4th generation Murex HIV Ag/Ab (Diasorin, Saluggia, Italy) (n=156) and/or Vidas

105

HIV Duo Ultra (bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Etoile, France) (n=78) were tested by Geenius test.

106

The diagnostic performance and the quality management (automated reader,

107

traceability and reporting features) of the test were assessed. Two sets of samples were

108

used to analyse assay diagnostic performances. A total of 75 serums were tested for

109

sensitivity: 44 HIV-1 reactive samples by EIA and HIV BLOT 2.2, 5 HIV-2 reactive

110

samples suspected by HIV BLOT 2.2 and confirmed by New LAV BLOT II, (LAV BLOT II)

111

(Bio-Rad, Marnes-la-Coquette, France), 15 HIV-1 non-B subtype samples (8 CRF02, 1

112

CRF01, 1 CRF11, 1 CRF15, 2 subtype G, 1 subtype F1, 1 subtype C) genotyped with

113

TRUGENE HIV-1 Genotyping Kit and OpenGene DNA Sequencing System (Visible

114

Genetics, Inc), and 11 confirmed HIV-1 early seroconversion samples by HIV testing

115

algorithm including detection of Agp24 (Innotest HIV Antigen mAb, Innogenetics, Gent,

116

Belgium). A total of 85 serums were tested for specificity: 72 nonreactive samples by 4th

117

generation EIA, 8 indeterminate samples by HIV BLOT 2.2 confirmed negative after

118

follow up (no evolution or non reactive result in a second sample), 5 low reactive

119

samples by EIA negative by HIV BLOT 2.2. The samples were tested according to the

120

manufacturer’s guidelines. Geenius cassettes were read and interpreted by an

121

automated reader by means of a proprietary algorithm.

122

Results: The sensitivity and specificity of Geenius are shown in Table 1.

123

Table 1: Sensitivity and specificity of Bio-Rad Geenius HIV1/2 Sensitivity Specificity 92%1 96%1 2 100% 100%3 1Overall sensitivity and specificity. 2Sensitivity excluding seroconversion samples. 3Specificity excluding samples low reactive by 4th generation EIA and confirmed negatives.

124 125 126

Ac ce p

te

d

M

an

us

cr

ip t

103

5

Page 5 of 11

Overall sensitivity for Geenius assay was 92% compared with 89% for the HIV BLOT 2.2.

128

All HIV-1 confirmed positive by HIV BLOT 2.2 were tested HIV-1 positive by Geenius

129

including HIV-1 non-B subtype samples. Five out of the 11 early seroconversion samples

130

were tested positive, 2 indeterminate and 4 negative by Geenius. By HIV BLOT 2.2 these

131

11 early seroconversion samples were tested as follow: 3 positive, 6 indeterminate and

132

2 negative (Table 2).

142 143

cr us an

1

Murex Ab/Ag1 12/35

Vidas Ab/Ag2 0/5

HIV Blot 2.2

Neg4

Ind

HIV p24 Ag (pg/mL) 1174

2

22/272

NP3

Ind5

Neg

>3000

3

0/211

0/5

Ind

Ind

>3000

4

0/59

NP

Neg

Ind

1531

5

3/107

0/5

Neg

Ind

2537

6

79/10

23/0

HIV-1

HIV-1

746

7

17/265

13/0

Neg

Neg

>3000

8

96/22

5/0

HIV-1

Ind

548

9

26/58

NP

HIV-1

Ind

>3000

10

101/14

18/0

HIV-1

HIV-1

359

11

90/11

NP

HIV-1

HIV-1

985

Ac ce p

Patients

1Index, 2Test

M

Geenius

d

Table 2: Seroconversion samples tests results

te

133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141

ip t

127

value, 3Not performed, 4Negative, 5Indeterminate

6

Page 6 of 11

After having excluded early seroconversion samples, the sensitivity of Geenius and HIV

145

BLOT 2.2 reached 100%. The ability to differentiate HIV-1 and HIV-2 by Geenius was as

146

follow: 2 out of the 5 HIV-2 reactive samples were tested positive HIV-2 (by HIV BLOT

147

2.2: HIV-1 indeterminate with HIV-2 specific band indicated; by LAV BLOT II HIV-2

148

positive), 2 positive HIV-2 with HIV-1 cross reaction (by HIV BLOT 2.2: HIV-1 positive

149

with HIV-2 specific band indicated; by LAV BLOT II HIV-2 positive), and 1 HIV positive

150

untypable (by HIV BLOT 2.2: HIV-1 positive with HIV-2 specific band indicated; by LAV

151

BLOT II HIV-2 positive). Overall specificity for the Geenius assay was 96%. All HIV

152

negative serums by 4th generation EIA were tested negative. All 5 low reactive samples

153

by EIA negative by HIV BLOT 2.2 were tested negative by Geenius. Two out of the 8

154

indeterminate samples by HIV BLOT 2.2 confirmed negative by follow-up were tested

155

indeterminate and one invalid while the other 5 were negative. After excluding these

156

last 13 samples, the specificity of Geenius assay reached 100%. In comparison with HIV

157

BLOT 2.2, the Geenius assay is markedly time saving (3000

Ind

Ind

>3000

4

0/59

NP

Neg

Ind

1531

5

3/107

0/5

Neg

Ind

2537

6

79/10

23/0

HIV-1

HIV-1

746

7

17/265

13/0

Neg

Neg

>3000

Ac ce p

Neg4

M

Patients

us

Table 2: Seroconversion samples tests results

d

235 236 237 238 239

Table 1: Sensitivity and specificity of Bio-Rad Geenius HIV1/2 Sensitivity Specificity 92%1 96%1 2 100% 100%3 1Overall sensitivity and specificity. 2Sensitivity excluding seroconversion samples. 3Specificity excluding samples low reactive by 4th generation EIA and confirmed negatives.

te

229 230 231 232 233 234

HIV Blot 2.2 Ind

HIV p24 Ag (pg/mL) 1174

8

96/22

5/0

HIV-1

Ind

548

9

26/58

NP

HIV-1

Ind

>3000

10

101/14

18/0

HIV-1

HIV-1

359

11

90/11

NP

HIV-1

HIV-1

985

1Index, 2Test

value, 3Not performed, 4Negative, 5Indeterminate

242 243 244 245

9.

11

Page 11 of 11

2 test as a confirmatory assay.

We have evaluated the recently Conformité Européenne (CE)-marked Bio-Rad Geenius human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)1/2 as a rapid and simple alternati...
98KB Sizes 4 Downloads 3 Views