Plant Physiology Preview. Published on April 20, 2015, as DOI:10.1104/pp.15.00321
1
RUNNING HEAD
2
CrDOF and the origin of photoperiodic flowering
3 4
CORRESPONDING AUTOR
5
Federico Valverde.
6
Institute for Plant Biochemistry and Photosynthesis. Plant Development Unit.
7
CSIC and Universidad de Sevilla. 49th Americo Vespucio Av., 41092 Seville,
8
SPAIN
9
Tel ++34 954 489525
10
E-mail:
[email protected] 11
Web:
12
metabolism
http://www.ibvf.csic.es/en/molecular-basis-flowering-photoperiod-and-
13 14 15 16
RESEARCH AREA Genes, Development and Evolution
17
1 Downloaded from www.plantphysiol.org on August 31, 2015 - Published by www.plant.org Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Copyright 2015 by the American Society of Plant Biologists
18
An evolutionarily conserved DOF-CONSTANS
19
module controls plant photoperiodic signalling
20 21
Eva Lucas-Reina1, Francisco J. Romero-Campero2, José M. Romero1 and
22
Federico Valverde1,*
23 24
1
Institute for Plant Biochemistry and Photosynthesis. Plant Development Unit.
25
CSIC and Universidad de Sevilla. 49th Americo Vespucio Av., 41092 Seville,
26
SPAIN.
27
2
Departamento de Ciencias de la Computación e Inteligencia Artificial, Grupo
28
de Investigación en Computación Natural, Universidad de Sevilla, Reina
29
Mercedes Av., 41012 Seville, SPAIN
30 31 32
SUMMARY
33
Algal DOF transcription factor is involved in photoperiod response and this
34
function is conserved in angiosperms despite its wide functional amplification
35
and diversification.
36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 2 Downloaded from www.plantphysiol.org on August 31, 2015 - Published by www.plant.org Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
45 46
FOOTNOTES
47 48
Financial sources
49
Work supported by projects BIO2011-28847-C02-00 and BIO2014-52425-P
50
(MINECO) and P08-AGR-03582 (Junta de Andalucía) and FEDER funding.
51
E.L.-R. fellowship is a CSIC–Junta de Ampliación de Estudios fellow, partly
52
supported by structural funding from the European Union (European Social
53
Fund). RNAseq data was performed with a help from the “Juan de la Cierva”
54
Program (MINECO) to F.J.R.-C.
55 56 57
Corresponding author
58
Federico Valverde
59
E-mail:
[email protected] 60 61
3 Downloaded from www.plantphysiol.org on August 31, 2015 - Published by www.plant.org Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
62
Abstract
63
The response to day length is a crucial process that evolved very early in plant
64
evolution, entitling the early green eukaryote to predict seasonal variability and
65
attune its physiological responses to the environment. The photoperiod
66
responses evolved into the complex signalling pathways that govern
67
angiosperm floral transition today. The Chlamydomonas CrDOF gene controls
68
transcription in a photoperiod-dependent manner and its missexpression
69
influences algal growth and viability. In short days, CrDOF enhances CrCO
70
expression, a homolog of plant CONSTANS (CO) by direct binding to its
71
promoter, while it reduces the expression of cell-division genes in long days
72
independently of CrCO. In Arabidopsis, transgenic plants overexpressing
73
CrDOF show floral delay and reduced expression of the photoperiodic genes
74
CO and FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT). The conservation of the DOF-CO module
75
during plant evolution could be an important clue to understand diversification
76
by the inheritance of conserved gene toolkits in key developmental programs.
77 78 79 80 81 82
4 Downloaded from www.plantphysiol.org on August 31, 2015 - Published by www.plant.org Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
83
Introduction
84
Due to its sessile lifestyle, vascular plants have evolved intricate genetic
85
regulatory pathways to control essential developmental processes in response
86
to changes in the environment. One of the most distinctive processes is the
87
floral transition (Amasino, 2010) that integrates information from endogenous
88
and external signals to guarantee the reproductive success (Valverde, 2011). In
89
Arabidopsis the CO gene plays a central role in the control of the photoperiodic
90
flowering by triggering the expression of FT in the leaf vascular tissue (An et al.,
91
2004). FT codes for a major component of the florigenic signal that moves
92
through the phloem to induce flower differentiation at the shoot apex (Corbesier
93
et al., 2007; Tamaki et al., 2007). CO and FT are controlled at the
94
transcriptional level by a circadian and photoperiodic signal through the
95
FLAVIN-BINDING, KELCH REPEAT, F-BOX 1 (FKF1), GIGANTEA (GI) and
96
CDF genes (Song et al., 2012). In long days (LD), blue light induces the
97
assembly of the FKF1-GI complex that promotes the proteasome-mediated
98
degradation of the CDFs, a four-member family of DOF (DNA-binding with One
99
Finger) transcription factors (TFs) that bind to CO and FT promoters, repressing
100
their expression (Song et al., 2012). The photoperiodic pathway is probably the
101
most conserved of the flowering signalling responses in Spermatophytes
102
(Amasino, 2010) and can be traced back to Chlorophytes where CrCO, a CO
103
homologous gene from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii was identified (Serrano et
104
al., 2009). CrCO is involved in the regulation of starch synthesis and cell growth
105
in the alga (Serrano et al., 2009), two processes that are also regulated by CO-
106
Like (COL) gene family members in vascular plants (Valverde, 2011; Romero-
107
Campero et al., 2013). In addition, transgenic plants overexpressing CrCO
108
under a constitutive or phloem-specific promoter, flowered earlier than WT
109
plants and complemented co mutants (Serrano et al., 2009).
110
CDFs constitute a subgroup of DOF TFs (Imaizumi et al., 2005; Fornara
111
et al., 2009), characterized by the presence of a 52 amino acid DOF domain, a
112
single zinc finger that binds to the DNA consensus sequence AAAG. DOFs can
113
work as transcriptional activators or inhibitors depending on the protein and the
114
target gene concerned (Noguero et al., 2013). The DOF domain is bi-functional
115
as it can participate in DNA-binding and protein–protein interactions 5 Downloaded from www.plantphysiol.org on August 31, 2015 - Published by www.plant.org Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
116
(Yanagisawa, 1997). DOFs have been exclusively described in plants and are
117
involved in numerous processes from tissue differentiation to metabolic
118
regulation and seed development. They are widely distributed, with numerous
119
genomic copies, in both Gymnosperms and Angiosperms and constitute a small
120
gene family in some Briophytes such as in the moss Physcomitrella patens. A
121
single copy CrDOF gene from Chlamydomonas (Moreno-Risueño et al., 2007;
122
Shigyo et al., 2007) represents the ancestor of the DOF TFs family. DOFs are
123
absent in heterotrophic eukaryotes, red algae and heterokonts (Hernando-
124
Amado et al., 2012), so modern DOFs, similarly to COLs, constitute a family of
125
TFs exclusive of the green lineage (Serrano et al., 2009).
126
Here we show that CrDOF induces CrCO expression in short days (SD)
127
and is a general repressor of algal gene expression in LD. CrDOF expression in
128
Arabidopsis reproduces CDFs function by reducing CO and FT transcript levels
129
and delaying flowering. DOF-CO evolutionarily conserved signalling module
130
constitutes a direct clue of how developmental responses may have evolved
131
from unicellular algae to multicellular plants by the parallel evolution of
132
developmental gene toolkits.
133 134
6 Downloaded from www.plantphysiol.org on August 31, 2015 - Published by www.plant.org Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
135
Results
136
Chlamydomonas CrDOF defines a subfamily of DOF Transcription Factors
137
closely related to CDFs in Arabidopsis
138
In
139
(http://phytozome.jgi.doe.gov/pz/portal.html),
140
(Cre12.g521150) in position 4424576 – 4431469 on chromosome 12 (CrDOF),
141
showed a significant identity with DOF TFs (Moreno-Risueño et al., 2007). In
142
order to characterize its gene structure, three cDNA clones from the Kazusa
143
ORF collection (http://www.kazusa.or.jp), were sequenced. The CrDOF coding
144
sequence was 1875 bp long and was identical to the draft genome sequence
145
(Merchant et al., 2007) at the 3’ end, but shorter at the 5’ (Fig. 1A). This was
146
further confirmed by the alignment of the RNAseq data to the predicted gene
147
structure (Fig. 1B).
v5.5
of
the
C.
genome
reinhardtii a
annotation
single-copy
gene
148
Using CrDOF amino acid sequence, a blast search in several
149
representative plant species was run and 84 different putative DOF proteins
150
identified (Supplemental Table S1). These sequences were used to construct a
151
phylogenetic tree (Fig. 1C) using the Mega5 program (Tamura et al., 2011).
152
This phylogenetic tree presents four clusters, including Chlorophyte (cluster 1),
153
Bryophyte (cluster 2) and Spermatophyte (clusters 3a and cluster 3b-3c)
154
sequences. Cluster 3b-3c enclosed the Arabidopsis photoperiodic CDFs
155
(Imaizumi et al., 2005; Fornara et al., 2009), closely aligned with Chlorophyte
156
sequences including CrDOF. This protein family also comprised other DOFs
157
from Populus, Zea and Oriza, which may represent putative photoperiodic DOF
158
TFs, such as OsDOF12 (RDD4) that has been involved in photoperiodic
159
flowering in rice (Li et al., 2009). No Physcomitrella protein was included in this
160
cluster; rather they formed a group on their own bridging Chlorophyte with
161
Spermatophyte sequences. The subfamily 3a included DOF proteins from
162
Arabidopsis, poplar, maize and rice that have been involved in diverse
163
processes other than photoperiodic flowering, such as AtDAG1,2, involved in
164
germination in Arabidopsis (Papi et al., 2000; Gualberti et al., 2002) or ZmDOF3
165
(PBF1), involved in storage protein synthesis in maize seeds (Vicente-
166
Carbajosa et al., 1997).
7 Downloaded from www.plantphysiol.org on August 31, 2015 - Published by www.plant.org Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
167
CDF proteins have a characteristic domain structure (Fig. 1C, group 3b)
168
with a conserved DOF domain (blue) preceded by a nuclear localization signal
169
(NLS, red). Carboxy-terminal domains for GI (purple) and FKF1 (orange)
170
binding sites are specific for CDFs as they participate in the interactions that
171
control their posttranslational regulation (Kloosterman et al., 2013). A conserved 8 Downloaded from www.plantphysiol.org on August 31, 2015 - Published by www.plant.org Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
172
amino-terminal domain of unknown function (yellow) is also present. The
173
ancestral algal DOF protein from group 1 (Fig. 1C) contains the conserved DOF
174
domain and the NLS signal, but lacks any other clear domain. In Physcomitrella,
175
although GI and FKF1 proteins have not been identified in its genome (Rensing
176
et al., 2008), different DOF proteins (cluster 2) include regions that resemble the
177
GI, FKF1 binding site, that together with the yellow domains have later evolved
178
into the modern plant DOF domains in CDFs (clusters 3b and 3c) and other
179
DOFs (cluster 3a) (Kloosterman et al., 2013). Therefore, the original algal DOF
180
TF acquired new domains that defined their regulation and function (Fig. 1C) as
181
suggested by the close association between domain structure and function
182
observed in the phylogenetic tree.
183 184
CrDOF is differentially expressed under diverse photoperiod conditions in
185
Chlamydomonas
186
Arabidopsis CDFs are differentially expressed under diverse day lengths in
187
order to correctly time the expression of CO and confer a photoperiodic
188
response to flowering (Imaizumi et al., 2005). CrDOF expression in
189
Chlamydomonas was monitored under LD and SD every 4h for 24h starting at
190
Zeitgeber Time 0 (ZT0), the moment the lights are switched on. CrDOF mRNA
191
levels were higher in LD than in SD and the expression profile resembled that of
192
CDFs in Arabidopsis: A peak of expression in the late night and early morning
193
(Fornara et al., 2009) (Fig. 2A). When the expression was monitored during a
194
24h LD followed by 48h in continuous light (LL) or continuous dark (DD), the
195
expression of CrDOF continued oscillating (Fig. 2B). This was particularly true
196
for LL, but even a slight oscillation in DD was observed after 48 h, indicating a
197
circadian influence.
198
To monitor the presence of CrDOF protein we produced polyclonal
199
antibodies by immunizing rabbits with a recombinant CrDOF purified from E.
200
coli (Methods). These antibodies were used to detect CrDOF in extracts from
201
the recombinant bacteria and from Chlamydomonas (Fig. 2C). While the
202
recombinant protein showed a molecular mass (MM) of 60 kD, which is close to
203
its predicted size (62 kD), the extract from Chlamydomonas showed a unique
204
band of approximately 100 kD. Because we used SDS-PAGE conditions, the
205
result
suggested
that
the
100
kD
band
reflected
an
SDS-resistant
9 Downloaded from www.plantphysiol.org on August 31, 2015 - Published by www.plant.org Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
206
posttranslational modification, such as has been shown for other SDS-resistant
207
complexes from plants and animals described previously in the literature
208
(Lüders et al., 2003; Varet et al., 2003; Kubista et al., 2004). Using these
209
antibodies, we followed the presence of CrDOF in 24h courses in LD and SD
210
(Fig. 2D; Supplemental Fig. S1A), in protein extracts from the same samples as
211
in Fig. 2A. CrDOF protein showed a higher accumulation in LD than in SD and a
212
clear circadian oscillation. However, in contrast to the mRNA profile, CrDOF
213
minimal presence was monitored at ZT4 and its maximum at dusk (ZT16-20),
214
coinciding with CDF2 stability profile in Arabidopsis (Fornara et al., 2009). Thus,
215
the expression of CrDOF mRNA and its protein stability are displaced in time.
216
To study CrDOF modifications, protein extracts from Chlamydomonas
217
were incubated with different chemicals and immunodetected with α-CrDOF. 10 Downloaded from www.plantphysiol.org on August 31, 2015 - Published by www.plant.org Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
218
When proteins were extracted with 8 M urea (a potent chaotropic agent), or in
219
the presence of 10 mM DTT (that breaks cysteine disulphide bonds) or a
220
mixture of both (Supplemental Fig. S1B upper panel), only the 100 kD band was
221
detected. Nevertheless, when proteins were extracted with a buffer containing 6
222
M guanidine chlorhydrate (Gd), a potent ionic chaotrop, the band of 100 kD was
223
replaced by a band of 60 kD (Supplemental Fig. S1B, lower panel). To discard
224
ubiquitin modifications, that are involved in Arabidopsis CDF stability (Imaizumi
225
et al., 2005), extracts were incubated with 1 mM of the proteasome inhibitor
226
MG-132. However, the intensity of the signal of the 100 kD band did not
227
increase or showed any mobility shift (Supplemental Fig. S1B bottom right),
228
probably indicating that the proteasome was not involved in CrDOF stability. So,
229
it is possible that CrDOF establishes tight connections with other(s) protein(s)
230
that control its function. As CDF stability is reduced under blue light in
231
Arabidopsis (Imaizumi et al., 2005), we monitored if CrDOF stability was
232
influenced by light quality. Chlamydomonas cultures were grown under LL, DD,
233
constant blue light (BB) or constant red light (RR), cell extracts were prepared
234
and immunoblots run using CrDOF antibodies. No significant difference in
235
CrDOF accumulation was detected in any light condition (Supplemental Fig.
236
S1C) indicating that light quality has no effect on its posttranslational stability.
237
The presence of CrDOF protein was also monitored under the confocal
238
microscope in an algal line (CrDOFox:YFP, see below) that expressed the
239
Yellow Fluorescent Protein (YFP) fused to CrDOF carboxyl end (Fig. 2E). To
240
identify the cell nucleus we developed a novel method for Chlamydomonas
241
using the nucleic acid-specific dye SYTO®Blue45 (Molecular Probes) in order to
242
visualize nuclear material in vivo without interfering with YFP and chloroplast
243
fluorescence (Methods). SYTO®Blue45 dye in blue a nucleic-acid-rich region of
244
CW15, sited in the flagella pole and encircled by the unique cup-shaped
245
structure of the chloroplast, which we identified as the nucleus (Fig. 2E, upper
246
panel). The merged figure in the lower panel (Fig. 2E) showed that the YFP
247
signal coincided with the blue signal from the dye, indicating that CrDOF:YFP
248
fusion was preferentially localized in the nucleus.
249 250
Modification of CrDOF expression alters Chlamydomonas growth
11 Downloaded from www.plantphysiol.org on August 31, 2015 - Published by www.plant.org Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
251
To clarify the role of CrDOF in Chlamydomonas, algal lines with altered levels of
252
CrDOF mRNA were produced using Gateway technology vectors (Invitrogen)
253
containing constitutive or inducible promoters (Methods). Thus, CrDOF genomic
254
sequence was fused to the pnia2 promoter (CrDOFin) for inducible expression
255
depending on the nitrogen source (Camargo et al., 2007). Figure 3A upper
256
panel left, shows that CrDOF expression was significantly increased in CW15
257
transformed with the CrDOFin construct under inductive (+NO3-) conditions,
258
detecting also an increase in protein levels by Western blots (Fig. 3A lower
259
panel left). CrDOF expression levels increased when CrDOF was fused to YFP
260
in its carboxyl end and expressed under the chimeric promoter HSP70/RbcS2
261
(CrDOFox:YFP) for constitutive expression (Sizova et al., 2001) (Fig. 3A right
262
upper panel). Extracts from these algae presented an extra 120 kD band
263
corresponding to the MM of CrDOF plus the YFP protein (see arrow, Fig. 3A
264
right lower panel). CrDOF expression was significantly reduced employing an
265
artificial microRNA (amiCrDOF, Methods) strategy (Molnar et al., 2009) that was
266
reflected in a decrease in mRNA and protein levels in extracts from the two
267
independent silenced lines (amiCrDOF #1 and #4) (Fig. 3B). CrDOF
268
overexpression from the constitutive and the induced promoters had a strong
269
effect in algal growth (Fig. 3C left). WT and recombinant cultures growth in
270
liquid medium (Sueoka NO3-, Methods) were monitored by measuring
271
chlorophyll content during 4 weeks in LD. Whereas CW15 reached the
272
exponential growth phase in the second week, it was retarded to the third week
273
in the CrDOFox:YFP line and even further in the CrDOFin line. The amiCrDOF
274
#1 and #4 cultures grew also slower than CC-4351 wild type (Fig. 3C right
275
panel). The growing capacity of the lines was further measured in LD and SD,
276
both in rich (TAP NO3-) and normal (Sueoka NO3-) media agar plates, by droplet
277
growth monitoring (Supplemental Fig. S1D). In all conditions, decreasing or
278
increasing CrDOF transcript levels, slowed algal growth, indicating that changes
279
in CrDOF levels affected the growing conditions of the algae.
280
To
assess
the
systemic
effect
of
CrDOF
overexpression
in
281
Chlamydomonas, a transcriptomic approach was used. Chlamydomonas cells
282
(CW15) and two overexpression lines (CrDOFin and CrDOFox:YFP) were
283
grown in Sueoka NO3- media in LD and SD, RNA was extracted at ZT4 and
284
sequenced using the NGS platform Illumina Hiseq2000. After all quality 12 Downloaded from www.plantphysiol.org on August 31, 2015 - Published by www.plant.org Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
285
parameters were verified, a stepwise protocol to analyse the transcriptome,
286
using the Chlamydomonas genome as reference, was run (Methods). Several
287
software tools for read-mapping (Bowtie and TopHat), transcriptome assembly
288
(Cuffmerge and Cufflinks) and differential gene expression analysis (Cuffdiff
289
and CummeRbund) were used. Differentially Expressed Genes (DEGs)
290
between CW15 and the two overexpression lines were identified and Venn 13 Downloaded from www.plantphysiol.org on August 31, 2015 - Published by www.plant.org Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
291
diagrams representing these differences drawn (Supplemental Fig. S1E). The
292
RNAseq data analysis showed that CrDOF overexpression in both lines
293
affected the expression of thousands of genes: 2399 genes induced and 2431
294
repressed in CrDOFin and 3255 induced and 2632 repressed in CrDOFox:YFP
295
in both LD and SD. When we separately analysed the intersection between
296
induced and repressed genes of both overexpression lines compared to WT in
297
LD and SD and performed Venn diagrams (Fig. 3D) a tendency in gene
298
expression, which was day length-dependent, emerged. CrDOF overexpression
299
caused the specific induction of 245 genes in LD and 408 genes in SD while it
300
caused the specific repression on 295 genes in LD and 163 genes in SD.
301
Therefore, the RNAseq data from the two independent overexpression lines
302
indicated that CrDOF would function preferentially as a repressor of gene
303
expression in LD and as an inducer in SD. These data can be further analysed
304
in the webpage: (http://viridiplantae.ibvf.csic.es/crdof_cell_cycle.html).
305 306
CrDOF induces CrCO expression in Chlamydomonas
307
In Arabidopsis and potato, CDFs reduce CO expression and delay flowering
308
(Imaizumi et al., 2005; Fornara et al., 2009; Kloosterman et al., 2013). To show
309
that CrDOF could have a similar role in algae, CrCO expression was monitored
310
in 24h experiments in CW15, CrDOFin and CrDOFox:YFP lines (Fig. 4A). Both
311
in LD and SD CrDOFin and CrDOFox:YFP showed an increase in CrCO
312
expression during the morning and night. This was also observed in
313
experiments in which CrDOFin lines were transferred from not induced
314
(Supplemental Fig. S2A left) to induced conditions (Supplemental Fig. S2A
315
right) for 2 h, resulting in a 3-fold increase in CrCO expression. Constitutive
316
CrDOFox:YFP lines that presented a moderate activation of CrDOF expression,
317
also showed a moderate increase in CrCO expression (Supplemental Fig. S2B).
318
On the contrary, in amiCrDOF #1 and #4 (Fig. 4B), reduced levels of CrDOF
319
produced a reduction in CrCO mRNA levels. Thus, both incrementing and
320
reducing CrDOF expression levels had a parallel effect on CrCO, but rather
321
than inhibiting CO expression as in Arabidopsis, CrDOF behaved as an
322
activator of CrCO expression in Chlamydomonas.
323
As we had observed a 60 kD and a 100 kD CrDOF protein band in
324
Chlamydomonas immunoblots, we wondered if this had a biological 14 Downloaded from www.plantphysiol.org on August 31, 2015 - Published by www.plant.org Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
325
significance, so we performed gel filtration experiments in a Superose 12
326
10/300 GL (GE Healthcare) column attached to an FPLC (GE Healthcare). Total
327
extracts from CW15 or CrDOFin lines in LD and SD conditions, at ZT4 and
328
ZT24 were run in the column, the elution profile separated by size and 15 Downloaded from www.plantphysiol.org on August 31, 2015 - Published by www.plant.org Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
329
monitored for CrDOF presence (Fig. 4C; Supplemental Table S2). In CW15, a
330
protein complex containing CrDOF eluted only in two fractions corresponding to
331
a MM of 464 kD and 314 kD (Supplemental Fig. S2C-D). The 100 kD band was
332
observed in all conditions, but the 60 kD protein was only detected at ZT4 in the
333
fraction with the higher MM complex (Fig. 4C). At ZT24, the 60 kD band was
334
absent in CW15, but was present in the CrDOFin extract in both fractions.
335
Because CrCO expression in WT cells reach its highest peak at ZT4 and in
336
CrDOFin was induced at ZT24, we think that this correlates well with the 60 kD
337
band representing the free, active protein that is able to modify CrCO
338
expression. Moreover, the ratio between CrDOF and partners seems to have an
339
important role in the complex size, as the 60 kD band presence always
340
coincided with the higher MM complex.
341
The capacity to interact with itself was also investigated by bimolecular
342
fluorescence (BiFC) (Supplemental Fig. S3A). A translational fusion of CrDOF
343
to the YFP N-terminal part (YFN-CrDOF) was co-infected by Agrobacterium-
344
mediated infiltration in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves together with CrDOF
345
fused to the carboxyl part of the YFP (YFC-CrDOF). The presence of a strong
346
yellow signal in the nucleus of the co-infiltrated Nicotiana cells showed that
347
CrDOF was able to interact with itself to form dimers or higher MM complexes.
348
To test if CrDOF could bind to CrCO promoter, Agrobacterium-mediated
349
co-infiltration experiments were run. The sequence (846 bp) expanding the
350
intergenic region between CrCO and the upstream gene (Cre06.g278158,
351
Supplemental Fig. S3B) was cloned before the GFP coding sequence in a plant
352
transformation vector (pCrCO:GFP). This construct did not show any
353
expression in Nicotiana cells under the confocal microscope (Fig. 4D panel 1),
354
indicating that no plant factor could bind to the Chlamydomonas CrCO
355
promoter. When a construct overexpressing CrDOF under a plant constitutive
356
promoter (35S:CrDOF) was co-infiltrated with pCrCO:GFP, a marked increase
357
in GFP fluorescence was observed (Fig. 4D panel 2), demonstrating that
358
CrDOF could bind to CrCO promoter. In order to quantify the signal, more than
359
100 nuclei were monitored under the confocal microscope and their
360
fluorescence registered (representing 100% signal). To identify the minimal
361
promoter that still showed CrDOF binding, a 527 bp fragment pCrCO2
362
(underlined in Supplemental Fig. S3B) and a 285 bp fragment pCrCO3 (blue in 16 Downloaded from www.plantphysiol.org on August 31, 2015 - Published by www.plant.org Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
363
Supplemental Fig. S3B) were cloned before the GFP CDS and co-infiltrated
364
with 35S:CrDOF construct in Nicotiana leaves. As observed in Fig. 4D (panels
365
3-4) GFP fluorescence did not decrease, indicating that the minimal promoter
366
pCrCO3 contained all sequences needed for CrDOF binding. In the 285 bp
367
fragment, three canonical DOF AAAG binding sites were found (grey in
368
Supplemental Fig. S3B). The three motives were mutated individually to confer
369
pCrCO3:GFP*; pCrCO3:GFP** and pCrCO3:GFP*** constructs (Supplemental
370
Fig. S3B). Only pCrCO3:GFP* and pCrCO3:GFP** showed a significant
371
decrease in GFP fluorescence when co-infiltrated with 35S:CrDOF, indicating
372
that the motive closer to CrCO initial ATG codon was not involved in CrDOF
373
binding (Fig. 4D panels 5-7). The two elements with a positive binding activity
374
conserved the (A/T)AAAG or (A)CTTT(A) extra nucleotides characteristic of
375
DOF-binding sites (Yanagisawa and Schmidt, 1999) not present in the third site.
376
Therefore, we had identified the binding site sequence of the primitive DOF
377
gene and showed that it recognized the same core region as in higher plants.
378
This constitutes another evidence of the conservation of DOF TFs function
379
during plant diversification.
380 381
CrDOF alters algal cell cycle progression in a photoperiod-dependent
382
manner
383
CrCO
384
Chlamydomonas and thus the capacity to synchronize cell division and growth
385
in particular environmental and photoperiod conditions (Serrano et al., 2009).
386
As CrDOF overexpression and amiRNA constructs showed growth defects and
387
altered CrCO expression, we examined if the cell cycle was also affected in
388
these lines. Cell cycle defects are associated with a change in size due to cell
389
division alterations (Umen and Goodenough, 2001). When we analysed
390
CrDOFin and CrDOFox:YFP cells in LD by flow cytometry (Fig. 5A upper
391
panels) they showed an increase in size compared to CW15, whereas in SD
392
they were smaller. On the contrary, amiCrDOF #1 and #4 lines did not show
393
any significant alteration in cell size in LD but showed a marked decrease in
394
SD. Therefore, cell size in Chlamydomonas was severely affected by changes
395
in CrDOF expression and was influenced by photoperiod.
missexpression
was
shown
to
affect
synchronous
division
17 Downloaded from www.plantphysiol.org on August 31, 2015 - Published by www.plant.org Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
in
396
Cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases are key proteins involved in cell
397
cycle progression in eukaryotes, and this function is conserved in green
398
microalgae (Bisova et al., 2005). In Chlamydomonas it was shown that cyclin
399
A1 (CrCYCA1) and cyclin-dependent kinase B1 (CrCDKB1) transcript levels
400
increased when CrCO levels increased in SD in order to promote the highly
401
synchronized mitotic divisions at the end of the day characteristic of
402
synchronous growth (Serrano et al., 2009). In order to assess the role of CrDOF
403
in this process we measured the capacity to activate the expression of 18 Downloaded from www.plantphysiol.org on August 31, 2015 - Published by www.plant.org Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
404
CrCYCA1 and CrCDKB1 in LD and SD in the inducible line. CrDOF induction in
405
two independent lines greatly enhanced the expression of CrCYCA1 in SD (Fig.
406
5B left lower panel), while in LD it had the opposite effect (Fig. 5B left upper
407
panel), inhibiting the small peak of expression present in CW15. CrCDKB1
408
expression showed a similar response, as it was significantly enhanced in SD,
409
but was strongly inhibited in LD by CrDOF overexpression (Fig. 5B right).
410
Therefore, CrDOF overexpression altered cell cycle progression by increasing
411
CrCYCA1 and CrCDKB1 transcript levels in SD and decreasing them in LD.
412
Because CrDOF activates CrCO expression, this effect may be associated with
413
the induction in CrCO mRNA levels observed in CrDOFin during the morning
414
(Fig. 4A), but this could not explain the inhibitory effect in LD. To confirm these
415
results we performed a clustering and functional enrichment using the RNAseq
416
data from CW15, CrDOFin and CrDOFox:YFP lines in SD and LD at ZT4. The
417
functional enrichment of genes inhibited by CrDOF overexpression in LD
418
showed that a significant part of the genes were involved in cell cycle
419
progression
420
(http://viridiplantae.ibvf.csic.es/crdof_cell_cycle.html). Therefore, CrDOF inhibits
421
cell cycle progression in LD independently of CrCO and activates its
422
progression in SD by inducing CrCO expression (Fig. 5C). In this scenario, cells
423
would be larger in LD as cell cycle is inhibited during the day (Fig. 5C left), while
424
in SD cells maintain a small size due to the activation of the cell cycle promoted
425
by CrCO (Fig. 5C right) as we had previously shown in the flow cytometer
426
experiments.
including
CrCYCA1
and
CrCDKB1
427 428
CrDOF in Arabidopsis delays flowering through the interaction with CDFs
429
In Arabidopsis, CDFs inhibit CO expression during the morning to avoid FT
430
missexpression outside the evening coincidence window that sets the exact
431
synchronization of flowering by day length. To test the capacity of CrDOF to
432
alter flowering time in Arabidopsis we expressed CrDOF under the control of the
433
constitutive promoter 35S (35S:CrDOF). CrDOF heterologous expression in
434
Arabidopsis delayed flowering in LD, 35S:CrDOF plants flowering with ten
435
leaves more than in Col-0, and had no effect in SD (Fig. 6A; Table I). We then
436
followed CO and FT expression during a 24h course in LD (Fig. 6B) and SD
437
(Supplemental Fig. S4A) in Col-0 and 35S:CrDOF plants. While CO expression 19 Downloaded from www.plantphysiol.org on August 31, 2015 - Published by www.plant.org Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
438
was reduced during the daytime in LD, particularly during the evening
439
(shadowed in Fig. 6B above left), the expression in SD was not affected
440
(Supplemental Fig. S4A above). In 35S:CrDOF plants in LD, FT expression was
441
strongly inhibited during the whole photoperiod (Fig. 6B above right), explaining
20 Downloaded from www.plantphysiol.org on August 31, 2015 - Published by www.plant.org Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
442
the late flowering phenotype in LD, but in SD no effect was observed
443
(Supplemental Fig. S4A below).
444
CDFs work additively to repress CO and FT expression, so that in the
445
quadruple
mutant
446
constitutively high (Fornara et al., 2009). We tested if CrDOF could complement
447
the early flowering phenotype observed in 4cdf (Fig. 6C; Table I). While 4cdf
448
mutant flowered earlier than Col-0 in LD and SD, ectopic expression of CrDOF
449
in 4cdf background had no effect on flowering time. Therefore, CrDOF have no
450
effect on the floral transition in the absence of CDFs. This suggests that CrDOF
451
may interact with the CDFs and enhance their capacity to inhibit CO and FT
452
expression. To test this hypothesis we performed BiFC experiments in
453
Nicotiana (Supplemental Fig. S4B). Both CDF1 and CDF2 were able to interact
454
with each other and CDF2 with itself (Panels 3-4) but they could also interact
455
with CrDOF (Panels 1-2). When we used CrDOF specifc antibodies in Col-0
456
nuclear extracts we could detect several bands around and below 60 kD that
457
could account for Arabidopsis DOF TFs, including CDFs, which present smaller
458
size than other DOFs (Supplemental Fig. S4C left panel). In fact, these signals
459
increased in extracts from ZT0 to ZT8, where the maximum amount of CDFs is
460
supposed to accumulate (Fornara et al., 2009). In 35S:CrDOF plants, the
461
immunodetection of the 60 kD band increased significantly both in col-0 and in
462
the 4cdf mutant background (Supplemental Fig. S4C right panel), due to
463
accumulation of CrDOF, but we could never detect the 100 kD band that we
464
had observed in Chlamydomonas. The exclusive presence of the 60 kD band in
465
the recombinant E. coli cultures (Fig. 2C), the detection of the 60 and 100 kD
466
bands in the gel filtration experiments in Chlamydomonas (Fig. 4C) and the lack
467
of a 100 kD band in Arabidopsis, strongly suggest that the higher MM must be a
468
specific characteristic of algae DOFs and that the active form must be the 60 kD
469
protein. Using a 35S:GFP:CrDOF construct, we could also show the nuclear
470
localization of CrDOF in Arabidopsis (Supplemental Fig. S4D).
cdf1/cdf2/cdf3/cdf5
(4cdf)
CO
transcript
levels
are
471
To further demonstrate the effect of CrDOF over CO and FT expression
472
we infiltrated Nicotiana cells with Agrobacterium carrying constructs expressing
473
GFP under the control of CO (pCO:GFP) and FT (pFT:GFP) promoters (Fig.
474
6D). Both constructs showed a clear nuclear GFP signal when infiltrated alone.
475
When a negative control (AKIN10) was co-transformed with pCO:GFP, no 21 Downloaded from www.plantphysiol.org on August 31, 2015 - Published by www.plant.org Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
476
reduction in GFP fluorescence was observed. As expected, co-transformation of
477
pCO:GFP with a construct ectopically expressing CDF1 produced a dramatic
478
decrease in GFP fluorescence. Ectopic co-expression of CrDOF had a lower,
479
but still significant effect in GFP fluorescence. In a similar way to what was
480
shown in the expression experiments, CrDOF also reduced GFP fluorescence
481
when GFP was driven by the FT promoter (Fig. 6D right), suggesting a role for
482
CrDOF (and CDFs) in FT expression.
483 484
22 Downloaded from www.plantphysiol.org on August 31, 2015 - Published by www.plant.org Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
485
Discussion
486
DOF proteins are present in the genomes of higher plants and unicellular green
487
algae (Chlorophytes) and are absent from all other algal divisions and, in fact,
488
from any other prokaryote or non-green-lineage eukaryote (Moreno-Risueño et
489
al., 2007). This way, we could identify CrDOF sequences in several
490
Chlorophytes orders such as Chamydomonadales (Chlamydomonas and
491
Volvox genres); Trebouxiophyceae (Chlorella and Coccomyxa genres),
492
Mamiellales (Ostreococcus, Bathyococcus and Micromonas genres) and
493
Chlorodendrales (Tetraselmis). CrDOF sequences were absent from other
494
major algal divisions such as the primary endosymbionts Rhodophytes
495
(Cyanidioschyzon) and Glaucophytes (Cyanophora), but also from other
496
secondary endosymbionts such as Euglenophytes (Euglena), Haptophytes
497
(Emiliania), Heteroconts (Phaeodactylum, Thalassiosira and Navicula genres),
498
Cryptophytes (Guillardia), Chloraracniophytes (Bigelowiella) and Dynophytes
499
(Symbiodinium). Therefore, they constitute a good model to study the evolution
500
of specific regulatory pathways in plants. DOFs are found as single copy genes
501
in the genome of Chlorophytes but in Physcomitrella patens we have identified
502
16 genes homologous to CrDOF, while others have identified a family of 19
503
members (Shigyo et al., 2007). In rice and maize around 31 and 10 DOF genes
504
have been identified, respectively, while in Arabidopsis and Populus numbers
505
are even higher: 36 and 61, respectively (Noguero et al., 2013). Therefore, this
506
family has increased from a single copy gene in algae, to a multi-copy family
507
with numerous functions, including the control of photoperiodic flowering, in
508
Angiosperms. Therefore, the study of the ancestral function of the algal DOF
509
was important to understand how different regulatory pathways are controlled,
510
being the photoperiod pathway of special interest.
511
In Arabidopsis, potato and rice, several DOF genes have been classified
512
as CDFs because they are regulated by the clock and at the same time regulate
513
photoperiodic flowering (Imaizumi et al., 2005; Fornara et al., 2009; Li et al.,
514
2009; Kloosterman et al., 2013). In its domain structure, ancient DOF proteins
515
contained a single DOF domain with a NLS in its amino terminal part. This
516
structure is repeatedly found in green microalgae. In the course of evolution, as
517
observed in Physcomitrella DOFs, different domains were incorporated to the 23 Downloaded from www.plantphysiol.org on August 31, 2015 - Published by www.plant.org Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
518
basic pattern that added new regulatory elements to the protein and recruited
519
novel regulators to the pathway (Fig. 1C). As a culmination to this evolutionary
520
process, higher plant CDFs possess an established structure that is the
521
combination of several domains present in Bryophytes, such as the GIGANTEA
522
and FKF1 binding elements, responsible for their complex posttranslational
523
regulation. Therefore, the evolution of DOF factors is a good example of the
524
Innovation-Amplification-Divergence model of evolution by gene duplication
525
described also for the family of COL genes in photosynthetic eukaryotes
526
(Romero-Campero et al., 2013).
527
DOF transcription factors have multiple roles in plants, from the control of
528
nitrogen and carbon metabolic balance, as in maize DOF1 (Yanagisawa, 2000),
529
to the control of the photoperiodic flowering by Arabidopsis CDFs (Imaizumi et
530
al., 2005; Fornara et al., 2009). At the molecular level they function as DNA
531
binding proteins that regulate transcription, either inducing or repressing gene
532
expression (Noguero et al., 2013). In this paper, we have shown that the
533
Chlamydomonas single-copy DOF gene already had this double function. We
534
have provided evidence for gene induction at individual level, such as CrCO or
535
the repression of CrCYCA1 and CrCDKB1 in CrDOF overexpression lines, but
536
we have also provided systemic-level evidence using RNAseq data from WT
537
and CrDOF overexpression lines under different photoperiod conditions. We
538
have further shown that CrDOF preferentially induces or represses gene
539
expression depending on photoperiod, such that it is mainly an activator of gene
540
expression in SD and an inhibitor in LD. Both functions can indeed be recruited
541
to achieve the same goal, such as the regulation of synchronous growth. In
542
Chlamydomonas, and other microalgae, cell division is synchronized to the cell
543
cycle (Bisova and Zachleder, 2014) and this is affected by day length. This way,
544
in LD or LL, with an excess of resources, algae can divide several times and no
545
peak in cell cycle genes is detected. On the contrary, in SD, in stress conditions
546
or nutrients limitation, algae divide once a day and the cell cycle genes peak at
547
dusk (Serrano et al., 2009). Therefore, we can now compare CrDOF
548
overexpression lines data with CrCO transgenic lines data (Serrano et al.,
549
2009), where CrCO positively regulated CrCYCA1 and CrCDKB1 transcript
550
levels in SD conditions. So, we can propose that CrDOF induces CrCO
551
expression in SD at the end of the day promoting the up regulation of cell cycle 24 Downloaded from www.plantphysiol.org on August 31, 2015 - Published by www.plant.org Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
552
factors such as CrCYCA1 and CrCDKB1 (Fig. 7). This peak of expression
553
activates the cell cycle and assures cell division in that particular time, allowing
554
all algae in the culture to divide synchronously. In LD, on the contrary, CrDOF
555
inhibits the expression of cell cycle genes in specific conditions when no
556
synchronous division is necessary, thus allowing indeterminate cell division
557
throughout the day. In fact, in Arabidopsis, the DOF factor OBP1 is involved in
558
the control of cell cycle by inducing the expression of cyclin CYCD3.3 and its
559
overexpression causes the reduction of G1 phase, accelerating growth (Skirycz
560
et al., 2008), suggesting that this algal DOF function is conserved in plants.
561
Our data suggest that a posttranslational regulatory step is necessary to
562
explain CrDOF function, as CrDOF can bind to DNA as a single 60 kD form, but
563
it is mostly detected as a 100 kD band in Chlamydomonas extracts. We
564
propose that the most plausible explanation is that a partner, or more than one,
565
may bind CrDOF in a protein complex. Bound CrDOF would be unable to
566
promote or inhibit gene expression. In the CrDOF induced line this regulation is
567
lost, probably due to an excess of CrDOF in the complex, so that free CrDOF
568
could then activate CrCO expression. The experiments in Nicotiana cells that
569
show that CrDOF can bind directly to CrCO promoter, the absence of the 100 25 Downloaded from www.plantphysiol.org on August 31, 2015 - Published by www.plant.org Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
570
kD band in plant immunodetections and the data from the chromatographic
571
experiments in Chlamydomonas, where the 60 kD appear only when CrDOF
572
induces CrCO expression, suggest that CrDOF is active whenever the 60 kD
573
band is detected. Therefore, we propose that CrCO mRNA levels induction by
574
CrDOF in algae is a direct effect caused by DOF binding to its promoter.
575
In Arabidopsis, CrDOF overexpression delays flowering by reducing CO
576
and FT levels exclusively in LD and not in SD, reflecting a strict photoperiodic
577
response. In our model, as CrDOF cannot alter flowering time in the 4cdf
578
mutant, it is possible that CrDOF could act in a complex with the CDFs,
579
protecting them from the proteasome degradation triggered by GI-FKF, as
580
CrDOF does not present the binding domains for these proteins (Fig. 7 right). In
581
Nicotiana experiments, CrDOF also inhibit CO and FT expression probably
582
through the interaction with the Nicotiana CDF homologs. This association
583
between CDFs and CrDOF could have interesting applications in plant
584
biotechnology to modify flowering time.
585
Conclusions
586
It is interesting to notice that both COL and DOF genes seem to have suffered a
587
similar evolutionary process and often cluster together in gene co-expression
588
networks constructed from different organisms representing different steps of
589
plant evolution (Romero-Campero et al., 2013). Both CO and CDF proteins are
590
part of the photoperiod pathway. It is likely that other partners of this route (i.e.
591
FLOWERING BHLHs [FBHs] [Ito et al., 2012], FKF, COP1…) had followed a
592
similar co-evolution process. If this was the case, and further, could be
593
demonstrated for other routes, it may constitute the basis of a general
594
evolutionary conserved process in which all members of a regulatory pathway
595
(toolkit) evolve together, restrained and connected by the functional links
596
established early in evolution in the original regulatory network (Romero-
597
Campero et al., 2013; Ichihashi et al., 2014; Della Pina et al., 2014). Our
598
demonstration that the DOF-CO module is conserved from algae to higher
599
plants provides direct evidence that this effect may be indeed be taking place.
600
The study of these conserved toolkits throughout the plant evolutionary lineage
601
may provide important hints to understand the processes that allowed the
602
differentiation of higher plants from simple unicellular algae. 26 Downloaded from www.plantphysiol.org on August 31, 2015 - Published by www.plant.org Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
603 604
Materials and methods
605
Biological Material and Growth Conditions
606
Chlamydomonas reinhardtii wild types CW15 (Davies and Plaskitt, 1971), CC-
607
4351 [From René Matagne, University of Liège, Belgium via Michael Schroda
608
(Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology)] and transgenic lines, were
609
grown in flasks with minimum Sueoka media (Sueoka et al., 1967) or rich TAP
610
(Tris Acetate Phosphate) media (Harris, 1989) in LD or SD conditions at 50 µE
611
light intensity with temperatures ranging from 22°C (day) to 18°C (night). For
612
induction of nia2 promoter, algal cells grown to exponential phase in Sueoka
613
media supplemented with ammonium, were harvested by centrifugation (4 mins
614
at 3,200 g) and suspended in Sueoka media supplemented with nitrate.
615
Arabidopsis thaliana plants were grown in soil for phenotypic analysis or
616
in MS agar media supplemented with 1% (w/v) sucrose plates for QPCR
617
assays. In both cases, seeds were previously incubated during 4 days at 4°C
618
before sowing. Plants were grown in humidity controlled (80%) chambers with
619
100 µE light intensity and temperatures ranging from 22°C (day) to 18°C (night).
620
Different photoperiods were used: 16 hr light / 8 hr dark (long day, LD) and 8 hr
621
light / 16 hr dark (short day, SD).
622
Cloning and analysis of CrDOF
623
The complete CrDOF ORF was obtained from the cDNA Collection of Kazusa
624
DNA Research Centre (http://www.kazusa.or.jp). Sequencing of the cDNA
625
showed 100% identity with predicted locus Cre12.g521150 (position: 4425725
626
to 4430320) from Phytozome v.9.1. CrDOF deduced protein was 625 amino-
627
acid long and contained a DOF-type zinc finger domain (Moreno-Risueño et al.,
628
2007; Yanagisawa, 1997).
629
Phylogenetic analysis and identification of conserved motifs
630
Evolutionary relationships among DOF proteins from the green algae
631
Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (Cre), Volvox carteri (Vc), Ostreococcus tauri (Ot)
632
and Micromonas pusilla (Mp); the Bryophyte Physcomitrella patens (Pp); the
633
monocots Oriza sativa (Os) and Zea mays (Zm) and the dicots Arabidopsis
634
thaliana (At) and Populus trichocarpa (Pt) were analyzed using CrDOF full
635
length amino-acid sequence as a query to detect protein homologs in
27 Downloaded from www.plantphysiol.org on August 31, 2015 - Published by www.plant.org Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
636
Phytozome v9.1 database. All sequences were aligned using the program
637
MUSCLE (Edgar, 2004) and a phylogenetic tree was generated applying the
638
Neighbor-Joining algorithm (Saitou and Nei, 1987) with the JTT + G 0.54 as a
639
substitution model (Jones et al., 1992). The number of bootstrap replicates was
640
500. Phylogenetic analyses were conducted with MEGA5 (Tamura et al., 2011).
641
Accession numbers of sequences used in the alignment are shown in
642
Supplemental Table S1. A domain analysis of the same 84 DOF proteins in the
643
phylogenetic
644
meme.nbcr.net/meme/) (Bailey et al., 2009). The motifs domain were
645
characterized
646
(http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/Structure/cdd/wrpsb.cgi). Further identification of
647
the GI and FKF1 binding domains was done as in Kloosterman et al., 2013.
648
Phenotypic analysis
649
Growth curve and drop test. Algal cultures were grown to stationary phase in LD
650
conditions and then diluted to 0.5 µg mL-1 of chlorophyll with new media.
651
Culture growth was monitored by chlorophyll measures once a week for one
652
month. For drop tests, the culture in stationary phase was diluted to 4 to 5x106
653
cells mL-1 and 3 consecutive 1/10 dilutions were made. 3 µl drops were grown
654
in agar plates containing Sueoka NO3- or TAP NO3- media and incubated in LD
655
or SD.
656
Flow cytometry. WT and transgenic lines, samples were taken at ZT4 in LD and
657
SD conditions in Sueoka media supplemented with NO3- and analyzed on a BD
658
influx™ Cell Sorter flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, Canada) equipped with a
659
laser with a 488 nm line at 200 mW and analysed with “BD FACS sortware”.
660
Analysis of flowering time. Flowering time was analyzed in LD and SD
661
conditions in controlled environment cabinets by scoring the number of rosette
662
(excluding cotyledons) and cauline leaves. Data are media of at least 30
663
individual ± standard error of the mean (SEM).
664
Algal and plant transformation
665
Chlamydomonas. For Chlamydomonas nuclear transformation, a modification of
666
the electroporation protocol from (Shimogawara et al., 1998) was used. In brief,
667
about 1 to 5x106 cells mL-1 were harvested by centrifugation at 1,500 g and
668
suspended in TAP medium supplemented with 60 mM sucrose in 1/100 the
669
original volume. 250 µl of cell suspension and 1 µg of the plasmid were placed
tree
was
using
done the
using
the
Conserved
MEME Domain
software Search
28 Downloaded from www.plantphysiol.org on August 31, 2015 - Published by www.plant.org Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
(http:// Service
670
into 0.4 cm gapped cuvette and incubated for 30 mins on ice. After a 800 v
671
pulse (15 µF and no shunt resistance) in an electroporator, cells were
672
transferred to 10 mL TAP media supplemented with 60 mM of sucrose and
673
incubated overnight with moderate shaking and light. Cells were harvested by
674
centrifugation, resuspended in 700 µl TAP media and spread into selective TAP
675
agar plates containing hygromicine 25 µg mL-1. Colonies started to appear after
676
1 week. For the nitrate inducible CrDOF expression vector construction, the
677
Gateway modified version of the pnia2 vector (Serrano et al., 2009) was used.
678
For the constitutive CrDOF vector expression construction, direct gene
679
synthesis from Invitrogen was used. In-silico sequence of Hsp70A/RbcS2
680
constitutive promoter, Gatteway casette B and 3`UTR Rubisco terminator were
681
performed and restriction enzymes sites present in gateway cassette and
682
terminator were changed without modifying the codon use. YFP and
683
hygromicine resistence (HYG) were cloned into EcoRV/BamHI and KpnI
684
restriction sites, respectively. YFP was adapted to the Chlamydomonas codon
685
preference (Matsuo and Ishiura, 2010).
686
Aradidopsis. For Arabidopsis Col-0 or 4cdfs transformation, the Agrobacterium-
687
mediated floral dip protocol was used. CrDOF cDNA was amplified by PCR (5'-
688
GGGGACAAGTTTGTACAAAAAAGCAGGCTTCGAAGGAGATAGAACCATGG
689
TAGACGGTGGTTCG-3'
690
GGGGACCACTTTGTACAAGAAAGCTGGGTCTCACCTAGCACCCGAGTAAG
691
C-3'
692
GGGGACCACTTTGTACAAGAAAGCTGGGTCCCTAGCACCCGAGTAAGCGG
693
C-3' without STOP codon were used for carboxyl-terminal fusions) and cloned
694
into pDONOR 207 plasmid. Finally, CrDOF was cloned in pEG100 vector to
695
obtain the 35S:CrDOF construct and in pMDC43 vector to obtain the
696
35S:GFP:CrDOF construct. Arabidopsis Col-0 plants were transformed with
697
these constructs and plants selected for antibiotic resistance. 4cdfs mutant
698
plants were transformed with 35S:CrDOF construct and positive plants selected
699
by genome PCR tests using 5'- ACTGCAAGACGTGTCAGCG-3' and 5'-
700
GCCAACTCACTGTTGAACTGC-3' primers.
701
RNA techniques
702
Expression analysis by QPCR. Total RNA from Chlamydomonas cells (20 mL of
703
an exponential phase curve) or Arabidopsis seedlings (0.1 g leave tissue) were
with
and STOP
codon
5'and
29 Downloaded from www.plantphysiol.org on August 31, 2015 - Published by www.plant.org Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
5'-
704
isolated by the TRIZOL (Invitrogen) procedure following the recommendations
705
of the manufacturer. The final RNA sample was suspended in 30 µl DEPC
706
water, quantified in a ND-1000 Spectrophotometer (Nanodrop) and stored at -
707
80°C.
708
Quantitec®Reverse kit (Qiagen), diluted to a final concentration of 10 ng µl-1
709
and stored at -20°C until QPCR was performed. Specific primers to amplify the
710
3´region of each gene analysed, plus CrTUB and UBQ-10 (Supplemental Table
711
S3) as housekeeping genes, were designed with Oligo analyzer program
712
(Integrated DNA technologies, www.idtdna.com). QPCR was performed with a
713
Multicolor Real-Time PCR Detection System iQTM5 (Bio-Rad) in 10 µl
714
reactions: primer concentration 0.2 µM, 10 ng cDNA and 5 µl SensiFAST TM
715
SYBR & Fluorescein Kit (Bioline). Each sample was measured by triplicate. The
716
QPCR program consisted in i) 1 cycle (95°C, 2 min); ii) 40 cycle (95°C , 5 s;
717
60°C, 10 s and 72°C, 6 s) iii) 1 cycle (72°C, 6 s). Fluorescence was measured
718
at the end of each extension step and the melting curve was performed
719
between 55°C and 95°C. The initial concentration of candidate and reference
720
gene was calculated by means of LingRegPCR software version 11.0 (Ruijter et
721
al., 2009). Normalized data was calculated dividing the average of three
722
replicates of each sample of the candidate and reference genes.
723
Transcriptomic analysis by RNAseq. The experimental design consisted of two
724
replicates for each genotype (CrDOFin, CrDOFox:GFP and wild type CW15)
725
and growth condition (LD and SD). RNA was extracted from each sample using
726
Trizol. Library preparation was carried out following the manufacturer’s
727
recommendations. Sequencing of RNA libraries was performed with the Illumina
728
HiSeq 2000 sequencer, yielding approximately 40 million 50 bp long reads for
729
each sample. The software package FastQC (Andrews) was used for quality
730
control. All sequencing samples were of high quality and no pre-processing of
731
the reads was required to remove low quality reads or read fragments. The
732
Chlamydomonas reference genome version 5.3 (Merchant et al., 2007) and
733
annotation were downloaded from the Phytozome database (Goodstein et al.,
734
2012). Mapping of reads to the reference genome, transcript assembly and
735
differential expression was performed with the software tools Bowtie, Tophat
736
and Cufflinks (Trapnell et al., 2012) using default parameters. The R package
737
from Bioconductor CummeRbund (Goff et al., 2012) was used for subsequent
1
µg
RNA
was
used
to
synthesize
cDNA
employing
30 Downloaded from www.plantphysiol.org on August 31, 2015 - Published by www.plant.org Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
the
738
analysis and graphical representation of the results. DEGs were selected as
739
those exhibiting an expression fold change greater than 2 when compared to
740
the wild type CW15 and a pValue < 0.05. Venn diagrams comparing the
741
different sets
742
(http://omics.pnl.gov/software/venn-diagram-plotter). The RNAseq raw data
743
generated in this study are publicly available from the European Nucleotide
744
Archive
745
(http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/data/view/PRJEB6682).
746
Protein and immunological techniques
747
Purification of recombinant CrDOF. CrDOF cDNA fragment was amplified by
748
PCR using specific primers designed with NdeI/BamHI restriction enzymes
749
adaptors
750
cccggatccTCACCTAGCACCCGAGTAAGC-3'). CrDOF was cloned into pET19b
751
vector, which incorporates an amino terminal Histidine tail (His-CrDOF) and
752
transformed into E. coli BL21 strain. 10 mL of an overnight culture of BL21
753
transformed with His-CrDOF was added to 1 L of LB medium containing 100 µg
754
mL-1 ampicillin and grown at 30ºC until the absorbance at 600 nm reached 0.7.
755
Recombinant gene expression was induced by addition of 1 mM IPTG and
756
incubation during 4 h at 30°C. After centrifugation, the pellet was resuspended
757
in lysis buffer (Tris-HCl 50 mM pH 8; KCl 50 mM; EDTA 1 mM pH 8; DTT 1 mM;
758
MgCl2 10 mM; Glicerol 10% (v/v)) to 3 mL g-1 of cells and broken by sonic
759
disruption. After centrifugation, the pellet was solubilized with buffer IB (Tris-HCl
760
50 mM pH 8; EDTA 10 mM pH 8; Triton X-100 0.5% (v/v); PMSF 0.1 mM),
761
washed twice in the same buffer and once with TALON K buffer (phosphate
762
buffer 0.05 M pH8; KCl 0.3 M). Between each wash, the pellet was sonicated
763
and centrifuged. Finally, the pellet was suspended in TALON buffer including 6
764
M Guanidine chlorhydrate and incubated for two hours. After this period, the
765
protein extract was disrupted by sonication, centrifuged and the supernatant
766
was used to purify CrDOF employing BD TALONTM resin following the
767
recommendations of the manufacturer in denaturing conditions (presence of 6
768
M guanidine chlorhydrate). After elution, proteins were precipitated with ethanol
769
100% (v/v) for 30 minutes at 4°C. The pellet was washed twice (0.3 M
770
guanidine chlorhydrate in 95% (v/v) ethanol and ethanol 90% (v/v) respectively).
771
Finally, the pellet was suspended in SDS-PAGE buffer and separated by
of
database
(5'-
DEGs
were generated
identified
with
with
accession
Venn
Diagram
number
gggcatATGGTAGACGGTGGTTCGCGTG
Plotter
PRJEB6682
-3,
31 Downloaded from www.plantphysiol.org on August 31, 2015 - Published by www.plant.org Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
5'-
772
electrophoresis in 10% (w/v) polyacrylamide gels. 1 mg of purified protein was
773
used to produce antibodies.
774
Protein extraction and immunodetections. Cells from 20 mL of exponentially
775
growing Chlamydomonas cultures were centrifuged and suspended in 3 mL per
776
g of extraction buffer: Tris-HCl 50 mM pH 7.5; PMSF 1mM; DTT 1 mM;
777
Quimostatine, Antipaine and Leupectine at 5 µg mL-1; β-Mercaptoethanol 10
778
mM and 1/1000 SIGMA plant protease inhibitor cocktail. Algae were broken by
779
two cycles of slow freezing to −80°C followed by thawing to room temperature.
780
Cell extracts were centrifuged at 15,000 g for 30 minutes at 4°C and
781
supernatant collected. Protein content was estimated by the Bradford method
782
(Bradford, 1976) using ovalbumin as a standard. Samples were run on SDS-
783
PAGE 10% (w/v) polyacrylamide gels and transferred to nitrocellulose
784
membranes using a Trans-Blot®TurboTMTransfer System (BioRad) according to
785
the manufacturer´s instructions. Western blot analysis was performed using
786
specific antibodies raised against CrDOF recombinant protein. To disaggregate
787
CrDOF complex, total protein was processed by different treatments: Urea 8 M,
788
DTT 0.1 M, Urea 8 M with DTT 0.1 M and Guanidine clorhydrate 6 M.
789
Cromatography. Total protein from CW15 and CrDOFin cultures grown in
790
Sueoka suplemented with NO3- at LD and SD was extracted as above. 1 mg of
791
protein was separated in a Superose 12 10/300 GL column (GE Healthcare). 1
792
mL fractions were collected, precipitated with TCA 10% (w/v) and run in SDS-
793
PAGE gels. Western blot was performed using anti-CrDOF antibodies. Protein
794
complex MM was calculated using a Gel Filtration Markers Kit (SIGMA-
795
MWGF1000) (Supplemental Fig. S2D).
796
Nuclear and protein extraction. Nuclear isolation of Col-0 and 35S:CrDOF (ZT0,
797
ZT8) were done as described in (Lazaro et al., 2012). Protein extraction was
798
carried out in native conditions using a high salt buffer (KCl 1.6 M; HEPES 50
799
mM pH 8; MgCl2 3 mM; DTT 5 mM; glycerol 1% (v/v); PMSF 1 mM) and run in
800
SDS-PAGE gels. Western blot was performed using anti-CrDOF antibodies.
801
Transitory expression in Nicotiana benthamiana
802
BiFC experiments. To verify CrDOF protein interactions in vivo, CrDOF, CDF1
803
and CDF2 complete ORFs were cloned in pYFN43 and pYFC43 to produce
804
fusions to the YTP N-terminal part (YFN-CrDOF, YFN-CDF1 and YFN-CDF2)
805
as well as to the YFP C-terminal part (YFC-CrDOF, YFC-CDF1, YFC-CDF2). 32 Downloaded from www.plantphysiol.org on August 31, 2015 - Published by www.plant.org Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
806
Specific
primers
were
used
for
each
gene
(CrDOF:
807
GGGGACAAGTTTGTACAAAAAAGCAGGCTTCGAAGGAGATAGAACCATGGTAGACGGTGG
808
TTCG-3', 5'-GGGGACCACTTTGTACAAGAAAGCTGGGTCCCTAGCACCCGAGTAAGCGGC-
809
3';
810
GGGGACAAGTTTGTACAAAAAAGCAGGCTTCGAAGGAGATAGAACCATGCTGGAAACTAAA
811
GATCCTGCG-3',
812
GGGGACCACTTTGTACAAGAAAGCTGGGTCTCACATCTGCTCATGGAAATTGAT-3';
813
CDF2:5'GGGGACAAGTTTGTACAAAAAAGCAGGCTTCGAAGGAGATAGAACCATGGCTGAT
814
CCGGCGATTAAGCTC-3',
815
GGGGACCACTTTGTACAAGAAAGCTGGGTCCTATGAGCTCTCATGGAAGTTTGC-3').
816
These constructs were introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain
817
GVG3101 pmp90. 4-week old Nicotiana plants were inoculated with the
818
following combinations: YFN-CrDOF and YFC-CrDOF, YFN-CrDOF and YFC-
819
CDF1, YFN-CrDOF and YFC-CDF2, YFN-CDF2 and YFC-CDF2. As negative
820
controls, pairs of YFC-CrDOF, YFC-CDF1 and YFC-CDF2 with YFN-AKIN10
821
were used. As positive controls, amino and carboxy parts of AKIN10 were used,
822
following protocols previously described (Voinnet et al., 2003). Fluorescent
823
interactions were visualized under a confocal microscope Leica TCS
824
SP2/DMRE using an excitation wavelength of 514 nm.
825
CrDOF binding assays. In order to assess if CrDOF was able to bind to CrCO,
826
CO and FT promoters, a similar transitory expression experiment in N.
827
benthamiana leaves was used. In this experiments, 864 nt from CrCO promoter
828
(5'-
829
GGGGACAAGTTTGTACAAAAAAGCAGGCTTCACCATGGTGCAGGCATGCCGTGGCTCGGC
830
AAG-3',
831
3');
832
GGGGACAAGTTTGTACAAAAAAGCAGGCTTCACCATGGTAGTATAGAGTATCATCATAAAC
833
CC-3' 5'-GGGGACCACTTTGTACAAGAAAGCTGGGTCAATAACTCAGATGTAGTAAGTTTG-
834
3')
835
GGGGACAAGTTTGTACAAAAAAGCAGGCTTCACCATGGATTATATGTATAGATAGATTACC
836
G-3',
837
promoters were cloned first in pDONOR207 and then in pMDC110, which
838
generates carboxyl-terminal fusions to GFP (pCrCO:GFP, pCO:GFP and
839
pFT:GFP). N. benthamiana leaves were inoculated with this constructs, while
840
other set of N.benthamiana leaves were co-inoculated with this constructs and
5'-
5'-
CDF1:
5'-
5'-
5'-GGGGACCACTTTGTACAAGAAAGCTGGGTCTCTCGCGTATAGAGGTGTGGT1
and
kb
from
1
kb
AtCO
from
(5'-
AtFT(5'-
5'-GGGGACCACTTTGTACAAGAAAGCTGGGTCCTTTGATCTTGAACAAACAGG-3')
33 Downloaded from www.plantphysiol.org on August 31, 2015 - Published by www.plant.org Copyright © 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
841
35S:CrDOF. GFP was visualized at 488 nm wavelength. Three independent
842
inoculations were made for each studied condition. For each inoculation, three
843
leaves fragments of the same size were analysed (total of 9 leaves fragments in
844
three biological replicas) in which, eleven or twelve randomly picked nuclei with
845
positive signal were chosen and GFP fluorescence measured using MBF
846
ImageJ. Therefore, signals from more than 100 nuclei were quantified per
847
condition. Two versions of pCrCO including 527 nt (pCrCO2) and 285 nt
848
(pCrCO3) were constructed. Mutations at the binding sites were generated with
849
“Muta-directTM Site directed Mutagenesis” kit from iNtRON Biotechnology
850
following the instructions of the manufacturer.
851
Chlamydomonas Microscopy
852
CW15 and transgenic lines (CrDOFox:YFP) were observed under the confocal
853
microscope (Leica TCS SP2/DMRE) for nuclear localization experiments. To
854
visualize Chlamydomonas nuclei, a SYTO®Blue45 Fluorescent Nucleic Acid
855
Stains (Molecular Probes) was used. Algae were grown in SD conditions in
856
Sueoka media supplemented with NO3- 10 mM until lag phase (3-4 µg mL-1 of
857
chlorophyll). 1 mL was collected by centrifugation (4 mins, 5,500 g) and
858
suspended in 1 mL TBS. 1 µl SYTO®Blue45 and 1 and 5 µl Triton 10% (v/v) for
859
CW15 cells and transgenic lines respectively, were added. After incubation for
860
10 minutes, cells were centrifuged and suspended in 100 µl of the same buffer.
861
Finally, 3µL of cells were mixed with 10 µl of 1.2% (w/v) low point fusion
862
agarose at 30°C. The wavelengths used were 514 nm for YFP and 458 nm for
863
SYTO®Blue 45.
864
Statistical Analysis
865
The statistical data presented in the figures and table are marked with asterisk
866
and are the mean (±SEM) of three biological experiments or two biological
867
experiments (±SE). The statisticals significance between the means of the
868
different samples were calculated using a two-tailed Student´s t-test.
869
Differences observed were considered statistically significant with a pValue