Canal Aberration Assessment on Endoblocks
ORIGINAL PAPER doi: 10.5455/medarh.2017.71.204-207 MED ARCH. 2017 JUN; 71(3): 204-207 RECEIVED: MAY 05, 2017 | ACCEPTED: JUN 22, 2017
Canal Aberration Assessment in Simulated Root Canals: a Comparative Study Selma Jakupovic1, Alma Konjhodzic1, Lajla Hasic Brankovic1, Samra Korac1, Irmina Tahmiscija1, Aida Dzankovic1, Alma Gavranovic Glamoc2
Department of Restorative Dentistry with Endodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina 1
Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina 2
Corresponding author: Ass. Prof. Selma Jakupovic, MDD, PhD. Department of Restorative dentistry and Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Sarajevo, Bolnička 4a, 71 000 Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Phone: +387 33 214-249. ORCID ID:http://www.orcid.org/ 0000-0003-0554-8094. E-mail: [email protected]
ABSTRACT Aim: The aim of this study was to compare time of preparation and canal aberrations in a simulated root canals after using three different rotary systems: Endostar E5, Endostar E3 and T One File Gold. Materials and Methods: A total of 90 endodontic training blocks were used in this study and divided into three groups consisting of 30 each (n = 30). Blocks processing was performed by thirty dentists without any prior experience in rotary instrumentation techniques. In the first group blocks were prepared using Endostar E5, in second one with Endostar E3 and in third one with T One File Gold system. The preparation time was measured. The postoperative image of each block was taken by stereomicroscope and canal aberrations (ledge and instrument fracture) was recorded. Statistical analysis was done by SPSS software. Results: Instrumentation with T One File Gold system is significantly faster compared to instrumentation with Endostar E5 and Endostar E3 systems (p
ORIGINAL PAPER doi: 10.5455/medarh.2017.71.204-207 MED ARCH. 2017 JUN; 71(3): 204-207 RECEIVED: MAY 05, 2017 | ACCEPTED: JUN 22, 2017
Canal Aberration Assessment in Simulated Root Canals: a Comparative Study Selma Jakupovic1, Alma Konjhodzic1, Lajla Hasic Brankovic1, Samra Korac1, Irmina Tahmiscija1, Aida Dzankovic1, Alma Gavranovic Glamoc2
Department of Restorative Dentistry with Endodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina 1
Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina 2
Corresponding author: Ass. Prof. Selma Jakupovic, MDD, PhD. Department of Restorative dentistry and Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Sarajevo, Bolnička 4a, 71 000 Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Phone: +387 33 214-249. ORCID ID:http://www.orcid.org/ 0000-0003-0554-8094. E-mail: [email protected]
ABSTRACT Aim: The aim of this study was to compare time of preparation and canal aberrations in a simulated root canals after using three different rotary systems: Endostar E5, Endostar E3 and T One File Gold. Materials and Methods: A total of 90 endodontic training blocks were used in this study and divided into three groups consisting of 30 each (n = 30). Blocks processing was performed by thirty dentists without any prior experience in rotary instrumentation techniques. In the first group blocks were prepared using Endostar E5, in second one with Endostar E3 and in third one with T One File Gold system. The preparation time was measured. The postoperative image of each block was taken by stereomicroscope and canal aberrations (ledge and instrument fracture) was recorded. Statistical analysis was done by SPSS software. Results: Instrumentation with T One File Gold system is significantly faster compared to instrumentation with Endostar E5 and Endostar E3 systems (p
