Bone Marrow Transplantation (2014), 1–7 © 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0268-3369/14 www.nature.com/bmt
REVIEW
Clinical guidelines for gynecologic care after hematopoietic SCT. Report from the international consensus project on clinical practice in chronic GVHD B Frey Tirri1, P Häusermann2, H Bertz3, H Greinix4, A Lawitschka5, C-P Schwarze6, D Wolff7, JP Halter8, D Dörfler9 and R Moffat10,11 Despite similarities relevant age- and gender-specific issues exist in the care of patients after allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (HSCT). Female genital chronic GVHD (cGVHD) has been markedly underreported in the past but has a significant impact on the patients’ health and quality of life. Data on prevention and treatment of this complication are still limited. Here we present a comprehensive review summarizing the current knowledge, which was discussed during several meetings of the German, Austrian and Swiss Consensus Project on clinical practice in cGVHD. In this report, we provide recommendations for post-transplant gynecological care of cGVHD manifestations agreed upon by all participants. This includes guidelines for diagnosis, prevention, and therapeutic options and topical treatments in female patients with genital cGVHD and hormonal replacement treatment of premature ovarian failure for adult and pediatric patients and underlines the necessity for regular gynecological care and screening programs for women after HSCT. Bone Marrow Transplantation advance online publication, 27 October 2014; doi:10.1038/bmt.2014.242
INTRODUCTION Complications after allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) are mainly due to adverse effects of cytotoxic treatment, acute and chronic GVHD (cGVHD), drug adverse effects or long-lasting immunodeficiency leading to prolonged susceptibility for opportunistic infections.1 To prevent permanent dysfunctions long-term follow-up programs for post-transplant patients have been developed which address age- and gender-specific characteristics.2 Despite many similarities, there are differences in clinical symptoms, prophylaxis and treatment of post-transplant complications between female and male patients. For example, hypogonadism due to premature gonadal failure is highly prevalent after intensive chemotherapy and TBI for conditioning in men and women. However, in women gonadal dysfunction is more pronounced and occurs more often and earlier after HSCT, and the recovery of gonadal function is less likely.3 This report focuses on some post-transplant issues, which are important to consider in female patients after allogeneic HSCT including cGVHD. Data on this consensus process have been presented at the German, Austrian and Swiss Consensus Conference on clinical practice in cGVHD held in Regensburg in 2009 and have been updated in a workshop held in Wiesbaden 2013. Updates were discussed during the cGvHD consortia meetings in 2011 and 2013. The consensus summarizes the currently available evidence for first-line, second-line and topical therapies in cGVHD and provides
practical guidelines for the use of supportive treatment modalities4,5 (summarized in Table 1). The evaluation of evidence and the subsequent recommendations were classified according to the rating system for ancillary therapy and supportive care published by Couriel in 2008 (ref. 27; Table 2). On the basis of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus recommendations for clinical research in cGVHD, the focus of this report was to provide updated and more detailed guidelines for the prevention and treatment of gender-specific problems associated with cGVHD in female patients in daily clinical routine. Strength of recommendation and evidence levels (Table 3) were based on a PubMed-based literature search with subsequent rating by an expert panel approval of the recommendations by all participants of the consensus process. Only English literature was considered. Abstracts from the Bone Marrow Transplantation Tandem meetings, the European Bone Marrow Transplantation meetings and the American Society of Hematology meetings were cited but not included in the evidence rating. Reference lists from the articles retrieved were also evaluated for relevant information. INCIDENCE AND RISK FACTORS FOR FEMALE GENITAL CGVHD The first report on female genital involvement of cGVHD was published in 1982.28 It took another 20 years until this problem became more widely recognized and discussed in the literature.29,30 Women rarely report genital symptoms to
1 Women’s Hospital, Cantonal Hospital Baselland, Bruderholz, Switzerland; 2Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; 3Department of Hematology and Oncology, Albert Ludwigs-University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany; 4Department of Internal Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; 5St Anna Children’s Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; 6University Children’s Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany; 7Department of Medicine III, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; 8Department of Hematology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; 9Department of General Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; 10Clinic for Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland and 11Fertisuisse, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Olten, Switzerland. Correspondence: Dr B Frey Tirri, Women’s Hospital, Cantonal Hospital Baselland, CH-4101 Bruderholz, Switzerland or Dr R Moffat, Clinic for Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital Basel, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland. E-mail:
[email protected] or
[email protected] Received 30 December 2013; revised 5 September 2014; accepted 17 September 2014
Clinical guidelines for gynecologic care after HSCT B Frey Tirri et al
2 Table 1.
Summary of recommendations
Recommendation
Strength
Clinical assessment Asymptomatic women should be offered a gynecological examination once a year6 Symptomatic women should be referred to a gynecologist with experience in GVHD6 Pediatric patients: clinical assessment should be performed by an experienced pediatric gynecologist and includes Tanner staging, inspection of external genitalia and reevaluation every 3–6 months7
BIIa BIIIa AIIIb
Treatment Use of water only for genital hygiene is recommended. Perfumed lotions and soaps and tight underwear and clothes should be avoided8 In case of genital atrophy, use topical estrogen in the form of creams, capsules or estrogen-releasing rings even if the patient is using HT9 In case of genital cGVHD, achieve rapid control of inflammation with topical class IV corticosteroids10–12 Topical calcineurin inhibitors may be suitable for long-term treatment to reduce and replace topical corticosteroids. However, recent meta-analyses did not detect efficacy in patients with lichen planus13 and lichen sclerosus12 Regular intercourse, use of dilatators and surgery can improve vaginal narrowing14 Secondary malignancies of the female genital tract Regular gynecological examination including cervical cytology should be performed once a year15,16 If treatment of suspected genital cGVHD is not successful in a timely manner (6–8 weeks), biopsy of the lesion should be performed to avoid incorrect diagnosis, erroneous treatment and exclude malignancies15,17 Biopsy is recommended for all genital lesions suspicious for dysplasia or malignancy15 HPV vaccination may be offered to young women (12–26 years) after transplantation18
AIIIb BIb BIb CIb CIIIa BIIa AIIa BIIa BIIIa
Premature ovarian failure Women with POF under the age of 40 years should be offered systemic HT irrespective of symptoms if risk factors are inexistent19–21 BIIb until the median age of natural menopause at 51 years The risk for breast cancer after allogeneic HSCT is substantially increased after TBI or local chest radiotherapy.22,23 Early mammographic AIa screening starting at the age of 25 years or 8 years after radiation of the chest or TBI24–26 is therefore recommended Abbreviations: cGVHD = chronic GVHD; HT = hormone therapy; POF = premature ovarian failure.
Table 2.
Strength of recommendation
Category Definition A B C D E
Table 3.
Should always be offered Should generally be offered Evidence for efficacy is insufficient to support for or against, or evidence might not outweigh adverse consequences or cost of the approach. Optional Moderate evidence for lack of efficacy or for adverse outcome supports a recommendation against use. Should generally not be offered Good evidence for lack of efficacy or for adverse outcome supports a recommendation against use. Should never be offered
Quality of evidence supporting the recommendation
Quality of evidence Definition of evidence level I II III
Evidence from one or more properly randomized, controlled trial(s) Evidence from one or more well-designed clinical trial(s) without randomization, from cohort or case-controlled analytic studies (preferable from 41 center), or from multiple time series or dramatic results from uncontrolled experiments Evidence from opinions of respected authorities on the basis of clinical experience, descriptive studies or reports from expert committees
Qualifier for categories I–III a Evidence derived directly from study(s) in GVHD b Evidence derived indirectly from study(s) in analogous or other pertinent disease
their health care providers and rather neglect genital symptoms or sexual problems in the early course of the disease leading to a significant risk of underdiagnosis of genital cGVHD. On the other hand, health care providers might not specifically ask for genital symptoms. However, female genital cGVHD may lead to complications associated with pain, scarring and impairment of sexual life and therefore needs attention. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2014), 1 – 7
Currently, the actual incidence of female genital cGVHD is unknown. Initially it was estimated to be as low as 3% in BM recipients. However, recent publications mention incidence rates of up to 49% in a mixed population of BM and PBSC recipients.31 Systematic gynecological care detecting also milder forms, more frequent use of PBSC and better supportive care strategies for other post-transplant complications may explain the increase in frequency of cGVHD overall32 including female genital cGVHD. © 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited
Clinical guidelines for gynecologic care after HSCT B Frey Tirri et al
3 Median time from HSCT to initial presentation of female genital cGVHD is between 7 to 10 months,29 but late onset more than 1 year after HSCT is not uncommon.10,31 Indeed, the exact time of onset often is unclear and both, patients and physicians, especially in sexually inactive patients, can delay detection of gynecological signs and symptoms. Isolated female genital cGVHD is rare but does occur.6,17 In 68% cases cGVHD affects the vulva, whereas in 26%, both vulva and vagina are involved.11 Vulvar cGVHD usually precedes vaginal cGVHD. In our experience, topical treatment of vulvar cGVHD does not prevent the development of vaginal manifestations. Often female genital cGVHD is associated with cGVHD manifestations in other organs, especially skin and other mucosal surfaces such as mouth, eyes and gastrointestinal tract, and may appear even a long time after the initial manifestation of cGVHD.27 This sequence of events underlines the need for regular gynecological care. Therefore, we recommend a gynecological examination once a year in asymptomatic women6 (BIIa). Symptomatic women should be referred to a gynecologist with experience in GVHD6 (BIIIa). The risk for female genital cGVHD seems to be higher after HSCT with PBSC compared with BM.33 Type of conditioning, donor, parity, age, GVHD prophylaxis or vaginal infection at the time of HSCT do not appear to have an impact on incidence of genital cGVHD.29,31 However, genital atrophy due to estrogen deficiency seems to be a confounding factor for female genital cGVHD.29 SYMPTOMS AND CLINICAL PRESENTATION OF GENITAL CGVHD Pain or burning, dysuria, a feeling of redness and swelling, perineal and perianal soreness, dryness and dyspareunia despite adequate systemic and/or topical hormone therapy (HT) are nonspecific symptoms of female genital cGVHD. Patients, who are sexually active, may recognize symptoms earlier. Female genital cGVHD causing complete vaginal obstruction resulting in hematocolpos or hematometra can manifest as cyclic pain and amenorrhea in women taking HT34,35 or as difficulty while voiding in case of vulvar adhesions. In 2005, NIH recommendations for diagnosing and staging of female genital cGVHD were published.36 According to these, lichen planus-like features and vaginal scarring or stenosis are diagnostic signs of genital cGVHD that do not require biopsy. Erosions, fissures and ulcers are distinctive signs requiring exclusion of infection, drug effects, malignancy or other causes. The NIH recommendations include a score (Table 4) on the basis of severity of symptoms and clinical signs, ranging from score 0 for asymptomatic women to score 3 for women with severe symptoms. The score published by Stratton10 (Table 5) grades female genital cGVHD on the basis of clinical signs but not symptoms. One of the limitations of the NIH recommendations is that genital atrophy caused by premature ovarian failure (POF) is a common finding and distinguishing atrophic vaginitis from mild female Table 4. Scoring for female genital chronic GVHD (cGVHD) according to NIH recommendations for diagnosis and staging of female genital cGVHD36 Score 0 No symptoms Score 1 Symptomatic with mild signs on exam and no effect on coitus and minimal discomfort with gynecologic exam Score 2 Symptomatic with moderate signs on exam and with mild dysparunia or discomfort with gynecologic exam Score 3 Symptomatic with advanced signs (stricture, labial agglutination or severe ulceration) and severe pain with coitus or inability to insert vaginal speculum
© 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited
genital cGVHD is challenging. Second, reporting symptoms of dyspareunia and discomfort with gynecologic exam are subjective. Affected women usually have difficulties classifying the extent of pain perceived. Third, sexually inactive women may not report symptoms like dyspareunia but might have severe signs of female genital cGVHD. HISTOPATHOLOGY AND DIAGNOSIS Histological findings of female genital cGVHD are consistent with mucosal and skin manifestations in classic cGVHD,17,30,35 with signs of chronic and acute inflammation within the subepithelial stroma and epithelium, that is, vacuolar degeneration of the basal layer, apoptotic keratinocytes and superficial perivascular lymphohistiocytic infiltrates. According to NIH recommendations,36 biopsy is not required for diagnosis if lichen planus-like features or vaginal scarring or stenosis (diagnostic signs) are present. In case of vaginal erosions, fissures and ulcers (distinctive signs) biopsy may be required for diagnosing cGVHD, if cGVHD has not been confirmed at another organ manifestation. Shulman et al.17 recommend biopsy in suspected cGVHD to avoid incorrect diagnosis and erroneous treatment, but acknowledges that histopathologic examination has limitations. We prefer a trial of treatment after exclusion of infection, drug or allergic reactions and dysplasia in cases with distinctive signs (corresponding to moderate genital cGVHD in Stratton’s scoring). If the treatment is not successful in a timely manner (6–8 weeks), we perform a biopsy of the lesions to exclude malignancies15 (AIIa). DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSES Genital infections produce signs of inflammation such as redness and soreness as in mild cGVHD but typically cause vaginal discharge and alter vaginal pH. Leukocytes, clue cells or yeast can be identified by microscopy in wet mounts of vaginal fluid samples and cultures should be obtained to identify the pathogen. HSV and VZV infection typically cause vesicular and ulcerative lesions of the external genitalia. Viral culture and molecular assays are validated methods for direct diagnosis of HSV and other viral infections. Allergic reactions to topical remedies and sanitary products and eczema can cause vulvar erythema resembling cGVHD. Early stages of genital lichen sclerosus often cause erythema and edema that usually begin
Table 5. Severity scoring for female genital cGVHD disease according to Stratton10 Severity score Grade I (minimal)
Grade II (moderate)
Grade III (severe)
Findings on clinical examination Generalized erythema and edema of vulvar structures Patchy erythema of mucosa and glandular structures of vulvar vestibule Erythema around openings of vestibular (Bartholin’s and Skene’s) glands Grade I findings plus Erosions of mucosal surfaces of the vulva Fissures in vulvar folds (that is, interlabial sulci; fourchette) Grade II findings plus Agglutination of clitoral hood Introital stenosis Vaginal synechiae Hematocolpos or complete vaginal closure Fasciitis or spasticity of levator sling
Bone Marrow Transplantation (2014), 1 – 7
Clinical guidelines for gynecologic care after HSCT B Frey Tirri et al
4 around the periclitoral hood accompanied by the typical porcelain-white lesions that are easily distinguishable from genital cGVHD.37 Genital lichen simplex chronicus is considered an atopic disorder caused by excessive scratching leading to lichenification of the vulva. The skin is leathery and thickened. Fissures can occur in severe cases.38 Intraepithelial dysplasia and squamous cell carcinoma, which is by far the most common cancer of the female genital tract, can be detected by visual inspection after application of acetic acid.39 Paget’s disease, melanoma and basal cell carcinoma are rare malignancies of the female genital tract. Biopsy is recommended for all lesions suspicious for dysplasia or malignancy. Burning, dryness, tenderness and pruritus are common symptoms of both genital cGVHD and genital atrophy due to estrogen deficiency. In both, sexual activity is often compromised and physical examination may be painful. Typical signs of mild cGVHD are generalized patchy erythema, edema of vulvar structures and reticulated leukoplakia. In contrast to cGVHD, atrophic epithelium is shiny, pale and frail and tends to bleed on contact. The vaginal pH is alkaline. Clinical signs of atrophic vaginitis are very similar to those of mild cGVHD.8 Atrophy often accompanies genital cGVHD but in contrast to cGVHD, local estrogen treatment alone is effective in these patients. TREATMENT Treatment of female genital cGvHD is based on the following principles: (1) Reduce mechanical or chemical irritation of the genital skin by using only warm water for genital hygiene. Avoid perfumed lotions, soaps and tight underwear and clothes8 (AIIIb). (2) Use topical estrogen in form of creams, capsules or estrogenreleasing rings even if the patient is using systemic HT9 (BIb). Topical estrogen treatment increases epithelial thickness and makes the vaginal epithelium more resilient. (3) Achieve control of GvHD-related inflammation with topical class IV corticosteroids (BIb). We suggest the use of clobetasol propionate (Dermovate) ointment once daily at bedtime for 4 weeks as first-line therapy in newly diagnosed cGVHD and in case of flare-ups. (4) Topical calcineurin inhibitors, such as tacrolimus (Protopic) and pimecrolimus (Elidel) may be suitable for long-term treatment to reduce and replace topical corticosteroids10–12 (CIb). However, recent meta-analyses did not detect efficacy in patients with lichen planus13 and lichen sclerosus.12 (5) Regular intercourse or use of dilators can prevent vaginal narrowing and stenosis14 (CIIIa). Prevention of vaginal stenosis is important to facilitate cervical cytology screening. On the basis of our experience, it is better to avoid intercourse, dilation or surgical lysis of synechiae when inflammation is acute because this may result in aggravation of inflammation. Patients hardly tolerate vaginal examination and dilation in this situation. Successful control of inflammation results in significant reduction of pain, redness and swelling, thus enabling gentle intercourse or use of dilators. Persistent vaginal synechiae in spite of intercourse or use of dilators are easily separated manually under anesthesia, incision is rarely necessary.40 However, recurrence of synechiae is common, especially after surgery. Therefore, we encourage patients to perform digital self-examinations several times a week. Regular intercourse, the use of dilators or estrogen-releasing rings (not available in all countries) can prevent recurrence as well. In our experience the patients appreciate if either their gynecologist provides the dilator set or if they can order it anonymously by internet. However, some patients might be reluctant to perform self-examinations or dilation. (6) Photodocumentation is an easy and painless way of monitoring response to treatment. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2014), 1 – 7
SECONDARY MALIGNANCIES OF THE FEMALE GENITAL TRACT AFTER HSCT Secondary solid tumors are a well-known severe post-transplant complication.24,41 Prolonged use of immunosuppressive drugs to treat cGVHD and severity of cGVHD are major risk factors for the development of human papillomavirus (HPV)-related dysplasia15 and squamous cell carcinoma of the female genital tract.42 We recommend performing regular gynecological examination including cervical cytology once a year15,16 (BIIa). In the case of suspicious genital lesions, colposcopy and biopsy are recommended (BIIa).15 Given the relevance of HPV infection in the pathogenesis of cervical cancer, HPV vaccination may be offered to young women after transplantation43,44 (BIIIa).The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommends HPV vaccination for immunocompromised persons aged 12–26 years if they have not already received any or all vaccine doses.18 However, efficacy data are not yet available. POF, SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION AND FERTILITY ISSUES After allogeneic HSCT many women suffer from POF depending on conditioning regimen, pretransplant chemotherapy, the age at HSCT and post-transplant complications.45,46 Only a minority (o 5%) of these patients recover ovarian function after HSCT for a limited period of time before entering early menopause.47,48 Toxicity-reduced conditioning regimens applied in younger patients may reduce the incidence of POF but systematic review is currently pending.49 POF is associated with symptoms of estrogen deficiency, such as hot flushes, night sweats, mood disorders, sleep disorders, lack of concentration, arthralgia, impaired sexual function50 and loss of reproductive potential, all of which negatively impact quality of life.51,52 Lack of estrogen at an early age prevents the development of secondary sex characteristics, increases the risk for osteoporosis,53 cognitive impairment54 and cardiovascular disease55–58 that are frequently observed in women after HSCT.59,60 However, attributing these diseases to POF is difficult because their occurrence are influenced by other factors, such as the use of steroids, calcineurin inhibitors, selective serotonin receptor inhibitors and proton pump inhibitors, hyperlipidemia or vitamin D deficiency. Estrogen replacement significantly alleviates postmenopausal vasomotor symptoms,61 improves vaginal mucosal architecture9 and bone density,62 thus increasing quality of life. Women with POF under the age of 40 years should be offered systemic HT irrespective of symptoms until the median age of natural menopause at 51 years provided there are no contraindications, such as history of breast or endometrial cancer, thromboembolic disorders, cardiovascular disease, porphyria or severe liver disease (BIIb).19–21 Symptomatic women older than 40 years may benefit from HT as well. HT has been viewed negatively after publication of the results of the women’s health initiative.63 However, the results of the women’s health initiative may not be representative for young women with POF after high-dose chemotherapy. Benefits and risks of HT should be discussed individually with each patient preferably by a gynecological endocrinologist to prevent complications. The risk for breast cancer after allogeneic HSCT is substantially increased after TBI or local chest radiotherapy.22,23 Therefore, early mammography screening starting at the age of 25 years or 8 years after radiation of the chest or TBI16,25,26 (AIa) is recommended. In the absence of guidelines on the basis of randomized trials for women with chemotherapy-induced POF, transdermal (50 μg estradiol/24 h) or oral estrogen (2 mg estradiol) can be given. If the uterus is present, cyclic or continuous progesterone (for example, 170 μg norethisterone acetate/24 h by transdermal route or 0.5 mg norethisterone acetate per day by oral route) should be added. Alternatively, low-dose combined oral contraceptives may © 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited
Clinical guidelines for gynecologic care after HSCT B Frey Tirri et al
5 be used for HT. To avoid menopausal symptoms during the 7-day hormone-free break, combined oral contraceptives can be given continuously. Women suffering from diminished libido, presumably due to estrogen and androgen deficiency, might benefit from testosterone therapy. Low-dose transdermal testosterone (300 μg/day) added to an estrogen/progesterone hormone therapy has been shown to improve hypoactive sexual desire disorder in surgically menopausal women.64 Reliable data on long-term safety and efficacy of treatments improving sexual dysfunction in women with chemotherapy-induced POF are lacking. Selective estrogen receptor modulators (for example, tamoxifen, raloxifene) preventing bone loss may be an option in women with POF after transplantation who prefer not to take estrogens or who have a high risk for breast cancer.65 Notably, selective estrogen receptor modulators can aggravate genital atrophy and vasomotor symptoms.66 There are no data to support the efficacy of phytoestrogens67 and black cohosh68 to relieve menopausal symptoms. Therefore, this treatment cannot be recommended as an alternative for HT. Selective serotonin receptor inhibitors alleviate vasomotor symptoms and improve sleep disorders and can be used instead of HT.69 Fertility is clearly impaired after HSCT and the reported overall conception rate is o1%.70 Some women achieve pregnancy and live birth even after high-dose chemotherapy and TBI and pregnancies are likely to have successful outcomes.71 In fact, pregnancies have been reported despite the presence of cGVHD, indicating that cGVHD and its therapy does not always impair fertility.70,71 Nonetheless, data on spontaneous and assisted conception are scarce. Women and girls facing HSCT should have fertility preservation counseling.72 PEDIATRIC ASPECTS Lesions of genital cGVHD in children and adolescents may be similar to those of adults but systematic reviews of incidence, risk factors, treatment and outcome of genital cGVHD in children and adolescents are lacking. Underdiagnosis may be higher because symptoms like genital irritation, dryness and pain are rarely mentioned by children. Young girls after HSCT are particularly vulnerable to vulvar or vaginal irritation and infection because of poor local immune system and thin genital epithelium due to the lack of estrogen. Frequent contact with irritants (bubble bath, wet wipes and soaps), the fact that the vaginal orifice is less well protected by the labia,73 its proximity to the anus and poor hygiene add to the risk of vulvovaginitis. Microbiological and viral findings may be A/B beta hemolytic Streptococcus, Staphylococcus aureus, Haemophilus influenzae, Escherichia coli, Enteroccus faecalis, Yersinia and Shigella and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Chlamydia, Gardnerella, Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma, Candida albicans (often) and glabrata, BK Virus, HSV 1/2, HPV, VZV, Pinworms (Enterobius vermicularis).74,75 Clinical assessment should be performed by an experienced pediatric gynecologist/endocrinologist and includes Tanner staging, inspection of external genitalia and reevaluation every 3–6 months7 (AIIIb). Appropriate patient history should include genital hygiene practices and previous treatments. Vaginal swabs for cultures and virus isolation should be taken from the lower vagina. Genital cGvHD lesions may be similar to those of adults. Late onset of symptoms such as vaginal obstruction causing hematocolpos at the time of menarche illustrates the importance of longterm follow-up. Underlying diseases like Fanconi anemia with higher risk of secondary malignancies have to be considered. Treatment recommendations follow those of adults. There are no data about absorption of topical drugs in children. In general, children and their parents should be instructed about proper genital hygiene, which includes the use of alcohol- and perfume-free toilet wipes, wiping from front to back after © 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited
Table 6.
HT in pediatric patients for the induction of menarche
Time from onset
Drug
Month Month Month Month
Estradiol valerate 0.25 mg/day oral Estradiol valerate 0.50 mg/day oral Estradiol valerate 1.00 mg/day oral Estradiol valerate 1.50 mg/day oral, cyclic 3 weeks 1 week discontinued Combined therapy with Estradiol valerate/Dihydrogesteron
1–6 7–12 13–18 19–24
After month 25
Dose
urinating, frequently changing the diapers and avoiding constipation.76,77 In 70 percent of cases hypogonadism is a consequence of stem cell therapy in girls. This is predominantly due to damaged ovaries, resulting in primary hypergonadotropic hypogonadism. In some cases, central hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism can result from cranial radiation. Therefore a high percentage of girls will benefit from HT. Starting at age 8 pubertal status, growth and serum levels of luteinizing hormone, follicule stimulating hormone and estradiol of the girl should be evaluated every 6 months. Estrogen therapy for induction of puberty, maximizing growth and development of secondary sex characteristics should begin no later than age 15 and not before age 12 (refs 7,78; AIIIb). In pubertal girls, the starting dose of HT depends on the volume of the uterus and the Tanner stage. A possible treatment scheme is shown in Table 6. After the end of puberty, a short discontinuation of HT is encouraged to monitor if ovarian function has recovered. Once contraception is needed or desired, oral contraceptives can be given instead of HT. CONCLUSIONS Female genital cGVHD, secondary genital malignancies, POF and loss of fertility are frequent complications after HSCT. Genital symptoms are rarely reported spontaneously by patients. Therefore health care workers should ask patients for symptoms. Local corticosteroids are the mainstay of treatment of genital cGVHD. Careful surgical interventions may become necessary to improve severe forms of genital cGVHD. Women with genital cGVHD are at an increased risk of developing squamous cell carcinoma and need regular pap smears and meticulous examinations of suspicious genital lesions by experts. Almost all women will experience POF and infertility after HSCT. Estrogen/progesterone replacement should be considered for women younger than 40 years. Women between 40 and 50 years might benefit from HT depending on their individual risk for breast cancer and vascular complications. Women and girls facing HSCT should be offered fertility preservation counseling. More prospective studies are needed to improve our knowledge on genital cGVHD and POF. CONFLICT OF INTEREST The authors declare no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES 1 Khera N, Storer B, Flowers ME, Carpenter PA, Inamoto Y, Sandmaier BM et al. Nonmalignant late effects and compromised functional status in survivors of hematopoietic cell transplantation. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30: 71–77. 2 Rizzo JD, Wingard JR, Tichelli A, Lee SJ, Van Lint MT, Burns LJ et al. Recommended screening and preventive practices for long-term survivors after hematopoietic cell transplantation: joint recommendations of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, and the American Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2006; 12: 138–151.
Bone Marrow Transplantation (2014), 1 – 7
Clinical guidelines for gynecologic care after HSCT B Frey Tirri et al
6 3 Mertens AC, Ramsay NK, Kouris S, Neglia JP. Patterns of gonadal dysfunction following bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 1998; 22: 345–350. 4 Wolff D, Gerbitz A, Ayuk F, Kiani A, Hildebrandt GC, Vogelsang GB et al. Consensus conference on clinical practice in chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD): firstline and topical treatment of chronic GVHD. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2010; 16: 1611–1628. 5 Wolff D, Schleuning M, von Harsdorf S, Bacher U, Gerbitz A, Stadler M et al. Consensus Conference on Clinical Practice in Chronic GVHD: Second-Line Treatment of Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2011; 17: 1–17. 6 Couriel D, Carpenter PA, Cutler C, Bolaňos-Maede J, Treister NS, Gea-Banacloche J et al. Ancillary therapy and supportive care of chronic graft-versus-host disease: national institutes of health consensus development project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic Graft-ver sus-host disease: V. Ancillary Therapy and Supportive Care Working Group Report. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2006; 12: 375–396. 7 Saenger P, Wikland KA, Conway GS, Davenport M, Gravholt CH, Hintz R et al. Recommendations for the diagnosis and management of Turner syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001; 86: 3061–3069. 8 Pandit L, Ouslander JG. Postmenopausal vaginal atrophy and atrophic vaginitis. Am J Med Sci 1997; 314: 228–231. 9 Suckling J, Lethaby A, Kennedy R. Local oestrogen for vaginal atrophy in postmenopausal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006: : CD001500. 10 Stratton P, Turner ML, Childs R, Barrett J, Bishop M, Wayne AS et al. Vulvovaginal chronic graft-versus-host disease with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110: 1041–1049. 11 Shanis D, Merideth M, Pulanic TK, Savani BN, Battiwalla M, Stratton P. Female long-term survivors after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: evaluation and management. Semin Hematol 2012; 49: 83–93. 12 Chi CC, Kirtschig G, Baldo M, Lewis F, Wang SH, Wojnarowska F. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on topical interventions for genital lichen sclerosus. J Am Acad Dermatol 2012; 67: 305–312. 13 Cheng S, Kirtschig G, Cooper S, Thornhill M, Leonardi-Bee J, Murphy R. Interventions for erosive lichen planus affecting mucosal sites. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 2: CD008092. 14 Hayes EC, Rock JA. Treatment of vaginal agglutination associated with chronic graft-versus-host disease. Fertil Steril 2002; 78: 1125–1126. 15 Savani BN, Stratton P, Shenoy A, Kozanas E, Goodman S, Barrett AJ. Increased risk of cervical dysplasia in long-term survivors of allogeneic stem cell transplantation--implications for screening and HPV vaccination. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2008; 14: 1072–1075. 16 Majhail NS, Rizzo JD, Lee SJ, Aljurf M, Atsuta Y, Bonfim C et al. Recommended screening and preventive practices for long-term survivors after hematopoietic cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2012; 18: 348–371. 17 Shulman HM, Kleiner D, Lee SJ, Morton T, Pavletic SZ, Farmer E et al. Histopathologic diagnosis of chronic graft-versus-host disease: National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Clinical Trials in Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: II. Pathology Working Group Report. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2006; 12: 31–47. 18 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended immunization schedules for persons aged 0-18 years and adults aged 19 years and older—United States, 2013. MMWR Surveill Summ 2013; 62: 1. 19 Vujovic S, Brincat M, Erel T, Gambacciani M, Lambrinoudaki I, Moen MH et al. EMAS position statement: Managing women with premature ovarian failure. Maturitas 2010; 67: 91–93. 20 North American Menopause S. The 2012 hormone therapy position statement of: The North American Menopause Society. Menopause 2012; 19: 257–271. 21 Rocca WA, Grossardt BR, Shuster LT. Oophorectomy, menopause, estrogen treatment, and cognitive aging: clinical evidence for a window of opportunity. Brain Res 2011; 1379: 188–198. 22 Friedman DL, Rovo A, Leisenring W, Locasciulli A, Flowers ME, Tichelli A et al. Increased risk of breast cancer among survivors of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: a report from the FHCRC and the EBMT-Late Effect Working Party. Blood. 2008; 111: 939–526. 23 Castellino SM, Geiger AM, Mertens AC, Leisenring WM, Tooze JA, Goodman P et al. Morbidity and mortality in long-term survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Blood 2011; 117: 1806–1816. 24 Rizzo JD, Curtis RE, Socié G, Sobocinski KA, Gilbert E, Landgren O et al. Solid cancers after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Blood 2009; 113: 1175–1183. 25 Landier W, Bhatia S, Eshelman DA, Forte KJ, Sweeney T, Hester AL et al. Development of risk-based guidelines for pediatric cancer survivors: the Children's Oncology Group Long-Term Follow-Up Guidelines from the Children's Oncology
Bone Marrow Transplantation (2014), 1 – 7
26
27 28
29
30
31
32 33
34 35
36
37 38 39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
Group Late Effects Committee and Nursing Discipline. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 4979–4990. Ng AK, Garber JE, Diller LR, Birdwell RL, Feng Y, Neuberg DS et al. Prospective study of the efficacy of breast magnetic resonance imaging and mammographic screening in survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31: 2282–2288. Couriel DR. Ancillary and supportive care in chronic graft-versus-host disease. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 2008; 21: 291–307. Corson SL, Sullivan K, Batzer F, August C, Storb R, Thomas ED. Gynecologic manifestations of chronic graft-versus-host disease. Obstet Gynecol 1982; 60: 488–492. Spinelli S, Chiodi S, Costantini S, Van Lint MT, Raiola AM, Ravera GB et al. Female genital tract graft-versus-host disease following allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Haematologica 2003; 88: 1163–1168. Spiryda LB, Laufer MR, Soiffer RJ, Antin JA. Graft-versus-host disease of the vulva and/or vagina: diagnosis and treatment. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Dec 2003; 9: 760–765. Zantomio D, Grigg AP, MacGregor L, Panek-Hudson Y, Szer J, Ayton R. Female genital tract graft-versus-host disease: incidence, risk factors and recommendations for management. Bone Marrow Transplant 2006; 38: 567–572. Lee SJ, Vogelsang G, Flowers ME. Chronic graft-versus-host disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2003; 9: 215–233. Flowers ME, Parker PM, Johnston LJ, Matos AV, Storer B, Bensinger WI et al. Comparison of chronic graft-versus-host disease after transplantation of peripheral blood stem cells versus bone marrow in allogenic recipients: a long-term follow-up of a randomized trial. Blood 2002; 100: 415–419. Yanai N, Shufaro Y, Or R, Meirow D. Vaginal outflow tract obstruction by graftversus-host reaction. Bone Marrow Transplant 1999; 24: 811–812. DeLord C, Treleaven J, Shepherd J, Saso R, Powles RL. Vaginal stenosis following allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for acute myeloid leukaemia. Bone Marrow Transplant 1999; 23: 523–525. Filipovich AH, Weisdorf D, Pavletic S, Socié G, Wingard JR, Lee SJ et al. National Institutes of Health consensus development project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic graft-versus-host disease: I. Diagnosis and staging working group report. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2005; 11: 945–956. Fistarol SK, Itin PH. Diagnosis and treatment of lichen sclerosus: an update. Am J Clin Dermatol 2013; 14: 27–47. O'Connell TX, Shankar Nathan L, Satmary WA, Goldstein AT. Non-neoplastic epithelial disorders of the vulva. Am Fam Physician 2008; 77: 321–326. Visual inspection with acetic acid for cervical-cancer screening: test qualities in a primary-care setting. University of Zimbabwe/JHPIEGO Cervical Cancer Project. Lancet 1999; 353: 869–873. Costantini S, Di Capua E, Bosi S, Chiodi S, Spinelli S. The management of severe vaginal obstruction from genital chronic graft-versus-host disease: diagnosis, surgical technique and follow-up. Minerva Ginecol 2006; 58: 11–16. Kolb HJ, Socié G, Duell T, Van Lint MT, Tichelli A, Apperley JF et al. Malignant neoplasms in long-term survivors of bone marrow transplantation. Late Effects Working Party of the European Cooperative Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation and the European Late Effect Project Group. Ann Intern Med 1999; 131: 738–744. Curtis RE, Metayer C, Rizzo JD, Socié G, Sobocinski KA, Flowers ME et al. Impact of chronic GVHD therapy on the development of squamous-cell cancers after hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation: an international case-control study. Blood 2005; 105: 3802–3811. Savani BN, Goodman S, Barrett AJ. Can routine posttransplant HPV vaccination prevent commonly occurring epithelial cancers after allogeneic stem cell transplantation? Clin Cancer Res 2009; 15: 2219–2221. Hilgendorf I, Freund M, Jilg W, Einsele H, Gea-Banacloche J, Greinix H et al. Vaccination of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: report from the international consensus conference on clinical practice in chronic GVHD. Vaccine 2011; 29: 2825–455 2833. Socié G, Salooja N, Cohen A, Rovelli A, Carreras E, Locasciulli A et al. Non malignant late effects after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Blood 2003; 101: 3373–3385. Tauchmanovà L, Selleri C, De Rosa G, Sammartino A, Di Carlo C, Musella T et al. Estrogen-progestin therapy in women after stem cell transplant: our experience and literature review. Menopause 2007; 14: 320–330. Sanders JE, Buckner CD, Amos D, Levy W, Appelbaum FR, Doney K et al. Ovarian function following marrow transplantation for aplastic anemia or leukemia. J Clin Oncol 1988; 6: 813–818. Dvorak CC, Gracia CR, Sanders JE, Cheng EY, Baker KS, Pulsipher MA et al. NCI, NHLBI/PBMTC first international conference on late effects after pediatric hematopoietic cell transplantation: endocrine challenges-thyroid dysfunction, growth impairment, bone health, & reproductive risks. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2011; 17: 1725–1738.
© 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited
Clinical guidelines for gynecologic care after HSCT B Frey Tirri et al
7 49 Cheng YC, Saliba RM, Rondon G, Giralt SA, Lu KH, Bodurka DC et al. Low prevalence of premature ovarian failure in women given reduced-intensity conditioning regimens for hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. Haematologica 2005; 90: 1725–1726. 50 Thygesen KH, Schjodt I, Jarden M. The impact of hematopoetic stem cell transplantation on sexuality: a systematic review of the literature. Bone Marrow Transplant 2012; 47: 716–724. 51 Piccioni P, Scirpa P, D'Emilio I, Sora F, Scarciglia M, Laurenti L et al. Hormonal replacement therapy after stem cell transplantation. Maturitas 2004; 49: 327–333. 52 Absolom K, Eiser C, Turner L, Ledger W, Ross R, Davies H et al. Ovarian failure following cancer treatment: current management and quality of life. Hum Reprod 2008; 23: 2506–2512. 53 Anasti JN, Kalantaridou SN, Kimzey LM, Defensor RA, Nelson LM. Bone loss in young women with karyotypically normal spontaneous premature ovarian failure. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 91: 12–15. 54 Rocca WA, Bower JH, Maraganore DM, Ahlskog JE, Grossardt BR, de Andrade M et al. Increased risk of cognitive impairment or dementia in women who underwent oophorectomy before menopause. Neurology 2007; 69: 1074–1083. 55 Atsma F, Bartelink ML, Grobbee DE, van der Schouw YT. Postmenopausal status and early menopause as independent risk factors for cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis. Menopause 2006; 13: 265–279. 56 Parker WH, Broder MS, Chang E, Feskanich D, Farquhar C, Liu Z et al. Ovarian conservation at the time of hysterectomy and long-term health outcomes in the nurses' health study. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113: 1027–1037. 57 Kalantaridou SN, Naka KK, Papanikolaou E, Kazakos N, Kravariti M, Calis KA et al. Impaired endothelial function in young women with premature ovarian failure: normalization with hormone therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004; 89: 3907–3913. 58 Howard BV, Kuller L, Langer R, Manson JE, Allen C, Assaf A et al. Risk of cardiovascular disease by hysterectomy status, with and without oophorectomy: the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study. Circulation 2005; 111: 1462–1470. 59 Hautmann AH, Elad S, Lawitschka A, Greinix H, Bertz H, Halter J et al. Metabolic bone diseases in patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: report from the Consensus Conference on Clinical Practice in chronic graftversus-host disease. Transpl Int 2011; 24: 867–879. 60 Tichelli A, Bucher C, Rovo A, Stussi G, Stern M, Paulussen M et al. Premature cardiovascular disease after allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. Blood 2007; 110: 3463–3471. 61 Maclennan AH, Broadbent JL, Lester S, Moore V. Oral oestrogen and combined oestrogen/progestogen therapy versus placebo for hot flushes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004: : CD002978. 62 Cauley JA, Robbins J, Chen Z, Cummings SR, Jackson RD, LaCroix AZ et al. Effects of estrogen plus progestin on risk of fracture and bone mineral density: the Women's Health Initiative randomized trial. JAMA 2003; 290: 1729–1738.
© 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited
63 Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL, LaCroix AZ, Kooperberg C, Stefanick ML et al. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results from the Women's Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002; 288: 321–333. 64 Braunstein GD, Sundwall DA, Katz M, Shifren JL, Buster JE, Simon JA et al. Safety and efficacy of a testosterone patch for the treatment of hypoactive sexual desire disorder in surgically menopausal women: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Arch Intern Med 2005; 165: 1582–1589. 65 Bouxsein ML, Chen P, Glass EV, Kallmes DF, Delmas PD, Mitlak BH. Teriparatide and raloxifene reduce the risk of new adjacent vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Results from two randomized controlled trials. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91: 1329–1338. 66 Vardy MD, Lindsay R, Scotti RJ, Mikhail M, Richart RM, Nieves J et al. Short-term urogenital effects of raloxifene, tamoxifen, and estrogen. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189: 81–88. 67 Cassidy A, Albertazzi P, Lise Nielsen I, Hall W, Williamson G, Tetens I et al. Critical review of health effects of soya bean phyto-oestrogens in postmenopausal women. Proc Nutr Soc 2006; 65: 76–92. 68 Leach MJ, Moore V. Black cohosh (Cimicifuga spp.) for menopausal symptoms. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 9: CD007244. 69 Stearns V, Slack R, Greep N, Henry-Tilman R, Osborne M, Bunnell C et al. Paroxetine is an effective treatment for hot flashes: results from a prospective randomized clinical trial. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 6919–6930. 70 Salooja N, Szydlo RM, Socié G, Rio B, Chatterjee R, Ljungman P et al. Pregnancy outcomes after peripheral blood or bone marrow transplantation: a retrospective survey. Lancet 2001; 358: 271–276. 71 Loren AW, Chow E, Jacobsohn DA, Gilleece M, Halter J, Joshi S et al. Pregnancy after hematopoietic cell transplantation: a report from the late effects working committee of the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR). Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2011; 17: 157–166. 72 Jeruss JS, Woodruff TK. Preservation of fertility in patients with cancer. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 902–911. 73 Pierce AM, Hart CA. Vulvovaginitis: causes and management. Arch Dis Child 1992; 67: 509–512. 74 Ranđelović G, Mladenović V, Ristić L, Otašević S, Branković S, Mladenović-Antić S et al. Microbiological aspects of vulvovaginitis in prepubertal girls. Eur J Pediatr 2012; 171: 1203–1208. 75 Bumbulienė Ž, Venclavičiūtė K, Ramašauskaite D, Arlauskiene A, Bumbul E, Drąsutiene G. Microbiological findings of vulvovaginitis in prepubertal girls. Postgrad Med J 2014; 90: 8–12. 76 Dei M, Di Maggio F, Di Paolo G, Bruni V. Vulvovaginitis in childhood. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2010; 24: 129–137. 77 Van Eyk N, Allen L, Giesbrecht E, Jamieson MA, Kives S, Morris M et al. Pediatric vulvovaginal disorders: a diagnostic approach and review of the literature. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2009; 31: 850–862. 78 Sybert VP, McCauley E. Turner’s syndrome. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 1227–1238.
Bone Marrow Transplantation (2014), 1 – 7