JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL FOOD J Med Food 17 (10) 2014, 1129–1133 # Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., and Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition DOI: 10.1089/jmf.2013.0063

Composition and Antiproliferative Effect of Essential Oil of Origanum vulgare Against Tumor Cell Lines Karine Rech Begnini,1 Fernanda Nedel,1,2 Rafael Guerra Lund,1–3 Pedro Henrique de Azambuja Carvalho,3 Maria Regina Alves Rodrigues,4 Fa´tima Tereza Alves Beira,2 and Francisco Augusto Burkert Del-Pino2 1

Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Institute of Biology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. 2 Post-Graduate Program in Dentistry, 3Pelotas Dental School, and 4Institute of Chemistry and Geosciences, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. ABSTRACT Cancer is a leading cause of death and is responsible for one in eight deaths worldwide. The use of herbs as complementary medicine for cancer, especially advanced cancer, has recently increased. The aim of this study was to evaluate in vitro, the antiproliferative effect of Origanum vulgare against human breast adenocarcinoma (MCF-7), and human colon adenocarcinoma (HT-29). The essential oil (EO) was extracted from a bought amount of O. vulgare dried leaves and analyzed in a gas chromatograph interfaced with a mass selective detector. The cytotoxicity test was performed by sulforhodamine B assay. The results show that the EO is composed mostly of 4-terpineol and induces a high cytotoxicity effect in HT-29. In the MCF-7 cell line the EO was less effective. In conclusion, this study showed that O. vulgare main component is 4-terpineol and was effective in inducing cancer cell growth inhibition.

KEY WORDS:  antiproliferative assay  cancer cell lines  Origanum vulgare  plant extracts

toxic activity, such as the use of plant foods and their essential oils (EOs), which have a potential antioxidant effect.8 EOs are volatile, natural complex compounds characterized by a strong odor and are formed by aromatic plants as secondary metabolites.9 Origanum vulgare (oregano) is an annual, perennial, and shrubby herb native to the Mediterranean and has been used for many years as a medicinal plant with health-aiding properties such as its powerful antibacterial and antifungal properties.8 Oregano belongs to the Lamiaceae family and it is well-known that Lamiaceae spices have potent antioxidant properties, mostly due to the polyphenolic compounds.10,11 Phenolic phytochemicals are a large group of substances, which are found in significant quantities in vegetables, fruits, spices, and seeds, and are thought to promote optimal health partly through their scavenging effects in protecting cellular components against free radicals.7 Recent findings revealed the antimicrobial, fungicidal, insecticidal, and antioxidant potential of the EO and extract of Origanum, which raised great pharmaceutical and industrial interest in oregano.10 Natural antioxidants can protect the human body from free radicals and could retard the progress of many chronic diseases.11 Oxidation of lipids is associated with cell membrane damage, aging, heart disease, and cancer in living organisms.11 Studies have shown that components of oregano EOs, that is, carvacrol,

INTRODUCTION

A

ccording to the World Health Organization, cancer is a leading cause of death and is responsible for one in eight deaths worldwide.1 Cancer is a generic term for a large group of diseases that can affect any part of the body and has diverse risk factors and epidemiology. It can originate from most cell types and organs of the human body and is characterized by relatively unrestrained proliferation of cells that can invade beyond normal tissue boundaries and metastases to distant organs.2 The most frequent types of cancer are breast, prostate, lung, colorectal, stomach, and liver,3 and the numbers of deaths from cancer worldwide are projected to continue to rise to over 11 million in 2030.4 The use of herbs as complementary medicine for cancer, especially advanced cancer, has recently increased.5,6 Questions concerning the safety of synthetic agents have increased the interest in the use of natural compounds and have encouraged more detailed studies of plant resources, which are a rich source of bionutrients or bioactive phytochemicals.7 One new approach to cancer therapy focuses on anticancer and antimetastatic agents with little or no cytoManuscript received 2 March 2013. Revision accepted 18 June 2014. Address correspondence to: Rafael Guerra Lund, DDS, MD, PhD, Post-Graduate Program in Dentistry, Pelotas Dental School, Federal University of Pelotas (UFPel), Gonc¸alves Chaves St., 457/503, Pelotas 96015–560, RS, Brazil, E-mail: [email protected]

1129

1130

BEGNINI ET AL.

thymol and protocatechuic acid, possesses strong antioxidant properties and can act like potent anticancer and antimelanogenic compounds.12–14 Modulation of carcinogenic and mutagenic effects by inhibitors from plant origin has been of crucial importance for the final outcome of some biological effects, particularly for cancer.7 Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate in vitro the antiproliferative effect of O. vulgare against human breast adenocarcinoma (MCF-7) and human colon adenocarcinoma (HT-29). MATERIALS AND METHODS Material Samples of oregano (dried leaves from Chile) were purchased from TecPharma Importac¸a˜o de Produtos Quı´micos e Farmaceˆuticos (TECPHARMA), a major manufacturer of chemical and pharmaceutical products. These samples were manually crushed and stored under nitrogen atmosphere. The analytical standards thymol, a-terpinene, and a-terpinene were purchased from Fluka and the analytical standards a-terpineol, 4-terpineol, camphene, carvacrol, limonene, apinene, a-pinene, myrcene, p-cymene, 1,8-cineole, terpinolene, and linalool were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Solutions of each standard were prepared (1000 mg/L) using dichloromethane (Merck; pa grade, bidistilled) and stored under refrigeration. Extraction procedure The EO was extracted by hydrodistillation over a period of 4 h using a Clevenger apparatus and the yield of oil was recorded at every 5 min. The density of the EO measured by the gravimetric method was 0.92 g/mL at room temperature (20C). After hydrodistillation, water was removed by decantation and the EOs obtained were stored at 4C in a darkcolored container to prevent light-sensitive decomposition. Analytical methods The EO was analyzed in a gas chromatograph interfaced with a mass selective detector—GC/MS (Shimadzu 5050A), using a capillary column DB-5 (30 m · 0.25 mm · 0.25 mm) and a flow rate of 1 mL/min, in electronic impact mode of 70 eV and in split mode (split ratio 1:50). The following temperature gradient was used: 40C (0 min)—2C/min— 145C—10C/min—280C (10 min). The interface temperature was maintained at 280C. The identification of major compounds was accomplished by comparing their retention times with those of authentic standards, and by comparison of their mass spectra with those from the equipment library. Compositions were then expressed as percentages of normalized peak areas.

(Rio de Janeiro Cell Bank). The cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (Gibco), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco) and incubated at 37C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2, as described previously.15–17 Cytotoxicity assay According to the cells growth profile, cells were seeded with a density of 2 · 104 cell/well and incubated at 37C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. After 24 h, the cells were treated with the EO, which was diluted in dimethylsulfoxide to produce nine concentrations, ranging from 10 to 500 mg/mL. Of each concentration, 100 lL/well was added to the plates in triplicates. The final dilution used for treating the cells contained not more than 1% of the initial solvent, this concentration being used in the solvent control wells. This concentration of dimethylsulfoxide did not significantly influence the proliferation rate as compared to media alone. The plates were incubated for 72 h. At the end of the exposure time, cell growth was analyzed using the sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay. SRB assay After incubation for 72 h, adherent cell cultures were fixed in situ by adding 50 lL of cold 40% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid and incubated for 60 min at 4C. The supernatant was then discarded, and the plates were washed five times with deionized water and then dried. Of the SRB solution (0.4% w/v in 1% acetic acid), 50 lL was added to each well and incubated for 30 min at room temperature. Unbound SRB was removed by washing five times with 1% acetic acid. Then, the plates were air-dried and 100 lL of 10 mM Tris base pH 10.5 (Sigma) was added to each well to solubilize the dye. The plates were shaken gently for 20 min on a plate shaker, and the optical density was determined in an ELISA multiplate reader (Thermo Plate TP-Reader; Thermo Fisher Scientific) using a wavelength filter of 492 nm. The cell growth inhibition was calculated as the percentage inhibition of cell growth and was determined as follows: inhibitory rate = (1 – Abs492treated cells/Abs492control cells) · 100. All observations were validated by at least two independent experiments, and for each experiment, the analyses were performed in triplicate Statistical analyses Data sets from the SRB assay were analyzed using a two-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey test for multiple comparisons. Two factors were considered: the cell type and the concentration of the compound. Significance was considered at P < .05 in all analyses. The data are expressed as the mean – SEM. RESULTS

Cell lines The cell lines under investigation were human breast adenocarcinoma (MCF-7) and human colon adenocarcinoma (HT-29). They were purchased from RJCB Collection

EO composition The EO was obtained from O. vulgare and its composition is listed in Table 1. The table shows the retention

OREGANO’S COMPOSITION AND ANTIPROLIFERATIVE EFFECT Table 1. Chemical Composition of the Essential Oil of Origanum vulgare, Based on Retention Time and Concentration (%) Peak 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Compounds

Rt

Peak area

C (%)

a-thujene a-pinenea Sabinene b-pinenea Myrcenea a-phellandrene a-terpinenea p-cymenea Limonenea 1,8-cineolea Cis/trans b-ocimene a-terpinenea Terpinolenea Linaloola Trans-p-menthenol Borneol 4-terpineola a-terpineola Trans-piperitol Methyl thymol eter Methyl carvacrol Eter Geraniol/nerol Thymola Carvacrola Geranil/neril Acetate b-caryophyllene Spathulenol Caryophyllene

10.07 — 12.58 — 13.76 14.41 15.19 15.67 15.94 — 16.76 17.99 19.96 20.88 22.19 25.21 26.13 27.05 27.44 30.28 30.90 31.89 34.45 35.00 40.56 42.55 52.38 52.75

52 — 72 — 80 651 913 423 908 — 55 2.143 544 709 31 108 11.286 1.548 49 176 942 147 6.646 1.415 70 909 216 20

0.12 ND 0.18 ND 0.2 1.73 2.43 1.13 2.59 ND 0.13 5.91 1.63 2.07 0.10 0.36 41.17 4.98 0.17 0.58 3.04 0.51 21.95 4.71 0.21 3.22 0.81 0.07

a Compounds identified by comparison with standards compounds; other compounds identified by literature data and Willey Library. C, normalized peak areas without using the correction factors; ND, not detected (based in Rt of standards compounds); Rt, retention time.

indices calculated on the DB-5 column and the percentages of the detected compounds. Retention times of the sample components were calculated on the basis of homologous compounds under the same conditions, and the compounds were identified by injection of standards and/or by comparing the mass spectra with the equipment library.

FIG. 1.

1131

The average extraction yield of oregano EO was determined to be 1.33 – 0.16 wt%, achieved after about 60-min extraction; this value is similar to that found by Rodrigues et al.18 and Busatta et al.20 The chromatogram of O. vulgare EO (Fig. 1) shows that 4-terpineol (peak 20 and percent area of 41.17) is the major component, followed by thymol (peak 28, percent area of 21.95), c-terpinene (peak 12, percent area of 5.91), and carvacrol (peak 29, percent area of 4.71). Antiproliferative activity The cell growth inhibition of O. vulgare was determined by the cell proliferation assay using the MCF-7 and HT-29 cell lines. As shown in Figure 2, the EO was most effective in the HT-29 cell line when compared with MCF-7. In both cell types, the concentration of 10 mg/mL was not effective; in HT-29 cells, the percent of cell growth inhibition was 8.18% and in MCF-7 cells, this concentration induced cell proliferation. The most effective concentration for HT-29 and MCF-7 was 50 mg/mL: 60.8% and 48.9%, respectively; however, an increase in the EO concentration did not enhance the cell growth inhibition (Fig. 2). DISCUSSION O. vulgare L. is the most variable species of the genus Origanum, and variations in the composition of the EO have been the topic in the reports of several researchers.12,10 In the composition of the EO of oregano, great variations in the major and minor constituents were recorded. Several oregano species are characterized by the presence of two major components, thymol and carvacrol. Another intermediate type would contain a high content of two monoterpene hydrocarbons, c-terpinene or p-cymene, which are biogenetic precursors of thymol and carvacrol. However, some species were found with high values of linalool and others with monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes.12,18 The EO composition and yield of Origanum species vary with the origin of these plants and other factors, mainly the geographical and time of harvest.19

Chromatogram of oregano essential oil (EO) obtained by hydrodistillation. Peaks identification according to Table 1.

1132

BEGNINI ET AL.

FIG. 2. Cell growth inhibition of MCF-7 and HT-29 cell lines by Origanum vulgare EO. Uppercase letters indicate significant differences between tumor cell type and lowercase letters indicate significant differences in the concentration used. A P-value < .05 was considered significant (Tukey test).

Additionally, it is important to know the botanical origin of oregano as well as to do the investigation of the chemical constituents of this species. With regard to the taxonomic viewpoint, it is difficult to establish a correspondence between subspecies of O. vulgare and composition of its EO. In this study, 4-terpineol was the main component of Origanum EO, followed by thymol, c-terpinene, and carvacrol. This chemical profile is very similar to that found by Busatta et al.20 where 4-terpineol, c-terpinene, carvacrol, and thymol were the major components. Comparison of the data produced herein with previous reports showed that the chemotype variability has a straight relationship with the geographical region where the species is found.8,10,11 Reports2,21,22 have described that oregano grown in a Mediterranean climate contains higher amount of phenols, whereas oregano from the inland contains a higher amount of terpene alcohols. In a study of Russo et al.,23 the authors evaluated the chemical composition of the EO of 24 samples of O. vulgare, hirtum variety that grows in Southern Italy by GC/MS. A total of 56 compounds were identified, the major compounds were carvacrol (0.12–56.63%) and thymol

(7.91–53.62%). This same species, hirtum variety, grown in Northern Italy, was analyzed by Bocchini and coworkers24 and they found a group of oregano with high content of thymol, carvacrol, and linalool, other with a large variation among the sesquiterpenes, and a third group with loads of sesquiterpenes. Furthermore, the technique of obtaining the EO may influence the quality of the extract obtained and the amount of extracted aromatics. Parameters that affect the distribution coefficients of the main components present in the EO of O. vulgare, as the fraction of monoterpene hydrocarbons, depend on the equilibrium time, temperature, and density of the solvent used in the extraction process.19 Comparing the extraction process with those obtained from the supercritical CO2 extract indicated that the extraction method plays an important role in the final extract’s composition,18 especially with regard to the hydrocarbon terpene fraction. MCF-7 is an adenocarcinoma cell line recommended as one of the models for breast cancer tissue by the National Cancer Institute (NCI). The cell line expresses estrogen receptors and has been well studied and documented.22 In the present study, the Origanum EO was less effective in the MCF-7 cell type and was able to induce cytotoxicity in a concentration of 50 mg/mL (cell growth inhibition of 48.9%). The increase in the EO concentration did not enhance the cell growth inhibition. In the HT-29 cell line, the EO was significantly more effective (cell growth inhibition of 60.8%) and also presented the same characteristic of inducing cytotoxicity at 50 mg/mL and the nonenhancement of cell growth inhibition values with the increase of EO concentration. These results suggest that the EO could have a selective activity and therefore offer an opportunity to investigate its use as a therapeutic agent. The cytotoxic activity of oregano oil can be attributed to the action of its principal phenolic components, carvacrol, and thymol, which exhibit significant anticancer and antimutagenic activity when tested separately.7,13 Arunasree13 demonstrated the anticancer effects of carvacrol in MDA-MB 231, a human metastatic breast cancer cell line. These authors showed that carvacrol-treated cells exhibited prominent morphological changes like cell shrinkage with rounding of cells and formation of membrane blebs characteristic of apoptosis. Other studies have suggested that carvacrol might be potentially useful in counteracting free radical-mediated injuries and in DNA damage by the ability to enhance the levels of antioxidants along with its antilipid peroxidative activity,25,26 what can be a beneficial action of carvacrol against pathological alterations like melanogenesis and cancer. In conclusion, it was found that the O. vulgare EO main component is 4-terpineol and that the oil presents a significant effect on the cancer cell line tested, which could be associated with the major components of the extracted oil.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT This study was made possible by an undergraduate fellowship provided by the National Council of Scientific and Technology Development of Brazil (CNPq).

OREGANO’S COMPOSITION AND ANTIPROLIFERATIVE EFFECT

AUTHOR DISCLOSURE STATEMENT The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest concerning this article. REFERENCES 1. American Cancer Society: Global Cancer Facts & Figures 2nd Edition. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2011. www.cancer.org/ research/cancerfactsfigures/globalcancerfactsfigures/global-factsfigures-2nd-ed (accessed July 15, 2013). 2. Straton MR, Campbell PJ, Futreal A: The cancer genome. Nature 2009;458:719–724. 3. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM: GLOBOCAN 2008, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 10 (Online), 2010. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France. http://globocan.iarc.fr (accessed December 5, 2012). 4. World Health Organization: Mortality Database WHO Statistical Information System. 2011. www.who.int/whosis/mort/download/ en/index.html (accessed November 28, 2012). 5. Powell CB, Fung P, Jackson J, Dall’Era J, Lewkowicz D, Cohen I, Smith-McCune K: Aqueous extract of herba Scutellaria barbatae, a Chinese herb used for ovarian cancer, induces apoptosis of ovarian cancer cell lines. Gynecol Oncol 2003;91:332–340. 6. Nedel F, Begnini K, Carvalho PH, Lund RG, Beira FT, Del Pino FA: Antiproliferative activity of flower hexane extract obtained from mentha spicata associated with mentha rotundifolia against the MCF7, KB, and NIH/3T3 cell lines. J Med Food 2012;15:955–958. 7. Aydin S, Seker E: Effect of an aqueous distillate of Origanum onites L. on isolated rat fundus,duodenum and ileum: evidence for the role of oxygenated monoterpenes. J Pharm 2005;60:147–150. 8. Karakaya S, El SN, Karago¨zulu¨ N, Sahin S: Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of essential oils obtained from Oregano (Origanum vulgare ssp. hirtum) by using different extraction methods. J Med Food 2011;14:645–652. 9. Bakkali F, Averbeck S, Averbeck D, Idaomar M: Biological effects of essential oils—a review. Food Chem Toxicol 2008;46: 446–475. 10. Verma RS, Padalia RC, Chauhan A, Verma RK, Yudav AK, Singh HP: Chemical diversity in Indian ore´gano (Organum vulgare L.). Chem Biodivers 2010;7:2054–2064. 11. Hossain MB, Brunton NP, Barry-Ryan C, Martin-Diana AB, Wilkinson M: Characterization of phenolics composition in Lamiaceae spices by LC-ESI-MS/MS. J Agric Food Chem 2010;58: 10576–10581. 12. Al-Kalaldeh JZ, Abu-Dahab R, Afifi FU: Volatile oil composition and antiproliferative activity of Laurus nobilis, Origanum syriacum, Origanum vulgare, and Salvia triloba against human breast adenocarcinoma cells. Nutr Res 2010;30:271–278. 13. Arunasree KM: Anti-proliferative effects of carvacrol on a human metastatic breast cancer cell line, MDA-MB 231. Phytomedicine 2012;17:581–588.

1133

14. Chou TH, Ding HY, Hung WJ, Liang CH: Antioxidative characteristics and inhibition of alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone-stimulated melanogenesis of vanillin and vanillic acid from Origanum vulgare. Exp Dermatol 2010;19:742–750. 15. Henn S, Nedel F, de Carvalho RV, Lund RG, Cenci MS, PereiraCenci T, Demarco FF, Piva E: Characterization of an antimicrobial dental resin adhesive containing zinc methacrylate. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2011;22:1797–1802. 16. de Vasconcelos A, Campos VF, Nedel F, Seixas FK, Dellagostin OA, Smith KR, de Pereira CM, Stefanello FM, Collares T, Barschak AG: Cytotoxic and apoptotic effects of chalcone derivatives of 2-acetyl thiophene on human colon adenocarcinoma cells. Cell Biochem Funct 2013;31:289–297. 17. Nedel F, Campos VF, Alves D, McBride AJ, Dellagostin OA, Collares T, Savegnago L, Seixas FK: Substituted diaryl diselenides: cytotoxic and apoptotic effect in human colon adenocarcinoma cells. Life Sci 2012;91:345–352. 18. Rodrigues MR, Krause LC, Caramao EB, dos Santos JG, Dariva C, Vladimir de Oliveira J: Chemical composition and extraction yield of the extract of Origanum vulgare obtained from sub- and supercritical CO2. J Agric Food Chem 2004;52: 3042–3047. 19. Rodrigues MRA: Studies of Essential Oils Present in Marjoram and Oregano. 2002. [Ph.D. thesis in Chemistry, 148f.]. Chemistry Institute, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. 20. Busatta C, Mossi AJ, Rodrigues MRA, Cansian RL, De Oliveira JV: Evaluation of Origanum vulgare essential oil as antimicrobial agent in sausage. Braz J Microbiol 2007;38:610–616. 21. Hristova R, Ristc M, Brkic D, Stefkov G, Kulevanova S: Comparative analysis of essential oil composition of Origanum vulgare from Macedonia and commercially available Origani herba. Acta Pharm 1999;49:299–305. 22. Shoemaker RH: The NCI60 human tumour cell line anticancer drug screen. Nat Rev Cancer 2006;6:813–823. 23. Russo M, Galletti GC, Bocchini P, Carnacini A: Essential oil chemical composition of wild populations of Italian oregano spice (Origanum vulgare ssp. hirtum (link) ietswaart): a preliminary evaluation of their use in chemotaxonomy by cluster analysis. 1. Inflorescences. J Agric Food Chem 1998;46:3741– 3746. 24. D’Antuono LF, Galletti GC, Bocchini P: Variability of essential oil content and composition of Origanum vulgare L. populations from a North Mediterranean area (Liguria region, Northern Italy). Ann Bot 2000;86:471–478. 25. Yanishlieva NV, Marinova EM, Gordon MH, Reneva VG: Activity and mechanism of action of thymol and carvacrol in two lipid systems. Food Chem 1999;64:59–66. 26. Aristatile B, Al-Numair KS, Veeramani C: Protective effect of carvacrol on oxidative stress and cellular DNA damage induced by UVB irradiation in human peripheral lymphocytes. J Biochem Mol Toxicol 2010 [Epub ahead print]; DOI: 10.1002/jbt.20355.

Composition and antiproliferative effect of essential oil of Origanum vulgare against tumor cell lines.

Cancer is a leading cause of death and is responsible for one in eight deaths worldwide. The use of herbs as complementary medicine for cancer, especi...
180KB Sizes 3 Downloads 7 Views