David
Njus,
Vishram
ABSTRACT
ology the
Jalukar,
Ascorbic
but its reducing predominant
electron
donor
able neutral tively stable erful
donor
sufficient
to produce
ascorbate
rapidly
reduces
transfer
rather
than
This fast involving
electron
reduction of the cytochrorne anion but would circumvent mediates.
This
may
in the dianion
the
is an exceedingly
dianion
unfavor-
by outer-sphere
electron
the relais a pow-
acid
pH
corbate
observed. from
reaction concerted
rate
alone.
This
mechanism
ofascorbate
energetically
is in-
The
this
may be ratioproton-electron would
ofbiological
permit
monointer-
acid,
cytochrome
bS6l,
and
(Fig
volving
as an electron
metabolic
trons,
ascorbic
and
is oxidized
acid
reactions.
commonly
to the
free
Although
functions radical
donor
(reducing
it can
agent)
lose two
as a one-electron
semidehydroascorbate.
concerted
At
pH both ascorbate and semidehydroascorbate exist as monoanions (Fig I). Consequently, ascorbate oxidation involves the loss ofa proton (Hf) as well as an electron (e). There physiological
are three
mechanisms
by which
this
could
occur.
First, the ascorbate monoanion (AH) could lose an electron and the resultant free radical (AH . ) could then deprotonate to form the semidehydroascorbate anion (A). This mechanism may be ruled out because the midpoint reduction potential (E#{176}’ = +0.766 V) is prohibitively high (Table 1). Alternatively, the ascorbate monoanion may deprotonate to form the dianion (A =), which may then donate an electron to form the semidehydroascorbate anion. This outer-sphere mechanism
(Fig
2, A) accounts
for
reduction
by ascorbate
involving
compounds at neutral
or
of electron
biologically
pro-
suggests
that
transfer
between
pH.
We propose
significant
ascorbate-
using ascorbic acid as a reducing monoanion via a mechanism in-
deprotonation
ascorbate
donor
concerted
evidence
and electron
b56 I is a transrnembrane
intravesicular
levels
to cytochrome
(
transfer.
protein
found
in the
Its function is to reduce intraback to ascorbate to maintain 1 3- 15). The
extravesicular
dcc-
is probably cytosolic ascorbate. cytochrome b56 1 mediates transmembrane dccfrom cytosolic ascorbate to intravesicular semi-
Consequently,
transfer
b561
(Fig
3).
In
this
way,
it provides
reducing
ascorbate-consuming enzymes such and peptidyl-glycine a-amidat-
ing monooxygenase. Cytochrome
elec-
donor
the semidehydroas-
form
b56 1 at physiological
membranes ofsecretory vesicles. vesicular semidehydroascorbate
tron
acid functions vital
also
rate
to other
equivalents for intravesicular as dopamine /3-monooxygenase
Ascorbic in many
slowly
2, B). Kinetic
cytochrome
this also applies
dehydroascorbate Introduction
ascorbate
relatively
may
for the rapid
Cytochrome
proton-
pK2 is 11.34,
of total reduces
by a mechanism
requiring reactions: enzymes agent react with the ascorbate
ascorbic
because
fraction
ascorbate
transfer
directly
account
ascorbate
tron Ascorbic
Accordingly,
transfer
may
that
Moreover, small
monoanion
anion
adrenal
acid utilization: enzymes using ascorbic acid may react with the ascorbate monoanion via concerted proton-electron transfer. Am J C/in Nutr 199 1 ;54: 1 l79S-83S KEY WORDS electron transfer
ascorbate
ton-electron
med-
form.
pH (9, 12).
For example,
by the abundant ascorbate formation of unfavorable
be a general
pH
pH.
b56l
transfer
in bi-
at physiological
at neutral
cytochrome
chromaffin vesicles. by a mechanism
reductant
dianion forms radical anion and
rates
M Kelley
is a poor
its concentration
the reaction
1
monoanion)
to the
ascorbate
Patrick
At physiological
(the
it oxidizes
but
and
is an essential
of ascorbate
because
Zu,
is paradoxical.
free radical. The semidehydroascorbate
electron
ullary nalized
acid
power
form
Jian
between
b56 1 contains
a single
noncovalently
heme (17, but see reference 18 for a contrasting protein, cloned and sequenced (19), consists with
a molecular
weight
of 30 061.
The
view).
of273
primary
bound
The bovine amino acids structure
in-
that the cytochrome is a very hydrophobic protein with possibly six transmembrane regions and very little extramembranous protein. A relatively large fraction of aromatic amino dicates
acids
(16%)
ficiently
may
across
Furthermore,
clusters
the membrane ascorbate sequence
the
single long
heme distance
of cationic
may facilitate
amino
interaction
to transfer (across
electrons
ef-
the membrane).
acids on either ofthe cytochrome
side of with
and semidehydroascorbate. Cytochrome bS6l has little homology to other cytochromes, indicating that it may
represent perform
allow a relatively
a new class its unique
of cytochrome
independently
evolved
to
function.
of such
compounds
as ferricyanide and cytochrome c. The ascorbate dianion is a good electron donor since the midpoint reduction potential (E#{176} = +0.076 V) is quite favorable (Table 1). The rate of electron transfer via this pathway is highly pH dependent, however, because it reflects the pH dependence of the fraction Am J C/in Nuir
199l;54:l
1795-835.
Printed
in USA.
© 1991 American
I From the Department ofBiological Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit. 2 Address reprint requests to D Njus, Department of Biological Sci-
ences, Society
Wayne for Clinical
State
University,
Nutrition
Detroit,
MI 48202.
I 179S
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ajcn/article-abstract/54/6/1179S/4715079 by East Carolina University Health Sciences Library user on 10 January 2019
Concerted proton-electron transfer ascorbic acid and cytochrome
1 1 80S
NJUS H2COH
H,COH
H2COH
pK1
HCOH
pK2
HCOH
1,o...,_o
-H’
H2COH HCOH
HCOH
pK2
-
sS
E01{
I
41.c
Cyt c
E02
H2S:OH
H2SxIH
PKr
E02
HcOH
HH -H’
Cyt c red
+11’ HO
0
H2OH
AH’
HCOH
FIG 1 . Interconversion ofascorbate species. Protonation reactions are shown horizontally and electron transfer reactions are shown vertically.
Because
electron
transfer
b56 1 , its electron-transfer catalytic
functions.
model
For
and
have
investigating
been
pared
Results The
bovine
adrenal
of cytochrome
complicated
by other
cytochrome
ofelectron
enzymes. kinetics
b56 1 in resealed
from
the
the kinetics the
function
are not
reason
ascorbate-using
ofcytochrome
is a superb
transfer
With
that
in mind,
of electron-transfer
membrane
chromaffin
H2cOH HcOH
we
reactions
vesicles
medullary
B)
between
(ghosts)
Cyt b561
pre-
vesicles.
and discussion simplest
Cyt b561 red
kinetic
tron-transfer the
that
for investigating
ascorbate
is the only reactions
analysis
reaction
of the
studied
cytochrome
the kinetics
b56 1 and
both
Cyt0,, + AH Cyt
+ FeCy0
Cyt
+ A;ut Cytox
two
H
AHUt
the rate
to a rate
reactants.
of the
and
+ A, +
Cyt0
+ AHUt
Cyt
+
this
dccand
+ H out
+ H
to
approach,
reactions
external
FeCy
Cyt0
ofan
constant
Using
following
internal
Cyt out
+
+
that
is proportional
concentrations
we have
assumes
between
HCOH
substrates:
(Reaction
1)
(Reaction
2)
(Reaction
3)
(Reaction
4)
FIG 2. Mechanisms transfer.
Reduction
ofascorbate
ofcytochrome
concerted proton-electron b56 1) is indicated. TABLE 1 Thermodynamic
parameters
of ascorbic
Parameter E,,7(V)
(V)
+0.766
E#{176}t (V) pK1 pI(2
+0.076 4.04 11.34
pK,
-0.45
Eo
S
The
assigned
value
using the following Similar compilations
t The assigned Kr using
K2K1)/(l
Measured values
+0.330
the equation +
EH]/Kr)}.
Reference
transfer.
Reduction
electron
(B) Hypothesized
ofcytochrome
for defining
rate constants
reactions
at the inside
surface
1) to denote
reactions
0 (or -0)
to denote
bS6l
the subscript
and
subscript
outward
direction
in the inward direction. The (A for ascorbate-semidehydroascorbate
1 2
+0.340 +0.93 +0.85to+l.00
3 4 5
transfer reactant
4.04 11.34
6 6
the three experimental state electron transfer
b56 1 (Cyt
0.45
7
equation: E#{176}’ = E#{176} + (RI/F) have been given by others
E#{176}2, pK2
,
(ln 10) (pK2 (9-I 1).
value for E#{176}2 was calculated from E,,7 , K1 (8): E#{176} = E,,1 (RI/F) ln {( 1 + [W]/K2
vesicle
and pKr -
, K2 ,
and
indicates
a negative
is to use the subscript of cytochrome
electron subscript
at the outside transfer
indicates
superscript
in the electron
and
denotes the F for fern-
reactions
by using
ferrocyanide).
We have
from
-
A positive
+0.300
for E#{176}’ was calculated
1 (or
surface.
+0.330
-
-
c (Cyt c) is indicated.
acid
Our convention Assigned value
A (A) Outer-sphere
oxidation.
pK) and
+ [H]2/
ghosts
determine
the kinetics
rate
ferncyanide
as ferricyanide
nide concentration, tionality allows
ferricyanide
constants
to cytochnome
to external
of the above
in Figure 4. Steadywithin chromaffin-
schemes illustrated from ascorbate trapped
to external
the
ascorbate sured
studied
(Fig
for electron b56l
(k). reduction)
(ks’) The
and
rate
4, A) may transfer
from
be used
from
cytochrome
ofelectron
is proportional
at least at low concentrations. us to calculate the rate constant
transfer to the This k.
to
internal b561 (meaferricyaproporAt high
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ajcn/article-abstract/54/6/1179S/4715079 by East Carolina University Health Sciences Library user on 10 January 2019
AH2
ml
H2COH
A)
HCOH
a
HO
OH
AL
-H’
H)...( HO
ET
PROTON-ELECTRON
ferncyanide
concentrations
a maximum
rate that
concentration.
This
k’ . The
details
the
rate
of electron
is proportional allows
of this
us
method
transfer
reaches
to the internal
to
calculate
have
the
been
in secretory vesicles. 1, semidehydnoascorbate with permission from reference 16).
rate
constant
published
elsewhere
steady-state
determine
the
chrome
bS6l
addition medium
rate
experiment constant
to external
external
semidehydroascorbate.
electron
transfer
from
The external rate,
the
rate
and
constant
the
centration Finally,
state
spectrophotometrically
fin-vesicle
membranes
with
tion is proportional to the low ascorbate concentrations)
cyto-
In this case,
it can
internal
state
can then
cytochrome,
after ascorbate.
be inferred
ascorbate
of the the
from
Rate
constants
this
mixing initial
cyto-
stoppedb56l is
of chromafrate
of reduc-
ascorbate concentration (at least at and the slope is the rate constant
constants and
for the above
approaches,
are
for the
reactions
semidehydroascorbate
parent
that
electron relatively
they
reactions,
summarized
are too
determined
in Table
of cytochrome (ks’,
k,
k,
) are
transfer. Cytochrome c is reduced slow rate at physiological pH (12,
is highly
pH
dependent,
increasing
by using
2. When b56 1 with
fast to be compatible
the
with
rate
ascorbate
examined,
it is ap-
(ks’ and ofcytochrome
than
would
of
at a this 10 with
k1
not
reduction
Rates
nearly
as pH
reduction The
of cytochrome
of cytochrome
(Table
reduction
as would
2). Moreover,
by ascorbate
rate
b56 1 re-
dependent
by the dianion
b56l
c (midpoint
corbate L . moi
are much
constant
for reduction
potential
= +0.26
potential
However,
the
ascorbate
(+0.
rate
. 1
ofoxidation
is also
for
6.0 is 35 L
L#{149} mol
310
rate
14 V), should
constant
at pH
and
corbate
mol
.
the
at
be reduced
reduction .
‘
faster
than
b56 surface
surface b561
expected
when
(k1).
compared
a rate
potential mol
.
has a midpoint
of +0.42 .
reduction
be reduced more slowly. (k’) of 2 X 106 L . action
between
occurs
too
transfer. The
anomalous
transfer.
of
quickly
permits
ascorbate
b56 1 and
be
attributed
transfer
reduction
also
facilitate
outer-sphere
between
involving monoanion.
will
of 6.2 which
V (Table
1) should
be
concerted
the
rationalized
in
proton-electron
of cytochrome This
electron
ascorbate-semide-
b56 1 can
reaction
faster than a reaction requiring the ascorbate the rate will be much less pH dependent. electron
(kr)
semidehydnoascorbate to
of reaction
cytochrome
a mechanism
constant
of +0.076
the
Instead, we measured a rate constant . s’. Again, this suggests that the re-
rt
rates
with
(Table 2). a midpoint
Semidehydroascorbate,
potential
to
and
This
6.0.
cytochrome
hydroascorbate terms
V, with
at pH
1
1
by semidehydroas-
reduction L
slowly.
at the internal
external
ofcytochrome
more
by ferncyanide which has
l0
V) by as-
of cytochrome
rate of oxidation ofcytochrome b56l Cytochrome b56l reduces ferricyanide,
x
faster of cy-
at pH 6.0 has been measured as 2.5 (23) or 0.83 (12) ‘ . ‘ . Cytochrome b56l, which has a lower midpoint
reduction
(ks’)
) are
2, cytochnome
with
(12).
be expected.
tochrome
by
is consistent dianion
for reduction
rates
abundant
outer-sphere
by ascorbate 23). Moreover,
by a factor
duction
The con-
to
by using the of cytochrome The
con-
measured
(22). ascorbate
the
ascorbate
cytochrome.
be calculated and
to
of steady-state
(22).
these
rate
), the
may be monitored directly (Fig 4, C). The reduction
monitored
rate
directly,
redox
(k)
of the
the
of external semidehydroascorbate electron transfer from external
chrome bS6l flow method
k
(k
measured
from
(k).
to
oxidase to the suspension from internal ascorbate
be measured
rate constant
redox
ascorbate transfer
be used
transfer
Although
cannot
the internal
electron
semidehydroascorbate
of ascorbate and initiates electron
centration,
for
(Fig 4, B) may
This
c by the
be expected
(20, 21).
A similar
pH unit.
every
ascorbate
reductase;
b56 therefore
dianion. Concerted
oxidation
1 by may Moreover, proton-
of cytochrome
the be
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ajcn/article-abstract/54/6/1179S/4715079 by East Carolina University Health Sciences Library user on 10 January 2019
FIG 3. Mechanism ofascorbic acid regeneration b56l; 3, dopamine 5-monooxygenase (reprinted
1181S
TRANSFER
1 182S
NJUS
ET
AL TABLE 2 Sum mary of rate constants5 k4
pH
k
k’
35 55 9.4
±
12
±
12
3.6
±
(6.2 (6.7
±
(5.1
± 5.1)
SD. Values
S ;
±
2.7) x l0 3.4) X l0
for k’ and
s’
(2.0 (1.2 (1.7
l0
X
.
k were
x 106
0.7) 0.5) 0.2)
± ± ±
X
106
X
l0
determined
310 ± 10 450 ± 190 570 ± 190
using
the reaction
scheme shown in Figure 4, A (21). Values for k and k1 were determined using the reaction schemes shown in Figures 4, B and C, respectively (22).
b56 1 by semidehydroascorbate becomes
the
ascorbate
unfavorable We
ascorbate
have
chosen
to emphasize
the
because monoanion
semidehydroascorbate
instead
of the
energetically
dianion. the
term
distinct
concerted
roles
proton-electron
of H
and
e
and
transfer not
to convey
any mechanistic connotations. In terms ofmechanism, one could imagine two possibilities: first, when ascorbate passes an electron to the heme, the proton could be physically transferred to a
B
protonatable
AH#{149}
7t:t.
group
H
cytochrome.
Alternatively,
the
Ionic
dianion
form.
bonding
between
the
ascorbate
mono-
anion and a cationic group in the cytochrome could cause the pK for ascorbate bound to the cytochrome to be considerably lower than pK2 for free ascorbate. This would substantially indissociation complex
of the second proton and therefore facilitate
ofconcerted
ben of significant
from ascorbate electron transfer.
proton-electron
implications.
First,
because
duction electron
in many of these cases transfer. Second, concerted
account Because
for the unique biological properties outer-sphere oxidation ofascorbate
by the exceedingly
small
fraction
has a num-
ascorbate
functions
effective
unreactive
reductant. until
of ascorbic acid. is kinetically limited
in the dianion
Consequently,
it encounters
an enzyme
form,
ascorbate
proton-electron use ascorbate
ascorbic
acid
designed
unique combination, relative stability in the high reactivity in specific metabolic reactions, acid especially attractive as a reducing agent
AH
occur at transfer that re-
occurs via concerted protonproton-electron transfer may
is a fairly stable reductant. Because concerted transfer occurs quickly, specific enzymes can very
in
transfer
as a reducing agent in many biological reactions that neutral or slightly acidic pH and outer-sphere electron is inefficient under these conditions, it is quite likely
C
H
the
The concept +
the
not to the protein but to water. The protein’s site could induce ascorbate to deprotonate to
crease the the reaction A-
on
could be transferred ascorbate-binding
as a
is relatively to use it. This
environment and makes ascorbic in biological sys-
tems.
a
References lyanagi I, Yamazaki I, Anan KF. One-electron oxidation-reduction properties of ascorbic acid. Biochim Biophys Acts l985;806:25561. 2. Steenken 5, Nets P. Electron transfer rates and equilibria between 1.
FIG 4. Reactions
schemes
for rate-constant
measurements.
substituted phenoxide ions and phenoxyl radicals. i Phys Chem 1979;83:l 134-7. 3. Everling VFB, Weis W, Staudingen H. Determination ofthe standard reduction potential (pH 7.0) of L-(+)-asconbate/semidehydno-L(+)ascorbate by nonenzymatic reaction of L(+)-ascorbate/semidehydro-
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ajcn/article-abstract/54/6/1179S/4715079 by East Carolina University Health Sciences Library user on 10 January 2019
6.0 7.0 8.0
mo/’
.
L
AH
k1
PROTON-ELECTRON
4.
6.
7.
8.
9. 10. 1 1. 12. 13.
in biological membranes. Reading, MA: 1981:365-74. J, Cook C, Kelley PM. Electron transfer across the chromaffin granule membrane. i Biol Chem l983;258:27-30. 15. Njus D, Kelley PM, Hannadek Gi. Bioenergetics ofsecnetory vesicles. Biochim Biophys Acts l986;853:237-65. 16. Njus D, Ozkan ED, Kelley PM. Bioenergetics and the adrenal medulla. In: Dulbecco R, ed. Encyclopedia of human biology. Vol 1. San Diego: Academic Press, 1991:641-53. 17. Apps DK, Boisclair MD, Gavine ES, Pettignew GW. Unusual redox behaviour of cytochnome b-56 1 from bovine chnomaffin granule membranes. Biochim Biophys Acts l984;764:8-l6. 18. Degli Eposti M, Kamensky YA, Arutjunjan AM, Konstantinov AA. A model for the molecular organization of cytochrome b-56l in chromaffin granule membranes. FEBS Lett l989;254:74-8. 19. Perin MS, Fried VA, Slaughter CA, SUdhof IC. The structure of cytochnome b561 , a secretory vesicle-specific electron transfer proosmotic
proton
circuits
Addison-Wesley, 14. Njus D, Knoth
tein.
20.
EMBO i 1988;7:2697-703.
Kelley PM, Njus D. A kinetic analysis of electron transport acnoss chromaffin vesicle membranes. i Biol Chem l988;263:3799-804. 21. Jalukan V, Kelley PM, Njus D. Reaction of ascorbic acid with cytochnome b56l: concerted electron and proton transfer. i Biol Chem 199 1;266:6878-82. 22. Kelley PM, ialukar V, Njus D. Rate of electron transfer between cytochnome b56 1 and extravesiculan ascorbic acid. J Biol Chem 1990;265: 19409-13. 23. Yamazaki I. The reduction of cytochnome c by enzyme-generated ascorbic free radical. J Biol Chem l962;237:224-9.
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ajcn/article-abstract/54/6/1179S/4715079 by East Carolina University Health Sciences Library user on 10 January 2019
5.
L(+)-asconbate with cytochnome b5(Fe2/cytochnome b5(Fe3). Hoppe Seylers Z Physiol Chem l969;350:886-8. Pelizzetti E, Mentasti E, Pramauro E. Kinetics and mechanism of the oxidation ofascorbic acid by Tris(l,lO-phenanthroline)inon (III) and its derivatives in aqueous acidic perchlorate media. Inorg Chem 1976; 15:2898-900. Pelizzetti E, Mentasti E, Pramauro E. Outer-sphere oxidation of ascorbic acid. Inong Chem 1978;l7:l 18 1-6. Iaqui Khan MM, Martell AE. Kinetics of metal ion and metal chelate catalyzed oxidation ofascorbic acid. IV. Uranyl ion catalyzed oxidation. i Am Chem Soc l969;9 1:4668-72. LaroffGP, Fessenden RW, Schuler RH. The electron spin resonance spectra of radical intermediates in the oxidation of ascorbic acid and related substances. i Am Chem Soc l972;94:9062-73. Ilan YA, Czapski G, Meisel D. The one-electron transfer redox potentials of free radicals. I. The oxygen-superoxide system. Biochim Biophys Acts l976;430:209-24. Williams NH, Yandell JK. Outer-sphere electron-transfer reactions ofascorbate anions. Aust J Chem 1982;35:l 133-44. Creutz C. The complexities ofasconbate as a reducing agent. Inong Chem 198 l;20:4449-52. Njus D, Kelley PM. Vitamins C and E donate single hydrogen atoms in vivo. FEBS Lett l99l;284:l47-51. Al-Ayash Al, Wilson MI. The mechanism of reduction of singlesite nedox proteins by ascorbic acid. Biochem J 1979;l77:64l-8. Njus D, Zallakian M, Knoth i. The chnomaffin granule: protoncycling in the slow lane. In: Skulachev VP, Hinkle PC, eds. Chemi-
ll83S
TRANSFER