Letters

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: The authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Dr Buerhaus reported receiving payment for lectures from a variety of organizations, associations, universities, and groups; and being appointed chair of the National Health Care Workforce, which was established under the Affordable Care Act, but has not begun any work yet. No other disclosures were reported. Funding/Support: This study was in part supported by a grant from Sigma Theta Tau, Delta Mu Chapter. Role of the Funder/Sponsor: Sigma Theta Tau had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Additional Information: We dedicate this study to Donna Diers, PhD (Yale School of Nursing), who died during the early stages of this research. 1. National Equality Pay Task Force. Fifty years after the Equal Pay Act of 1963. http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/image/image_file/equal_pay -task_force_progress_report_june_10_2013.pdf. Accessed March 3, 2014. 2. Jagsi R, Griffith KA, Stewart A, Sambuco D, DeCastro R, Ubel PA. Gender differences in the salaries of physician researchers. JAMA. 2012;307(22):24102417. 3. Lo Sasso AT, Richards MR, Chou C-F, Gerber SE. The $16,819 pay gap for newly trained physicians: the unexplained trend of men earning more than women. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011;30(2):193-201. 4. Kalist DE. The gender earnings gap in the RN labor market. Nurs Econ. 2002; 20(4):155-162. 5. Jones CB, Gates M. Gender-based wage differentials in a predominantly female profession: observations from nursing. Econ Educ Rev. 2004;23(6):615631. 6. Seabury SA, Chandra A, Jena AB. Trends in the earnings of male and female health care professionals in the United States, 1987 to 2010. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(18):1748-1750.

However, the basis for aggressive therapy in the patients who screened positive was not clearly explained. The enrollment of participants in FACTOR-64 began on July 9, 2007, and ended May 16, 2013, and all patients were followed up until August 1, 2014. The prespecified targets of the aggressive strategy were not consistent with the literature and the standard guidelines available at the beginning of enrollment. These objectives were more intensive than those recommended for patients with diabetes and CAD by both the American Heart Association and the American Diabetes Association. It is noteworthy that the intensive glucose control (HbA1c level

Coronary artery disease screening using coronary computed tomography angiography.

Coronary artery disease screening using coronary computed tomography angiography. - PDF Download Free
65KB Sizes 0 Downloads 15 Views