was exceedingly instructive. The chair occupied by Lord Lister, and the discussion
lation was
opened by M. Haffkine who detailed in a clear and very able discourse his methods and results in inoculating against cholera and plague in India.
He
displayed enthusiasm combined with knowledge and modesty; and while justly pleased with the success of his labours, he was not disposed to overrate them, either as regards their finality or predominance in a scheme of preventive enterprise. He assigned to sanitation the primary place in such a scheme and arrogated for inoculations a secondary place as a means of minimising suffering and mortality in an infected locality or community, drawing a parallel between the case of the stricken town or village and the stricken individual. In both instances preventive action had failed and curative measures were the only resource. He drew a very important contrast between diseases due scientific
and facultative parasites, and the the extrasomatic or saprowhich opportunities of the latter life gave for compassing ph}rtic to
obligatory
their destruction or modifying their noxiousness. While much still remains to bo done to determine the value of these and
praise
are
inoculations, great
undoubtedly
for his arduous and useful labours which have contributed
credit
due to M. Haffkine in
India,
to throw
materially light on obscure questions, and have resulted in the saving of many lives. The report of the Plague Commission will, information