1270
Drug-Resistant
Staphylococcus aureus Contamination in the Ward Environment
Yoshinori TANAKA,Akiko ADACHIand Atsushi ASHIMOTO Department ofBacteriology, FacultyofMedicine, TottoriUniversity Hideaki KISHIMOTO, Ryota TESHIMA and Kichizo YAMAMOTO Department ofOrthopedic Surgery,FacultyofMedicine, TottoriUniversity (Received: May24,1992) (Accepted: June28,1992) Key words:
Staphylococcus tamination,
aureus,
methicillin-resistance
coagulase-negative
, environmental
con-
Staphylococcus
Abstract A total April of
of 282
1991
strains
to January
S. epidermidis
and
(30%),
thirty-six
methicillin,
the
this
routine
of S.
aureus
(23%)
(48%)
DMPPC-resistant
testing
of
strains with
of
S.
Hospital . The
strains 65
of
of
were
anterior
environment
isolates
(20%)
nares
of the
from 84
One
were
strains hundred
methicillin
drug-resistant
erythromycin, than two
less
were
(21%).
S . aureus
multiple
, tetracycline, resistant to
of the
ward
main
S. haemolyticus
strains
aureus
were
testing
University performed
58
13
cephametazole
, along
transmission
from were
, and
and
strains
cephaloridine,
DMPPC-susceptible
nosocomial
isolated tests
staphylococci
ampicillin.
while that
to prevent
all
were
drug-susceptibility
strains
of The
antibiotics;
indicate
and
65
strains
(DMPPC)-resistant. seven
of Staphylococcus 1992
to
three
gentamicin, drugs
medical
. These
staff,
to and
results
is necessary
. Introduction
In
the
peared
in
with
1970s,
methicillin
hospitals
and
this
DMPPC-resistant In
and
April
1991,
resistant
increasingly
been
S. aureus
postsurgery
and
ward
of
bacteria
Staphylococcus,
, coagulase-positive
has
a new
environmental
(DMPPC)-resistant
to
in
the
the
Tottori
monitor
recognized in
Bacteria
were and
kept collected. on The
glass
to be tested open
for
the
was We
floor
plates
also
of
the
were
gram-staining.
Seiyaku
and Co.,
別 刷 請 求先:(〒683)米
the
Ltd.,
from
corner
bacteria These
incubated
Staphylococcus
of nosocomial
hosts
is
was
opened
contamination
well
infection
recognized1 , and
we
, especially
ap-
. Infection
,2,3). collected
that
due
air-borne to
DMPPC-
ward.
collected ward.
Hospital
Staphylococcus
collected at
for
Several
oxidation-fermentation (Nissui
were
placed
and -negative a cause
compromised
University
Materials
cover
as
and the
of
swabs 24 hr
colonies
University
the
from
put
at 37°C were
Hospital
corridor
sterilized
were
Methods
in swabs
straight
tested
were and
catalase
tests.
Species
of Staphylococcus
Tokyo),
with
which
staphylococci
ward
ward that
on
. Bacteria thus
the
for were
to the then
hour
rubbed
nutrient
were be
agar and
on
identified separated
were
with
of objects
田中
,
.
the
colony
further
to a slide selected
by
test•ESP
-18
with
the
ID
into
21
species
and
子市 西 町86
鳥取 大 学 医学 部 細 菌 学教 室
the
bacteria
surfaces
plate
from cocci
plate
air-borne
the
agar
transferred
gram-positive
can
. A nutrient one
吉紀
感染症学雑誌
第66巻 第9号
2
Drug-resistant subspecies.
Staphylococcus
Staphylococcus
aureus
Antibiotic
zone
identified
(DMPPC)
disk,
susceptibility sizes
for
14mm;
pg
resistant,
18mm;
to gentamicin
(GM,
These October
testing
was
to
of•…23 for
48
to
30
resistant,
susceptible
to
19
species
and
by
at
disk
30•Ž
.
resistance
or
for
24
For
and
hr
subspecies4)
. The
.
methods5)
indicate
4
at
testing zone
37•Ž
with
the
diameters
. Antibiotic
30
of disk
pg
24mm
breakpoint
were:
susceptible
16mm;
into
1271
to be coagulase-positive
mm
hr
in the Ward
classified
performed
diameters
(CER,
be
confirmed
susceptibility
15mm;
disk),
finally
incubation
and
to cephaloridine 30
recognized
was
zone
after
resistance
resistant,
susceptible (CMZ,
now
susceptibility
methicillin indicate
is
Staphylococcus
pg
ampicillin
disk),
(AMPC
14mm;
17
mm;
erythromycin
, 30 jug
resistant
susceptible (EM,
,•†15mm; to
50 pg
disk),•…15mm; susceptible
tetracycline
disk),
resistant,
(TC,
15 mm;
mm;
to cephametazole
200
resistant
16
pg
disk),
17mm;
,•†16
mm;susceptible
, July
(3 months),
30 ,ug disk).
isolations
were
(6 months),
performed
1991,
and
in April
in January
(one
week
(9 months),
after
opening
the
new
ward)
species
were
and
1992.
Results In stains
total, were
January,
282
1992.
haemolyticus,
would
rate
only
increased that
mucous
membrane,
The
52%
isolation 2),
although
1991,
shows
number
of
56%
S.
S. aureus
epidermidis
were rate
for
of
isolated 1991,
and 102
species
14
strains
isolated;
strains
isolated
in July, were
if DMPPC-resistant of
were in July,
DMPPC-resistant
factors and
identified
in October
many
, 1991
strains
of
. Fifty-two
and S.
64 strains
in
epidermidis,
S.
88%
of
is 43%
shown
in
DMPPC-resistant, were S.
in
October the
transferred
haemolyticus,
Table 38%
rate
of
through the
2.
and
percent were
genus
flora
of
S . aureus
Staphylococcus the
of
DMPPC-
DMPPC-resistant
the
normal
Sixty-two
in January
human
. It is skin
and
DMPPC-resistant. S. aureus
relatively
in
few
Table
平 成4年9月20日
strains
found.
April, 20%
species 64
the
were for
in
Although be
Staphylococcus
S. aureus
isolated
notable
(Table
1
isolation
Staphylococcus resistant.
of
in April,
Table and
The
stains
separated
the
total
DMPPC-resistant
1
Isolation
isolates
for
each
strains
of Staphylococcus
term are
from
increased
being
isolated
the ward
gradually, at
present.
except
in April Coagulase-
1272
Yoshinori Table
2
Isolation
TANAKA
et al
of methicillin-resistant
strains
a) Number of methicillin-resistant strains/total number of strains b) CNS -1 is considered to be pathogenic for man ; this group contains S . epidermidis, S. capitis, S. saprophyticus, and S. xylosus.c ) CNS-2 is considered to be non -pathogenic for man ; this group contains S . warneri, S. haemolyticus, S. hominis, S. auricularis , S. cohnii, S. simulans, S. sciuri, S. caprae, S. equorum, and S. kloosi.
Table
3
Antibiotic
susceptibility
of 282 isolates
a) No . of strains tested was 52, 64, 102, and 64 in April (at the first week) , July (the third month), October, 1991 (the sixth month), and in January , 1992 (the 9th month), respectively.
negative Staphylococcus (CNS) species, such as S. epidermidis and S . xylosis, , S. captitis, S. saprophyticus, which are pathogenic for man (CNS-1), decreased in July, but there was a tendency to increase. The isolation
rate for DMPPC-resistant
strains
in all isolates in April was 37%, but that in the other terms was species of Staphylococcus(CNS-2), such as S. warneri
relatively low (all were 14%). Non-pathogenic haemolyticus,
S. hominis , S. auricularis,
, S.
S. cohnii,
S. simulans, S. sciuri, S. caprae, S. equorum and S. kloosi were isolated at the highest rate in July , and the isolation rate for DMPPC-resistant strains of CNS-2 was high (41%) in July. In total, ten strains of S . sciuri, S. caprae, S. equorum and S. kloosi, which are usually
found in soil, were isolated in July. It is considered that the ward was contaminated
as that time. of DMPPC-resistant and susceptible Staphylococcus against six other antibiotics, ABPC, CER, CMZ, TC, EM, and GM , was investigated (Fig. 1 and Table 3). Although most of the DMPPC-susceptible strains were also susceptible to other antibiotics or resistant to only one or two drugs , DMPPC-resistant strains were resistant to three to six antibiotics. There were two strains which showed The cross-resistance
resistance
to all the seven drugs.
The numbers of DMPPC-susceptible and - resistant strains of S. aureus , in Fig . 1. The DMPPC-resistant strains of S. aureus had a high frequency of cross-resistance to other drugs and the DMPPC-susceptible strains also had cross-resistance to other drugs. The DMPPC-resistant strains of CNS-1 had multiple drug resistance , on an average to four drugs, and the DMPPC-susceptible strains of CNS-1 were resistant to 0 to 3 drugs. It is notable that 88% of S . CNS-1 and CNS-2 are shown
感 染 症 学雑 誌
第66巻
第9号
Drug-resistant
Staphylococcus
1273
in the Ward
Fig. 1 Multiple drug resistance of S. aureus and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (a) Cross-resistance of MRSA (upper) and MSSA (lower) to ABPC, CER. CMZ, TC, EM, and GM. (b) Cross-resistance of DMPPC-resistant (upper) and —susceptible (lower) CNS-1 to seven drugs. The CNS-1group contains S. epidermidis, S. capitis, and S. saprophyticus.(c) Cross-resistance of DMPPC-resistant (upper) and —susceptible (lower) CNS-2 to seven drugs. The CNS-2group contains S. warneri, S. haemolyticus, S. hominis, S. auricularis, S. cohnii, S. simulans, S. sciuri, S. caprae, S. equorum, and S. kloosi. (a)
(c)
(b)
haemolyticus, which constituted 50%of CNS-2, were resistant to DMPPC, and that the DMPPC-resistant strains of S. haemolyticus were resistant to 5 drugs on the average. The antibiotics susceptibility of 282 strains to 7 drugs is shown in Table 3. More than half of the isolates were resistant to ABPC in each term, and the average rate of resistance to ABPC was 57%.The average rate of resistance to DMPPC and EM was 48% and 38%,respectively. In contrast, the rates of resistance to TC (14%)and CER (18%)were relatively low. Discussion Staphylococcus Test• SP• 18 identify are
certified
Many the
in
37.8%
in
1980
in
were
tested
total
S.
which (MIC
S.
air
Manual
in
1989, in
a surgical
for
aureus
ward
and the from
methicillin-resistance. isolates,
and
classified
of
but
can
Systematic
that
these
1983 The
highly
species 21
identify
and
S. arlettae,
another
to
1988, frequency
methicilin-resistant
the
4 subspecies4). and
2
The
Nissui
subspecies.
S. equorum
62
and
also
strains
of isolation aureus
the
ID
It
cannot
S. kloosi,
which
medical
staff,
isolated of S.
patient, frequency
Hospital
were
airborne
from
that
University
214
S.
isolated
reported
strains study,
and
(MRSA)
Nakasone6) in
epidemic
In
and species
Bacteriology4).
specimens
wards.
19 into
S. aureus
Kusano clinical
into
Staphylococcus
DMPPC-resistant
from
samples
being
genus
caseolyticus,
described
isolated
to 63.2%
from
specimens
the
environment6,7,8'9'10,11,12).
S. aureus
and
and
have
as
separate
in Bergey's
studies hospital
MRSA
staff
recognized
can
S. saccharolyticus
not
and
is now
system
increased from
aureus,
the
isolated
in
of MRSA
(>12.5
pg/ml)
(H-MRSA;
of
steadily, noses
isolated
strains
strains
of isolation
the
from
of medical from
clinical
operating was
MIC
room,
55%-80%
in
>100ƒÊg/ml),
by 1987, accounting for about 60% of MRSA were not detected in 1983, had increased in frequency staff has been reported by several authors 8,9,10). The isolation of S. aureus from medical z12.5 ƒÊg/ml)7).
平成4年9月20日
1274
Yoshinori
TANAKA
et al
Another study has shown that mattresses and other environmental objects played an important part in MRSA infection11). Our results showed that the frequency of isolation of DMPPC-resistant staphylococci and MRSA in the total isolates of 282 strains was 48% and 20%, respectively. The frequency of isolation of MRSA was far lower than that reported by Takesue et al7). However, preventive measures against nosocomial infection should be taken as soon as possible , since consideration of these reports indicates that the frequency of isolation of MRSA will increase . The Staphylococcus antibiogram showed that multiple drug-resistance was observed against many antibiotics and that DMPPC-resistant Staphylococcus cross-resistance was more frequent than that of DMPPC-sensitive Staphylococcus . According to the reports of Dandalides et al.13)and Hamilton-Miller and Iliffe14), although community-acquired isolates are frequently susceptible to a wide variety of agents , strains isolated from hospitalized patients have been noted to be resistant to an increasing number of antibiotics. In a review of a large number of studies, including that of Archer et al .15>and others16), it was suggested that CNS, particularly S. epidermidis , may be a reservoir for antibiotic-resistant genes in the hospital environment. Furthermore, Chambers17> demonstrated that methicillin-resistance in CNS and therapeutic failure with beta-lactam antibiotics in vivo were associated with the production of an altered pencillin binding protein (PBP), identical to PBP 2a (PBP2') found in MRSA . With this in mind, it can be seen that periodic trials should be carried out to isolate DMPPC-resistant staphylococci from the hospital environment and from the anterior nares of medical staff , since once MRSA has become endemic, extraordinary efforts may be required to halt nosocomial transmission . References
1) Karchmer, A.W., Archer, G.L. & Dismukes, W .E.: Staphylococcus epidermidis causing prosthetic valve endocarditis: microbiologic and clinical observation as guides to therapy . Ann. Intern. Med. 98: 447-455, 1983. 2) Sorrell, T.C., Packham, D.R., Shanker , S., Foldes, M. and Munroe, R.: Vancomycin therapy for methicillin-resistant Stahylococcus aureus. Ann. Intern . Med. 97: 344-350, 1982. 3) Watanakunakorn, C.: Treatment of infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aures . Ann. Intern. Med. 97: 376-378, 1982.
4) Schleifer, K.H. & Kloos, W. E.: Staphylococcus. Mair, N.S., Sharpe, M. E. and Holt, J.G. ed.) p.
In Bergey's
Manual
of Systematic
Bacteriology. (Sneath, P. H.A.,
1013-1035, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, 1986. 5) Barry, A. L. & Thornsberry, C.: Susceptibility tests: Diffusion test procedures. In Manual of Clinical Microbiology . (Balows, A., Hausler, W. J. Jr., Herrmann, K.L., Isenberg, H. D. and Shadomy, HJ. ed.) p.1117-1125, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C., 1991 . 6) Kusano, N. & Nakasone, I.: Nosocomial infection with methicilline-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Japn. J. Clin. Pathol. (Rinsho Byori) 38: 990-997, 1990. (in Japanese with English abstract)
7) Takesue, Y., Yokoyama, Tsumura, operating
T., Kodama, T., Fujimoto, M., Okita , M., Sewake, H., Murakami,
H.: Methicillin-resistant room.
Staphylococcus
aureus
Hiroshima J. Med. Sci. 38: 183-186,1989
in nosocomial
infections
in the
Y., Imamura, surgical
Y. &
ward
and
.
8) Ashiq, B.: The carrier state: methicillin-resistant Staphylococcusaureus . A hospital study "screening of hospital personel" for nasal carriage of Staphylococcusaureus. J. Pak. Med. Assoc 39: 35-38 . 1989.
9) Cookson, B., Peters, B., Webster, M., Phillips, I., Rahman , M. & Noble, W.: Staff carriage of epidemic methicillineresistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 27: 1471-1476, 1989. 10) Aoki, Y. & Kashiwagi, H.: Significance of nasal carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) by medical staff in nosocomial infection. J. Japn. Assoc. Infect. Dis. 64: 549-556, 1990. (in Japanese with English abstract) 11) Ndawula, E.M. & Brown , L.: Mattresses as reservoirs epidemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus . Lancet33 7: 488, 1991. 12) Yomoda, S., Takahashi, A., Tsunoda, S., Kobayashi , I., Ohkubo, T. & Inoue, M.: Isolation of methicillin-resistant
Staphylococcusaureus (MRSA)at Gunma University
Hospital.
Chemotherapy
39: 813-821,1991.
English abstract) 感 染 症 学 雑誌
(in Japanese with 第66巻
第9号
Drug-resistant
Staphylococcus
in the Ward
1275
13) Dandalides, P.C., Rutala, W.A., Thomann , C.A. & Sarubbi, F.A.: Serious postoperative infections caused by coagulase-negative
staphylococci:
an epidemiological and clinical study. J. Hosp. Infect. 8: 233-241,
14) Hamilton-Miller,J.M.T. & Iliffe, A.: Antimicrobial 19:217-226,
resistance
in coagulase-negative
1986. staphylococci. J. Med. Microbiol.
1985.
15) Archer, G.L., Dietrick, D.R. & Johnson, J.L.: Molecular epidemiology of trans missible gentamicin resistance coagulase-negative staphylococci in a cardiac surgery unit. J. Infect. Dis. 151: 243-251, 1985. 16) Pfaller, M.A. & Herwaldt, L.A.: Laboratory , clinical, and epidemiological aspectes of coagulase-negative lococci. Clin. Microbiol.
Rev. 1: 281-299,
among staphy-
1988 .
17) Chambers, H.F.: Coagulase-negative staphylococci resistant to /3-lactam antibiotics binding protein 2a. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 31: 1919-1924 , 1987.
病 棟 に お け るStaphylococcus
aureusの
in vivo produce penicillin-
汚染
鳥取大学医学部細菌学教室 田中
吉 紀,足 立
昭 子,足
本
敦
鳥取大学医学部整形外科学教室 岸本
要 1991年4月
英 彰,豊
受 付)
(平成4年6月28日
受理)
汚染 状 況 の
推 移 を 調 べ た.1991年4月,7月,10月,1992年
し,計282株 S.epidermidis (23%),
84株(30%),
Skaemo砂ticus58株(21%)で
メ チ シ リ ン(DMPPC)耐
平成4年9月20日
得 た.主 S.
ら れ た.ま GMに て3剤
廊 下 お よ び 病 室 の 床 か ら菌 を 採 集 のStaphylococcusを
吉蔵
株(48%),65株
に 開 設 され た 鳥 取 大 学 医学 部 附 属 病
の4回
良 太,山 本
(平成4年4月24日
旨
院 新 病 棟 に お け るStaphylococcUSの
の1月
島
な菌 種 は
aureus65株 あ っ た.
性 株 は 全 菌 株282株
中136
DMPPC感
のSaum鋸 た,ABPC,
中13株(20%)に CER,
CMZ,
対 す る 感 受 性 を 調 べ る と,DMPPCを か ら7剤
Staphylococcusの
EM, 含 め
に 耐 性 で あ っ た の に 対 し て,
受 性 株 は 高 々2剤
す ぎ な か っ た.こ
TC,
み
に 耐 性 で あ った に
れ ら の こ と か ら環 境 中 か らの 検 索 は,医
療 ス タ ッ フの 鼻 前 庭
か ら の 検 索 と と も にStaphylococcusに 感 染 の 防 止 に 有 益 で あ る と 考 え ら れ る.
よ る院 内