BIOLOGY

OF

46,

REPRODUCTION

Effects

392-400

(1992)

of Prostanoids

on the

Rat’s

Myometrium

D. J. CRANKSHAW Department

of Obstetrics

and

and Gynecology, Hamilton, Ontario,

In Vitro

during

Pregnancy1

V. GASPAR

Health Sciences Canada L8N

Centre, 3Z5

McMaster

Universiiy

ABSTRACT The

objectives

metrium

PG

of this

vitro

in

(prostaglandin)F,,,

Days

10,

circular

were

study

to a number

the

PGD,,

15,

18, 20,

strips

were

21,

10;

thereafter

potency

than

at Day

10. In contrast,

fell

PGF2,,

Responses value

on Day

for PGE2

were

no changes

there

to PGE2

and

during

PGF,,,

pregnancy

sthps

18 and

then

and

a high

gradually

in potency

the period

response

studied

were

U-46619 but

until

maximal

to

investigated

on

it

(longitudinal

the

that

hypotheses

these

prostanoids

act at different

lower

still

was

or a slight

muscle)

Both ioprost and U-46619 maintained a low potency throughout is probably not a target for PGI2 or TxA2 and that the different support

and

on Day

response

22, when

Day

myo-

longitudinal

between

low

of study

of the Responses

separately.

differences

potency

increased

over

contractile

were

A2-mimetic

prostanoid-dependent, with

on the

rat

(Tx)

thromboxane

patterns,

similar

to a minimum

increase between Days 15 and 21 (circular muscle). We conclude that the pregnant rat’s myometrium responses

were

in the oriented

circularly

the

and

produced

PGD,

of pregnancy and

iloprost,

PGI2-miznetic

and

effects

the

Longitudinally

22 of pregnancy.

and

small.

to determine

of prostanoids.

pregnancy.

patterns

of

sites within

the

myometrium.

INTRODUCTION Prostanoids rition muscle

are

thought

to play

[11, in part through their direct of the uterus [2,31. Several

a major

role

in partu-

effects on the smooth observations have led

analogs and

effectively

induce

labor

the horse [8] but not The role that prostanoids

close

to term

in vitro

suggest

that

in the

it

becomes

unclear. Some on longitudinal more

[7]

membrane an increase on

depolarization. in sensitivity

longitudinal

pared

to Day

muscle 19 pregnant

Accepted

October

18,

Received

August

1, 1991.

needed discharges

to

produce without

rats,

Day

22

although

pregnant the

rats maximum

however,

circular

on Day [10] was

21 than unable

of PGEI, PGE2, were successful.

or aspirin-treated

these agents produced some metrium through mechanisms prostanoid synthesis. There are no reliable data prostanoids

an inmarked

comef-

the maximum muscle from muscle

reDay was

on Day 17. to induce par-

or PGF28,, Furthermore,

although intra-

by prostanoid infusions than they were on Day that the characteristic be brought about by a

interaction between a number of prostanoids. they interpreted the failure of PGF28, to restore electrical activity to muscle strips isolated from in-

domethacin-

as term

Reiner and Marshall [12] found to the mechanical effects of PGF2,,, from

rats;

more sensitive intact rat, Fuchs with infusions of oxytocin

complex However, normal

approaches. Thus Kuriyama and Suzuki [11] investigated electrical but not mechanical responses to PGE2 and found that between Day 15 and parturition there was a marked decrease in the concentration crease in the frequency of burst

21 pregnant

50% of longitudinal

uterine pressure changes induced were less on Day 22 of pregnancy 21. Anderson et al. [14] recognized myometrial changes at term may

invesmus-

sensitive

that produces for PGF28, on

turition infusions

its

pig

concentration sponse) values significantly In the

in the sheep [9] or the rat [10]. play in stimulating uterine ac-

tivity at term in the rat is particularly tigations of the effects of prostanoids cle

[3]. to prostanoids; (PG) F28, or

similar on both days. In contrast, Tuross et no significant differences in EC50 (effective

15, 17, or

to the formulation of this hypothesis: the prostanoids are potent modifiers of myometrial contractility [4]; labor can be induced by prostanoid administration [5]; parturition can be delayed by administration of prostanoid synthesis inhibitors [6]; and prostanoid concentrations in the uterus undergo acute changes around the time of parturition Not all species respond in the same way thus it has been claimed that prostaglandin

fect appeared al. [13] found

during

pregnant

rats

of their other

effects than

concerning

pregnancy,

as evidence

the

although

that

on the inhibition effects

some

myoof

of other

evidence

suggests that they may play an important Dubin et al. [15] have presented evidence rat’s uterus produces substantial amounts

role. For instance, that the pregnant of thromboxane

(Tx) A2, which they claim ity. In the lower segment

myometrial human

could regulate of the pregnant

activuterus,

the stable Tx-mimetic U-44069 has been shown to be a potent uterotonic [16], whereas in the nonpregnant rat’s uterus a similar compound U-46619 is almost ineffective [17]. Similarly, the pregnant rat’s uterus produces large amounts

1991.

‘This work was supported by an operating grant from the MRC of Canada. It was presented in part at the Philippe Laudat Conference on the Biochemistry and Pharmacology of the Myometrium, Alsace, France, September 30-October 4, 1990. tCorrespondence: DJ Crankshaw, McMaster University, Dept of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1200 Main St. West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada LEN 3Z5. FAX: (416)5770471.

of PGI2 are potent ment 392

[18];

ineffective

and

despite

on the

the

nonpregnant

fact

that rat’s

stable uterus

PGI2

mimetics

[17], they

inhibitors of pregnant human lower uterine activity [16]. Three major questions stimulated

are segthe

PROSTANOIDS present

studs’.

sitivity metics

First,

are

there

drastic

of the pregnant rat’s uterus that might indicate that the

important ond, when

regulators measured

responses

of the

uterus

to

in the

sen-

to PGI2- and TxA2-minatural compounds are

of contractility under similar rat’s

changes

PREGNANT

AND

during pregnancy? Seccircumstances, are the

PGE2

and

PGF2C, different,

as circumstantial evidence would suggest [11, 13], thus perhaps indicating different roles for the two prostanoids? Finally, can the possible regulation of prostanoid responses during pregnancy give any clues to the question whether different prostanoids To find answers

act to

at different sites [17]? these questions, we examined

the

MYOMETRIUM

out, the tension was allowed justed to 10 mN if necessary), iment

proper

was

Measurement

and

storage

periods. of these

of the

square centimetre Spontaneous

second

half

of

AND

Animals Timed-pregnant River facilities ad

sperm housed

rats

were

St. Constant,

at 22#{176}C on

water

libitum.

a 12L: 12D

The

suppliers

purchased

from

PQ.

They

were

cycle

and

allowed

designated

Charles

kept

the

Strips

in our

food

and

morning

that

were found in the vagina after females had been overnight with a male rat as Day I of pregnancy.

When they

Wistar

Laboratories,

animals

were

normally

allowed

delivered

to reach

on

the

term

morning

in our

facilities,

of Day

in

used

ments,

only

of each used

The

Animals were killed ignated day of pregnancy.

by a blow to the head on the The entire uterus containing

products

was

(95% 02: temperature.

C02) physiological The PSS had the

5%

KC1, 4.6; MgSO4, 1.16; NaHC03, 21.9; glucose, Uteri removing

removed

were the

trimmed fetuses,

and

placed

direction. No attempt and circular muscle

dometrium. taken from tied

with

organ resting was

Most often sites adjacent silk

longitudinal to different and

monitored

through

to MA).

mm

before

that

failed and

a Grass Tissues

suspended

being to respond where

a Grass

polygraph allowed

challenged

with

with possible

vertically

isometric

strips strips

were were

90

mM

initial Force

transducer

KC1. Any to .KC1 was

The

taken

from

each per animals

each

strip. by constructing agent as we have

activity In

was

were

not

dose-response

tested

on

each

strip.

(n) refers to both the of strips since, although

were

taken

from

each

used

experiIn all

number of four strips

animal,

each

was

purpose.

sessed

Anal’’sis significance using

of differences

Student’s

test [19] using p < Values are expressed the

t-test 0.05

between

combined

as the as means

values

with

was

a multiple

as-

range

cut-off point for significance. ± the standard deviation

of

mean.

Materials except

E. Schillinger, Schering Chemical, Ann Arbor, as previously described from

Sigma

chemicals

Chemical were

from

iloprost,

which

was

AG, were obtained MI. They were prepared [17]. Indomethacin Co., BDH,

TABLE 1. Spontaneously developed circularly cut strips of myometrium

St.

Louis,

Toronto,

MO,

a gift from

Dr.

from Cayman and stored was obtained and

all

other

ON.

tension in longitudinally from pregnant rats.

and

in a 10-ml

(Grass Instruments, to equilibrate for

a contraction replaced.

Four in the

PSS at 37#{176}C. An on each strip.

FT-03

7-D were

midhorn. and four

and circular fetuses. The

for

spontaneous

prostanoid

a different

All prostanoids

made to separate lonor to remove the en-

bath containing oxygenated force of 10 mN was exerted

connected Quincy,

carded

thread

was layers

115.5;

tissue; without cut from over

the back of a fetus implanted approximately strips were cut in the longitudinal direction circular gitudinal

at room (mM):

1.16; NaCI, 0.01.

of fat and connective strips of uterus were

desthe

in gassed

salt solution (PSS) following composition

CaC12, 2.5; NaH2PO4, 11.1; indomethacin,

10-mm

22.

Preparation

of conception

strips

were determined curves to each

number number

orientation for

over

was determined by taking Activity was expressed as a

experiments. one

at 2 Hz

activity present during in terms of Newtons

record

to assess

cases, the given animals and the

quantified as we digitalization

[17]. In most experiments there was and nine concentrations of prostanoid, of these experiments equal to those in activity was assessed.

dose-response

Statistical Tissue

first

of prostanoids dose-response

described previously one control period making the length which spontaneous

METHODS

output

of pregnancy in succession.

of the

Effects cumulative MATERIALS

amplifier

(N/cm2). activity of muscle

percentage

the

(readexper-

begun.

The mean contractile periods was expressed

strips of pregnancy.

throughout

to baseline mm the

is

activity of the strips was earlier [17] b simultaneous

effects of PGF78,, PGE2, PGD2, iloprost, and U-46619 on the contractility of both longitudinally and circularly oriented myometrium

to decline and after

of Contractility

The contractile have described

at different stages ten such records

rat

393

KCI was

20 strip dis-

washed

Day 10 15 18 20 21 22

of pregnancy

Longitudi 0.9 1.7 1.2 1.7 1.0 1.1

nal strips ± ± ± ± ± ±

Circula

0.3 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.3 0.3

Tissue strips were set up and spontaneously developed termined as described in Materials and Methods. Values are means ± SD from 10 animals in each case;

0.9 1.0 1.3 1.0 0.9 0.9 tension units

r strips ± ± ± ± ± ±

0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.5

was

de-

are N/cm2.

394

CRANKSHAW CIRCULAR

AND

LONGITUDINAL

Daytl

GASPAR

tation of the strips. There were no marked differences between days for the same orientation or between tations for the same day.

DaytO

250

In general, mained fairly

150

or of the 50

once constant

orientation

of the

of the experiment. This (right panel, longitudinal DayI5

DaylS

250

Absolute

150

in the two muscle Day 22 of pregnancy

‘LI

50

-J

4 >

-J

nflflli. DayiB

0

values

DayIO

I-

z

0 50 4 U)

strips that

UHfldfl

250

150

50

1

I0 4

noon”.

duud.

Oay2i

Day2l

250

I-

z 0 C)

150

0ay22

90

10

TIME

30

50

70

90

expressed as a percentage of the activity in the n = 10-12, and errors are standard deviations

of the means. The elapsed time between the and of one measurement riod and the beginning of the next was less than 1 mm. Right-panel, gitudinally oriented strips; left-panel, circularly oriented strips.

pelon-

1 shows

veloped

by control

periment

proper,

the

values strips

against

of the during the

spontaneous the

day

on

PGE2,

prostanoid Iloprost

first

developed

was

10 mm

of pregnancy

force

circularly

consistent greater

oriented

observation tension. Re-

small.

activity

de-

of the and

The

sensitivity

maximum tension Days 18 and 20 for in responses

Day

10 and

of Day

de-

20; therethe values

development PGF28, and

to PGE2

subsequently

10. Maximum

making

declined tension

the

general

(Fig.

on

4) was

to values

generated

pattern

less exaggerated. (Fig. 5) was excitatory

TABLE 2. Effects of prostanoids from Day 22 of pregnant rats.

Agonist PGF2 PGD2 PGE2 lloprost U-46619

RESULTS Table

developed

and

close

on Day

ex-

orien-

± ± ± ± ±

0.3 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4

with

during

in circular The pattern

on longitudinal

strips

10

preg-

strips on of change

Maximal force (N/cm2) 1.6 ± 0.7 3.5 ± 2.7 2.4 ± 1.5 2.7 ± 2.0 3.6 ± 0.2

0.63

2.5 0.5 1.6 16

Negative log of the molar concentration giving ± the standard deviation of the mean. bMicromOlar concentration giving a half-maximal

this

of myometrium

EC (M)’

pD2 6.2 5.6 6.3 5.8 4.8

of change

at all times

nancy, although the tension developed Days 10 and 15 was extremely low.

(mm)

FIG. 1. Spontaneous contractile activity in strips of myometrium isolated from pregnant rats. Activity was measured over 10-mm periods as described in Materials and Methods. The height of each bar represents the activity in that time period first (control) time period;

maximum

longitudinal

of Day 10). In contrast, reached its peak between Day 22 for PGD2. The pattern of change

for 70

duration

by PGE2 was higher in both longitudinal (2-fold and 1.4fold respectively) and circular strips (4.1-fold and 4.5-fold respectively) than that generated by either PGF2C. or PGD2. However, the absolute maximum values were generally lower

Day22

50 50

between

tension

to those

150

30

and

creased, reaching a nadir between Days 18 and after it slowly increased (though it never reached

than

250

10

the

quite different. In longitudinal strips there were no significant changes in sensitivity throughout the study period, whereas in circular strips sensitivity was greater on Day 15

ui

50

for

layers in response to the prostanoids on are shown in Tables 2 and 3, respec-

were minimal except for the longitudinal strips developed

imum

>.

I> I.C.) 4 uJ

strips,

sponses to PGF2Q and PGD2 (Figs. 2 and 3) changed with very similar patterns. In early pregnancy, the rat’s uterus was highly sensitive to these two prostanoids, but the max-

Day2O

Day20

4

muscle

developed it reday of pregnancy

is shown graphically in Figure 1 strips; left panel, circular strips).

for sensitivity

Differences 150

U-

activity of the

tively. Changes in sensitivity and maximum developed forces of longitudinal and circular muscle strips to the prostanoids PGF28,, PGD2, PGE2, iloprost, and U-46619 with advancing pregnancy were complex and are represented in Figures 2-6, respectively.

250

0 0

spontaneous irrespective

either orien-

a half-maximal response.

response

PROSTANOIDS of sensitivity to iloprost resembled major exception: in both longitudinal there and

was

a significant

22. The Tx-mimetic

on

strips

U-46619

of both

be detected nor maximal

drop

(Fig.

between

6) had no

Day 18, changed

PREGNANT

a very

low

significant

whereafter significantly.

Days

could

sensitivity

uterus factors:

to prostanoids the uterus

develops

spontaneous

processes

are

[15]. In our performing

are itself

complex,

since

hampered produces

by at least prostanoids, activity.

by the the in the has been tissues

of the

duration

two and

major also

it

of

EC 6.0 ± 0.4 5.3 ± 0.2 6.2 ± 0.6 5.6 ± 0.5

1.0 5.0

U-46619

4.9

spontaneous

activity

of the

log

the standard

molar

1.3 ± 0.3 2.2 ± 1.2 1.1 ± 0.7 1.3 ± 1.2 1.3 ± 0.3

2.5 12.6 concentration

deviation

of the

concentration

giving

pregnancy by

prostanoid problem

in the

sponse

experiments

giving

a half-maximal

a half-maximal

response.

of the

difficult,

is

presence

1 are

since

spontaneous

activity

different

of tissues

obtained

shown

on

those

reported

from

Table

by others.

period measured in a stepwise

0

z

2

22 DAY

OF

PREGNANCY

OF

16 18 PREGNANCY

4

z

0

3

a, 2

Ui

I-

01

a

2

x

0 14 DAY

FIG. 2. Effects of nancy. The solid bars pD2 is the negative log is the maximal tension different from Day 22

OF

16 18 PREGNANCY

20

22

12

14 DAY

in this

1 and

Figure

Dubin

et al. found dur-

after a 15-mm equilibration fashion from Day 15 to Day

O IJJ I-

the

used

oriented strips only and activity, i.e. activity occurring

z a

presents

baseline against which an accurate description

profile

[15] studied longitudinally that the initial contractile ing a 15-mm time, increased

essentially

it

PGF2

12

response

mean.

with a constantly moving responses. Therefore,

study was necessary. The results we

of mndomethacin has been reported to be a time-dependent phenomenon [15]. Changing spontaneous activity over time within a given tissue makes the interpretation of dose-re-

10

force

(N/cm2)

0.63

± 0.1

from

Maximum

PGF2 PGD2 PGE2 lloprost

observers to measure

these

first problem was treated presence of a concentration shown to inhibit [15]. The second

of myometrium

pregnant

Both of the

strips

(p.M)b

bMicromolar

responsiveness

contractile

influenced experiments, all studies

of mndomethacin that production in similar more

the

on circular

pD2

‘Negative

DISCUSSION to describe

of prostanoids rats.

Agonist

±

Attempts

395

21

potency

effects

neither

MYOMETRIUM

TABLE 3. Effects Day 22 of pregnant

of PGE2 with one and circular strips,

in sensitivity

orientations:

before tension

that

AND

20

PGF2 on the contractile activity of isolated strips of pregnant rat’s myometrium during pregrepresent longitudinally oriented strips; the open bars represent circularly oriented strips. The of the molar concentration of prostanoid producing a half-maximal response. Maximal tension developed in response to the prostanoid; units are N/cm2. Values marked “+“ are significantly of pregnancy, Values marked “*“ are significantly different from Day 10 of pregnancy.

396

CRANKSHAW

AND

GASPAR

PGD2 4

10

z

8

0 U)

3

z

w I-

2

fHii

:

4

1

0 10

12

14

DAY

OF

16

18

20

22

10

PREGNANCY

12

14

DAY

OF

16

18

20

22

PREGNANCY

4 2 0 C’, 2

w

*

I-

01

a

0. *

4

0 10

FIG. 3. nancy. The

12

14

DAY

OF

16

18

20

22

n

I-I

10

PREGNANCY

Effects of PGD2 on the contractile solid bars represent longitudinally

activity oriented

Fi

t t

of isolated strips strips; the open

12

14

DAY

OF

16

18

20

22

PREGNANCY

of pregnant rat’s myometrium during pregbars represent circularly oriented strips. The

P02 is the negative log of the molar concentration of prostanoid producing a half-maximal response. Maximal tension is the maximal tension developed in response to the prostanoid; units are N/cm2. Values marked “+“ are significantly different from Day 22 of pregnancy; values marked ““ are significantly different from Day 10 of pregnancy.

22 of pregnancy.

In our

ferences in spontaneous 10-mm interval, which was suspended in the observed

a steady

decline

case,

there

were

no significant

dif-

activities measured during the first began about 45 mm after the tissue bath. Furthermore, Dubin et al. [15] in spontaneous

activity

over

a 60-

therefore surprising to find that in response to the prostanoids there were not any significant differences between the two layers. Tuross et al. [13] stated that “it is preferable to isolate the two muscle layers as completely as possible,

21 for lonWe cannot

since the layers are electrically coupled and the contractions of one layer are synchronized with those of the other, especially at term.” We chose not to separate the layers; our rationale for this was that the interaction between the layers is probably of physiological significance and that our in-

explain the difference between the two studies since, except for the strain of rats used (Sprague-Dawley versus Wistar) the conditions seem to be identical. Nevertheless, these

terest was in how the different layers behave when they are coupled. Furthermore, what we believe to be important physiological differences between the two layers can be

results do indicate that our method of assessing responsiveness was not compromised by fluctuations in baseline. There are a number of circumstances under which longitudinal and circular muscle of the rat’s myometrium

demonstrated when contact between them is unperturbed [21]. Similar logic prompted our decision to leave the dometrium intact. The pattern of responsiveness of the rat’s myometrium

behave quite differently. For instance, the relationship between mechanical activity and the underlying electrophysiological events is markedly different between the two layers [14]: during pregnancy, the two layers react differ-

during pregnancy pare Figs. 2-6). seen, we Tuross

ently

tO

mm period for most days of pregnancy, whereas our observations showed activity to remain relatively constant. There was a greater variability between tissues gitudinal strips and on Day 22 for circular

to catecholammnes

[20]

and

on Day strips.

to oxytocin

[13, 21]. It was

PGF2a

is clearly prostanoid-dependent Because of the complexities of the

will discuss et al. [13] on

Days

each studied 15,

prostanoid in vitro

17, and

21

in turn. myometrial in a colony

en-

(comchanges responses

of rats

that

PROSTANOIDS

AND PREGNANT

MYOMETRIUM

397

PGE2

2

0 U) 2 Ui

01

I-.

a a

4

10

12

14 DAY

16 18 PREGNANCY

OF

;

20

22

t

1:

4

2

6

3.

0 a, 2

5

Ui

01

I-

0

4

a

2

3 4

2

1#{149}

H

1

.1

-

0-

10

12

14

DAY FIG. 4. Effects of nancy. The solid bars pD2 is the negative log is the maximal tension different from Day 22

normally and

delivered

some

ours.

on

notable

They

found

that

ogous

the

muscle between

to those

Days

(0.63

and

pM).

12

14

DAY

16

OF

some

findings

to PGF2U

15 and

21; these

was

right

and no anal-

panel).

Sim-

0.83 j.&.M in longitudinal and are close to those we obtained

responses

to PGF2a changes

(compare they tween

between upper

found Days

to be

on

Day

21

fraction

and

15 and

[13]

circular

muscle

The

lower 21.

found only

magnitude

longitudinal

a progressive

a change within the

number of receptors in coupling between

right

on

Days

of responses and panels

increase It is possible

in

circular of Fig.

21.

to PGF2a muscle

circular that

17 and

strips

muscle the

differences

time. nancy on

2), whereas be-

role

nomena

in the target

Day

any of these

22 (Fig. throughout

panels).

the

later

sites

whole

over change.

differ-

with

this

for PGF2U

rat myometrium time

Day was

15.

Al-

complex,

response of the myobe regulated; among

biotransformation rate tissue; (2) a change

processes

binding

the

a significant

binding

from

is almost

2, left

between

demonstrated

in the target the receptor

observed

by

used.

at which the in vitro might

The increase in PGF2a [22] is consistent with

correlation sponse

that we

explained

compared

of changes significant

always

be

[22]

of pregnancy

though the pattern this was the only

differences. were

graded

22

of high-affinity

membrane

significant to prostanoids

et al.

in the

in

late

number

in this case both In our study,

We

a reduction

in a crude

can

Hertelendy

in the

(1)

Tuross

20

preparations

these are prostanoid

whereas

found

increase

studies

muscle

are many sites to prostanoids

to be similar

et al. [13]

two

in the

Moln#{225}rand

was are

the

ences

greatest

there results

2 (upper

between

similarities

their

17, although

layers showed the responses

18

PREGNANCY

There metrium

found

Tuross

10

22

sensitivity of both muscle layers between Days 17 and 21, but the changes were significant only in the circular layer. We made similar observations between Days 18 and 22, but

graded,

1.0

are

Day

and

20

PGE2 on the contractile activity of isolated strips of pregnant rats myometrium during pregrepresent longitudinally oriented strips; the open bars represent circularly oriented strips. The of the molar concentration of prostanoid producing a half-maximal response. Maximal tension developed in response to the prostanoid; units are N/cm2. Values marked “+“ are significantly of pregnancy; values marked ““ are significantly different from Day 10 of pregnancy.

between

in Figure

ilarly, EC50 values of 0.36 circular muscle respectively

18

PREGNANCY

response

on

shown

OF

21. There

differences

in longitudinal difference

Day

16

of the in the

tissue; and (3) a change and the final response. might

completely

play

in the

unknown

pheat this

binding sites at term of pregthe increase in sensitivity seen However, site part

number

there and

of pregnancy.

is no

direct

in vitro

re-

CRANKSHAW

398

AND GASPAR

ILOPROST 4

2

3

0 In 2

a

Ui

01

I2

a

4

0 10

12

14

DAY

16

OF

18

20

22

PREGNANCY

8

4

7 -

-

2

6

0

-

3

a) 5 01

2

__

3

0

‘t

10

p

effects

of PGD2

T

14 DAY OF

r

7

r

%

16 18 PREGNANCY

22

not reto

in vitro

3). On the basis we observed

changes in receptors or post-receptor to changes in biotransformation)

this

of the tenuous are related to

mechanisms suggests

that

(i.e., not PGF2U

and PGD2 act at the same site in the rat’s myomethum. There is now compelling evidence to suggest that the major prostanoids of the 2-series PGD2, PGE2, PGF2,, PGI2, and TxA2

respectively.

the primary that have There

ligand at one been designated is a crossover

tanoid and receptor with a lower potency there

is a wide

of a series of prostanoid DP, EP, FP, IP, and of activity

in distribution

ceptors within different tissues (for view see Coleman et a!. [23]). Evidence tention pregnant

between

(e.g., PGE2 can act at the than PGD2, the primary

diversity

of the

contraction agonists are

TP

pros-

various

re-

a comprehensive supporting our

recon-

of smooth ineffective

site the

smooth sults). ceptors occurring

OF

I

I

I

16 18 PREGNANCY

20

in the DP re-

muscles [23]. on rat uterine

muscle (Crankshaw These points argue in the

rat

and against

22

myometrium.

prostanoids

Gaspar, unpublished the presence of DP Moreover,

tested,

PGD2

only to PGF2a in systems containing ceptor [23]; in these systems, PGD2 of PGF2a. The nature of the different from those

rere-

of all naturally

is second

in

potency

exclusively acts as a less

the FP repotent an-

changes in response to POE2 to PGF2a and PGD2. There

are clearly were no

alog

significant although

DP receptor ligand), and

that PGF2a and PGD2 act at the same rat’s uterus is as follows. Action at

ceptor tends to inhibit Selective DP receptor

14 DAY

have

are each receptors

12

iloprost on the contractile activity of isolated strips of pregnant rat’s myometrium during pregrepresent longitudinally oriented strips; the open bars represent circularly oriented strips. The of the molar concentration of prostanoid producing a half-maximal response. Maximal tension developed in response to the prostanoid; units are N/cm2. Values marked “+“ are significantly of pregnancy; values marked ““ are significantly different from Day 10 of pregnancy.

on rat myometrium

Figs. 2 and the changes

I

10

been previously studied during pregnancy. In all major spects, these effects were analogous to the responses PGF2c. (compare hypothesis that

0

#{149}t#{149}t

20

ufinfi

H

4

u

12

FIG. 5. Effects of nancy. The solid bars pD2 is the negative log is the maximal tension different from Day 22

The

x

on Day change to PGE2

changes circular

in sensitivity muscle

15 than on either in electrophysiological observed

was Day

by Kuriyama

between

Days

significantly 10 or Day sensitivity and

18 and

more 22. Thus of the

Suzuki

22,

sensitive the marked rat’s uterus

[11] was

not

re-

flected in its contractile behavior. No signfficant changes in the number of high-affinity binding sites for POE2 in the rat myometrium were detected during the later part of pregnancy [22]. These results are consistent with our observations, although this consistency should not be overinterpreted. For instance, the EP receptor has been subdivided into three subtypes, the EP1, EP2, and EP3 receptors. Current evidence

suggests

that

both

EP1 and

EP3 receptors

are

pres-

PROSTANOIDS

AND PREGNANT

MYOMETRIUM

399

U-46619 10

A

2 8

0 U)

3.

2 01

w

6

I-

a

S

0. 4

2

S

I

4

2

S

0

I

I

I

10

I

I

12

14

DAY

OF

I

I

I

16

I

20

18

10

22

12

14

DAY

OF

12

14

DAY

OF

PREGNANCY.

10

16

18

20

22

20

22

PREGNANCY

4

2 8

0 U)

01

a

0.

S

0

I

I

I

10

I

I

12

14

DAY

OF

FIG. 6. Effects of nancy. The solid bars pD2 is the negative log is the maximal tension different from Day 22

ent

in rat’s

myometrium

[23].

I

it is possible that three present simultaneously

I

16

I

ii

S 4

S

0

I

18

20

22

10

late-pregnant does

not

However,

under

cyclase with the

different binding in the rat’s uterus.

human

uterus

[16],

appear

to

inhibited

be

some

cir-

in this tissue EP2 site. Thus

sites for PGE2 are These sites would

the

late-pregnant by

rat’s

a mechanism

coupled to the IP receptor. The low potency of iloprost in causing contractions of the myometrium (see Fig. 5) supports the notion that the compound can act as a weak agonist

at other

prostanoid

receptors.

under certain circumstances, rat’s myometrium [24, 25], use

of the

stable

selective

Thus,

although

stimulate adenylate there is no evidence analog

16

18

PREGNANCY

U-46619 on the contractile activity of isolated strips of pregnant rat’s myometrium during pregrepresent longitudinally oriented strips; the open bars represent circularly oriented strips. The of the molar concentration of prostanoid producing a half-maximal response. Maximal tension developed in response to the prostanoid; units are N/cm2. Values marked “+“ are significantly of pregnancy; values marked ““ are significantly different from Day 10 of pregnancy.

probably be regulated independently. Such a possibility may explain the apparent change in affinity of POE2 binding sites in the rat’s uterus that occurs postpartum [22]. Alternatively, PGE2 effects on adenylate cyclase may be mediated through IP receptors. There were no radical changes with pregnancy in the effect of the P012-mimetic compound iloprost. Thus, unlike uterus

:

PREGNANCY

cumstances, PGE2 stimulates adenylate [24], a property normally associated

the

3

2 Ui I-

iloprost

([17];

PCI2 cyclase from this

can, in the

study)

or the

even

more

selective

analog

cicaprost

(Crankshaw

and

Gaspar, unpublished results) that it can directly affect uterine motility in the rat through action at IP receptors. It therefore seems unlikely that the myometrium is the target for the large amounts at the end of pregnancy

of PG!2 [18].

produced

by the

rat

uterus

In a similar fashion, pregnancy did not bring about a radical change in the response of the rat’s uterus to the Txmimetic U-46619 when compared to the nonpregnant state [17].

The

compound

maintained

that its effects were not ceptors. This conclusion

mediated is at odds

a low

potency,

through with the

suggesting

action at TP reobservation that

platelet-generated TxA2 had a potent effect on rat uterine motility [26], although it is possible that those effects were mediated by short-lived product of arachidonate metabolism other than TxA2. They are consistent with the the Tx synthesis inhibitor, OKY-046, reduced TxA2 tion by the pregnant rat’s uterus without affecting

fact that producits mo-

tility [27]. As with PGI2, it is unlikely that the myometrium is the target for the large amounts of TxA2 produced by the rat’s

uterus

at the

end

of pregnancy

[181.

400

CRANKSHAW

The

results

of this

study

suggest,

major question that we posed, duce changes in the receptivity drastic as to indicate that PGI2 ulator of activity during role of these agents must PGF2,,

sults these

did

two

studies

not

pregnancy. be sought.

the

wide

suggested Finally,

Another Although

response

to

to

third

within

the

we

during

trical

13. Tuross

physiologic

control

of the

uterus

Biol

and

in parturition.

14. Anderson

in

4:45-66. 2. Aiken tion.

York: 3. Vane

JW. PG’s and

PG synthetase

In: Robinson

HG.

Raven

Publishers;

JR, Williams

Prostaglandins.

R, Dukes

anti-inflammatory 1972;

of the

of prostaglandin

Br J Pharmac

rat

and func-

Inhibitors.

New

Publishers;

48:629-639.

which

The

of labour

with

prosta-

AL.

Delay

of parturition

in the

of prostaglandin.

rat by Nature

240:37-38.

7. Guthrie

HD.

Control

of time

of parturition

in pigs.

J Reprod

Fertil

suppl

1985;

NH,

16. Dyal

PD, Pashen RL, Jeffcott (fluprostenol) to induce foaling.

9. Liggins sheep.

GC,

Fairclough

In: KnightJ,

Publishers;

J Reprod

RJ, Grieves

O’Connor

1977: 5-25.

LB. The

use of synthetic Fertil

Suppl

prostaglandin 1979;

SA, Forster CS, Knox

M (eds.),

The Fetus

and

Birth.

analogue

27:521-529.

BS. Parturition in the New

York:

and

longitudinal

1981;

Blake

of effects

Reprod

JM.

Effect

rats; comparison

of oxvtocin

and

pros.

the pregnant

from

rat.

of indomethacin

of circular

and

aspirin

mus-

and longitudinal

24:359-372.

BR, Egner

DA, Ghodgaonkar 1982;

of the human

PG. Thromboxane

F2,, production

B2, 6-keto.pros-

by contracting

pregnant

rat uteri

26:281-288.

DJ. The effects

R, Crankshaw

tractility

of the preg-

242:243-250.

myometrium

T, Marshall

F,,,, and prostaglandin Biol

1976;

37:348-355. in pregnant

Reprod

in vivo.

lower

uterine

of some

synthetic

segment

in vitro.

prostanoida on the conAm J Obstet Gynecol 1988;

58:281-285.

BC, Burcea

17. Wainman

I, Crankshaw

rat myometrial

DJ. The effects

longitudinal

musde

of prostanoids

in vitro.

Biol

on estrogen39:221-

Reprod

1988;

CA. Poyser

Elsevier

NL. Prostaglandins,

Br J Pharmacol DB.

Multiple

and the pregnant

thromboxanes

rat uterus

1981; 73:75-80. range

and

multiple

F tests.

Biometrics

1955;

11:1-42.

JM. Effects of catecholamines on circular and longitudinal uterine muscle of the rat. EurJ Pharmacol 1981; 76:157-165. 21. Crankshaw DJ, The sensitivity of the longitudinal and circular muscle layers of the rat’s myometrium to oxytocin in m2ro during pregnancy. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 1987; 65:773-777. 22. Moln#{225}rM, Hertelendy F. PGF2,, and PGE2 binding to rat myometrium during gestation, parturition, and postpartum. Am J Physiol 1990; 258 (Endocrinol Metab 21): E740-E747. 23. Coleman RA, Kennedy 1,Humphrey PA, Bunce K, Lumley P. Prostanoids and their El-list,

Marshall

receptors. In: Hansch of Chemical

The

Rational

Compounds,

C, Lammes vol

Evolution

from

PG, TaylorJB

Mechanistic

Design,

3, Membranes

Press; 1990: 643-714. 24. Tanfln Z, Harbon S. Heterologous

regulations a stimulatory

(eds.),

Comprehensive

Study and Therapeutic and Receptors. Oxford: of cAMP

responses

to an inhibitory

prostacyclin effect. Mol Pharmacol 1987; 32:249-257. 25. Vesin M-F, Khac LD, Harbon S. Prostacyclin as an endogenous osine cyclic 3’, 5’-monophosphate levels in rat myometrium

Mol

26. Dubin

33:229-244. 8. Rossdale

1987;

myometrium.

1979; 76:769-782.

the biosynthesis

inhibit

MF (ed),

In: Cuthbert

on the dec. J Physiol 1976;

PGF2,,, on the uterus

Pharmakol

JM. Comparison

M, Marshall

activity

Chemistry:

1972: 23-124.

Br Commonw

M, 5later SR. Walpole

to contrac-

production 1973;

of prostaglandins.

Heineman

Gynaecol

agents

motility

synthetase

RB., Hillier K, Patel RC. Induction

F2,,.J Obstet

6. Chester

on uterine

289-302

pharmacology

Trussel

studies

Prostaglandin

contributions

uterus

London:

SMM,

glandin

inhibitors:

JR (eds.),

1974:

KI. The

tion of the isolated 4. Nakano J. General 5. Karim

Vane

of labor.

228.

1980;

Perinatol

rat myometria.

of prostaglandin,

G, Kawarabayashi

Biol

18. Phillips

thromboxanes

Semin

of induction

E2 and oxytocin

pregnant

Arch

F2,, on circular

Reprod

at term.

prostacyclin,

and

and

JM. Action

N, Mahtani

taglandin

dominated

REFERENCES the

I. Failure

of prostaglandin

H. Effects

Naunyn.Schmiedebergs

taglandin

pregnancy.

GC. Role of prostaglandins,

Suzuki

of hormone.treated

0, Marshall rat.

19. Duncan

MJ, Liggins

on rat pregnancy.

260:335-349. 12. Reiner

20. Chow

Novy

effects

23:410-416.

H and

activity

15. Dubin

major

have no knowledge about changes rates of the different prostanoids

myometrium

11. Kuriyama

cle.

question, the different pattern of responses to PGE2 and PGF2C,, during pregnancy suggest that these prostanoids do indeed act at different sites in the myometrium. This conclusion is supported by binding data [22] but must be tempered by the fact that in the biotransformation

1973;

on uterine

of separate

our

Prostaglandin

Steril

nant

between

by comparison

in

AR

Fertil

our reidentical

differences

GASPAR

10. Fuchs

first

physiological responses

regulated differently, were tested under

reveal

compounds [11, 13].

to the

that pregnancy does not inof the rat’s myometrium so or TxA2 is an important reg-

and PGE2 appear to be in which both prostanoids

circumstances

in answer

AND

Pharmacol

Medicinal Application

Pergammon in pregnant

prostaglandin

rat

E2 and

modulator of adenand endometrium.

1979; 16:823-840.

NH, Blake DA, Egner PG, Ghodgaonkar BR. Effect of platelet-generated thromboxane on contractions of the pregnant rat uterus. Biol Reprod 1982; 26:289295. 27. Ghodgaonkar BR, Dubin NH. Effect of OKY-046, a selective thromboxane inhibitor on prostaglandin production and function of pregnant rat uteri and platelets. Prostaglandins Leukotrienes Med 1987; 26:33-46.

Effects of prostanoids on the rat's myometrium in vitro during pregnancy.

The objectives of this study were to determine the effects of pregnancy in the rat on the contractile response of the myometrium in vitro to a number ...
1MB Sizes 0 Downloads 0 Views