Original Article
Efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in down staging locally advanced pre-menopausal breast cancer in Eastern Nigeria: Is four courses adequate? ABSTRACT Context: Breast cancer is the most frequent cancer among women in most part of the world and in Nigeria. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has been demonstrated to be a helpful strategy in the context of locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). Aims: To determine if the use of four courses of doxorubicin based neoadjuvant chemotherapeutic regimen will result in significant primary tumor down-staging. Settings and Design: One year prospective study of premenopausal breast cancer patients presenting to the specialty breast clinic. Methods: The patients were recommended for four courses of doxorubicin based NAC and response assessed using response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) methodology. Statistical Analysis Used: Simple frequency and descriptive statistics were used to analyze data using SPSS statistical software. Results: One hundred and fourteen patients presented with breast cancer. Their ages ranged from 26 to 51 years with a mean age of 42.1 years ± 7.7 years. Thirty-one patients completed the four courses of NAC. At the end of NAC, 23 (74.2%) patients had more than 30% reduction in primary tumor size and 8 (25.8%) had no response (NR). The response according to the modified RECIST methodology was 12.9% for a complete clinical response, 61.3% for partial response, and 25.8% for NR. Significant clinical response was seen in 74.2% of patients (P < 0.0001) (one sample t-test). Conclusions: Four courses of antracycline based NAC is effective in premenopausal patients with LABC in our environment. KEY WORDS: Chemotherapy, efficacy, neoadjuvant
INTRODUCTION Breast cancer is still a major problem in most parts of the world. In Nigeria, breast cancer is the most frequent cancer among women.[1,2] African women with breast cancer present at a young age.[3,4] Nigerian women with breast cancer present with advanced disease,[5-7] and survival is noted to be poor compared to their white counterpart.[5,8] Local and distant disease control in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC), which may improve survival is still a challenge. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has been shown to be a useful strategy in the multimodal treatment of LABC, because it results in tumor down staging benefits.[9-11] A study in our patient population revealed that the number of patients on NAC progressively declined to 46% by the last cycle during a six-course treatment regimen. This was mainly due to financial reasons as the hospital is operated on a fee for service.[12] The optimal NAC regimen has not been explicitly defined. However, the typical approach consists of at least 638
Ochonma Amobi Egwuonwu, Stanley Nnamdi Anyanwu, Alexander Maduaburochukwu Nwofor Department of Surgery, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, Nnewi, Nigeria For correspondence: Dr. Ochonma Amobi Egwuonwu, Department of Surgery, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, Nnewi, Nigeria. E-mail: egwuobi@ yahoo.com
4-6 cycles of an anthracycline based regimen,[13,14] usually doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide with or without addition of taxane-based agents. If administration of lesser cycles of doxorubicin based neoadjuvant chemotherapeutic regimen results in tumor down-staging that is equivalent to full course of 6 cycles then adherence to NAC could possibly be improved within our population. The present study was designed to determine the optimal number of chemotherapy cycle for tumor down-staging in Nigerian women with LABC and investigate the correlation, if any, with primary tumor size and disease stage at presentation.
Access this article online Website: www.cancerjournal.net DOI: 10.4103/0973-1482.126463 PMID: 24518709
METHODS
Quick Response Code:
This is a prospective study conducted in Nigeria. It spanned for a 12-month period starting from June 2009 to May 2010. All pre-menopausal patients presenting with cytology/histologically confirmed Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics - October-December 2013 - Volume 9 - Issue 4
Egwuonwu, et al.: Efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in Eastern Nigeria
LABC, Stage III (A, B and C) breast cancer and T3N0M0 subset of Stage IIB who had not received any form of intervention except fine needle aspiration cytology or biopsies were eligible. The staging investigations done before and after NAC was chest X-ray, liver function test, abdomino-pelvic ultrasound scan and X-ray of the site of bone pain, if present. All pre-menopausal patients with evidence of distant metastasis demonstrable before the onset of NAC or shortly thereafter (10 cm. Of the 15 patients who had tumor sizes of ≤10 cm, 12 (80%) achieved significant clinical response but 3 (20%) did not and of the 16 patients with tumor sizes >10 cm, 11 (68.8%) had significant clinical response while 5 (31.2%) had no significant response. There was no statistically significant correlation between pre-chemotherapy primary
Pr
This is statistically significant (P < 0.0001) (one-sample T-test). The four patients who achieved cCR absconded when it was time for surgery.
AC
0
NAC = Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
At
Frequency (%) @ end of NAC 3 (9.7) 2 (6.5) 2 (6.5) 4 (12.9) 12 (38.7) 4 (12.9) 4 (12.9) 31 (100.0)
ap y
0 IIA IIB IIIA IIIB IIIC IV Total
Frequency (%) pre-chemotherapy 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (3.2) 3 (9.7) 22 (71) 5 (16.1) 0 (0) 31 (100.0%)
Maximum Diameter (cm)
Stage
When Assessment was Done Figure 1: Mean tumor size during neoadjuvant chemotherapy
tumor size and clinical response (P = 0.613) (Chi-square). The relationship between clinical stages at presentation with response to NAC is shown in Table 2. This relationship is not statistically significant (P = 0.595) (Chi-square test). DISCUSSION The mean age of the study population was 42.1 years with a range from 26 to 51 years. This is similar to 42.8 years
Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics - October-December 2013 - Volume 9 - Issue 4
Egwuonwu, et al.: Efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in Eastern Nigeria
reported in a previous study on premenopausal patients in our environment.[12] The mean age reported by other researchers are those of study population comprising pre-menopausal and post-menopausal patients, it ranged between 42.7 and 48 years.[17,18] The number of patients who completed the four courses of NAC were 31 (75.6%) out of 41 that commenced it. A study on NAC in our environment revealed that only 46% completed the six courses prescribed due to lack of funds to procure the chemotherapeutic agents as the hospital operated a fee for service.[12] This increase rate of adherence may be due to reduction in the number of courses required. The use of anthracycline based regimen for NAC results in clinical response rate ranging from 50% to 80%.[19,20] The result of this study demonstrated a statistically significant clinical response to NAC of 74.2% in pre-menopausal women receiving four courses of CAF regimen with a cCR of 12.9%. Though, in the earlier study in our environment the partial clinical response rate was higher, 89% (25 patients), 20% reduction in primary tumor diameter were used[12] as against the 30% used in this study, based on the RECIST methodology. Despite this the cCR noted in this present study is superior to that reported when six courses was used.[12] Also, the statistically significant clinical response observed is within the clinical response rate of 50-80% that have been documented by other researchers.[19,20] This would mean that prescribing six courses of NAC does not confer any significant advantage over the use of four courses in our patient population, but could result in reduced adherence to NAC in the treatment of LABC.
due to the smaller size of their primary tumors. In B18, only 13% had tumor size >5 cm and 26% with positive clinical nodal status while in B27, 70% of their study population had the primary breast tumor of 10 cm and much larger sample size (n = 82).
Fisher et al.[23] and Rastogi et al.[9] reporting on the clinical responses in the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Projects B18 and B27, noted that the clinical responses were 79% and 85% respectively with cCR rates of 36% and 40% respectively after the initial 4 cycles of AC NAC. These responses were better than what is observed in this study despite their using >50% reduction in size as cut-off for the clinical response. The higher clinical response and cCR may be
Eight (25.8%) patients showed no clinical response (NR) as defined by the modified RECIST methodology used in this study; that is, either the size of the primary tumor remained unchanged or reduction in size was < 30% or the primary tumor increased in size. Three patients had a tumor that increased in size, 2 remained unchanged while 3 had a reduction in size that was < 30%. Of the eight patients with NR, four patients (two with tumor increasing in size, one with
Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics - October-December 2013 - Volume 9 - Issue 4
641
Egwuonwu, et al.: Efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in Eastern Nigeria
tumor size unchanged and one with reduction in size < 30%) had evidence of metastasis at the end of NAC. This means that four (12.9%) patients from the study population progressed to Stage IV of which 2 (6.5%) also showed an increase in their tumor size.
maximum tumor downstaging noted after the second course, administering two or three courses of NAC could possibly improve adherence within our patient population.
Though, it has been reported that only 2-3% of patients receiving NAC have signs of progression, this study noted a higher rate of progression.[14] Moon et al. in their study noted disease progression in 7 (8.5%) of the 82 patients who is still lower than observed in this study.[22] In their study 51.3% had Stage IIIA disease while in this study, most (71%) of the patients had Stage IIIB disease with only 9.7% in Stage IIIA. This may imply that the patients in this study have more advanced disease and hence, probably higher burden of micro-metastasis.[26]
1.
REFERENCES
2. 3. 4. 5.
Bone scan, and computed tomography scans were not used for staging in this study because the facility was not available in our centre. The nearest centre where it could be done was about 600 km from our centre.
6.
The multimodal treatment policy for LABC in our centre involves administering six courses of CAF in the neoadjuvant setting or until cCR if achieved before the sixth course. The initial decision to use NAC for 6 cycles was designed on the success of adjuvant chemotherapy using 6 cycles as reported by other workers. It was during the course of the work that a consensus developed around 4 cycles for NAC. The NAC is followed by mastectomy with level two axillary dissection followed by radiotherapy to chest wall and supraclavicular area and followed by four courses of adjuvant chemotherapy. This study was not designed to follow the patients up on all the treatment modalities.
7.
Breast oncologists in Nigeria accept that NAC is a useful strategy in the management of LABC; this study may be the first that has demonstrated that four courses of antracycline based NAC is adequate for primary tumor downstaging in our patient population. It also noted that maximum reduction in tumor size was after the second course. This response is not dependent on the primary tumor size or the disease stage at presentation. This is good for our environment considering that most of our patients present with advanced disease. Hence, reducing the number of courses to two or three may result in improved adherence with early surgical intervention without compromising the benefits that NAC confers on these patients.
12.
8. 9.
10.
11.
13.
14. 15.
16.
CONCLUSION This study may be the first in Nigeria to be demonstrated that the use of four courses of doxorubicin based neoadjuvant chemotherapeutic regimen results in tumor down-staging that is equivalent to full course of 6 cycles and independent of primary tumor size and disease stage at presentation. With 642
17. 18.
Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. GLOBOCAN 2008, cancer incidence and mortality: IARC cancer base No 10. Lyon France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2010. Available from: http://www.globocan.iarc.fr. Solanke TF, Adebamowo CA. Report of the state of the art in oncology in Ibadan and Ife. UCH Ibadan: National headquarters of cancer registries in Nigeria;; 1996. Fregene A, Newman LA. Breast cancer in sub-Saharan Africa: How does it relate to breast cancer in African-American women? Cancer 2005;103:1540-50. Oluwole SF, Fadiran OA, Odesanmi WO. Diseases of the breast in Nigeria. Br J Surg 1987;74:582-5. Adesunkanmi AR, Lawal OO, Adelusola KA, Durosimi MA. The severity, outcome and challenges of breast cancer in Nigeria. Breast 2006;15:399-409. Atoyebi OA, Atimomo CE, Adesanya AA, Beredugo BK, da Rocha-Afodu JT. An appraisal of 100 patients with breast cancer seen at the Lagos University Teaching Hospital. Nig. Q J Hosp Med 1997;7:104-8. Anyanwu SN. Temporal trends in breast cancer presentation in the third world. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2008;27:17. Anyanwu SN. Survival following treatment of primary breast cancer in eastern Nigeria. East Afr Med J 2000;77:539-43. Rastogi P, Anderson SJ, Bear HD, Geyer CE, Kahlenberg MS, Robidoux A, et al. Preoperative chemotherapy: Updates of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocols B-18 and B-27. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:778-85. Maráz R, Boross G, Svébis M, Gyánti R, Vizhányó R, Hajnal L, et al. Response rates following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and breast preserving treatment in patients with locally advanced breast cancer. Magy Seb 2005;58:225-32. Beriwal S, Schwartz GF, Komarnicky L, Garcia-Young JA. Breast-conserving therapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Long-term results. Breast J 2006;12:159-64. Anyanwu SN, Nwose P, Ihekwoaba E, Mbaeri AT, Chukwuanukwu TO. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced premenopausal breast cancer in Nigerian women: Early experience. Niger J Clin Pract 2010;13:215-7. Powles TJ, Hickish TF, Makris A, Ashley SE, O’Brien ME, Tidy VA, et al. Randomized trial of chemoendocrine therapy started before or after surgery for treatment of primary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1995;13:547-52. Lee MC, Newman LA. Management of patients with locally advanced breast cancer. Surg Clin North Am 2007;87:379-98. Skeel RT. Systemic assessment of the patient with cancer and long-term consequences of treatment. In: Skeel RT, editor. Handbook of Cancer Chemotherapy. 7th ed. philadelphia: Lippincott William and Wilkin; 2008. p. 32-46. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:205-16. Adesunkanmi AR, Lawal OO, Adelusola KA, Durosimi MA. The severity, outcome and challenges of breast cancer in Nigeria. Breast 2006;15:399-409. Ikpat OF, Ndoma-Egba R, Collan Y. Influence of age and prognosis of breast cancer in Nigeria. East Afr Med J 2002;79:651-7.
Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics - October-December 2013 - Volume 9 - Issue 4
Egwuonwu, et al.: Efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in Eastern Nigeria
19. Hortobagyi GN, Singletary SE, Strom EA. Treatment of locally advanced and inflammatory breast cancer. In: Harris JR, Lippman ME, Morrow M, Osborne CK, editors. Harris Disease of Breast. 2nd ed. philadelphia???: Lippman, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2000. p. 645-60. 20. Valero V, Hortobagyi GN. Primary chemotherapy: A better overall therapeutic option for patients with breast cancer. Ann Oncol 1998;9:1151-4. 21. Chintamani M, Singhal V, Singh JP, Lyall A, Saxena S, Bansal A. Is drug-induced toxicity a good predictor of response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer?–a prospective clinical study. BMC Cancer 2004;4:48. 22. Moon YW, Rha SY, Jeung HC, Yang WI, Suh CO, Chung HC. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with infusional 5-fluorouracil, adriamycin and cyclophosphamide (iFAC) in locally advanced breast cancer: An early response predicts good prognosis. Ann Oncol 2005;16:1778-85. 23. Fisher B, Brown A, Mamounas E, Wieand S, Robidoux A, Margolese RG, et al. Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on local-regional disease in women with operable breast cancer: Findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18. J Clin Oncol 1997;15:2483-93.
24. Buzdar AU, Singletary SE, Theriault RL, Booser DJ, Valero V, Ibrahim N, et al. Prospective evaluation of paclitaxel versus combination chemotherapy with fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1999;17:3412-7. 25. Gajdos C, Tartter PI, Estabrook A, Gistrak MA, Jaffer S, Bleiweiss IJ. Relationship of clinical and pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and outcome of locally advanced breast cancer. J Surg Oncol 2002;80:4-11. 26. Rustogi A, Budrukkar A, Dinshaw K, Jalali R. Management of locally advanced breast cancer: Evolution and current practice. J Cancer Res Ther 2005;1:21-30. Cite this article as: Egwuonwu OA, Anyanwu SN, Nwofor AM. Efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in down staging locally advanced pre-menopausal breast cancer in Eastern Nigeria: Is four courses adequate?. J Can Res Ther 2013;9:638-43. Source of Support: Nil, Conflict of Interest: None declared.
Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics - October-December 2013 - Volume 9 - Issue 4
643
Copyright of Journal of Cancer Research & Therapeutics is the property of Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.