Hindawi Publishing Corporation ISRN Ophthalmology Volume 2013, Article ID 975281, 4 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/975281
Clinical Study Efficacy of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty in Medically Uncontrolled Glaucoma Nihat Sayin,1 Zeynep Alkin,2 Abdullah Ozkaya,2 Abdulvahit Demir,2 Ahmet Taylan Yazici,2 Ercument Bozkurt,2 and Ahmet Demirok2, 3 1
Zonguldak Devrek Government Hospital, Devrek, Zonguldak, Turkey Beyoglu Eye Research and Education Hospital, Bereketzade Camii Sok No. 2 Beyoglu, Istanbul, Turkey 3 Istanbul Medeniyet University, D-100 Karayolu Merdivenkoy Mevkii No. 6 Kadikoy, Istanbul, Turkey 2
Correspondence should be addressed to Nihat Sayin; [email protected] Received 25 November 2012; Accepted 18 December 2012 Academic Editors: N. Ardjomand and T. Mimura Copyright © 2013 Nihat Sayin et al. is is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Purpose. To investigate the efficacy and safety of 360∘ selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) on medically uncontrolled open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and to evaluate the effects of antiglaucomatous medications on the results of therapy. Materials and Methods. e medical records of 62 eyes of 51 patients with OAG, which did not reach the targeted intraocular pressure (IOP) with maximum antiglaucomatous medical therapy, were retrospectively reviewed. Results. A statistically signi�cant decrease was observed in the mean baseline IOP at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of followup (𝑃𝑃 𝑃 𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃). e success rate was 64.5% in all of the patients. e success rates did not vary signi�cantly by taking 1, 2, 3, or 4 medications with the rates of 63.6%, 71.4%, 64.2%, and 58.3% (𝑃𝑃 𝑃 𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃). e success rate of eyes on medication more or less than 6 months was 62.5% or 66.7%, respectively (𝑃𝑃 𝑃 𝑃𝑃𝑃). ere was a positive correlation between mean baseline IOP and mean reduction in IOP from baseline (𝑃𝑃 𝑃 𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃, 𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟). Conclusion. Application of 360∘ of SLT provided an effective and safe IOP reduction in medically uncontrolled OAG. Baseline IOP was found to be the most important factor in the efficacy of therapy.
1. Introduction Several studies have corroborated the efficacy and safety of selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) since its �rst description in 1995 by Latina and Park [1]. Selective laser trabeculoplasty, which uses a 532 nm frequency-doubled, Qswitched Nd:YAG laser, is thought to selectively stimulate the pigmented trabecular meshwork cells and thus facilitate improved aqueous out�ow in open-angle glaucoma (OAG) [2]. A synthesis of previous data suggests that SLT is effective at every stage of treatment for OAG. Selective laser therapy can be used as a �rst-line therapy, alternative to medical therapy, or as an adjunctive therapy to topical glaucoma drops [3, 4]. Although success rates and levels of reported IOP reduction vary between studies, a great number of studies show that it is a safe procedure with low complication rates [5–7]. is heterogeneity could be explained by differences
in the samples, outcomes, and treatment protocols such as power, spot numbers, and the degree of angle treated. e aims of this study were to investigate the safety and efficacy of 360∘ SLT application in patients with OAG who were not well controlled with maximal medical therapy and also to evaluate the factors that could in�uence the results including the number and type of antiglaucomatous medications, duration of medical therapy, and baseline IOP.
2. Materials and Methods is was a retrospective chart review of patients treated with SLT from April 2009 to February 2011. Approval for data collection and analysis was obtained from the ethics committee of the hospital, and all patients provided informed consent. e methodology of the study was designed in accordance with the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration.
2
2.1. Statistical Analysis. Success was de�ned as ≥20% reduction in IOP from baseline at 12 months aer treatment with no additional antiglaucomatous interventions. Visual acuity was converted to the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (log MAR) for statistical analysis. A repeated measures analysis of variance was performed to analyze the changes in BCVA and IOP from baseline to 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of therapy. When the 𝑃𝑃 value from the analysis of variance was signi�cant, pairwise comparisons were used to compare those variables at different time points. To identify the effect of baseline IOP on the reduction in IOP, we performed the Pearson correlation analysis. For analysis of
30 25 IOP (mm Hg)
Inclusion criteria were OAG (primary open-angle, pseudoexfoliation glaucoma) patients who were older than 18 years and did not reach the target intraocular pressure (IOP) with maximal medical therapy. Exclusion criteria were congenital glaucoma, any type of angle closure glaucoma, advanced-stage glaucoma, eyes with previous laser or surgical glaucoma applications, and eyes with previous anterior segment surgery within the past 6 months. Patients who could not be followed for at least 12 months were also excluded. Data recorded from each patient included age, sex, type of glaucoma, lens status, antiglaucoma medications, duration of medical therapy, systemic diseases, and the SLT protocol (number of spots and laser power settings). Baseline data were obtained for each patient before the treatment, which included the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) with ETDRS chart, slit lamp biomicroscopy, Goldmann applanation tonometry, gonioscopy, mydriatic fundoscopy, and Humphrey 30-2 computerized perimetry. Follow-ups were scheduled to take place at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months aer SLT. At each follow-up visit, an ophthalmic examination, which included visual acuity measurement, slit lamp biomicroscopy, and Goldmann applanation tonometry, was performed. Additionally, IOP in the treated eye was assessed and recorded 1 hour following SLT. If there was an IOP rise greater than 5 mm Hg from baseline IOP, the elevation of the IOP was treated with appropriate antiglaucoma medications. Immediately before the laser procedure, a single application of proparacaine hydrochloride 0.5% was instilled into the eye. All patients were treated by the same physician (N. S). e 360∘ SLT treatment protocol was performed the entire meshwork with the SLT Laserex Tango laser system (Laserex Tango, Ellex Medical, Australia) in all cases. e energy level ranged from 0.6 to 1.0 mJ. e laser energy was initially set at 0.6 mJ and a single laser pulse was delivered at the 12 o’clock position. If a cavitation bubble appeared, the laser energy was reduced by 0.1 mJ increments until no bubble formation was observed; treatment was then continued at this energy level. If no cavitation bubble was observed, the pulse energy was increased by increments of 0.1 mJ until bubble formation and then decreased as described above. Apraclonidine was instilled once aer SLT. All patients continued with the same medical treatment aer SLT. Postoperatively, the patients were prescribed �uorometholone 0.1% eye drops 4 times a day for 7 days. Any symptoms of ocular complications were recorded.
ISRN Ophthalmology
20 15 10 5 0
0
1
3
6
12
Time (months)
F 1: e course of the mean IOP during the follow-up period.
success rates in association with type, number, and duration of antiglaucoma medications, a nonparametric Fisher’s exact test was used. e statistical evaluation was performed using SPSS (Version 16.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A 𝑃𝑃 value of less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically signi�cant.
3. Results Sixty-two eyes of 51 patients were included in the study. e baseline characteristics of the patients are listed in Table 1. 3.1. Efficacy of the erapy. Aer SLT, the mean baseline IOP decreased from 20.4 ± 5.9 mm Hg to 15.4 ± 4 mm Hg, 15.2 ± 3.4 mm Hg, 16 ± 3.5 mm Hg, and 15.9 ± 3.5 mm Hg at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of therapy (𝑃𝑃 𝑃 𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃 for each), respectively, as shown in Figure 1. Out of the eyes studied, 40 (64.5%) achieved an IOP reduction of ≥20% from baseline at 12 months. e mean baseline IOP was strongly associated with the mean reduction in pressure aer SLT at 12 months (𝑃𝑃 𝑃 0.001, 𝑟𝑟 𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟). Twenty-two patients (35.5%) were on only one medication (PGA) prior to SLT treatment, 14 (22.5%) on 2 medications (𝛽𝛽-blocker, CA), 14 (22.5%) on 3 medications (PGA, 𝛽𝛽-blocker, and CA), and 12 (19.5%) on 4 medications (PGA, 𝛽𝛽-blocker, CA, and 𝛼𝛼2-agonist). e success rates did not vary signi�cantly by taking either 1 or more medications with the rates of 63.6% of eyes on 1 medication, 71.4% of eyes on 2 medications, 64.2% of eyes on 3 medications, and 58.3% of eyes on 4 medications (𝑃𝑃 𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃). e success rate of eyes on medication for more than 6 months (mean 28.2 months) was 62.5% and compared to the success rate of eyes on medication for less than 6 months (mean 2.1 months) which was 66.7%. No signi�cant difference was found at month 12 (𝑃𝑃 𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃). e mean BCVA was 0.3 ± 0.2 log MAR at baseline and 0.3 ± 0.4 log MAR at month 12; no signi�cant change was observed in the mean BCVA (𝑃𝑃 𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃). ere were no signi�cant complications during the follow-up period. ere was a minimal in�ammatory reaction (1 + cells) in 9 eyes (14.5%) at 1 hour, and none of the patients had a persistent in�ammatory reaction. A pressure spike, de�ned as an IOP elevation >5 mm Hg above pretreatment IOP, at 1 hour aer laser therapy was found in
ISRN Ophthalmology
3
T 1: Baseline characteristics of the patients included in the study. Characteristics Age ± SD Gender, female (%) Lens status, phakic (%) Baseline IOP (mm Hg) ± SD Baseline BCVA (log MAR) ± SD Systemic disease (%) Diabetes mellitus Arterial hypertension Type of glaucoma (%) POAG PEG
TM pigmentation ± SD Procedure parameters Number of laser spots ± SD Total energy ± SD
68.7 ± 9.9 48% 74.2% 20.4 ± 5.9 0.3 ± 0.2 7.8% 25.4%
54.8% 45.2%
2.3 ± 0.5
102.4 ± 21.7 80.7 ± 16
SD: standard deviation; BCVA: best corrected visual acuity; POAG: primary open-angle glaucoma; PEG: pseudoexfoliative glaucoma; TM: trabecular meshwork.
13 eyes (20.9%). Ocular discomfort, pain, and conjunctival redness were detected in 13 eyes (20.9%).
4. Discussion Previous reports showed that SLT is a viable option as a primary or adjuvant treatment for patients with ocular hypertension, POAG, and PEG [3, 8, 9]. Some authors reported that SLT may not be as effective when used in conjunction with PGAs owing to the potential of competing pathways [10]. In contrast, Singh et al. [11] suggested that the IOP-lowering efficacy of SLT is not in�uenced by the use of topical PGAs. Our results showed that success rates were not different between PGA users and 𝛽𝛽-Blocker-CA combination users. Kano et al. [12] found that the success was correlated with the preoperative IOP, but the other variables, such as age, gender, prior ALT, and angle pigmentation, were not signi�cant factors. A con�icting result from Sweden suggested that increased angle pigmentation and degree of exfoliation signi�cantly correlate with higher success rates [13]. Mao et al. [14] speculated that prolonged exposure of TM to elevated IOP may negatively affect SLT results by reducing the impact of laser treatment. In this study, SLT efficacy was positively associated with higher IOP levels before SLT treatment. Selective laser trabeculoplasty is still used by many clinicians as an adjunctive treatment, rather than a primary therapy. erefore, its performance with adjunctive medical therapy is critical in understanding its role in the glaucoma treatment algorithm. Hence, we evaluated the number, and
duration of medications before SLT. In this study, we compared the SLT success in eyes taking 1 or more antiglaucomatous medications in patients with OAG. We found no signi�cant difference in success rates between the patients who were on 1 medication and 2 or more medications. Our study also showed that the duration of antiglaucomatous medications had no effect on success rates at 12 months of therapy. However, in Song’s study, the failure rate (73%) was highest among the eyes on 4 medications, and eyes on no medication had the lowest failure rate (50%) [15]. In the same study, the groups of patients who were on a different number of medications consisted of those who received a different class of drops from those in our study. In the published studies to date, the success rate of SLT varies from 40% to 84% [3, 12, 13, 15–20]. Nagar et al. [21] reported very encouraging results in success rates of 360∘ SLT, with 80% of eyes achieving a 20% or more IOP reduction at 12 months of therapy. e effect of the SLT treatment in the present study was less potent than Nagar’s result indicated. is could be because the patients in the present study probably had lower baseline IOP than those in Nagar’s study. One hour aer SLT, 29% of the patients had an IOP spike of more than 5 mm Hg in our study. e rate of IOP spike from a previous report [21], with the rate of 27%, was comparable with our results. is study was limited by the small number of patients and by its retrospective study design. In summary, SLT treatment is an effective laser procedure for lowering IOP in OAG. Also, SLT success rates are not in�uenced by type, number, and duration of topical antiglaucomatous medications. Further long-term prospective studies on a larger subject population may likely change our results.
Summary Statement e purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of 360∘ selective laser therapy in eyes with medically uncontrolled OAG and to evaluate the effects of number, type and duration of antiglaucomatous medications before SLT. e results of this study suggested that the most potent factor in success was baseline IOP.
Acknowledgments e study was performed at the Beyoglu Eye Research and Education Hospital. e authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this paper. Neither this paper nor paper one with substantially similar content under their authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere. All the authors state that they have no con�ict of interests.
References [1] M. A. Latina and C. Park, “Selective targeting of trabecular meshwork cells: in vitro studies of pulsed and CW laser interactions,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 359–371, 1995.
4 [2] J. D. Stein and P. Challa, “Mechanisms of action and efficacy of argon laser trabeculoplasty and selective laser trabeculoplasty,” Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 140–145, 2007. [3] I. McIlraith, M. Strasfeld, G. Colev, and C. M. L. Hutnik, “Selective laser trabeculoplasty as initial and adjunctive treatment for open-angle glaucoma,” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 124–130, 2006. [4] J. S. M. Lai, J. K. H. Chua, C. C. Y. am, and D. S. C. Lam, “Five-year follow up of selective laser trabeculoplasty in Chinese eyes,” Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 368–372, 2004. [5] M. S. Juzych, V. Chopra, M. R. Banitt et al., “Comparison of long-term outcomes of selective laser trabeculoplasty versus argon laser trabeculoplasty in open-angle glaucoma,” Ophthalmology, vol. 111, no. 10, pp. 1853–1859, 2004. [6] M. Ayala and E. Chen, “Comparison of selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) in primary open angle glaucoma and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma,” Clinical Ophthalmology, vol. 5, pp. 1469–1473, 2011. [7] J. Song, P. P. Lee, D. L. Epstein et al., “High failure rate associated with 180 degrees selective laser trabeculoplasty,” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 400–408, 2005. [8] T. Gračner, “Intraocular pressure response to selective laser trabeculoplasty in the treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma,” Ophthalmologica, vol. 215, no. 4, pp. 267–270, 2001. [9] T. Gračner, “Intraocular pressure response of capsular glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma to selective Nd:YAG laser trabeculoplasty: a prospective, comparative clinical trial,” European Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 287–292, 2002. [10] N. Kara, C. Altan, B. Satana et al., “Comparison of selective laser trabeculoplasty success in patients treated with either prostaglandin or timolol�dorzolamide �xed combination,” Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and erapeutics, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 339–342, 2011. [11] D. Singh, M. A. Coote, F. O’Hare et al., “Topical prostaglandin analogues do not affect selective laser trabeculoplasty outcomes,” Eye, vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 2194–2199, 2009. [12] K. Kano, Y. Kuwayama, S. Mizoue, and N. Ito, “Clinical results of selective laser trabeculoplasty,” Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi, vol. 103, no. 8, pp. 612–616, 1999. [13] E. Chen, S. Golchin, and S. Blomdahl, “A comparison between 90 degrees and 180 degrees selective laser trabeculoplasty,” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 62–65, 2004. [14] A. J. Mao, X. J. Pan, I. McIlraith, M. Strasfeld, G. Colev, and C. Hutnik, “Development of a prediction rule to estimate the probability of acceptable intraocular pressure reduction aer selective laser trabeculoplasty in open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension,” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 449–454, 2008. [15] J. Song, P. P. Lee, D. L. Epstein et al., “High failure rate associated with 180∘ selective laser trabeculoplasty,” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 400–408, 2005. [16] T. Realini, “Selective laser trabeculoplasty: a review,” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 497–502, 2008. [17] R. Sihota, “Lasers in primary open angle glaucoma,” Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 59, supplement 1, pp. S114–S117, 2011.
ISRN Ophthalmology [18] S. Melamed, G. J. Ben Simon, and H. Levkovitch-Verbin, “Selective laser trabeculoplasty as primary treatment for openangle glaucoma: a prospective, nonrandomized pilot study,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 121, no. 7, pp. 957–960, 2003. [19] T. Gračner, D. Pahor, and B. Gračner, “Efficacy of selective laser trabeculoplasty in the treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma,” Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde, vol. 220, no. 12, pp. 848–852, 2003. [20] B. Cvenkel, “One-year follow-up of selective laser trabeculoplasty in open-angle glaucoma,” Ophthalmologica, vol. 218, no. 1, pp. 20–25, 2004. [21] M. Nagar, A. Ogunyomade, D. P. S. O’Brart, F. Howes, and J. Marshall, “A randomised, prospective study comparing selective laser trabeculoplasty with latanoprost for the control of intraocular pressure in ocular hypertension and open angle glaucoma,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 89, no. 11, pp. 1413–1417, 2005.
Copyright of ISRN Ophthalmology is the property of Hindawi Publishing Corporation and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
Clinical Study Efficacy of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty in Medically Uncontrolled Glaucoma Nihat Sayin,1 Zeynep Alkin,2 Abdullah Ozkaya,2 Abdulvahit Demir,2 Ahmet Taylan Yazici,2 Ercument Bozkurt,2 and Ahmet Demirok2, 3 1
Zonguldak Devrek Government Hospital, Devrek, Zonguldak, Turkey Beyoglu Eye Research and Education Hospital, Bereketzade Camii Sok No. 2 Beyoglu, Istanbul, Turkey 3 Istanbul Medeniyet University, D-100 Karayolu Merdivenkoy Mevkii No. 6 Kadikoy, Istanbul, Turkey 2
Correspondence should be addressed to Nihat Sayin; [email protected] Received 25 November 2012; Accepted 18 December 2012 Academic Editors: N. Ardjomand and T. Mimura Copyright © 2013 Nihat Sayin et al. is is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Purpose. To investigate the efficacy and safety of 360∘ selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) on medically uncontrolled open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and to evaluate the effects of antiglaucomatous medications on the results of therapy. Materials and Methods. e medical records of 62 eyes of 51 patients with OAG, which did not reach the targeted intraocular pressure (IOP) with maximum antiglaucomatous medical therapy, were retrospectively reviewed. Results. A statistically signi�cant decrease was observed in the mean baseline IOP at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of followup (𝑃𝑃 𝑃 𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃). e success rate was 64.5% in all of the patients. e success rates did not vary signi�cantly by taking 1, 2, 3, or 4 medications with the rates of 63.6%, 71.4%, 64.2%, and 58.3% (𝑃𝑃 𝑃 𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃). e success rate of eyes on medication more or less than 6 months was 62.5% or 66.7%, respectively (𝑃𝑃 𝑃 𝑃𝑃𝑃). ere was a positive correlation between mean baseline IOP and mean reduction in IOP from baseline (𝑃𝑃 𝑃 𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃, 𝑟𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟). Conclusion. Application of 360∘ of SLT provided an effective and safe IOP reduction in medically uncontrolled OAG. Baseline IOP was found to be the most important factor in the efficacy of therapy.
1. Introduction Several studies have corroborated the efficacy and safety of selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) since its �rst description in 1995 by Latina and Park [1]. Selective laser trabeculoplasty, which uses a 532 nm frequency-doubled, Qswitched Nd:YAG laser, is thought to selectively stimulate the pigmented trabecular meshwork cells and thus facilitate improved aqueous out�ow in open-angle glaucoma (OAG) [2]. A synthesis of previous data suggests that SLT is effective at every stage of treatment for OAG. Selective laser therapy can be used as a �rst-line therapy, alternative to medical therapy, or as an adjunctive therapy to topical glaucoma drops [3, 4]. Although success rates and levels of reported IOP reduction vary between studies, a great number of studies show that it is a safe procedure with low complication rates [5–7]. is heterogeneity could be explained by differences
in the samples, outcomes, and treatment protocols such as power, spot numbers, and the degree of angle treated. e aims of this study were to investigate the safety and efficacy of 360∘ SLT application in patients with OAG who were not well controlled with maximal medical therapy and also to evaluate the factors that could in�uence the results including the number and type of antiglaucomatous medications, duration of medical therapy, and baseline IOP.
2. Materials and Methods is was a retrospective chart review of patients treated with SLT from April 2009 to February 2011. Approval for data collection and analysis was obtained from the ethics committee of the hospital, and all patients provided informed consent. e methodology of the study was designed in accordance with the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration.
2
2.1. Statistical Analysis. Success was de�ned as ≥20% reduction in IOP from baseline at 12 months aer treatment with no additional antiglaucomatous interventions. Visual acuity was converted to the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (log MAR) for statistical analysis. A repeated measures analysis of variance was performed to analyze the changes in BCVA and IOP from baseline to 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of therapy. When the 𝑃𝑃 value from the analysis of variance was signi�cant, pairwise comparisons were used to compare those variables at different time points. To identify the effect of baseline IOP on the reduction in IOP, we performed the Pearson correlation analysis. For analysis of
30 25 IOP (mm Hg)
Inclusion criteria were OAG (primary open-angle, pseudoexfoliation glaucoma) patients who were older than 18 years and did not reach the target intraocular pressure (IOP) with maximal medical therapy. Exclusion criteria were congenital glaucoma, any type of angle closure glaucoma, advanced-stage glaucoma, eyes with previous laser or surgical glaucoma applications, and eyes with previous anterior segment surgery within the past 6 months. Patients who could not be followed for at least 12 months were also excluded. Data recorded from each patient included age, sex, type of glaucoma, lens status, antiglaucoma medications, duration of medical therapy, systemic diseases, and the SLT protocol (number of spots and laser power settings). Baseline data were obtained for each patient before the treatment, which included the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) with ETDRS chart, slit lamp biomicroscopy, Goldmann applanation tonometry, gonioscopy, mydriatic fundoscopy, and Humphrey 30-2 computerized perimetry. Follow-ups were scheduled to take place at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months aer SLT. At each follow-up visit, an ophthalmic examination, which included visual acuity measurement, slit lamp biomicroscopy, and Goldmann applanation tonometry, was performed. Additionally, IOP in the treated eye was assessed and recorded 1 hour following SLT. If there was an IOP rise greater than 5 mm Hg from baseline IOP, the elevation of the IOP was treated with appropriate antiglaucoma medications. Immediately before the laser procedure, a single application of proparacaine hydrochloride 0.5% was instilled into the eye. All patients were treated by the same physician (N. S). e 360∘ SLT treatment protocol was performed the entire meshwork with the SLT Laserex Tango laser system (Laserex Tango, Ellex Medical, Australia) in all cases. e energy level ranged from 0.6 to 1.0 mJ. e laser energy was initially set at 0.6 mJ and a single laser pulse was delivered at the 12 o’clock position. If a cavitation bubble appeared, the laser energy was reduced by 0.1 mJ increments until no bubble formation was observed; treatment was then continued at this energy level. If no cavitation bubble was observed, the pulse energy was increased by increments of 0.1 mJ until bubble formation and then decreased as described above. Apraclonidine was instilled once aer SLT. All patients continued with the same medical treatment aer SLT. Postoperatively, the patients were prescribed �uorometholone 0.1% eye drops 4 times a day for 7 days. Any symptoms of ocular complications were recorded.
ISRN Ophthalmology
20 15 10 5 0
0
1
3
6
12
Time (months)
F 1: e course of the mean IOP during the follow-up period.
success rates in association with type, number, and duration of antiglaucoma medications, a nonparametric Fisher’s exact test was used. e statistical evaluation was performed using SPSS (Version 16.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A 𝑃𝑃 value of less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically signi�cant.
3. Results Sixty-two eyes of 51 patients were included in the study. e baseline characteristics of the patients are listed in Table 1. 3.1. Efficacy of the erapy. Aer SLT, the mean baseline IOP decreased from 20.4 ± 5.9 mm Hg to 15.4 ± 4 mm Hg, 15.2 ± 3.4 mm Hg, 16 ± 3.5 mm Hg, and 15.9 ± 3.5 mm Hg at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of therapy (𝑃𝑃 𝑃 𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃 for each), respectively, as shown in Figure 1. Out of the eyes studied, 40 (64.5%) achieved an IOP reduction of ≥20% from baseline at 12 months. e mean baseline IOP was strongly associated with the mean reduction in pressure aer SLT at 12 months (𝑃𝑃 𝑃 0.001, 𝑟𝑟 𝑟 𝑟𝑟𝑟). Twenty-two patients (35.5%) were on only one medication (PGA) prior to SLT treatment, 14 (22.5%) on 2 medications (𝛽𝛽-blocker, CA), 14 (22.5%) on 3 medications (PGA, 𝛽𝛽-blocker, and CA), and 12 (19.5%) on 4 medications (PGA, 𝛽𝛽-blocker, CA, and 𝛼𝛼2-agonist). e success rates did not vary signi�cantly by taking either 1 or more medications with the rates of 63.6% of eyes on 1 medication, 71.4% of eyes on 2 medications, 64.2% of eyes on 3 medications, and 58.3% of eyes on 4 medications (𝑃𝑃 𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃). e success rate of eyes on medication for more than 6 months (mean 28.2 months) was 62.5% and compared to the success rate of eyes on medication for less than 6 months (mean 2.1 months) which was 66.7%. No signi�cant difference was found at month 12 (𝑃𝑃 𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃). e mean BCVA was 0.3 ± 0.2 log MAR at baseline and 0.3 ± 0.4 log MAR at month 12; no signi�cant change was observed in the mean BCVA (𝑃𝑃 𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃). ere were no signi�cant complications during the follow-up period. ere was a minimal in�ammatory reaction (1 + cells) in 9 eyes (14.5%) at 1 hour, and none of the patients had a persistent in�ammatory reaction. A pressure spike, de�ned as an IOP elevation >5 mm Hg above pretreatment IOP, at 1 hour aer laser therapy was found in
ISRN Ophthalmology
3
T 1: Baseline characteristics of the patients included in the study. Characteristics Age ± SD Gender, female (%) Lens status, phakic (%) Baseline IOP (mm Hg) ± SD Baseline BCVA (log MAR) ± SD Systemic disease (%) Diabetes mellitus Arterial hypertension Type of glaucoma (%) POAG PEG
TM pigmentation ± SD Procedure parameters Number of laser spots ± SD Total energy ± SD
68.7 ± 9.9 48% 74.2% 20.4 ± 5.9 0.3 ± 0.2 7.8% 25.4%
54.8% 45.2%
2.3 ± 0.5
102.4 ± 21.7 80.7 ± 16
SD: standard deviation; BCVA: best corrected visual acuity; POAG: primary open-angle glaucoma; PEG: pseudoexfoliative glaucoma; TM: trabecular meshwork.
13 eyes (20.9%). Ocular discomfort, pain, and conjunctival redness were detected in 13 eyes (20.9%).
4. Discussion Previous reports showed that SLT is a viable option as a primary or adjuvant treatment for patients with ocular hypertension, POAG, and PEG [3, 8, 9]. Some authors reported that SLT may not be as effective when used in conjunction with PGAs owing to the potential of competing pathways [10]. In contrast, Singh et al. [11] suggested that the IOP-lowering efficacy of SLT is not in�uenced by the use of topical PGAs. Our results showed that success rates were not different between PGA users and 𝛽𝛽-Blocker-CA combination users. Kano et al. [12] found that the success was correlated with the preoperative IOP, but the other variables, such as age, gender, prior ALT, and angle pigmentation, were not signi�cant factors. A con�icting result from Sweden suggested that increased angle pigmentation and degree of exfoliation signi�cantly correlate with higher success rates [13]. Mao et al. [14] speculated that prolonged exposure of TM to elevated IOP may negatively affect SLT results by reducing the impact of laser treatment. In this study, SLT efficacy was positively associated with higher IOP levels before SLT treatment. Selective laser trabeculoplasty is still used by many clinicians as an adjunctive treatment, rather than a primary therapy. erefore, its performance with adjunctive medical therapy is critical in understanding its role in the glaucoma treatment algorithm. Hence, we evaluated the number, and
duration of medications before SLT. In this study, we compared the SLT success in eyes taking 1 or more antiglaucomatous medications in patients with OAG. We found no signi�cant difference in success rates between the patients who were on 1 medication and 2 or more medications. Our study also showed that the duration of antiglaucomatous medications had no effect on success rates at 12 months of therapy. However, in Song’s study, the failure rate (73%) was highest among the eyes on 4 medications, and eyes on no medication had the lowest failure rate (50%) [15]. In the same study, the groups of patients who were on a different number of medications consisted of those who received a different class of drops from those in our study. In the published studies to date, the success rate of SLT varies from 40% to 84% [3, 12, 13, 15–20]. Nagar et al. [21] reported very encouraging results in success rates of 360∘ SLT, with 80% of eyes achieving a 20% or more IOP reduction at 12 months of therapy. e effect of the SLT treatment in the present study was less potent than Nagar’s result indicated. is could be because the patients in the present study probably had lower baseline IOP than those in Nagar’s study. One hour aer SLT, 29% of the patients had an IOP spike of more than 5 mm Hg in our study. e rate of IOP spike from a previous report [21], with the rate of 27%, was comparable with our results. is study was limited by the small number of patients and by its retrospective study design. In summary, SLT treatment is an effective laser procedure for lowering IOP in OAG. Also, SLT success rates are not in�uenced by type, number, and duration of topical antiglaucomatous medications. Further long-term prospective studies on a larger subject population may likely change our results.
Summary Statement e purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of 360∘ selective laser therapy in eyes with medically uncontrolled OAG and to evaluate the effects of number, type and duration of antiglaucomatous medications before SLT. e results of this study suggested that the most potent factor in success was baseline IOP.
Acknowledgments e study was performed at the Beyoglu Eye Research and Education Hospital. e authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this paper. Neither this paper nor paper one with substantially similar content under their authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere. All the authors state that they have no con�ict of interests.
References [1] M. A. Latina and C. Park, “Selective targeting of trabecular meshwork cells: in vitro studies of pulsed and CW laser interactions,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 359–371, 1995.
4 [2] J. D. Stein and P. Challa, “Mechanisms of action and efficacy of argon laser trabeculoplasty and selective laser trabeculoplasty,” Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 140–145, 2007. [3] I. McIlraith, M. Strasfeld, G. Colev, and C. M. L. Hutnik, “Selective laser trabeculoplasty as initial and adjunctive treatment for open-angle glaucoma,” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 124–130, 2006. [4] J. S. M. Lai, J. K. H. Chua, C. C. Y. am, and D. S. C. Lam, “Five-year follow up of selective laser trabeculoplasty in Chinese eyes,” Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 368–372, 2004. [5] M. S. Juzych, V. Chopra, M. R. Banitt et al., “Comparison of long-term outcomes of selective laser trabeculoplasty versus argon laser trabeculoplasty in open-angle glaucoma,” Ophthalmology, vol. 111, no. 10, pp. 1853–1859, 2004. [6] M. Ayala and E. Chen, “Comparison of selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) in primary open angle glaucoma and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma,” Clinical Ophthalmology, vol. 5, pp. 1469–1473, 2011. [7] J. Song, P. P. Lee, D. L. Epstein et al., “High failure rate associated with 180 degrees selective laser trabeculoplasty,” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 400–408, 2005. [8] T. Gračner, “Intraocular pressure response to selective laser trabeculoplasty in the treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma,” Ophthalmologica, vol. 215, no. 4, pp. 267–270, 2001. [9] T. Gračner, “Intraocular pressure response of capsular glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma to selective Nd:YAG laser trabeculoplasty: a prospective, comparative clinical trial,” European Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 287–292, 2002. [10] N. Kara, C. Altan, B. Satana et al., “Comparison of selective laser trabeculoplasty success in patients treated with either prostaglandin or timolol�dorzolamide �xed combination,” Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and erapeutics, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 339–342, 2011. [11] D. Singh, M. A. Coote, F. O’Hare et al., “Topical prostaglandin analogues do not affect selective laser trabeculoplasty outcomes,” Eye, vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 2194–2199, 2009. [12] K. Kano, Y. Kuwayama, S. Mizoue, and N. Ito, “Clinical results of selective laser trabeculoplasty,” Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi, vol. 103, no. 8, pp. 612–616, 1999. [13] E. Chen, S. Golchin, and S. Blomdahl, “A comparison between 90 degrees and 180 degrees selective laser trabeculoplasty,” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 62–65, 2004. [14] A. J. Mao, X. J. Pan, I. McIlraith, M. Strasfeld, G. Colev, and C. Hutnik, “Development of a prediction rule to estimate the probability of acceptable intraocular pressure reduction aer selective laser trabeculoplasty in open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension,” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 449–454, 2008. [15] J. Song, P. P. Lee, D. L. Epstein et al., “High failure rate associated with 180∘ selective laser trabeculoplasty,” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 400–408, 2005. [16] T. Realini, “Selective laser trabeculoplasty: a review,” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 497–502, 2008. [17] R. Sihota, “Lasers in primary open angle glaucoma,” Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 59, supplement 1, pp. S114–S117, 2011.
ISRN Ophthalmology [18] S. Melamed, G. J. Ben Simon, and H. Levkovitch-Verbin, “Selective laser trabeculoplasty as primary treatment for openangle glaucoma: a prospective, nonrandomized pilot study,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 121, no. 7, pp. 957–960, 2003. [19] T. Gračner, D. Pahor, and B. Gračner, “Efficacy of selective laser trabeculoplasty in the treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma,” Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde, vol. 220, no. 12, pp. 848–852, 2003. [20] B. Cvenkel, “One-year follow-up of selective laser trabeculoplasty in open-angle glaucoma,” Ophthalmologica, vol. 218, no. 1, pp. 20–25, 2004. [21] M. Nagar, A. Ogunyomade, D. P. S. O’Brart, F. Howes, and J. Marshall, “A randomised, prospective study comparing selective laser trabeculoplasty with latanoprost for the control of intraocular pressure in ocular hypertension and open angle glaucoma,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 89, no. 11, pp. 1413–1417, 2005.
Copyright of ISRN Ophthalmology is the property of Hindawi Publishing Corporation and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
