Environmental reprogramming and molecular proﬁling in reconstitution of human hair follicles Erin L. Weber and Cheng-Ming Chuong1 Department of Pathology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033
The ability to synthesize an organ de novo is the ultimate goal of regenerative medicine. Given the difﬁculty, it is reasonable to ﬁrst attempt tissue regeneration with a miniorgan, such as the hair follicle. Hair follicles (HF) undergo physiologic cyclical regeneration and cellular components exhibit robust regenerative capabilities (1, 2). The molecular biology of HF stem cells and their niche has been well characterized and scientists are poised to make progress (1). In PNAS, Higgins et al. discuss several unique ﬁndings regarding de novo human hair folliculogenesis (3). The authors show that human
scalp dermal papillae (DP), cultured in 3D, can induce hair from foreskin and identiﬁed gene candidates that may contribute to the DP phenotype. The mature HF undergoes a cyclical pattern of hair growth (anagen), regression (catagen), rest (telogen), loss (exogen), and renewal (4). Upon injury, hair ﬁlaments or follicles themselves can be lost. Regeneration of hair miniorgans can be categorized into at least four groups (Fig. 1A) (5). In the ﬁrst group, plucking of the hair causes minor injury and induces regeneration of the HF structure from epithelial stem cells and the
DP. Bulge stem cells undergo apoptosis and hair germ cells become reprogrammed to repopulate the bulge (6). Cells within the HF have robust regenerative ability, which is regulated by both the intrafollicular microenvironment (7) and the extrafollicular macroenvironment (8, 9). If we simply want to enhance hair growth, it may be practical to screen for small molecules that can modulate the macroenvironment. However, this approach will only enhance existing HFs and cannot increase the number of new follicles. The second type of regeneration involves de novo formation of new HFs after severe wounding. In mice, wound-induced neogenesis was observed in the center of a large wound (>1 cm after contraction) (10). This phenomenon is also found to occur naturally in African spiny mice, which shed large portions of full-thickness skin when threatened. This shedding is followed by extraordinarily rapid regeneration of a fully functional skin, including HFs, in 1 mo (11). Following injury, repair and regeneration may act as competitive forces, with regeneration favored in large wounds and driven by macroenvironmental signals (12). In the laboratory mouse, FGF9, which is secreted by γδ T cells, can induce a new placode (13). In spiny mice, the extracellular matrix (ECM) appears to be more loosely organized (11). After all, stem cells that give rise to this regenerative wound healing share the same genome as other cells that produce only a reparative response, suggesting that “endogenous reprogramming” has occurred. The third type of regeneration involves the reconstruction of HFs through the recombination of follicle parts. For example, the DP is implanted beneath the epidermal portion of a different HF from a different organism or body site. Successful HF regeneration from both rat and human DP cells has been demonstrated (14, 15). Here, Higgins et al. use this strategy to implant DP aggregates beneath human foreskin and are able to generate hair Author contributions: E.L.W. and C.-M.C. wrote the paper. The authors declare no conﬂict of interest. See companion article on page 19679.
Fig. 1. (A) Cycling hair follicles with four different types of hair regeneration, listed on the side (5). (B) Deﬁning the engineered hair follicle (27). 19658–19659 | PNAS | December 3, 2013 | vol. 110 | no. 49
To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]
Weber and Chuong
ated when intact DP, or DP cells grown in 3D hanging-drop cultures, were placed between the foreskin layers. Interestingly, some ECM and signaling molecules were up-regulated upon spherical culture, and Higgins et al. identify FLI1 (friend leukemia virus integration 1) as a potential master transcriptional regulator of many rescued genes (3). Although the murine model is helpful for research, folliculogenesis is only clinically useful if achieved with human cells. The most accessible source of human skin is neonatal foreskin. Early studies demonstrated that, although the foreskin epidermis is able to form HFs in combination with a murine DP, the foreskin dermis lacks the necessary cell populations or signals (24). Until recently, only fetal dermal and epidermal cells from the second trimester were known to generate hair follicles (18). Here, a naturally hairless human epidermis (the foreskin) and the human DP are shown to generate hairs, a ﬁnding that has also recently been noted by other groups (3, 25, 26). The engineering procedure may sometimes generate aberrant architecture. It is important that engineered structures meet the criteria that deﬁne an HF (Fig. 1B) (27). A true follicle should possess normal structure, including distally located DP and transitamplifying cells, proximally located differentiating cells arranged in concentric layers, and a sebaceous gland. In addition, the structure should be able to cycle repeatedly, generating
a new hair shaft while extruding the old one, and must undergo extrafollicular regulation appropriate to age and body location. Here, we brieﬂy reviewed recent progress toward the regeneration, reconstruction, and reconstitution of HFs, highlighting the Higgins et al. (3) report. Much work remains to be done before a clinically useful human HF is generated. Research points to three requirements for HF formation: (i) a competent epidermis, (ii) DP cells that retain hair inductivity, and (iii) epithelial-mesenchymal signaling. Because formation of the DP is felt to be one of the initial steps in folliculogenesis, molecular characterization of the DP is a main focus. The DP phenotype requires a papilla-speciﬁc transcriptional proﬁle, paracrine signals from the epidermis, interaction with the ECM, and 3D organization. As more details emerge, reprogramming of the DP cell should be possible. Step by step, scientists are moving toward rebuilding hair follicles and providing new treatment for severe burn and trauma patients. We hope that success in HF neogenesis can pave the way for de novo organogenesis on a greater scale.
1 Hsu YC, Pasolli HA, Fuchs E (2011) Dynamics between stem cells, niche, and progeny in the hair follicle. Cell 144(1):92–105. 2 Chuong CM, Randall VA, Widelitz RB, Wu P, Jiang TX (2012) Physiological regeneration of skin appendages and implications for regenerative medicine. Physiology (Bethesda) 27(2):61–72. 3 Higgins CA, Chen JC, Cerise JE, Jahoda CAB, Christiano AM (2013) Microenvironmental reprogramming by three-dimensional culture enables dermal papilla cells to induce de novo human hair-follicle growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:19679–19688. 4 Stenn KS, Paus R (2001) Controls of hair follicle cycling. Physiol Rev 81(1):449–494. 5 Chueh SC, et al. (2013) Therapeutic strategy for hair regeneration: Hair cycle activation, niche environment modulation, wound-induced follicle neogenesis, and stem cell engineering. Expert Opin Biol Ther 13(3):377–391. 6 Ito M, Kizawa K, Toyoda M, Morohashi M (2002) Label-retaining cells in the bulge region are directed to cell death after plucking, followed by healing from the surviving hair germ. J Invest Dermatol 119(6):1310–1316. 7 Kandyba E, et al. (2013) Competitive balance of intrabulge BMP/Wnt signaling reveals a robust gene network ruling stem cell homeostasis and cyclic activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(4):1351–1356. 8 Plikus MV, et al. (2011) Self-organizing and stochastic behaviors during the regeneration of hair stem cells. Science 332(6029):586–589. 9 Festa E, et al. (2011) Adipocyte lineage cells contribute to the skin stem cell niche to drive hair cycling. Cell 146(5):761–771. 10 Ito M, et al. (2007) Wnt-dependent de novo hair follicle regeneration in adult mouse skin after wounding. Nature 447(7142):316–320. 11 Seifert AW, et al. (2012) Skin shedding and tissue regeneration in African spiny mice (Acomys). Nature 489(7417):561–565. 12 Chuong CM (2007) Regenerative biology: New hair from healing wounds. Nature 447(7142):265–266. 13 Gay D, et al. (2013) Fgf9 from dermal γδ T cells induces hair follicle neogenesis after wounding. Nat Med 19(7):916–923. 14 Jahoda CA, Reynolds AJ, Oliver RF (1993) Induction of hair growth in ear wounds by cultured dermal papilla cells. J Invest Dermatol 101(4):584–590.
15 Reynolds AJ, Lawrence C, Cserhalmi-Friedman PB, Christiano AM, Jahoda CA (1999) Trans-gender induction of hair follicles. Nature 402(6757):33–34. 16 Lichti U, et al. (1993) In vivo regulation of murine hair growth: Insights from grafting deﬁned cell populations onto nude mice. J Invest Dermatol 101(1, Suppl):124S–129S. 17 Zheng Y, et al. (2005) Organogenesis from dissociated cells: Generation of mature cycling hair follicles from skin-derived cells. J Invest Dermatol 124(5):867–876. 18 Zheng Y, et al. (2010) Mature hair follicles generated from dissociated cells: A universal mechanism of folliculoneogenesis. Dev Dyn 239(10):2619–2626. 19 Lee LF, Jiang TX, Garner W, Chuong CM (2011) A simpliﬁed procedure to reconstitute hair-producing skin. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 17(4):391–400. 20 Veraitch O, et al. (2013) Human induced pluripotent stem cellderived ectodermal precursor cells contribute to hair follicle morphogenesis in vivo. J Invest Dermatol 133(6):1479–1488. 21 Rendl M, Lewis L, Fuchs E (2005) Molecular dissection of mesenchymalepithelial interactions in the hair follicle. PLoS Biol 3(11):e331. 22 Ohyama M, Kobayashi T, Sasaki T, Shimizu A, Amagai M (2012) Restoration of the intrinsic properties of human dermal papilla in vitro. J Cell Sci 125(Pt 17):4114–4125. 23 Higgins CA, Richardson GD, Ferdinando D, Westgate GE, Jahoda CAB (2010) Modelling the hair follicle dermal papilla using spheroid cell cultures. Exp Dermatol 19(6):546–548. 24 Ehama R, et al. (2007) Hair follicle regeneration using grafted rodent and human cells. J Invest Dermatol 127(9):2106–2115. 25 Thangapazham RL, et al. (2013) Dissociated human dermal papilla cells induce hair follicle neogenesis in grafted dermalepidermal composites. J Invest Dermatol, 10.1038/jid.2013.337. 26 Toyoshima KE, et al. (2012) Fully functional hair follicle regeneration through the rearrangement of stem cells and their niches. Nat Commun 3:784. 27 Chuong CM, Cotsarelis G, Stenn K (2007) Deﬁning hair follicles in the age of stem cell bioengineering. J Invest Dermatol 127(9):2098–2100.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Grants AR 60306 and 43177 (to C.-M.C.) and by a California Institute for Regenerative Medicine Clinical Fellow Training Grant and an American College of Surgeons Resident Research Scholarship (to E.L.W.).
PNAS | December 3, 2013 | vol. 110 | no. 49 | 19659
(3), although it remains to be determined whether the new hair epithelia is derived from existing epidermal progenitors or a respeciﬁcation of cellular fates. The fourth type of regeneration is the reconstitution of HFs from dissociated cells via tissue engineering. The ﬁrst success with this type of regeneration was shown using a chamber assay (16). The patch assay, in which dissociated murine dermal and epidermal cell populations were injected into murine hypodermis, resulted in the more rapid and efﬁcient formation of cycling HFs, albeit with disoriented, internalized hair shafts (17). Successful HF formation was demonstrated with embryonic cells from several mammals and high conservation of the basic stages of HF regeneration was noted (18). In the planar hair-forming assay (19), dissociated dermal and epidermal cells are applied as a slurry to a full-thickness murine wound and properly oriented, anatomically accurate HFs extrude externally in 3 wk and can cycle. These procedures allow the expansion of cells through culture and it is possible to use embryonic stem cells or induced pluripotent stem cells (20). To reprogram adult cells to become DP, one needs to know the molecular proﬁles of inductive DP and ﬁbroblasts. The signature transcriptional proﬁle of the newborn murine DP has been elucidated using microarray (21). However, although this process highlights which genes may be important for the DP phenotype, it does not easily indicate the set of factors that will successfully reprogram a ﬁbroblast into a DP cell. A similar microarray was performed using human adult scalp DP (22). Surprisingly, the transcriptional proﬁle appears to be much different from what would be expected to simply explain a loss of regenerative capacity. Higgins et al. have identiﬁed fresh insights into the transcriptional proﬁle of the human DP cell (3). Culture of adult human DP cells in 2D was associated with a rapid alteration in gene expression. Downstream targets of the Wnt signaling pathway were signiﬁcantly downregulated. However, 3D organization partially rescued the DP signature, resulting in a geneexpression proﬁle that is more to similar to that of cells of an intact DP. Although only 22% of the altered genes were rescued by 3D culture and other key signature DP genes likely remain underexpressed, this study provides unique information for reprogramming. In addition to gene expression, the spatial organization of cells is also important. This group has shown that growth of DP cells in 3D prolongs the phenotype (23). Here, sandwiching of human DP cells grown in 2D culture between the epidermal and dermal layers of human neonatal foreskin did not produce HFs (3). However, HFs were gener-