Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 50 (2016) 125–132

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/semcdb

The regulation of oncogenic Ras/ERK signalling by dual-specificity mitogen activated protein kinase phosphatases (MKPs) Andrew M. Kidger, Stephen M. Keyse ∗ CR-UK Stress Response Laboratory, Division of Cancer Research, Jacqui Wood Cancer Centre, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK

a r t i c l e

i n f o

Article history: Received 6 January 2016 Accepted 6 January 2016 Available online 11 January 2016 Keywords: MAP kinase Extracellular signal-regulated kinase MAP kinase phosphatase Dual-specificity phosphatase DUSP5 DUSP6/MKP-3 Ras oncogene

a b s t r a c t Dual-specificity MAP kinase (MAPK) phosphatases (MKPs or DUSPs) are well-established negative regulators of MAPK signalling in mammalian cells and tissues. By virtue of their differential subcellular localisation and ability to specifically recognise, dephosphorylate and inactivate different MAPK isoforms, they are key spatiotemporal regulators of pathway activity. Furthermore, as they are transcriptionally regulated as downstream targets of MAPK signalling they can either act as classical negative feedback regulators or mediate cross talk between distinct MAPK pathways. Because MAPKs and particularly Ras/ERK signalling are implicated in cancer initiation and development, the observation that MKPs are abnormally regulated in human tumours has been interpreted as evidence that these enzymes can either suppress or promote carcinogenesis. However, definitive evidence of such roles has been lacking. Here we review recent work based on the use of mouse models, biochemical studies and clinical data that demonstrate key roles for MKPs in modulating the oncogenic potential of Ras/ERK signalling and also indicate that these enzymes may play a role in the response of tumours to certain anticancer drugs. Overall, this work reinforces the importance of negative regulatory mechanisms in modulating the activity of oncogenic MAPK signalling and indicates that MKPs may provide novel targets for therapeutic intervention in cancer. © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Contents 1. 2.

3. 4.

Dual-specificity MAP kinase phosphatases: spatiotemporal regulators of MAP kinase signalling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125 ERK-specific MKPs and cancer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127 2.1. DUSP6/MKP-3: a potential tumour suppressor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127 2.2. DUSP6/MKP-3 may be pro-oncogenic in certain tumour types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127 2.3. DUSP5: a nuclear ERK phosphatase and tumour suppressor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128 ERK-specific MKPs and sensitivity to anti-cancer drugs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129 3.1. Modulation of DUSP6/MKP-3 levels modifies the response to targeted therapies in lung cancer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129 Conclusions and remarks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130 Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131

1. Dual-specificity MAP kinase phosphatases: spatiotemporal regulators of MAP kinase signalling A subfamily of 10 catalytically active dual-specificity protein phosphatases are dedicated to the task of negatively regulating the mammalian mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) by dephosphorylating both tyrosine and threonine residues of the

∗ Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected] (S.M. Keyse).

signature T-X-Y motif located within the activation loop of the kinase [1–3]. These MAPK phosphatases (MKPs or DUSPs) can be broken down into three subgroups based on sequence homology, subcellular localisation and substrate specificity. There are four inducible nuclear MKPs; DUSP1/MKP-1, DUSP2, DUSP4/MKP-2 and DUSP5. Three MKPs; DUSP6/MKP-3, DUSP7 and DUSP9/MKP-4 are both cytoplasmic and ERK selective while a further three MKPs; DUSP8, DUSP10/MKP-5 and DUSP16/MKP-7 preferentially inactivate the stress-activated c-Jun amino-terminal kinase (JNK) and p38 MAPKs (Fig. 1A). These enzymes share a highly conserved structure comprising of a non-catalytic N-terminal domain and a C-terminal catalytic domain. The latter contains the highly con-

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.01.009 1084-9521/© 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

126

A.M. Kidger, S.M. Keyse / Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 50 (2016) 125–132

Fig. 1. (A) List of the mammalian dual specificity MAP kinase phosphatases broken down into three groups by sequence similarity, subcellular localisation and substrate specificity. The ERK-specific phosphatases DUSP5 and DUSP6/MKP-3, which are the main subject of the experimental work covered in this review are highlighted in red. ND, not determined. (B) Schematics showing the domain structures of DUSP5 and DUSP6/MKP-3 highlighting the disposition of the kinase interaction motif (KIM) and localisation signals located within the N-terminal non catalytic domain and the catalytic site within the C-terminal domain.

served protein tyrosine phosphatase (PTPase) active site sequence (I/V)HCXAGXXR(S/T/G). The N-terminal domain contains a conserved modular sequence known as the kinase interaction motif (KIM), which mediates differential recognition and binding of MAPK substrates and also harbours either nuclear localisation (NLS) or export (NES) signals, which determine subcellular localisation (Fig. 1B) [4]. Interestingly, in a subset of MKPs the conformation of the active site in the absence of substrate is not optimal for catalysis. However, when a MAPK substrate is engaged via the KIM, this causes an allosteric rearrangement of the active site residues within the C-terminal catalytic domain resulting in catalytic activation, a process thought to underpin greater substrate selectivity [5,6]. Finally, The observation that the KIM-mediated binding of MKPs to their cognate substrates by interaction with the conserved MAPK common docking (CD) domain does not require phosphorylation and activation of the MAPK itself has led to the idea that MKPs, by sequestering inactive MAPKs within either the nucleus or the cytoplasm, may regulate the spatial localisation as well as the duration and magnitude of signalling [7]. Many of the genes that encode MKPs are themselves highly inducible and in many cases the activity of one or more MAPK pathways is responsible for transcriptional up regulation of these enzymes. Thus, individual MKPs can act as classical negative feedback regulators of pathway activity, but can also mediate crosstalk between distinct MAPK modules. The fact that MAPK

signalling and in particular the activity of the Ras–extracellular signal-regulated kinase (Ras/ERK) pathway is often abnormally activated in human cancers, suggests that MKPs may also be regulated as a result of the oncogenic activation of MAPK signalling. This idea is reinforced by several studies demonstrating that negative feedback control of Ras/ERK signalling by MKPs may play an important role in determining the biological outcome of signalling when upstream components of this pathway such as receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), Ras isoforms or Braf are mutated and activated [8,9]. This idea is also supported by numerous observations of either increased or decreased MKP expression in malignant disease, suggesting that these enzymes might play some role in cancer initiation and/or progression [10,11]. However, despite the large number of reported studies of MKP dysregulation the majority of both in vitro and tumour studies rely heavily on the overexpression of MKPs and/or correlations between MKP expression levels and clinical stage/outcome in relatively small patient cohorts. There is therefore a need for more defined genetic studies of MKP function in validated mouse models of cancer in which Ras/ERK signalling is implicated, coupled with more systematic analyses of MKP expression in large clinical cohorts before firm conclusions can be reached as to the role and significance of MKPs in malignant disease. Here we review a number of recent studies using a variety of approaches including pharmacological and genetic manipulation of MKP expression or activity, which point towards specific roles for

A.M. Kidger, S.M. Keyse / Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 50 (2016) 125–132

individual MKPs in either the suppression or promotion of carcinogenesis in human malignancies in which abnormal activation of the Ras/ERK pathway is an established driver of cancer development. Furthermore, there is also an increasing body of evidence suggesting that MKPs may play an important role in determining the outcome of either conventional or novel anti-cancer drugs that target components of this pathway. Overall, these studies indicate that MKPs play complex and context dependent roles in both tumour initiation and development and in drug responses, but there are also indications that under certain circumstances the manipulation of MKP activity or expression might be used to gain therapeutic advantage in cancer treatment.

127

nude mice [26]. However, the latter studies should be treated with considerable caution as overexpression of DUSP6/MKP-3 using constitutively active heterologous promoters may result in complete or near complete ablation of ERK activity. As ERK activation is known to be required for S-phase entry and cell proliferation [27,28], it is possible that the ectopic expression of non-physiological levels of DUSP6/MKP-3 may result in artefactual suppression of tumour cell proliferation and growth. Clearly, mouse models of Ras and Brafinduced cancers coupled with DUSP6 gene knockout and a more rigorous assessment of DUSP6/MKP-3 levels in larger cohorts of human tumours will be instrumental in clarifying the possible role of DUSP6/MKP-3 as a tumour suppressor. 2.2. DUSP6/MKP-3 may be pro-oncogenic in certain tumour types

2. ERK-specific MKPs and cancer 2.1. DUSP6/MKP-3: a potential tumour suppressor DUSP6/MKP-3 was the first MKP with absolute substrate specificity for ERK, as opposed to either JNK or p38, to be characterised [12,13]. The enzyme is cytoplasmic and this, coupled with its high ERK binding affinity, led to the demonstration that it can act as both a regulator of and cytoplasmic anchor for ERKs [14]. DUSP6/MKP-3 expression is growth factor inducible and this phosphatase plays a key role in the regulation of fibroblast growth factor (FGF) -dependent ERK activation during early embryonic development [15,16]. Despite early confusion as to which Ras effector pathway signals to the DUSP6/MKP-3 promoter, with both phosphatidylinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) and ERK signalling implicated in its regulation, it is now clear that DUSP6/MKP-3 is an ERK target gene and that it acts as a classical negative feedback regulator of ERK activity, both in a developmental context and in primary and cancer cell lines [16–18]. Furthermore, DUSP6/MKP-3 is one of a small group of genes that is consistently upregulated in response to elevated ERK signalling in cancer cells harbouring activating mutations in either Ras or Braf, where it is presumed to restrain oncogenic ERK signalling [19–21]. Perhaps the most compelling evidence for a role for DUSP6/MKP3 as a tumour suppressor has come from studies of pancreatic cancer in which 90% of tumours contain activating mutations in Kras. Although there is no evidence of mutation within the DUSP6 gene, mRNA expression levels are consistently lower in pancreatic cancer cell lines when compared to immortalised normal pancreatic ductal cells [22,23]. Analysis of DUSP6/MKP-3 expression in pancreatic tumours revealed that protein levels were increased in early pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN), but then reduced in more advanced invasive or poorly differentiated tumours, a result confirmed in a more extensive study [22,24]. At the molecular level the loss of DUSP6/MKP-3 expression in both pancreatic tumour cell lines and in advanced pancreatic cancer was correlated with the methylation of CpG sequences in intron 1 of the DUSP6 gene, suggesting that epigenetic silencing was responsible for lower levels of DUSP6 transcription [23]. Overall this data was interpreted as evidence that DUSP6/MKP-3 is associated with progression from early PanINs to invasive ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Similar data has also implicated DUSP6/MKP-3 as a tumour suppressor in mutant Kras-driven lung tumours, where expression levels showed an inverse relationship with both growth activity and histological grade. Loss of heterozygosity of the DUSP6 locus was also found in 17.7% of lung cancer cases and was associated with reduced expression levels [25]. In vitro studies seemingly support this interpretation; ectopic expression of DUSP6/MKP-3 in either pancreatic or lung cancer cells resulted in the suppression of cell growth and apoptosis [22,25], while expression of DUSP6/MKP-3 in Hras transformed fibroblasts caused a significant delay in tumour formation after injection into

While the work outlined above suggests a tumour suppressor role for DUSP6/MKP-3, other studies have indicated that this phosphatase may be oncogenic. DUSP6/MKP-3 is upregulated in human glioblastoma cell lines. Overexpression of DUSP6/MKP-3 in these cells led to the expected reduction in proliferation rate, but also affected cell morphology with DUSP6/MKP-3-overexpressing cells exhibiting a more flattened appearance, lower levels of cellular detachment after stimulation with EGF and an increased propensity to form colonies in soft agar. Surprisingly, mouse xenograft experiments showed that tumours arising from glioblastoma cells expressing DUSP6/MKP-3 grew significantly faster than non-expressing controls perhaps reflecting these changes in cell adhesion and morphology [29]. Overexpression of DUSP6 has also been identified in a subset of mouse melanoma cell lines, where it is associated with enhanced anchorage-independent growth and invasive capacity [30] and overexpression of DUSP6/MKP-3 in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) cell lines is associated with increased cell migration and invasion [31]. However, perhaps the most persuasive data implicating DUSP6/MKP-3 as a pro-oncogenic phosphatase has come from a recent study of pre-B cell transformation in acute lymphoblastoid leukemia (ALL) [32]. Müschen and colleagues noted that the acute activation of oncogenes such as BCR-Abl or NrasG12D in human pre-B cells invariably led to cell death. However, the small fraction of cells that survived and became transformed all exhibited increased expression of negative regulators of ERK signalling including DUSP6/MKP-3, the transcription factor ERM (Ets related molecule, also known as Ets Variant Gene 5, ETV5) and sprouty-2 (Spry-2). These findings were extended to pre-B ALL cells, which unlike normal pre-B cells, were also primed to express negative regulators of the ERK pathway. This up regulation was dependent on both BCR-Abl and ERK activity as evidenced by sensitivity to a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) (Imatinib) or MEK inhibitor (PD325901). Interestingly, DUSP6 mRNA levels were a robust and independent predictor of outcome for adults with Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+ ) (BRCAbl-driven) ALL, with higher than median DUSP6 mRNA levels correlating with shorter overall survival [32]. To explore the specific relevance of DUSP6/MKP-3, B cell lineage and myeloid progenitor cells obtained from the bone marrow of DUSP6−/− mice and wild-type controls were transformed with BCR-Abl1. Interestingly, while the myeloid progenitors transformed with BCR-Abl1 showed a higher colony forming ability in the absence of DUSP6/MKP3, indicating a tumour suppressor function, the colony formation of DUSP6−/− B cell lineage leukaemia was significantly reduced, consistent with a positive role for this phosphatase in malignant transformation. In a series of further experiments using conditional expression of NrasG12D in pre-B cells from wild type and DUSP6−/− mice, only cells from the wild type mice were susceptible to transformation and shRNA-mediated knockdown of DUSP6 significantly reduced the colony forming ability of human pre-B ALL cells. Furthermore, the growth of pre-B cells transduced with BCR-Abl

128

A.M. Kidger, S.M. Keyse / Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 50 (2016) 125–132

in the presence of Imatinib was strictly dependent on DUSP6 after washing out the inhibitor, again showing that pre-B ALL cells are dependent on robust DUSP6/MKP-3-mediated negative feedback control of ERK signalling for continued growth and survival [32]. Perhaps the most provocative series of experiments presented in this study involve the use of a pharmacological inhibitor of DUSP6/MKP-3 activity to validate the hypothesis that this phosphatase might be a therapeutic target in human ALL. BCI (2-benzylidene-3-(cyclohexylamino)-1-Indanone hydrochloride) was first identified in a screen for compounds which were able to increase FGF signalling output in Zebrafish embryos and DUSP6/MKP-3 was identified as the relevant biological target. Biochemical studies indicated that BCI specifically inhibits DUSP6/MKP-3 by preventing the ERK-dependent allosteric changes that occur within the active site, thus preventing catalytic activation [33]. In support of this, BCI caused a rapid increase in ERK activity in patient-derived Ph+ ALL cells. Furthermore, the increased ERK signalling was associated with increased levels of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) and p53-mediated cell death. When ALL cells with hyperactive ERK were chronically treated with MEK inhibitor they adapted to normal growth in its presence. However, washout of the drug caused a subsequent “rebound” of ERK activity and sensitised cells to treatment with BCI by a factor of approximately 6. This strongly suggests that there is a threshold of ERK-signaling that has to be overcome to trigger BCIinduced apoptosis. Finally, mouse xenograft experiments using Ph+ ALL cells derived from patients after relapse during ongoing therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors showed these to be insensitive to Imatinib, but significantly sensitive to treatment with BCI, indicating that this drug may be of utility in treating TKI-resistant Ph+ ALL [32]. These experiments demonstrate a lineage specific effect of DUSP6/MKP-3, with the phosphatase acting as a tumour suppressor in myeloid cells, but as an essential mediator of malignancy in pre-B cells and suggest that this undue reliance on negative feedback regulators of ERK activity may present a vulnerability and reveal novel drug targets in pre-B cell malignancy. However, some caution must be exercised in the interpretation of the experiments using BCI. Although active against DUSP6/MKP-3, this drug is acknowledged to be both non-specific with respect to MKPs and is also relatively toxic. As deletion of DUSP6/MKP-3 is tolerated in the mouse [34], the whole organism and cellular toxicity exhibited by BCI is highly likely to reflect off-target effects. This interpretation is also supported by the observed inhibition of PI3-kinase-akt signalling, coupled with a global reduction in levels of cellular phosphotyrosine observed in the BCI-treated Ph+ ALL cells. BCI contains an electrophilic ␣,␤-unsaturated ketone moiety, which is often viewed as a liability in drug development due to non-selective modification of cellular nucleophiles. This is acknowledged in a recent publication in which derivatives of BCI have been synthesised in an attempt to reduce this toxicity while retaining activity towards DUSP6/MKP-3 [35]. It will be interesting to determine if these derivatives, several of which show equivalent or higher potency as inhibitors of DUSP6/MKP3, but are considerably less toxic, can also selectively kill transformed pre-B ALL cells.

nuclear counterpart of DUSP6/MKP-3 in regulating the spatiotemporal activity of the Ras/ERK pathway. As mentioned previously, both DUSP5 and DUSP6/MKP-3 are amongst a subset of genes, which are often upregulated in tumours and cancer cell lines in which Ras/MAPK signalling is activated. Loss of DUSP5 expression has been detected in advanced gastric and prostate cancers, where its loss correlates with a poor patient outcome. Furthermore, the re-expression of DUSP5 in gastric cancer cell lines reduced both cell proliferation and colony forming ability in vitro [38,39]. While these limited studies indicate that DUSP5 might act as a tumour suppressor, they rely on correlation between expression level and clinical outcome coupled with over expression of DUSP5 in vitro. However, a recent study using a combination of genetic and biochemical studies has now provided the first evidence of a bona fide tumour suppressor function for DUSP5 [40]. In order to dissect the role of DUSP5 in Ras-induced tumourigenesis, mice were generated in which the DUSP5 gene was deleted by homologous recombination and found to be both viable and fertile. Animals were then studied using the well-established DMBA/TPA-inducible multi-stage skin carcinogenesis protocol in which DMBA-induced Hras mutations at codon 61 (HrasQ61L ) drive skin papilloma induction. Mice lacking DUSP5 developed twice as many skin tumours when compared with wild type animals, while mice lacking one copy of DUSP5 showed an intermediate phenotype. Loss of DUSP5 did not influence the mechanism of carcinogenesis as 90% of the DUSP5−/− papillomas contained the signature HrasQ61L mutation, nor was tumour morphology or size affected by DUSP5 deletion. In searching for a mechanistic basis for this increased tumourigenesis, the spatiotemporal regulation of ERK signalling was studied using high-content microscopy, which allowed both the visualisation and quantification of levels of nuclear and cytoplasmic phospho-ERK (p-ERK) and total ERK

2.3. DUSP5: a nuclear ERK phosphatase and tumour suppressor DUSP5 is one of four closely related inducible nuclear MKPs. However, it is unique within this subgroup that unlike DUSP1/MKP1, DUSP2 or DUSP4/MKP-2 it is devoid of activity towards the stress activated MAPKs, acting as an ERK selective phosphatase [36]. Furthermore, transcriptional induction of DUSP5 in response to growth factor stimulation is ERK dependent and it can also bind and sequester inactive ERK in the nucleus when expressed in mammalian cells [36,37]. Thus, DUSP5 can be regarded as the

Fig. 2. Loss of the inducible ERK-specific phosphatase encoded by DUSP5 specifically affects nuclear ERK signalling and gene expression. Loss of DUSP5 synergises with mutant HrasQ61L leading to higher levels of nuclear p-ERK. This selectively up-regulates a small number of ERK target genes, including the gene encoding serpinB2. It is the increased expression of the latter protein that leads to the increased sensitivity to DMBA/TPA induced skin papillomas in DUSP5 knockout mice.

A.M. Kidger, S.M. Keyse / Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 50 (2016) 125–132

in TPA-treated mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEFs). These studies revealed two major effects of DUSP5 loss in these cells. Firstly, levels of nuclear p-ERK were significantly higher at early times after TPA stimulation in DUSP5−/− cells compared to wild type MEFs, a result also confirmed using biochemical cell fractionation. Secondly, levels of total ERK were much lower in the knockout MEFs at later times after stimulation. Importantly, both phenotypes could be reversed by the adenoviral expression of wild-type DUSP5, but not a KIM mutant (DUSP5R53/54A ), expressed under the control of the early growth response 1 (Egr1) promoter. Microarray experiments in TPA-treated MEFs revealed that DUSP5 loss caused the increased expression of a small subset of TPA-inducible ERK-dependent genes and that serpinB2 (also known as plasminogen activator inhibitor 2, PAI2) was expressed at the highest level after DUSP5 deletion. Furthermore, DUSP5 loss synergises with mutant HrasQ61L in driving ERK-dependent serpinB2 expression in TPA treated MEFs (Fig. 2). Interestingly, serpinB2 had previously been identified as a promoter of DMBA–TPA carcinogenesis when expressed in the skin of transgenic mice under the control of the bovine keratin 5 promoter [41] and combining DUSP5 deletion with loss of serpinB2 completely reversed the sensitivity to carcinogenesis caused by DUSP5 loss. Overall this work demonstrates that DUSP5 has an essential non-redundant function in regulating both the activity and localisation of nuclear ERK signalling and that DUSP5 also acts as a tumour suppressor to limit the oncogenic potential of mutant HrasQ61L in this cancer model [40]. At present the precise mechanism by which increased serpinB2 expression promotes tumour development is unclear, but it may involve intracellular functions, rather than its canonical role as a secreted inhibitor of extracellular proteases [42]. It will be very interesting to determine if DUSP5 plays a wider role as a tumour suppressor in more clinically relevant mouse models of Hras or Braf-driven cancers such as pancreas, lung or intestinal tumours and to determine the extent to which it is deregulated in a wider range of human cancers. Interestingly, mice lacking DUSP5 also display prolonged eosinophil survival and enhanced eosinophil effector functions following experimental helminth infection. Microarray experiments in interleukin-33 (IL-33) stimulated wild type and DUSP5−/− eosinophils also revealed changes in ERK-dependent gene expression caused by DUSP5 loss [43]. Experiments looking at the expression of genes involved in the regulation of cell death revealed a novel mechanism by which DUSP5 regulates eosinophil survival through increased ERK-dependent expression of the anti-apoptotic BL2 family member BCL-XL . This indicates that the effects of DUSP5 deletion on gene expression may be lineage and/or stimulus specific. It is therefore possible that DUSP5 loss may affect oncogenic ERK signalling differently, depending on the tissue and cellular context.

129

Fig. 3. In NSCLC cells harbouring activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and treated with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) Gefitinib, Ras/ERK and PI3-kinase-Akt signalling are inhibited. However, while Akt activity remains low, Ras/ERK pathway activity recovers. This recovery is driven in part by the activity of the Src tyrosine kinase, but also by the loss of expression of the ERKspecific phosphatase DUSP6/MKP-3. Loss of DUSP6 expression is secondary to the continued inhibition of Akt activity by Gefinitib, resulting in lower levels of the transcription factor Ets1, which normally transactivates the DUSP6 gene promoter to increase expression. This elevated Ras/ERK pathway activity contributes to TKI resistance by reducing the level of the pro-apoptotic Bcl2 family protein Bim-EL, thus promoting cell survival in the continued presence of the drug.

a well-established positive regulator of apoptotic cell death [11]. In contrast, the role of ERK-specific phosphatases has been less well defined. However, recent publications have indicated that these enzymes may play a more complex role in mediating drug resistance in human lung cancers with their drug-induced down regulation facilitating the re-activation of Ras/ERK signalling in treated cells, thus aiding cell survival and promoting resistance to therapy. 3.1. Modulation of DUSP6/MKP-3 levels modifies the response to targeted therapies in lung cancer

3. ERK-specific MKPs and sensitivity to anti-cancer drugs In addition to their roles in the genesis and development of cancer it has long been appreciated that MAPK signalling is an important determinant of cell and tissue responses to many physical and chemical agents used in cancer therapy. Thus MKPs, as regulators of MAPK activity, have also been implicated in modulating cancer cell/tumour sensitivity to both chemotherapeutic drugs and radiation. Probably the most widely studied of the MKPs in this regard is DUSP1/MKP-1, an inducible nuclear MKP, which shows activity towards all three major MAPKs in the rank order JNK > p38 = ERK [44]. DUSP1/MKP-1 has been implicated in acquired or intrinsic resistance to a wide range of anti tumour drugs including cisplatin, taxanes, anthracyclins and doxorubicin. In most of these cases, resistance has been linked with the increased expression of DUSP1/MKP-1 and its substrate preference for JNK, which is

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most prevalent form of this disease accounting for approximately 85% of cases. Of these, a significant fraction (∼15%) contain activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) making the development and use of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) a focus of drug therapy in this disease [45,46]. However, despite the efficacy of these drugs in target inhibition, only a very small fraction of patients (∼5%) achieve a near complete tumour response and it has been speculated that a portion of these non-responders may have intrinsic, rather than acquired, resistance to TKIs [47]. A recent study has explored these resistance mechanisms by dissecting out the molecular machinery by which the Ras/ERK pathway is activated after EGFR inhibition in NSCLC cells [48]. Using cancer cell lines that express mutant forms of EGFR, it was demonstrated that exposure to the TKI gefitinib (Iressa) caused

130

A.M. Kidger, S.M. Keyse / Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 50 (2016) 125–132

cell death in approximately 95% of treated cells. However, the surviving cells were both resistant to the drug and capable of both proliferating and forming colonies in vitro, a result consistent with a mechanism of innate resistance. Biochemical analysis of these cells revealed that although TKI treatment effectively blocked EGFR activation, it only caused a transient blockade of downstream ERK activation, with a marked rebound in ERK activity in the continued presence of the drug. This TKI-induced ERK reactivation was supressed by a MEK inhibitor and Ras activity was also essential, as evidenced by its sensitivity to a dominant negative mutant of Kras (KrasS17N ). Surprisingly, the continued activity of the Ras/ERK pathway was not due to the activation of non-EGFR RTKs or the Src tyrosine kinase in these cells [48], the latter of which is known to cause activation of the Ras/MAPK pathway in cells harbouring mutant EGFR [49], indicating that ERK must be reactivated by an additional (as yet undefined) mechanism. A survey of the expression profiles of protein phosphatases in cells exposed to another EGFR TKI erlotinib (Tarceva) revealed that the drug caused a significant reduction in the expression of DUSP6/MKP-3, a result confirmed at the mRNA and protein level in EGFR mutant NSCLC cells in the presence of gefitinib. Furthermore, adenoviral expression of DUSP6 in NSCLC cells in the presence of TKI blocked the reactivation of ERK despite the continued activation of Ras and MEK. The loss of DUSP6 expression was secondary to loss of the transcription factor Ets1, which is known to regulate ERKdependent DUSP6/MKP-3 transcription in both fibroblasts and lung cancer cells [17,18]. In an unexpected twist, it was shown that the loss of Ets1 expression was due to TKI-mediated inhibition of PI3kinase signalling, rather than any change in ERK activity and that DUSP6 expression could be rescued by expression of a constitutively active form of Akt. Finally, the mechanism by which the elevated ERK activity engendered by TKI treatment of NSCLC cells enhances survival was identified as the increased ERK-dependent phosphorylation of the extra long isoform of the pro-apoptotic BH3 only Bcl-2 family member Bim (Bim EL) (Fig. 3). This promotes its proteosomal degradation and thus blocks cell death. This study shows an unexpected convergence of ERK and Akt signalling in the regulation of Ets1 and its target genes including DUSP6/MKP-3 and demonstrates that loss of DUSP6/MKP-3 plays a key role in reinforcing the increased ERK signalling that is coupled to cell survival in the face of specific EGFR inhibitors in NSCLC [48]. In addition to EGFR mutations, a significant fraction of NSCLC is caused by expression of a fusion between echinoderm microtubuleassociated protein-like 4 (ELM4) and the RTK anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) [50]. These ELM4-ALK positive tumours, like those with mutations in EGFR, either show a lack of response to ALKspecific TKIs such as crizotinib (Xalkori) or relapse with drug resistant disease [51]. In an attempt to identify molecular mechanisms, which might limit the effectiveness of ALK inhibitors, Hrustranovic et al. [52] studied the effect of inhibiting downstream signalling pathways in ELM4-ALK lung adenocarcinoma cells. They found that inhibitors of ERK signalling were equally as effective as ALK inhibitors in causing decreased cell growth. In contrast, constitutive activation of Ras/ERK signalling enabled cells to survive and even proliferate in the presence of crizotinib, thus revealing a specific requirement for ERK signalling in these lung adenocarcinoma cells. How ELM4–ALK actually engages the Ras/ERK pathway was unclear, particularly as the fusion protein lacks the transmembrane domain within ALK that would normally anchor the RTK within the plasma membrane and facilitate interactions with downstream effectors. In this regard they investigated a unique hydrophobic echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like protein (HELP) domain within ELM4, reasoning that this might facilitate membrane association of the ELM4–ALK fusion and facilitate downstream signalling to ERK. In agreement with this hypothesis, wild type ELM4–ALK protein localised to discrete intra-

cellular compartments and activated Ras/ERK signalling, while a mutant lacking the HELP domain showed diffuse staining and failed to activate ERK [52]. These findings led to the suggestion that ALK inhibitors combined with a sub maximal dose of a MEK inhibitor might be more effective than a TKI such as crizotinib alone. This was verified using both in vitro and in vivo (mouse xenograft) experiments in which the combined drug regimen was far more effective in blocking both ERK activity and tumour growth when compared with treatment using either drug alone. On the basis of these findings they also hypothesised that acquired resistance to ALK-specific TKIs was highly likely to involve reactivation of the Ras/ERK pathway and this was confirmed in experiments in which ELM4–ALK positive lung cancer cells were rendered drug resistant by chronic exposure to crizotinib. In a series of experiments to determine the likely mechanism of this resistance, exome sequencing revealed an increased copy number for the gene encoding wild type Kras in one line of crizotinib resistant cells and in a study of tumour biopsies taken from patients with acquired resistance to TKI therapy 3 out of 15 patients (20%) had focal amplification of Kras indicating that this is a bona fide resistance mechanism to ALK-specific TKIs in lung adenocarcinoma. However, other TKI resistant cell lines had relatively low Ras activity, but still displayed high basal ERK activation, indicating that other mechanisms are at play in the rescue of Ras/ERK activity in these cells [52]. A survey of dual-specificity MKP expression in parental and drug resistant ELM4–ALK lung cancer cells revealed that while the parental cells had high levels of DUSP6 mRNA expression the drug resistant cells consistently had lower levels of this phosphatase. Stable reconstitution of DUSP6/MKP-3 restored both sensitivity to crizotinib and the ability of this drug to supress ERK signalling while shRNA-mediated knockdown of DUSP6/MKP-3 promoted crizotinib resistance in parental ELM4–ALK lung adenocarcinoma cells and this was accompanied by rescue of ERK activation. Finally, in a survey of either drug naïve (n = 15) or drug resistant (n = 10) ELM4–ALK patient tumours DUSP6/MKP-3 protein levels as detected and scored by immunohistochemical staining were significantly lower in the drug resistant samples, while in 5 out of 6 (80%) of paired tumour biopsies from patients taken either before or after drug treatment DUSP6 expression was lower in the resistant samples. Taken together, these biochemical and clinical studies strongly implicate the down regulation of DUSP6/MKP-3 as a driver of ERK-dependent resistance to TKI therapy in ELM4–ALK positive lung adenocarcinomas [52]. Either mutations in EGFR or expression of the ELM4–ALK fusion drive tumourigenesis in almost 20% of NSCLC cases worldwide. In both cases either acquired or intrinsic resistance to EGFR or ALKtargeted TKIs is driven by reactivation of the Ras/ERK signalling pathway and a major factor in this reactivation and the genesis of drug resistance is loss of DUSP6/MKP-3. In the case of EGFR mutant tumours, DUSP6/MKP-3 loss appears secondary to down regulation of the transcription factor and ERK signalling target Ets1, while the mechanism of DUSP6/MKP-3 down regulation in ELM4–ALK tumour cells was not studied. It will be interesting to see if similar mechanisms operate in other tumour types and there are indications that this may well be the case. For instance, the prolonged use of MET (hepatocyte growth factor receptor [HGFR]) RTK inhibitors in gastric cancer cell lines in vitro results in loss of DUSP6/MKP-3 expression, which correlates with increased levels of p-ERK [53] while loss of DUSP6/MKP-3 in ovarian cancer has also been linked with cisplatin resistance [54].

4. Conclusions and remarks From the experimental evidence reviewed above it is now clear that dual-specificity MAP kinase phosphatases play a key role in

A.M. Kidger, S.M. Keyse / Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 50 (2016) 125–132

the regulation and outcome of oncogenic signalling through the Ras/ERK pathway. From studies of the inducible nuclear phosphatase DUSP5, it is also clear that these effects can reflect not only their activity towards the ERK1/2 MAP kinases but also their spatial localisation. Perhaps not surprisingly, individual MKPs can exhibit either tumour suppressor function or can act as pro-oncogenic regulators of Ras/ERK signalling and this may depend on the differing and tissue-specific thresholds of ERK activity that are either permissive for or promote cell proliferation or conversely cause cell cycle arrest/senescence or cell death. Obviously, where tumour suppressor functions for MKPs are manifest, then specific inhibition is to be avoided. However, in those malignancies in which MKPs have a proven role in promoting tumour growth, then such inhibitors may be of therapeutic use. As a class of enzymes, cysteine-dependent protein tyrosine phosphatases, of which the MKPs are a subfamily, have been amongst the most difficult targets against which to develop specific inhibitors [55]. However, the emergence of chemical entities, which target the allosteric activation of MKPs, which occurs on MAPK binding, rather than the active site itself, offer the promise that more selective and less toxic agents can be developed and tested. Finally, studies of the regulation and role of DUSP6/MKP-3 in cellular responses to RTK inhibitors have revealed that loss of function may play a key role in resistance to these drugs. This reinforces the importance of signalling plasticity and pathway remodelling in the emergence of drug resistance and it is perhaps no surprise that MKPs, as major regulators of MAPK activity, are key players in this process.

[15]

[16]

[17]

[18]

[19]

[20]

[21]

[22]

[23]

[24]

[25]

Acknowledgements S.M.K is supported by a programme grant from Cancer Research UK (C8227/A12053). A.M.K. is supported by a Dundee Cancer Centre Studentship. The authors would like to thank Dr Jim Caunt (University of Bath) for critical reading of this manuscript.

[26]

[27]

References

[28]

[1] A. Theodosiou, A. Ashworth, MAP kinase phosphatases, Genome Biol. 3 (2002), REVIEWS3009. [2] M. Camps, A. Nichols, S. Arkinstall, Dual specificity phosphatases: a gene family for control of MAP kinase function, FASEB J. 14 (2000) 6–16. [3] S.M. Keyse, Protein phosphatases and the regulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase signalling, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 12 (2000) 186–192. [4] D.M. Owens, S.M. Keyse, Differential regulation of MAP kinase signalling by dual-specificity protein phosphatases, Oncogene 26 (2007) 3203–3213. [5] M. Camps, A. Nichols, C. Gillieron, B. Antonsson, M. Muda, C. Chabert, et al., Catalytic activation of the phosphatase MKP-3 by ERK2 mitogen-activated protein kinase, Science 280 (1998) 1262–1265. [6] A.E. Stewart, S. Dowd, S.M. Keyse, N.Q. McDonald, Crystal structure of the MAPK phosphatase Pyst1 catalytic domain and implications for regulated activation, Nat. Struct. Biol. 6 (1999) 174–181. [7] C.J. Caunt, S.M. Keyse, Dual-specificity MAP kinase phosphatases (MKPs): shaping the outcome of MAP kinase signalling, FEBS J. 280 (2013) 489–504. [8] C.A. Pratilas, B.S. Taylor, Q. Ye, A. Viale, C. Sander, D.B. Solit, et al., (V600E)BRAF is associated with disabled feedback inhibition of RAF–MEK signaling and elevated transcriptional output of the pathway, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106 (2009) 4519–4524. [9] S. Courtois-Cox, S.M. Genther Williams, E.E. Reczek, B.W. Johnson, L.T. McGillicuddy, C.M. Johannessen, et al., A negative feedback signaling network underlies oncogene-induced senescence, Cancer Cell 10 (2006) 459–472. [10] S.M. Keyse, Dual-specificity MAP kinase phosphatases (MKPs) and cancer, Cancer Metastasis Rev. 27 (2008) 253–261. [11] C. Nunes-Xavier, C. Roma-Mateo, P. Rios, C. Tarrega, R. Cejudo-Marin, L. Tabernero, et al., Dual-specificity MAP kinase phosphatases as targets of cancer treatment, Anticancer Agents Med. Chem. 11 (2011) 109–132. [12] L.A. Groom, A.A. Sneddon, D.R. Alessi, S. Dowd, S.M. Keyse, Differential regulation of the MAP, SAP and RK/p38 kinases by Pyst1, a novel cytosolic dual-specificity phosphatase, EMBO J. 15 (1996) 3621–3632. [13] M. Muda, U. Boschert, R. Dickinson, J.C. Martinou, I. Martinou, M. Camps, et al., MKP-3, a novel cytosolic protein–tyrosine phosphatase that exemplifies a new class of mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatase, J. Biol. Chem. 271 (1996) 4319–4326. [14] M. Karlsson, J. Mathers, R.J. Dickinson, M. Mandl, S.M. Keyse, Both nuclear-cytoplasmic shuttling of the dual specificity phosphatase MKP-3 and

[29]

[30]

[31]

[32]

[33]

[34]

[35]

[36]

[37]

[38]

[39]

131

its ability to anchor MAP kinase in the cytoplasm are mediated by a conserved nuclear export signal, J. Biol. Chem. 279 (2004) 41882–41891. M.C. Eblaghie, J.S. Lunn, R.J. Dickinson, A.E. Munsterberg, J.J. Sanz-Ezquerro, E.R. Farrell, et al., Negative feedback regulation of FGF signaling levels by Pyst1/MKP3 in chick embryos, Curr. Biol. 13 (2003) 1009–1018. C. Li, D.A. Scott, E. Hatch, X. Tian, S.L. Mansour, DUSP6 (MKP3) is a negative feedback regulator of FGF-stimulated ERK signaling during mouse development, Development 134 (2007) 167–176. M. Ekerot, M.P. Stavridis, L. Delavaine, M.P. Mitchell, C. Staples, D.M. Owens, et al., Negative-feedback regulation of FGF signalling by DUSP6/MKP-3 is driven by ERK1/2 and mediated by Ets factor binding to a conserved site within the DUSP6/MKP-3 gene promoter, Biochem. J. 412 (2008) 287–298. Z. Zhang, S. Kobayashi, A.C. Borczuk, R.S. Leidner, T. Laframboise, A.D. Levine, et al., Dual specificity phosphatase 6 (DUSP6) is an ETS-regulated negative feedback mediator of oncogenic ERK signaling in lung cancer cells, Carcinogenesis 31 (2010) 577–586. K.M. Haigis, K.R. Kendall, Y. Wang, A. Cheung, M.C. Haigis, J.N. Glickman, et al., Differential effects of oncogenic K-Ras and N-Ras on proliferation, differentiation and tumor progression in the colon, Nat. Genet. 40 (2008) 600–608. L.M. Packer, P. East, J.S. Reis-Filho, R. Marais, Identification of direct transcriptional targets of (V600E)BRAF/MEK signalling in melanoma, Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 22 (2009) 785–798. S. Vartanian, C. Bentley, M.J. Brauer, L. Li, S. Shirasawa, T. Sasazuki, et al., Identification of mutant K-Ras-dependent phenotypes using a panel of isogenic cell lines, J. Biol. Chem. 288 (2013) 2403–2413. T. Furukawa, M. Sunamura, F. Motoi, S. Matsuno, A. Horii, Potential tumor suppressive pathway involving DUSP6/MKP-3 in pancreatic cancer, Am. J. Pathol. 162 (2003) 1807–1815. S. Xu, T. Furukawa, N. Kanai, M. Sunamura, A. Horii, Abrogation of DUSP6 by hypermethylation in human pancreatic cancer, J. Hum. Genet. 50 (2005) 159–167. T. Furukawa, R. Fujisaki, Y. Yoshida, N. Kanai, M. Sunamura, T. Abe, et al., Distinct progression pathways involving the dysfunction of DUSP6/MKP-3 in pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia and intraductal papillary–mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas, Mod. Pathol. 18 (2005) 1034–1042. K. Okudela, T. Yazawa, T. Woo, M. Sakaeda, J. Ishii, H. Mitsui, et al., Down-regulation of DUSP6 expression in lung cancer: its mechanism and potential role in carcinogenesis, Am. J. Pathol. 175 (2009) 867–881. S. Marchetti, C. Gimond, D. Roux, E. Gothie, J. Pouyssegur, G. Pages, Inducible expression of a MAP kinase phosphatase-3-GFP chimera specifically blunts fibroblast growth and Ras-dependent tumor formation in nude mice, J. Cell. Physiol. 199 (2004) 441–450. A. Brunet, D. Roux, P. Lenormand, S. Dowd, S. Keyse, J. Pouyssegur, Nuclear translocation of p42/p44 mitogen-activated protein kinase is required for growth factor-induced gene expression and cell cycle entry, EMBO J. 18 (1999) 664–674. J.G. Albeck, G.B. Mills, J.S. Brugge, Frequency-modulated pulses of ERK activity transmit quantitative proliferation signals, Mol. Cell 49 (2013) 249–261. S. Messina, L. Frati, C. Leonetti, C. Zuchegna, E. Di Zazzo, A. Calogero, et al., Dual-specificity phosphatase DUSP6 has tumor-promoting properties in human glioblastomas, Oncogene 30 (2011) 3813–3820. W. Li, L. Song, A.M. Ritchie, D.W. Melton, Increased levels of DUSP6 phosphatase stimulate tumourigenesis in a molecularly distinct melanoma subtype, Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 25 (2012) 188–199. D. Degl’Innocenti, P. Romeo, E. Tarantino, M. Sensi, G. Cassinelli, V. Catalano, et al., DUSP6/MKP3 is overexpressed in papillary and poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma and contributes to neoplastic properties of thyroid cancer cells, Endocr. Relat. Cancer 20 (2013) 23–37. S. Shojaee, R. Caeser, M. Buchner, E. Park, S. Swaminathan, C. Hurtz, et al., Erk negative feedback control enables pre-B cell transformation and represents a therapeutic target in acute lymphoblastic leukemia, Cancer Cell 28 (2015) 114–128. G. Molina, A. Vogt, A. Bakan, W. Dai, P. Queiroz de Oliveira, W. Znosko, et al., Zebrafish chemical screening reveals an inhibitor of Dusp6 that expands cardiac cell lineages, Nat. Chem. Biol. 5 (2009) 680–687. M. Maillet, N.H. Purcell, M.A. Sargent, A.J. York, O.F. Bueno, J.D. Molkentin, DUSP6 (MKP3) null mice show enhanced ERK1/2 phosphorylation at baseline and increased myocyte proliferation in the heart affecting disease susceptibility, J. Biol. Chem. 283 (2008) 31246–31255. V.N. Korotchenko, M. Saydmohammed, L.L. Vollmer, A. Bakan, K. Sheetz, K.T. Debiec, et al., In vivo structure–activity relationship studies support allosteric targeting of a dual specificity phosphatase, ChemBioChem 15 (2014) 1436–1445. M. Mandl, D.N. Slack, S.M. Keyse, Specific inactivation and nuclear anchoring of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 2 by the inducible dual-specificity protein phosphatase DUSP5, Mol. Cell. Biol. 25 (2005) 1830–1845. A. Kucharska, L.K. Rushworth, C. Staples, N.A. Morrice, S.M. Keyse, Regulation of the inducible nuclear dual-specificity phosphatase DUSP5 by ERK MAPK, Cell. Signal. 21 (2009) 1794–1805. S.H. Shin, S.Y. Park, G.H. Kang, Down-regulation of dual-specificity phosphatase 5 in gastric cancer by promoter CpG island hypermethylation and its potential role in carcinogenesis, Am. J. Pathol. 182 (2013) 1275–1285. C. Cai, J.Y. Chen, Z.D. Han, H.C. He, J.H. Chen, Y.R. Chen, et al., Down-regulation of dual-specificity phosphatase 5 predicts poor prognosis of patients with prostate cancer, Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 8 (2015) 4186–4194.

132

A.M. Kidger, S.M. Keyse / Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 50 (2016) 125–132

[40] L.K. Rushworth, A.M. Kidger, L. Delavaine, G. Stewart, S. van Schelven, J. Davidson, et al., Dual-specificity phosphatase 5 regulates nuclear ERK activity and suppresses skin cancer by inhibiting mutant Harvey-Ras (HRasQ61L)-driven SerpinB2 expression, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 111 (2014) 18267–18272. [41] H.M. Zhou, I. Bolon, A. Nichols, A. Wohlwend, J.D. Vassalli, Overexpression of plasminogen activator inhibitor type 2 in basal keratinocytes enhances papilloma formation in transgenic mice, Cancer Res. 61 (2001) 970–976. [42] D.R. Croucher, D.N. Saunders, S. Lobov, M. Ranson, Revisiting the biological roles of PAI2 (SerpinB2) in cancer, Nat. Rev. Cancer 8 (2008) 535–545. [43] D.A. Holmes, J.H. Yeh, D. Yan, M. Xu, A.C. Chan, DUSP5 negatively regulates IL-33-mediated eosinophil survival and function, EMBO J. 34 (2015) 218–235. [44] D.N. Slack, O.M. Seternes, M. Gabrielsen, S.M. Keyse, Distinct binding determinants for ERK2/p38alpha and JNK map kinases mediate catalytic activation and substrate selectivity of map kinase phosphatase-1, J. Biol. Chem. 276 (2001) 16491–16500. [45] S. Lampaki, G. Lazaridis, K. Zarogoulidis, I. Kioumis, A. Papaiwannou, K. Tsirgogianni, et al., Defining the role of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in early stage non-small cell lung cancer, J. Cancer 6 (2015) 568–574. [46] A. Russo, T. Franchina, G.R. Ricciardi, A. Picone, G. Ferraro, M. Zanghi, et al., A decade of EGFR inhibition in EGFR-mutated non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): old successes and future perspectives, Oncotarget 6 (2015) 26814–26825. [47] C.S. Tan, D. Gilligan, S. Pacey, Treatment approaches for EGFR-inhibitor-resistant patients with non-small-cell lung cancer, Lancet Oncol. 16 (2015) e447–e459.

[48] J. Phuchareon, F. McCormick, D.W. Eisele, O. Tetsu, EGFR inhibition evokes innate drug resistance in lung cancer cells by preventing Akt activity and thus inactivating Ets-1 function, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 112 (2015) E3855–E3863. [49] M. Donepudi, M.D. Resh, c-Src trafficking and co-localization with the EGF receptor promotes EGF ligand-independent EGF receptor activation and signaling, Cell. Signal. 20 (2008) 1359–1367. [50] M. Soda, Y.L. Choi, M. Enomoto, S. Takada, Y. Yamashita, S. Ishikawa, et al., Identification of the transforming EML4–ALK fusion gene in non-small-cell lung cancer, Nature 448 (2007) 561–566. [51] M.M. Awad, A.T. Shaw, ALK inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer: crizotinib and beyond, Clin. Adv. Hematol. Oncol. 12 (2014) 429–439. [52] G. Hrustanovic, V. Olivas, E. Pazarentzos, A. Tulpule, S. Asthana, C.M. Blakely, et al., RAS–MAPK dependence underlies a rational polytherapy strategy in EML4–ALK-positive lung cancer, Nat. Med. 21 (2015) 1038–1047. [53] A.Z. Lai, S. Cory, H. Zhao, M. Gigoux, A. Monast, M.C. Guiot, et al., Dynamic reprogramming of signaling upon met inhibition reveals a mechanism of drug resistance in gastric cancer, Sci. Signal. 7 (2014) ra38. [54] D.W. Chan, V.W. Liu, G.S. Tsao, K.M. Yao, T. Furukawa, K.K. Chan, et al., Loss of MKP3 mediated by oxidative stress enhances tumorigenicity and chemoresistance of ovarian cancer cells, Carcinogenesis 29 (2008) 1742–1750. [55] A.J. Barr, Protein tyrosine phosphatases as drug targets: strategies and challenges of inhibitor development, Future Med. Chem. 2 (2010) 1563–1576.