Farley et al. BMC Public Health (2017) 17:288 DOI 10.1186/s12889-017-4204-0
ERRATUM
Open Access
Erratum to: A mixed methods feasibility study of nicotine-assisted smoking reduction programmes delivered by community pharmacists – The RedPharm study Amanda Farley1, Sarah Tearne2, Taina Taskila3, Rachel H. Williams2, Susan MacAskill4, Jean-Francois Etter5 and Paul Aveyard2* Erratum Following publication of this article [1], it has come to our attention that the author, Susan MacAskill, has had her name captured incorrectly. The correct spelling is the aforementioned. Author details 1 Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, B15 2TT, Birmingham, UK. 2Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Primary Care Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK. 3Department of Family Care & Mental Health, Faculty of Education & Health, University of Greenwich, London, UK. 4Institute for Social Marketing, University of Stirling, Scotland FK9 4LA, UK. 5Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. Received: 15 March 2017 Accepted: 29 March 2017
Reference 1. Farley A, Tearne S, Taskila T, Williams R, Mackaskill S, Etter J. Aveyard P (2017) A mixed methods feasibility study of nicotine-assisted smoking reduction programmes delivered by community pharmacists–The RedPharm study. BMC Public Health. 2017;17:210. doi:10.1186/s12889-017-4116-z.
* Correspondence: [email protected] 2 Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Primary Care Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK © The Author(s). 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
ERRATUM
Open Access
Erratum to: A mixed methods feasibility study of nicotine-assisted smoking reduction programmes delivered by community pharmacists – The RedPharm study Amanda Farley1, Sarah Tearne2, Taina Taskila3, Rachel H. Williams2, Susan MacAskill4, Jean-Francois Etter5 and Paul Aveyard2* Erratum Following publication of this article [1], it has come to our attention that the author, Susan MacAskill, has had her name captured incorrectly. The correct spelling is the aforementioned. Author details 1 Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, B15 2TT, Birmingham, UK. 2Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Primary Care Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK. 3Department of Family Care & Mental Health, Faculty of Education & Health, University of Greenwich, London, UK. 4Institute for Social Marketing, University of Stirling, Scotland FK9 4LA, UK. 5Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. Received: 15 March 2017 Accepted: 29 March 2017
Reference 1. Farley A, Tearne S, Taskila T, Williams R, Mackaskill S, Etter J. Aveyard P (2017) A mixed methods feasibility study of nicotine-assisted smoking reduction programmes delivered by community pharmacists–The RedPharm study. BMC Public Health. 2017;17:210. doi:10.1186/s12889-017-4116-z.
* Correspondence: [email protected] 2 Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Primary Care Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK © The Author(s). 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
