Cador et al. Vet Res (2016) 47:95 DOI 10.1186/s13567-016-0382-5
Open Access
ERRATUM
Erratum to: Maternally‑derived antibodies do not prevent transmission of swine influenza A virus between pigs Charlie Cador1,4* , Séverine Hervé2,4, Mathieu Andraud1,4, Stéphane Gorin2,4, Frédéric Paboeuf3,4, Nicolas Barbier2,4, Stéphane Quéguiner2,4, Céline Deblanc2,4, Gaëlle Simon2,4 and Nicolas Rose1,4 Erratum to: Vet Res (2016) 47:86 DOI 10.1186/s13567‑016‑0365‑6 After publication of the original article [1], the authors noticed an error in Table 2 in the “Results” section. In the last column the R0 estimated values have been reversed
between groups. Consistently with the text, R0 is 5.8 [1.4–18.9] for MDA+ piglets (first row) and 14.8 [6.4– 27.1] for MDA− piglets (second row). The corrected version of Table 2 is included in this erratum.
Table 2 Estimation of the reproduction numbers R0 for MDA+ and MDA− piglets using the best model (model 2) Shedding period (days)
Direct transmission rate β (days−1)
6.1 [5.9 – 6.4]a
2.43 [1.09 – 4.23]a
MDA+ piglets MDA− piglets
Susceptibility factor σ
R0
0.39 [0.21–0.70]
5.8 [1.4–18.9]
–
14.8 [6.4–27.1]
a
Overall population estimate applying to both groups.
Author details 1 Swine Epidemiology and Welfare Research Unit, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), BP 53, 22440 Ploufragan, France. 2 Swine Virology Immunology Research Unit, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), BP 53, 22440 Ploufragan, France. 3 SPF Pig Production and Experimental Unit, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), BP 53, 22440 Ploufragan, France. 4 Université Bretagne Loire, Rennes, France.
Reference 1. Cador C, Hervé S, Andraud M, Gorin S, Paboeuf F, Barbier N, Quéguiner S, Deblanc C, Simon G, Rose N (2016) Maternally-derived antibodies do not prevent transmission of swine influenza A virus between pigs. Vet Res 47:86. doi:10.1186/s13567-016-0365-6
The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1186/s13567-016-0365-6.
Received: 14 September 2016 Accepted: 14 September 2016
*Correspondence: [email protected] 1 Swine Epidemiology and Welfare Research Unit, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), BP 53, 22440 Ploufragan, France Full list of author information is available at the end of the article © 2016 The Author(s). This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/ publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Open Access
ERRATUM
Erratum to: Maternally‑derived antibodies do not prevent transmission of swine influenza A virus between pigs Charlie Cador1,4* , Séverine Hervé2,4, Mathieu Andraud1,4, Stéphane Gorin2,4, Frédéric Paboeuf3,4, Nicolas Barbier2,4, Stéphane Quéguiner2,4, Céline Deblanc2,4, Gaëlle Simon2,4 and Nicolas Rose1,4 Erratum to: Vet Res (2016) 47:86 DOI 10.1186/s13567‑016‑0365‑6 After publication of the original article [1], the authors noticed an error in Table 2 in the “Results” section. In the last column the R0 estimated values have been reversed
between groups. Consistently with the text, R0 is 5.8 [1.4–18.9] for MDA+ piglets (first row) and 14.8 [6.4– 27.1] for MDA− piglets (second row). The corrected version of Table 2 is included in this erratum.
Table 2 Estimation of the reproduction numbers R0 for MDA+ and MDA− piglets using the best model (model 2) Shedding period (days)
Direct transmission rate β (days−1)
6.1 [5.9 – 6.4]a
2.43 [1.09 – 4.23]a
MDA+ piglets MDA− piglets
Susceptibility factor σ
R0
0.39 [0.21–0.70]
5.8 [1.4–18.9]
–
14.8 [6.4–27.1]
a
Overall population estimate applying to both groups.
Author details 1 Swine Epidemiology and Welfare Research Unit, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), BP 53, 22440 Ploufragan, France. 2 Swine Virology Immunology Research Unit, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), BP 53, 22440 Ploufragan, France. 3 SPF Pig Production and Experimental Unit, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), BP 53, 22440 Ploufragan, France. 4 Université Bretagne Loire, Rennes, France.
Reference 1. Cador C, Hervé S, Andraud M, Gorin S, Paboeuf F, Barbier N, Quéguiner S, Deblanc C, Simon G, Rose N (2016) Maternally-derived antibodies do not prevent transmission of swine influenza A virus between pigs. Vet Res 47:86. doi:10.1186/s13567-016-0365-6
The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1186/s13567-016-0365-6.
Received: 14 September 2016 Accepted: 14 September 2016
*Correspondence: [email protected] 1 Swine Epidemiology and Welfare Research Unit, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), BP 53, 22440 Ploufragan, France Full list of author information is available at the end of the article © 2016 The Author(s). This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/ publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
