Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 117.255.246.81 on 11/03/15 from IP address 117.255.246.81. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved

1321

Commentary

Europe 1992: Radiology Henri

Consequences

for European

Health

care and health

care organizations

national

affairs,

in Europe

have

but this may change

in the near future. National politics are being influenced by the unifying changes taking place within the European Economic Community (EC), or what is generally referred to as “Europe 1 992.” To what extent unification will influence health care and radiology is still uncertain but is worthy of consideration.

The European

Economic

Community

The EC was created by the Treaty of Rome in 1957 primarily as a “custom-union.” The founding member states, Belgium, West Germany, France, Italy, Luxembourg, and the

Netherlands,

were joined

the United

Kingdom.

Spain

Portugal

and

in 1974 by Denmark,

In 1 981 Greece joined,

EC to 325 million.

bringing

Ireland,

followed, the

total

and

and in 1986 citizenry

In 1983 and 1984, a number

responded

to the

concerns

of the

captains

of industry

by publishing a “white paper” by one of their commissioners, Lord Cockfield. The white paper suggested measures for achieving a single European economic market, with an absolute free exchange of persons, services, goods, and capital and with no restrictive national regulations. A schedule was

Received

January

25, 1990; accepted

after revision

June

drafted

with January

reprint

requests

AJR 155:1321-1325,

i990

0361 -803X/90/1

as the target

starting

trade

date for

within

the

member states, while maintaining national values and identifies under the structure of a European government. In the broadest terms, a united Europe will include: (1) economic integration based on stable relationships between the different currencies; (2) unification with respect to quality of life, environment, and education; and (3) maintenance of the national identities of the member states.

The Europe 1992 phenomenon is essentially economic. Leaders of the movement are guided by a determination to enhance Europe’s ability to compete with Japan and the United States. But with economic integration, a certain political integration will be necessary, and that will affect social systems in the member states.

Some

Legal

Aspects

The Court of Justice

of the European

Communities,

estab-

lished in Luxembourg, is the highest authority within the Community for interpretation of Community laws and their relationship to the national laws of the member states [1]. The Court has ruled that within each of the member states two legal systems simultaneously apply: first, the traditional system governed by the national constitution and the laws of the country and second, a separate Community system with an independent set of Community laws. The Community law

14, 1990.

to H. E. SchUtte.

December

1 , 1 993,

the European Common Market. The main goal of the EC is to facilitate

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Erasmus University and University Hospital Rotterdam-Dijkzigt,

Address

and

of the

of leading

businessmen from European multinational corporations (e.g., Dekker from Philips, Agnelli from Fiat) expressed concern for Europe’s future competitive trade status, in particular with Japan and the United States. In 1 985, the European Commis-

1

Care

E. SchUtte1

always been exclusively

sion

Health

556-1321

© American

Roentgen

Ray Society

Dr. Molewaterpl.

40, 301 5 GD Aotterdam,

The Netheriands.

1322

SCHUTTE

can be found in the Treaty of Rome (1 957) and in the legislation issued by the Community’s law-making bodies. Community law binds both citizens and member states and

Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 117.255.246.81 on 11/03/15 from IP address 117.255.246.81. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved

is implemented

in regulations

and directives.

A regulation

binds both the member state and the individual; it should be applied by all administrative authorities and courts in the member states, and its purpose is to create uniform law

throughout

the Community.

instructions

addressed

Directives

to every

are legally

member

state,

porated within a certain time in its national the function of a directive is standardization

binding

to be incor-

legislation. of laws.

Thus,

AJR:155,

provision

that

enables

insured

persons

December

of one

member

1990

state

to receive treatment in another member state provided that such treatment has been authorized by a competent national health care authority. The costs of treatment are at the

expense

of that authority,

yet expenditures

for care

vary

greatly between the member states (Table 1). On the other hand, private health insurance is regarded as an object of trade between the member states, as a service to which the free movement/free establishment policy applies. Because

almost 40% of the Dutch population Netherlands

is an attractive

market

is privately to foreign

insured,

health

the

insurers,

not only to insurance companies from the member states, but also via takeovers of established European insurance comEffects

on Health

Free Movement

Care

panies

of Persons

States.

One of the fundamental rights that the Treaty of Rome gives to all EC citizens is freedom to pursue their professional activity Specific

from Japan,

In most member

Switzerland,

and the United

states (except for Belgium

Germany), private health insurance fered than it is in the Netherlands, 2-7% of the population.

and West

is less competitively ofbeing purchased by only

in any of the 1 2 member states of the Community. directives concerning medical specialists and general

practitioners,

nurses responsible

pharmaceutical

chemists,

issued. These directives in another

member

services without state. In January of diplomas

and

for general dentists

have

not only establish

state,

but

also

Developments

care, midwives, already

been

permit

the

rendering

of

education

came

into

grounds

of nationality,

practice,

nor in fact. As for the immigrant

restrictions restrictions

neither

in law,

force.

Any

EC

nor in administrative

professional,

all

to their activities should be abolished if such are exclusively or principally to hinder the provi-

of services

by nonnational

Health

In 1 980,

egy was

actual establishment in another member 1989, a directive on the mutual recognition

of higher

The World

of Health

Policy

Organization

the right to practice

citizen who presents a proper diploma must be admitted to the profession. The member state should treat the traveling professional and the immigrant professional the same way as they treat their own citizens, without any discrimination on

sion

by companies

EC citizens.

the European

enunciated.

version

of the “health-for-all”

Subsequently,

in 1984,

strat-

38 regional

targets were adopted by the 32 member states of the European Region of the World Health Organization (EURO), including the 1 2 EC member states. The core objective is that by the year 2000 “health for all” must be under way, and the first of the 38 outcome targets (namely, “equity in health”) must be reached. The equity-in-health strategy of the World Health Organization [4] is to reduce differences in health

status

between

countries

and between

groups

within coun-

This pan-European policy was adopted outside the political, institutional, and legal framework of the EC and therefore lacks a clear legal and constitutional basis. But it hardly lacks political support of the member states and the Community at large. tries

by 25%.

Free Trade for Pharmaceuticals

The pricing of medical products and their inclusion in the scope of national insurance systems came under regulation in 1 989. On the basis of the provision

the European to control

for free trade

Court ruled that a national

the price

of pharmaceutical

products,

entiated between domestic and imported with one of the EC articles. The Court

intended that

Country

differ-

products conflicted acknowledged that

member states have the responsibility to combat that national price-restricting measures cannot discriminate against imported medicine.

Health

of goods,

measure,

TABLE 1: Costs of Health Care per Capita in Member States the European Community in 1986 vs Canada and the United States in 1985

inflation, but be used to

Care Eligibility

The social security objectives of the EC are limited to the coordination of existing national schemes, and as such do

Ireland Spain Portugal

not affect

Greece

legislation.

social specific

the content But

security situations

the

of the individual coordination

schemes may

national

of the

will be difficult, be inequitable.

almost

social

security

incomparable

and applications One

example

in

is the

Cost (U.S. dollars)

United States Canada France Germany The Netherlands Luxembourg Belgium Denmark Italy United

1710 1362 1039 1031 984 968 826 800 764

Kingdom

Note-Data

of

711

549 486 310 245 on European Community

Cooperation and Development Evens et al. [3].

[2J. Data

from the Organization on Canada

and United

for Economic States

from

December

AJR:155,

Professional

EUROPE

1990

the Union

Europ#{234}enne des M#{233}dicinsSp#{233}cialistes

Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 117.255.246.81 on 11/03/15 from IP address 117.255.246.81. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved

(UEMS) was founded as a private union of European specialists to defend the title of medical specialist

medical and the

specialist’s role in health care, to promote the quality of that care, to promote cooperation between national professional

organizations and solidarity between specialists, to promote the free exchange of medical specialists, and to defend their moral

and medical

interests.

EC in 1957, the UEMS Standing

Committee

1323

The AER, founded

Organizations

In 1956,

1992

With

became

the establishment

of the

an EC organization

and a

of Physicians,

the Comit#{233}Permanente

was established, in which all physicians of the EC member states are represented together with associate members from nonmember states as observers. The Comit#{233}Permanente is concerned with (1) promotion of the highest standard of medical training, practice, and health care within the EC; (2) promotion of free movement of medical specialists in the EC;

and (3) representation ofthe medical profession authorities of the EC.

to nonmedical

specialty

is recognized

represented in two thirds of the specialty that has been recognized

specialist

by the UEMS when it is 1 2 member

states.

Each

is represented in a monoof the UEMS, which studies the problems

section

raised by the Treaty of Rome qualifications, and the practice

date, 27 specialties

concerning definition, training of that particular specialty. To

have been recognized.

This achievement

should not be underestimated. In Italy, for instance, 148 medical specialties are proclaimed, which requires the UEMS to group these numerous subspecialties into fewer more broadly accepted categories.

Despite recognition of specialties, the basic curriculum of each has not yet been established. This has led to a commission

within

the

standardization

UEMS,

the

of training

main

function

programs

of which

is the

and determination

of

what good training programs should encompass. The EC also has been interested in medical training. A directive has created the Advisory Committee of Medical Training, an official body with equal representation from the responsible authority, the medical faculties, and the professional organization of each member state. The goal of this committee is to promote an

equal, high level of training and qualifications in the member states. Recently questionnaires were sent to organizations dealing with training programs in the member mine the status of these programs.

Consequences

states

to deter-

for Radiology

Professional organizations such as the European tion of Organizations for Medical Physics (EFOMP) European

Association

of

Radiology

(AER)

will

Federaand the

undoubtedly

attract the attention of the EC. The EFOMP, formed in 1 980, has surveyed the status of quality assurance among the 23 member countries in Europe

and informed 1988.

repre-

establishing and maintaining the highest educational standards. The unification of Europe undoubtedly has stimulated the AER to more activity. It organizes and sponsors

European

congresses

Society

and, with support

of North America

from the Radiological

and the European

try, now plans congresses instead of every 4 years,

on a permanent as in the past.

radiologic

indus-

site every 2 years, In 1 991 and 1993,

congresses will be held in Vienna, and to commemorate the 100th anniversary of Roentgen’s discovery, Berlin has been chosen as the site for 1995.

EC Directive

on Radiation

Protection

The (84/466/Euratom)directive [5] compelling the EC member states to establish fundamental measures for the protection of persons exposed to radiation for diagnostic or thera-

reasons

will have a direct

impact

in the near future.

The directive was issued in 1 984 along with some guidelines on how to improve radiation protection. Since then, each

of Specialties

A medical

federation

with

peutic Recognition

in 1 963, is an elected

senting all 28 radiology societies in Europe, including those in the 1 2 EC member states. The AER is especially concerned

the EC Commission

accordingly

in October

member state is adjusting its own directives. The EC directive addressed the following issues: (1) medical justification-the exposure of any person to ionizing radiation should be medically

justified

and

the

radiation

dose

should

subsequently

decrease to “as-low-as-reasonably-achievable” levels; (2) standards of qualification for persons who use radiation in health care; (3) protocols for quality assurance for radiographic

equipment;

radiographic physicist medicine.

(4) reduction

equipment;

when

equipment

European

Journals

Journal

publication

of the number

(5) availability

is used in radiotherapy

has not been directly

EC, but some international

of pieces

ofa competent

cooperation

of

medical

and nuclear

addressed

by the

may be desirable.

In

many European academic faculties, the journals in which publications appear and the number of citations these publications have received are used to measure the value of

research. Journals are rated by their “impact factor” [6]. As a consequence of emphasis on publication in high-impact journals, it is time to start working on one core European radiologic journal. There is no dominant large-circulation European journal (Table 2). Since 1987, the official journal of the Dutch Society has been the Journal of Medical Imaging. Stimulated by the Eu-

rope 1992 idea, I began, in my capacity

as chief editor of that

journal,

calling

of other

European

journals

explore

the opportunities

for possible

mergers.

Some

from

the letter

on the editors I received

from

Terry

Patton,

who

to

lines

is associated

with the British Journal of Radiology, reflect some nationalistic hesitancy. “In theory, I am sure that Europe could produce at

least one journal

comparable

to Radiology

or AJR and that

we (Europeans) are losing out because we are all trying to ‘go it alone.’ There are also people in U.K. who think that it is anomalous that we (UK) produce two journals (BJR and Clin

SCHUTTE

1324

TABLE

2: European

Radiology

Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 117.255.246.81 on 11/03/15 from IP address 117.255.246.81. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved

December

1990

Journals

Journal Acta Radiologica

AJR:155,

(founded

Society/

No. of

Affiliation

Members

Nordic

countries

British

Institute

No. of Full-

Cost

Subscriptions

2500

1500

1 800

3000

3300

1700

Belgian Society

900

Europe 1992: consequences for European health care and radiology.

Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 117.255.246.81 on 11/03/15 from IP address 117.255.246.81. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights rese...
895KB Sizes 0 Downloads 0 Views