Extracellular membrane vesicles secreted by mycoplasma Acholeplasma laidlawii PG8 are enriched in virulence proteins Vladislav M. Chernov, Alexey A. Mouzykantov, Natalia B. Baranova, Elena S. Medvedeva, Tatiana Yu. Grygorieva, Maxim V. Trushin, Innokentii E. Vishnyakov, Anton V. Sabantsev, Sergei N. Borchsenius, Olga A. Chernova PII: DOI: Reference:
S1874-3919(14)00381-9 doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2014.07.020 JPROT 1897
To appear in:
Journal of Proteomics
Received date: Revised date: Accepted date:
2 April 2014 18 June 2014 12 July 2014
Please cite this article as: Chernov Vladislav M., Mouzykantov Alexey A., Baranova Natalia B., Medvedeva Elena S., Grygorieva Tatiana Yu., Trushin Maxim V., Vishnyakov Innokentii E., Sabantsev Anton V., Borchsenius Sergei N., Chernova Olga A., Extracellular membrane vesicles secreted by mycoplasma Acholeplasma laidlawii PG8 are enriched in virulence proteins, Journal of Proteomics (2014), doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2014.07.020
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1
Extracellular membrane vesicles secreted by mycoplasma Acholeplasma laidlawii PG8 are enriched in virulence proteins
T
Vladislav M. Chernov1,2, Alexey A. Mouzykantov1, Natalia B. Baranova1,
RI P
Elena S. Medvedeva1, Tatiana Yu. Grygorieva1, Maxim V. Trushin1,2, Innokentii E.
1
SC
Vishnyakov3, Anton V. Sabantsev4, Sergei N. Borchsenius3, Olga A. Chernova1,2
Kazan Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Kazan Scientific Centre of
MA NU
the Russian Academy of Sciences, Kazan, Russia 2
Kazan (Volga region) Federal University, Kazan, Russia
3
Institute of Cytology, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia
4
Institute for Nanobiotechnologies, Saint Petersburg State Polytechnical
ED
University, St. Petersburg, Russia
PT
Abstract
Mycoplasmas (class Mollicutes), the smallest prokaryotes capable of self-
CE
replication, as well as Archaea, Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria constitutively produce extracellular vesicles (EVs). However, little is known
AC
regarding the content and functions of mycoplasma vesicles. Here, we present for the first time a proteomics-based characterisation of extracellular membrane vesicles from A. laidlawii PG8. The ubiquitous mycoplasma is widespread in nature, found in humans, animals and plants, and is the causative agent of phytomycoplasmoses and the predominant contaminant of cell cultures. Taking a proteomics approach using LC-ESI-MS/MS, we identified 97 proteins. Analysis of the identified proteins indicated that A. laidlawii-derived EVs are enriched in virulence proteins that may play critical roles in mycoplasma-induced pathogenesis. Our data will help to elucidate the functions of mycoplasma-derived EVs and to develop effective methods to control infections and contaminations of cell cultures by mycoplasmas.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 2
1. Introduction A. laidlawii (class Mollicutes) is a ubiquitous mycoplasma that is widespread
T
in nature, found in tissues from humans, animals and plants. A. laidlawii is the
RI P
causative agent of phytomycoplasmoses and the predominant contaminant of cell cultures [1, 2, 3]. Control of mycoplasma infections and contaminations presents a
SC
serious concern for the biotechnology, cell biology, health care service and agricultural sectors [4]. Solving this problem is considered to involve the
MA NU
investigation of adaptation of mycoplasma to stressful environmental conditions, the mechanisms of their survival in various polymicrobial communities and the realisation of their virulence [5]. Recently, it became apparent that a significant contributor to the aforementioned processes may be bacterial extracellular membrane vesicles [6, 7]. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) present the most important
ED
component of the bacterial secretome. Identified a few decades ago in Gramnegative bacteria, EVs were recently detected in Gram-positive bacteria [8],
PT
Archaea [9] and the simplest wall-less bacteria, mycoplasmas [10], and became an
CE
object of serious attention among researchers. It was found that extracellular membrane vesicles are composed of lipopolysaccharide, lipids, soluble or
AC
membrane-associated proteins, genetic materials and other factors associated with virulence [11]. EVs have been proposed to play diverse roles, including the transfer of a broad range of components, participation in cell-to-cell communication, pathogenesis and to present a new class of infects. The investigation of EVs is necessary to elucidate the mechanisms of the antagonistic relationship between bacteria and the microbial community, the interaction between microflora in higher eukaryotes and colonised cells and the development of a strategy to control pathogens [7, 12]. To perform the corresponding investigations, comprehensive characterisation of EVs is required that may include the application of a complex approach based on modern physicochemical and molecular methods, including post-genomics technologies. The results of proteomics-based characterisation of EVs in a range of bacteria have already been
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 3
documented in databases. However, data related to EVs derived from mycoplasmas are lacking. In this context, global proteomic profiling of extracellular membrane vesicles from A. laidlawii and identification of proteins
T
exported from mycoplasma cells via vesicular structures were the aims of this
RI P
study.
In the present study, global proteomic profiling of A. laidlawii PG8 EVs was
SC
performed for the first time. We identified a total of 97 proteins contained in bacterium-free EVs. Analysis of the identified proteins indicated that A. laidlawii-
MA NU
derived EVs are enriched in virulence proteins, which can play critical roles in mycoplasma-induced pathogenesis. We hope that this study opens the recently emerging field of mycoplasma EVs.
2. Materials and Methods
ED
2.1. Cell culture and purification of EVs A. laidlawii strain PG8, obtained from the N.F. Gamaleya Institute of
PT
Epidemiology and Microbiology (Moscow), was used in this study. The
CE
mycoplasma cells were cultured in liquid modified Edward’s medium (tryptose, 2% [w/v]; NaCl, 0.5% [w/v]; KCl, 0.13% [w/v]; Tris base, 0.3% [w/v]; horse
AC
serum, 10% [w/v]; yeast extract, 5% [w/v]; glucose solution, 1% [w/v]; benzylpenicillin [500,000 IE/mL], 0.2% [w/v]). Isolation of membrane vesicles from A. laidlawii PG8 cultures was performed according to Kolling and Matthews [13], with some modifications. The cells were precipitated via centrifugation at 5000 g for 20 min. The supernatant was filtered through a 0.10 µm filter (Sartorius Minisart, France), and the filtrate was concentrated 20-fold via ultrafiltration (Vivacell 100, 100,000 MWCO, Sartorius Stedim Biotech GmbH, Germany). Vesicles were collected via ultracentrifugation (100,000 g, 1 h, 8°C) using a MLA80 rotor (Beckman Coulter OptimaTM MAX-E), washed twice and resuspended in buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH = 7.4; 150 mM NaCl; 2 mM MgCl2). The suspension was placed on a stepwise density gradient (10% - 30% - 40% Optiprep in 50 mM Tris-HCl supplemented with 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.4). After centrifugation at
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 4
100,000 g for 3 h at 8°C, the fraction containing EVs was collected superiorly, diluted threefold in buffer and then centrifuged again. The pellet was resuspended in 50 mM Tris-HCl supplemented with 1mM PMSF (Fluka, Germany)". The
T
protein concentrations of the samples were measured via the Bradford method
RI P
using "Quick Start Bradford dye" (Bio-Rad). The isolation of vesicles from A. laidlawii PG8 cultures and the subsequent analyses were performed on 3 biological
SC
and 2 technical replicates.
MA NU
2.2. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyses TEM was performed according to the method of Cole [14]. The samples were fixed using 2.5% glutaraldehyde (Fluka, Germany) in 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (pH 7.2) for 2 h. The fixed samples were then dehydrated using an
ED
acetone, ethanol and propylene series prior to post-fixation in 0.1% OsO4 containing 25 mg/ml of saccharose. After treatment with epoxy resin (Serva,
PT
Switzerland), ultrathin sections were sliced using an LKB-III ultramicrotome
CE
(Sweden). The sections were stained with uranyl acetate for 10 min and lead citrate for 10 min. The stained samples were examined using a JEM-1200EX transmission
AC
electron microscope (Joel, Japan). To prepare samples for AFM analysis, aliquots of the A. laidlawii PG8 cells (1 mL) were centrifuged at 12000 rpm for 20 min at room temperature. The pellet was resuspended in 1 mL of PBS (pH 7.2). The prepared cells and EVs suspension were placed onto mica (Advanced Technologies Centre, Moscow, Russia) where the upper layer was removed. The cells were air-dried and washed twice with redistilled water. The samples were air-dried after each wash. AFM imaging was performed using a Solver P47H atomic force microscope (NT-MDT, Moscow, Russia) that was operated in the tapping mode using fpN11S cantilevers (r≤10 nm, Advanced Technologies Centre, Moscow, Russia). The height, the signal from the lock-in amplifier (Mag), the signal from the RMS detector (RMS), and the signal from the phase detector (phase) were set using
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 5
Nova 1.0.26 RC1 software (NT-MDT). The scan rate was 1Hz, and the image resolution was 512 × 512 pixels. SEM analyses were performed as described by Pich et al. [15]. For this
T
purpose, EVs from A. laidlawii PG8 were fixed using 1% glutaraldehyde for 1 h.
RI P
The samples were washed with 50 mM Tris-HCl, dried and sputter coated with 15 nm of gold/palladium using a Quorum Q150T ES coating system. The samples
SC
were observed using a Merlin Carl Zeiss scanning electron microscope.
MA NU
2.3. SDS-PAGE
Protein samples (7 µg) from membrane, cytoplasm and purified EVs were prepared as described previously [16] and analyzed via SDS-PAGE (12% resolving gel). The gel was subsequently stained with CBB R-250.
ED
2.4. In-solution digestion
Purified EVs (150 µg) were resolved using a digestion solution consisting of 9
PT
M urea and 40 mM ammonium bicarbonate in HPLC-grade water. Protein
CE
reduction was performed using 25 mM DTT for 1 h, followed by alkylation using 25 mM iodoacetamide in the dark for 45 min at room temperature. The samples
AC
were diluted (1:10) in 200 mM NH4HCO3 and digested in-solution using 5 ng/mL of trypsin Gold (Promega, USA) for 18 h at 37°C. The samples were desalted using ZipTipC18 (Millipore).
2.5. LC-ESI-MS/MS analysis and identification of proteins Analysis was performed using a TripleTOF 5600+ mass spectrometer with a NanoSpray III ion source (ABSciex, Canada) coupled with a NanoLC Ultra 2D+ nano-HPLC system (Eksigent, Dublin, CA). The HPLC system was configured in the trap-elute mode. For the sample loading buffer and buffer A, a mixture of 98.9% water, 1% methanol and 0.1% formic acid (v/v) was used. Buffer B was 99.9% acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid (v/v). Aliquots of 70 µg protein were used for MS/MS analysis. The samples were loaded on a Chrom XP C18 trap column
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 6
(Eksigent) at a flow rate of 3 μl/min for 10 min and eluted through the 3C18-CL120 separation column (Eksigent) at a flow rate of 300 nl/min. The gradient was from 5 to 40% of buffer B over 120 min. The column and the precolumn were
T
regenerated between runs by washing with 95% buffer B for 7 min and
RI P
equilibrated using 5% buffer B for 25 min.
The information-dependent mass spectrometry (MS) experiments included 1
SC
survey MS1 scan followed by 50 dependent MS2 scans. The MS1 acquisition parameters were as follows: the mass range for analysis and subsequent ion
MA NU
selection for MS2 analysis was 300-1250 m/z, and the signal accumulation time was 250 ms. The ions were selected for MS2 analysis based on their intensity using a threshold of 400 cps and a charge state from 2 to 5. The MS2 acquisition parameters were as follows: the resolution of the quadrupole was set as UNIT (0.7 Da), the mass range was 200-1800 m/z, the focus of the ion beam was optimised to
ED
attain maximal sensitivity, and the signal accumulation time was 50 ms for each parent ion. Collision-activated dissociation was performed using nitrogen gas and a
PT
collision energy ramping from 25 to 55 V within the 50 ms signal accumulation
CE
time. The analysed parent ions were sent to the dynamic exclusion list for 15 sec in order to obtain an MS2 spectra at the chromatographic peak apex (the minimum
AC
peak width throughout the gradient was approximately 30 sec). The MS/MS spectra were searched using MASCOT software (Matrix Science, Inc.),
the
genomic
data
(http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/)
of and
A. the
laidlawii
PG-8A
decoy
sequence
from
NCBInr
database.
The
exponentially modified protein abundance index (emPAI) was generated using MASCOT software [17].
2.6. Subcellular localisation and function of the identified proteins The subcellular locations of the proteins were analysed using the Psortb v3.0.2 database [18]. The functions of each protein were categorised according to the clusters of orthologous groups of proteins (COG) method [19].
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 7
2.7. Western blot analysis Proteins from EVs and whole cell lysates were separated via 12% SDS-PAGE and transferred to Hybond C nitrocellulose (GE Healthcare, USA) as described
T
previously [20]. The membrane was blocked using 3% skim milk in PBS for 30
RI P
min. The antibodies against Hsp20 were diluted 1:1000. Recombinant A. laidlawii PG8 Hsp20 protein and the Hsp20 antibodies were obtained as described
SC
previously [20].
The secondary antibodies (goat anti-rabbit antibodies conjugated with
MA NU
horseradish peroxidase, Sigma, USA) were diluted 1:10,000. The membrane was incubated in primary and secondary antibodies for 1 h, and after each step, the membrane was carefully washed with PBS. The membranes were stained with DAB (Sigma, USA). Lysates from M. gallisepticum A5969B cells were used as a
ED
negative control.
2.8. Immuno-electron microscopy
PT
A. laidlawii cells and EVs were fixed using formaldehyde and glutaraldehyde
CE
at final concentrations of 2% and 0.2%, respectively. The cells and the EVs were fixed at room temperature for 12 h and were collected via centrifugation (10,000 g
AC
for 10 min and 100,000 g for 1 h, respectively). The pellet was dehydrated using increasing concentrations of ethanol and embedded in LR-White resin (Polyscience,
Inc.,
USA).
LR-White
was
polymerised
at
50°C.
Immunocytochemistry was performed on ultrathin sections according to a standard protocol [20]. Hsp20-specific antibodies were used at 1:50 dilutions in PBS supplemented with 0.1% BSA. To visualise the distribution of the Hsp20 protein, goat anti-rabbit antibodies conjugated to 15-nm colloid gold particles (EY Laboratories, Inc., USA) were used. The sections were stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate and examined using a JEM-100U electron microscope. Sections incubated in the absence of the polyclonal antibodies or incubated in rabbit preimmune serum served as negative controls.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 8
3. Results 3.1. Production of EVs from A. laidlawii We were the first to demonstrate that mycoplasma A. laidlawii PG8 naturally
T
produces EVs during in vitro culture [10]. When thin sections of A. laidlawii PG8
RI P
cells (log phase) cultured in Edward medium were analysed via TEM, EVs were apparent on the surface of the mycoplasma (Fig. 1A). Moreover, secreted EVs
SC
were observed in the surrounding milieu based on TEM and AFM analyses (Fig. 1A, B, F, G). Similar to native OMVs from Gram-negative bacteria and EVs from
MA NU
Gram-positive bacteria, EVs from A. laidlawii PG8 are spherical, bilayered, and closed membranous structures. The diameter of the mycoplasma EVs ranged from 70 to 120 nm; single vesicles whole diameter less than 70 nm and more than 120 nm were also revealed (about 5%). To obtain EVs for this study, we purified EVs from A. laidlawii PG8 as described previously [10] with some modifications
ED
(additional washing steps and density gradient ultracentrifugation using OptiPrep). Typically, we obtained 700-800 µg (wet weight) of EVs from 1 L of A. laidlawii
PT
PG8 culture broth. TEM, AFM and SEM analyses revealed that purified EVs were
CE
closed vesicular bodies, and no membrane whorls or cell fragments were detected (Fig. 1, C-E, H-J). The size of the purified EVs was similar to that of OMVs and
AC
MVs from Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, respectively [8, 21], and was consistent with our previous data [10]. SDS-PAGE analysis revealed that A. laidlawii EVs contain distinct protein patterns compared to other subcellular locations (Fig. 2), suggesting that sorting mechanisms similar to those of Gramnegative bacterial OMVs and Gram-positive bacterial EVs are involved in the production of EVs [8, 21, 22].
3.2. Proteomic analysis of A. laidlawii-derived EVs We performed proteomic analysis of purified A. laidlawii-derived EVs using LC-ESI-MS/MS and identified a total of 97 vesicular proteins, which are listed in Table 1. Information regarding the protein properties and detailed peptide data corresponding to the identified proteins are presented in Table S1. DnaK,
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 9
triosephosphate isomerase, phosphoglycerate kinase, heat shock protein Hsp20, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, purine-nucleoside phosphorylase and enolase were the most abundant vesicular proteins. Fig. 3A contains a
T
representative peptide mass fingerprinting spectrum of Hsp20. We further verified
RI P
the presence of this protein in EVs via Western blot using a rabbit anti-Hsp20 antibody (Fig. 3B). The recombinant protein Hsp20 (19.65 kDa) is comprised of
SC
the full-length native Hsp20 sequence (15.2 kDa) fused in frame with the translated region (4 kDa) of pET-15b plasmid vector, which contains the "histidine tail" (for
MA NU
extraction from the cell lysate by affinity chromatography) [20]. Immuno-gold labelling of EVs using a goat anti-rabbit antibody also revealed positive staining (Fig. 3C).
The identified proteins were classified into four groups, as shown in Fig. 4, based on their localisation in the bacteria: cytoplasm (73), membrane (5),
ED
extracellular region (2) and unknown localisation (17). Many cytoplasmic proteins (53) were found in the A. laidlawii-derived EVs, most of which were metabolic or
PT
ribosomal proteins. The functions of the 97 vesicular proteins identified in EVs
CE
were categorised according to the COG method [19]. The vesicular proteins from A. laidlawii are involved in translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis (22),
AC
transcription (3), replication, recombination and repair (2), defense mechanisms (1), cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis (1), intracellular trafficking, secretion and vesicular transport (1), posttranslational modification, protein turnover and chaperones (6), energy production and conversion (12), carbohydrate transport and metabolism (19), amino acid transport and metabolism (6), nucleotide transport and metabolism (3), inorganic ion transport and metabolism (1) and secondary metabolite biosynthesis, transport and catabolism (2), while the functions of 18 proteins are poorly characterised or unknown (Fig. 4). A. laidlawii-derived EVs contained 37 proteins associated with bacterial virulence (Table 1). The virulence factors include enzymes participating in the degradation of proteins and peptides (4), nucleic acids (2) and polysaccharides (6), adhesins (3) and some others (22)
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 10
that may play pathological roles for plants, animals and humans when infected by mycoplasma.
T
4. Discussion
RI P
Taking a proteomics approach using LC-ESI-MS/MS, we have documented for the first time the proteins in EVs secreted by A. laidlawii PG8 mycoplasma
SC
cells (Table 1). We identified 97 proteins, representing 7% of the theoretical A. laidlawii PG8 proteome (1380 proteins). Protein identification was considered to
MA NU
be significant when two or more unique peptides were detected (pepscore ≥ 6). According to the data from the literature, the number of proteins secreted as contents
of
extracellular
membrane
vesicles
varies
among
different
microorganisms in a range of ~3-24% of the corresponding theoretical proteome, but this percentage does not exceed 8% among the majority of microbes [8, 21, 22,
ED
24]. To verify the obtained data, we performed Western blot analysis (Fig. 3B) as well as immuno-electron microscopy (Fig. 3C) to detect heat shock protein Hsp20
PT
in mycoplasma-free EVs. Hsp20 is a chaperone that participates in polypeptide
CE
folding and maintenance of cytoplasmic membrane integrity under stressful conditions [25, 26]. Previously, this protein of A. laidlawii was found to be
AC
localised to the cytoplasm, as well as plasma membrane and the extracellular space, based on immuno-electron microscopy [20]. The obtained data (Table 1, Fig. 3) demonstrated that Hsp20 protein is located on the membrane as well as inside of A. laidlawii EVs, and its abundance is greater than that of other proteins (Mol% = 7.24), which may indicate an important role of this protein in vesicles and/or target cells. The identified proteins of A. laidlawii EVs were classified according to Psortb. Based on this classification, the number of membrane proteins in mycoplasma EVs is significantly less than the number of cytoplasmic proteins. It is known that the predicted protein localisation according to this approach is not always correct, and falsehoods are possible when using this classification method [27]. According to the data reported by Serebryakova et al. [28], in which 17
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 11
acylated and 192 membrane-associated proteins of A. laidlawii were identified, the number of membrane proteins identified in mycoplasma-derived EVs may reach 19 (19.6%). Nevertheless, the obtained results indicate the predominance of
T
cytoplasmic proteins in A. laidlawii EVs. Similar results were also obtained for
RI P
vesicles from some other bacteria [8, 21, 22] and microvesicles from mammals [23]. These results may highlight the sorting membrane and cytoplasmic proteins
in each corresponding situation.
SC
in EVs derived from corresponding organisms and indicate their principal function
MA NU
According to the COG classification method (Fig 4B), a majority of the identified proteins are involved in fundamental cell processes in A. laidlawii. In fact, some identified cytoplasmic proteins participating in fundamental cell processes, such as elongation factors EF-Tu and EF-G, chaperones GroEL and DnaK, subunits of DNA-dependent RNA-polymerase and ribosomal proteins, are
ED
also detected in EVs from many other microorganisms [8, 21, 22, 24], including both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria (Fig. 5). This finding might
PT
indicate their particular role in the bacterial population as proteins exported via
CE
EVs. Clarification of their roles, as well the mechanisms of polypeptide sorting, remains to be elucidated.
AC
Many proteins (41%) detected in A. laidlawii EVs were previously identified in our studies [5] as stress-responsive mycoplasma proteins (Fig. 6). Significant modulation in the expression of these proteins in A. laidlawii cells occurred when these bacteria were cultivated under stressful conditions. Moreover, a significant increase in the vesiculation level was detected in A. laidlawii PG8 cultures. The alteration of the expression levels of RpoB, TufB, EF-G, IF-2, ProRS, GlyRS, GlyA, GAPDH, PdhA, PdhB, AckA, PepF and β-lac in A. laidlawii PG8 cells and the significant increase in the vesiculation level of the mycoplasma under stressful conditions may be interrelated processes. Similar data were also reported regarding a variety of bacteria [29, 30]. These data indicate that essential processes of bacterial adaptation to stressors may be mediated by proteins contained in EVs.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 12
We identified 37 proteins in A. laidlawii EVs that are considered as factors of bacterial virulence (Table 1). The relative abundance of these proteins (Mol%) was 59.5%. Moreover, 45.5% correspond to enolase, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate triosephosphate
isomerase,
phosphoglyceromutase,
T
dehydrogenase,
RI P
phosphoglycerate kinase (catalyse reactions of glycolysis), heat shock protein Hsp20, molecular chaperone DnaK (participate in protein folding) and translation
SC
elongation factor EF-Ts (participates in protein synthesis). It is suggested that enolase and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase may facilitate the
MA NU
adhesion of vesicles to various surfaces [31]. The identified vesicular proteins of A. laidlawii that are associated with bacterial virulence may be involved in cell-tocell communication and pathogenesis.
Previously, it was reported in our studies [3, 10] that EVs from A. laidlawii PG8 exhibit infectious characteristics with respect to virulence and
ED
may contribute to the phytopathogenicity of this mycoplasma. A. laidlawii EVs penetrate plants via the root system faster than the mycoplasma cells – 20 min after
PT
growth in medium containing A. laidlawii PG8 - while the mycoplasma cells are
CE
detected in plants only after 7-8 days [3]. Metalloproteases detected within A. laidlawii-derived EVs might contribute to the invasion of vesicles and/or cells
AC
via the cell wall of plants. The participation of metalloproteases in the invasion of phytopathogens was reported [32]. However, the role of these enzymes contained in bacterial EVs in phytopathogenesis remains to be explored. A. laidlawii-derived
EVs
were
demonstrated
to
contain
enzymes
participating in the degradation of proteins and peptides (aminopeptidase T, peptidase M3, oligoendopeptidase F, Zn-dependent protease and others), nucleic acids (polyribonucleotide nucleotidyltransferase and
metallo-beta-lactamase
superfamily protein) and polysaccharides (pullulanase, glycogen phosphorylase and α-amylase) that may act on the corresponding structures of target cells. Some of the vesicular proteins of A. laidlawii PG8, such as enolase, glyceraldehyde-3phosphate dehydrogenase and the surface-linked protein containing a VWFA domain, may act as adhesins [33]. Moreover, the surface-linked protein containing
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 13
a VWFA domain might be involved in the pathology of the hemostasis system routinely observed in patients suffering from persistent bacterial infections [34]. The presence of polyribonucleotide nucleotidyltransferase (PNPase),
T
considered to function as a global regulator of bacterial virulence [35], in
RI P
A. laidlawii EVs is of particular interest. It was demonstrated that bacterial PNPase may display RNase or DNase activity depending on the environmental conditions
SC
[36]. Because bacterial DNases may induce chromosomal mutations in eukaryotic cells [37], the clastogenic effect of A. laidlawii PG8 EVs, reported previously in
MA NU
our works [10], might be associated with this enzyme. The difficulty in suppressing mycoplasma infections and contaminations is well recognised [1]. The mechanisms by which mycoplasma rapidly adapt to antibacterial drugs are unclear. In our studies, we demonstrated the participation of EVs
from
A. laidlawii PG8
in
the
resistance
of
the
mycoplasma
to
ED
fluoroquinolones [38]. We revealed that A. laidlawii PG8 EVs mediate the efflux of ciprofloxacin and the export of the nucleotide sequence of an antibiotic target
PT
gene (parC) that contains a mutation in the QRDR locus. Recently, it was reported
CE
that Staphylococcus aureus EVs may participate in the transport of biologically active β-lactamase to confer bacterial resistance to antibiotics in microbial
AC
communities [39]. The authors demonstrated that S. aureus released β-lactamase protein via extracellular vesicles, and the release of these EVs enabled other ampicillin-susceptible Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria to survive in the presence of ampicillin. These results indicate that bacterial EVs might play an important role in intercellular communication to mediate the survival of microorganisms in bacterial communities. In the context of intercellular communication and the development of resistance to antibacterial drugs in microbial communities, the protein of the metallo-β-lactamase family identified in A. laidlawii EVs is of particular interest. Because Mollicutes lack a cell wall, that is target of β-lactam antibiotics, the corresponding enzyme of A. laidlawii PG8 may function to protect not the mycoplasma, but other bacteria in the polymicrobial environment that are important for its survival. In this context,
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 14
investigation of the proteins transported by vesicles from mycoplasma and other bacteria in microbial communities may be of particular interest with respect to the regulation of pathogens. However, whether A. laidlawii-derived EVs transport
RI P
T
biologically active enzymes remains to be elucidated.
Conclusion
SC
We were the first to demonstrate that mycoplasmas naturally produce EVs. As a result of this study, by characterising and establishing the first proteome of A.
MA NU
laidlawii-derived EVs, we found that many properties of vesicles are consistent between bacteria containing a rigid wall (Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria) and wall-less bacteria (Mollicutes). Growing evidence suggests that EVs produced by bacterial cells play diverse roles, including symbiosis and pathogenesis, in polymicrobial communities [40, 41]. Our results also indicate that
ED
many mycoplasma vesicular proteins identified in this study are likely involved in the adaptation of bacteria to stressors, survival in microbial communities and
PT
pathogen-host interactions. These findings suggest that the secretion of EVs is an
CE
evolutionally conserved, universal process that occurs in organisms from the simplest wall-less bacteria to complex organisms. It was revealed in this study that
AC
A. laidlawii-derived EVs are enriched in virulence proteins, which may play critical roles in mycoplasma-induced pathogenesis. These results indicate the necessity of developing new approaches to examine the smallest prokaryotes and to control infects. We hope that this study will stimulate further investigations, including proteomic studies, on mycoplasma EVs to elucidate their biogenesis, properties and functions to understand how very small cells function and to develop effective methods to suppress pathogens that are associated with socially significant infections in humans, animals and plants, as well as the contamination of cell cultures and vaccines.
Acknowledgments
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 15
This work was supported by a grants from the Russian Foundation for Basic Research 12-04-01052a and 13-04-02070, a Grant from the President of the Russian Federation MK-3823.2013.4 and a Grant from a state supporting leading
T
scientific schools of the Russian Federation (no. NSH-825.2012.4). The authors are
RI P
grateful to V.V. Salnikov and G.F. Shaimardanova from the Kazan Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics KSC RAS for their assistance with TEM, Y.N. Osin
SC
from Kazan (Volga region) Federal University for his assistance with SEM and I.A. Altukhov and S.I. Kovalchuk from the Research Institute for Physical
MA NU
Chemical Medicine of the Ministry of Public Health of the Russian Federation for their technical assistance with proteomics research. This work was funded by the subsidy of the Russian Government to support the Program of Competitive Growth
AC
CE
PT
ED
of Kazan Federal University among World`s Leading Academic Centers.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 16
References [1]
Windsor, H. M., Windsor, G. D., Noordergraaf, J. H., The growth and
long term survival of Acholeplasma laidlawii in media products used in Scripal, I. G., in: Bilay, V. I. (Eds). Microorganisms — agents of the
plant diseases, Naukova Dumka, Kiev 1988.
Chernov, V. M., Chernova, O. A., Mouzykantov, A. A., Baranova, N.
SC
[3]
RI P
[2]
T
biopharmaceutical manufacturing. Biologicals 2010, 38, 204–210.
B. et al., Extracellular membrane vesicles and phytopathogenicity of Acholeplasma
[4]
MA NU
laidlawii PG8. ScientificWorldJournal 2012, Article ID 315474, 6 pages. Volokhov, D. V., Graham, L. J., Brorson, K. A., Chizhikov, V. E.,
Mycoplasma testing of cell substrates and biologics: Review of alternative nonmicrobiological techniques. Mol Cell Probes 2011, 25, 6977. [5]
Chernov, V. M., Chernova, O. A., Medvedeva, E. S., Mouzykantov,
ED
A. A. et al., Unadapted and adapted to starvation Acholeplasma laidlawii cells
PT
induce different responses of Oryza sativa, as determined by proteome analysis. J Proteomics 2011, 74, 2920–2936. Schertzer, J. W., Whiteley, M., Bacterial outer membrane vesicles in
CE
[6]
trafficking, communication and the host-pathogen interaction. J Mol. Microbiol.
AC
Biotechnol. 2013, 23, 118130. [7]
Interspecies
Tashiro, Y., Yawata, Y., Toyofuku, M., Uchiyama, H., Nomura, N., interaction
between
Pseudomonas
aeruginosa
and
other
microorganisms. Microbes Environ. 2013, 28, 1324. [8]
Lee, E. Y., Choi, D. Y., Kim, D. K., Kim, J. W. et al., Gram-positive
bacteria produce membrane vesicles: proteomics-based characterization of Staphylococcus aureus-derived membrane vesicles.
Proteomics 2009, 9,
54255436. [9]
Prangishvili, D., Holz, I., Stieger, E., Nickell, S. et al., Sulfolobicins,
specific proteinaceous toxins produced by strains of the extremely thermophilic archaeal genus Sulfolobus. J Bacteriol. 2000, 182, 29852988.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 17
[10]
Chernov, V. M., Chernova, O. A., Mouzykantov, A. A., Efimova, I.R.
et al., Extracellular vesicles derived from Acholeplasma laidlawii PG8. ScientificWorldJournal 2011, 11, 11201130. Kulp, A., Kuehn, M. J., Biological functions and biogenesis of
T
[11]
RI P
secreted bacterial outer membrane vesicles. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 64, 163184.
Amano, A., Takeuchi, H., Furuta, N., Outer membrane vesicles
SC
[12]
function as offensive weapons in host-parasite interactions. Microbes Infect. 2010,
[13]
MA NU
12, 791798.
Kolling, G. L., Matthews, K. R., Export of virulence genes and shiga
toxin by membrane vesicles of Escherichia coli O157:H7. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999, 65, 1843-1848. [14]
Cole, R. M., in: Razin, Sh., Tully, J. G. (Eds.), Methods in
Pich, O. Q., Burgos, R., Ferrer-Navarro, M., Querol, E., Piñol, J., Role
PT
[15]
ED
mycoplasmology, Academic Press, New York 1983, p. 1.
of Mycoplasma genitalium MG218 and MG317 cytoskeletal proteins in terminal
3188-98.
Archer, D. B., Rodwell, A. W., Rodwell, E. S., The nature and
AC
[16]
CE
organelle organization, gliding motility and cytadherence. Microbiology 2008, 154,
location of Acholeplasma laidlawii membrane proteins investigated by twodimensional gel electrophoresis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1978, 513, 268283. [17]
Ishihama, Y., Oda, Y., Tabata, T., Sato, T. et al., Exponentially
modified protein abundance index (emPAI) for estimation of absolute protein amount in proteomics by the number of sequenced peptides per protein. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2005, 4, 1265–1272. [18]
Yu, N. Y., Wagner, J. R., Laird, M. R., Melli, G. et al., PSORTb 3.0:
Improved protein subcellular localization prediction with refined localization subcategories and predictive capabilities for all prokaryotes. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 16081615.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 18
[19]
Tatusov, R. L., Galperin, M. Y., Natale, D. A., Koonin, E. V., The
COG database: a tool for genome-scale analysis of protein functions and evolution. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 3336. Vishnyakov, I. E., Levitskii, S. A., Manuvera, V. A., Lazarev, V. N. et
T
[20]
RI P
al., The identification and characterization of IbpA, a novel α-crystallin-type heat shock protein from mycoplasma. Cell Stress Chaperones 2012, 17, 171180. Lee, E. Y., Bang, J. Y., Park, G. W., Choi, D. S. et al., Global
SC
[21]
proteomic profiling of native outer membrane vesicles derived from Escherichia
[22]
MA NU
coli. Proteomics 2007, 7, 31433153.
Rivera, J., Cordero, R. J., Nakouzi, A.S., Frases, S. et al., Bacillus
anthracis produces membrane-derived vesicles containing biologically active toxins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 1900219007. Aoki, N., Jin-no, S., Nakagawa, Y., Asai, N. et al., Identification and
ED
[23]
characterization of microvesicles secreted by 3T3-L1 adipocytes: redox- and
PT
hormone-dependent induction of milk fat globule-epidermal growth factor 8associated microvesicles. Endocrinology 2007, 148, 38503862. Choi, D. S., Kim, D. K., Choi, S. J., Lee, J. et al., Proteomic analysis
CE
[24]
of outer membrane vesicles derived from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proteomics
AC
2011, 11, 34243429. [25]
Tsvetkova, N. M., Horváth, I., Török, Z., Wolkers, W. F. et al., Small
heat-shock proteins regulate membrane lipid polymorphism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 1350413509. [26]
Horwitz, J., Alpha-crystallin can function as a molecular chaperone.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1992, 89, 1044910453. [27]
Gardy, J. L., Brinkman, F. S., Methods for predicting bacterial protein
subcellular localization. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2006, 4, 74151. [28]
Serebryakova, M. V., Demina, I. A., Galyamina, M. A., Kondratov, I.
G. et al., The acylation state of surface lipoproteins of mollicute Acholeplasma laidlawii. J Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 2276922776.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 19
[29]
Maredia, R., Devineni, N., Lentz, P., Dallo, S.F. et al., Vesiculation
from Pseudomonas aeruginosa under SOS. ScientificWorldJournal 2012, Article ID 402919, 18 pages. Ellis, T. N., Kuehn, M. J., Virulence and immunomodulatory roles of
T
[30]
[31]
RI P
bacterial outer membrane vesicles. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2010, 74, 8194. Toledo, A., Coleman, J. L., Kuhlow, C. J., Crowley, J. T., Benach, J.
SC
L., The enolase of Borrelia burgdorferi is a plasminogen receptor released in outer membrane vesicles. Infect. Immun. 2012, 80, 359368. Valueva, T. A., Mosolov, V. V., Rol ingibitorov proteoliticheskih
MA NU
[32]
fermentov v zashite rasteniy. Uspekhi Biologicheskoi Khimmii 2002, 42, 193-216. [33]
Dumke, R., Hausner, M., Jacobs, E., Role of Mycoplasma pneumoniae
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) in mediating interactions
[34]
ED
with the human extracellular matrix. Microbiology 2011, 157, 23282338. Bjerketorp, J., Nilsson, M., Ljungh, A., Flock, J. I. et al., A novel von
PT
Willebrand factor binding protein expressed by Staphylococcus aureus. Microbiology 2002, 148, 2037-2044. Clements, M. O., Eriksson, S., Thompson, A., Lucchini, S. et al.,
CE
[35]
Polynucleotide phosphorylase is a global regulator of virulence and persistency in
AC
Salmonella enterica. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 25, 8784–8789. [36]
Cardenas, P. P., Carzaniga, T., Zangrossi, S., Briani, F. et al.,
Polynucleotide phosphorylase exonuclease and polymerase activities on singlestranded DNA ends are modulated by RecN, SsbA and RecA proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, 9250–9261. [37]
Stoilov, L., Gecheff, K., Restriction endonucleases as a tool for in
vivo induction of chromosomal and DNA damage in barley genome. in: Shu, Q.Y. (Eds.), Induced Plant Mutations in the Genomics Era. FAO, Rome, 2009 pp. 20912. [38]
Medvedeva, E. S., Baranova, N. B., Mouzykantov, A. A., Grigorieva,
T. Yu. et al., Adaptation of mycoplasmas to antimicrobial agents: Acholeplasma laidlawii extracellular vesicles mediate the export of ciprofloxacin and a mutant
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 20
gene related to the antibiotic target. ScientificWorldJournal 2014, Article ID 150615, 7 pages. [39]
Lee, J., Lee, E. Y., Kim, S. H., Kim, D. K. et al., Staphylococcus
T
aureus extracellular vesicles carry biologically active β-lactamase. Antimicrob.
[40]
RI P
Agents Chemother. 2013, 57, 25892595.
Manning, A. J., Kuehn, M. J., Functional advantages conferred by
SC
extracellular prokaryotic membrane vesicles. J Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 23, 131141.
Deatherage, B. L., Cookson, B. T., Membrane vesicle release in
MA NU
[41]
bacteria, eukaryotes, and archaea: a conserved yet underappreciated aspect of
AC
CE
PT
ED
microbial life. Infect. Immun. 2012, 80, 19481957.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
MA NU
SC
RI P
T
21
Figure 1. TEM (A-E), AFM (F-H) and SEM (I, J) of cells and EVs from A.
AC
CE
PT
ED
laidlawii PG8. EVs of mycoplasma are indicated using arrows. Bar = 200 nm.
Figure 2. SDS-PAGE of proteins derived from the membrane (1), the cytoplasm (2), and EVs (3). Molecular weight standards are indicated on the left (kDa).
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
ED
MA NU
SC
RI P
T
22
Figure 3. Identification of the Hsp20 protein via mass-spectrometry (A) and
CE
verification of this result via Western blot (B) and immuno-electron microscopy (C). Bar = 50 nm. B. Electrophoresis gel image of proteins from A. laidlawii PG8
AC
lysates (2) and EVs (3) and M. gallisepticum A5969 lysates (negative control) (4). Lane 1 – recombinant A. laidlawii PG8 Hsp20 protein (that is comprised of the full-length native Hsp20 sequence fused in frame with the translated region of pET-15b plasmid vector [20]). Molecular weight standards are indicated on the left (kDa).
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ED
MA NU
SC
RI P
T
23
Figure 4. Distribution of the A .laidlawii PG8 vesicular proteins according to
AC
CE
PT
their intracellular localisation (A) and function based on the COG method (B).
Figure 5. Venn diagram of vesicular proteins from A. laidlawii PG8, Grampositive (A) and Gram-negative (B) bacteria [8, 20, 21, 23]. Each protein is indicated by its term in the UniProt database.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ED
MA NU
SC
RI P
T
24
PT
Figure 6. Venn diagram of the vesicular (I) and stress-responsive (II) proteins
AC
CE
of A. laidlawii PG8. Each protein is indicated by its term in the UniProt database.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Graphical Abstract
A. laidlawii PG8 (the ubiquitous mycoplasma that is widespread in nature, found in humans, animals and plants, and is the causative agent of phytomycoplasmoses and the predominant contaminant of cell cultures) was proved to produce extracellular vesicles (EVs). A.
PT
laidlawii-derived EVs are enriched in virulence proteins that may play critical roles in
AC C
EP T
ED
MA
NU
SC
RI
mycoplasma-induced pathogenesis.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 25
Table 1. List of proteins identified in A. laidlawii-derived EVs №
Protein
1 2 3 4 5 6
acetate kinase bifunctional aldehyde/alcohol dehydrogenase dihydrolipoamide acetyltransferase dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase F-type H+-transporting ATPase subunit alpha F-type H+-transporting ATPase subunit beta
A9NFI4 A9NEM3 A9NHS5 A9NHS4 A9NGW4 A9NGW2
ackA ACL_0496 ACL_0177 pdhC ACL_1310 pdhD ACL_1309 atpA ACL_0984 atpD ACL_0982
7
A9NGU7
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Na+-transporting NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase subunit C pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 component subunit alpha pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 component subunit beta pyruvate formate lyase V-type H+-transporting ATPase subunit A V-type H+-transporting ATPase subunit A ABC transporter substrat-binding component aminopeptidase T M3 peptidase family oligoendopeptidase oligoendopeptidase F oligoendopeptidase F peptidase M20B, peptidase T 2-deoxyribose-5-phosphate aldolase purine-nucleoside phosphorylase thymidine phosphorylase 6-phosphofructokinase 6-phosphofructokinase ABC transporter ligand-binding protein
25 26 27 28 29
0.45 1.58 0.75 0.38 0.06 0.66
0.57 1.98 0.94 0.48 0.08 0.83
72180
0.36
0.45
A9NHS7
pdhA ACL_1312
Cytoplasm
40737
0.48
0.60
A9NHS6
pdhB ACL_1311
Cytoplasm
35551
0.43
0.54
A9NE91 A9NGV3 A9NHD8 A9NHJ2 A9NET3 A9NG69 A9NHF0 A9NEG5 A9NGX8 A9NG35 A9NG34 A9NG19 A9NH72 A9NH71 A9NFZ7
pfl ACL_0028 ntpA1 ACL_0973 ntpA2 ACL_1169 ACL_1223 ampS ACL_0237 ACL_0733 pepB2 ACL_1181 ACL_0119 ACL_0998 deoC ACL_0699 deoD ACL_0698 deoA ACL_0683 pfk2 ACL_1092 pfk1 ACL_1091 ACL_0661
84590 65734 65088 87552 46150 69002 67000 65502 45348 23649 25967 46320 45496 33973 48385
0.46 0.1 0.05 0.94 0.51 0.15 0.47 0.22 0.15 0.48 6.74 0.23 1.16 0.2 0.14
0.58 0.13 0.06 1.18 0.64 0.19 0.59 0.28 0.19 0.60 8.47 0.29 1.46 0.25 0.18
ABC transporter substrate-binding protein alpha amylase alpha-amylase alpha-amylase enolase
A9NE41 A9NFD8 A9NFZ3 A9NG03 A9NF93
ACL_1410 ACL_0448 amyA3 ACL_0657 amyA1 ACL_0667 eno ACL_0402
54532 57462 71051 58510 46386
0.6 0.12 0.09 0.12 6.82
0.75 0.15 0.11 0.15 8.57
30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39
glucose-6-phosphate isomerase glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase glycogen phosphorylase ketose bisphosphate aldolase, class-II phosphoglycerate kinase phosphoglyceromutase phosphopentomutase pullulanase, surface-anchored protein pyruvate kinase transketolase
A9NHX0 A9NHE5 A9NFL6 A9NE26 A9NHH8 A9NF91 A9NG16 A9NG01 A9NH70 A9NEC3
pgi ACL_1358 gap ACL_1176 glgP ACL_0528 ACL_1395 pgk ACL_1209 gpmI ACL_0400 deoB ACL_0680 ACL_0665 pyk ACL_1090 tktA ACL_0062
47793 35539 91733 30279 42636 55704 44374 110331 49156 71328
0.49 6.08 0.82 2.13 4.55 2.53 0.54 0.06 2.21 0.25
0.62 7.64 1.03 2.68 5.72 3.18 0.68 0.08 2.78 0.31
40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47
triosephosphate isomerase (TIM) 30S ribosomal protein S1 30S ribosomal protein S2 30S ribosomal protein S3 30S ribosomal protein S5 30S ribosomal protein S6 arginyl-tRNA synthetase asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase
A9NHH5 A9NGK8 A9NHC6 A9NED9 A9NEF0 A9NEN9 A9NFH4 A9NE58
tpiA ACL_1206 rpsA ACL_0875 rpsB ACL_1157 rpsC ACL_0093 rpsE ACL_0104 rpsF ACL_0193 argS ACL_0485 asnS ACL_1427
Cytoplasm Cytoplasm Cytoplasm Unknown Cytoplasm Cytoplasm Cytoplasm Cytoplasm Cytoplasm Cytoplasm Cytoplasm Cytoplasm Cytoplasm Cytoplasm Cytoplasmic Membrane Unknown Cytoplasm Cytoplasm Unknown Cytoplasm Secreted. Cell surface. Cytoplasm Cytoplasm Cytoplasm Unknown Cytoplasm Cytoplasm Cytoplasm Unknown Cytoplasm Cytoplasmic Membrane Cytoplasm Cytoplasm Cytoplasm Cytoplasm Cytoplasm Cytoplasm Cytoplasm Cytoplasm
27672 53971 38292 28629 17594 10652 64134 53257
4.48 0.34 0.18 0.25 1.01 0.74 0.1 0.13
5.63 0.43 0.23 0.31 1.27 0.93 0.13 0.16
RI P
SC
MA NU
ED
PT
CE
AC
9
Gene name
T
42802 94978 57130 48908 55362 50328
nqrC ACL_0967
Location in bacteria Cytoplasm Cytoplasm Cytoplasm Cytoplasm Cytoplasm Cytoplasmic Membrane Unknown
8
UniProt
MW
emPAI Mol %
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 26
0.28 1.66 0.85 0.45 0.25 0.18 0.40 0.24 0.49 0.08 2.84 0.19 0.40 0.16 0.11 0.36 0.08 0.10 1.06 0.09 0.13 1.77 2.36 4.75 0.67 7.24 0.10 0.92 0.43 0.34 0.21 0.49 0.13
ACL_0309 ACL_0991 ACL_0992 ACL_0449
Cytoplasm Cytoplasm Unknown Unknown
62199 47765 50107 54151
0.23 0.59 0.37 0.13
0.29 0.74 0.46 0.16
A9NET4 A9NEV2 A9NG99 A9NF22
ACL_0238 ACL_0256 ACL_0763 secA ACL_0330
21163 61188 36389 93653
0.34 0.05 0.09 0.15
0.43 0.06 0.11 0.19
A9NFS6
hsdM1 ACL_0589
56702
0.12
0.15
90 91 92 93 94
type I site-specific restriction-modification system, M (modification) subunit hypothetical protein ACL_0210 hypothetical protein ACL_0662 hypothetical protein ACL_0672 hypothetical protein ACL_1034 hypothetical protein ACL_1409
Cytoplasm Cytoplasm Cytoplasm Cytoplasmic Membrane Cytoplasm
A9NEQ6 A9NFZ8 A9NG08 A9NH14 A9NE40
ACL_0210 ACL_0662 ACL_0672 ACL_1034 ACL_1409
120075 54346 35210 65395 97874
0.11 0.6 0.31 0.22 0.26
0.14 0.75 0.39 0.28 0.33
95 96 97
hypothetical protein ACL_0116 glycoside hydrolase family protein hypothetical protein ACL_1407
A9NEG2 A9NHG4 A9NE38
ACL_0116 ACL_1195 ACL_1407
Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Cytoplasmic Membrane Unknown Unknown Unknown
18251 71479 44832
0.41 0.05 0.07
0.52 0.06 0.09
85 86 87 88 89
aspS ACL_0823 fusA ACL_0187 tuf ACL_0188 glnS ACL_1352 glyS ACL_0946 hisS ACL_0824 ileS ACL_0702 leuS ACL_0242 pnp ACL_0808 proS ACL_0296 tsf ACL_1156 infB ACL_0320 tyrS ACL_1185 gltX ACL_0139 thrS ACL_0354 rpoA ACL_0114 rpoC ACL_0172 nusA ACL_0317 ACL_0872 gyrA ACL_0007 galU ACL_0839 groEL ACL_1247 tig ACL_0535 dnaK ACL_0550 grpE ACL_0549 ibpA ACL_0421 lon ACL_0536 sodA ACL_0302 pduL ACL_0013 fabG1 ACL_0463 ACL_1103 ACL_0387 ACL_0209
A9NF01 A9NGX1 A9NGX2 A9NFD9
SC
MA NU
ED
PT
CE
RI P
A9NGF7 A9NEN3 A9NEN4 A9NHW4 A9NGS6 A9NGF8 A9NG38 A9NET8 A9NGE2 A9NEY8 A9NHC5 A9NF12 A9NHF4 A9NEI5 A9NF46 A9NEG0 A9NEL8 A9NF09 A9NGK5 A9NE70 A9NGH3 A9NHL6 A9NFM3 A9NFN8 A9NFN7 A9NFB2 A9NFM4 A9NEZ4 A9NE76 A9NFF2 A9NH83 A9NF79 A9NEQ5
T
Cytoplasm 65145 0.22 Cytoplasm 76204 1.32 Cytoplasm 42720 0.68 Cytoplasm 62748 0.36 Cytoplasm 53018 0.2 Cytoplasm 48039 0.14 Cytoplasm 103401 0.32 Cytoplasm 92679 0.19 Cytoplasm 78536 0.39 Cytoplasm 54122 0.06 Cytoplasm 31974 2.26 Cytoplasm 67403 0.15 Cytoplasm 46296 0.32 Cytoplasm 51565 0.13 Cytoplasm 75244 0.09 Cytoplasm 36891 0.29 Cytoplasm 155490 0.06 Cytoplasm 40350 0.08 Cytoplasm 9684 0.84 Cytoplasm 97411 0.07 Cytoplasm 31872 0.1 Cytoplasm 58136 1.41 Cytoplasm 48135 1.88 Cytoplasm 65552 3.78 Cytoplasm 21883 0.53 Unknown 15923 5.76 Cytoplasm 86562 0.08 Extracellular 22710 0.73 Cytoplasm 21181 0.34 Cytoplasm 26166 0.27 Cytoplasm 60166 0.17 Unknown 38560 0.39 Cytoplasm 34092 0.1
81 82 83 84
aspartyl-tRNA synthetase elongation factor G elongation factor Tu glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase glycyl-tRNA synthetase, class II histidyl-tRNA synthetase isoleucine amino-acyl tRNA synthetase leucyl-tRNA synthetase polyribonucleotide nucleotidyltransferase prolyl-tRNA synthetase translation elongation factor EF-Ts translation initiation factor IF-2 tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase glutamyl-tRNA synthetase threonyl-tRNA synthetase DNA-directed RNA polymerase subunit alpha DNA-directed RNA polymerase subunit beta' transcription termination factor DNA binding protein DNA gyrase subunit A UDP glucose pyrophosphorylase chaperonin GroEL FKBP-type peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase molecular chaperone DnaK molecular chaperone GrpE molecular chaperone, heat shock protein Hsp20 serine protease Lon, ATP-dependent Fe/Mn family superoxide dismutase propanediol utilization protein beta-ketoacyl-(acyl carrier protein) reductase ABC transporter ATPase hypothetical protein ACL_0387 metal-dependent phosphohydrolase, HD domain-containing protein metallo-beta-lactamase superfamily protein putative Zn-dependent protease putative Zn-dependent protease surface-anchored VWFA domain-containing protein NAD(P)H-dependent FMN reductase glycerone kinase meso-diaminopimelate dehydrogenase preprotein translocase subunit SecA
AC
48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80