Fibronectin
fragments
secretion
stimulate
by human
Donald
H.
Laboratory
necrosis
factor
monocytes
Beezhold
and
of Macrophage
tumor
Christine
Biology,
Personius
Guthrie
Research
Institute,
Abstract: Fibronectin (Fn) is a high molecular-weight glycoprotein that can influence many aspects of monocyte function. The purpose of this study was to determine whether Fn could stimulate monocyte tumor necrosis factor (TNF) secretion. Monocytes were isolated from the peripheral blood of healthy volunteers by density gradient centrifugation and adherence to plastic (2 h). Plasma Fn was purified from the blood by gelatinSepharose affinity chromatography. Monocytes were stimulated with Fn for 18 h and the supernatants were assayed for TNF activity using the L929 bioassay. Intact Fn stimulated the secretion of TNF in a dose-dependent manner. Intact Fn-induced TNF secretion by monocytes was inhibited (50%) but not eliminated by the addition of the R-G-D-containing peptide GRGDSP. Limited proteolysis of the Fn molecule using insoluble chymotrypsin resulted in a fragment preparation that was dramatically more stimulatory than the intact Fn preparation. Highperformance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) purification of the fragments demonstrated that at least two fragments were capable of stimulating TNF secretion. Further purification by affinity chromatography and HPLC localized the stimulatory activity to the 120-kd cellbinding fragment. The possibility that the stimulatory activity was the result of endotoxin contamination was ruled out using macrophages from C3H/Hej mice. These results suggest that Fn fragments are potentially important molecules for activation of monocytes and may stimulate monocyte cytotoxic activity.J. Leukoc. Biol. 51: 59-64; 1992.
Sayre,
for
lymph
the
lymph
Pennsylvania
node cells [22]. It was further demonstrated node cell proliferative response was Fn and macrophage dependent and that the were T lymphocytes [22]. recently, it has been shown that monocytes, and B lymphocytes express at least two
pendent ing cells More phocytes,
that dose derespondT lymintegrins
that function as Fn receptors, VLA-4 [12, 37] and VLA-S [24]. Fn-dependent proliferation of highly purified T cells is dependent on costimulation of the cells with anti-CD3 antibody and Fn [24, 33]. In light of these observations, it is postulated that the mitogenic activity of Fn in lymph node cell cultures involves costimulation of the T cells by Fn and macnophages. The exact nature of the involement of macrophages in this response remains to be determined. Monocyte/macrophages function as accessory cells by antigen processing and presentation. In addition, macrophages modulate the activity of other cell types by the secretion of several cytokines. We have previously shown that Fn can induce rat penitoneal macrophages to secrete intenleukin 1 (IL-i) [1]. We have now extended those studies to include the stimulation of TNF secretion by human monocytes, and we have localized the stimulatory activity to the cell-binding fragment of Fn. Thus, it may be hypothesized that Fn fragments are important mediators in host defense and function by the recruitment of monocytes and by activating the cells for increased effector cell function.
MATERIALS
AND
METHODS
Reagents Key
Words:
monocytes
jibronectin
tumor
necrosis
factor
Hepanin
and
gelatin-Sepharose 4B were purchased from (Piscataway, NJ). Chymotrypsin-agarose, polymyxin B, and Ficoll-Hypaque (Histopaque) were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). The synthetic peptides GRGDSP and GRADSP were purchased from Telios (San Diego, CA) and the anti-Fn antibody was purchased from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA). Pharmacia
INTRODUCTION Fibronectin
(Fn)
that
has
been
and
tissue
and
stimulate
injury,
sis
not
found
in
have of
We tory mixed
the
have activity
mitogens,
lymphocyte
collagen,
sensitive found including
metastatic
that
These for
dovanDNA,
tumor
various Fn
36]. fluids
as
a nonspecific
blood
Stimulation
of Monocytes
drawn
from
healthy
(10
U/mi)
and
hepanin
volunteers the
was
collected blood
peripheral
of
Fn fnagand at
Fn,
Abbreviations:
HPLC,
high-performance
lipopolysaccharide;
cells.
that Fn has immunomodulafound to inhibit the allogeneic [20] and nonspecific lymphocyte mitogens [2i}. In the absence
functioned
Venous
and
to pnoteoly-
to have activities stimulation [27,
Purification into
phosphate-buffered
shown Fn was response
to however,
fibnin,
is extremely
by
previously [20-23].
reactivity
molecule
of functional domains. by their binding affinity
[161 and chemotaxis identified in inflammatory
destruction
transformation
immune
is a complex
of Fn have been intact molecule,
been
tissue
Fn
of inflammation
sites
modulate
Fn
including
[30].
proliferation
ments sites
cells
glycoprotein at
it may repair.
molecules
fragments
fibnobiast
accumulate
by a series identified
been
and
and
high-molecular-weight
where
biological
hepanin,
a to
wound
is characterized mains have ous
is
shown
mitogen
sodium sis
dodecyl
HBSS,
Hanks’
chromatography; PBMC, peripheral blood saline; PEC, peritoneal exudate
sulfate-polyacrylamide
balanced
salt
solution;
!L-i , interleukin I ; LPS, mononuclear cell; PBS, macrophage; SDS-PAGE,
liquid
gel electrophoresis;
TNF,
tumor
necro-
factor. Reprint
of
fibronectin;
ogy,
requests:
Guthrie
Received
Journal
Donald
Research
March
of Leukocyte
H.
Institute,
26,
1991
Beezhold,
Laboratory
PA
Sayre, ; accepted
Biology
April
Volume
of Macrophage
Biol-
18840. 26,
1991.
51,
January
1992
59
mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated by centrifugation over Ficoll-Hypaque (i000g, 20 mm). The PBMCs were washed three times with Hanks’ balanced salt solution (HBSS) and resuspended in endotoxin-free RPMI 1640 (Cellgro; Mediatech, Herndon, VA) containing 100 U/mi penicillin, 100 jg/ml streptomycin, 20 mM HEPES, and 10% fetal bovine serum. One milliliter of the cell suspension (2 x 106/well) was plated into 24-well tissue culture plates (Linbro; Flow Laboratories, McLean, VA) and allowed to adhere for 2 h at 37#{176}C.Nonadherent cells were removed by vigorous washing three times with HBSS. The remaining ad-
against PBS, and protein concentrations optical density at 280 nm using an 1.28 mg/ml [26].
herent cells (2 x i05) were 93-95% monocytes as determined by Giemsa staining and the phagocytosis of latex beads (1 jim; Dow Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN). The monocytes were stimulated with Fn or Fn fragments in serum-free RPMI for i8 h, after which the supernatants were collected, centrifuged (iO,000g, 4 mm) and assayed for
extent of fragmentation sulfate-polyacrylamide
tumor
necrosis
Peritoneal
factor
(TNF)
activity.
Macrophages
Mice of the C3H/Hej (endotoxin-resistant) and C3H/Ouj ( endotoxin-sensitive) strains were purchased from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME). Periotoneal exudate macrophages (PECs) were recovered from the mice 3 days after intraperitoneal injection of i.0 ml of a sterile 10% solution of thioglycoliate broth (Difco, Detroit, MI) as previously described [2]. The exudate cells were plated at 1 x i06/ml and allowed to adhere for i h before vigorous washing to remove
nonadherent
cells.
Fibronectin
Proteolysis
Fibronectin
fragments
procedure with insoluble equivalent zyme
10%
of Fibronectin
Fibronectin was purified from plasma by gelatin-Sepharose chromatography as previously described [22]. In brief, human plasma was batch incubated with gelatin-Sepharose for 2 h at room temperature. The slurry was poured into a column and washed extensively with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), ph 7.4, followed by 0.1 M urea in S mM Tris-HC1 buffer, pH 7.5. Fn was eiuted with 4 M urea in the same Tris buffer and dialyzed against PBS containing 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 tg/ml streptomycin, and 0.1 zg/ml polymyxin B. The Fn was concentrated by negative pressure dialysis
60 55
5 units
removed
gel.
The
stimulating
produced
by
by
chymotrypsin
per
centrifugation
(l2,000g,
fragments
were
or
mg
tested
further
purified
by of
a modification
et al. [26]. Fn (chymotrypsin-agarose)
was determined gel electrophoresis
activity
determined coefficient
was of
of
incubated at
Fn.
The
an en-
2 mm) by sodium (SDS-PAGE)
and the dodecyl on a directly for TNF by affinity chro-
matography.
For heparin-Sepharose affinity chromatography, the fragments were first dialyzed against 25 mM Tris buffer, pH 7.5, and then batch incubated with heparin-Sepharose for i h. The fragments were eluted in two fractions in the same Tris buffer
containing
tion
200
was
again subjected and the gelatin-binding collected, dialyzed concentrated. The
phy
tions and
mM
NaCl
and
column column.
cyte
fragment
stimulation
treated
with contaminating
lized man In ther phy
iM
NaCl.
Each
frac-
to gelatin-Sepharose chromatograand non-gelatin-binding fracagainst PBS containing antibiotics, 120-kd cell-binding fragment was
found to elute from the heparin yet failed to bind to the gelatin
any
Purification
of was
were
of Pierschbacher chymotrypsin
the
were extinction
assays,
Detoxi-Gel
all
(Pierce, lipopolysaccharide through a 0.2-jim
with 200 mM NaC1, Before use in monopreparations
were
Rockford, IL) to eliminate (LPS) and filter steripore filter (Acrodisc, Gel-
by passage Sciences). some experiments, the fragment preparations were furfractionated by high-performance liquid chromatogra(HPLC) on a GF-2S0 zirconia-stabilized silica gel filtration column (Du Pont). The mobile phase was PBS at pH 7.4 and the flow rate was 1.0 mi/mm. Following sample injection and an 8-mm wait, the fragments were collected in 0.5-mi or 0.25-mi fractions and analyzed for TNF stimulatory activity using
human
were
identified
sis
as
previously
peripheral
in the HPLC described
blood monocytes. Fn fractions by western [35].
fragments blot analy-
lb
Ia
I
50
45 40 35
30
30
25
20
20 15
10
10 5 a
Con
10
1.0 Fn
(ug/ml)
R-G-D
(ug/ml)
Fig. 1. Stimulation ofTNF secretion by intact plasma fibronectin. (a) Dose response ofadherence-purified monocytes to Fn. The monocytes were stimulated with gelatin-Sepharose-purified plasma Fn for 18 h in serum-free medium and the supernatant levels of TNF determined by the L929 bioassay. The data are representative of six different Fn preparations. (b) Inhibition of Fn-induced TNF secretion by R-G-D peptide. Adherence-purified human monocytes were stimulated with plasma FN (100 zg/ml). The R-G-D-containing peptide GRGDSP was added 30 mm prior to the addition of Fn and the supernatants were collected after 18 h incubation. The peptide inhibited Fn-induced TNF secretion in a dose-dependent manner. No inhibition was observed with the control
60
peptide.
Journal
of Leukocyte
Biology
Volume
51,
January
1992
Tumor
Necrosis
The L929
Factor
biological fibroblast
[3].
Units
activity of TNF was tested using cytotoxicity assay [11] as previously
of
interim
activity
were
recombinant
tional
determined
TNF
Biological
the
as
to
from
distributed
Program,
the
by
National
MD. Units of activity calculated using Parlin
murine described
comparison
obtained
Board
Modifiers
tute, Frederick, intervals were
by
standard
Standards
Response
logical
MW
Bioassay
0
5
10
30
60
25 the
Na-
the
Bio-
Cancer
FN
12
Insti-
9
and 95% confidence software [17].
6 RESULTS Fibronectin Intact
Stimulation
Fn
was
the
tants.
TNF
relatively
needed
high
to
induce
serum-free and
by
an
inhibit
to demonstrate neutralize
R-G-D
sequence
binding TNF
in Figure
inhibited
in
been
function
of
system,
Fn-induced
the
TNF
In
3. SDS-PAGE
Fibronectin reducing
cell-
staining. above
to
the
after
secretion
in
a dose-
response.
As
a
first
molecule
step
in
was
fragmented
con
Fn
by Fn Fragments
determining
the
by
active
sites
limited
the
labeled
the
level
of
the
production
addition
on
proteins
with
lane
Figure
fragmentation
of
polyacrylamide
visualized
chymotrypsin Fn
by chymotrypsin.
a 10%
by
(in
represents
minutes)
induced
Blue
is
untreated
fragmentation
gel
Coomassie
indicated
monomeric
by
Fn,
chymotrypsin
im-
of chymotrypsin.
ability
to
in
Fn,
proteolysis
the
the
the
indicated
times.
compared
to
the
Fn
TNF
and
with
insoluble
chymotrypsin-agarose
removed
by
centrifugation at of the samples prior to the addition
TNF-inducing
intact
the
enzyme.
Fn
activity
Fn This
in
these
In
was
analysis that an increased experiments, Fn
results
insoluble
enzyme
between
by kinetic
molecule
secretion.
incubated
insoluble
sampled approach
preparations
eliminates
[2,
23]
or
the
in the
varia-
of proteolysis. The extent of fragmentation was analyzed by SDSPAGE (Fig. 3). Although a large number of fragments are produced, accumulation of a i20-kd fragment is observed over
using
induce
batch
was
2 demonstrates the
was
bility
Secretion
treatment
chymotrypsin.
of
of TNF
and
The
0 represents
fragment
electrophoresed
peptide
R-G-D-contain-
dependent manner. The control peptide GRADSP had no effect on Fn-induced TNF secretion (data not shown). However, complete inhibition could not be obtained using the peptide GRGDSP, suggesting that different active sites on the molecule or multiple Fn receptors are involved in this
Stimulation
of
lane.
mediately
order
of Fn
were
conditons
Time each
and
analysis
fragments
under
pep-
shown
Fn.
Fig.
we attempted
using
ib,
the small
have
secretion
in
control in this to bind to many
known
in our
are
cultured
Furthermore,
and
Fn
can
be seen
dependent,
10 tg/ml)
contained
[31).
Fn-induced
As
peptide
is
sequence
for
dose
than
as a negative
molecule the
Fn
by human Fn stimusuperna-
Monocytes Fn
specificity
GRGDSP.
was
(greater
served
R-G-D
the
specifically
ing
secretion.
ofthe
containing
to
TNF alone
of
region
tides
of Fn
experiments.
way
binding
secretion
doses
medium
subsequent
cells
4
found
Fn-induced
but
Monocytes
to induce cytokine secretion As can be seen in Figure la, plasma secretion ofTNF activity in the monocyte
monocytes.
lated
of Human
rate
time.
30 25 2O C
15
: Li
5.
5
0
10
Chymotrypsin (in Fig.
2.
Kinetics
Plasma
Fn
Sigma)
and
of Fn
was
treated
ments
for
assay.
Cells
representative
with
sampled
stopped by removal was then determined 18 h and were of
fragment
at
insoluble
the
of the by
production
enzyme incubating
supernatant stimulated three
different
with TNF
at
times.
50
levels
fragment
1
2
3
4
treatment.
enzymatic
were
assayed or
preparations.
Fn
digestion
Stimulatory with the with fragments.
the
5
6
7
Fraction
(chymotrypsin-agarose, The
Fn
0
chymotrypsin
centrifugation. human monocytes
g/ml
60
mm)
by
chymotrypsin
indicated
30 digestion
was activity Fn frag-
Fig.
4.
Monocyte
ments.
Chymotryptic
GF-250
gel
L929
bio-
TNF-inducing
Data
are
of
TNF
three
Beezhold
TNF
filtration activity
and
column. in the activity
fragment
Personius
of The
Fn
(1
by
observed.
HPLC-separated
mg/mI)
fractions
monocyte are
91011121314
number
induced
fragments
stimulatory
different
secretion
8
(10
were l)
stimulation The
were assay.
data
Fn
fractionated then Two
are
fragon
tested major
representative
a for
peaks of
preparations.
Fibronectin-induced
TNF
secretion
61
b
a
MW
C
Western
blot
several
analysis
bands
of peak
including
lower-molecular-weight
TNF-lnducing
Activity
6-8
(fraction
the
i20-kd
bands
(Fig.
7) demonstrated
fragment
and
several
5).
Is Not Endotoxin
Contamination
The possibility of endotoxin contamination must counted for in all experiments that examine cytokine tion. Therefore, we have examined the stimulatory of
Fn
fragments
using
were
performed
described The
was
using
in relation
tions.
fragment
fraction that addition,
fractions
to
the
used
as
(200 contains the the fragments
further
following
As
gesting
starting
discriminate
the
Fig.
5.
Western
chymotryptic l20-kd
blot digest
of Fn.
cell-binding
contains
HPLC
of Fn
Lane
fragment.
multiple
represents
analysis
a represents Lane
fragments
HPLC
fraction
Purification
fragments
in
HPLC
HPLC
b represents
including
fractions
fraction HPLC
the
3, which fraction
l20-kd
of the
not
is the 7,
fragment.
c
10.
activation
the
response
a requirement
for
macrophages
which
Lane
macrophage
augment
from
to
the
However,
Fn-induced
C3H/Ouj
Fn fragments in GRGDSP completely had no effect (Fig.
(perhaps Fn.
TNF
mice
the presence eliminated 7).
material
were
peaks
of
ac-
from both cells secrete shift in response the result of colfractions during C3H/Ouj cells C3H/Hej, sug-
can
that
may
as
modifica-
mM NaCl), gelatini20-kd cell-binding were collected in
be seen in Figure 6, macrophages C3H/Hej and the endotoxin-sensitive C3H/Ouj TNF in response to HPLC fraction 5. The to fraction 5 from fractions 2-3 (Fig. 5) was lecting 0.25-mi fractions instead of 0.5-mi the HPLC purification. Interestingly, the respond more strongly to Fn than cells from tivity.
experiments fragments
4 with
preparation
from
These
HPLC-purified
heparin-binding
In
0.25-mi
macrophages
mice.
to Figure
a low-affinity
nonbinding fragment.
peritoneal
C3H/Hej
endotoxin-insensitive
be acsecreactivity
by
endotoxin)
LPS
is
clearly
secretion.
When
stimulated
with
of synthetic the response and
the
peptides, GRADSP
of Fn Fragments DISCUSSION
Chymotrypsin treatment of Fn results in the production of a large number of proteolytic fragments. To isolate the stimulator)’ regions of the Fn molecule, the fragments were separated by HPLC gel filtration chromatography and tested for TNF stimulatory activity. As can be seen in Figure 4, two peaks of TNF stimulatory activity were observed. Western blot analysis (Fig. 5) of the first peak (fraction 3) reveals that the major fragment present is the i20-kd fragment of Fn. This fragment comigrates with the 120-kd cell-binding fragment purchased from Calbiochem (data not shown).
In
this
of
a
study
new
we confirm
biological
and
function
extend
our
of
stimulation
Fn:
previous
finding of
[1]
cytokine
secretion. In this study we have shown that purified plasma Fn is capable of stimulating TNF release from adherencepurified human monocytes. The cytokine-inducing activity of the intact molecule was partially blocked by GRGDSP
600
500 400 400 (1) 4-’
C
300
300
E (1) 4-,
LL
z
C
200
I-
100
0
2
1
3
4
HPLC 00
1
2
Fig.
6. Fn-induced
TNF
tion.
Macrophages
from
3
4
HPLC
Fraction
secretion
is not
both
C3H/Hej
line) mice secrete TNF in response The C3H/Hej macrophages failed up to 10 /g/ml (data not shown).
62
Journal
5
of Leukocyte
6
(dashed
Biology
8
9
10
by endotoxin line)
fraction to LPS
Volume
Fig.
7.
Inhibition
of
Fn
fragment-induced
thetic peptide. Data were obtained stimulated with 10 zl of HPLC-purified
number caused
to HPLC to respond
7
and
contaminaC3H/Ouj
thetic
(solid
5 of the Fn fragments. when stimulated with
51
,
January
1992
tion
peptides ofthe
Fn
(50 zg/ml) fragments.
5
were No
6
Fraction
added inhibition
TNF using
7
secretion
macrophages
from
Fn fragments
(solid
to the ofFn
8
9
by
R-G-D
10
Number
assay
30 mm
fragment-induced
C3H/Ouj
line). prior
synmice
The
syn-
to the
addi-
TNF
secre-
tion was observed when the control synthetic peptide GRADSP (dashed line) was added. However, the Fn inhibitor synthetic peptide GRGDSP (dotted line) completely inhibited this response.
and was dramatically augmented of the Fn. HPLC purification demonstrated that TNF-inducing least
two
i20-kd i20-kd
ofthe
Fn,
proteolytic
fragment. fragment
[26].
Chymotryptic that contains
by chymotryptic digestion of the chymotryptic fragments activity is located on at of Fn, one of which is a digestion of Fn produces a the central cell-binding region
Unlike
fragments
that
of
the
cell-binding
the
synthetic GRGDSP. Several observations
tory
activity
intact
fragment
in
our
isolated
and
was
in
activity eliminated
that
with
to
buffers polymyxin
the
by
stimulato conwe have taken rigorous precautions to in our Fn preparations. Our Fn is due
endotoxin-free
absorbed
TNF-inducing
completely
demonstrate
preparations
taminating LPS. First, reduce LPS contamination was
the
was
Fn
TNF
and
not
containing
antibiotics
B-Sepharose
before
use
in
our assays. Second, using affinity chromatography and HPLC we have localized Fn stimulatory activity to a fraction containing the i20-kd fragment. It is unlikely that LPS would coelute with this fragment and be inhibited by the GRGDSP peptide, which is known to block Fn binding to VLA-5. Finally, macrophages from endotoxin-insensitive mice (C3H/Hej) respond to the same HPLC fraction (fraction 5) of the Fn fragments. What is not known, however, is whether
LPS
serves
as
an
important
costimulator
in
our
as-
says. The fact that the cells from C3H/Ouj mice respond more strongly than C3H/Hej cells argues that LPS may enhance the response. In support ofthis, it has been shown that LPS enhances monocyte adherence to fibronectin [29]. Experiments are in progress to address this possibility. Monocytes are known to have at least two Fn receptors, VLA-4 and VLA-5 [4, 10], and are reported to interact with T cell Fn by way of a fucose receptor [13]. The mechanism by
which
Fn
stimulates
monocytes
to
secrete
TNF
is
not
known
but is likely to involve multiple interactions. Many including monocytes use Fn as a substrate adhesion molecule, yet it is now clear that interaction with Fn also alters the physiological activity of the cell. Monocytes have
cells
clearly
been
ments.
shown
Soluble
phages
to Fn
[i4,iS],
[25,
28]. Fn monocytes
macrophages stimulating but
soluble
Fn
shown
to
the
growth monocyte/macrophage
and/or
secretion
factor
Fn
agglutinate of
[23] and cytotoxic
frag-
macromono-
IL-i [1], activity
fragments have been shown to be chemotactic [7] and to enhance complement-mediated [8]. Thorens et al. [34] have shown that murine express granulocyte-macrophage colonyfactor mRNA after adherence to Fn-coated
phagocytosis
plates
to
been
stimulate
cyte/macrophage-derived and to augment for
respond
has
not
on
exposure
of
nonadherent
capable of fragmenting Fn [5, 32]. The Fn fragments may serve as a chemoattractant to direct monocytes to the tissue sites. At these tissue sites, Fn or Fn fragments may further activate monocytes to stimulate wound repair or tumor cell destruction. Furthermore, Fn can also serve as an adhesion [12, 37] and costimulatory molecule for T lymphocytes [24, 33]. Thus, Fn bound to the monocyte surface may serve as an important cell-cell adhesion molecule [18] and cytokineinducing signal that augments lymphocyte reactivity.
peritoneal
cells
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors assistance.
1. Beezhold,
or
Fn
enhances
the
expression
of
IL-i
and
[9]
are
not
contradictory;
rather,
taken
together
they
that
Fn
can
have
variable
effects
Lause,
for
D.B. by
Invest. 16, 437, 1987. 2. Beezhold, D.H., Best, G.K., M. Endotoxin enhancement i-induced
secretion
Rev. Infect. 3. Beezhold,
tumor
his
excellent
E.J.,
and
technical
Med.
167,
the
of
P.F., shock
1 by
and Thompson, syndrome toxin macrophages.
J.A.,
and
Hall,
secretion
RE.
Fibronectin
RAE,
Dvorak,
HF.,
and
receptors
126, 787, 1981. 7. Clark, RAE, Wilkner,
N.E.,
of phagoproteins j
RB.
D.E.,
from
Fibronectin
reactions: associations cell activation. j
Doherty,
of
Exp.
proteases 193, 1987.
48,
Colvin,
skin endothelial
induces
monocytes.
binding leukocytes.
77, 1988. and Chen, W. Fibronectin-degrading membranes of transformed cells. Cell
delayed-type hypersensitivity vessel permeability and
P48
by human
J. ,
6. Clark,
macroImrnunol.
murine
of the Arg-Gly-Asp polymorphonuclear
and
rat
fibronectin.
1989.
Goodwin,J.L.
Characterization monocytes
5. Chen,
interleukin
S289,
Leftwich,
cytes. human
Stimulation plasma
Bonventre, of toxic
factor and IL-i 143, 3217, 1989.
Immunol.
J.
4. Brown,
of
11,
Die. D.H.,
necrosis
and
in with
Immunol.
Norris,
D.A.
Cryptic chemotactic activity of fibronectin for human monocytes resides in the 120-kDa fibroblastic cell-binding domain. j BioL Chem. 263, 12115, 1988. 8. Czop, J.K., Kadish, J.L., Zepf, D.M., and Austin, K.F. Augmentation of phagocytosis by a specific fibronectin fragment links
particulate
10.
to the fibronectin adherence Immunol. 129, 2678, 1982. Johnson, CE., and Haskill, J.S. Human monomediator gene expression is selectively regu-
O.C.,
of the
spliced
171, 11.
D.A.,
and
Gifford,
toxic
assays
for
tumor
1767,
1984.
Godfrey, phages
to
line
141, Godfrey,
G.E.
of
1970,
C.
U937
1989.
Specific
to the
bind-
alternatively J. Exp. Med.
fibronectin.
Comparison
necrosis
factor.
,
and
agglutination
Goodman,
lymphokine
1508,
j
of in vitro cell Immunol. Methods
cyto-
68,
E.A., define
by
factor
(MAggF,
Kindler,
J.W. cloned
H.L.,
Production mouse
T
T
FASEB
fucose-receptor.
cell
j
Angadi,
4,
CV.,
of a fibronectincells. J. Immunol.
1988. H.P.,
Canfield,
L.S.,
Kaplan, J., Brown, E.J., and man macrophage agglutination munology 67, 321, 1989.
and
Bianco,
Carter, W.G. , and Ferreira, an alternative mechanism of Immunol. 144, 3361, 1990. Donson, J. Response of human macro-
H.P., and macrophage
J.J.
associated
Beezhold
cell
fibronectin) involves a monocyte A1757, 1990. Godfrey, H.P., Canfield, L.S.,
Tomasek,
15.
and
(IIICS)
A. , Wayner, O.C. Human B lymphocytes adhesion to fibronectin. j
13.
14.
segment
142,
Immunol.
A.,
1990.
Flick,
Garcia-Pardo,
(transcriptional
J.
monocyte
connecting
12.
sug-
substrates.
Garcia-Pardo,
human
351,
J.
monocytes.
by adherence
Ferreira,
ing
activators
of human
lated
TNF
Martin
1 secretion
9. Eierman, D.F., cyte inflammatory
or posttranscriptional) depending on the state of activation of the monocyte/macrophage. In addition, it appears that the molecular form of Fn that a macrophage encounters may regulate the type and extent of the response. The Fn-monocyte interaction has important implications for host defense and tissue repair. Increased amounts of Fn are deposited at sites of inflammation [6] and tissue injury [ 19]. Metastatic tumor cells express several types of proteases gest
and
interleukin
receptor
mRNA but does not result in secretion of the cytokines. Our data demonstrate that monocytes that are isolated by adherence to plastic (which induces cytokine mRNA) can be triggered by soluble Fn or Fn fragments to secrete cytokines. Our studies and those ofThorens et al. [34] and Eierman et al.
D.H.,
phage
that
to
Tom
REFERENCES
soluble Fn. They suggest that macrophages must be adherent to a solid support for Fn to exert its action. Eierman et al. [9] have shown that adherence of human monocytes to plastic
thank
Personius
Haakfrendscho,
Kaplan, factor
Fibronectin-induced
M.,
Melancon-
A.P. Relationship to other fibronectins.
TNF
secretion
of huIm-
63
16. Humphries, sis 17.
by
M.J.,
J.,
Jesty,
program
D
Godfrey,
for
parallel-line
Pathol.
485,
cluster
formation
fibronectin
Ayad,
digests
and
85, 18. Klingemann,
19.
and
cathepsin
and
Parlin,
Y.,
bioassays.
and
lymphocyte Leuk. Biol.
J.
Zhu,
a general of
R.,
Hales,
of DNA synthe305, 8i1, 1983. microcomputer
Nature
analysis
1986. H.-G., Storb,
R.L.,
Stimulation
fibronectin.
H.P.
antiserum.
Kradin,
SR.
of
Deeg,
Am.
H.J.
j
Inhibition
proliferation
49,
CA.,
152,
Clin.
of
by
1984.
anti-
1991.
Bianco,
29.
C.,
and
Colvin,
RB. nary
20.
Response of pulmonary macrophages to hyperoxic pulmoinjury. Am. j Paihol. 125, 349, i986. Lause, D.B. , Doran, J. , and Houston, J. Interaction of plasma fibronectin in the in vitro allograft response. Transplantation 34, 147,
21.
23.
Lause,
D.B.,
Lause, phocyte Immunol. Martin,
Doran,
and
D.B., blast
J.E.,
and
24.
Cotran,
Houston,
Am. j
Perri,
R.T.,
tion
of
the
antibodies 259,
31.
Beezhold,
32.
by plasma
Induction fibronectin
Majeau,
of lymin vitro. j
by
Kay,J.,
plasma
Yamada,
Morimoto,
57, E.
375,
E.,
adhesion:
RGD
Sas,
D.F.,
KM.,
Shimizu,
of CD4
A synergistic
fibronectin
receptor
McCarthy,
J.,
effect
complex.
j
Exp.
Hayman,
Vessella,
enhances activity. E.G.,
cell-attachment
site
and
fragments
in
and
fibronectin
of
60,
Blood Ruoslathi,
E.
with
the
430,
1982.
monoclonal
molecule.
Cell
26,
the
VLA-6
Volume
51
,
January
1992
and
37.
receptors.
B.,
mono-
Immunol.
Annu.
Rev.
Im-
Biochem.
J.B.,
cell
laminin.
J.
induce
posttranscriptional
E.A.,
substrates
46,
Horgan,
145,
59,
Cell
and
by
1986. Shaw,
S.
CD4+
with
and Vassalli, P. GM-CSF mRNA
D.H., and Lause, secretion by LPS.
and
resting
VLA-5
E.E., and Wahl, a chemattractant
3082,
K.J., of
and
Immunol.
T
fibronectin
1990. Phagocytosis in macrophages
48, 671, 1987. D.B. Modulation j Leukoc. Biol. SM. for
Macrophage fibroblasts.
and
of 45,
j
1981.
Garcia-Pardo,
A.,
J.A., and Carter, W.G. Identification T lymphocyte adhesion receptor ment domain (CS-i) in plasma 1989.
Clearing
regulation.
Y., Helsel, of fibronectin,
673,
L.T.
from
VLA-4
J.,
stimuli
Furcht,
proteins Cancer Res.
responses
of
in cell
1987.
and
proliferative
perspectives 491,
GA.,
Seventer,
New
238,
Science
membrane variants.
Mermod,
127,
M.D.
integrins.
interaction
Tsukamoto, production Wayner,
its
Pierschbacher, and
Van
with
Thorens,
1321,
Biology
and
of
Immunol.
Loca-
enhances
Gun.
fibronectin.
1990.
35. Trotter, KM., Beezhold, macrophage fibronectin 515, 1989.
R.L., Jacob, in vitro monocyte-
Lipopolysaccharide
Fibronectin
basement tumor Y.,
through
Akiyama,
363,
McCarthy,
of
by
R.A. matrix-bound
1988.
Ruoslathi,
or 34.
fibronec-
C. Activation
antibody.
Furcht, L.T. Fibronectin mediated tumoricidal
of Leukocyte
Polin, to
munopathol. Ruoslathi,
cells
ER.,
36.
proteolytic
and
inflammatory
anti-CD3
N.E.,
M.D.,
Unanue,
1981.
Journal
33.
1983.
and
and
adherence
release metastatic
monocyte/macrophage-
production
A.,
S.F.,
G.R.,
of human
367,
by the VLA-5 1133, 1989.
Pierschbacher,
and
P.,
cyte
Costimulation
(MDGF)
Yamada,
Kay,
Doran,J.E. purified
MA.,
111,
fibronectin
H.S. , and macrophage
64
PathoL T.,
by
and by
Stimulation factor
Schlossman,
mediated med. 170,
26.
R.S.
J.A.,
transformation
Roth,
57,
1984.
Gimbrone,
growth
S.K.,
25.
1294,
B.M.,
Matsuyama,
cells
Beezhold, D.H., transformation
132,
derived
tin.
30.
1982.
D.H. Modulation of rat lymphocyte fibronectin. j Res. 34, 437, 1983. 22.
27. Postlethwaite, A., Keski-Oia, E.J., Balian, G., and Kang, A.H. Induction of fibroblast chemotaxis by fibronectin. Localization of the chemotactic region to a 140,000-molecular weight nongelatin-binding fragment. J. Exp. Med. 153, 494, 1981. 28. Raynor, RH., and Reese, AC. Effect of fibronectin on macrophage-induced tumor cell cytostasis. Oncology 41, 420,
M.J., McDonald, and characterization of the for an alternative cell attachfibronectin. J. Cell Biol. 109,
Humphries,