Health Care Worker Exposures to Pertussis: Missed Opportunities for Prevention Danica E. Kuncio, Maria Middleton, Mary G. Cooney, Mark Ramos, Susan E. Coffin and Kristen A. Feemster Pediatrics 2014;133;15; originally published online December 16, 2013; DOI: 10.1542/peds.2013-0745

The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is located on the World Wide Web at: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/133/1/15.full.html

PEDIATRICS is the official journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. A monthly publication, it has been published continuously since 1948. PEDIATRICS is owned, published, and trademarked by the American Academy of Pediatrics, 141 Northwest Point Boulevard, Elk Grove Village, Illinois, 60007. Copyright © 2014 by the American Academy of Pediatrics. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0031-4005. Online ISSN: 1098-4275.

Downloaded from pediatrics.aappublications.org at Univ Of Colorado on September 25, 2014

ARTICLE

Health Care Worker Exposures to Pertussis: Missed Opportunities for Prevention AUTHORS: Danica E. Kuncio, MPH,a,b Maria Middleton, MPH,b Mary G. Cooney, RN, BSN,b Mark Ramos,b Susan E. Coffin, MD, MPH,b,c,d and Kristen A. Feemster, MD, MPH, MSHPb,c,d,e,f aYale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut; and bThe Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, cUniversity of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, fLeonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, dCenter for Pediatric Clinical Effectiveness, and ePolicyLab at Children’s Hospital of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

KEY WORDS infection control, pertussis, occupational exposure, health care worker, ambulatory care ABBREVIATIONS ED—emergency department EHR—electronic health record HCW—health care worker IPC—infection prevention and control IPCD—Infection Prevention and Control Department OH—occupational health OHD—Occupational Health Department PEP—postexposure prophylaxis PPE—personal protective equipment Tdap—tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis Ms Kuncio contributed to study design, performed data collection and analyses, and produced the first draft of and reviewed and revised the manuscript; Ms Middleton aided in data cleaning and analyses and reviewed and revised the manuscript; Ms Cooney contributed to study design and implementation and reviewed and revised the manuscript; Mr Ramos contributed to data collection and study execution and reviewed and revised the manuscript; Dr Coffin contributed to study design, actively directed data analyses, and reviewed and revised the manuscript; Dr Feemster conceptualized the study design, supervised data analyses and study implementation, and reviewed and revised the manuscript; and all authors approved the final manuscript as submitted. www.pediatrics.org/cgi/doi/10.1542/peds.2013-0745 doi:10.1542/peds.2013-0745 Accepted for publication Sep 27, 2013 Address correspondence to Kristen Feemster, MD, MPH, MSHP, Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Division of Infectious Diseases, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, CHOP North, 3535 Market Street, Room 1511, Philadelphia, PA 19104. E-mail: [email protected] PEDIATRICS (ISSN Numbers: Print, 0031-4005; Online, 1098-4275). Copyright © 2014 by the American Academy of Pediatrics (Continued on last page)

WHAT’S KNOWN ON THIS SUBJECT: The incidence of pertussis has significantly increased, and infection can result in severe disease among young children. This highly contagious disease may frequently be transmitted in pediatric health care settings, necessitating effective infection control practices to reduce exposure risk. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: Despite institutional guidelines, pediatric health care workers (HCWs) are frequently exposed to pertussis because of delayed or incomplete adherence to infection control practices. Inconsistent reporting may also result in missed HCW exposures, increasing the risk of subsequent transmission to patients.

abstract OBJECTIVE: Pediatric health care workers (HCWs) are at particular risk for pertussis exposure, infection, and subsequent disease transmission to susceptible patients. This cross-sectional study describes the epidemiology of occupational exposures to pertussis and identifies factors that may inform interventions to promote effective implementation of infection prevention and control (IPC) guidelines. METHODS: We abstracted data from occupational health (OH) and IPC records for pertussis cases that resulted in an exposure investigation in a large quaternary pediatric care network, January 1, 2002 to July 18, 2011. We calculated the frequency of occupational exposures and measured associated characteristics. To assess the frequency of potential missed exposures, we reviewed electronic health record (EHR) data identifying laboratory-confirmed pertussis cases not documented in OH or IPC records. RESULTS: A total of 1193 confirmed HCW pertussis exposures were associated with 219 index cases during the study period. Of these, 38.8% were infants ,6 months old and 7 were HCWs. Most (77.5%) of exposures occurred in the emergency department or an ambulatory site; 27.0% of exposures occurred after documented initiation of IPC precautions. We identified 450 laboratory-confirmed pertussis cases through EHR review, of which 49.8% (N = 224) had no OH or IPC investigation. The majority of uninvestigated cases (77.2%) were from ambulatory sites. CONCLUSIONS: Occupational exposures to pertussis occur frequently in pediatric health care settings despite appropriate IPC guidelines. Interventions are needed to ensure consistent implementation of IPC practices and timely identification and reporting of pertussis index cases to prevent HCW exposures and potential transmission to patients. Pediatrics 2014;133:15–21

PEDIATRICS Volume 133, Number 1, January 2014

Downloaded from pediatrics.aappublications.org at Univ Of Colorado on September 25, 2014

15

Pertussis is a highly communicable acute respiratory illness that remains endemic, despite the availability of an effective vaccine.1,2 The incidence of pertussis has steadily increased in the past few decades, especially among adults and adolescents,1–3 and is a cause of hospital-associated outbreaks.4–10 Infected health care workers (HCWs) can serve as an important transmission vector for susceptible people, particularly young infants.4,11–13 Adults are more likely to have mild or atypical symptoms, and therefore infected HCWs may continue to work with unrecognized illness.1,4,8 HCWs often have high occupational mobility in pediatric facilities, promoting the spread of acquired pathogens.14,15 Lastly, HCW attitudes toward perceived risk of infection and disease severity may affect the use of IPC interventions.16–18 Occupational exposures to critical pathogens are regularly documented and investigated as an important part of IPC strategy.3,9,14,19 Given the significant morbidity and mortality associated with pertussis infection, especially in the pediatric population, it is crucial to identify exposed HCWs to prevent infection and subsequent transmission to co-workers and patients. Prevention of secondary cases of pertussis among exposed pediatric HCWs requires timely reporting of index cases and investigating for possible exposures so that affected HCWs can receive postexposure prophylaxis (PEP). This requires the presence of a reporting mechanism and knowledge of reporting requirements. Exposure investigations and subsequent interventions therefore result in substantial work and significant cost for the Infection Prevention and Control Department (IPCD) and Occupational Health Department (OHD) staff.8,12,14,20 The objective of this study was to determine the epidemiology of occupational exposures to pertussis in a large 16

pediatric health care network and to determine whether current reporting methods completely capture all pertussis cases. Results from this work will inform efforts to improve HCW adherence to appropriate precautions, especially in ambulatory settings, and to ensure that pediatric HCWs do not develop pertussis.

METHODS Study Design This cross-sectional study of occupational exposures to pertussis was performed through a retrospective review of IPCD and OHD records from a large quaternary pediatric care network. We identified all investigated HCW exposures to pertussis between January 1, 2002 and July 18, 2011. We also used electronic health record (EHR) data to identify all laboratory-confirmed cases diagnosed within the health care network during the same time period and compared them with the list of those identified through occupational exposure investigations. All cases identified through the EHR that did not have documentation of an occupational exposure investigation were considered a source of potential missed exposures. This study was approved by the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia’s Institutional Review Board. Study Site and Subjects The study site is a pediatric health care network that includes a tertiary care hospital, a 29-practice primary care network, and multiple subspecialty and surgical care centers throughout the 5-county metropolitan Philadelphia region and southern New Jersey. The study site has a well-established IPC and OHD program with clear guidelines for the prevention of HCW exposure based on recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.7 Ambulatory sites within the

network are covered by the same IPC guidelines and reporting systems as the inpatient units and emergency departments (EDs), yet their use varies greatly between sites. An index case was defined as any patient who had a laboratory-confirmed diagnosis of pertussis that also resulted in an HCW exposure. Potential exposures were defined as HCWs involved in the care of the index case before investigation. A confirmed exposure was defined as any HCW who had direct face-to-face contact within 3 feet of an index case regardless of the length of contact time and the vaccination status of the exposed person. Fulfillment of these criteria was confirmed by the OHD through interviews with each potentially exposed person. An exposure was deemed to occur when an HCW reported direct contact with an index case without the use of IPC precautions. This may occur before implementation of IPC precautions such as personal protective equipment (PPE) use or as a result of incomplete adherence to IPC guidelines. Pertussis Investigations IPCDreceivesnotificationofalllaboratoryconfirmed cases of pertussis within the network and initiates an investigation for each case to identify all HCWs who were potentially exposed during the patient’s episode of care. Results of the initial investigation are forwarded to the OHD, which follows up with all identified HCWs, confirms whether an exposure occurred, and initiates any interventions indicated to prevent the development of disease (ie, administration of PEP). IPCD records document only postexposure interventions initiated by OHD. Data Collection Data for all confirmed occupational exposures were abstracted from the Employee Exposure Investigation forms

KUNCIO et al

Downloaded from pediatrics.aappublications.org at Univ Of Colorado on September 25, 2014

ARTICLE

maintained by the OHD. Forms included information from HCW interviews, review of the index case’s medical chart, and review of OHD records. Specific data elements included age, gender, and select clinical information on each index case, information about employee–patient contact, employee vaccination history, IPC precautions in place at the time of exposure, the OHD recommended intervention, and actual action taken by the exposed HCWs. Missed Cases To determine the frequency of uninvestigated pertussis cases, we reviewed laboratory data from the study site’s EHR. The EHR includes the Epic suite of clinical and administrative products (EpicCare, Epic Systems Corporation, Verona, WI) and is used for all aspects of clinical care at the study site. Using Epic, we performed a query for all polymerase chain reaction– positive Bordetella pertussis cases during the same study period. We compared the cases identified through the OHD record review with those identified through Epic, using birthdates and encounter date. Any pertussis case identified through Epic that was not listed in IPCD and OHD investigation records was considered an uninvestigated case and a potential source of missed HCW exposures. Chart Review A sample of missed cases was investigated by chart review using the EHR system Chartmaxx (MedPlus, Inc., Cincinnati, OH). This system contains full medical record information for an encounter. The chart review provided illness and treatment information for the missed cases and identified the number of HCWs associated with their care. Statistical Analyses Statistical analyses were performed to indicate any trends in the data while

stratifying for explanatory variables. For descriptive analyses, categorical variables, such as the care site, were summarized by frequencies, and continuous variables, such as age, were summarized using medians. For the primary study objective we used x2 tests of association to identify any significant relationships between index case, site, and HCW characteristics and frequency of exposure.

vaccination of all newly hired HCWs), 64% of confirmed exposures to pertussis were reported, and 36.3% of exposures were confirmed between January 1, 2008 and July 18, 2011 (Table 1). Most exposures occurred in the ED and in ambulatory sites (77.5%) during both time periods. Front-line clinical staff (physicians, nurses, and nurse practitioners) made up the majority of exposed staff during both time periods at all sites.

For the secondary analysis of missed and captured cases, we performed univariable and multivariate logistic regression for the likelihood of being missed by IPCD case capture while adjusting for site, age of index case, and the time period of encounter. Specifically, we compared data between 2 time periods, before and after an institutional requirement for tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis (Tdap) vaccination of all newly hired HCWs, which began in 2008. We hypothesized that this policy change would increase awareness about occupational exposures to pertussis and result in more vigilant use of PPE. All statistical analyses were performed by using SAS software, version 9.2 (SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, NC). Graphics were produced by using Excel (Microsoft Office System, 2010).

Approximately half (46.9%) of HCW pertussis exposure events resulted from a delay in the implementation of respiratory precautions. The ED had the highest proportion (65.0%, N = 258) of pertussis exposures because of the delayed initiation of droplet precautions, as compared with the other sites (data not shown). Twenty-seven percent of exposures occurred after documented initiation of appropriate precautions; this occurred less frequently in 2008 through 2011 compared with 2002 through 2007 (18.7% and 31.8%, respectively). The majority of HCW exposures (71.1%, N = 848) occurred while the HCW was providing care for an index case who had the presence of respiratory symptoms clearly documented in his or her chart. Occupational Health Interventions

RESULTS A total of 226 pertussis cases were reviewed by IPCD and OHD. Of these, 219 (96.9%) resulted in 1193 confirmed HCW exposures and were considered index cases. The median age of pertussis index cases was 0.5 years, and the median number of associated confirmed HCW exposures was 3.0. Seven pertussis index cases (3.1%) were HCWs who had exposed co-workers and patients. HCW index cases accounted for a disproportionate number of HCW exposures (175 [14.7%]). Between January 1, 2002 and the end of 2007 (the time period before the institutional requirement for Tdap

The OHD recommended chemoprophylaxis for the majority of confirmed exposures to pertussis. Therefore, 90.6% of HCWs exposed to pertussis (N = 1081) were given and filled a PEP prescription, most commonly for azithromycin. Of the exposed HCWs, 3% declined to follow OHD recommendations because of previously prescribed medication, pregnancy, or other medical contraindications to antibiotic use. Furlough was recommended in 3 instances during the study period: 1 HCW developed laboratory-confirmed pertussis, and 2 HCWs developed symptoms consistent with pertussis within 21 days after exposure to an index case.

PEDIATRICS Volume 133, Number 1, January 2014

Downloaded from pediatrics.aappublications.org at Univ Of Colorado on September 25, 2014

17

TABLE 1 Documented Cases of Pertussis Resulting in Confirmed Occupational Exposures Total index cases Age group of index case, N (%) #6 mo 6–23 mo 2–6 y 7–11 y .11 y HCW as index Unavailable No. HCWs exposed/index case, N (%) 1–5 HCWs 6–15 HCWs $16 HCWs Total potential exposures Total confirmed exposures Site, N (%) Main hospital ED Ambulatory sites Unavailable Job, N (%) MD, DO, PhD, nurse practitioner Nursing Ancillary staff or other clinical servicesc Nonclinical hospital staff Unavailable Precautions in place at time of exposure,d N (%) No Yes Unavailable Index case had respiratory symptoms, N (%) Yes No Unavailable Intervention performed, N (%) Prophylaxis Furlough or other Declined recommendations Nonee Unavailable

2002–2007

2008–2011a

Total

128

91

219

49 (39) 7 (5) 4 (3) 7 (6) 13 (10) 5 (4) 43 (34)

36 (40) 13 (14) 7 (8) 21 (23) 10 (11) 2 (2) 2 (2)

85 (39) 20 (9) 11 (5) 28 (13) 23 (11) 7 (3) 45 (21)

91 (71) 27 (21) 10 (8) 1187 759

68 (74) 21 (23) 2 (2) 606 434

159 (72) 48 (22) 12 (5) 1793 1193

143 (19) 307 (40) 260 (34) 49 (6)

71 (16) 231 (53) 127 (29) 5 (1)

214 (18) 538 (45) 387 (32) 54 (6)

Pb ,.0001

.4

,.0001

,.0001 194 (26) 173 (23) 83 (11) 15 (2) 294 (39)

140 (32) 156 (36) 81 (19) 2 (.1) 55 (13)

334 (28) 329 (28) 164 (14) 17 (1) 349 (29)

333 (44) 241 (32) 185 (24)

226 (52) 81 (19) 127 (29)

559 (47) 322 (27) 312 (26)

457 (60) 242 (32) 60 (8)

391 (90) 36 (8) 7 (2)

848 (71) 278 (23) 67 (6)

664 (87) 9 (1) 21 (3) 59 (8) 6 (1)

417 (96) 1 (,1) 10 (2) 5 (1) 1 (,1)

1081 (91) 10 (1) 31 (3) 64 (5) 7 (1)

.001

,.0001

We identified 450 laboratory-confirmed cases of pertussis from the site’s EHR during the study period, including 224 (49.8%) for which there was no evidence of an exposure investigation (Table 2). Fifty-five (24.5%) of these missed cases of pertussis were diagnosed in 2002 through 2007, with a mean of 9.2 (95% confidence interval, 18

We performed a chart review of 24 (11%) randomly selected uninvestigated pertussis cases using EHR data from the encounter in which pertussis was diagnosed. In 22 (92%) of these charts, initiation of droplet precautions was not documented, although cough or respiratory infection was documented as the chief complaint for 12 (55%) of these cases. The 2 cases (8%) for whom precautions were initiated were admitted patients in the main hospital. The estimates for potential HCW exposures differed by site. Based on EHR review, encounters that took place at ambulatory sites noted 1 primary clinician involved in index case care, indicating at least 1 potentially exposed HCW per index case. Meanwhile, encounters at the main hospital or ED listed multiple physicians and nurses who assessed the patient, suggesting several potential exposures per uninvestigated case.

,.0001

N = number of cases of infection for which an exposure investigation was completed. Percentages may not total to 100% because of rounding. a 2011 data include only cases encountered between January 1 and July 18 of that year. b P is for the x 2 statistic determined for the variable in question. c Includes radiology and respiratory therapy. d Includes no mask use specifically noted, precautions noted as being initiated after exposure, or precautions being noted as never being initiated. e No intervention performed because of medical contraindication(eg, pregnancy), previous prescription, or refusal to take prophylaxis.

Missed Exposures

had a documented investigation, compared with 80% of ED and 78% of main hospital cases.

6.2 to 12.2) cases per year, and 169 (75.4%) were diagnosed in 2008 through 2011, with a mean of 42.3 (95% confidence interval, 26.4 to 90.9) cases per year. The proportion of pertussis cases without an IPCD investigation increased substantially between 2002 through 2007 and 2008 through 2011 (38.9% and 65.0%, respectively). Only 25.7% of cases from an ambulatory site

DISCUSSION In this study, we describe a large pediatric care network’s experience with HCW exposures to pertussis over a 10year period. To our knowledge, this is the largest retrospective study of occupational exposures to pertussis in a health care setting to date. Our results show that pertussis accounts for most documented HCW exposure events to critical pathogens, and HCW exposure occurs even after initiation of appropriate precautions. We also found that a substantial proportion of laboratoryconfirmed pertussis cases were not reported to IPC and may have been associated with missed HCW exposures. Therefore, the true magnitude of pertussis exposure in this health care network is probably much greater than the real-time IPCD investigations

KUNCIO et al

Downloaded from pediatrics.aappublications.org at Univ Of Colorado on September 25, 2014

ARTICLE

TABLE 2 Laboratory-Confirmed Pertussis Cases With and Without an Exposure Investigation, 2002–2011

Age group of case 6 mo or less 6–23 mo 2–6 y 7–11 y 11+ y HCW index case Unavailable Year group 2002–2007 2008–2011 Site Main hospital ER Ambulatory site Unavailable

Investigated Cases, N (%)

Cases Without an Investigation, N (%)

Total Pertussis Cases, N (%)

226 (50)

224 (50)

450

121 (54) 33 (15) 16 (7) 27 (12) 20 (9) 5 (2) 4 (2)

28 (13) 21 (9) 64 (29) 76 (34) 34 (15) 0 1 (,1)

149 (33) 54 (12) 80 (18) 103 (23) 54 (12) 5 (1) 5 (1)

135 (60) 91 (40)

55 (25) 169 (75)

190 (42) 260 (58)

103 (46) 62 (27) 60 (27) 1 (,1)

27 (12) 18 (8) 173 (77) 6 (3)

130 (29) 80 (18) 233 (52) 7 (2)

Percentages may not total to 100 because of rounding.

indicated. We also identified characteristics associated with HCW exposures to pertussis, which may have important implications for IPC policies to prevent pertussis transmission to both HCWs and patients. More effective IPC policies may help decrease the costs and the burden on the health care environment that results from disease outbreaks and occupational exposures. Over a 10-year period, we found 219 pertussis cases that resulted in 1193 HCW exposures. This demonstrates a significant risk for pertussis transmission within a pediatric health care system. Not only are patients at risk for transmission from exposed HCWs who may become infected, but disease transmission may also occur between co-workers, as illustrated by the 7 HCW index cases identified in our results.4 The frequency of pertussis exposures may be influenced by the increasing prevalence of pertussis among pediatric patients. In particular, our findings indicated that the majority of pertussis index cases were among infants (#6 months), who are at highest risk for developing severe disease.2 Exposure frequency may also reflect

the challenge of diagnosing pertussis, especially among older children and adolescents, who are more likely to have atypical symptoms and for whom the diagnosis of pertussis may not be immediately suspected. The frequency of pertussis exposures we identified suggests that interventions are needed to ensure timely implementation of and adherence to IPC protocols. In particular, our data indicate that a quarter of exposures happened after precautions were initiated, underscoring the challenges of implementing transmission-based precautions. There are well-established guidelines to prevent exposure and subsequent disease development, but it is unclear how effective these guidelines are in different settings, particularly in ambulatory settings.16,19,21,22 Ambulatory sites have unique features compared with inpatient and ED settings that may contribute to the frequency of both identified and missed exposures.7,19 Masks and other supplies may not be readily available in triage areas or examination rooms in ambulatory sites, decreasing compliance to precautions.19 Evidence suggests that IPC

guidelines in ambulatory sites are not uniformly implemented,7,16,19 and therefore knowledge about effective prevention practices and reporting procedures may vary. It is crucial that HCWs be informed about policies and procedures and that the tools needed to follow guidelines be consistently available. Education programs targeting guideline adherence have been shown to improve IPC practices.8,9,16 Targeting work site and HCW characteristics associated with pertussis exposure is probably critical to the successful implementation of precautions designed to interrupt pertussis transmission in an ambulatory setting. We found that the majority of pertussis exposures occurred in the ED or in ambulatory settings, and almost half occurred before the initiation of droplet precautions. HCWs who perform triage activities may have elevated risk of exposure. Additionally, attitudes toward pertussis may affect the use of PPE. For example, previous studies have shown that HCWs do not perceive themselves to be at high risk for developing pertussis infection despite knowledge about pertussis transmission.8,13,17 Our study also found that a substantial proportion of pertussis cases were not reported and investigated by OHD and IPCD. Case identification is the first step in ensuring that IPC guidelines are implemented. These results suggest that reporting guidelines were not uniformly followed. The majority of identified uninvestigated cases were patients from ambulatory sites. We were not able to establish the true magnitude of exposures resulting from these uninvestigated cases, although our chart review indicated that at least 1 and up to 12 HCWs were potentially exposed for each case. Case identification is a significant challenge for the prevention of pertussis exposure. This is suggested by

PEDIATRICS Volume 133, Number 1, January 2014

Downloaded from pediatrics.aappublications.org at Univ Of Colorado on September 25, 2014

19

the high proportion of exposures that occurred before initiation of appropriate precautions. Surveillance for pertussis can be difficult because of the nonspecific nature of many symptoms (eg cough, runny nose), particularly in older children, adolescents, and adults.6 Pertussis infection therefore may not be initially recognized or reported in these groups.8,9,23 Particularly during periods of high transmission, heightened suspicion of pertussis in any child presenting with an afebrile cough illness is important, and mask use may be needed for both symptomatic patients and HCWs during health care encounters. Early implementation of droplet precautions is essential to prevent potential transmission, but this requires implementation before an exposure event can occur. If all HCWs wear masks for any patient with a cough or if all children who present with cough illnesses are given a mask on arrival until likelihood of pertussis can be better established through history and physical, many exposures could be prevented. Another preexposure prevention strategy is HCW Tdap vaccination, which may decrease the impact of missed and underreported cases. Vaccination of all HCWs with Tdap is recommended by the Advisory Commission of Immunization Practices24 and has been found in several studies to be a cost-effective intervention.8,14,15,17,18,25,26

Our study does have limitations. It was a retrospective review of IPCD and OHD reports, and although these reports were standardized, data were not systematically collected for research purposes. Confirmation of exposure was based primarily on self-report, which could result in recall biases that may underestimate or overestimate the number of occupational exposures. Additionally, there were missing data from exposure investigations, especially in 2002 through 2007 compared with 2008 through 2011. This may affect the comparability of results between these time periods. IPCD and OHD reports did not generally provide information such as employee vaccination status or testing results from exposed HCWs that may have enabled us to estimate the incidence of secondary infection. However, the IPCD investigations were performed in real time and included data gleaned from a variety of sources, including HCW interviews and medical chart review, which strengthened data reliability. Lastly, we were not able to determine the reasons for uninvestigated pertussis cases; an IPC investigation form is not generated for all reported pertussis cases if it is clear after preliminary review that there were no exposures. However, this is not likely to account for all the uninvestigated cases that we identified. Despite its limitations, this study provides a comprehensive review of occupational exposures over nine and

a half years within a large pediatric health care system that includes both inpatient and ambulatory care settings and a diverse HCW and patient population.

personnel. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2006;55 (RR-17):1–37 2. Edwards KM. Overview of pertussis: focus on epidemiology, sources of infection, and long term protection after infant vaccination. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2005;24(6 Suppl):S104– S108 3. Zastrow RL. Emerging infections: pertussis on the rise. Am J Nurs. 2011;111(6):51– 56

4. Bassinet L, Matrat M, Njamkepo E, Aberrane S, Housset B, Guiso N. Nosocomial pertussis outbreak among adult patients and healthcare workers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2004;25(11):995–997 5. Bryant KA, Humbaugh K, Brothers K, et al Measures to control an outbreak of pertussis in a neonatal intermediate care nursery after exposure to a healthcare worker. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006;27(6):541–545

CONCLUSIONS This extensive review of HCW exposures to pertussis illustrates the importance of early case identification and uniform implementation of IPC transmissionbased guidelines to prevent occupational exposures in a pediatric care setting. Occupational exposures to pertussis occur frequently among a wide range of HCWs in all care settings, resulting in risk of infection among HCWs, who can then expose patients and co-workers. The large number of uninvestigated cases suggests that the true number of exposures may be underestimated. To most effectively prevent pertussis exposure and subsequent transmission, thorough case ascertainment and prompt initiation of droplet precautions are essential. Additional work is needed to identify the barriers to case identification and reporting for pertussis and the timely implementation of IPC precautions; this work can inform the development of interventions to improve practice. Future work can also investigate the impact of strategies such as employee vaccination, universal use of droplet precautions, and education programs to promote appropriate PPE use.

REFERENCES 1. Kretsinger K, Broder KR, Cortese MM, et al Preventing tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis among adults: use of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis vaccine recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) and recommendation of ACIP, supported by the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC), for use of Tdap among health-care

20

KUNCIO et al

Downloaded from pediatrics.aappublications.org at Univ Of Colorado on September 25, 2014

ARTICLE

6. Faulkner A, Skoff T, Martin S, et al. Pertussis. Manual for the Surveillance of Vaccine-Preventable Diseases. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2005 7. Canadian Paediatric Society. Infection control in paediatric office settings. Paediatr Child Health (Oxf). 2008;13(5):408–435 8. Leekha S, Thompson RL, Sampathkumar P. Epidemiology and control of pertussis outbreaks in a tertiary care center and the resource consumption associated with these outbreaks. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009;30(5):467–473 9. Weber DJ, Rutala WA. Pertussis: an underappreciated risk for nosocomial outbreaks. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1998;19(11):825–828 10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Outbreaks of pertussis associated with hospitals—Kentucky, Pennsylvania, and Oregon, 2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005;54(3):67–71 11. Posfay-Barbe KM, Zerr DM, Pittet D. Infection control in paediatrics. Lancet Infect Dis. 2008;8(1):19–31 12. Edwards KM, Talbot TR. The challenges of pertussis outbreaks in healthcare facilities: is there a light at the end of the tunnel? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006;27(6): 537–540 13. Peadon E, Cooper C. Whooping cough: are health-care workers putting children at

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

risk? J Paediatr Child Health. 2007;43(5): 398–402 Greer AL, Fisman DN. Keeping vulnerable children safe from pertussis: preventing nosocomial pertussis transmission in the neonatal intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009;30(11):1084–1089 Greer AL, Fisman DN. Use of models to identify cost-effective interventions: pertussis vaccination for pediatric health care workers. Pediatrics. 2011;128(3). Available at: www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/128/ 3/e591 Turnberg W, Daniell W, Simpson T, et al Personal healthcare worker (HCW) and work-site characteristics that affect HCWs’ use of respiratory-infection control measures in ambulatory healthcare settings. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009;30(1): 47–52 Top KA, Halperin BA, Baxendale D, MacKinnonCameron D, Halperin SA. Pertussis immunization in paediatric healthcare workers: knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and behaviour. Vaccine. 2010;28(10):2169–2173 Goins WP, Schaffner W, Edwards KM, Talbot TR. Healthcare workers’ knowledge and attitudes about pertussis and pertussis vaccination. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007;28(11):1284–1289 American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Infectious Diseases. Infection prevention and control in pediatric ambulatory settings. Pediatrics. 2007;120(3):650–665

20. Daskalaki I, Hennessey P, Hubler R, Long SS. Resource consumption in the infection control management of pertussis exposure among healthcare workers in pediatrics. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007;28(4): 412–417 21. Turnberg W, Daniell W, Seixas N, et al. Appraisal of recommended respiratory infection control practices in primary care and emergency department settings. Am J Infect Control. 2008;36(4):268–275 22. Tarrac SE. Application of the updated CDC isolation guidelines for health care facilities. AORN J. 2008;87(3):534–542 23. Lee GM, Lebaron C, Murphy TV, Lett S, Schauer S, Lieu TA. Pertussis in adolescents and adults: should we vaccinate? Pediatrics. 2005;115(6):1675–1684 24. Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Immunization of health-care personnel: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep. 2011;60(RR-7): 1–45 25. Weber DJ, Rutala WA, Schaffner W. Lessons learned: protection of healthcare workers from infectious disease risks. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(8 Suppl):S306–S314 26. Calugar A, Ortega-Sanchez IR, Tiwari T, Oakes L, Jahre JA, Murphy TV. Nosocomial pertussis: costs of an outbreak and benefits of vaccinating health care workers. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42(7):981–988

(Continued from first page) FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose. FUNDING: Supported by the Department of Pediatrics, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Dr Feemster has received honoraria from Pfizer, Inc and Abbott Laboratories for advisory board participation and consultancy. None of the other authors have indicated they have any potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

PEDIATRICS Volume 133, Number 1, January 2014

Downloaded from pediatrics.aappublications.org at Univ Of Colorado on September 25, 2014

21

Health Care Worker Exposures to Pertussis: Missed Opportunities for Prevention Danica E. Kuncio, Maria Middleton, Mary G. Cooney, Mark Ramos, Susan E. Coffin and Kristen A. Feemster Pediatrics 2014;133;15; originally published online December 16, 2013; DOI: 10.1542/peds.2013-0745 Updated Information & Services

including high resolution figures, can be found at: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/133/1/15.full.ht ml

References

This article cites 25 articles, 4 of which can be accessed free at: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/133/1/15.full.ht ml#ref-list-1

Citations

This article has been cited by 1 HighWire-hosted articles: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/133/1/15.full.ht ml#related-urls

Subspecialty Collections

This article, along with others on similar topics, appears in the following collection(s): Infectious Diseases http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/infectious _diseases_sub Vaccine/Immunization http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/vaccine:im munization_sub Pulmonology http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/pulmonolo gy_sub Respiratory Tract http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/respiratory _tract_sub

Permissions & Licensing

Information about reproducing this article in parts (figures, tables) or in its entirety can be found online at: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/site/misc/Permissions.xh tml

Reprints

Information about ordering reprints can be found online: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/site/misc/reprints.xhtml

PEDIATRICS is the official journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. A monthly publication, it has been published continuously since 1948. PEDIATRICS is owned, published, and trademarked by the American Academy of Pediatrics, 141 Northwest Point Boulevard, Elk Grove Village, Illinois, 60007. Copyright © 2014 by the American Academy of Pediatrics. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0031-4005. Online ISSN: 1098-4275.

Downloaded from pediatrics.aappublications.org at Univ Of Colorado on September 25, 2014

Health care worker exposures to pertussis: missed opportunities for prevention.

Pediatric health care workers (HCWs) are at particular risk for pertussis exposure, infection, and subsequent disease transmission to susceptible pati...
647KB Sizes 0 Downloads 0 Views