Accepted Manuscript Hysterectomy by Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES): a series of 137 patients Chyi-Long Lee, MD, PhD Kai-Yun Wu, MD Hsuan Su, MD Pei-Ju Wu, MD Chien-Min Han, MD Chih-Feng Yen, MD. PII:
S1553-4650(14)00206-4
DOI:
10.1016/j.jmig.2014.03.011
Reference:
JMIG 2277
To appear in:
The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
Received Date: 14 December 2013 Revised Date:
13 March 2014
Accepted Date: 13 March 2014
Please cite this article as: Lee CL, Wu KY, Su H, Wu PJ, Han CM, Yen CF, Hysterectomy by Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES): a series of 137 patients, The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology (2014), doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.03.011. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Hysterectomy
by
Transvaginal
Natural
Orifice
Transluminal
2
Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES): a series of 137 patients
3
Chyi-Long Lee, MD, PhD; Kai-Yun Wu, MD; Hsuan Su, MD; Pei-Ju Wu, MD,
4
Chien-Min Han, MD, Chih-Feng Yen, MD.
5
*The first 2 authors (Drs Lee and Wu) contributed equally to the study.
6
From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at
7
Linkou and University (Drs Lee, K-Y Wu, Su, Han, and Yen); the Graduate Institute of
8
Clinical Medical Sciences, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Tao-Yuan (Dr Yen);
9
and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chung Shan Medical University
SC
RI PT
1
Hospital, Taichung (Dr. P-J Wu), Taiwan, Republic of China.
11
Corresponding author: Chih-Feng Yen, MD, Department of Obstetrics and
12
Gynecology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, 5, Fu-Hsin St, Kwei-Shan,
13
Tao-Yuan, Taiwan 33305. Tel: +886-3-1200, E-mail:
[email protected] 14
Author contributions: C.-L.L., K.-Y.W., H.S. and C.-F.Y. conceived and designed the
15
study; K.-Y.W., H.S., P.-J. W. and C.-M. H. acquired the data; C.-F. Y. analyzed and
16
interpreted the data; K.-Y.W. and C.-F. Y. drafted the manuscript; C.-L.L. and C.-F.Y.
17
reviewed the data and revised the manuscript critically for scientific and intellectual
18
content. All authors approved the final version for submission.
19
Funding: This study was partially supported by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
20
research grants CMRPG370151 and CMRPG381361. Dr C.-F. Yen is the principal
21
investigator.
22
Financial Disclosure: All authors have no conflict of interest to be declared.
23
Presentation: This study was presented in part at the 42nd Global Congress of
24
Minimally Invasive Gynecology (Annual Meeting of the AAGL), Washington DC,
25
November 10-14, 2013.
26
Running title: Hysterectomy by Purely Transvaginal NOTES
27
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
10
2 Lee, Wu & Su et al.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 28
Précis
29 Transvaginal natural-orifice transluminal laparoscopic surgery (NOTES) is a safe
31
and feasible technique to undergo hysterectomy.
RI PT
30
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
32
3 Lee, Wu & Su et al.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ABSTRACT
34
Study Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of hysterectomy in benign
35
disease with transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES).
36
Design: Prospective observational study.
37
Setting: Tertiary referral medical center.
38
Patients: From May 2010 to August 2011, consecutive patients who were scheduled
39
for laparoscopic hysterectomy and without virginity or the suspicion of pelvic
40
inflammation, or cul-de-sac obliteration were included.
41
Intervention: Total hysterectomy with transvaginal NOTES.
42
Measurements and Main Results: All included patients were 137, with mean age
43
46.0±0.4 years and BMI 24.7±0.4 kg/m2 ([±SEM]), respectively, and transvaginal
44
NOTES was successfully completed in 130 (94.9%) patients. 15 patients underwent
45
concurrent adhesiolysis and 17 with adnexal procedures. Mean uterine weight was
46
450.0±24.1 gm, where 45 (34.6%) patients had weights >500gm, and 7 (5.4%) patients
47
>1000gm. Mean operative time was 88.2±4.1 minutes, with mean blood loss
48
257.7±23.9 mL. Two patients encountered intraoperative hemorrhage or unintended
49
cystotomy, another 5 with failure of transvaginal colpotomy due to a very narrow
50
vagina, cul-de-sac obliateration by bowel adhesions, or mass obstruction, and all
51
these 7 (5.1%) patients were successfully dealt with transabdominal laparoscopy.
52
Five (3.6%) patients experienced postoperative urinary retention or febrile morbidity,
53
and recovered uneventfully with conservative treatments.
54
Conclusion: Transvaginal NOTES is feasible to perform hysterectomy and can
55
undergo procedures hardly completed in conventional vaginal surgery, given that
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
33
4 Lee, Wu & Su et al.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 56
posterior colpotomy is achievable. This procedure was not impeded by the
57
voluminous size of uterus, and was advantaged by the absolution of any abdominal
58
incision.
RI PT
59 60
Keywords: Hysterectomy, laparoscopy, vaginal surgery, natural orifice transluminal
61
endoscopic surgery (NOTES).
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
62
5 Lee, Wu & Su et al.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 63
Introduction Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is a novel concept
65
of using the natural orifices of human bodies to be the surgical channels and avoid
66
visible abdominal scars [1]. Different techniques had been developed such as
67
transcolonic access and per-oral transgastric or transesophageal accesses, however,
68
transvaginal access is the most frequently used approach for NOTES [2].
RI PT
64
The techniques of transvaginal endoscopy have been reported in gynecology
70
[3-6], and termed ‘culdoscopy’ or ‘ventroscopy’ [7] in the past. With the criticisms of
71
restricted visualization and limited operative capabilities, its application diminished
72
after the popularity of abdominal laparoscopy in the 1970s. Transvaginal
73
hydrolaparoscopy (THL) developed later [8-10], this technique was mainly restricted
74
to the diagnostic evaluation of infertility.
M AN U
SC
69
Though conventional vaginal surgeries has been a gynecologic expertise in
76
daily practice, some procedures can only be achieved with palpation in some
77
conditions, such as doing vaginal hysterectomy while the uterus is large or without
78
descensus, or performing concomitant adnexal surgeries. We recently developed a
79
technique of transvaginal NOTES using the wound-retractor-and-glove system [1]
80
and demonstrated that transvaginal NOTES can perform not only adnexal
81
procedures [11, 12], but hysterectomies [13] as well. In our preliminary experience,
82
transvaginal NOTES combines the features of vaginal surgery and the new
83
techniques of single-port laparoscopic surgery, which widened the capability and
84
achievability of conventional vaginal surgery in a variety of circumstances, and
85
yielded a favorable result of scarless abdomen [13]. However, we also noted that
AC C
EP
TE D
75
6 Lee, Wu & Su et al.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
transvaginal procedures are inherently quite different from that of transabdominal
87
approaches. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and to explore
88
the possible limitations of hysterectomy performed with transvaginal NOTES in the
89
daily practice for benign gynecologic disease.
RI PT
86
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
90
7 Lee, Wu & Su et al.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 91
Materials and Methods This study was reviewed and approved by the Human Investigation Review
93
Board of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. All patients who underwent surgical
94
management gave their written informed consents. Experienced gynecologic
95
endoscopists performed all surgeries.
RI PT
92
96 Patients
SC
97
Patients scheduled for laparoscopic hysterectomy from May 2010 to August
99
2011 in Chang Gung Memorial Hospital were prospectively included to perform
100
transvaginal NOTES. Conditions such as obesity (body mass index >30 kg/m2),
101
those who never had vaginal deliveries, those who needed concomitant adnexal
102
surgeries, and those with a history of previous cesarean deliveries or abdominal
103
surgeries were not considered contraindications. However, patients of virginity,
104
suspected with severe pelvic adhesions from prior abdominal surgeries,
105
tubo-ovarian abscesses, or endometriosis were excluded.
TE D
EP
107
Surgical techniques
AC C
106
M AN U
98
108
Previously published surgical techniques [1, 13] are described in brief as the
109
following: Under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation, patients were
110
placed in Trendelenburg position with legs bandaged and supported in the stirrups.
111
One 12-French Foley catheter was indwelled. The operation started as in
112
conventional vaginal surgery with a circumcision of vaginal wall around the cervix
113
and creating a 3-cm posterior colpotomy through the posterior fornix of the vagina.
8 Lee, Wu & Su et al.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Then the uterosacral ligaments were dissected, and the uterine vessels sealed and cut
115
up to the level of isthmus with either suture-ligation or LigaSure system (Valleylab,
116
Boulder, CO) designed for laparotomy. With the exception of several initial patients,
117
anterior colpotomy was achieved first with the complete dissection of peritoneum
118
reflection at bladder base.
RI PT
114
The vaginal port was then established by inserting the inner rim of a small
120
Alexis wound retractor (Applied Medical Resources Corp., Rancho Santa Margarita,
121
CA) around the cervix and fixing from behind the colpotomy wound (Fig 1A), and
122
the outer rim of the wound retractor outside the vagina was draped with the
123
disposable surgical glove in which 3 of the fingers were fixed with 10-mm or 5-mm
124
cannulas (Fig 1B). We used a 5-mm, 30-degree endoscope (KARL STORZ GmbH &
125
Co. KG, Tuttlingen Germany) or a 10-mm conventional endoscope as visual media, a
126
laparoscopic single tooth tenaculum to manipulate the uterus, and a 5-mm LigaSure
127
system (Valleylab, Boulder, CO) designed for laparoscopy as energy source. All
128
other necessary instruments are the ordinary straight ones as are used in the
129
conventional laparoscopy.
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
119
Transvaginal NOTES then began after adequate pneumoperitoneum. For the
131
several initial patients, the vaginal ports were established prior to the opening of the
132
peritoneum reflection at bladder base during the anterior colpotomy, so that the
133
peritoneum could be dissected first under endoscopic guidance. The remaining
134
structures going upward from the isthmic level, including broad ligaments, round
135
ligaments, ovarian ligaments and Fallopian tubes, were then sealed and cut with
136
LigaSure to complete the hysterectomy (Fig 2 A-D). If any adnexal lesions were
AC C
130
9 Lee, Wu & Su et al.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
found, enucleation, salpingectomy or salpingo-oophorectomy was performed
138
whenever appropriate [11]. After taking out the glove with cannulas, the uterus was
139
removed with morcellation through the vagina under the protection of a wound
140
retractor.
RI PT
137
Then, the NOTES resumed by readapting the surgical glove again to ensure
142
hemostasis and to overlook the whole pelvis and abdominal cavity. Finally, the
143
surgery ended after closure of the vaginal cuff and a routine checkup of cystoscopy.
SC
141
144 Treatment protocol
M AN U
145
We gave prophylactic antibiotics preoperatively with a single-dose of
147
parenteral cefazolin, and postoperatively with cefazolin and gentamicin for 24 hours.
148
The Foley catheter was indwelled overnight. According to the regulations of our
149
national insurance, patients could not be discharged until an afebrile status for at
150
least 24 hours, good wound healing, full recovery of urinary and gastrointestinal
151
functions and without evidence of surgical complications. Vaginal intercourse was
152
prohibited within 2 months after operation. Patients returned to our outpatient
153
clinic one week and one month after the surgery for check-up. Three months later,
154
patients were evaluated for general wellbeing and sexual function, including
155
dyspareunia or post-coital bleeding.
AC C
EP
TE D
146
156 157
Data analysis
158
Continuous variables such as age, body mass index (BMI) and uterine weight
159
are presented as mean±SEM, whereas discrete variables such as parity are presented
10 Lee, Wu & Su et al.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
as median value and range. Descriptive statistics were performed using SPSS for
161
Windows, release 17.0.0/2008 (IBM-SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL).
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
160
11 Lee, Wu & Su et al.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 162
Results From May 2010 to August 2011, we enrolled a total of 137 patients who had
164
preoperative benign diseases that required hysterectomy. Their demographics are
165
presented in Table 1. The study population was aged 46.0±0.4 years, the median
166
parity 2, and the mean BMI 24.7±0.4 kg/m2. Eight (5.8%) of the patients were
167
nulliparous, in addition to 26 (19.0%) patients without a history of vaginal deliveries.
168
50 (36.5%) patients had previous abdominal surgeries, including 38 (27.7%) cesarean
169
deliveries, 7 (5.1%) laparotomies, and 5 (3.6%) laparoscopies.
SC
RI PT
163
Hysterectomies with pure transvaginal NOTES was successfully completed in
171
130 (94.9%) of the 137 patients, while 7 (5.1%) patients were converted to
172
conventional laparoscopy. Among the 130 patients, concomitant pelvic surgeries
173
including 3 enucleations, 6 salpingectomies, 8 salpingo-oophorectomies, and 15
174
extensive adhesiolysis, were also carried out successfully purely with transvaginal
175
NOTES. As presented in Table 2, the mean uterine weight in this series was
176
450.0±24.1 gm, in which 39 (30%) patients had weights between 300gm and 500 gm,
177
and 45 (34.6%) patients had weights >500gm. 7 (5.4%) patients had uterine weights
178
>1000gm, up to an extreme value of 1630gm. The mean operation time was 88.2±4.1
179
minutes. Mean blood loss was 257.7±23.9 mL, mean decrease of hemoglobin between
180
pre-operation and the first post-operation day was 1.2±0.1 g/dL, and 10 (7.7%)
181
patients received blood transfusions intraoperatively. Mean post-operative hospital
182
stay was 2.8±0.07 days. The final pathologic reports were leiomyomas and/or
183
adenomyosis, with the exception of one patient with endometrial stromal sarcoma
184
(Table 2).
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
170
12 Lee, Wu & Su et al.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
In the current series, there were 2/137 (1.5%) patients with intraoperative
186
complications and 5/137 (3.6%) patients with a failed attempt of vaginal approach,
187
and all 7 patients were converted to conventional laparoscopy to complete the
188
surgeries, as presented in Table 3. The conversion rate was 5.1% (7/137) on the
189
intention-to-treat basis. As for the intraoperative complications, one patient had an
190
unintended cystotomy at trigone during anterior colpotomy, which was revealed
191
immediately by palpating the Foley balloon through a 1-cm hole of perforation. The
192
operation was then shifted to conventional laparoscopy where the bladder
193
perforation was repaired with primary sutures and an indwelling Foley catheter for
194
7 days. No sequela was noted at the one-month follow up. With another patient, we
195
encountered a profound vaginal bleeding from the regurgitation of a very large
196
uterus, which obscured the operation field that made the transvaginal approach very
197
difficult. Therefore the approach was converted to conventional laparoscopy.
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
185
There were 5 patients with a failed attempt from transvaginal NOTES and we
199
managed with conversion to transabdominal laparoscopy. One nullipara had a very
200
narrow vagina that inhibited the downward traction of the large uterus. Two
201
patients had a large uterine myoma at the lower anterior low corpus that obstructed
202
the way of anterior colpotomy, and another patient had a large intraligamentous
203
uterine myoma at the lower corpus, which also obstructed the way of transvaginal
204
colpotomy. The last case had severe endometriosis in the cul-de-sac, which
205
developed dense adhesions among the uterosacral ligaments and the rectum that
206
obstructed the way of posterior colpotomy.
207
AC C
EP
198
We encountered 5/137 (3.6%) patients with postoperative morbidities, as
13 Lee, Wu & Su et al.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
listed in Table 4. One patient had a difficulty voiding postoperatively. A Foley
209
catheter was indwelled for five days and the voiding function recovered to normal.
210
Four patients were complicated with postoperative febrile morbidity. Of the four,
211
three presented with severe lower abdominal pain, leukocytosis and elevated
212
C-reactive protein one week after discharge and required re-hospitalization for
213
antibiotics treatment. All these patients had negative findings in ultrasonorgaphy
214
and computed tomography, and recovered uneventfully after empiric antibiotics
215
with ceftriaxone and metronidazole for three to seven days. The other febrile patient
216
developed a urinary tract infection one week after discharge. She was re-admitted
217
for hydration, empiric antibiotics for 3 days, and recovered.
SC
M AN U
218
RI PT
208
After a follow-up for up to three months after operation, all patients had good healing of vaginal cuff with normal voiding and sexual functions. All the patients
220
completed with pure transvaginal NOTES were highly satisfied with the absolution
221
of any incisions on their abdominal wall.
AC C
EP
TE D
219
14 Lee, Wu & Su et al.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 222
Discussion The current series proved our concept that hysterectomy performed with
224
transvaginal NOTES [13] is feasible for daily practice, with a success rate of almost
225
95%. Instead of using an additional abdominal port as the so-called hybrid-NOTES
226
[14-16], our method was advantaged by undergoing completely a single-port
227
laparoscopy-like technique through purely vaginal approach, and eliminate any
228
wound in abdominal wall [17].
SC
RI PT
223
We learned in the current series that transvaginal NOTES can be applied to
230
accomplish some difficult procedures in conventional vaginal surgeries, with few
231
exceptions. Conventional vaginal hysterectomy could be prohibited by the enlarged
232
size of uterus, or the condition of undescensus, or by a restricted vaginal space such
233
as in women who never experienced vaginal deliveries. In the current series, the
234
mean weight of the uterine specimen was nearly 460 gm, in which 45 (34.6%)
235
patients had uterine weight > 500gm and 7 of them >1000gm, so that the size and
236
weight of the uterus did not seem to be a hamper. There were also 8 (5.8%) patients
237
of nulliparity and 26 (19.0%) patients never experienced vaginal delivery. However,
238
hysterectomies in the current series could generally be completed uneventfully with
239
transvaginal NOTES in almost all these situations, therefore the restricted vaginal
240
space and uterus without descensus were not contraindications.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
229
241
Besides, adhesiolysis and adnexal procedures in conventional vaginal
242
surgeries were also very difficult because of the limited accessibility in the restricted
243
space. In the current series, 33 of 130 (25.4%) patients were noted with adnexal
244
pathologies or pelvic adhesion. As a result, transvaginal NOTES can feasibly
15 Lee, Wu & Su et al.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
undergo the concurrent salpingectomy, salpingo-oophorectomy, the adhesiolysis,
246
and enucleation of ovarian tumor with suture repair without additional difficulties
247
to hysterectomy per se, as was reported in our previous publication [11]. In addition,
248
delicate hemostasis was achieved by direct vision with laparoscopy before the
249
closure of vaginal wound. Therefore, transvaginal NOTES extended the scope and
250
capability of the conventional vaginal surgery.
RI PT
245
In our experience, one advantage of the transvaginal NOTES for hysterectomy
252
was with a shorter operating time than the abdominal laparoscopic hysterectomy.
253
Obviously we avoided the time of opening and closing the abdominal wound.
254
Besides, because the uterus was directly in traction and handled by the operator and
255
not the assistant, the communication with the assistant for adjusting the uterine
256
position could be spared, which made the progress of the operation more fluent and
257
hence could contribute to the shortening of the operating time.
TE D
M AN U
SC
251
Another advantage of the transvaginal NOTES for hysterectomy is its earlier
259
blockage of the uterine vessels. Since the uterine arteries were supplied at the level
260
of the isthmus, it would be more accessible from the transvaginal approach, which is
261
beneficial especially in situations with a large uterus. Since in most situations, the
262
uterine myoma or adenomyosis was located at uterine corpus and the cervix
263
remained small, the trial to approach uterine arteries from the abdominal route was
264
usually interfered by the voluminous corpus, which sometimes caused more
265
bleeding. However, sealing the uterine vessels transvaginally in these situations was
266
much easier, and with that being achieved at the beginning of the operation made
267
the procedure afterward almost bloodless and efficient. In the current series, we
AC C
EP
258
16 Lee, Wu & Su et al.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 268
found that intraoperative blood loss was less than that of conventional laparoscopic
269
hysterectomy. Further randomized comparative study is needed in the future to
270
prove our observation. There were 10 patients in the current series needing transfusion, all with
272
uterine weight >500 gm, and 4 of them with uterine weight >1000 gm. Though the
273
size of the uterus could be one of the risk factor of transfusion, however, other
274
factors such as the existence of pelvic adhesion, the constrictiveness of pubic arch,
275
the location and shape of myoma, as well as the abundant and engorged vessels on
276
the uterus, etc., could also contribute to increased blood loss. It is hard to conclude a
277
general rule of decreasing intraoperative bleeding in these different situations, but
278
the increase of surgeons' experience in blocking the vessels seemed improving the
279
results. In further analysis of the current series, 4 patients of the transfusion were
280
within the first 10 cases, another 2 were within the subsequent 20 cases, and the
281
other 4 scattered in the later 100 cases. This phenomenon may be a support of the
282
existence of "learning curve".
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
271
However, patients of conversion and transfusion in the current study were
284
different. Only 2 of the 7 patients converted to conventional laparoscopy had
285
transfusion, as presented in Table 3, in which only one for the reason of hemorrhage.
286
That is a case we failured to seal the multiple engorged vessels in a patient with
287
voluminous uterus. Failure to effectively seal these vessels would cause a profound
288
bleeding from the engorged vessels as well as the regurgitation from the large uterus.
289
This in turn resulted in a large accumulation of blood in the transvaginal port and
290
blurred the vision of transvaginal laparoscopy, which induced a vicious cycle of
AC C
283
17 Lee, Wu & Su et al.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 291
longer operating time and more blood loss. In this situation, the surgery would
292
inevitably be converted to the transabdominal approach. We found that the failure of transvaginal NOTES almost arose from the
294
impedance of the transvaginal colpotomy in some way, if not from the
295
intraoperative complications. In the current series, one patient had a very narrow
296
vagina, which made the transvaginal operation nearly impossible. Another patient
297
had bowel adhesions in the cul-de-sac, which was impedance to posterior colpotomy,
298
and necessitated the conversion to transabdominal laparoscopy. Two other patients,
299
each with a large uterine myoma at the lower anterior corpus, had a downward
300
traction of the uterus that simultaneously obstructed the way of anterior cul-de-sac
301
impeded the way of anterior colpotomy. In these situations, transabdominal
302
laparoscopy was much safer and easier than the transvaginal NOTES.
M AN U
SC
RI PT
293
Regarding the follow-up of postoperative patients, we found pelvic infection
304
in 4/130 (3.1%) patients occurring on the average of 10th day after operation, and all
305
these patients were treated recovered uneventfully with parenteral antibiotics. The
306
vagina has been criticized for its lack of asepticism [18, 19], and as these incidences
307
usually happened within the first 20 cases of different surgeons, therefore we
308
hypothesized that the postoperative infections could have possibly arisen from the
309
unskilled techniques of colpotomy or incomplete hemostasis. This issue warrants
310
further investigation while we gain more experience.
AC C
EP
TE D
303
311
Dyspareunia and sexual abstinence are the other two concerns. However,
312
these concerns were universal for all patients undergoing vaginal surgery with
313
vaginal cuff sutures, and not specific for NOTES. In the present series, sexual
18 Lee, Wu & Su et al.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 314
abstinence is routinely recommended for 6 to 8 weeks in our practice for
315
transvaginal NOTES, so no patients in our series had problems with dyspareunia or
316
post-coital bleeding at three-month follow up. In conclusion, hysterectomy is feasible to be performed with transvaginal
318
NOTES. Though there were a few complications in this series, but all were resolved
319
with abdominal conventional laparoscopy uneventfully. The advantages of
320
transvaginal NOTES we learned in the current series are that we always can see
321
clearly under the visual guidance of laparoscope and operate precisely by the handle
322
of endoscopic instruments, in comparisons with that some procedures in the
323
conventional vaginal surgeries can only be achieved with palpation in some
324
conditions. It appears that the only impeding factor of transvaginal NOTES is the
325
obstruction of cul-de-sac to avoid the performance of transvaginal posterior
326
colpotomy, however, once this step was successfully done, the size of the specimen
327
would no more be the impeding factors of the operation process. We also found that
328
performing hysterectomy with transvaginal NOTES was generally beneficial with a
329
short operating time and high patient satisfaction as in the conventional vaginal
330
surgery due to the absence of any abdominal wound.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
317
331
Therefore we suggest that transvaginal NOTES is an ideal approach for
332
hysterectomy in almost all conditions given that transvaginal colpotomy can be
333
achieved. Further comparative studies or even randomized controlled trials should
334
be carried out to confirm its advantages and significance in clinical practice.
335
19 Lee, Wu & Su et al.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Acknowledgements: We thank Lulu Huang, MD for her assistance in editing the manuscript.
337
Disclosure Statement: Drs CY Lee, KY Wu, H Su, PJ Wu, CM Han and CF Yen report no
338
conflict of interest. This study was supported partially by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
339
research grants CMRPG370151 and CMRPG381361. Dr C.-F. Yen is the principal investigator.
RI PT
336
340
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
341
20 Lee, Wu & Su et al.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 342
References
343
1.
Lee CL, Wu KY, Su H, Wu PJ, Han CM, Yen CF. Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) in Gynecology. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2012
345
Nov;1(1 ):23-6, http://www.e-gmit.com/article/S2213-3070(12)00008-1. 2.
347
in humans since white paper. World J Gastroenterol. 2011 Apr 7;17(13):1655-65. 3.
351 352
5.
6.
7.
Ott Dv. Die Beleuchtung der Bauchhohle (Ventroskopie) als Methode bei Vaginaler Coeliotomie. Abl Gynakol. 1902;231:817-23.
8.
359 360
Clyman MJ. A new panculdoscope--diagnostic, photographic, and operative aspects. Obstet Gynecol. 1963 Mar;21:343-8.
357 358
Cheng MC, Khew KS, Chen C, Ratnam SS, Seng KM, Tan WK. Culdoscopic ligation as an outpatient procedure. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1975 May 1;122(1):109-12.
355 356
Peretz A, Sharf M. Culdoscopy in gynecologic diagnosis. A review of 404 cases of endoscopic examination. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1961 Sep;82:582-7.
353 354
SC
4.
TE D
350
May 28;140(4):378-85.
M AN U
349
Decker A. Culdoscopy; its diagnostic value in pelvic disease. J Am Med Assoc. 1949
De Wilde RL. Transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. [Letter].
EP
348
Santos BF, Hungness ES. Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery: progress
2000 Nov;7(4):599-600. 9.
AC C
346
RI PT
344
Darai E, Dessolle L, Lecuru F, Soriano D. Transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy compared
361
with laparoscopy for the evaluation of infertile women: a prospective comparative
362
blind study. Hum Reprod. 2000 Nov;15(11):2379-82.
363
10.
364 365 366
Moore ML, Cohen M, Liu GY. Experience with 109 cases of transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2003 May;10(2):282-5.
11.
Lee CL, Wu KY, Su H, Ueng SH, Yen CF. Transvaginal Natural-Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) in Adnexal Procedures. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012
21 Lee, Wu & Su et al.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 367 368
Jul;19(4):509-13. 12.
Lee CL, Wu KY, Su H, Yen CF, Ueng SH. Regarding "transvaginal single-port natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery". J Minim Invasive Gynecol. [Letter]. 2013
370
Jan;20(1):131-2.
371
13.
RI PT
369
Su H, Yen CF, Wu KY, Han CM, Lee CL. Hysterectomy via transvaginal natural orifice
372
transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): Feasibility of an innovative approach.
373
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jun;51(2):217-21.
375 376
Moen MD, Noone MB, Elser DM. Natural orifice hysterectomy. Int Urogynecol J
SC
14.
Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. [Review]. 2008 Sep;19(9):1189-92. 15.
M AN U
374
Lee D, Dillon B, Lemack G, Gomelsky A, Zimmern P. Transvaginal mesh kits-how
377
"serious" are the complications and are they reversible? Urology. 2013
378
Jan;81(1):43-9.
379
16.
Zorron R, Maggioni LC, Pombo L, Oliveira AL, Carvalho GL, Filgueiras M. NOTES transvaginal cholecystectomy: preliminary clinical application. Surg Endosc. 2008
381
Feb;22(2):542-7.
382
17.
TE D
380
Hackethal A, Sucke J, Oehmke F, Munstedt K, Padberg W, Tinneberg HR. Establishing transvaginal NOTES for gynecological and surgical indications: benefits, limits, and
384
patient experience. Endoscopy. 2010 Oct;42(10):875-8. 18.
386 387
AC C
385
EP
383
Rattner D, Kalloo A. ASGE/SAGES Working Group on Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery. October 2005. Surg Endosc. 2006 Feb;20(2):329-33.
19.
Hazey JW, Narula VK, Renton DB, Reavis KM, Paul CM, Hinshaw KE, et al.
388
Natural-orifice transgastric endoscopic peritoneoscopy in humans: Initial clinical
389
trial. Surg Endosc. 2008 Jan;22(1):16-20.
390 391
22 Lee, Wu & Su et al.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 392
Figure Legends
393 Figure 1. Photograph shows how the portal of transvaginal NOTES was established.
395
(A) The small Alexis wound retractor (Applied Medical Resources Corp., Rancho
396
Santa Margarita, CA) was inserted through and fixed against the colpotomy wound;
397
and (B) a disposable glove attached with three cannulas was draped onto the
398
retractor. The insufflating tube was connected to one of the cannulas to establish
399
pneumoperitoneum.
SC
RI PT
394
M AN U
400
Figure 2. Intraoperative photographs from a representative patient shows some
402
portion of the endoscopic procedures. (A) A laparoscopic tenaculum forceps grasped
403
at the right lower corpus to expose the right ovary; (B) The left ovarian ligament was
404
exposed when the round ligament was partially done by the LigaSure. (C) Selective
405
right salpingectomy can be done with the preservation of ovary. (D) The left
406
tri-pedicle (the tube, ovarian ligament and round ligament) has been separated from
407
the uterus, and hence the uterus could be removed from the colpotomy wound. (Ut:
408
uterus, Ov: ovary, Tu: tube, R: rectum)
AC C
EP
TE D
401
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
46.0 ± 0.4
Parity (median [interqartile range])
2 [1 – 3]
P=0 (Nulliparous), N (%)
8 (5.8)
P>1
129 (94.2)
With vaginal delivery, N (%)
103 (75.2)
Without vaginal delivery, N (%)
26 (19.0)
BMI (Kg/m2, mean±SEM)
24.7 ± 0.4
Previous abdominal surgery, N (%)
Laparotomy, N (%)
3
AC C
2
EP
Laparoscopy, N (%)
50 (36.5)
38 (27.7)
TE D
C-section only, N (%)
SC
Age (years, mean±SEM)
RI PT
Table 1. Patients’ characteristics (N=137)
M AN U
1
7 (5.1) 5 (3.6)
2 Lee & Wu et al.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Table 2. Surgical Outcomes of the 130 patients who completed NOTES (N=130) 88.2±4.1
Estimated blood loss (ml, mean±SEM)
257.7± 23.9
Decrease of hemoglobin (g/dL, mean±SEM)
1.2 ± 0.1
Blood transfusion, N (%)
10 (7.7)
Uterine weight (gm, mean±SEM)
450.0 ± 24.1
Hospital stay (days, mean±SEM))
Enucleation, N (%) Salpingectomy, N (%)
2.8 ± 0.1
M AN U
Concomitant surgeries, N (%)
33 (25.4) 3 (2.3) 6 (4.6) 8 (6.2)
Extensive adhesiolysis, N (%)
15 (11.5)
Posterior colporrhaphy
1 (0.7)
AC C
EP
TE D
Salpingo-oophorectomy, N (%)
Pathologic report
5
RI PT
Operative time (min, mean±SEM)
SC
4
Leiomyoma, N (%)
60 (46.2)
Adenomyosis, N (%)
18 (13.8)
Leiomyoma and adenomyosis, N (%)
51 (39.2)
Endometrial stromal sarcoma, N (%)
1 (0.7)
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 3 Lee & Wu et al.
C/S BMI (times) (kg/m2)
Op indication
Op time (min)
Cases of intraoperative complications and conversion
1
50
2
0
24.0
Myoma
267
2
49
2
0
21.3
Myoma
116
Admy
Blood loss (mL) 1500 150
Cases of failed attempt from transvaginal NOTES and conversion
3
40
2
2
38.4
4
43
2
0
32.4
5 6
42 45
0 2
0 1
20.0 20.0
7
40
2
2
20.8
AC C
800
TE D
202
+ 0.3
Uterine weight (gm)
Length Reasons of failure of stay (day)
Y
1400
3
+ 0.1
N
377
7
+ 0.8
Y
711
4
204
100
- 2.5
N
487
2
168 106
300 200
- 0.8 - 1.9
N N
982 172
3 4
161
500
- 2.9
N
220
3
EP
Myoma Admy Myoma Admy Myoma Myoma Admy Myoma Admy
Hb BT change
SC
Parity
M AN U
Age
RI PT
Table 3. Patients with intra-operative conversions or complications
Massive vaginal bleeding Bladder perforation
Anterior low corpus myoma Broad ligament myoma Narrow vagina Rectum adherent to uterosacral ligament Anterior low corpus myoma
4 Lee & Wu et al.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Table 4. Patients of post-operative complications
Number (% in N=137) 1 (0.7%)
Febrile morbidity, N (%)
4 (2.9%)
Lower abdominal pain, N (%)
3 (2.2%)
Urinary tract infection, N (%)
1 (0.7%)
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
Urinary retention, N (%)
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
http://www.AAGL.org/jmig-21-4-JMIG-D-13-00678
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
http://www.AAGL.org/jmig-21-4-JMIG-D-13-00678