Accepted Manuscript Hysterectomy by Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES): a series of 137 patients Chyi-Long Lee, MD, PhD Kai-Yun Wu, MD Hsuan Su, MD Pei-Ju Wu, MD Chien-Min Han, MD Chih-Feng Yen, MD. PII:

S1553-4650(14)00206-4

DOI:

10.1016/j.jmig.2014.03.011

Reference:

JMIG 2277

To appear in:

The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology

Received Date: 14 December 2013 Revised Date:

13 March 2014

Accepted Date: 13 March 2014

Please cite this article as: Lee CL, Wu KY, Su H, Wu PJ, Han CM, Yen CF, Hysterectomy by Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES): a series of 137 patients, The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology (2014), doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.03.011. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Hysterectomy

by

Transvaginal

Natural

Orifice

Transluminal

2

Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES): a series of 137 patients

3

Chyi-Long Lee, MD, PhD; Kai-Yun Wu, MD; Hsuan Su, MD; Pei-Ju Wu, MD,

4

Chien-Min Han, MD, Chih-Feng Yen, MD.

5

*The first 2 authors (Drs Lee and Wu) contributed equally to the study.

6

From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at

7

Linkou and University (Drs Lee, K-Y Wu, Su, Han, and Yen); the Graduate Institute of

8

Clinical Medical Sciences, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Tao-Yuan (Dr Yen);

9

and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chung Shan Medical University

SC

RI PT

1

Hospital, Taichung (Dr. P-J Wu), Taiwan, Republic of China.

11

Corresponding author: Chih-Feng Yen, MD, Department of Obstetrics and

12

Gynecology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, 5, Fu-Hsin St, Kwei-Shan,

13

Tao-Yuan, Taiwan 33305. Tel: +886-3-1200, E-mail: [email protected]

14

Author contributions: C.-L.L., K.-Y.W., H.S. and C.-F.Y. conceived and designed the

15

study; K.-Y.W., H.S., P.-J. W. and C.-M. H. acquired the data; C.-F. Y. analyzed and

16

interpreted the data; K.-Y.W. and C.-F. Y. drafted the manuscript; C.-L.L. and C.-F.Y.

17

reviewed the data and revised the manuscript critically for scientific and intellectual

18

content. All authors approved the final version for submission.

19

Funding: This study was partially supported by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

20

research grants CMRPG370151 and CMRPG381361. Dr C.-F. Yen is the principal

21

investigator.

22

Financial Disclosure: All authors have no conflict of interest to be declared.

23

Presentation: This study was presented in part at the 42nd Global Congress of

24

Minimally Invasive Gynecology (Annual Meeting of the AAGL), Washington DC,

25

November 10-14, 2013.

26

Running title: Hysterectomy by Purely Transvaginal NOTES

27

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

10

2 Lee, Wu & Su et al.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 28

Précis

29 Transvaginal natural-orifice transluminal laparoscopic surgery (NOTES) is a safe

31

and feasible technique to undergo hysterectomy.

RI PT

30

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

32

3 Lee, Wu & Su et al.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

ABSTRACT

34

Study Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of hysterectomy in benign

35

disease with transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES).

36

Design: Prospective observational study.

37

Setting: Tertiary referral medical center.

38

Patients: From May 2010 to August 2011, consecutive patients who were scheduled

39

for laparoscopic hysterectomy and without virginity or the suspicion of pelvic

40

inflammation, or cul-de-sac obliteration were included.

41

Intervention: Total hysterectomy with transvaginal NOTES.

42

Measurements and Main Results: All included patients were 137, with mean age

43

46.0±0.4 years and BMI 24.7±0.4 kg/m2 ([±SEM]), respectively, and transvaginal

44

NOTES was successfully completed in 130 (94.9%) patients. 15 patients underwent

45

concurrent adhesiolysis and 17 with adnexal procedures. Mean uterine weight was

46

450.0±24.1 gm, where 45 (34.6%) patients had weights >500gm, and 7 (5.4%) patients

47

>1000gm. Mean operative time was 88.2±4.1 minutes, with mean blood loss

48

257.7±23.9 mL. Two patients encountered intraoperative hemorrhage or unintended

49

cystotomy, another 5 with failure of transvaginal colpotomy due to a very narrow

50

vagina, cul-de-sac obliateration by bowel adhesions, or mass obstruction, and all

51

these 7 (5.1%) patients were successfully dealt with transabdominal laparoscopy.

52

Five (3.6%) patients experienced postoperative urinary retention or febrile morbidity,

53

and recovered uneventfully with conservative treatments.

54

Conclusion: Transvaginal NOTES is feasible to perform hysterectomy and can

55

undergo procedures hardly completed in conventional vaginal surgery, given that

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

33

4 Lee, Wu & Su et al.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 56

posterior colpotomy is achievable. This procedure was not impeded by the

57

voluminous size of uterus, and was advantaged by the absolution of any abdominal

58

incision.

RI PT

59 60

Keywords: Hysterectomy, laparoscopy, vaginal surgery, natural orifice transluminal

61

endoscopic surgery (NOTES).

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

62

5 Lee, Wu & Su et al.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 63

Introduction Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is a novel concept

65

of using the natural orifices of human bodies to be the surgical channels and avoid

66

visible abdominal scars [1]. Different techniques had been developed such as

67

transcolonic access and per-oral transgastric or transesophageal accesses, however,

68

transvaginal access is the most frequently used approach for NOTES [2].

RI PT

64

The techniques of transvaginal endoscopy have been reported in gynecology

70

[3-6], and termed ‘culdoscopy’ or ‘ventroscopy’ [7] in the past. With the criticisms of

71

restricted visualization and limited operative capabilities, its application diminished

72

after the popularity of abdominal laparoscopy in the 1970s. Transvaginal

73

hydrolaparoscopy (THL) developed later [8-10], this technique was mainly restricted

74

to the diagnostic evaluation of infertility.

M AN U

SC

69

Though conventional vaginal surgeries has been a gynecologic expertise in

76

daily practice, some procedures can only be achieved with palpation in some

77

conditions, such as doing vaginal hysterectomy while the uterus is large or without

78

descensus, or performing concomitant adnexal surgeries. We recently developed a

79

technique of transvaginal NOTES using the wound-retractor-and-glove system [1]

80

and demonstrated that transvaginal NOTES can perform not only adnexal

81

procedures [11, 12], but hysterectomies [13] as well. In our preliminary experience,

82

transvaginal NOTES combines the features of vaginal surgery and the new

83

techniques of single-port laparoscopic surgery, which widened the capability and

84

achievability of conventional vaginal surgery in a variety of circumstances, and

85

yielded a favorable result of scarless abdomen [13]. However, we also noted that

AC C

EP

TE D

75

6 Lee, Wu & Su et al.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

transvaginal procedures are inherently quite different from that of transabdominal

87

approaches. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and to explore

88

the possible limitations of hysterectomy performed with transvaginal NOTES in the

89

daily practice for benign gynecologic disease.

RI PT

86

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

90

7 Lee, Wu & Su et al.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 91

Materials and Methods This study was reviewed and approved by the Human Investigation Review

93

Board of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. All patients who underwent surgical

94

management gave their written informed consents. Experienced gynecologic

95

endoscopists performed all surgeries.

RI PT

92

96 Patients

SC

97

Patients scheduled for laparoscopic hysterectomy from May 2010 to August

99

2011 in Chang Gung Memorial Hospital were prospectively included to perform

100

transvaginal NOTES. Conditions such as obesity (body mass index >30 kg/m2),

101

those who never had vaginal deliveries, those who needed concomitant adnexal

102

surgeries, and those with a history of previous cesarean deliveries or abdominal

103

surgeries were not considered contraindications. However, patients of virginity,

104

suspected with severe pelvic adhesions from prior abdominal surgeries,

105

tubo-ovarian abscesses, or endometriosis were excluded.

TE D

EP

107

Surgical techniques

AC C

106

M AN U

98

108

Previously published surgical techniques [1, 13] are described in brief as the

109

following: Under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation, patients were

110

placed in Trendelenburg position with legs bandaged and supported in the stirrups.

111

One 12-French Foley catheter was indwelled. The operation started as in

112

conventional vaginal surgery with a circumcision of vaginal wall around the cervix

113

and creating a 3-cm posterior colpotomy through the posterior fornix of the vagina.

8 Lee, Wu & Su et al.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Then the uterosacral ligaments were dissected, and the uterine vessels sealed and cut

115

up to the level of isthmus with either suture-ligation or LigaSure system (Valleylab,

116

Boulder, CO) designed for laparotomy. With the exception of several initial patients,

117

anterior colpotomy was achieved first with the complete dissection of peritoneum

118

reflection at bladder base.

RI PT

114

The vaginal port was then established by inserting the inner rim of a small

120

Alexis wound retractor (Applied Medical Resources Corp., Rancho Santa Margarita,

121

CA) around the cervix and fixing from behind the colpotomy wound (Fig 1A), and

122

the outer rim of the wound retractor outside the vagina was draped with the

123

disposable surgical glove in which 3 of the fingers were fixed with 10-mm or 5-mm

124

cannulas (Fig 1B). We used a 5-mm, 30-degree endoscope (KARL STORZ GmbH &

125

Co. KG, Tuttlingen Germany) or a 10-mm conventional endoscope as visual media, a

126

laparoscopic single tooth tenaculum to manipulate the uterus, and a 5-mm LigaSure

127

system (Valleylab, Boulder, CO) designed for laparoscopy as energy source. All

128

other necessary instruments are the ordinary straight ones as are used in the

129

conventional laparoscopy.

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

119

Transvaginal NOTES then began after adequate pneumoperitoneum. For the

131

several initial patients, the vaginal ports were established prior to the opening of the

132

peritoneum reflection at bladder base during the anterior colpotomy, so that the

133

peritoneum could be dissected first under endoscopic guidance. The remaining

134

structures going upward from the isthmic level, including broad ligaments, round

135

ligaments, ovarian ligaments and Fallopian tubes, were then sealed and cut with

136

LigaSure to complete the hysterectomy (Fig 2 A-D). If any adnexal lesions were

AC C

130

9 Lee, Wu & Su et al.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

found, enucleation, salpingectomy or salpingo-oophorectomy was performed

138

whenever appropriate [11]. After taking out the glove with cannulas, the uterus was

139

removed with morcellation through the vagina under the protection of a wound

140

retractor.

RI PT

137

Then, the NOTES resumed by readapting the surgical glove again to ensure

142

hemostasis and to overlook the whole pelvis and abdominal cavity. Finally, the

143

surgery ended after closure of the vaginal cuff and a routine checkup of cystoscopy.

SC

141

144 Treatment protocol

M AN U

145

We gave prophylactic antibiotics preoperatively with a single-dose of

147

parenteral cefazolin, and postoperatively with cefazolin and gentamicin for 24 hours.

148

The Foley catheter was indwelled overnight. According to the regulations of our

149

national insurance, patients could not be discharged until an afebrile status for at

150

least 24 hours, good wound healing, full recovery of urinary and gastrointestinal

151

functions and without evidence of surgical complications. Vaginal intercourse was

152

prohibited within 2 months after operation. Patients returned to our outpatient

153

clinic one week and one month after the surgery for check-up. Three months later,

154

patients were evaluated for general wellbeing and sexual function, including

155

dyspareunia or post-coital bleeding.

AC C

EP

TE D

146

156 157

Data analysis

158

Continuous variables such as age, body mass index (BMI) and uterine weight

159

are presented as mean±SEM, whereas discrete variables such as parity are presented

10 Lee, Wu & Su et al.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

as median value and range. Descriptive statistics were performed using SPSS for

161

Windows, release 17.0.0/2008 (IBM-SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL).

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

160

11 Lee, Wu & Su et al.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 162

Results From May 2010 to August 2011, we enrolled a total of 137 patients who had

164

preoperative benign diseases that required hysterectomy. Their demographics are

165

presented in Table 1. The study population was aged 46.0±0.4 years, the median

166

parity 2, and the mean BMI 24.7±0.4 kg/m2. Eight (5.8%) of the patients were

167

nulliparous, in addition to 26 (19.0%) patients without a history of vaginal deliveries.

168

50 (36.5%) patients had previous abdominal surgeries, including 38 (27.7%) cesarean

169

deliveries, 7 (5.1%) laparotomies, and 5 (3.6%) laparoscopies.

SC

RI PT

163

Hysterectomies with pure transvaginal NOTES was successfully completed in

171

130 (94.9%) of the 137 patients, while 7 (5.1%) patients were converted to

172

conventional laparoscopy. Among the 130 patients, concomitant pelvic surgeries

173

including 3 enucleations, 6 salpingectomies, 8 salpingo-oophorectomies, and 15

174

extensive adhesiolysis, were also carried out successfully purely with transvaginal

175

NOTES. As presented in Table 2, the mean uterine weight in this series was

176

450.0±24.1 gm, in which 39 (30%) patients had weights between 300gm and 500 gm,

177

and 45 (34.6%) patients had weights >500gm. 7 (5.4%) patients had uterine weights

178

>1000gm, up to an extreme value of 1630gm. The mean operation time was 88.2±4.1

179

minutes. Mean blood loss was 257.7±23.9 mL, mean decrease of hemoglobin between

180

pre-operation and the first post-operation day was 1.2±0.1 g/dL, and 10 (7.7%)

181

patients received blood transfusions intraoperatively. Mean post-operative hospital

182

stay was 2.8±0.07 days. The final pathologic reports were leiomyomas and/or

183

adenomyosis, with the exception of one patient with endometrial stromal sarcoma

184

(Table 2).

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

170

12 Lee, Wu & Su et al.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

In the current series, there were 2/137 (1.5%) patients with intraoperative

186

complications and 5/137 (3.6%) patients with a failed attempt of vaginal approach,

187

and all 7 patients were converted to conventional laparoscopy to complete the

188

surgeries, as presented in Table 3. The conversion rate was 5.1% (7/137) on the

189

intention-to-treat basis. As for the intraoperative complications, one patient had an

190

unintended cystotomy at trigone during anterior colpotomy, which was revealed

191

immediately by palpating the Foley balloon through a 1-cm hole of perforation. The

192

operation was then shifted to conventional laparoscopy where the bladder

193

perforation was repaired with primary sutures and an indwelling Foley catheter for

194

7 days. No sequela was noted at the one-month follow up. With another patient, we

195

encountered a profound vaginal bleeding from the regurgitation of a very large

196

uterus, which obscured the operation field that made the transvaginal approach very

197

difficult. Therefore the approach was converted to conventional laparoscopy.

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

185

There were 5 patients with a failed attempt from transvaginal NOTES and we

199

managed with conversion to transabdominal laparoscopy. One nullipara had a very

200

narrow vagina that inhibited the downward traction of the large uterus. Two

201

patients had a large uterine myoma at the lower anterior low corpus that obstructed

202

the way of anterior colpotomy, and another patient had a large intraligamentous

203

uterine myoma at the lower corpus, which also obstructed the way of transvaginal

204

colpotomy. The last case had severe endometriosis in the cul-de-sac, which

205

developed dense adhesions among the uterosacral ligaments and the rectum that

206

obstructed the way of posterior colpotomy.

207

AC C

EP

198

We encountered 5/137 (3.6%) patients with postoperative morbidities, as

13 Lee, Wu & Su et al.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

listed in Table 4. One patient had a difficulty voiding postoperatively. A Foley

209

catheter was indwelled for five days and the voiding function recovered to normal.

210

Four patients were complicated with postoperative febrile morbidity. Of the four,

211

three presented with severe lower abdominal pain, leukocytosis and elevated

212

C-reactive protein one week after discharge and required re-hospitalization for

213

antibiotics treatment. All these patients had negative findings in ultrasonorgaphy

214

and computed tomography, and recovered uneventfully after empiric antibiotics

215

with ceftriaxone and metronidazole for three to seven days. The other febrile patient

216

developed a urinary tract infection one week after discharge. She was re-admitted

217

for hydration, empiric antibiotics for 3 days, and recovered.

SC

M AN U

218

RI PT

208

After a follow-up for up to three months after operation, all patients had good healing of vaginal cuff with normal voiding and sexual functions. All the patients

220

completed with pure transvaginal NOTES were highly satisfied with the absolution

221

of any incisions on their abdominal wall.

AC C

EP

TE D

219

14 Lee, Wu & Su et al.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 222

Discussion The current series proved our concept that hysterectomy performed with

224

transvaginal NOTES [13] is feasible for daily practice, with a success rate of almost

225

95%. Instead of using an additional abdominal port as the so-called hybrid-NOTES

226

[14-16], our method was advantaged by undergoing completely a single-port

227

laparoscopy-like technique through purely vaginal approach, and eliminate any

228

wound in abdominal wall [17].

SC

RI PT

223

We learned in the current series that transvaginal NOTES can be applied to

230

accomplish some difficult procedures in conventional vaginal surgeries, with few

231

exceptions. Conventional vaginal hysterectomy could be prohibited by the enlarged

232

size of uterus, or the condition of undescensus, or by a restricted vaginal space such

233

as in women who never experienced vaginal deliveries. In the current series, the

234

mean weight of the uterine specimen was nearly 460 gm, in which 45 (34.6%)

235

patients had uterine weight > 500gm and 7 of them >1000gm, so that the size and

236

weight of the uterus did not seem to be a hamper. There were also 8 (5.8%) patients

237

of nulliparity and 26 (19.0%) patients never experienced vaginal delivery. However,

238

hysterectomies in the current series could generally be completed uneventfully with

239

transvaginal NOTES in almost all these situations, therefore the restricted vaginal

240

space and uterus without descensus were not contraindications.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

229

241

Besides, adhesiolysis and adnexal procedures in conventional vaginal

242

surgeries were also very difficult because of the limited accessibility in the restricted

243

space. In the current series, 33 of 130 (25.4%) patients were noted with adnexal

244

pathologies or pelvic adhesion. As a result, transvaginal NOTES can feasibly

15 Lee, Wu & Su et al.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

undergo the concurrent salpingectomy, salpingo-oophorectomy, the adhesiolysis,

246

and enucleation of ovarian tumor with suture repair without additional difficulties

247

to hysterectomy per se, as was reported in our previous publication [11]. In addition,

248

delicate hemostasis was achieved by direct vision with laparoscopy before the

249

closure of vaginal wound. Therefore, transvaginal NOTES extended the scope and

250

capability of the conventional vaginal surgery.

RI PT

245

In our experience, one advantage of the transvaginal NOTES for hysterectomy

252

was with a shorter operating time than the abdominal laparoscopic hysterectomy.

253

Obviously we avoided the time of opening and closing the abdominal wound.

254

Besides, because the uterus was directly in traction and handled by the operator and

255

not the assistant, the communication with the assistant for adjusting the uterine

256

position could be spared, which made the progress of the operation more fluent and

257

hence could contribute to the shortening of the operating time.

TE D

M AN U

SC

251

Another advantage of the transvaginal NOTES for hysterectomy is its earlier

259

blockage of the uterine vessels. Since the uterine arteries were supplied at the level

260

of the isthmus, it would be more accessible from the transvaginal approach, which is

261

beneficial especially in situations with a large uterus. Since in most situations, the

262

uterine myoma or adenomyosis was located at uterine corpus and the cervix

263

remained small, the trial to approach uterine arteries from the abdominal route was

264

usually interfered by the voluminous corpus, which sometimes caused more

265

bleeding. However, sealing the uterine vessels transvaginally in these situations was

266

much easier, and with that being achieved at the beginning of the operation made

267

the procedure afterward almost bloodless and efficient. In the current series, we

AC C

EP

258

16 Lee, Wu & Su et al.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 268

found that intraoperative blood loss was less than that of conventional laparoscopic

269

hysterectomy. Further randomized comparative study is needed in the future to

270

prove our observation. There were 10 patients in the current series needing transfusion, all with

272

uterine weight >500 gm, and 4 of them with uterine weight >1000 gm. Though the

273

size of the uterus could be one of the risk factor of transfusion, however, other

274

factors such as the existence of pelvic adhesion, the constrictiveness of pubic arch,

275

the location and shape of myoma, as well as the abundant and engorged vessels on

276

the uterus, etc., could also contribute to increased blood loss. It is hard to conclude a

277

general rule of decreasing intraoperative bleeding in these different situations, but

278

the increase of surgeons' experience in blocking the vessels seemed improving the

279

results. In further analysis of the current series, 4 patients of the transfusion were

280

within the first 10 cases, another 2 were within the subsequent 20 cases, and the

281

other 4 scattered in the later 100 cases. This phenomenon may be a support of the

282

existence of "learning curve".

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

271

However, patients of conversion and transfusion in the current study were

284

different. Only 2 of the 7 patients converted to conventional laparoscopy had

285

transfusion, as presented in Table 3, in which only one for the reason of hemorrhage.

286

That is a case we failured to seal the multiple engorged vessels in a patient with

287

voluminous uterus. Failure to effectively seal these vessels would cause a profound

288

bleeding from the engorged vessels as well as the regurgitation from the large uterus.

289

This in turn resulted in a large accumulation of blood in the transvaginal port and

290

blurred the vision of transvaginal laparoscopy, which induced a vicious cycle of

AC C

283

17 Lee, Wu & Su et al.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 291

longer operating time and more blood loss. In this situation, the surgery would

292

inevitably be converted to the transabdominal approach. We found that the failure of transvaginal NOTES almost arose from the

294

impedance of the transvaginal colpotomy in some way, if not from the

295

intraoperative complications. In the current series, one patient had a very narrow

296

vagina, which made the transvaginal operation nearly impossible. Another patient

297

had bowel adhesions in the cul-de-sac, which was impedance to posterior colpotomy,

298

and necessitated the conversion to transabdominal laparoscopy. Two other patients,

299

each with a large uterine myoma at the lower anterior corpus, had a downward

300

traction of the uterus that simultaneously obstructed the way of anterior cul-de-sac

301

impeded the way of anterior colpotomy. In these situations, transabdominal

302

laparoscopy was much safer and easier than the transvaginal NOTES.

M AN U

SC

RI PT

293

Regarding the follow-up of postoperative patients, we found pelvic infection

304

in 4/130 (3.1%) patients occurring on the average of 10th day after operation, and all

305

these patients were treated recovered uneventfully with parenteral antibiotics. The

306

vagina has been criticized for its lack of asepticism [18, 19], and as these incidences

307

usually happened within the first 20 cases of different surgeons, therefore we

308

hypothesized that the postoperative infections could have possibly arisen from the

309

unskilled techniques of colpotomy or incomplete hemostasis. This issue warrants

310

further investigation while we gain more experience.

AC C

EP

TE D

303

311

Dyspareunia and sexual abstinence are the other two concerns. However,

312

these concerns were universal for all patients undergoing vaginal surgery with

313

vaginal cuff sutures, and not specific for NOTES. In the present series, sexual

18 Lee, Wu & Su et al.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 314

abstinence is routinely recommended for 6 to 8 weeks in our practice for

315

transvaginal NOTES, so no patients in our series had problems with dyspareunia or

316

post-coital bleeding at three-month follow up. In conclusion, hysterectomy is feasible to be performed with transvaginal

318

NOTES. Though there were a few complications in this series, but all were resolved

319

with abdominal conventional laparoscopy uneventfully. The advantages of

320

transvaginal NOTES we learned in the current series are that we always can see

321

clearly under the visual guidance of laparoscope and operate precisely by the handle

322

of endoscopic instruments, in comparisons with that some procedures in the

323

conventional vaginal surgeries can only be achieved with palpation in some

324

conditions. It appears that the only impeding factor of transvaginal NOTES is the

325

obstruction of cul-de-sac to avoid the performance of transvaginal posterior

326

colpotomy, however, once this step was successfully done, the size of the specimen

327

would no more be the impeding factors of the operation process. We also found that

328

performing hysterectomy with transvaginal NOTES was generally beneficial with a

329

short operating time and high patient satisfaction as in the conventional vaginal

330

surgery due to the absence of any abdominal wound.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

317

331

Therefore we suggest that transvaginal NOTES is an ideal approach for

332

hysterectomy in almost all conditions given that transvaginal colpotomy can be

333

achieved. Further comparative studies or even randomized controlled trials should

334

be carried out to confirm its advantages and significance in clinical practice.

335

19 Lee, Wu & Su et al.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Acknowledgements: We thank Lulu Huang, MD for her assistance in editing the manuscript.

337

Disclosure Statement: Drs CY Lee, KY Wu, H Su, PJ Wu, CM Han and CF Yen report no

338

conflict of interest. This study was supported partially by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

339

research grants CMRPG370151 and CMRPG381361. Dr C.-F. Yen is the principal investigator.

RI PT

336

340

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

341

20 Lee, Wu & Su et al.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 342

References

343

1.

Lee CL, Wu KY, Su H, Wu PJ, Han CM, Yen CF. Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) in Gynecology. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2012

345

Nov;1(1 ):23-6, http://www.e-gmit.com/article/S2213-3070(12)00008-1. 2.

347

in humans since white paper. World J Gastroenterol. 2011 Apr 7;17(13):1655-65. 3.

351 352

5.

6.

7.

Ott Dv. Die Beleuchtung der Bauchhohle (Ventroskopie) als Methode bei Vaginaler Coeliotomie. Abl Gynakol. 1902;231:817-23.

8.

359 360

Clyman MJ. A new panculdoscope--diagnostic, photographic, and operative aspects. Obstet Gynecol. 1963 Mar;21:343-8.

357 358

Cheng MC, Khew KS, Chen C, Ratnam SS, Seng KM, Tan WK. Culdoscopic ligation as an outpatient procedure. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1975 May 1;122(1):109-12.

355 356

Peretz A, Sharf M. Culdoscopy in gynecologic diagnosis. A review of 404 cases of endoscopic examination. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1961 Sep;82:582-7.

353 354

SC

4.

TE D

350

May 28;140(4):378-85.

M AN U

349

Decker A. Culdoscopy; its diagnostic value in pelvic disease. J Am Med Assoc. 1949

De Wilde RL. Transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. [Letter].

EP

348

Santos BF, Hungness ES. Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery: progress

2000 Nov;7(4):599-600. 9.

AC C

346

RI PT

344

Darai E, Dessolle L, Lecuru F, Soriano D. Transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy compared

361

with laparoscopy for the evaluation of infertile women: a prospective comparative

362

blind study. Hum Reprod. 2000 Nov;15(11):2379-82.

363

10.

364 365 366

Moore ML, Cohen M, Liu GY. Experience with 109 cases of transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2003 May;10(2):282-5.

11.

Lee CL, Wu KY, Su H, Ueng SH, Yen CF. Transvaginal Natural-Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) in Adnexal Procedures. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012

21 Lee, Wu & Su et al.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 367 368

Jul;19(4):509-13. 12.

Lee CL, Wu KY, Su H, Yen CF, Ueng SH. Regarding "transvaginal single-port natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery". J Minim Invasive Gynecol. [Letter]. 2013

370

Jan;20(1):131-2.

371

13.

RI PT

369

Su H, Yen CF, Wu KY, Han CM, Lee CL. Hysterectomy via transvaginal natural orifice

372

transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): Feasibility of an innovative approach.

373

Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jun;51(2):217-21.

375 376

Moen MD, Noone MB, Elser DM. Natural orifice hysterectomy. Int Urogynecol J

SC

14.

Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. [Review]. 2008 Sep;19(9):1189-92. 15.

M AN U

374

Lee D, Dillon B, Lemack G, Gomelsky A, Zimmern P. Transvaginal mesh kits-how

377

"serious" are the complications and are they reversible? Urology. 2013

378

Jan;81(1):43-9.

379

16.

Zorron R, Maggioni LC, Pombo L, Oliveira AL, Carvalho GL, Filgueiras M. NOTES transvaginal cholecystectomy: preliminary clinical application. Surg Endosc. 2008

381

Feb;22(2):542-7.

382

17.

TE D

380

Hackethal A, Sucke J, Oehmke F, Munstedt K, Padberg W, Tinneberg HR. Establishing transvaginal NOTES for gynecological and surgical indications: benefits, limits, and

384

patient experience. Endoscopy. 2010 Oct;42(10):875-8. 18.

386 387

AC C

385

EP

383

Rattner D, Kalloo A. ASGE/SAGES Working Group on Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery. October 2005. Surg Endosc. 2006 Feb;20(2):329-33.

19.

Hazey JW, Narula VK, Renton DB, Reavis KM, Paul CM, Hinshaw KE, et al.

388

Natural-orifice transgastric endoscopic peritoneoscopy in humans: Initial clinical

389

trial. Surg Endosc. 2008 Jan;22(1):16-20.

390 391

22 Lee, Wu & Su et al.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 392

Figure Legends

393 Figure 1. Photograph shows how the portal of transvaginal NOTES was established.

395

(A) The small Alexis wound retractor (Applied Medical Resources Corp., Rancho

396

Santa Margarita, CA) was inserted through and fixed against the colpotomy wound;

397

and (B) a disposable glove attached with three cannulas was draped onto the

398

retractor. The insufflating tube was connected to one of the cannulas to establish

399

pneumoperitoneum.

SC

RI PT

394

M AN U

400

Figure 2. Intraoperative photographs from a representative patient shows some

402

portion of the endoscopic procedures. (A) A laparoscopic tenaculum forceps grasped

403

at the right lower corpus to expose the right ovary; (B) The left ovarian ligament was

404

exposed when the round ligament was partially done by the LigaSure. (C) Selective

405

right salpingectomy can be done with the preservation of ovary. (D) The left

406

tri-pedicle (the tube, ovarian ligament and round ligament) has been separated from

407

the uterus, and hence the uterus could be removed from the colpotomy wound. (Ut:

408

uterus, Ov: ovary, Tu: tube, R: rectum)

AC C

EP

TE D

401

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

46.0 ± 0.4

Parity (median [interqartile range])

2 [1 – 3]

P=0 (Nulliparous), N (%)

8 (5.8)

P>1

129 (94.2)

With vaginal delivery, N (%)

103 (75.2)

Without vaginal delivery, N (%)

26 (19.0)

BMI (Kg/m2, mean±SEM)

24.7 ± 0.4

Previous abdominal surgery, N (%)

Laparotomy, N (%)

3

AC C

2

EP

Laparoscopy, N (%)

50 (36.5)

38 (27.7)

TE D

C-section only, N (%)

SC

Age (years, mean±SEM)

RI PT

Table 1. Patients’ characteristics (N=137)

M AN U

1

7 (5.1) 5 (3.6)

2 Lee & Wu et al.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Table 2. Surgical Outcomes of the 130 patients who completed NOTES (N=130) 88.2±4.1

Estimated blood loss (ml, mean±SEM)

257.7± 23.9

Decrease of hemoglobin (g/dL, mean±SEM)

1.2 ± 0.1

Blood transfusion, N (%)

10 (7.7)

Uterine weight (gm, mean±SEM)

450.0 ± 24.1

Hospital stay (days, mean±SEM))

Enucleation, N (%) Salpingectomy, N (%)

2.8 ± 0.1

M AN U

Concomitant surgeries, N (%)

33 (25.4) 3 (2.3) 6 (4.6) 8 (6.2)

Extensive adhesiolysis, N (%)

15 (11.5)

Posterior colporrhaphy

1 (0.7)

AC C

EP

TE D

Salpingo-oophorectomy, N (%)

Pathologic report

5

RI PT

Operative time (min, mean±SEM)

SC

4

Leiomyoma, N (%)

60 (46.2)

Adenomyosis, N (%)

18 (13.8)

Leiomyoma and adenomyosis, N (%)

51 (39.2)

Endometrial stromal sarcoma, N (%)

1 (0.7)

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 3 Lee & Wu et al.

C/S BMI (times) (kg/m2)

Op indication

Op time (min)



Cases of intraoperative complications and conversion

1

50

2

0

24.0

Myoma

267

2

49

2

0

21.3

Myoma

116

Admy

Blood loss (mL) 1500 150



Cases of failed attempt from transvaginal NOTES and conversion

3

40

2

2

38.4

4

43

2

0

32.4

5 6

42 45

0 2

0 1

20.0 20.0

7

40

2

2

20.8

AC C

800

TE D

202

+ 0.3

Uterine weight (gm)

Length Reasons of failure of stay (day)

Y

1400

3

+ 0.1

N

377

7

+ 0.8

Y

711

4

204

100

- 2.5

N

487

2

168 106

300 200

- 0.8 - 1.9

N N

982 172

3 4

161

500

- 2.9

N

220

3

EP

Myoma Admy Myoma Admy Myoma Myoma Admy Myoma Admy

Hb BT change

SC

Parity

M AN U

Age

RI PT

Table 3. Patients with intra-operative conversions or complications

Massive vaginal bleeding Bladder perforation

Anterior low corpus myoma Broad ligament myoma Narrow vagina Rectum adherent to uterosacral ligament Anterior low corpus myoma

4 Lee & Wu et al.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Table 4. Patients of post-operative complications

Number (% in N=137) 1 (0.7%)

Febrile morbidity, N (%)

4 (2.9%)

Lower abdominal pain, N (%)

3 (2.2%)

Urinary tract infection, N (%)

1 (0.7%)

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

Urinary retention, N (%)

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

http://www.AAGL.org/jmig-21-4-JMIG-D-13-00678

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

http://www.AAGL.org/jmig-21-4-JMIG-D-13-00678

Hysterectomy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): a series of 137 patients.

To evaluate the feasibility and safety of hysterectomy in benign disease using transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES)...
324KB Sizes 0 Downloads 3 Views