Can. J. Microbiol. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA on 09/02/14 For personal use only. This Just-IN manuscript is the accepted manuscript prior to copy editing and page composition. It may differ from the final official version of record.

Page 1 of 34

1

IAA-producing rhizobacteria from chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) induce changes in root

2

architecture and increase root biomass†

3 4

Fierro-Coronado, Rosario Aliciaa,1; Quiroz-Figueroa, Francisco Robertoa,1; García-Pérez,

5

Luz Maríaa; Ramírez-Chávez, Enriqueb; Molina-Torres, Jorgeb and Maldonado-Mendoza,

6

Ignacio Eduardoa,*

7 8

a

9

el Desarrollo Integral Regional Unidad Sinaloa, Instituto Politécnico Nacional (CIIDIR-

Departamento de Biotecnología Agrícola, Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigación para

10

IPN Unidad Sinaloa ). Blvd. Juan de Dios Bátiz Paredes No. 250, Col. San Joachin,

11

Guasave Sinaloa, México C.P. 81100

12

b

13

Politécnico Nacional. Irapuato, Guanajuato, México

14

1

15

E-mails: RAFC ([email protected]), FRQF ([email protected]), LMGP

16

([email protected]), ERC ([email protected]), JMT

17

([email protected]) and IEMM ([email protected])

18

*Corresponding author.

19

Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigación para el Desarrollo Integral Regional Unidad

20

Sinaloa, Instituto Politécnico Nacional (CIIDIR IPN - Unidad Sinaloa). Blvd. Juan de Dios

21

Bátiz Paredes No. 250, Col. San Joachin, Guasave Sinaloa, México C.P. 81100. Phone (52)

22

687 872 9626 ext. 87652, Fax (52) 6878729626. [email protected]

23

† We dedicate this paper in memoriam to Juan Cristóbal Pérez-Carranza, head of PURP and

24

the person who promoted the present work.

Departamento de Biotecnología y Bioquímica, CINVESTAV-Irapuato, Instituto

These authors contributed equally to this work.

1

Can. J. Microbiol. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA on 09/02/14 For personal use only. This Just-IN manuscript is the accepted manuscript prior to copy editing and page composition. It may differ from the final official version of record.

Page 2 of 34

25 26

ABSTRACT

27

Rhizobacteria promote and have beneficial effects on plant growth, making them useful to

28

agriculture. Nevertheless, the rhizosphere of the chickpea plant has not been extensively

29

examined. The aim of the present study was to select indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) producing

30

rhizobacteria from the rhizosphere of chickpea plants for their potential use as

31

biofertilizers. After obtaining a collection of 864 bacterial isolates, we performed an screen

32

using the Salkowski reaction for the presence of auxin compounds (such as IAA) in

33

bacterial LB supernatant (BLBS). Our results demonstrate that the Salkowski reaction has a

34

greater specificity for IAA detection than other tested auxins. Ten bacterial isolates

35

displaying a wide range of auxin accumulation were selected, which produced IAA levels

36

from 5 to 90 µM (according to the Salkowski reaction). Bacterial isolates were identified on

37

the basis of 16S rDNA partial sequences: nine isolates belonged to Enterobacter and one

38

was classified as Serratia. The effect of BLBS on root morphology was evaluated in

39

Arabidopsis thaliana. IAA production by rhizobacteria was confirmed by means of a

40

DR5::GFP construct that is responsive to IAA, and also by HPLC-GC/MS. Finally, we

41

observed that IAA secreted by rhizobacteria: 1) modified the root architecture of

42

Arabidopsis thaliana; 2) caused an increase in chickpea root biomass; and 3) activated the

43

GFP reporter gene driven by the DR5 promoter. These findings provide evidence that these

44

novel bacterial isolates may be considered as putative PGPRs modifying root architecture

45

and increasing root biomass.

46 47

Keywords

48

Rhizobacteria; Cicer arietinum; chickpea; root morphology; indole-3-acetic acid (IAA). 2

Can. J. Microbiol. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA on 09/02/14 For personal use only. This Just-IN manuscript is the accepted manuscript prior to copy editing and page composition. It may differ from the final official version of record.

Page 3 of 34

49 50 51

INTRODUCTION Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) was one of the first cultivated legumes, and is now

52

the third most important legume in the world. India, Australia, Pakistan, Turkey and

53

Myanmar account for 88% of its worldwide production (Food and Agriculture

54

Organization 2013). Chickpea is regarded as a good source of plant proteins, carbohydrates

55

and vitamins for humans (Jukanti et al. 2012), and it is also used as feed for livestock

56

(Soltero-Díaz et al. 2008). It is widely grown in soils with poor moisture status, due to its

57

minimum management requirements (Upadhyaya et al. 2011).

58

Organic matter is required for a good chickpea crop production, as it prevents loss

59

of nutrients by retaining and making them available for plant use (Reeves 1997; FAO

60

2005). However, the majority of agricultural soils are characterized by low organic matter

61

content. Soil erosion is also exacerbated by traditional management of agricultural fields,

62

which involves chemical fertilization and the use of machinery for soil conditioning and

63

establishment of monocultures (Toro et al. 2008). As an alternative, the nutritional status of

64

infertile soils can be improved through biological fertilization. Research in the field of

65

biofertilizers includes soil nutrient management, biological control and the use of plant

66

growth-promoting rhizobacteria, all of which are economic and renewable sources of

67

nutrition suited for increasing agricultural production and improving soil fertility (Dodd et

68

al. 1990; Vessey 2003). This use of bacteria to stimulate plant growth is an

69

environmentally friendly approach, since the molecules of bacterial origin are

70

biodegradable, as opposed to agrochemicals, which are more persistent (Lugtenberg and

71

Kamilova 2009).

3

Can. J. Microbiol. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA on 09/02/14 For personal use only. This Just-IN manuscript is the accepted manuscript prior to copy editing and page composition. It may differ from the final official version of record.

Page 4 of 34

72

Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria can colonize roots to increase growth and

73

crop yields; they are also able to control plant-pathogenic microorganisms and enhance

74

resistance to abiotic stresses (van Peer et al. 1991; Van Loon 2007; Lugtenberg and

75

Kamilova 2009; Kavamura et al. 2013). Numerous rhizobacteria are reported to be plant

76

growth promoters, including Azotobacter, Azospirillum, Burkholderia, Enterobacter,

77

Pseudomonas, Bacillus, Methanobacterium, Clostridium, and Rhizobia (Reis et al. 2000;

78

Ahmad et al. 2008; Hayat et al. 2010; Gamalero and Glick 2011; Bhattacharyya and Jha

79

2012). The beneficial effects of rhizobacteria on plant growth are manifested in three ways:

80

there is the synthesis of compounds that act on the plants; there is the increase in nutrient

81

uptake by plants; and there is a reduction in or prevention of plant diseases caused by

82

pathogens (Hayat et al. 2010).

83

Plant growth and plant protection are promoted either directly or indirectly. Direct

84

promotion works through production of plant regulators such as auxins, cytokinins,

85

gibberellins and abscisic acid. Alternatively, direct promotion can function through

86

degradation of ethylene, solubilization of minerals such as phosphate (to increase their

87

uptake), symbiotic nitrogen fixation, or synthesis of vitamins (Hayat et al. 2010). As for

88

indirect promotion, plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria synthesize siderophores (high-

89

affinity iron chelating compounds), antibiotics such as agrocin substances, herbicolin, 2,4-

90

diacetylphloroglucinol, oomycin, pyoluteorin, phenazines, cyclic lipopeptides, pyrrolnitrin,

91

hydrogen cyanide and lytic enzymes or fungal cell wall degrading enzymes (e.g. chitinase

92

and ß-1,3-glucanase) (Vessey 2003; Fernando et al. 2006; Lugtenberg and Kamilova 2009;

93

Hayat et al. 2010; Gamalero and Glick 2011).

94 95

Indole acetic acid (IAA) is one of the most physiologically active auxins in plants (Zhao 2010; Taiz and Zeiger 2010), although it is also biosynthesized by fungi and bacteria 4

Can. J. Microbiol. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA on 09/02/14 For personal use only. This Just-IN manuscript is the accepted manuscript prior to copy editing and page composition. It may differ from the final official version of record.

Page 5 of 34

96

(Frankenberger and Poth 1987; Arshad and Frankenberger, Jr. 1991). It is a common

97

product of L-tryptophan metabolism in several microorganisms, including plant growth-

98

promoting rhizobacteria (Frankenberger and Poth 1987; Arshad and Frankenberger, Jr.

99

1991). IAA regulates many aspects of plant development, including stem elongation, apical

100

dominance, tropism, and lateral root initiation, as well as fruit, meristem and root hair

101

development by cell division and elongation (Taiz and Zeiger 2010). IAA synthesized by

102

bacteria can enhance the production of root hairs and the lateral and adventitious roots,

103

leading to improved mineral and nutrient uptake and root exudation, which stimulates

104

bacterial proliferation in the rhizosphere (Gamalero and Glick 2011).

105

To date, only a limited number of reports have been published about growth-

106

promoting rhizobacteria in the chickpea plant (Sarma et al. 2002; Singh et al. 2003; Joseph

107

et al. 2007; Rokhzadi et al. 2013). To improve their application to agricultural practices

108

will require a greater exploration of rhizobacteria diversity, and an evaluation of their traits,

109

such as IAA production. In the present study we have screened chickpea rhizobacteria for

110

their capacity to produce IAA as a plant growth regulator, and we have analyzed their root

111

promotion ability with the main goal of selecting those with potential to be used as

112

biofertilizers.

113 114

MATERIALS AND METHODS

115

Bacterial collection

116

A bacterial collection of 864 isolates (Scientific Collection CIIDIR-006) from the

117

chickpea rhizosphere (C. arietinum L.) was created following the methodology of Cordero-

118

Ramírez et al. (2012). A total of thirty chickpea rhizosphere samples were collected from

119

six chickpea fields in Guasave, Sinaloa, Mexico. Five plants were sampled from each field 5

Can. J. Microbiol. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA on 09/02/14 For personal use only. This Just-IN manuscript is the accepted manuscript prior to copy editing and page composition. It may differ from the final official version of record.

Page 6 of 34

120

and were homogenized together and stored at room temperature. Only the soil particles

121

strongly added to the roots (rhizospheric soil) were taken to isolate the microorganisms

122

using serial dilutions by plating 100 µL per dilution. Luria Bertani (LB) medium was used

123

to generate the chickpea rhizospheric bacterial collection. Single colonies were taken from

124

LB after 24 hours growth at 25º C. After two rounds of purification in LB medium and

125

microscopic confirmation of a uniform bacterial morphology for each isolates they were

126

cryopreserved in 96-well plates at -70°C, using 200 µL of LB containing 15% glycerol by

127

triplicate (Pasarell and McGinnis, 1992). Frozen stocks were made from each isolate and

128

were grown at 25°C and 200 rpm in 2 mL 96-well plates containing 1 mL liquid LB

129

medium for 24 hours. The isolate was considered nonviable if no visible growth was

130

observed after thawing. Only viable isolates were included in the collection.

131 132 133

Screening of bacterial isolates by Salkowski reaction The bacterial collection was screened for IAA-like compound production using

134

Salkowski colorimetric assays (Glickmann and Dessaux 1995). Isolates were cultured in 2

135

mL 96-well plates containing 1 mL of LB (without any tryptophan supplement) at 28 ± 2°C

136

for 48 h and 200 rpm, followed by centrifugation at 3,020 g for 25 min (Beckman Coulter

137

Avanti J-30I, JS-5.9 rotor). Pellets were discarded and the supernatants were filtered

138

through 0.22 µm pore size filters (Cat. SLGV 013 SL Millex® Millipore). A 100 µl volume

139

of the bacterial LB supernatant (BLBS) was mixed with 100 µl of Salkowski reagent (20 g

140

per liter of FeCl3•6H2O in 7.9 M H2SO4). The mix was incubated for 30 min in the dark at

141

25 ± 2°C, the absorbance was recorded at 530 nm with a spectrophotometer (Spectro

142

Multiskan GO, Thermo Scientific), and the concentration of IAA produced was estimated

6

Can. J. Microbiol. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA on 09/02/14 For personal use only. This Just-IN manuscript is the accepted manuscript prior to copy editing and page composition. It may differ from the final official version of record.

Page 7 of 34

143

by using a standard IAA (Cat. 12886, Sigma) curve as a reference. Three replicates were

144

evaluated for each BLBS sample or control.

145 146 147

Spectrophotometric scanning measurement A spectrophotometric scan was performed at a wavelength range from 400 to 700

148

nm and a 2 nm resolution. A 1:1 v/v mix was prepared with a combination of Salkowski

149

reagent and either the bacterial supernatant or auxin-activity compounds in LB. Absorption

150

peaks (λmax) of the mixes containing IAA, indole butyric acid (IBA), naphthalene acetic

151

acid (NAA), LB, tryptophan, sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and BLBS were compared.

152 153 154

Effect of BLBS and IAA on root architecture in Arabidopsis thaliana Three-day old Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype Columbia-0 seedlings (n=3) were

155

planted on Petri dishes with 0.5X MS medium (Murashige and Skoog 1962). Seedlings

156

were supplemented with either LB, 50 nM IAA, or BLBS (equivalent to 50 nM of IAA as

157

measured by the Salkowski reaction). Each experiment, comprising three Petri dishes with

158

three plants each (n=9), was evaluated after five days of treatment, and the experiment was

159

repeated three times independently.

160

Petri dishes were maintained upright for five days in growth chambers (Binder Mod.

161

KBW 400) at 25 ± 2ºC (16 h:8 h light:dark photoperiod). Primary root growth was recorded

162

every 24 h, and the number of lateral roots was quantified on the fifth day. Root

163

architecture was evaluated by staining roots with the general dye propidium iodide (Cat.

164

P4170, Sigma), followed by observation with a confocal laser scanning microscope (Leica

165

TCS SP5X). Samples were excited at 488 nm and visualized under emission ranges from

166

502 to 548 nm. All micrographs were taken under the same settings. 7

Can. J. Microbiol. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA on 09/02/14 For personal use only. This Just-IN manuscript is the accepted manuscript prior to copy editing and page composition. It may differ from the final official version of record.

Page 8 of 34

167 168

Evaluation of the biological functionality of IAA-like compounds secreted by

169

rhizobacteria in pDR5::GFP transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana plants

170

Fourteen-day old seedlings of A. thaliana pDR5::GFP (Friml et al. 2003) were

171

immersed in either 500 µL of BLBS (equivalent to 100 µM IAA), LB, or sterile distilled

172

water at 25 ± 2°C for 12 h. The concentration of IAA-like compounds in the BLBS was

173

estimated by the Salkowski reaction as described above. All samples were analyzed in

174

triplicate at pH 7 after the BLBS was filtered through a 0.22 µm Millipore filter (Cat.

175

SLGV 013 SL Millex®, Millipore). A. thaliana leaves were observed with a confocal laser

176

scanning microscope (Leica TCS SP5X) using a 488 nm excitation laser, and visualized

177

with both beam lines for chlorophyll fluorescence emission (red, 640-700 nm) and GFP

178

(green, 496-540 nm). All micrographs were taken under the same settings.

179 180 181

Evaluation of IAA-producing rhizobacteria in chickpea plants Rhizobacteria were evaluated under greenhouse conditions in substrate composed of

182

sand and vermiculite (1:1 v/v) with pH 6.8 and electrical conductivity of 0.14 mS/cm. The

183

substrate was sterilized twice at 121°C (15 PSI) for one hour followed by a 24 h waiting

184

period before use. Chickpea (var. Costa 2004) seeds (obtained from Productores Unidos del

185

Río Petatlán/INIFAP JJR, Sinaloa, Mexico) were surface-sterilized with sodium

186

hypochlorite (0.3%) for 10 min and rinsed with sterile distilled water five times and then

187

planted in 1 L pots. Seven-day old plant root systems were inoculated with bacterial

188

suspensions prepared in water containing 3 x 109 CFU per plant. Negative controls only

189

received water. Plants were supplemented with Long-Ashton nutritive solution (Hewitt

8

Can. J. Microbiol. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA on 09/02/14 For personal use only. This Just-IN manuscript is the accepted manuscript prior to copy editing and page composition. It may differ from the final official version of record.

Page 9 of 34

190

1966) once per week. Plant irrigation was performed every three days with sterile water.

191

Thirty days after inoculation, plants were evaluated by recording their biomass (e.g. dry

192

weight of roots and shoots). This experiment was repeated three times independently with

193

similar results.

194 195

Statistical analyses Results for IAA production by Salkowski reaction, primary root growth, lateral root

196 197

(LR) density, LR length and root growth (measured as dry weight) were subjected to

198

variance analysis. All experiments were performed at least three times independently,

199

producing similar results. The means were compared by the least significant difference

200

(LSD) test at P = 0.05 with the Statistical Analysis System 9.0 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary,

201

NC).

202 203

Mass spectrometric identification of IAA in rhizobacterial culture supernatants

204

Samples for mass spectrometry analysis were prepared from 100 ml bacterial

205

cultures. Bacteria were removed by centrifugation at 10,000 g for 25 min, and the

206

supernatants were filtered through 0.22 µm pore size filters (Cat. SLGV 013 SL Millex®,

207

Millipore). The supernatants were extracted twice with equal volumes of ethyl acetate, and

208

both extractions were combined and freeze-dried in a liophilizer (Freezone, Labconco).

209

Samples were then dissolved in 1 mL of HPLC-grade ethanol. 100 µl of sample were dried

210

with nitrogen gas and silylated using 20 µl of pyridine and 80 µl of 1% (v/v) N,N-bis(tri-

211

methyl-silyl) tri-fluoro-acetamide in tri-methyl chloro-silane (TMS) at 80°C for 30 min.

212

Samples (1 µl) were injected and analyzed in an Agilent Technologies 7890A GC System

213

equipped with a capillary column (HP5-MS, 30 m × 0.25 mm i.d. x 250 µm film thickness) 9

Can. J. Microbiol. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA on 09/02/14 For personal use only. This Just-IN manuscript is the accepted manuscript prior to copy editing and page composition. It may differ from the final official version of record.

Page 10 of 34

214

coupled to a mass selective detector (Agilent Technologies 5975C). The following

215

operating conditions were used: injector temperature 250ºC, with oven temperature

216

programmed as initial temperature 150ºC for 3 min, then increasing at a rate of 4ºC/min to

217

a final temperature of 280ºC, which was then maintained for 25 min. Helium was used as

218

the carrier gas, with a constant flow rate of 1 ml/min. The EI source had a mass

219

spectrometer temperature of 230ºC, and the mass spectrometer Quadrupole temperature

220

was 150ºC. The spectra of indolic compounds were then identified using the Deconvolution

221

AMDIS software from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), as well

222

as the spectra library from the NIST MS Data Base Search version 2 software.

223 224 225

Molecular identification of bacteria Bacterial isolates were grown on LB plates for 48 h at 28°C. Bacterial pellets were

226

resuspended in ultrapure distilled water (Cat. 10977, Gibco) and boiled to obtain DNA

227

template, and debris was removed by centrifugation at 10,000 g for 15 min at 4°C.

228

The universal primers F2C (AGAGTTTGATCATGGCTC) and C

229

(ACGGGCGGTGTGTAC) were used for 16S rDNA partial amplification (Shi et al. 1997).

230

The PCR mixture contained 1 – 2.5 µL of bacterial lysates, 1X reaction buffer, 1 mM

231

MgCl2, 0.5 mM of each primer, 500 µM of each deoxy-nucleoside-tri-phosphate (dNTP),

232

and 0.5 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Cat. 10966-030, Invitrogen) in a total volume of 25

233

µL. PCR amplification was performed with a C-1000 thermocycler (Bio-Rad), using the

234

following program: an initial denaturation step at 95°C for 4 min; 32 cycles consisting of a

235

1 min denaturation step at 95°C, 1 min annealing step at 60°C, and 2 min extension step at

236

72°C; and a final step at 72°C for 5 min. PCR products were separated by 1.2% agarose gel

237

electrophoresis in 0.5X Tris-boric acid-EDTA (TBE) buffer and stained with Gel-RedTM 10

Can. J. Microbiol. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA on 09/02/14 For personal use only. This Just-IN manuscript is the accepted manuscript prior to copy editing and page composition. It may differ from the final official version of record.

Page 11 of 34

238

(Cat. 41003, Biotium). A Chemidoc photodocumentation system (Bio-Rad) was used to

239

visualize the amplicons. Only one band was observed per rhizobacteria PCR amplification

240

(~1.4 kb). Amplicons were purified using the QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Cat. 28106,

241

Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s indications. The amplicons were sequenced bi-

242

directionally with an ABI Prism 3100 Automated Sequencer at the National Laboratory of

243

Genomics (Langebio, CINVESTAV Irapuato, Mexico) using the primers

244

U1(CCAGCAGCCGCGGTAATACG) and C (ACGGGCGGTGTGTAC) (Shi et al. 1997;

245

Lu et al. 2000).

246 247

Sequence analysis

248

Homologous 16SrDNA sequences were searched against bacterial databases from

249

the Ribosomal Database project (http://rdp.cme.msu.edu), using the BLAST-N nucleotide

250

software with the Megablast algorithm (Cole et al. 2009). Our identification criterion was

251

based on a > 98% sequence identity. The sequences were aligned using the multiple

252

sequence alignment software Clustal W (Yadav et al. 2010), and a phylogenetic tree was

253

then generated with the MEGA 5 software (Tamura et al. 2011). Phylogenetic tree

254

construction also utilized the neighbor joining method (Saitou and Nei 1987) with a Kimura

255

2 substitution model. Variation rate was modeled with a gamma distribution, using five

256

categories. The neighbor joining topology strength was evaluated by bootstrap test with

257

1000 replicates. Ten chickpea rhizobacteria sequences (GenBank KF303795-KF303804)

258

were included in our phylogenetic tree, along with reference strains of closely related

259

genera (Enterobacter spp.). Pectobacterium carotovorum (NR044980) and Proteus

260

vulgaris (NR025336) were used as outgroups.

261 11

Can. J. Microbiol. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA on 09/02/14 For personal use only. This Just-IN manuscript is the accepted manuscript prior to copy editing and page composition. It may differ from the final official version of record.

Page 12 of 34

262

RESULTS

263

Selection of auxin-like secreting bacteria by Salkowski reaction screening

264

Two molecules with auxin activity were used to evaluate the specificity of the

265

Salkowski reaction for IAA-like compounds: IBA (a synthetic auxin with an indole ring

266

whose radical group differs from IAA) and NAA (which has the same radical group as IAA

267

but lacks the indole ring). Auxins and BLBS as well as a number of controls were all

268

spectrophotometrically scanned and plotted from 440 to 600 nm. Only the Salkowski

269

reaction with IAA exhibited a maximum absorbance at 530 nm. Neither the auxin activity

270

compounds (NAA and IBA) nor the controls (LB and Trp) had a maximum at 530 nm (Fig.

271

1A). Following the Salkowski reaction, the BLBS of isolate 476 showed a maximum

272

absorbance at the same wavelength as IAA. Scans from all bacterial isolates displayed an

273

absorbance pattern that was identical to isolate 476, and the same absorbance peak as IAA

274

(data not shown). In the absence of the Salkowski reagent, no compounds were able to

275

exhibit similar absorbance patterns or a maximum absorbance at 530 nm, as compared to

276

IAA (Fig. 1A). These results suggest that the Salkowski reaction is specific for IAA or

277

IAA-like compounds with an acyl radical group in the C-3 position of the indole ring

278

including indoleacetamide and indolepyruvic (Glickmann and Dessaux 1995) .

279

The complete chickpea rhizosphere bacterial collection was screened using the

280

Salkowski reaction. The initial selection criterion for IAA-producing bacteria was the

281

development of pink color upon contact with this reagent. Seventy-four out of the 864

282

rhizobacteria exhibited this pink color, from which we repeated the Salkowski reaction. Ten

283

isolates showing the most intense pink color were further selected after quantification of

284

IAA-like compounds (Fig. 1B). We observed that rhizobacteria secreted IAA-like

12

Can. J. Microbiol. Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA on 09/02/14 For personal use only. This Just-IN manuscript is the accepted manuscript prior to copy editing and page composition. It may differ from the final official version of record.

Page 13 of 34

285

compounds in the concentration range of 5 to 80 µM. Four of these rhizobacteria (476, 715,

286

727 and 758) secreted between 65 – 80 µM. The bacteria could thus be separated into two

287

subgroups: those with high (> 60 µM) or low (

IAA-producing rhizobacteria from chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) induce changes in root architecture and increase root biomass.

Rhizobacteria promote and have beneficial effects on plant growth, making them useful to agriculture. Nevertheless, the rhizosphere of the chickpea pl...
798KB Sizes 5 Downloads 5 Views