AAC Accepts, published online ahead of print on 14 April 2014 Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. doi:10.1128/AAC.00038-14 Copyright © 2014, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
1
Importance of multi-drug efflux pumps in the antimicrobial resistance property of
2
clinical multi-drug resistant isolates of Neisseria gonorrhoeae
3
Daniel Golparian,a William M. Shafer,b,c Makoto Ohnishi,d Magnus Unemoa*
4
WHO Collaborating Centre for Gonorrhoea and other Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs),
5
National Reference Laboratory for Pathogenic Neisseria, Department of Laboratory Medicine,
6
Microbiology, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Swedena; Department of Microbiology
7
and Immunology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USAb;
8
Laboratories of Bacterial Pathogenesis, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Decatur, Georgia,
9
USAc; National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japand
10 11
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: WHO Collaborating Centre for Gonorrhoea and
12
other STIs, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Microbiology, Örebro University Hospital,
13
SE-701 85 Örebro, Sweden. Phone: +46 (19) 602 1520. Fax: +46 (19) 127 416. E-mail:
14
[email protected].
15
The work was performed at the WHO Collaborating Centre for Gonorrhoea and other STIs,
16
National Reference Laboratory for Pathogenic Neisseria, Department of Laboratory Medicine,
17
Microbiology, Örebro University Hospital, SE-701 85 Örebro, Sweden.
18
Key words: Gonorrhea; antimicrobial resistance; ceftriaxone; cefixime; efflux pump; MtrC-
19
MtrD-MtrE; MacA-MacB; NorM; treatment; efflux pump inhibitor
20
Word count: Abstract: 75; Text: 1027
21
Running title: INACTIVATION OF MtrC-MtrD-MtrE PUMP REVERTS RESISTANCE
22 23
1
24
The contribution of drug efflux pumps in clinical isolates of Neisseria gonorrhoeae
25
that express extensively- or multi-drug resistant phenotypes has heretofore not been
26
examined. Accordingly, we assessed the consequence on antimicrobial resistance due to
27
loss of the three gonococcal efflux pumps associated with known capacity to export
28
antimicrobials (MtrC-MtrD-MtrE, MacA-MacB and NorM) in such clinical isolates. We
29
report that the MIC of several antimicrobials including seven previously and currently
30
recommended for treatment was significantly impacted.
31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47
2
48
Gonorrhea remains a major public health concern worldwide (1). Neisseria gonorrhoeae has
49
developed resistance to all antimicrobials introduced for treatment (2-5). Recently, treatment
50
failures with the extended-spectrum cephalosporins (ESCs) cefixime and ceftriaxone were
51
verified in several countries and some extensively-drug resistant (XDR) gonococcal strains,
52
displaying high-level ceftriaxone resistance, described (3,6-13). ESCs are the last options for
53
antimicrobial monotherapy of gonorrhea. Thus, novel antimicrobials or non-antimicrobial
54
compounds for sustained therapy of gonorrhea are essential.
55
The mechanisms of ESC resistance involve specific modifications of the target penicillin
56
binding protein 2 (PBP2), PorB1b resulting in decreased intake, and increased efflux by an
57
over-expressed MtrC-MtrD-MtrE efflux pump (3,5,7,12,14-19). The MtrC-MtrD-MtrE efflux
58
pump belongs to the family of Resistance/Nodulation/Division (RND) pumps and is
59
functionally and structurally similar to the AcrAB-TolC efflux pump in Escherichia coli and
60
MexA-MexB-OprM in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. All these three pumps contribute to
61
bacterial resistance to antimicrobials including penicillin (20) and macrolides (21). Gonococci
62
harbor two additional efflux pumps that are known to extrude antimicrobials, i.e., the MacA-
63
MacB and NorM pumps that exports macrolides (22) and fluoroquinolones (23), respectively.
64
However, detailed information regarding the potential export of ESCs and other
65
antimicrobials, especially by multi-resistant clinical isolates through those gonococcal efflux
66
pumps is limited.
67
Herein, we have genetically inactivated the MtrC-MtrD-MtrE, MacA-MacB and NorM
68
efflux pumps in XDR and multidrug-resistant (MDR) gonococcal isolates and measured the
69
effects on susceptibility to previously or currently recommended antimicrobials for treatment
70
of gonorrhea.
71
The isolates examined were the WHO reference strains WHO F, considered to be a wild-
72
type strain susceptible to all included antimicrobials, and WHO P (24), four isolates from
3
73
ESC treatment failures, including the first XDR strain (strain H041) with high-level
74
ceftriaxone resistance (6,10,12), one isolate displaying high-level azithromycin resistance
75
(25), and three isolates displaying low-level azithromycin resistance. All strains except WHO
76
F contained mtrR mutations known to increase the expression of mtrCDE (21,26) and
77
possessed the mtrCDE-, macAB- and norM-encoded pumps. None of the strains produced β-
78
lactamase or contained any erm genes (data not presented). The MICs (µg/ml) of seven
79
antimicrobials, pre- and post-inactivation of the efflux pump(s), were determined using the
80
Etest method (bioMérieux, Solna, Sweden) on Difco GC Medium Base agar (BD,
81
Diagnostics, Sparks, MD, USA) supplemented with 1% IsoVitalex (BD Diagnostics),
82
according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Table 1 and 2). The mtrD, macA and norM
83
genes were inactivated (IA) in the isolates by spot transformation (27) using 0.1 µg of
84
chromosomal DNA from genetic derivatives of strain FA19 or wild-type strain FA19 bearing
85
insertions in mtrD (strain KH14; mtrD::kan), macA (strain BR54 macA::spc) or norM (strain
86
FA19 norM::kan). Transformants resistant to kanamycin (100 µg/ml) or spectinomycin (60
87
µg/ml) were selected as previously described (22,23,28). MIC differences were considered as
88
significant if they were greater than a two-fold change in the mutants compared to parent
89
strain. Inactivation of efflux pump genes in representative transformants was confirmed using
90
PCR and pump gene-specific oligonuclucleotide primers as described (22,23,28).
91
Loss of the MtrC-MtrD-MtrE pump had the highest impact on the XDR phenotype of
92
H041 (Table 1) and on MDR phenotypes (Table 2). The H041-IAMtrCDE transformant showed
93
significantly increased susceptibility to penicillin, ceftriaxone, azithromycin, tetracycline and
94
solithromycin. The H041-IAMacAB transformant had a 4- and 2-fold increased susceptibility to
95
azithromycin and ceftriaxone, respectively, while the IANorM transformant showed
96
significantly (>32-fold) increased solithromycin susceptibility. Loss of multiple pumps did
4
97
not significantly increase susceptibility compared to mutants lacking only MtrC-MtrD-MtrE
98
(Table 1).
99
Loss of the MtrC-MtrD-MtrE pump in the three clinical ESC-resistant isolates
100
significantly increased susceptibility to ESCs, penicillin, azithromycin, ciprofloxacin, and
101
solithromycin (Table 2). Loss of the MacA-MacB or NorM pump in these strains did not
102
consistently and significantly change the MICs of antimicrobials. Since azithromycin is used
103
in the dual therapy with ceftriaxone recommended in USA (29) and Europe (30), we
104
examined four strains with low-level azithromycin resistance (MIC=2-8 µg/ml) and one strain
105
with high-level azithromycin resistance (MIC=4096 µg/ml). For all four strains with low-level
106
resistance, the susceptibility to azithromycin increased by 8-32-fold due to a loss of the MtrC-
107
MtrD-MtrE pump, whereas loss of the MacA-MacB or NorM pump had no significant effect
108
on azithromycin resistance. Similarly, loss of the MtrC-MtrD-MtrE pump in the high-level
109
resistant strain (MIC=4096 µg/ml) decreased susceptibility to azithromycin by five-fold
110
(Table 2).
111
In gonococci, the main focus of past research regarding efflux pump-mediated
112
antimicrobial resistance has been on the MtrC-MtrD-MtrE pump, which can be over-
113
expressed due to specific mutations in mtrR (promoter or coding sequence) that encodes the
114
repressor MtrR (16,17,20,31-33). Over-expression is known to affect the susceptibility of
115
macrolides, penicillins and ESCs (3,5,15,20,32). Herein, we showed that the susceptibility to
116
also ciprofloxacin and solithromycin can be affected. The MtrC-MtrD-MtrE pump also
117
exports fatty acids, bile salts and endogenous antibacterial peptides and, accordingly, an over-
118
expression might cause an enhanced fitness of the gonococcal strains (34-36). The MacA-
119
MacB and NorM pumps are known to export macrolides (22) and fluoroquinolones (23),
120
respectively. We also showed that ESCs, penicillin and solithromycin might be exported by
121
NorM and/or MacA-MacB. However, since β-lactam antimicrobials and solithromycin are not
5
122
previously described to be substrates of the MacA-MacB or NorM efflux pumps (31), we can
123
not discount the possibility that loss of these pumps have secondary effects that increase cell
124
envelope permeability to these antimicrobials.
125
In conclusion, we found that inactivation of efflux pumps in antimicrobial resistant
126
clinical gonococcal isolates influenced susceptibility to many antimicrobials, even reverting
127
strains to clinical susceptibility according to MIC breakpoints. This was most notable for the
128
MtrC-MtrD-MtrE pump in H041, the first clinical XDR isolate, with high-level resistance to
129
ceftriaxone, obtained from a ceftriaxone treatment failure (12). However, this was also
130
observed for many MDR clinical gonococcal strains (6,10,24,25), including strains that
131
resulted in ESC treatment failures. Accordingly, a specific efflux pump inhibitor (EPI) of the
132
gonococcal
133
antimicrobials, might be a future treatment option for gonorrhea. This could be a novel
134
approach to retain antimicrobials for longer use, e.g. ceftriaxone, even restore antimicrobials
135
no longer in use due to high-level resistance, e.g. penicillin, and that could also mitigate the
136
resistance emergence. Nevertheless, many challenges remain in the development of a
137
gonococcal EPI, e.g. selection of ideal target and avoidance of toxicity on human cells (37-
138
39).
MtrC-MtrD-MtrE
pump,
particularly
co-administered
with
appropriate
139 140
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
141
This study was supported by grants from the Research Committee of Örebro County and the
142
Örebro University Hospital Research Foundation, Örebro, Sweden (M.U.), NIH grants R37
143
AI021150 and U19 AI031496, and a VA Merit Award from the Medical Research Service of
144
the Department of Veterans Affairs (W.M.S.). W.M.S. is the recipient of a Senior Research
145
Career Scientist Award from the Medical Research Service of the Department of Veterans
146
Affairs.
6
147 148
REFERENCES
149
1. World Health Organization. 2012. Global incidence and prevalence of selected
150
curable sexually transmitted infections - 2008. Geneva: World Health Organization;
151
2012.
152
http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/rtis/2008_STI_estimates.pdf
153
(accessed 10 March, 2014).
Available
from:
154
2. Tapsall JW, Ndowa F, Lewis DA, Unemo M. 2009. Meeting the public health
155
challenge of multidrug- and extensively drug-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Expert.
156
Rev. Anti. Infect. Ther. 7:821-834.
157 158 159 160 161 162
3. Unemo M, Nicholas RA. 2012. Emergence of multidrug-resistant, extensively drugresistant and untreatable gonorrhea. Future Microbiol. 7:1401-1422. 4. Bolan GA, Sparling PF, Wasserheit JN. 2012. The emerging threat of untreatable gonococcal infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 366:485-487. 5. Lewis DA. 2010. The gonococcus fights back: is this time a knock out? Sex. Transm. Infect. 86:415-421.
163
6. Unemo M, Golparian D, Syversen G, Vestrheim DF, Moi H. 2010. Two cases of
164
verified clinical failures using internationally recommended first-line cefixime for
165
gonorrhoea treatment, Norway, 2010. Euro. Surveill. 15(47):pii=19721.
166
7. Unemo M, Golparian D, Nicholas R, Ohnishi M, Gallay A, Sednaoui P. 2011.
167
High-level cefixime- and ceftriaxone-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae in France: novel
168
penA mosaic allele in a successful international clone causes treatment failure.
169
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 56:1273-1280.
170
8. Lewis DA, Sriruttan C, Müller EE, Golparian D, Gumede L, Fick D, de Wet J,
171
Maseko V, Coetzee J, Unemo M. 2013. Phenotypic and genetic characterization of 7
172
the
first
two
cases
of
extended-spectrum-cephalosporin-resistant
Neisseria
173
gonorrhoeae infection in South Africa and association with cefixime treatment failure.
174
J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 68:1267-1270.
175
9. Allen VG, Mitterni L, Seah C, Rebbapragada A, Martin IE, Lee C, Siebert
176
H, Towns L, Melano RG, Low DE. 2013. Neisseria gonorrhoeae treatment failure
177
and susceptibility to cefixime in Toronto, Canada. JAMA. 309:163-170.
178
10. Unemo M, Golparian D, Hestner A. 2011. Ceftriaxone treatment failure of
179
pharyngeal gonorrhoea verified by international recommendations, Sweden, July
180
2010. Euro. Surveill. 16(6):pii=19792.
181
11. Chen YM, Stevens K, Tideman R, Zaia A, Tomita T, Fairley CK, Lahra M,
182
Whiley D, Hogg G. 2013. Failure of ceftriaxone 500 mg to eradicate pharyngeal
183
gonorrhoea, Australia. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 68:1445-1447.
184
12. Ohnishi M, Golparian D, Shimuta K, Saika T, Hoshina S, Iwasaku K, Nakayama
185
S, Kitawaki J, Unemo M. 2011. Is Neisseria gonorrhoeae initiating a future era of
186
untreatable gonorrhea? Detailed characterization of the first strain with high-level
187
resistance to ceftriaxone. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 55:3538-3545.
188
13. Camara J, Serra J, Ayats J, Bastida T, Carnicer-Pont D, Andreu A, Ardanuy C.
189
2012. Molecular characterization of two high-level ceftriaxone-resistant Neisseria
190
gonorrhoeae isolates detected in Catalonia, Spain. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
191
67:1858-1860.
192
14. Tomberg J, Unemo M, Davies C, Nicholas RA. 2010. Molecular and structural
193
analysis of mosaic variants of penicillin-binding protein 2 conferring decreased
194
susceptibility to expanded-spectrum cephalosporins in Neisseria gonorrhoeae: role of
195
epistatic mutations. Biochemistry 49:8062-8070.
8
196
15. Zhao S, Duncan M, Tomberg J, Davies C, Unemo M, Nicholas RA. 2009. Genetics
197
of chromosomally mediated intermediate resistance to ceftriaxone and cefixime in
198
Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53:3744-3751.
199
16. Folster JP, Johnson PJ, Jackson L, Dhulipali V, Dyer DW, Shafer WM. 2009.
200
MtrR modulates rpoH expression and levels of antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria
201
gonorrhoeae. J. Bacteriol. 19:287-297.
202
17. Ohneck EA, Zalucki YM, Johnson PJ, Dhulipala V, Golparian D, Unemo M,
203
Jerse AE, Shafer WM. 2011. A novel mechanism of high-level, broad-spectrum
204
antibiotic resistance caused by a single base pair change in Neisseria gonorrhoeae.
205
MBio 2(5):pii=e00187-11.
206
18. Olesky M, Hobbs M, Nicholas RA. 2002. Identification and analysis of amino acid
207
mutations in porin IB that mediate intermediate-level resistance to penicillin and
208
tetracycline in Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:2811-2820.
209
19. Olesky M, Zhao S, Rosenberg RL, Nicholas RA. 2006. Porin-mediated antibiotic
210
resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae: ion, solute, and antibiotic permeation through
211
PIB proteins with penB mutations. J. Bacteriol. 188:2300-2308.
212
20. Veal WL, Nicholas RA, Shafer WM. 2002. Overexpression of the MtrC-MtrD-MtrE
213
efflux pump due to an mtrR mutation is required for chromosomally mediated
214
penicillin resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J. Bacteriol. 184:5619-5624.
215
21. Zarantonelli L, Borthagaray G, Lee EH, Shafer WM. 1999. Decreased
216
azithromycin susceptibility of Neisseria gonorrhoeae due to mtrR mutations.
217
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:2468-2472.
218
22. Rouquette-Loughlin CE, Balthazar JT, Shafer WM. 2005. Characterization of the
219
MacA-MacB efflux system in Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
220
56:856-860.
9
221
23. Rouquette-Loughlin CE, Dunham SA, Kuhn M, Balthazar JT, Shafer WM. 2003.
222
The NorM efflux pump of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Neisseria meningitidis
223
recognizes antimicrobial cationic compounds. J. Bacteriol. 185:1101-1106.
224
24. Unemo M, Fasth O, Fredlund H, Limnios A, Tapsall J. 2009. Phenotypic and
225
genetic characterization of the 2008 WHO Neisseria gonorrhoeae reference strain
226
panel intended for global quality assurance and quality control of gonococcal
227
antimicrobial resistance surveillance for public health purposes. J. Antimicrob.
228
Chemother. 63:1142-1151.
229
25. Unemo M, Golparian D, Hellmark B. 2014. First three Neisseria gonorrhoeae
230
isolates with high-level resistance to azithromycin in Sweden – threat to currently
231
available dual antimicrobial regimens for treatment of gonorrhea? Antimicrob. Agents
232
Chemother. 58:624-625.
233 234 235
26. Hagman KE, Shafer WM. 1995. Transcriptional control of the mtr efflux system of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J. Bacteriol. 177:4162-4165. 27. Gunn JS, Stein DC. 1996. Use of a non-selective transformation technique to
236
construct
a
multiply
restriction/modification-deficient
237
gonorrhoeae. Mol. Gen. Genet. 251:509-517.
mutant
of
Neisseria
238
28. Veal WL, Yellen A, Balthazar JT, Pan W, Spratt BG, Shafer WM. 1998. Loss-of-
239
function mutations in the mtr efflux system of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Microbiology.
240
144 (Pt 3):621-627.
241
29. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2012. Update to CDC's
242
sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2010: Oral cephalosporins no
243
longer recommended for treatment of gonococcal infections. MMWR. Morb. Mortal.
244
Wkly. Rep. 61:590-594.
245
30. Bignell C, Unemo M, on behalf of the European STI Guidelines Editorial Board.
10
246
2013. 2012 European guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of gonorrhoea in
247
adults. Int. J. STD. AIDS. 24:85-92.
248
31. Shafer WM, Folster JP, Nicholas RA. 2010. Molecular mechanisms of antibiotic
249
resistance expressed by the pathogenic Neisseria. In: Neisseria-Molecular Mechanisms
250
of Pathogenic Neisseria. Caister Academic Press. 2010.
251
32. Hagman KE, Pan W, Spratt BG, Balthazar JT, Judd RC, Shafer WM. 1995.
252
Resistance of Neisseria gonorrhoeae to antimicrobial hydrophobic agents is
253
modulated by the mtrRCDE efflux system. Microbiology 141:611-622.
254
33. Shafer WM, Qu X, Waring AJ, Lehrer RI. 1998. Modulation of Neisseria
255
gonorrhoeae susceptibility to vertebrate antibacterial peptides due to a member of the
256
resistance/nodulation/division efflux pump family. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
257
95:1829-1833.
258
34. Jerse AE, Sharma ND, Simms AN, Crow ET, Snyder LA, Shafer WM. 2003. A
259
gonococcal efflux pump system enhances bacterial survival in a female mouse model
260
of genital tract infection. Infect. Immun. 71:5576-5582.
261
35. Warner DM, Folster JP, Shafer WM, Jerse AE. 2007. Regulation of the MtrC-
262
MtrD-MtrE efflux-pump system modulates the in vivo fitness of Neisseria
263
gonorrhoeae. J. Infect. Dis. 196:1804-1812
264
36. Warner DM, Shafer WM, Jerse AE. 2008. Clinically relevant mutations that cause
265
derepression of the Neisseria gonorrhoeae MtrC-MtrD-MtrE Efflux pump system
266
confer different levels of antimicrobial resistance and in vivo fitness. Mol. Microbiol.
267
70:462-478.
268
37. Mahamoud A, Chevalier J, Alibert-Franco S, Kern WV, Pagès JM. 2007.
269
Antibiotic efflux pumps in Gram-negative bacteria: the inhibitor response strategy. J.
270
Antimicrob. Chemother. 59:1223-1229.
11
271
38. Lomovskaya O, Bostian KA. 2006. Practical applications and feasibility of efflux
272
pump inhibitors in the clinic--a vision for applied use. Biochem. Pharmacol. 71:910-
273
918.
274 275
39. Pagès JM, Masi M, Barbe J. 2005. Inhibitors of efflux pumps in Gram-negative bacteria. Trends Mol. Med. 11:382-389.
12
276
TABLE
1
MICs
(µg/ml)
of
the
XDR
strain
H041
(Pre-IA;
12),
with
high-level
ceftriaxone
resistance,
277
of 7 antimicrobials after loss of the efflux pumps MtrC-MtrD-MtrE, MacA-MacB and NorM, inactivated separately and in all possible
278
combinations. Ceftriaxone (SIR category)
Cefixime (SIR category)
Penicillin (SIR category)
Azithromycin (SIR category)
Ciprofloxacin (SIR category)
Tetracycline (SIR category)
Solithromycin (SIR category)
Pre-IA
4 (R)
8 (R)
4 (R)
1 (R)
>32 (R)
4 (R)
0.064 (NA)
IAMtrCDE
1 (R)
4 (R)
0.5 (I)
0.064 (S)
16 (R)
1 (I)
0.004 (NA)
IAMacAB
2 (R)
4 (R)
2 (R)
0.25 (S)
>32 (R)
2 (R)
0.125 (NA)
>32 (R)
0.5 (I)