Intermittent and continuous high-intensity exercise induce similar acute but different chronic muscle training adaptations Andrew J.R. Cochran1, Michael E. Percival1, Steven Tricarico1, Jonathan P. Little1, Naomi

Accepted Article

Cermak1, Jenna B. Gillen1, Mark A. Tarnopolsky2, and Martin J. Gibala1

1

Exercise Metabolism Research Group, Department of Kinesiology, McMaster University,

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; 2Department of Pediatrics and Medicine, Division of Neuromuscular and Neurometabolic Disorders, McMaster University, McMaster University Medical Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Correspondence:

Martin J. Gibala, Ph.D. Department of Kinesiology McMaster University 1280 Main St. West Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1 Canada Phone: 905-525-9140 x23591 Fax: 905-523-6011 E-mail: [email protected]

This is an Accepted Article that has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication in the Experimental Physiology, but has yet to undergo copy-editing and proof correction. Please cite this article as an “Accepted Article”; doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.2013.077453.

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

1

New Findings What is the central question of this study?

Accepted Article

How important is the interval in high-intensity interval training? What is the main finding and its importance? The intermittent nature of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) is important for maximizing skeletal muscle adaptations to this type of exercise, at least when a relatively small total volume of work is performed in an "all out" manner. The protein signalling responses to an acute bout of HIIT were generally not predictive of training-induced outcomes. Nonetheless, a single session of exercise lasting

Intermittent and continuous high-intensity exercise training induce similar acute but different chronic muscle adaptations.

High-intensity interval training (HIIT) performed in an 'all-out' manner (e.g. repeated Wingate tests) is a time-efficient strategy to induce skeletal...
678KB Sizes 0 Downloads 0 Views