Accepted Manuscript In vitro fermentation of alginate and its derivatives by human gut microbiota Miaomiao Li, Guangsheng Li, Qingsen Shang, Xiuxia Chen, Wei Liu, Xiong’e Pi, Liying Zhu, Yeshi Yin, Guangli Yu, Xin Wang PII:
S1075-9964(16)30006-3
DOI:
10.1016/j.anaerobe.2016.02.003
Reference:
YANAE 1534
To appear in:
Anaerobe
Received Date: 29 November 2015 Revised Date:
9 February 2016
Accepted Date: 10 February 2016
Please cite this article as: Li M, Li G, Shang Q, Chen X, Liu W, Pi X’e, Zhu L, Yin Y, Yu G, Wang X, In vitro fermentation of alginate and its derivatives by human gut microbiota, Anaerobe (2016), doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2016.02.003. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1
In vitro fermentation of alginate and its derivatives by human gut microbiota
2
Miaomiao Li1†, Guangsheng Li1†, Qingsen Shang1, Xiuxia Chen2, Wei Liu2, Xiong’e Pi2,
3
Liying Zhu2, Yeshi Yin2, Guangli Yu1*, Xin Wang2*
5
1
RI PT
4
Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Glycoscience and Glycotechnology, Key
Laboratory of Marine Drugs of Ministry of Education, Ocean University of China, and
7
Laboratory for Marine Drugs and Bioproducts, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine
8
Science and Technology, Qingdao, 266003, China
2
M AN U
9
SC
6
State Key Laboratory of Breeding Base for Zhejiang Sustainable Pest and Disease
Control, Institute of Plant Protection and Microbiology, Academy of Agricultural
11
Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
12
TE D
10
Corresponding authors:
14
E-mail:
[email protected] or
[email protected] AC C
EP
13
1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 15
ABSTRACT Alginate (Alg) has a long history as a food ingredient in East Asia. However, the
17
human gut microbes responsible for the degradation of alginate and its derivatives have
18
not been fully understood yet. Here, we report that alginate and the low molecular
19
polymer derivatives of mannuronic acid oligosaccharides (MO) and guluronic acid
20
oligosaccharides (GO) can be completely degraded and utilized at various rates by fecal
21
microbiota obtained from six Chinese individuals. However, the derivative of propylene
22
glycol alginate sodium sulfate (PSS) was not hydrolyzed. The bacteria having a
23
pronounced ability to degrade Alg, MO and GO were isolated from human fecal
24
samples and were identified as Bacteroides ovatus, Bacteroides xylanisolvens, and
25
Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron. Alg, MO and GO can increase the production level of
26
short chain fatty acids (SCFA), but GO generates the highest level of SCFA. Our data
27
suggest that alginate and its derivatives could be degraded by specific bacteria in the
28
human gut, providing the basis for the impacts of alginate and its derivates as special
29
food additives on human health.
SC
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
30
RI PT
16
31
Key words: human gut microbiota, alginate and its derivatives, B. ovatus,
32
B. xylanisolvens, B. thetaiotaomicron, hydrolyze
2
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 33
INTRODUCTION Alginates are naturally occurring anionic copolymers of a linear β (1→4)-linked
35
glycuronan typically composed of residues of β-D-mannuronic acid (M) and its C-5
36
epimer α-L-guluronic acid (G) [1]. They are extracted from brown seaweed and have
37
been traditionally used as gelling agents in food, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, feeds, and
38
other industrial applications [2-4]. Under the natural growth condition, the following
39
three types of polymers are present in the alginate according to the block chemical
40
structures: poly β-D-mannuronic acid (MM), poly α-L-guluronic acid (GG) and
41
heteropolymer (MG), the latter contains random arranged residues of M and G,
42
Moreover, MM and GG demonstrate different gel forming properties compared to MG
43
[5]. Alginate oligosaccharides were reported to have various activities such as
44
antifungal activity [6], anti-inflammatory activity [7] and immunomodulatory activities
45
[8]. Propylene glycol alginate sodium sulfate (PSS), a drug against cardiovascular
46
disease, is a sulfated propylene glycol ester of low-molecular-weight alginate derivative.
47
As other edible dietary fibers, alginate and its oligomer derivatives are resistant to
48
the digestion by human endogenous enzymes, but can be utilized to a large extent by
49
human gut microbiota [9]. Wang et al. found that the alginate oligosaccharides prepared
50
through enzymatic hydrolysis of alginate enhanced the growth of intestinal
51
bifidobacteria and lactobacilli of male Wistar rats after feeding for two weeks [10].
52
Ramnani et al. [11] compared the fermentation patterns of three types of alginates with
53
molecular weight of 212 kDa, 97 kDa, and 38 kDa and found that alginate of 212 kDa
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
34
3
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT produced a significant increase in the total bacteria population and SCFA production.
55
However, the human colonic bacteria that respond to the degradation of alginate and
56
derivatives still remain unknown. It is desirable to investigate the fermentability of the
57
different components of alginate and their derivatives by human gut microbiota and
58
identify the degrading bacterial strains.
RI PT
54
In the current study, the fermentability of Alg, MO, GO and PSS by the gut
60
microbes obtained from six Chinese individuals were compared in batch culture
61
fermentation. The effects of the alginate and its derivatives on the bacterial composition
62
were also evaluated by PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE).
63
Four alginate and alginate oligosaccharides hydrolyzing bacteria, Bacteroides
64
xylanisolvens, Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, and two strains of Bacteroides ovatus
65
were also identified.
66
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TE D
M AN U
SC
59
Substrates. Alg with a molecular weight of 100 kD was purchased from Sangon
68
Biotech Company (Shanghai, China,). MO (with a molecular weight of 2.5 kD) and GO
69
(with a molecular weight of 4.0 kD) were obtained from Lantai Pharmaceutical
70
Company (Qingdao, China) and prepared by using the following method with some
71
modification [12]. In brief, alginate was hydrolyzed in 0.5 mol/L HCl at 100 °C for 8 h,
72
the fraction insoluble in the hydrolysate was solubilized at neutral pH, followed by pH
73
adjustment to 2.85. At this pH, the insoluble fraction G1 (G-rich fraction) was
74
subsequently separated from the soluble fraction by centrifugation. M1 (M-rich fraction)
AC C
EP
67
4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT was further isolated from the supernatant by fractionated precipitation at pH 1.50. MO
76
and GO were obtained after M1 and G1 had been hydrolyzed in 0.1 mol/L HCl at 100°C
77
for 3 h, then repeated fractionated precipitation at pH 2.85 and pH 1.50, respectively,
78
was performed. The purity of GO and MO were at least 90% based on the
79
monosaccharides
80
1-phenyl-3-methyl-5-pyrazolone by HPLC [13, 14]. PSS, a derivative of alginate, with
81
the molecular weight of 10-20 kD, was provided by Dalian Aosen Pharmaceutical
82
corporation Ltd (Dalian, China). The structures of Alg, MO, GO and PSS were showed
83
in Figure 1.
using
pre-column
derivation
with
M AN U
SC
analysis
RI PT
75
Fecal sample preparation. Fecal samples were provided by six healthy human
85
volunteers (aged 22 to 35 years). All volunteers provided informed, written consent, and
86
the study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Zhejiang Academy of
87
Agricultural Sciences. The donors had not received antibiotics, probiotics, prebiotics, or
88
synbiotics treatments for at least three months prior to sample collection. After
89
collection, the fresh fecal samples were immediately homogenized in stomacher bags
90
with 0.1 M anaerobic phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.0) to create 20% (wt/vol)
91
slurries. Large food residues were removed by passing the mixture through a 0.4 mm
92
sieve, and the suspensions were used as inocula.
AC C
EP
TE D
84
93
Batch culture fermentation of alginate and its derivatives with human fecal
94
slurries. The effect of alginate and its derivatives on the composition of gut microbiota
95
and fermentation properties were evaluated by using the batch culture fermentation 5
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT described as Lei et al [15]. In brief, 100 ml serum bottles contained 63 ml distilled
97
anaerobic medium VI with the following ingredients (g/L): peptone, 3.0; tryptone, 3.0;
98
yeast extract, 4.5; bile salts no. 3, 0.4; NaCl, 4.5; L-cysteine, 0.8; Hemin, 0.05; KCl, 2.5;
99
KH2PO4, 0.4; MgCl2·6H2O, 4.5; CaCl2·6H2O, 0.2; resazurin, 0.25; Tween 80, 1 ml.
100
Two milliliters of a solution of trace elements (g/L) containing MgSO4·7H2O, 3.0;
101
MnCl2·4H2O, 0.32; FeSO4·7H2O, 0.1; CoSO4·7H2O, 0.18; CaCl2·2H2O, 0.1;
102
ZnSO4·7H2O, 0.18; CuSO4·5H2O, 0.01 and NiCl2·6H2O, 0.092 was also added. To
103
assess the degradation and utilization of alginate and its derivatives by human fecal
104
microbiota, 5.0 g/L of Alg, 8 g/L of MO, GO or PSS were added as the sole carbon
105
source and the medium without any carbon substances was used as a control. The final
106
pH 6.5 was adjusted by adding 1 M HCl. After being autoclaved, the medium
107
maintained its anaerobic condition by placing the hot bottle into the anaerobic cabinet
108
(anaerobic workstation AW 500, Electrotek Ltd., UK). The human fecal slurry (7 ml)
109
was inoculated into the serum bottle containing growth medium and the bottle incubated
110
at 37 °C for 48 h in anaerobic chamber. Samples were removed at 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, and
111
48 h for further analysis. The pH value after 48 h fermentation was measured by pH
112
probe (Eutech, Singapore).
SC
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
113
RI PT
96
Analysis of carbohydrates degradation. To evaluate the degradation of alginate
114
and its derivatives, thin layer chromatography (TLC) was used [16]. Samples (0.2 µl)
115
were loaded on a pre-coated silica gel-60 TLC aluminum plates (Merck, Germany).
116
After development with a solvent system consisting of n-butanol/formic acid/water 6
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 117
(4:6:1 (v:v:v)), the plates were stained by dipping in the orcinol reagent (900 mg of
118
orcinol, 25 ml of H2O, 375 ml of cool ethanol, 50 ml of concentrated sulfuric acid) and
119
visualized by heating at 105 ℃ for 5 minutes. SCFA analysis. Analysis of SCFA was carried out by HPLC [17]. Fermentation
121
samples obtained at 48 h was centrifuged at 14,000 g and the supernatant (20 µl) was
122
subjected to Agilent 1260 infinity HPLC system (Agilent Scientific, USA). The SCFA
123
was analyzed using HPLC on an ion-exclusion Aminex HPX-87H (7.8 × 300 mm;
124
Bio-Rad, UK) with 0.005 mol/l H2SO4 at a flow rate of 0.6 ml/min at 50 °C. The
125
detection wavelength was set to 215 nm.
M AN U
SC
RI PT
120
DNA extraction and PCR-DGGE analysis. Bacterial genomic DNA from
127
fermentation samples obtained at 0 and 48 h were extracted respectively using a
128
QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Qiagen,
129
Germany). The concentration of extracted DNA was determined using a NanoDrop
130
ND-2000 (NanoDrop Technologies, USA), and its integrity and size were confirmed by
131
agar gel electrophoresis (1.0%).
EP
AC C
132
TE D
126
For analysis of the microbial communities, the V3 region of the 16S rRNA gene
133
(positions 341 to 534 of the Escherichia coli gene) of all fermentations at 0 and 48 h
134
was analyzed using PCR-DGGE, as described previously [15, 18, 19]. DGGE was
135
performed using a DCode universal mutation detection system (Bio-Rad, USA) in an
136
8% (wt/vol) polyacrylamide gel containing a linear 35-65% denaturant gradient with a
137
constant voltage of 200 V at 60 °C for 4 h [19]. The gels were then visualized by 7
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 138
staining with SYBR green I nucleic acid (Sigma, USA) for 45 min and washing twice
139
with deionized water. Blocks of polyacrylamide gels containing selected DGGE bands were cut with a
141
sterile scalpel. The blocks were then transferred in 40 µl of sterile water, and the DNA
142
of the bands was allowed to diffuse overnight at 4 °C. The water containing the eluted
143
DNA was used for the reamplification. The PCR products were purified and cloned in
144
PMD-18T vector (Takara, China). Three colonies were selected per DGGE band and
145
sequenced by Shanghai Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Searches in the
146
NCBI database were performed with the BLAST program to identify the closest known
147
relatives of the partial 16S rRNA sequence obtained [20, 21].
M AN U
SC
RI PT
140
Statistical analysis. The DGGE gels were analyzed using Quantity One software
149
(Bio-Rad, USA) with a match tolerance of 2% to compare the community structures of
150
controls, Alg, MO and GO. After matching all bands in each lane, Richness (S) values
151
were calculated as the number of DNA bands detected in the respective line of the
152
DGGE profile, while the Shannon-Wiener index (H) and evenness (E) values were
153
calculated according to the equations H= −∑Pi (ln Pi) and EH= H/Hmax= H/lnS,
154
respectively, where Pi is the ratio between the specific band intensity and the total
155
intensity of all bands and S is the total number of bands in each sample.
AC C
EP
TE D
148
156
The pH value and SCFAs of each fermentation sample were measured. Means and
157
standard deviations (SD) were calculated. Differences were separately assessed using
158
the unpaired two-tailed Student t test; P values of 0.05 were considered statistically 8
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 159
significant. Isolation and identification of alginate and its derivatives degradation bacteria.
161
Two grams of fresh fecal sample No. 1 and No. 4 were homogenized separately in
162
stomacher bags with 10 ml of 0.1 M anaerobic PBS (pH 7.0) to produce 20% (wt/vol)
163
slurries. 7 ml of slurry was inoculated into 63 ml of VI growth medium containing 5 g/L
164
of Alg. After incubation in the medium at 37 °C for 24 h in an anaerobic chamber,
165
fermentation samples were spread on an Alg agar plate (basic growth medium VI plus 5
166
g/L Alg and 15 g/L agar) using a 10-fold dilution method. Thirty single colonies each
167
for both No. 1 and No. 4 were randomly picked and re-inoculated into VI-Alg growth
168
medium separately. Alg degradation was assessed using TLC analysis of the
169
supernatant. Positive colonies were inoculated into growth medium separately
170
containing Alg (5 g/L), GO and MO (8 g/L), and incubated at 37 °C for 192 h in
171
anaerobic chamber. A total of 300 µl of sample were removed at 0, 12, 24, 48, 96, 144,
172
and 192 h for analysis of carbohydrate degradation respectively.
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
160
The isolates that demonstrated an ability to degrade Alg and its derivatives were
174
identified by sequencing their 16S rRNA gene. Briefly, genomic DNA was extracted
175
and
176
(5′-CAGAGTTTGATCCTGGCT-3′) and 1492R (5′-AGGAGGTGATCCAGCCGCA-3′)
177
[22]. DNA sequencing was conducted by Shanghai Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai,
178
China). Bacterial species were identified using aligned 16S rRNA sequences with the
179
BLAST server (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) of the National Center for
AC C
173
the
16S
rRNA
gene
was
amplified
9
by
PCR
with
primers
27F
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 180
Biotechnology Information (NCBI).
181
RESULTS Comparative utilization of alginate and its derivatives by six human fecal
183
samples. The degradation of alginate and its derivatives by fecal microbiota obtained
184
from six volunteers was determined by TLC and presented in Figure 2. In general, Alg,
185
MO and GO could be completely degraded into oligosaccharides or monosaccharide
186
after 24 h fermentation by human fecal microbiota, but the rates of degradation, which
187
was evidenced as the time point for disappears of the original dot on TLC plates, varied
188
between the tested substrates. GO was degraded slower than Alg and MO, as the
189
original GO dots were disappeared after 12 hours incubation in 4 out of 6 tested fecal
190
samples (Figure 2C), whiles the Alg and MO dots were completely disappeared after 6
191
hours for most of the samples (Figure 2A and 2B). PSS, which is a sulfated propylene
192
glycol ester of low-molecular-weight alginate, was resistant to the degradation by the
193
human gut microbiota (Figure 2D). No dots were observed in the control group,
194
indicating that no carbohydrate was presented in the blank culture medium.
SC
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
195
RI PT
182
pH value and SCFA production in vitro fermentation. The pH value of the
196
fermentation of different substances was varied significantly (Table 1). Compared to the
197
control group, the pH values of fermentation with Alg, MO and GO were all decreased.
198
GO produced the lowest pH with a mean value of 5.96. In contrast, the pH value of PSS
199
was nearly unchanged, which confirmed the TLC results that it was not degraded.
200
The concentration of SCFA produced during the fermentation after 48 h is shown in 10
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Table 1. The SCFA mainly included acetic, propionic and butyric acid. Compared to the
202
control group, the fermentation of all substances except PSS showed a significant
203
increase in acetate, propionate, and butyrate production, indicating that these substances
204
were produced by the human gut microbiota. Acetate was the predominant SCFA
205
produced during the fermentation, with the concentration at 40-50 mM. For these
206
different substances, GO produced the highest levels of acetate (52.4 mM), propionate
207
(23.2 mM) and butyrate (20.8 mM) (P < 0.05), while MO was similar to alginate in the
208
concentration of the SCFA. PSS produced almost the same level of SCFA as the control
209
group, which was in accord with the result of pH value and indicated that PSS was not
210
fermented by the gut microbiota. The molar ratios of acetate, propionate, and butyrate
211
were consistent between the control group and PSS, but an increase was observed in the
212
molar ratio of acetate after Alg, MO and GO fermentation, while the proportion of
213
butyrate was slightly decreased (Table 1).
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
201
The effects of alginate and its derivatives fermentation on the structures of
215
bacterial communities analyzed by PCR-DGGE profiles. The PCR-DGGE profiles
216
of bacterial 16s rRNA V3 region after the fermentation of Alg, MO, GO and PSS were
217
showed in Figure 3. As previously reported [23, 24], the community structures of gut
218
microbiota from individuals were varied remarkably, and supplement of carbohydrates
219
into the growth medium could influence the compositions of the community structures
220
of microbiota. Compared with the control group, both the Richness and
221
Shannon-Wiener index (Table 3) of Alg, MO and GO groups were improved, indicated
AC C
EP
214
11
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT that alginate and its derivates could sustain the growth of human gut bacteria. Unlike
223
other substrates, the concentrations of DNA extracted from PSS fermentations by six
224
human fecal slurries were very low. There were no bands after PCR amplification of the
225
16s rDNA V3 region. We assume that the lack of PCR products is likely caused by PSS
226
as either blocking the extraction of DNA or inhibiting the growth of the microbiota.
RI PT
222
The enriched bacterial species were identified by sequencing the bands on
228
PCR-DGGE gel (Table 2). Bacteroides xylanisolvens (band a) was found in the samples
229
of No. 1, No. 2, No. 3, No. 5, and No. 6 after fermentation with Alg, MO, and GO;
230
Clostridium clostridioforme/ Clostridium symbiosum (band d) was found in all of the
231
fermentations; Bacteroides finegoldii (band k) and Shigella flexneri/ Escherichia coli/
232
Escherichia fergusonii (band j) were detected in half of the fermentation samples;
233
Bacteroides ovatus (band n) was also found in two samples, which indicated these
234
bacteria may be associated with the degradation and utilization of alginate and its
235
derivatives.
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
227
Isolation of the degradation bacteria for alginate and its derivatives. Fecal
237
sample No. 1 and No. 4 were selected further to isolate the degradation bacteria, the
238
fecal culture (150 µl), which had been grown in medium containing Alg for 24 h, was
239
spread on Alg agar plates to isolate the Alg hydrolyzing bacterium. Total of 41 (No. 1)
240
and 52 (No. 4) colonies were obtained from 7-fold dilution plates respectively. Thirty
241
colonies each for both No. 1 and No. 4 were picked up from the Alg agar plates and
242
then re-inoculated into growth medium containing Alg. TLC analysis was conducted
AC C
236
12
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT after 96 h incubation in Alg containing medium. TLC patterns indicated that the Alg
244
substrate had been obviously degraded from the supernatant of two isolates G19 and
245
G25 for No.1 and two isolates A9 and A12 for No.4, suggesting that they may be the
246
Alg degrading bacteria (Figure 4). Further incubation and TLC pattern analysis
247
suggested that MO and GO could also be degraded by G19 and G25 (Figure 4). After
248
sequencing 16S rRNA from the four strains, G19 and G25 were identified as
249
Bacteroides ovatus G19 and Bacteroides xylanisolvens G25, A9 and A12 were
250
identified as Bacteroides ovatus A9 and B. thetaiotaomicron A12 respectively (all
251
showing ≥ 99% similarity under BLAST at the NCBI database). The sequences were
252
submitted to NCBI under the accession number KM396275, KP202688, KT452899, and
253
KT452900.
254
DISCUSSION
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
243
The human gut is inhabited by 1014 microbes, including 1,000 to 1,150 phylotypes
256
[25]. Significant variations in the composition of colonic microbiota exist among
257
individuals [23]. In this way, the ability to degrade and utilize complex polysaccharides
258
may vary among the individuals due to the different compositions of gut microbiota.
259
Previous results showed that the degradation of agarose and agaro-oligosaccharides by
260
human gut microbiota was significantly different between individuals [24]. The present
261
data confirmed that Alg, MO and GO could be hydrolyzed by all of the six human fecal
262
samples tested, but at different degradation rates. For example, No. 6 fecal sample
263
showed the slowest degradation rates on all of the substrates. Moreover, the chemical
AC C
EP
255
13
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT structures of alginate also influence the rates of degradation. As demonstrated in Figure
265
2, degradation of GO is more difficult than MO and Alg by human gut microbiota. That
266
may be ascribed to the different chemical structures of fermented substrates. MM block
267
is formed from equatorial groups at C-1 and C-4; therefore, it is a relatively straight
268
polymer looking like a flat ribbon. In contrast, the GG block is formed from axial
269
groups at both C-1 and C-4. Therefore, the chain of GG is buckled (Figure 1). The
270
difference in the configuration of chemical structures leads to the formation of different
271
gel properties. For example, GG block forms more rigid gels [26], whereas the MM
272
block tends to form softer gels. The configuration difference may explain the reason
273
why the degradation of GO is more difficult than MO and Alg. Among the tested
274
carbohydrates, PSS cannot be degraded completely. PSS is the hydrolyzed fragment of
275
alginate that is further esterified by propylene epoxide and chlorosulfonic acid;
276
therefore, the change in chemical structure, particularly the introduction of sulfate may
277
block the degradation by human gut microbiota.
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
264
Bacteroides and Clostridium were the predominant bacteria in human gut
279
microbiota, which could help the host decompose polysaccharides and improve the
280
efficiency of nutrition [27]. In the present study, Bacteroides xylanisolvens, Bacteroides
281
ovatus, Clostridium clostridioforme, Bacteroides finegoldii and Shigella flexneri were
282
identified on the PCR-DGGE profiles, suggesting that they may be related to the
283
utilization of Alg, MO and GO. The following isolation experiment confirmed that B.
284
xylanisolvens and B. ovatus were involved in the degradation of alginate and its
AC C
278
14
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT derivatives because both of them could hydrolyze Alg, MO and GO in vitro. B.
286
thetaiotaomicron is also a common gut bacterium able to degrade polysaccharides. The
287
genome sequence and proteome analysis showed B. thetaiotaomicron contains 261
288
glycoside hydrolases and polysaccharide lyases[28]. Here, we showed that B.
289
thetaiotaomicron is involved in the alginate degradation.
RI PT
285
SCFA produced from fermentation of carbohydrates by human gut microbiota
291
have a range of physiological and immunological effects on colonic homeostasis and
292
health [29-31]. In the current study, alginate and its derivates can be fermented by
293
human gut bacteria to produce SCFA. It is interesting to note that although Alg, MO
294
and GO can increase the SCFA production levels significantly, the slow fermented GO
295
produces the highest level of SCFA, which was in accordance with the previous report
296
that slow-fermenting substrates may provide more SCFA to the distal colon than
297
fast-fermenting substrates[32, 33]. The current results suggest that compared to Alg and
298
MO, GO may possess a better potential application as a prebiotic and to regulate the
299
colonic health.
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
300
SC
290
B. ovatus has been associated with immunogenicity. Mice immunized with B.
301
ovatus D-6 in the absence of adjuvants develop specific anti-TFa IgM and IgG
302
antibodies [34]. Moreover, monocolonization with B. ovatus could also protect the
303
immunodeficient SCID mice from mortality in chronic intestinal inflammation, caused
304
by long-lasting dextran sodium sulfate treatment [35]. B. xylanisolvens is a
305
xylan-degrading bacterium isolated from human feces [36], Ulsemer [37, 38] studied 15
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT the safety of a Bacteroides xylanisolvens strain (DSM 23964) recently and reported that
307
it is safe and tolerated by healthy human individuals. Alg, MO and GO was mainly
308
extracted from Laminaria japonica, which is commonly consumed as food worldwide
309
for hundreds of years and has been established as healthy food materials that are rich in
310
minerals and dietary fibers. Our data present new evidence suggesting that alginate and
311
its derivates could be degraded by special bacteria in the human gut microbiota. Further
312
study will carry out to evaluate the impacts of alginate and its derivates plus with their
313
degrading bacteria on host health.
314
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
M AN U
SC
RI PT
306
This work was supported in part by National Natural Science Foundation of China
316
(31370156 and 31070724), NSFC-Shandong Joint Fund for Marine Science Research
317
Centers (U1406402), National Science & Technology Support Program of China
318
(2013BAB01B02), Taishan Scholars Project Special Funds, and the Special Fund for
319
Marine Scientific Research in the Public Interest (201005024).
AC C
EP
TE D
315
16
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
M AN U
SC
RI PT
320
321
EP
TE D
Figure 1 Chemical structures of Alg, MO, GO and PSS
AC C
322
17
325
Figure 2 Degradation of Alg (A), MO (B), GO (C), and PSS (D) by fecal slurries of six
EP
324
volunteers in batch fermentation. Results were analyzed by TLC.
AC C
323
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
18
326
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Figure 3 PCR-DGGE profiles of in vitro fermentation of Alg, MO and GO by gut microbiota
328
from six volunteers. Lanes 1-5 are: original inoculum, control and fermentation of Alg, MO and GO
329
by fecal slurry obtained from No. 1 volunteer after 48 h. Line 6-10, 11-15, 16-20, 21-25 and 26-30
330
are the fermentation samples with the same order as described for Lanes 1-5, but inoculated with the
331
fecal slurries obtained from Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 volunteers, respectively. Lettered bands were
332
sequenced and BLAST with the NCBI database.
AC C
EP
327
19
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
TE D
xylanisolvens G25 (B), Bacteroides ovatus A9 (C) and Bacteroides. thetaiotaomicron A12 (D).
EP
335
Figure 4 Degradation of Alg, MO and GO by Bacteroides ovatus G19 (A), Bacteroides
AC C
334
M AN U
333
20
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 336
Table 1 pH value and SCFA production after fermentation of Alg, GO, MO and PSS for 48 h of
337
culture by six human fecal microbiota in batch culture Mean SCFA concentration (mM) pH value Acetate
Propionate
Butyrate
6.44±0.11
30.1±2.4
17.0±3.5
15.4±3.2
Alg
6.24±0.11*
41.3±5.8*
21.0±2.4*
16.4±3.1
MO
6.00±0.12*
41.8±3.6*
19.5±3.6
18.9±3.9
GO
5.96±0.13*
52.4±3.7*
23.2±4.5*
20.8±3.7*
PSS
6.47±0.10
30.2±4.8
18.3±1.1
15.3±2.2
Total
48:27:25
62.5±5.1
53:27:21
78.6±5.9*
52:24:24
80.2±7.4*
54:24:22
96.4±7.3*
47:29:24
63.8±4.8
M AN U
SC
Control
Molar ratio
RI PT
Substrates#
Data are shown as means ± SD; #: Alg, Alginate; MO, oligo-β-D-mannuronic acid;GO,
339
oligo-α-L-guluronic acid; PSS, Propylene glycol alginate sodium sulfate; Control, control group
340
without adding carbohydrates in the medium. *P < 0.05 by two-tailed Student t test compared to the
341
control group
AC C
EP
TE D
338
21
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
342
Table 2 The BLAST results of the lettered bands Bands
Similar species
identity
a
Bacteroides xylanisolvens
100%
b
Bacteroides sp. HGA0251 Ruminococcaceae bacterium,
100% 100%
Clostridiales bacterium, Firmicutes bacterium
Clostridium clostridioforme, Clostridium symbiosum
100%
e
Clostridium propionicum
100%
f
Sutterella sp.
g
Lachnospiraceae bacterium, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii
100%
h
Parasutterella excrementihominis
100%
i
Barnesiella intestinihominis, Bacteroidetes bacterium
100%
j
Shigella flexneri, Escherichia coli, Escherichia fergusonii
100%
k
Bacteroides finegoldii
100%
l
Bacteroides uniformis, Bacteroides sp. S461
100%
m
Bacteroides finegoldii
99%
M AN U
SC
100%
n
Bacteroides ovatus
o
Parabacteroides distasonis
TE D
100% 100%
Table 3 Diversity indices calculated from the DGGE bands profiles generated from V3 region Group
Richness (S)
Alg MO
AC C
GO
12.67±2.88
Shannon-Wiener index (H)
Evenness (E)
3.49±0.39
0.96±0.03
15.83±2.32*
3.77±0.38
0.95±0.05
16.67±1.03*
3.89±0.16*
0.96±0.03
15.00±1.55
3.66±0.24
0.94±0.04
EP
Control
347
100%
d
343 344 345 346
RI PT
c
*significant increase compared to the control group, P < 0.05
22
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
348
References:
349
[1] Fischer FG, Dörfel H. Die Polyuronsäuren der Braunalgen (Kohlenhydrate der Algen I). Hoppe-Seyler´ s Zeitschrift für physiologische Chemie 1955;302:186-203.
RI PT
[2] Ahmad Z, Khuller GK. Alginate-based sustained release drug delivery systems for tuberculosis. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2008;5:1323-34.
[3] Yu CY, Yin BC, Zhang W, Cheng SX, Zhang XZ, Zhuo RX. Composite microparticle drug delivery systems based on chitosan, alginate and pectin with improved pH-sensitive drug release property. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2009;68:245-9.
SC
[4] Koyama MSAT. Marine medicinal foods: implications and applications, macro and microalgae. Advances in food and nutrition research. Volume 64 ed. New York: Academic Press; 2011. [5] Morris ER, Rees DA, Thom D. Characterization of polysaccharide structure and interactions by circular 1973:245-6.
M AN U
dichroism: order–disorder transition in the calcium alginate system. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. [6] Tondervik A, Sletta H, Klinkenberg G, Emanuel C, Powell LC, Pritchard MF, et al. Alginate oligosaccharides inhibit fungal cell growth and potentiate the activity of antifungals against Candida and Aspergillus spp. PLoS One 2014;9:e112518.
[7] Zhou R, Shi X, Gao Y, Cai N, Jiang Z, Xu X. Anti-inflammatory Activity of Guluronate Oligosaccharides Obtained by Oxidative Degradation from Alginate in Lipopolysaccharide-Activated Murine Macrophage RAW 264.7 Cells. J Agric Food Chem 2015;63,160-8.
TE D
[8] Xu X, Wu X, Wang Q, Cai N, Zhang H, Jiang Z, et al. Immunomodulatory Effects of Alginate Oligosaccharides on Murine Macrophage RAW264.7 Cells and Their Structure-Activity Relationships. J Agric Food Chem 2014;62,3168-76.
[9] Devillé C, Gharbi M, Dandrifosse G, Peulen O. Study on the effects of laminarin, a polysaccharide from seaweed, on gut characteristics. J Sci Food Agr 2007;87:1717-25.
EP
[10] Wang Y, Han F, Hu B, Li J, Yu W. In vivo prebiotic properties of alginate oligosaccharides prepared through enzymatic hydrolysis of alginate. Nutr Res 2006;26:597-603. [11] Ramnani P, Chitarrari R, Tuohy K, Grant J, Hotchkiss S, Philp K, et al. In vitro fermentation and prebiotic potential of novel low molecular weight polysaccharides derived from agar and alginate seaweeds.
AC C
350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385
Anaerobe 2012;18:1-6.
[12] HAUG A, LARSEN BR. Quantitative determination of the uronic acid composition of alginates. Acta chem scand 1962;16:1908-18.
[13] Wang J, Zhao X, Yu G, Li G, Hao C. Analysis polysaccharides by precolumn derivatization Journal
of
of
high
uronic acid compositions in marine brown alga performance
liquid
chromatography. Chinese
Analytical 2009;5:648-52.
[14] Honda S, Akao E, Suzuki S, Okuda M, Kakehi K, Nakamura J. High-performance liquid chromatography of reducing carbohydrates as strongly ultraviolet-absorbing and electrochemically sensitive 1-phenyl-3-methyl-5-pyrazolone derivatives. Anal Biochem 1989;180:351-7. 23
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
[15] Lei F, Yin Y, Wang Y, Deng B, Yu HD, Li L, et al. Higher-level production of volatile fatty acids in vitro by chicken gut microbiotas than by human gut microbiotas as determined by functional analyses. Appl Environ Microbiol 2012;78:5763-72. [16] Zhang Z, Yu G, Zhao X, Liu H, Guan H, Lawson AM, et al. Sequence analysis of alginate-derived oligosaccharides by negative-ion electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. J Am Soc Mass Spectr
RI PT
2006;17:621-30.
[17] Olano-Martin E, Mountzouris KC, Gibson GR, Rastall RA. In vitro fermentability of dextran, oligodextran and maltodextrin by human gut bacteria. Br J Nutr 2000;83:247-55.
[18] Holben WE, Feris KP, Kettunen A, Apajalahti JH. GC fractionation enhances microbial community diversity assessment and detection
of minority populations of bacteria by denaturing gradient gel
SC
electrophoresis. Appl Environ Microbiol 2004;70:2263-70.
[19] Li M, Wang B, Zhang M, Rantalainen M, Wang S, Zhou H, et al. Symbiotic gut microbes modulate human metabolic phenotypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008;105:2117-22.
M AN U
[20] Rantsiou K, Urso R, Iacumin L, Cantoni C, Cattaneo P, Comi G, et al. Culture-dependent and -independent methods to investigate the microbial ecology of Italian fermented sausages. Appl Environ Microbiol 2005;71:1977-86.
[21] Dolci P, Alessandria V, Rantsiou K, Rolle L, Zeppa G, Cocolin L. Microbial dynamics of Castelmagno PDO, a traditional Italian cheese, with a focus on lactic acid bacteria ecology. Int J Food Microbiol 2008;122:302-11.
[22] Franco W, Perez-Diaz IM, Johanningsmeier SD, McFeeters RF. Characteristics of spoilage-associated secondary cucumber fermentation. Appl Environ Microbiol 2012;78:1273-84.
TE D
[23] Turroni F, Foroni E, Pizzetti P, Giubellini V, Ribbera A, Merusi P, et al. Exploring the diversity of the bifidobacterial population in the human intestinal tract. Appl Environ Microbiol 2009;75:1534-45. [24] Li M, Li G, Zhu L, Yin Y, Zhao X, Xiang C, et al. Isolation and characterization of an agaro-oligosaccharide (AO)-hydrolyzing bacterium from the gut microflora of Chinese individuals. PLoS One 2014;9:e91106.
EP
[25] Qin J, Li R, Raes J, Arumugam M, Burgdorf KS, Manichanh C, et al. A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature 2010;464:59-65. [26] Grant GT, Morris ER, Rees DA, Smith PJ, Thom D. Biological interactions between polysaccharides and divalent cations: the egg-box model. Febs Lett 1973;32:195-8.
AC C
386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424
[27] Backhed F, Ding H, Wang T, Hooper LV, Koh GY, Nagy A, et al. The gut microbiota as an environmental factor that regulates fat storage. Science Signalling 2004;101:15718. [28] Xu J, Bjursell MK, Himrod J, Deng S, Carmichael LK, Chiang HC, et al. A genomic view of the human-Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron symbiosis. Science 2003;299:2074-6. [29] Duncan SH, Louis P, Flint HJ. Lactate-utilizing bacteria, isolated from human feces, that produce butyrate as a major fermentation product. Appl Environ Microbiol 2004;70:5810-7. [30] Smith PM, Howitt MR, Panikov N, Michaud M, Gallini CA, Bohlooly-Y M, et al. The microbial metabolites, short-chain fatty acids, regulate colonic Treg cell homeostasis. Science 2013;341:569-73. [31] Pryde SE, Duncan SH, Hold GL, Stewart CS, Flint HJ. The microbiology of butyrate formation in the 24
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
human colon. Fems Microbiol Lett 2002;217:133-9. [32] Rose DJ, Keshavarzian A, Patterson JA, Venkatachalam M, Gillevet P, Hamaker BR. Starch-entrapped microspheres extend in vitro fecal fermentation, increase butyrate production, and influence microbiota pattern. Mol Nutr Food Res 2009;53 Suppl 1:S121-30. [33] Timm DA, Stewart ML, Hospattankar A, Slavin JL. Wheat dextrin, psyllium, and inulin produce distinct
RI PT
fermentation patterns, gas volumes, and short-chain fatty acid profiles in vitro. J Med Food 2010;13:961-6. [34] Ulsemer P, Henderson G, Toutounian K, Loffler A, Schmidt J, Karsten U, et al. Specific humoral immune response to the Thomsen-Friedenreich tumor antigen (CD176) in mice after vaccination with the commensal bacterium Bacteroides ovatus D-6. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2013;62:875-87.
[35] Hudcovic T, Kozakova H, Kolinska J, Stepankova R, Hrncir T, Tlaskalova-Hogenova H.
SC
Monocolonization with Bacteroides ovatus protects immunodeficient SCID mice from mortality in chronic intestinal inflammation caused by long-lasting dextran sodium sulfate treatment. Physiol Res 2009;58:101-10. [36] Chassard C, Delmas E, Lawson PA, Bernalier-Donadille A. Bacteroides xylanisolvens sp. nov., a
M AN U
xylan-degrading bacterium isolated from human faeces. Int J Syst Evol Micr 2008;58:1008-13. [37] Ulsemer P, Toutounian K, Schmidt J, Karsten U, Goletz S. Preliminary safety evaluation of a new Bacteroides xylanisolvens isolate. Appl Environ Microbiol 2012;78:528-35.
[38] Ulsemer P, Toutounian K, Kressel G, Schmidt J, Karsten U, Hahn A, et al. Safety and tolerance of
EP
TE D
Bacteroides xylanisolvens DSM 23964 in healthy adults. Benef Microbes 2012;3:99-111.
AC C
425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443
25
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Human gut microbiota degrade alginate and its oligosaccharides Bacteria identified for degrading alginate and its oligosaccharides are Bacteroides
RI PT
Alginate and its oligosaccharides increase the production level of
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
SCFA