Cytologia
Irradiation
Studies
on
the
I. X-Rays
Karyology
and
Y. S. R. K. Sarma Laboratory
of Algal Banaras
Received
October,
Cytology Hindu
1977
of Charophyta
gamma-rays and
S. B. Singh
and Cytogenetics,
University,
42: 279-290,
Department
Varanasi-221005,
of Botany,
India
18 1975
The studies on the effcts of X-rays and gamma-rays on algae are still in their infancy as compared with those on higher plants. The few contributions that have been made so far show that certain algae possess an extra-ordinarily high degree of resistence. Godward (1954) for the first time employed X-rays to study their effect on algal chromosomes. Since then several workers contributed further to our knowledge on this aspect of algal cytogenetics (Jacobson 1957, Prasad and Godward 1968, Dodge and Godward 1963, Sarma and Khan 1967, Patel 1970 etc.). While most of these studies established that higher doses of X-radiation were required to bring about chromosomal aberrations in algae as compared to higher plants, such aberrations were successfully induced by X-rays at low dose ranges by Howard and Horsley (1960) in Oedogonium cardiacum and by Sarma and Khan (1967) in Nitella flagelliformis. Earlier studies on the effects of gamma-radiation on algal chromosomes are fewer as compared with those on X-rays and include those made by Rayns and Godward (unpub.), Gailey and Tolbert (1958), and Leedale (1958). Their obser vations also show that the algal chromosomes are very resistant to gamma-rays. However, Sarma and Singh (1974) reported that the chromosomes of Nitella flagel liformis were affected in much the same way as those of angiosperms in response to gamma-radiation. In the present study, a concerted attempt has been made to assessing the effects of X-rays and gamma-rays on the karyology of some taxa belonging to Characeae, particularly appreciably
selected as experimental materials, since these taxa are characterised by long chromosomes. The latter feature is of great advantage in making
qualitative and quantitative studies of the effects of irradiation on the chromosomes of these taxa and in helping to determine the levels of sensitivity of different taxa towards the X and gamma-radiations. Materials
and methods
The experimental materials which consisted of three species of Nitella (N. opaca Ag., N. flagelliformis (A. Br.) R. D. W., and N. accuminata (A. Br.) ex. Wallm and four species of Chara (C. fibrosa Ag. ex. Bruz. em. R. D. W., C. globularis var. virgata (Kutz.) R. D. W., C. setosa Klein ex. Wild and C, zeylanica var. diaphana f. oerstediana (A. Br.) R. D. W.) were collected from some fresh water ponds situated at Sarnath and Bawan Pokhara in the vicinity of Varanasi. The selected plants
280
Y. S. R. K. Sarma and S. B. Singh
Cytologia
42
were brought to the laboratory in the same pond water in which they were growing in natural environment and were transferred to biphasic (soil-water) culture medium for further study. For and
irradiation
placed
experiments,
in different
were
then
with
X-rays,
exposed
to X-rays
the X-ray
tube
at a distance
of 15cm.
experiments
with gamma-rays,
gamma-rays radiations different ments
doses
5ml.
and gamma-rays
size were of filtered
as the case
was run at 100Kv,
The exposure
were
4mA
may
with
with
the
and
those
Radiation
of the doses
by increasing
carried
the
be.
materials
were
Laboratory,
with X-rays
were carried
Table
of 1mm
Al
exposed
to 80Co
All the
experi
Department
of
out in the Department
of Medical
and gamma-rays
For irradiation
the both types of experiments. The
of exposure.
Institute
which
For the irradiation
time
Medicine,
selected
water
a filtration
out in the Cytogenetics with gamma-rays
carefully pond
rate was 200 rads per min.
petriplates
obtained
were
B. H. U., while
of Radiotherapy The details
of suitable
containing
at a distance of 60cm from the source. With dose range varied from 100 to 2000 rads in various
with X-rays
Zoology,
antheridia
petridishes
Sciences,
are given in Table
B. H.
U.
1.
1.
After irradiation the irradiated materials were fixed at different intervals of time (12, 36, 60 and 84 hr following irradiation) in Carnoy's fixative (3 parts of absolute alcohol and 1 part of glacial acetic acid). The fixed materials were cytolo gically examined by employing Godward's iron alum acetocarmine method (God ward 1948) throughout the course of this investigation. Observations
The chromosome numbers recorded in the present work of the taxa viz., N. opaca (n=6), N. flagelliformis (n=9), N. acuminata (n=18), C. fibrosa (n=14), C. globularis var. virgata (n=14), C. setosa (n=28) and C. zeylanica var. diaphora (n=42) are confirmatory of the findings of Hotchkiss (1963, 1966), Guerlesquin (1964, 1967), Khan and Sarma (1967) and Chatterjee (1972). The karyological
effect on the interphase
and dividing
filaments as a result The most frequently
of irradiation were qualitatively observed effects commonly met
varying
stickiness
laggards,
degrees unequal
were
separation
and
clumping
of daughter
nuclei
and quantitatively with in most of the
of chromosomes,
chromosomes
of spermatogenous
anaphase
to the two
poles,
studied. taxa to bridges, grouping
1977
Irradiation
of chromosomes, nuclei
and For
gamma-rays at metaphase breakage
granulation
occasional the
purpose
and
formation
vacuolization
effects. of X-rays
of interphase
281
nuclei,
degenerating
of micronuclei.
of quantitative
estimates
of different taxa, the effects under and anaphase stages on the basis
at metaphase
of cytological highest dose
Studies on the Karyology of Charophyta I
and anaphase,
of the
effectiveness
of X-rays
and
each of the treatment were estimated of affected cells showing chromosome
and anaphase
bridges
as the main
indicators
The percentage of affected cells at lowest effective dose and and gamma-rays administered in all the taxa are given in
Table 2. Controls were main tained in all the cases. Since the percentages of affected cells with X-rays and gamma-rays at any given dose in a particular taxon were differing only slight ly (cf. Table 2), the results of all the experiments with gamma radiation for all the taxa in vestigated are presented through histograms (Figs. H1 H7).
282
Y. S. R. K. Sarma and S. B. Singh
Cytologia
42
Figs. H1-H7. Hi, histogram showing percentage of affected cells in Nitella opaca subjected to gamma radiation. H2, histogram showing percentage of affected cells in Nitella ftagelliformis subjected to gamma radiation. H3, histogram showing percentage of affected cells in Nitella ac uminata subjected to gamma radiation. H4, histogram showing percentage of affected cells in Chara fibrosa subjected to gamma radiation. H5, histogram showing percentage of affected cells in Chara globularis subjected to gamma radiation. H6, histogram showing percentage of affected cells in Chara setosa subjected to gamma radiation. H7, histogram showing percentage of affected cells in Chara zeylanica subjected to gamma radiation.
Chromosomal effects were recorded even with low loses of 100 rads in case of N. opaca and N. flagelliformis, while no chromosomal abnormalities were visible upto 200 rads in N. acuminata and upto 500 rads in C. fibrosa, C. globularis, C. setosa and C. zeylanica. The most frequently observed effects after irradiation with X-rays and gamma-rays at doses of 100 and 200 rads in N. opaca and N. flagelli formis, 200 and 400 rads in N. acuminata, and 500 to 1000 rads in all the four species of Chara (C. fibrosa, C. globularis, C. setosa and C. zeylanica) were stickiness and clumping of chromosomes at metaphase as well as anaphase (Fig. 1). The number of chromosome fragments per cell also varied from species to species at different doses of X-rays and gamma-rays. For instance, in N. opaca and N. Figs.
1-13.
rads)
in
1500. cell
Effects
each 1,
case N.
showing
showing
at
shows
a
sticky
chromosome
lated
of nuclei
(2000-G). chromosome
(300-X). of
and
into chromosome
C.
12, zeylanica
breakage, left
middle showing
cell
N.
flagelliformis
minute chromosome
C. fibrosa three cell unequal
11,
anaphase cells
at
shows separation
of
C.
anaphase,
C.
cell
daughter
the
right
chromosome
cell
chromosomes
of
early
(2000-G).
each
showing
up
grouping of
different
showing
chromosome
fragments
N.
other
stages
showing
filament
at
7,
strands,
anaphase
antheridial
on of
breakage
(300-X).
made
formed
of lower
opaca-Anaphase
globularis
opaca •~
fragmentation
continuous
N.
N.
Figs.
metaphase
chromosome
presumably
bridge
2,
breakage,
showing 9,
10,
fibrosa
formed of
long
All
opaca
breakage
cells
sizes,
heavy
showing
two
two
N.
(in
G).
chromosome
(500-G).
showing
bridge
opaca
cell
formed
different
(2000-X).
3,
chromosome
(200-X). of
N.
administered by
(500-G),
showing
upper
fragments
doses
gamma-rays
(200-X). 4,
and
The
and
chromosomes
cells
showing
upper
(micronuclei)
fragments
(2000-G). 13,
dicentric
clumps
groups
8,
entirely
X
(300-X). two
metaphase
formation,
bridge
breakage
opaca
bridge
composed
chromosomes
N.
anaphase
C. fibrosa
chromosome
6,
showing
groups
numbers
oriented
of
at
formation 5,
taxa. by
clumping
laggards
ring
(500-X).
charophyte
denoted
and
and
and
metaphase
on
(X-rays
stickiness
breakage
(1000-X).
probably
gamma-rays
brackets
showing
transversely
cells
and in
breakage
at
metaphase
daughter
of
opaca
chromosome
opaca-two cell
X-rays
chromosome
chromosomes cell
of
is indicated
granu fragments
anaphase and
showing cell
on
the
1977
Irradiation
Studies on the Karyology of Charpphyta I
283
284
Y. S. R. K. Sarma and S. B. Singh
Cytologia
42
flagelliformis at 100 and 200 rads of X-rays, generally two to three fragments were observed and two to three occasionally four fragments with gamma-rays, the number of fragments becoming numerous at higher levels of irradiation (Figs. 3, 4 and 6). With N. acuminata, at low doses of 200 and 400 rads, chromosome fragments were very rare but as the dose level increased the number of fragments also increased progressively. The two species of Chara viz., C. fibrosa and C. globularis irradiated with X rays and gamma-rays show more or less similar types of chromosomal aberrations. The number of chromosome fragments per cell at a dose of 1000 rads were more than two (Fig. 5) in both the taxa but at higher dose of 2000 rads the number of chromosome fragments increased to more than five. Similarly, in C. setosa and C. zeylanica irradiated with gamma-rays none to one chromosome fragments were recorded at doses of 500 and 1000 rads whereas at higher doses of 1000 and 2000 rads more than two fragments were recorded. It may, therefore, be concluded that the quantitative estimates revealed that there is a linear increase in the frequency of breakage of chromosomes with increase in dose in all the taxa irradiated with X-ravs and gamma-ravs. Anaphase bridges were also observed very frequently in all the taxa of Nitella and Chara whether irradiated with X-rays or gamma-rays. In shape, size and con figuration, anaphase bridges presented a considerable variation at different doses. At low doses of 100 and 200 rads in N. opaca and N. flagelliformis, 200 to 400 rads in N. acuminata and 500 rads to 1000 rads in species of Chara, sticky bridges were more common and rarely dicentric bridges were also recorded in N. opaca (Fig. 9). But slightly higher doses of 300 and 400 rads in N. opaca and N. flagelliformis most of the bridges were formed of two to four long continuous strands with or without fragments (Fig. 7) whereas at higher dose of 500 rads chromosome bridges were made up of mostly fragments (Fig. 8). Similarly at higher doses of 800 and 1000 rads in N. acuminata and 1500 to 2000 rads in Chara the bridges were constituted of long continuous strands and/or with chromosome fragments only (Fig. 12 and 13). Ring chromosomes were also recorded though infrequent, in N. opaca and Nsflagelliformis at doses of 300 and 400 rads of X-rays and gamma-rays at metaphase as well as at anaphase (Fig. 3). Apart from the above abnormalities, laggards (Fig. 2), unusual grouping of chromosomes at metaphase and anaphase (Fig. 10), unequal separation of daughter chromosomes to the two poles (Fig. 13) and oc casional formation of micronuclei (Fig. 10) were also noticed in all the taxa. How ever, persistence of post treatment effects of higher doses in N. opaca, N. flagelli formis (500 rads) N. accuminata (1000 rads) and in C. fibrosa, C. globularis, C. setosa and C. zeylanica (2000 rads) were in evidence even after 84hr which were reflected by the interphase nuclei showing granulation (Fig. 11) and vacuolization. At high dose levels, dividing cells were comparatively few and most of the nuclei were degenerating.
Discussion
The effects of X-rays on algae have been studied by several workers (cf. God
Table
3.
Table effective
percentage
of affected
of irradiation
number, materials
radiation
taxa
and percentage
at
used
of affected
and gamma-rays
in various
length
employed
taxa
with X-rays charophyte
chromosome
used in various
of gamma
as experimental
doses
chromosome
effective
between
dose
cells as a result
dose and at highest
cells at lowest and highest
relationship
lowest
Showing
Showing
2.
286
Y. S. R. K. Sarma and S. B. Singh
Cytologia
42
ward 1962) who have suggested that in general algae are more resistant in comparison to higher plants. On the other hand, Sarma and Khan (1967) in Nitella flagelli formis, Howard and Horsley (1960) in Oedogonium cardiacum, reported that the organisms showed more or less same sensitivity as in higher plants. Dodge and Godward (1963) .reported that Prorocentrum micans, a member of Dinophyceae, was more resistant as compared to the cells of higher plants but less resistant in comparison to other algae. The present findings on N. opaca, N. flagelliformis and N. acuminata also agree with those of Sarma and Khan (1967) who studied earlier the effects of X-rays on N. flagelliformis and pointed out that this alga is more sensitive to X-rays in comparison to other algae investigated by other workers (cf. Godward 1962). It may be mentioned here that the species of N. opaca and Ns flagelliformis show similar radiosensitivity levels as reported by Sarma and Khan (1967). Likewise, the general effects observed in Cafibrosa and C. globularis agree with those of Chatter jee (1972) in C. braunii irradiated at doses ranging from 500 to 2000 rads. The results obtained with N. opaca, N. flagelliformis and N. acuminata are also comparable to the reports of Sax (1938, 1940) in Tradescantia pollen tube chromosomes, who reported 4.7% of total chromosomal abnormalities at a dose of 200 rads, whereas Ostergren, Morris and Wakonig (1958) reported 100% of abnormal cells at a low dose of 300 rads in Hyacinthus orientalis but in H. dalmaticus only 24.7% of abnormal cells were observed at the same dose level. Similar observation was made by Swanson (1940) who also reported 5.58% of chromosomal abnormali ties at a low dose of 240 rads in pollen tube chromosomes of Tradescantia. Thus observations made on the three taxa of Nitella particularly N. opaca and N. flagelli formis are comparable with the cases of flowering plants cited above with reference to their level of sensitivity, where the percentages of affected cells ranged approxi mately between 17% to 96% depending upon dose level (100-500 rads). On the other hand, results obtained on C. fibrosa and C. globularis agree with those of Sharma and Chatterji (1962) in five species of higher plants viz., Vicia faba, V. sativa, Haemanthus multiflorus, Aloe perfoliata and Cipura palmdosa who re ported chromosomal and other abnormalities at doses of 500 and 1000 rads. The earlier work on algae with gamma-rays is practically insignificant. The limited work on Eudorina elegans by Rayns and Godward (unpub.), Chlorella pyrenoidosa by Galley and Tolbert (1958), and on Euglena gracilis by Leedale (1958) showed that these organisms are very resistant to gamma-rays. No details con cerning the chromosomal abnormalities in those studies have been given. From the data presented in Table 2 it is quite obvious that the percentages of affected cells agree in treatments of X-rays and gamma-rays at same dose level of radiation on the given taxon. However, slight differences of 1.00 to 4.00% exist in the frequency of affected cells (cf. Table 2) between the two types of radiation. The results obtained for N. opaca, N. flagelliformis and N. acuminata agree with the reports of Kollar (1953), and Swanson (1955) in Tradescantia species with reference to the microspores following gamma-irradiation. Chromosomal and chromatid breakage and other abnormalities were achieved at very low doses of 50 to 200 rads (Swanson 1955). Acentric fragments and dicentric bridges were
1977
Irradiation
Studies on the Karyology of Charophyta
I
287
observed by Mikaeisen (1967) in barley root meristem at doses of 200 to 400 rads. On the other hand, the results obtained in the present work for C. fibrosa, C. globularis, C. setosa and C. zeylanica are comparable to the reports of Amer and Mikael (1972) on Vicia faba root tip. They reported chromosome and chromatid breakage at different doses ranging from 500 to 10,000 rads and concluded that chromosomal abnormalities rapidly increased with the increase in the dose of gamma radiation. Similar observations were made by Kalloo (1972) with dry seeds of Pisum at high dose of 10, 20 and 40K rads and Shaikh and Godward (1972) in Lathyrus sativus, Vicia sativus and Vicia ervilia at doses of above 5K rads of 60Co gamma-rays. Marshak (1937) in his study with heterogenous materials viz., Lycopersicum esculantum, Mus musculus, Pisum sativum, Allium cepa and Vicia faba, suggested that the frequency of X-ray induced chromosomal abnormalities per cell increased with increase in chromosome size. Recent studies on growth inhibition and sterility also support direct correlation between the sensitivity of radiations and the size of the chromosomes (Sparrow and Christensen 1953). The data recorded on algal species in the present study also establishes a correlation between the size of chromo somes and the level of radiosensitivity. For example, Nsflagelliformis having on an average the largest chromosome size showed the maximum radiosensitivity as com pared to the other allied taxa which have comparatively smaller size of chromo somes (cf. Table 3). This may be explained on the basis that larger the chromosome, more is the energy absorption which in turn may have induced greater number of chromosomal aberrations. Data on the influence of chromosome number on the radiosensitivity of the plants are not too plentiful. However, Sparrow and his colleagues (Sparrow 1967) suggested that the species with lower chromosome numbers are more sensitive than the species with higher chromosome number. Sparrow further suggested that the reason for the chromosome number influencing the radiation response may not be related to difference in the amount of genetic information lost per damaging event, but rather to the fact that chromosome size tends to decrease as chromosome number increases. The present study also supports the conclusions of Sparrow (1965). It may be seen that N. opaca and N. flagelliformis having n=6 and n=9 chromosomes respectively are most radiosensitive, while C. zeylanica with n=42 is the most resistant of all (cf. Table 3). These correlations between the size as well as number of chromosomes and the radioresponse can be examined on the basis of deletions. A single deletion in a nucleus with few chromosome number is expected to cause a considerably greater genetic loss on an average than a single deletion in a nucleus having its information dispersed over a large number of chromosomes. For instance, N. opaca having the least chromosome number (Table 3) seems to be more radiosensitive as compared to all other allied species except N. flagelliformis (n=9) which has a higher chromosome number.
However, the slightly higher level of radiosensitivity in N. flagelliformishaving 9 chromosomes in comparison to N. opaca with only 6 chromosomes may be ac counted on the established fact that larger the size of chromosomes greater will be
288
Y. S. R. K. Sarma and S. B. Singh
the
radioresponse.
(4.24ƒÊ)
is
expected
chromosome length of
flagelliformis absorb
aberrations of
3.8ƒÊ
more
N. to
4.18ƒÊ among
as
(Table the
radiosensitive
species
to
Similarly, of
to
opaca
having
in
the
on
an
damage
an
with
(Table
size
greater
globularis
included others
chromosome causing
N.
C.
Chara
compared
larger
energy
compared
3).
as
with greater
Cytologia
average
largest
present
in
average terms
of
chromosome
chromosome
study
42
size
appeared
to
be
3).
On the basis of their levels of radiosensitivity, it may be concluded that a) the taxa belonging to Nitella are more radiosensitive as compared to those of Chara b) that amongst the taxa of Nitella studied here, N. ftagelliformis and N. opaca are more radiosensitive as compared to N. acuminata and c) amongst the taxa of Chara, C. globularis and Cafibrosa are more sensitive to radiations as compared to C. setosa and C. zeylanica. When all the taxa used here as test materials of both Nitella and Chara are taken together, N. opaca and Ns flagelliformis with low chromo some numbers and long chromosomes are the least radioresistant and C. zeylanica with the highest chromosome numbers and with shorter chromosomes, is the most resistant to radiations. Further amongst algae, members of Charophyceae seemed to be less resistant in comparison to others studied so far and approach more closely the flowering plants in this respect. Thus, on the basis of the present study, a dis tinctive status for charophytes under a separate division Charophyta also seems to be justified. Summary
The present study deals with the effects of X-rays, gamma-rays on the karyology of some selected taxa of charophyta, antheridia having being exposed to radiations. Species of Nitella viz., N. opaca (n=6), N. flagelliformis (n=9) and N. acuminata (n=18) and four of Chara viz., C. fzbrosa (n=14), C. globularis var. virgata
(n=14),C.setosa(n=28)andC.zeylanica var.diaphora f. oerstidiana (n=42)were employed
as experimental
materials
in various
irradiation
experiments.
X-ray
and
gamma-ray doses ranged from 100 to 2000 rads. The materials in each case, after exposure to required amount of radiation, were transferred to fresh culture medium and were examined cytologically controls were maintained. The radiations somes some
qualitative to a greater
at metaphase and chromatid
changes
that
at varying were
or lesser extent
periods
observed were:
gards, unequal grouping of chromosomes, and rarely, formation of micronuclei.
in all the
stickiness
and anaphase, chromosome breaks at metaphase and
of time. taxa
In with
separation,
ring
experiments both
and of clumping
erosion, chromatid anaphase, anaphase
unequal
all
types
of
of chromo
gaps, chromo bridges, lag chromosomes
The quantitative estimates of affected cells, based on percentages of those show ing chromosome breakage at metaphase and anaphase and cells showing anaphase bridges, showed that levels of radiosensitivityof different taxa differed. The chromo somes of N. opaca having the lowest chromosome number (n=6) and of N. flagelli formis (n=9) with longest chromosomes seem to be more sensitive in comparison to other taxa, while C. zeylanica, with highest chromosome number in the series
1977
Irradiation
Studies on the Karyology of Charophyta
I
289
(n=42) as also with shortest chromosomes, was found to be more radioresistant of all the taxa investigated. However, charophyte taxa in the present study were shown to be more sensitive to radiations as compared with many other algal taxa belonging to other groups investigated earlier. The irradiation studies lend further support to the now more widely held view that Charophyta constitute a very dis tinctive group amongst algae. The generally held view that algae in general are more resistant to radiations in comparison to higher plants does not seem to apply to the members of Charophyta. On the basis of the present study it has been shown that the chromosomes of N. opaca and N. flagelliformis are as sensitive as to radi ations as those of higher plants. The results obtained in the study were adequately discussed. Acknowledgements
the
The authors
wish to express
Department
of
Sciences
and
to Dr.
their
gratitude
Radiotherapy
and
T. Sharma,
Department
to Professor
Radiation
Medicine,
of Zoology
G. C. Pant,
Head
Institute
Medical
for their
of
generous
help
of in
providing facilities of irradiation. Thanks are also due to the Head of the Depart ment of Botany for providing laboratory facilities. The financial assistance provided to the second
author
by the
authorities
of
Banaras
Hindu
University
is gratefully
acknowledged.
Literature
cited
Chatterjee, P. 1972. Ph. D. Thesis, Calcutta. Dodge, J. D. and Godward, M. B. E. 1963. Some effects of X-rays on the nucleus of a Dinoflagel late. Rad. Bot. 3: 99-104. Gailey, F. B, and Tolbert, N. E. 1958. Effect of ionizing radiation on the development of photo synthesis in etiolated wheat leaves. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 76: 188-195. Godward, M. B. E. 1948. The iron alum acetocarmine method for algae. Nature (London) 191: 203. 1954. - Irradiation of Spirogyra chromosomes. Heredity 8: 293 (Abs). 1962. Invisible radiation in "Physiology and Biochemistry of Algae" - ed. Lewin, R. A., Academic Press, New York, London. Guerlesquin, M. 1967. Recherches caryotypiques et. cytotaxonomiques chez les charophycees d'Europe Occidentale et d'Afrique du Nord. Ph. D. Thesis. Hotchkiss, A. T. 1963. A report of chromosome number in the genus Lychnothamus (Rupr). Leorh. and comparison with other charophyte genera. Proc. Linn. Soc. N. S. W. 138: 368-372. 1966. - A new revised base chromosome number for the genus Tolypella. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club. 93: 426-432. Howard, A. and Horsley, R. H. 1960. Filamentous green algae for radiobiological study. Int. J. Rad. Biology 2: 319-330. Jacobson, B. S. 1957. Evidence for recovery from X-rays damage in Chlamydomonas. Rad. Res. 7: 394-407. Kalloo. 1972. Chromosomal alterations in mitotic and meiotic system as influenced by gamma rays in Pisum. Cytologia 37: 643-651. Khan, M. and Sarma, Y. S. R. K. 1967. Some observations on the cytology of Indian Charophyta. Phykos 6: 62-74.
290
Y. S. R. K. Sarma and S. B. Singh
Cytologia
42
Koller, P. C. 1953. The cytological effects of irradiation at low intensities. Heredity 6: 5-22. Leedale, G. F. 1958. Nuclear structure and mitosis in Euglenieae. Arch. Mikrobiol. 32: 32-64. Marshak, A. 1937. The effect of X-rays on chromosome in mitosis. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sc. 23: 362-269. Mikaeisen, K. 1968. Comparison between chromosome aberrations induced by ionizing radiations and alkylating agents at different stages of mitosis in barley seeds. Mutations in Plant Breeding II STI/POB/182. Ostergreen, G., Morris, R. and Wakonig. 1958. A study in Hyacinthus on chromosome size and breakability by X-rays. Hereditas 44: 1-17. Patel, R. J. 1970. Effects of irradiation (High energy -rays) on Cladophorales I. Chaetomorpha metagonium. Nuclus 13 (2): 111-117. Prasad, B. N. and Godward, M. B. E. 1968. Cytology of irradiated Mougeotia sp. The Nucleus 11 (1): 43-49. Sarma, Y. S. R. K. and Khan, M. 1967. The effects of X-rays on the chromosomes of Nitella flagelliformis Br. The Nucleus 10(1): 90-93. and Singh, S. B. 1974. Effects of gamma-rays on the chromosomes of Nitella flagelliformis. Cytologia 39(2): 303-308. Sax, K. 1938. Chromosome aberrations induced by X-rays. Genetics 23: 494-516. 1940. An analysis of X-rays induced chromosomal aberrations in Tradescantia. Genetics 25: 41-68. Shaikh, M. A. Q. and Godward, M. B. E. 1972. The mitotic consequences of radiation induced chromosome breakage in Lathyrus and Vicia eravilia. Cytologia 37: 489-495. Sharma, A. K. and Chatterji, A. K. 1962. Chromosome size as a factor in radiosensitivity. The Nucleus 5(1): 67-74. Amer, Soheir, M. and Mikael, Evan 1972. Cytogenetic studies on the effects of 60Co gamma ir radiation on Vicia faba. Cytologia 37: 169-174. Sparrow, A. H. and Christensen, E. 1953. Tolerance of certain higher plants to chronic exposure to gamma radiation from 60Co. Science 118: 697-698. Comparison of the tolerance of higher plants - species to acute and chronic exposures of ionizing radiation. Jap. J. Genetics 40: 12-37. -, Underbrinck , A. G. and Sparrow, R. C. 1967. Chromosomes and cellular radiosensitivity I. The relationship of D0 to chromosome volume and complexity in seventynine organisms. Rad. Res. 32(4) : 915-945. Swanson, C. P. 1940. A comparison of chromosomal aberrations induced by X-rays and UV radiation. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sc. U. S. 26: 366-373. 1955. The oxygen effects and chromosome breakage. J. Cell Comp. Physiol. 45(2): 285-298. 1965.