LETTERS
TO
programs
THE
EDITOR
present
hospitalization
the patient
demarcating”)
with only two choices-continued
or commitment-before
discharge
will
be con-
trum
such
diverse
of the corpus
structures
callosum,
as the
pyriform
septal
cortex,
nuclei,
ros-
and “various
ol-
sidered. Under these circumstances, it is debatable how voluntary the patient’s hospitalization really is (I). The recommendations considered by our task force on AMAs include the following: I. Using the AMA category only when the patient is not
factory pathways” have “particular
under the rubric “septal region” is that they functional qualities.” Since the septal region
refers
tissue
committable,
animals,
i.e., dangerous
to himselfor
to others.
2. Not using the AMA designation for patients who drop out and leave without telling the staff and who cannot be traced or returned to the facility after repeated attempts. 3.
Using
have
been
not
making
the
term
only
informed
plications
of the
patient
and
cons
that
they
and/or
prevent
practicing
know
the
(i.e.,
the possible
com-
only when, in addition to considerations or countersigns the order. One hopes that
a nonphysician
without
question
of AMA
ership in this area by defining ignation before nonclinicians
or terms
nate,
the
to deal
situation
to define
with
in which
mary if not sole therapists, charge decisions are made
in man
the
midline with
changed
to include
gyrus
rectus, which
are
it, the art
more ventrally, the (or septal) nucleus
the boundaries do this for
the outpatient therapeutic
heterogeneous
ofthe We
club,
es-
reentry its
lead-
AMA desalso need a
clinicians
their non
for
to termiare
communities
the
pri-
where
dis-
etc.
in voluntary
mental
D, Haven,
hospi-
M.D. Conn.
how many helped by
in the time they spent working on this material. invasion of bureaucracy into medical practice destroy the physician-patient relationship and, of medicine.
I. HARRIS, Cambridge.
M.D. Mass.
of Anatomy
132:3,
March
1975
aspect
ofthe
In a
large
(2) and, include
the
rostral
sites
of the
of
head
of
Dr.
sheet
may very and
of tissue
and
separating
not contain
small and the diagonal
Heath
this
the
is lacking in man. is used to denote
or may
the possibility
demarcating
are the fiber
the
septum).
is a thin
which
preclude
rigidly
poorly band
associates
nerve defined (4). The
include
of an anatomical
in
crite-
area.
connections
between
the septal
region
and
other parts of the brain? Figure 1 in Dr. Heath and associates’ article diagrams them on a human brain. I know of no studies demonstrating such anatomical connections in man. Possibly,
the arrows experiments
on this diagram to the human
represent an extrapolation of animal case. However, there is no published
anatomical evidence of connection between the septal region and ventral lateral thalamus, between the fastigial nucleus of the cerebellum and the hippocampus, or between the interpeduncular nucleus and the septal region by way of the medial neetion
bundle.
The
only
is in a publication
evidence that
ever, the photographs authors were capable
Dr.
of Heath
a
fastigio-septal
con-
coauthored
(5).
in that article do not convince of distinguishing experimental
How-
me that the (degener-
ating) their
axons from normal axons not sufficiently suppressed by staining technique. Finally, figure 1 in their article in the Journal shows the amygdala existing in isolation. This structure thalamus
prepare this material. One wonders have been treated or administratively
which
and
structures
definitions
What
who wishes
nonphysician collectively,
us.
sensi-
special section “PSRO and Other Peer (December 1974 issue) gives one pause. specialists devoted the time and thought
Am J Psychiatry
part
cells and, parolfactory
SIR: One ofthe disturbing features of”Brain Activity During Emotional States” by Robert G. Heath, M.D., and associates (August 1974 issue) is its tenuous anatomical rationale. For example, the “previously defined” septal region the authors refer to occupies 2 pages in the 619-page book they cite as a reference (I ). In that book, the criterion for grouping (“rigidly
298
not
pellucidum,
HERBERT
A Question
also
ventricles
be reviewed.
not
accumbens, medial
the lateral
to
and
other
septal Brain
parts
of
region Activity
the
brain,
but
not
as Dr. Heath and During Emotional
to
rate
presentation
of the neuroanatomy
the
sensory
associates States”
I feel that responsible article from an anatomical point ofview. apparent that Dr. Heath and associates were not whether one of their central arguments incorporated “
with
nucleus ventral
the septum
and legal
does
Such an obvious and well-defined structure In its place, the broader term “septal region”
is connected
these specialists The increasing may eventually
the
medical
Bureaucracy?
to could
the
and
charged
must
ofanimals. denotes
subdivisions
nuclei,
are
is diffi-
I have listed that are part of Dr. Heath and associdefinition (in a later article [3J, Dr. Heath’s definition
being
New
necessary patients
septal
giving
discharges
that
nucleus”
identifiable
the
from
ANT0NI0J.
The impressive Mechanisms” highly trained
readily
of
region
structures
forebrain
SIR:
with
so unlike
it is
criteria
the septal
“septal
(i.e.,
1. Szasz TS: Involuntary hospitalization tals. N EngI J Med 287:277-278, 1972
Review Twenty
because term
exception
anatomical
In fact,
clinician
REFERENCE
An Unnecessary
function
term.
restricted
structure the
--not the
a license
The use of the AMA discharge may be a not-so-subtle pecially when it is coupled with barring the patient’s into the treatment process. The American Psychiatric Association can exercise
term
in defining
caudate,
medicine
entire
cult
ates’
family
situation
advice and signing discharge orders). In this day of rising consumer consciousness tivity,
the
of the
or consequences).
would
with
the
pros
the assumption
4. Using this term I -3, a physician signs this
when
to nervous
necessary
imply. is an ir-
It is sadly concerned an accu-
involved.
R F FE REN C F 5
1. Heath RG, and and Neurology: University Press, 2. Andy J. Stephan
Charles
C Thomas,
the Tulane University Department of Psychiatry Studies in Schizophrenia. Cambridge, Harvard 954 H: The Septum of the Cat. Springfield. Ill.
1964
3.
Paul SM, Heath RG, Ellison iT: direct pathway from the fastigial Neurol 40:798 805. 1973
4.
Crosby
EC. Humphrey
T, Laues
Histochemical demonstration nucleus to the septal region.
EW: Correlative
Anatomy
of a Exp
of the
Nervous System. New York. Macmillan Publishing Co. 1962 5. Harper JW, Heath RG: Anatomic connections of the fastigial cleus to the rostral forebrain in the cat. Exp Neurol 39:285 I973
BlAIR
H.
TURNER,
Pu.D.
Washington.
D.C.
nu-292,