1029 Health

decide whether

must

they

wish the activities of

medically qualified anatomists, as set out above, to continue by ensuring a reasonable financial return, possibly derived in part from University and partly from N.H.S., or whether the rearguard action of British anatomists to maintain a medical presence must finally end and the departments become staffed by non-medical individuals who quite reasonably put science first and second, and vocational training a poor third; a balanced staff provides a balanced course. Both Vice-Chancellors and the U.G.C. have been aware of the deteriorating situation for the past The seven years, but have chosen to remain inactive. crisis in staffing is now, and with the current exodus of career anatomists overseas and into general practice, the new schools, and even some long established schools, may fail to meet their teaching commitments during the next 12 months. Virtually all the older establishments will be past the point of no-return so far as medical staff is concerned within 5 years. Department of Human Morphology, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD.

lower or not in an Open University medical course. Possibly not, but we would have to try the experiment on a small scale to find out. What is likely, however, is that his estimate of 2 years’ preclinical and 22 years’ clinical period is too short. It is frightening to expect even mature students to learn " anatomy, physiology, biochemistry, pharmacology, behavioural sciences, general pathology and microbiology, medical statistics and epidemiology, and

genetics",

as

suggested by Professor Acheson,

R. E. COUPLAND.

138

MEDICAL COURSE AT THE OPEN UNIVERSITY

SiR,—Iam an admirer of the Open University and I am full of praise for its achievements in developing new techniques in education and in enabling 10,000 of our citizens to achieve its degrees since its start only a few years ago. However, I do not accept the case made by the Dean of the Medical Faculty at Southampton University, Prof. Donald Acheson, for an undergraduate medical course for the Open University (April 26, p. 965). The chief reason for developing the idea must be the need for more doctors in the United Kingdom. No sound case has been made for this in spite of the fact that the Governments, U.G.C., and our medical schools are planning to double the annual intake of medical schools to over 4000 (compared with 1970 intakes). Even allowing for a 2-3% annual increase I believe that we need approximately 2600 new medical students each year to meet our own requirements. I believe that we may be creating medical unemployment within 10-15 years if we go ahead with present projections.l There is therefore no good reason for accepting that we need a new Open University Medical School to take in 600 students annually in order to produce 300, as Professor Acheson suggests. Professor Acheson seeks to show that the Open University course would be cheaper than setting up a traditional medical school for 100 students. Surely it is wrong to make such comparisons. It would be crazy for us to build such a It would be much fairer if he had comof increasing the intake of existing medical schools by 100 each year with those of an Open University course. We must realise also that each new medical student who graduates will be responsible for a national capital expenditure of up to Elmillion in his or her professional lifetime.1 Another reason given by Professor Acheson is that it would make it easier for mature students to gain entry to a medical school. If there is a strong case for taking in more mature students into medicine, then why do not Professor Acheson and his fellow deans agree to allocate a higher proportion of places in their existing medical schools for this purpose and convince the Treasury and the Department of Education of the need to support such students with

school

pared the

part-time

University. Croydon Road. Beckenham,

JOHN FRY.

Kent BR3 4DG.

new

as

home students. In spite of my uncertainty of the need for an undergraduate medical course I am certain that there is much that the Open University can contribute to postgraduate medical education. There are great opportunities for Open University involvement and cooperation in specialist training and continuing education. The methods and techniques of teaching and learning that it has developed would add greatly to the current programmes. It is in the postgraduate medical field that I see the greatest scope for the Open

now.

costs

BIOLOGY, ABORTION,

AND ETHICS

SIR,-As one who, like Dr Potts (April 19, p. 913), is interested in the relationship between the natural law and resistance to disease, I believe that biological evidence favours the natural law. For example, there is evidence that oestriol plays a significant anticarcinogenic role in the human female, accounting for the reduced expectancy of mammary cancer in women with multiple pregnancies in their early childbearing years.l It has also been suggested that pregnancy at a young age is associated with the formation of favourable cestrogen ratios and decreased breast-cancer risk later.2 On the other hand, there is an association between changes in adrenocortical function and mental disturbances.3 It has been found that excretion of urinary ketosteroid levels and levels of circulating lymphocytes may be modified by emotional stress.44 It has been affirmed that emotional stress results in increased adrenocortical activity.5 There is also much evidence to suggest that depressed emotional states decrease resistance to tuberculosis, rheumatoid arthritis, and cancer, diseases to which immunity is cell-mediated. It is well known that plasmaoestrogen levels are increased in pregnancy. Should not the exponents of a liberal policy towards abortion be asked to quote objective evidence of urinary and plasma steroid assays in support of their contention that terminations are justified on account of psychological stress ? Plymouth Road, Buckfastleigh, Devon TQ110DH.

72

MICHAEL WILKINSON.

MEDICAL AUDIT

.

government

grants ?

It is difficult 1.

to

theorise whether standards would be

Fry, J. Update (in the press).

SIR,-It is apparent that a myth called Medical Audit is being promoted in Great Britain. Having wasted countless hours during the past twenty years on meetings of the so-called medical audit and tissue committee, I feel obliged to sound an alarm. The myth of medical audit was invented by the Council ,

1. 2. 3. 4.

5.

Lemon, H. M. Cancer, 1970, 25, 423. Cole, P., McMahon, B. Lancet, 1969, i, 604. Beck, J. C., McGarry, E. E. Br. med. Bull. 1962, 18, 134. Hill, S. R., Goetz, F. C., Fox, H. M., Murawski, B. J., Krakauer, L. J., Reifenstein, R. W., Gray, S. J., Reddy, W. J., Hadberg, S. E., St. Marc, J. R., Thorn, G. W. Archs intern. Med. 1956, 97, Greenwood, F. C., Landon, J. Nature, 1966, 210, 540.

no.

3.

Letter: Biology, abortion, and ethics.

1029 Health decide whether must they wish the activities of medically qualified anatomists, as set out above, to continue by ensuring a reasonabl...
161KB Sizes 0 Downloads 0 Views