Robert C. Smith, R. Todd Constable,
MD #{149}Caroline Reinhold, MD2 #{149}Thomas R. McCauley, MD PhD #{149} Ruben Kier, MD #{149}Shirley McCarthy, PhD, MD
Multicoil High-Resolution MR Imaging ofthe Female A fast spin-echo pulse sequence was combined with multiple surface coils used simultaneously in the form of a “multicoil” in magnetic resonance imaging studies of the female pelvis. This combination allowed maximal resolution with maintenance of the signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) at an acceptable level, and the S/N with the multicoil system was substantially better than that achieved with a body coil. Excellent image quality and demonstration of anatomic detail were afforded by use of this technique. Index
terms: Magnetic resonance (MR), coil #{149} Magnetic resonance (MR), high-reso#{149} Magnetic resonance (MR), multicoil #{149} Magnetic resonance (MR), rapid #{149} Pelvic organs, MR. 85.1214
arrays lution imaging imaging Radiology
1992;
184:671-675
M
resonance
of the
imag-
pelvis
with pulse
conventional sequences
and
that
with a body coil, fast spin-echo provides T2-weighted
of quality
superior
a
to that
achieved with a standard-resolution CSE sequence. The inplane resolution of both of these sequences was 1.1 mm (frequency) by 2.2 mm (phase). The the
FSE technique, however, possibility of performing
allows much
higher-resolution imaging because of the marked reduction in imaging time. In an ideal MR imaging sequence, resolution is maximized while the signab-to-noise ratio (S/N) is maintained near a certain threshold level. An increase
in S/N
beyond
this
level
in little perceptible image quality but
improvement usually increases
imaging
of S/N
time.
Use
results
below
in this
level results in perceptible image degradation (2). When the FSE sequence is cornbined with multiple surface coils used simultaneously in the form of a “multicoil” (3-5), the S/N is improved so that high-resolution images can be obtained in less than 5 minutes. When nonstationary
structures
are
being
imaged, however, an increase in resobution does not necessarily improve image quality. The increased imaging time may From the Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St. New Haven, CT 06510. From the 1991 RSNA scientific assembly. Received February 18, 1992; revision requested May 1; revision received May 18; accepted May 20. Address re1
print
requests
with higher-resolution result in a substantial
physiologic piratory
PhD
phase encoding. In addition, smaller voxel size increases phase ghost artifact (6). Despite improved S/N, use of multicoil imaging itself can result in image degradation due to increased in-
is cur-
(body) coil. A prior issue of Radiology (1)
demonstrated standard-resolution (FSE) sequence images
(MR)
female
rently performed spin-echo (CSE) a whole-volume study in this
C. Lange,
Fast Spin-Echo Pelvis’
AGNETIC
ing
Robert
#{149}
motion motion,
sequences increase
artifacts bowel
from
in
res-
peristalsis,
and vascular pulsation. It is important to note that the FSE technique is not compatible with respiratory-ordered
tensity occurs
of phase as a result
ghost artifact. of both the
This in-
creased signal from subcutaneous fat immediately adjacent to the surface coils and the image reconstruction algorithm employed (3,4). A prior study compared CSE images obtained with a body coil to CSE images obtamed with a mubticoil system (7). Multicoil images obtained with a small field of view (FOV) showed increased motion artifact in comparison with body-coil images obtained with a standard FOV. The purpose of this study was to determine if the increase in imaging time, decrease in voxel size, and multicoil-related artifacts in high-resolution FSE multicoib imaging would result in significant image degradation. We therefore performed MR imaging in a series of patients, by using a standard-resolution body-coil FSE sequence and a high-resolution multicoil FSE sequence that required a longer imaging time. The body-coil FSE
images
were
obtained
by using
parameters that provide images superior to those obtained with body-coil CSE sequences (1). These images served as a baseline for determination of multicoil image quality. Direct comparison of high-resolution body-coil imaging with high-resolution multicoil imaging with identical
imaging
parameters
was
not
undertaken. A preliminary evaluation indicated that body-coil images obtamed with parameters identical to those used to obtain multicoil images
to R.C.S.
Current address: Department of Radiology, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal. © RSNA, 1992 See also the article by Smith et al (pp 665-669) in this issue. 2
Abbreviations: FSE
=
fast
CSE spin-echo,
=
S/N
conventional spin-echo, E-space = signal-to-noise ratio.
=
echo
spacing,
FOV
=
field
of view,
671
b.
a. Figure clearly
1. T2-weighted (4,500/126) high-resolution shows four distinct zones of signal intensity
nal. A surrounding palmatae (arrow).
Figure
2.
intermediate (c) Axial image
(a) Body-coil
c. multicoil MR images obtained in a 29-year-old within the cervix. An inner zone of increased
zone most likely represents mucosa through the corpus demonstrates
T2-weighted
(arrow). a septate
(b) An axial image uterus (arrow).
woman. (a) Sagittal signal intensity most demonstrates
the
image likely
individual
of the uterus represents the cafolds
of the
plicae
(2,900/
126) sagittal decreased endometrium
MR image shows a linear area of signal intensity within the fundal (arrow). (b) Multicoil highsagittal image (4,500/126) obtained patient shows far greater detail and the diagnosis of blood clot (arrow).
resolution in same suggests
The
finding
ages
obtained
was seen
tent
with
to be resolved
3 weeks
later,
the diagnosis
in this
study
quality,
not
proval
of diagnostic
of the
MATERIALS This
lowered
AND
study
was
of the
Yale
is consis-
of clot.
were
because
on im-
which
S/N.
METHODS
performed
with
University
the
ap-
Human
In-
a.
vestigation Committee. The patient population consisted of 32 consecutive women referred for pelvic MR imaging over an
8-week from
period.
The women
17 to 76 years
formed
consent
ranged
(mean,
was
obtained
from
tients during our routine preimaging terview. All imaging was performed a l.5-T system (Signa; GE Medical
tems, Milwaukee). Prior to imaging, patients bladder. Patients underwent the prone or supine position, on
their
preference.
After
weighted
bocalizer
msec/echo
time
tamed,
sagittal
images
were
with
the
28-cm
and
axial
2.5-mm
intersection
matrix, length
time
These
provide
parameters
53 seconds.
To
anatomy,
was
used
672
#{149}
ensure
Radiology
MR imaging
coverage 18 sections
localizer
pelvis,
either
of the
of
in
a prototype
Medical
pelvic
or sagittal
was
initially
RESULTS
T2-weighted Because imag-
high-resoluwere obtained
plane 4,500/126,
FOV anterior and posterior pulses (8) were used. The saturation the sagittal
sec-
ters
provide
with
Overall reduction
in
the
20-cm
saturation position of these
pulses was determined localizer image. These
10 sections
Imwas
Systems).
with a unit in time available depending on the
needed, images
On the basis of the body-coil center 10 section locations
were chosen for the multicoil images. aging in the axial and sagittab planes performed in eight of the 32 patients.
under-
nab averages, echo-train length of 16, and E-space of 17.5 msec. Superior and inferior saturation pulses, no-phase wrap, and in-
rele-
acquisition in 106
and
imaging
parameters:
49 seconds. images, the
FOV, 4-mm section thickness, 2-mm intersection spacing, 512 x 256 matrix, four sig-
x 128
sections
the axial
following
inferior saturation wrap were used.
nine
FSE
(GE
TI-
all patients
bladder
with
system
FSE 2,900/126,
a concatenated
to provide
went
imaging, their
clinical information tion FSE multicoil
two signal averages, echo-train of 16, and echo spacing (E-space) and
emptied
axial
obtained.
ing was being performed clinical use, total imaging was limited. Therefore,
thickness, 256
were
performed. High-resolution images were then obtained.
ob-
the
spacing,
18 msec. Superior pulses and no-phase
vant
was
conventional
body-coil
again multicoil
Ti-
body-coil
section
After
inwith Sys-
(repetition
parameters:
5-mm
all pa-
this, images
Sagittal
through
following
FOV,
After
weighted
emptied their imaging in depending
image
obtained
onds.
In-
a coronal
500/20 msec)
in age
34 years).
b.
in 4 minutes
from parame-
and
with
the
omy
of
quality were
and motion consistently
mubticoil
images.
the
uterine
artifact excellent
Zonal
corpus
and
anatcervix
were visualized in such greater detail on the multicoil images that a cervical zone not described previously with CSE
pulse
60%
(12
sequences of
20)
was
noted
of the patients
in
imaged
the sagittal plane (Figs 1, 2). Ovarstructure was depicted in far better detail (ie, individual follicles and cortical and medullary stroma) than previously shown with body-coil imin
ian
ages
(Figs
cysts
were
3, 4).
Similarly,
seen
in far
nabothian greater
detail
September
1992
k-space data, which are Fourier-transformed to separate images. These images are then combined into a single composite image by using a sum of squares
combination
reconstruction
algorithm (3,5). With this technique, the signal intensity of each pixel in the composite image is equal to the square
b. Figure 3. (a) Body-coil T2-weighted (4,500/126) multicoil image obtained cystic ovarian disease. Notice that ated on the multicoil image.
(2,900/126) axial MR image and (b) high-resolution in a 19-year-old woman with a clinical diagnosis the individual cysts and ovarian stroma are clearly
of polyappreci-
b. Figure 4. Definitive hon image
on the
(a) Body-coil T2-weighted (2,900/126) image identification of the right ovary is not possible. obtained in the same patient clearly delineates
multicoil
individual venous (Fig 6).
images
(Fig 5). The
veins of the perivaginal plexus could be identified
obtained in an 18-year-old (b) Multicoil (4,500/126) the right ovary (arrow).
in a receive-only
An example body-coil
DISCUSSION In regions close to the coil, S/N with local (or surface) coils is markedly better than that provided by body coils. The local coils are used only in the receive mode, and the transmit excitation pulse is provided by the body coil. The sensitive region of a local coil is severely limited, typically on the order of the coil diameter. When used individually, these coils can
provide
When
multiple
simultaneously
“multicoil,” Volume
184
only
small-FOV
surface in the
coils form
images.
are used of a
however,
large-FOV
#{149} Number
3
im-
woman. high-resolu-
ages with improved S/N can be obtamed, as previously described (3-5). This requires that each coil act independently
mode.
of high-resolution
and
mubticoil
images
ob-
tamed in the same patient and with identical imaging parameters is shown in Figure 7. This demonstrates the substantial that is afforded
The
improvement in S/N by the mubticoil.
mubticoil
used
consisted
of two
coils
two
(Fig
and
8). The
adjacent adjacent
lapped such tance is zero generated by during signal erate a current Each individual
in this
adjacent
posterior are
through
of the
sum
of the
squares
the
creased
coils
that their mutual induc(ie, the magnetic field the current in one coil reception does not genin the adjacent coil). coil generates its own
image
(3,5).
voxel
size
in high-resolution
multicoil FSE imaging. In fact, even though glucagon was not administered and the imaging time of the high-resolution sequence is close to 5 minutes, even large bowel anatomic detail is consistently sharp in the multicoil images. In addition, the in-FOV saturation pulses were extremely effective in suppressing the signal from subcutaneous fat and in preventing ghost artifact. Correct placement of these pulses, especially anteriorly, is essential. The position of these pulses is determined
bocalizer
from multicoil
the uterus show detail. A distinct has
not
been
study.
images
spin-echo during
axial)
This
canal)
through
zone
previously
most
on
MR images, the course of of intermediate
signal intensity (immediately to the inner high-intensity cervical
(or
the zonab anatomy in cervical zone, which
described
conventional was identified this
a sagittal
image.
Sagittal
over-
entire
In addition to those artifacts related to the multicoil and the image reconstruction algorithm, the decreased voxel size (6) and increased imaging time with a higher-resolution sequence will also have a tendency to degrade image quality. The purpose of this study was to determine if these factors resulted in significant degradation of high-resolution FSE multicoil images. The inplane resolution of the multicoil images is 0.4 mm (frequency) x 0.8 mm (phase). This represents a decrease of close to a factor of 3 in voxel size in both the phase and frequency directions, compared with standard-resolution images. On the basis of the results of this study, it appears that there is not a perceptible increase in motion artifact from increased imaging time or de-
study
anterior
coils
root
of corresponding pixel values in the individual-coil images. This method does not use weighting factors to compensate for the increased signal intensity from voxels close to a coil. This reconstruction method has two important consequences: (a) objects located close to the coil have markedly increased signal intensity and (b) phase ghost artifacts are poorly suppressed, being propagated
likely
adjacent zone of the represents
Radiology
673
#{149}
Figure
a.
b.
Figure
5.
shows
ill-defined
nabothian
(a) Body-coil cysts
tient allows
T2-weighted
increased (arrow).
definitive
signal (b) Multicoil
identification
(2,900/126)
intensity
High-resolution T2-weighted multicoil image demonstrates vessels of the penvaginal-periure-
individual
image
within
6.
(4,500/126) obtained
the external
high-resolution
(4,500/126)
of the individual
in a 35-year-old
woman
Os, which may represent image obtained in same
thral
venous
Figure
8.
plexus.
pa-
cysts.
A multicoil
phantom.
nor
Notice
coils
are
torn by straps
a.
is placed
that
held
around
the anterior
in opposition
with
fabric
and to the
a
postephan-
fasteners.
b.
Figure 7. FSE images obtained at 4,500/126, 20-cm FOV, 4-mm section spacing, 512 x 256 matrix, no-phase wrap, and in-FOV tion pulses. The only difference between the imaging techniques the image in a was obtained with a body coil and that in b was patient has a septate uterus.
section
anterior used obtained
thickness,
and
posterior
2-mm
inter-
satura-
to obtain these is that with a multicoil. This
patients.
the mucosa. Its corrugated inner margin, the plicae palmatae (9), was apparent. The high-resolution images enabled visualization of individual vessels of the perivaginal-periurethral venous plexus. Availability of this much detail would obviate possible confusion with high-signalintensity lesions such as urethral diverticuba (10). Sometimes, because of the limited resolution of images obtained with a 256 x 128 matrix, ovarian stroma or individual cysts cannot be discretely seen, making definitive identification of the ovaries impossible. Of 34 ovaries identified on axial images, nine were evident only on high-resolution images (P < .005). This study was not intended as a comparison of high-resolution multiRadiology
#{149}
coil imaging and imaging performed with an optimized body-coil FSE sequence. The body-coil FSE images were obtained to have a reference by which to evaluate the multicoil images. Therefore, on the basis of results of this study, we cannot conclude that high-resolution multicoil imaging is superior to body-coil FSE imaging. It is clear, however, that the high-resolution parameters used with multicoil imaging in this study cannot be employed in a body coil without image degradation occurring because of the lower S/N (Fig 7). It has been shown that improvement in S/N beyond a certain threshold will result only in a small improvement in image quality (2).
S/N
in the
high-resolution
coil images obtained near this threshold
multi-
in this study in average-sized
was
Therefore,
in obese
patients,
an increase in FOV or decrease in matrix size may be required to maintain S/N
674
the
at an
acceptable
level.
Multicoib imaging formed with standard tems
unless
cannot be perimaging sys-
additional
hardware
is
obtained. Each coil of the multicoil array requires a separate preamplifier, amplifier, receiver, and memory. Thus, multicoil imaging capability is costly.
In addition,
since
performance
of this study, we have noted significant image degradation when one or more coils of the multicoil array is not functioning properly. It is therefore important to check the function of the individual coils on a regular basis. This is accomplished by obtaining images of a phantom and comparing the received signal intensities of the mdividuab coils. The individual-coil signal intensities
are
accessible
during
per-
formance of the preimagrng process. This study indicates that multicoil imaging can provide improved visualSeptember
1992
ization of anatomic structures in pebvic MR imaging. This should result in improved ability for detection of abnormalities as well as determination of their extent. The application of multicoil imaging to specific disease entities as well as tumor staging needs to be formally investigated to determine if the benefits outweigh the additional cost. U
2.
3.
4.
Smith RC, Reinhold C, Lange RC, et al. Fast spin-echo MR imaging of the female
I. Use of a whole-volume
with MR phased
arrays.
son Med 1991; 18:309-319. Hayes CE, Roemer PB. Noise in data simultaneously acquired
tiple surface
6.
coil. Radi-
ology 1992; 184:665-669. Owens RS, Wehrli FW. Predictability of SNR and reader preference in clinical MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 1990; 8:737745. Hayes CE, Hattes N, Roemer PB. Volume
imaging
5.
References 1.
pelvis.
coil arrays.
Magn
Magn
Med
1990; 16:181-191. Roemer PB, Edelstein WA, Hayes CE, Souza SP, Mueller OM. The NMR phased
array.
Magn
Reson
Wood
ML,
Henkelman
netic field dependence artifact. Magn Reson
8.
McCauley TR, McCarthy S. Lange RC. Pelvic phased array coil: image quality assessment for spin echo MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 1992 (in press). Edelman RR, Atkinson DJ, Silver MS. Loaiza
FL, Warren
WS.
FRODO
pulse
sequences: a new means of eliminating motion, flow, and wraparound artifacts.
Re-
correlations from mul-
Reson
7.
9. 10.
Radiology 1988; 166:231-236. Bloom W, Fawcett DW. A textbook of histology. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1975; 894. Hricak H, Secaf E, Buckley DW, Brown JJ,
Tanagho EA, McAnich JW. thra: MR imaging. Radiology
Female 1991;
ure178:
527-535.
Med 1990; 16:192-225. RM.
The
mag-
of the breathing Imaging 1986; 4:387-
392.
Volume
184
Number
#{149}
3
Radiology
675
#{149}