www.nature.com/scientificreports

OPEN

received: 07 July 2015 accepted: 02 March 2016 Published: 13 May 2016

Network Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Postmenopausal, HR–Positive Breast Cancer Wei Wang*, Chenghao Liu*, Wenbin Zhou, Tiansong Xia, Hui Xie & Shui Wang In clinical practice, it is necessary to define an optimal choice from many different therapeutic regimens. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) for breast cancer patients. Randomized clinical trials were included. Nine studies comprising 2133 patients were included in the final analysis. Network meta-analysis showed that everolimus plus letrozole was more easily accepted by patients than exemestane (≥20wks) (odds ratio (OR): 856697.02, 95% confidence intervals (95%CI): 1.88 to 87242934...); exemestane (≥20wks) had worse acceptability than letrozole (OR: 0.00, 95%CI: 0.00 to 0.98). Letrozole produced a better clinical objective response (COR) than tamoxifen (OR: 1.99, 95%CI: 1.04 to 3.80). The incidence of fatigue between the anastrozole plus gefitinib group and the everolimus plus letrozole group was significantly different (OR: 0.08, 95%CI: 0.01 to 0.83). The exemestane (

Network Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Postmenopausal, HR-Positive Breast Cancer.

In clinical practice, it is necessary to define an optimal choice from many different therapeutic regimens. This study aimed to assess the efficacy an...
1MB Sizes 2 Downloads 7 Views