OUR RESPONSIBILITY FOR RETARDATION. By Cakkie R. Principal of Training Dept., That there is

Squire, Ph.D.,

State Normal

waste, terrific

School, Superior, Wis.

waste in

our

public

schools

through retardation has been proven beyond a doubt by the studies of Ayres. and Thorndike. Ayres estimates that the cost of the in 55 of our repeater largest cities is equal to 14 per cent of the cost

of maintenance for whole system.

community mental

ous

repeat.

Yet the financial loss to the with the loss in time, in vigor-

is small in

comparison development, and in will

The

of such

dumping community

is

failures upon the in dollars.

a a

to succeed in the children who

large percentage

of confessed

loss that cannot be estimated

responsible ? The valuable statistical studies of Thorndike and Ayres give us tlie broad general outline of the situation. They give us facts. But special studies, such as A. E. Wagner's Who is

"Retardation and Elimination in Schools of Mauch Chunk Townpersons who are familiar with the children, their home

ship,"1 by

and school

a

State

study.

will

causes

The school of

give so far as they go a truer answer underlying retardation. of which I am principal?the training department

environment,

the real

as to

Normal?presents

an

We know each other

excellent field for such

an

intimate

pretty thoroughly, children, parents

and teachers. There are those Our pupils represent three general classes. whose parents have sought the most hygienic school environment in the community from the beginning of the school life of their Then there are children who have failed in the public children.

schools. Their parents, weary of ineffectual prodding, have followed some neighbor's prescription and sent them to the Normal to be cured. Finally there is a small class of boys and girls who have shown tendencies that have interfered with the harmony of a system planned to handle masses of children. These are the so-

unmanageable boys and girls. These are, with scarcely an exception, children who are strongly individualized and respond in a perfectly normal and wholesome way to individual treatcalled

ment.

The last two classes

represent the children

who would

1The Psychological Clinic, Vol. Ill, No. 6, November 15, 1909, p. 164.

(46)

soon

47

RESPONSIBILITY FOR RETARDATION.

be eliminated were they compelled to attend a public school. It has been our policy to accept these children when they apply if there is a vacant seat. We, therefore, undoubtedly show a greater

proportion

of retardation than the average

public

Our

school.

school accommodates 200 pupils through the first eight grades. In this study I have omitted the kindergarten. Our pupils were asked to fill out the 1.

Name.

2.

Nationality

3.

Where

4.

Date of your birth? How long have you attended the Normal ?

5.

6.

were

8.

Have you ever been out of school for long have you been out 1 Why ?

9.

What studies do you like best ? Why do you like them ?

10. 11. 13. 15.

Have you ever repeated the work of any If so, which grade?

16.

Why

17.

Have you

were

what The was

How

Have you ever had any teachers you did not like? Why did you not like them ?

14.

obliged

you ever

had

a

repeat? promotion?

to

double

grade ?

If

so

in

grades?

answers were

thoroughly

frank.

The children felt that history and in many

interested to know their whole school

volunteered additional data after

they had talked with their replies were supplemented by knowledge which previously obtained in conversation with the parents and Their

parents. I had

data

?

a term

Are there any studies you do not like? Why did you not like them?

12.

cases

of parents. you born ?

What other schools have you attended ? Why did you change ?

7.

I

following questionaire:

on

file in the office.

The and took

answers to us

so

questions 9, 10, 11,

and 12

were so

suggestive

far afield that I have reserved them for another

paper and will only refer to them The results of the inquiry bear

incidentally. us

out in the

presumption that Taking six years

have our full share of retarded children. the standard age for the first grade we find 76 retarded children; this is 38 per cent of our total enrolment. The following table shows the amount of retardation:

we as

48

THE PSYCHOLOGICAL CLINIC. Retarded. 1 2 3 4

It will be When are even

36 25 8 7

seen at a

which looked at with the

Total number.

year years years years

glance

superficially

that there

would

cause

are

only

fifteen

cases

apprehension.

the consideration of the individual cases for the retardation, we find the problematic cases fewer than this table would indicate. That retardation we come to

causes

is not

necessarily an indication of inferior mental ability is shown following table. I have taken the average standings of the retarded children in all their school work, using the terms excellent, very good, good, fair, poor and very poor in their usual significance. These standings are compared with the number of

by

the

years

or

retardation.

Standing. 1 11 6 10 8 1

Excellent

Very good Good Fair Poor

Very

Retardation in Years. 2.3 6 5 10 1 3

poor

..

..

..

3 2 1 2

..

4

..

1 2 2 1

Total No. 17 12 24 13 7 3

special classes for the weak and special classes for the exceptionally strong who may be able to go faster than the average of the class, with daily physical training in a thoroughly equipped gymnasium, with considerable emphasis upon the manual arts, together with an attempt to bring both material and method of instruction into accord with the children's needs and aptitudes, we have succeeded in securing a very fair standard of achieveAll but ten of the retarded ment in the formal work of the grades. children carry the formal work of their grades with an average of seventy-five or above. Only four of these ten cases are discouraging. Three of these four are entered as very poor in the table. With

None of the three has been with us a full year. One entered but This is a child of ten who has attended school regua month ago. larly since he was six years of age. His ability to read and write

grade pupils. He is listless defect other than a physical inert, yet has corrected been vision which of defect by glasses. In slight fact he seems rather above the average child of ten in physical development. Until within a week ago we were inclined to beis

scarcely equal

and

to that of

there is

no

our

first

trace of

RESPONSIBILITY FOR RETARDATION. lieve that he

special

defective mentally, although we had made no He is now showing signs of a mental awakening made considerable progress under individual instruc-

was

tests.

and has

lately Every success

tion. case

49

bids fair

may do in the

This has become an added spur to effort. a another of what school instance merely

to prove case

interest, impede

of

a

mental

normal but rather slow child to deaden and blight the future.

growth

Another of the failures is

a young lad who entered our eighth few weeks' trial it was found necessary to place him in the seventh grade. Even here his average standing is very poor. He has bad habits, is indifferent to all appeals that a school

grade.

After

a

make. We are certain that the rather than mental. can

difficulty here is moral, though,

The third

case is that of a girl who has a bad heredity and The report of her teachers is unienvironment. home poor wills to that when she apply herself she is capable of good formly a

work.

There is

no

mental defect here, but a defect of will which fatal in its consequences.

even more

may prove The fourth case which I have cited as discouraging is a child in our first grade. She is the only pupil in the grade who is a repeater. This child has been graded poor. While she has

to read and will undoubtedly be able to do regular school work within certain limits, she shows signs of mental defect, chiefly in flighty attention, poor motor control and general per-

learned

versity of conduct. Referring to

the table

the best work is done two years.

There is

four years has a member of dreaded

by

above,

it is

children who

one case

apparent

are not

in which

a

at once

retarded

girl

more

that than

who is retarded

standing of very good. This girl is yet She came to us because she our seventh grade. classed with younger children in an ordinary public received

a

being In maturity

of judgment and ability to express herself, rank well if classed with those of her own age. this girl would The years of school lost have not meant any real arrest of development. There is another case of four years' retardation in our school.

seventh grade with an average standing of good. The history is very similar to the preceding one. A young girl was kept out of school on account of her own illness and that of her mother until she found her former schoolmates far beyond her. Another fact is brought out strongly in this table. Twentyour very best pupils belong to the retarded class. Sixtysix of those whose work ranks considerably above passable, evi-

nine of

50

THE PSYCHOLOGICAL CLINIC.

power to grapple with school problems, are retarded. In about eighty-seven per cent of our retarded pupils considerable possess ability when given an opportunity for individual expression and initiative. If we follow Cornell's classifition of the defective children in the public schools, these eightyseven per cent would necessarily fall in his first class as children who have not reached their own best development because of poor

dencing other

words,

health and other disabling factors. The rest, with the of the one would fall into his second class. These exception child, he calls the dull children who are slow mentally and in school

general

in behavior and ordinary conversation. He finds about ten per cent of the younger school children belong to this class. We have only one pupil who could be placed in his

work, though intelligent

third class of backward children and none who would belong to his fourth group of feeble minded. Retardation, so far as this study goes, cannot be taken as an index of inferior mental ability. It is much more likely to be due to an unfortunate combination of circumstances in which

society

it is

as

seems to

have

progress. If it studies of

represented in the home and the average school conspired with other factors, as ill health, to hinder

were

possible

retardation,

Classifying

causes

individual histories,

to

we

at individual histories in other

get

undoubtedly find similar results. of retardation after a detailed study of find the following factors operative:

we

would

1. Late entrance into school. 2. An additional grade called the between the

kindergarten

and first

connecting class inserted grade, now abolished in our

school. 3. A

change

in school with

imperfect adjustment

at time of

change. 4. Inefficient schools.

This is

necessarily

a

general

term

which includes several specific causes as, overcrowded classes, poor systems of promotion, lack of sympathy with and comprehension of the pupils on part of teacher, poor methods of instruction, and matter poorly adapted to children's needs and interests. This includes

5. Illness. as

those of

briefer term,

a

of

cases

in

resulting

prolonged illness as well irregular and interrupted

attendance. 6. thus

Physical

present 7.

defects which

were

imperfectly

remedied and

constant sources of loss.

the home and

difficulties due to

of

foreign language consequent imperfect mastery of English.

Language

use

a

in

RESPONSIBILITY FOR RETARDATION.

51

8. Slow mental

development. following table shows these factors as they appeared, we could estimate, according to years of retardation.

The far

as

?

?

?s

ell5

?

a

?-3^3 12 14

1 2

a-s

J-s Sfio

-flu

Ocq

cu i-hcQ

9 5

8 10

3 7

So

-

Our Responsibility for Retardation.

Our Responsibility for Retardation. - PDF Download Free
4MB Sizes 2 Downloads 8 Views