Clinical Infectious Diseases Advance Access published January 6, 2014

1  Impact of IDSA/PIDS Guidelines on Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in

cr ipt

Hospitalized Children

Rachael K. Ross1, Adam L. Hersh2, Matthew P. Kronman3, Jason G. Newland4, Talene A. Metjian5, A. Russell Localio6, Theoklis E. Zaoutis7, Jeffrey S. Gerber7

Division of Infectious Diseases and the Center for Pediatric Clinical Effectiveness, The

Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA

Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, University of Utah, Salt

an

Lake City, UT

Division of Infectious Diseases, Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, WA

4

Division of Infectious Diseases, Children’s Mercy Hospitals and Clinics, Kansas City, KS

5

Office of Patient Safety and Quality, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA

6

Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of

M

3

7

pt ed

Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA

Division of Infectious Diseases and the Center for Pediatric Clinical Effectiveness, The

Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA; Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA

ce

Address for Correspondence: Rachael K. Ross, MPH, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, 3535 Market Street, Suite 1514, Philadelphia, PA 19104. Phone (267) 426-1380. Fax (215) 590-

Ac

2025. Email: [email protected] Alternate Corresponding Author: Jeffrey S. Gerber, MD, PhD, The Children’s Hospital of  Philadelphia, 3535 Market Street, Suite 1518, Philadelphia, PA 19104. Phone (267) 426‐ 8775. Fax (267) 426‐0380. Email:  [email protected]

© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of  America. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e‐mail: [email protected]

Downloaded from http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/ at Aston University on January 21, 2014

2

us

1

2  Key Points: Following the publication of PIDS/IDSA guidelines for management of community-acquired pneumonia, prescribing of ampicillin and amoxicillin for children

cr ipt

hospitalized with pneumonia has increased but remains low. Cephalosporin and macrolide prescribing has decreased but remains common.

ABSTRACT

children hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia. Prescribing of ampicillin/amoxicillin

an

increased following guideline publication, but remains low. Cephalosporin and macrolide prescribing decreased but remains common. Further studies exploring outcomes of and reasons

Ac

ce

pt ed

M

for compliance with guidelines are warranted.

 

Downloaded from http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/ at Aston University on January 21, 2014

us

We examined the impact of PIDS/IDSA guidelines that recommend ampicillin or amoxicillin for

3  INTRODUCTION Pediatric community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) accounts for over 500,000 emergency

cr ipt

department visits and 7% of pediatric hospitalizations in the US annually [1, 2]. Pneumonia

accounts for more days of antimicrobial therapy than any other indication for admission to US children’s hospitals [3].

Society of America (IDSA) published guidelines for the management of CAP in children [4].

an

Because Streptococcus pneumoniae is the most common bacterial cause of pediatric CAP and narrow-spectrum -lactam antibiotics effectively target S. pneumoniae, these guidelines

hospitalized with CAP.

M

recommended penicillin or ampicillin/amoxicillin as first-line therapy for most children

pt ed

Prior to the publication of the guidelines, fewer than 10% of hospitalized children with CAP received penicillin or ampicillin/amoxicillin; most children received cephalosporins, and prescribing varied significantly across physicians and institutions [3, 5-7]. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of the PIDS/IDSA guidelines on antibiotic prescribing for

ce

children hospitalized with non-severe, uncomplicated CAP.

Ac

METHODS

Study Design and Data Source We performed a longitudinal analysis to examine the effect of PIDS/IDSA CAP guideline publication on antibiotic choice for children hospitalized with CAP. Data were obtained from the

 

Downloaded from http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/ at Aston University on January 21, 2014

us

In October 2011, the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (PIDS) and the Infectious Diseases

4  Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS), a comparative clinical and administrative database that contains information from 43 freestanding U.S. children’s hospitals, which represent 17 of

cr ipt

the 20 major metropolitan areas. The analysis was restricted to 38 hospitals after excluding institutions with data quality issues with service date and prescribing data.

Study Population

March 31, 2013 with CAP identified using a previously validated algorithm [8]. The algorithm

an

was validated in the PHIS database using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9) codes and had a positive predictive value (PPV) of

M

89.6% for identifying CAP using a primary diagnosis of pneumonia, excluding patients with complex chronic conditions (CCC) [9]. To restrict the population to children with non-severe, uncomplicated pneumonia, we excluded patients with an ICD-9 code for effusion or empyema;

pt ed

two or more consecutive days of mechanical ventilation and/or vasopressors; or an ICD-9 code for colonization, infection, or history of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection.

ce

Outcomes

The primary outcome was the rate of prescribing of guideline recommended first-line antibiotic

Ac

therapy, defined as one or more days of amoxicillin, ampicillin or penicillin. Secondary outcomes included the rate of prescribing of cephalosporins and macrolides.

 

Downloaded from http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/ at Aston University on January 21, 2014

us

We included patients from 6 months to 18 years of age discharged between October 1, 2009 and

5  Statistical Analysis Using a longitudinal piece-wise logistic model with a knot at October 2011 (guideline

cr ipt

publication date), we modeled the trajectory of prescribing before and after guideline publication [10]. Patients were grouped by month, which was included as a linear variable. We examined potential confounders including age, sex and insurance status; none of these variables

meaningfully changed the model estimates and thus were not included in final models. Standard

probabilities of prescribing for each month. For macrolides, probabilities were standardized by

an

season because of seasonal variation.

M

To investigate the effect of the guidelines by hospital, we fit piece-wise logistic models for each of 18 hospitals that provided data for at least 75% of the time period and averaged at least 20 patients per month. The marginal analysis results for recommended first-line therapy of these 18

pt ed

hospitals were similar to the results of the analysis of all 38 hospitals.

Analyses were conducted using Stata version 12.1 (Stata, Corp.; College Station, TX).

ce

RESULTS

There were 44,133 admissions for children with CAP across 38 hospitals. After excluding

Ac

children with effusion, empyema, mechanical ventilation, vasopressor use, or MRSA, 38,819 admissions were included.

 

Downloaded from http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/ at Aston University on January 21, 2014

us

errors were adjusted for clustering by hospital. For each antibiotic therapy, we obtained the

6  Guideline Recommended First-line Therapy During the 42-month study period, 28% of all hospitalized children received ampicillin or

cr ipt

amoxicillin (

Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society guidelines on treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized children.

We examined the impact of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society/Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines that recommend ampicillin or amo...
442KB Sizes 0 Downloads 0 Views

Recommend Documents