Genitourinary Andrew
Yang,
MD,
MS
#{149} Jacek
L Mostwin,
MD,
PhD
#{149} Neil
B. Rosenshein,
Radiology
MD
#{149} Elias
A. Zerhouni,
MD
Pelvic Floor Descent in Women: Dynamic Evaluation with Fast MR Imaging and Cinematic Display’ The authors present a new method for assessing pelvic prolapse with dynamic fast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Twenty-six women with signs and symptoms suggesting pelvic prolapse and 16 control subjects were studied with a series of fast (6-12-second) MR images. Sagittal and coronal images were obtained with graded increase in voluntary pelvic strain, allowing for dynamic display and quantification of the pelvic prolapse process. The distance from the pubococcygeal line was used as an internal reference for measurement of descent in the maximal strain position. With use of control results for normal limit values, prolapse involving the anterior pelvic compartment (cystocele), the middle compartment (vaginal prolapse, uterine prolapse, and enterocele), and the posterior compartment (rectocele) was easily demonstrated. Significant differences between control subjects and patients with prolapse were seen at maximal strain but not in the relaxed state. Quantification of the pelvic descent process with use of fast MR imaging may be of value in surgical planning and postsurgical follow-up.
P
ELVIC
terms: Pelvic viscera, MR studies, 80.1214
prolapse,
85.91
#{149}
1991;
179:25-33
From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology (A.Y., E.A.Z.) and the Departments of Urology (J.L.M.) and Gynecology and Obstetrics (N.B.R.), The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore; and Schultze & Snider & Associates, Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore (A.Y.). From the 1990 RSNA scientific assembly. Received June 19, 1990; revision requested August 6; revision received December 18; accepted December 26. Address reprint requests to A.Y., 1 106 Gittings Ave. Baltimore, MD 21239. C RSNA, 1991 See also the article by Kruyt et al (pp 159163) in this issue. I
prob-
pelvic floor is mild and not of immediconcern, it may result in
clinical
cases
pain, sociably debilitating stress, total urinary or fecal incontinence, ureterab obstruction, and, in the case of rectal prolapse, constipation and possible rectal ulceration (4). The causes of incontinence and pelvic discomfort are numerous, and the surgeon needs supporting
evidence
to document
pelvic prolapse as the major or contributing cause. The surgical approach to repair depends on precise identification of the pelvic compartments
involved.
examiners.
Existing
methods
of ra-
diobogic evaluation include a series of imaging studies. Bead-chain cystometrography to measure the posterior urethrovesicab angle (5-7), video cystourethrography and cystometrography
with
surement,
sphincter
and
to evaluate
ment,
the
pressure
sonography anterior
vaginography the
middle
mea-
are
is used
barium
pudding
is used
to evaluate Enterocele
used
compart-
to evalu-
compartment,
and
defecography the posterior is not
(8-10) com-
easily
more, ies
three
compartments.
performing
is uncomfortable
Further-
some for
of these the
report
fast
imaging
presents
a new
magnetic in the
method,
resonance
sagittab
(MR)
plane
with
various degrees of pelvic strain, quantification of pelvic descent three compartments. SUBJECTS
AND
for in all
METHODS
Subjects Twenty-six women mean, 56 years) with
(aged 39-86 stress urinary
tinence
symptoms
(5,6)
or other
years; inconsuggest-
ing vaginal or rectal prolapse (10), such as “lump falling down, mass in vaginal introitus with strain, and red lump in rectal area with strain with or without pain and in evacuating
rectum,”
were
re-
ferred for dynamic MR imaging. Sixteen volunteers (aged 27-71 years; mean, 44 years)-women referred for other suspected pelvic pathologic conditions, such as endometriosis or hip pain, but with no history of urinary or fecal incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, or gynecologic malignancy and no abdominal pain at the time of the study-were imaged as normal control subjects. Informed consent was obtained in all cases. Two of the 16 subjects had undergone Nine of the 26 women
control
tomy.
with
hysterecstress
urinary incontinence or symptoms of prolapse were without a uterus (eight had undergone hysterectomy and in one the uterus was congenitally absent). All but two of the control subjects were parous. Two of the patients were nulliparous.
vi-
sualized without contrast enhancement of the small bowel. None of these studies provide an overall view of all
This
using
difficulty
Physical examination is not always reliable and may be difficult to quantify or not be reproducible between
partment. Radiology
in most
weakness ate
is a common
in older multiparous women, after hysterectomy, with a prevalence of up to 16% (1-
3). While
ate Index Pelvis,
prolapse
lem especially reported
stud-
patients
and some require relatively high radiation exposure from lateral view fluoroscopy and spot radiography. The high rate of failure to ameliorate symptoms and of recurrence of symptoms in each of the three pelvic compartments suggest inadequacies in existing methods of preoperative evaluation (11).
Imaging All
formed
Technique
MR imaging studies were peron 1.5-T units (Signa; GE Medical
Systems, Milwaukee). Routine resting coronal Ti-weighted, axial and sagittal spin-density, and T2-weighted 5-mm-
thick sections fine anatomy
were first obtained and exclude other
to depelvic
disease.
The dynamic in the
sagittal
ent recalled pulse
fast images plane
with
acquisition
sequence
(repetition
were
obtained
use of a gradi-
in a steady time,
state 22-25
msec; echo time, flow compensation; and
13 msec; 30#{176} flip angle; 10-mm-thick section; 256 X 256 matrix and two averages 25
[12
seconds]
or
averages
128
tients,
additional
tamed All
with images
pended
coronal
respiration
untary floor
maneuvers in relaxed
strain, (c) imal pelvic
des gans
(f)
strain
for vol(a) pelvic pelvic
maximal
ability
pelvic The as if you
posi-
strain, (d) maxmaximal pelreproducibility of
to contract and to be reduced
down
supine
instructed
(e) repeat
to assess
pelvic
ob-
pelvic
strain, to ensure
maximal ducibility.
were
as follows: state, (b) mild
effort,
traction
two
pa-
parameters. with sus-
the
were
moderate
strain
and
images
in
The patients
maximal
matrix
In selected
use of the same were obtained
tion.
vic
X 256
[6 seconds]).
conmus-
ability of pelvic voluntarily, and
strain specific
was
perineal of levator
repeated instruction
the are
(g)
for
following:
reprofor
“Bear
constipated
trying to have a bowel that position starting instruction for perineal
or-
and
movement. now.” The contraction
are
Hold specific was
the following: “Squeeze your buttocks together as if you are having diarrhea and did not want to soil yourself. Hold that position
wall
starting with
bulge
now.” pelvic
creasing descent the patient was tions. The study the patients to claustrophobia, data. The in
except
were
then
displayed
1oop
cess. The dynamic imaging minutes to the conventional (including patient instruction In selected patients, the
Dynamic
helpful, ing
in coronal planes bladder base, vagina, not used in image
Patient
plane
shifts
dur-
their
underclothing that
removed,
incontinence were asked to imaging
bladder
full.
to be
half
placed
apart and the knees
The
in a neutral small added
be at the
patients’
slightly
placed Routine
under me-
compression
reduction
legs
position
foam pads comfort.
abdominal
could to void to allow
for
gent (Fig
extending of the line)
from
the
symphysis
was
1). The
to (a) portion
the
used
vertical
most
pubis
to the
joint
(pubococ-
as a reference
distance
bladder floor of the bladder),
inferior
tion
26
cuff, of the
relaxed
Posterior
(16) ± 1.13 ± 1.21 (15) 4.12 ± 1.28 1.88 ± 1.99 (1 1) 2.29 ± 0.99 -0.69 ± 0.83
0.51 1.12
(16) ± ± (20) 0.21 ± -226 ± (6) -0.16 ± -3.98 ±
3.89 2.95
0.72 1.44 0.79 1.44
from
and
Data
line
the
line
(the
most inferior (b) the most infe-
rectal
position
#{149} Radiology
(c)
the
air
was
and
with
most
inferior
measured
maximal
with
were
two use
made
MR imagers of
the
on-line
on
or on hard
internal
one
copies
sence
measurements
of prolapse
partrnents. por-
in
The
the
strain.
were
MR
0.27 -0.87
examination
imaging
the
16 control
to establish the presence
from
a discrimior ab-
in the
The charts
three
pelvic
corn-
of the 26 patients
retrospectively reviewed 6-18 months after MR imaging to see whether prolapse in each compartment was noted
and
on to surgery
cal findings body, bulge
Analysis
patients were used nant value to assess
at physical
went
scale.
tan-
nor portion of the cervix and-in the posthysterectomy patients (n = 1 1)-the vaginal
Middle
1.15 1.24 1.54 1.90 1.07 2.14
mo-
Measurements
of the last coccygeal
cygeal
(16) ± ± (14) 2.05 ± 0.19 ± (12) 1.84 ± -1.88 ±
Subjects
SD by Compartment
Anterior
2.23 1.26
[indicated
in Control
Note-While there is slightly more scatter among the prolapse patients, there was no statistically significant difference between the means of the two groups in the resting position. demonstrating the inadequacy of relaxed images in evaluating pelvic prolapse. However. the differences between control subjects and clinically positive patients were significant in the maximal strain position in each of the three compartments. Values in parentheses are numbers of patients. SD = standard deviation.
of the portion
Position
or Below
was not used.
Analysis
A line
Group
Controlsubjects Relaxed Maximal strain Clinically negative Relaxed Maximal strain Clinically positive Relaxed Maximal strain
maximal voluntary effort, were placed on waterproof
reassured
Image
Mean
strain.
expected. Patients least 2 hours prior
tion
1
and Maximal Strain Positions (in Centimeters Above by -1 Pubococcygeal Line) in the Three Pelvic Compartments and Patients with Suspected Pelvic Prolapse
as the anatomic
with
chanical
Table Resting
not
pads,
were
7
were
ensure patients
and
added about pelvic study time). dynamic se-
images
To the
pelvic pro-
axial
pelvic
1. Sagittal dynamic images of woman with intermittent urinary and fecal incontinence. The relaxed (a) and maximal pelvic strain (b) positions are illustrated. The vertical distance from the pubococcygeal line (PCL) to the bottom of the rectal air (R) in the maximal strain state is 5.5 cm, demonstrating a rectocele. The maximal descent in control subjects with strain was 2.5 cm. Note that with maximal strain, the vertical distances from the bladder base (BB) and the vaginal cuff (VC) to the pubococcygeal line are still within normal limits.
on-
of the prolapse
the
quences were repeated passing through the and rectum but were
b.
Figure
to demonstrate
relationship during
analysis.
a.
in-
for one exclusion due not included in the
a cinematic
the dynamic compartments
abdominal and the
with effort confirm that able to follow the instrucwas well tolerated by all
images
line
The strain
prior
whether
include defective of anterior vaginal
due to cystocele or of posterior vaginal
tocele
or enterocele, of vagina protrusion
or
to dynamic patients
in this period.
strain bulge sion actual
the
urethrocele, wall due
descent
Physi-
perineal wall
with to rec-
or protru-
uterus (procidentia), of rectal mucosa
and (recto-
cele). A patient was considered clinically positive if prolapse in a compartment was noted on a physical examination record. The patient was considered clinically
April
1991
anterior namic
compartment MR imaging
clinically
negative
(Fig showed patients
without cystocele and ically positive patients cele. However, ly negative
went
to be
nine of 12 dinto have cysto-
two of the three and MR-positive
on to undergo
sion
3), dy11 of 14
surgery,
with
clinicalpatients
bladder good
suspen-
results.
The
other patient with negative clinical examination and positive MR results had a history of hysterectomy, abdominal pain, and pain on defecation and demonstrated marked prolapse in all ‘
i.’:p
‘s
-
.-
tT__;\
three
compartments
--
*\
titis
Ms:
c. d. Figure 2. Sagittal dynamic images of postmenopausal woman with stress urinary incontinence and previous incontinence surgery. On relaxed position image (a), pelvic organs bladder (B) and top of vagina (V) are normally related. With mild pelvic strain (b), there is mild anterior bulging of abdominal wall and ing increased intrapelvic pressure. With marked vaginal prolapse are demonstrated.
gans are completely how
the
negative
reduced,
bladder
for
physical tion the
and
floor
rotates
that
compartment
examination findings
record of prolapse
mild descent of bladder and top of vagina, indicatmaximal voluntary strain (c), a large cystocele and With perineal contraction (d), the prolapsed orthe ability of the levator sling to contract is also shown. around the bladder neck.
pelvic
if the did not in that
mencom-
and
strain,
are illustrated.
test.
in Table
1 1 subjects,
measurements
ibility.
The
mean
and
cystica-improved
were
strain
position
ments
in the the
in
each
control
of the
and
correlation
the resting and was calculated
partments
coefficient strain
for each
of the
fers
popula-
Anterior
positions
three
corn-
Volume
Figure 179
2. The #{149} Number
relaxed,
1
three pelvic control subjects
prolapse 3-5. The
pubococcygeal
Posterior
are dis0 line re-
line.
below
images mild
is
strain used
tween
the
line.
limit of descent was the maximal descent
in the control as the discriminant
normal
and
group
abnormal.
and value
MR
imag-
Compartment
did not. The had prolapse at MR
remaining in all three
imaging
(Fig
6).
Compartment no more pubococcygeal
line with maximal strain in the control subjects (Fig 5). Five of six clinicabby positive patients demonstrated rectocele at MR imaging. The other
the bladder more than
pubococcygeal
after
The rectum descended than 2.5 cm below the
We
Compartment strain, descend
months
patients patients
compartments
for the in the
With maximal base should not cm
RESULTS in
tive two
groups in are shown
the lower limit of the control as the discriminant value.
The lower rived from
set of dynamic
and
between
in the two populations.
A typical
cystocele
1.
to the
used group
strain,
compart-
patient
maximal
A large
and patients with played in Figures
deviation
absolute difference between the two measurements were calculated for each of the three compartments. To assess whether the resting position could enable prediction of the maximal
seen
anterior
The vaginal cuff and cervix did not descend more than 1 cm above the pubococcygeal line with maximal strain in the control patients (Fig 4). With use of this criterion, 1 1 of 11 clinically positive patients demonstrated uterine or vaginal prolapse at MR imaging, 13 of 15 clinically nega-
are seen in this patient. and standard deviation
The results compartments
of the
tions,
after
ing-due to an enterocele that had developed in the interim. One patient who was MR negative and clinically positive had a large uterine fibroid and a normal cystometrogram and has not yet been operated on.
Middle
positions
for the control and patient each of the compartments
maximal strain reproduc-
standard
pelvic
contraction
procidentia The mean
made on two consecutive images to assess intrasession
maximal
perineal
partment. Discrepancies between physical examination and dynamic MR results were examined case by case. Differences between means were analyzed by means of a two-tailed Student In
im-
wall suspension. Only one patient who had negative MR but positive clinical examination results eventually underwent surgery-b
Note
at MR
aging. This patient was evaluated by an internist who did not do specific maneuvers to look for pelvic prolapse. One patient who was clinically and MR negative was operated on for metrorrhagia secondary to fibroids. The condition of the other-who had cys-
dewith is be-
In the
1
had a large uterine 20 clinically negative negative MR results
mass. Thirteen patients had for rectocele.
of
However, seven of 20 clinically negative patients demonstrated rectocele at MR imaging, as much as 5.8 cm below the pubococcygeal line. Four of the seven went on to undergo rectocele or enterocele repair. Radiology
#{149} 27
Five patients 7), all of whom Four
of these
had enterocebe were operated enteroceles
4
(Fig on.
were
3
de-
tected on MR images at initial examination. One patient had a defect in the Denonvilliers fascia at static MR imaging enterocebe
only.
Ten
months
later,
an
was demonstrated at physical examination. By MR imaging criteria, there were seven single-compartment prolapses, 1 1 two-compartment prolapses, and four three-compartment prolapses in the 26 patients. prolapse was
In four visualized
patients no on dynamic
We
then
looked
between
the
maximal
strain
was
at the
resting
and
For
0.31 0.59
for the for the
compartment, compartment,
and
0.73
for
the
ment.
In the
lation
coefficient
and
maximal
0.34, 0.68, the three
and
between
prevalence
after
aged
of pelvic
the
resting
was
N-16
in
-6
I
years
had
of vaginal
from
three-fourths
of them
the
were described as having urinary stress incontinence. Only 3% of the 515 desired treatment for their condi-
complaint,
tion, even
bladder
the
problem than the
is pa-
seen at gynecobogic or urobogic In 211 women with pelvic prevalence
of urinary
incontinence was 35% (3). Symptoms of pelvic prolapse indude stress or total urinary or fecal incontinence, urinary retention, constipation, and possible rectal ulcer(4).
Other
28 #{149} Radiology
bess
1
I
I
N-5 I
I
1
N-4 I
I
I
CLINICALLY
CLINICALLY
CLINICALLY
CLINICALLY
NEGATIVE
POSITIVE
POSITIVE
NEGATIVE
NOT
NOT
OPERATED
OPERATED
OPERATED
OPERATED
0.2%
nence,
ation
1
prolapse
ranges
incontinence;
the
I
weakness.
cations include and hemorrhoids The causes
prolapse,
I
Figure 3. Data showing results of resting position (D) and maximum strain () in anterior compartment in control and patient groups. The clinically negative and clinically positive groups (in the anterior compartment) are separated in a. Limits of normal are shown by dashed line. In b, the clinically negative and clinically positive groups are further divided into those who eventually went on to surgery and those who did not. Pubococcygeal line shown by solid line. Vertical scale is in centimeters.
to 43%, depending on the series (2). In an epidemiologic survey, 22% of 515 45-year-old women experienced
tients clinics.
N-i
N-1O
_.___L_ CONTROLS
b.
40-56
suggesting that more widespread
POSITIVE
corre-
the
positions respectively,
floor
hysterectomy
CLINICALLY
NEGATIVE
a.
compartments.
1,349 women
CLINICALLY
was
Pelvic prolapse is a common problem in older multiparous women. Hagstad et al (1) found that 16% of
The
CONTROLS
the
DISCUSSION
evidence
-6
compart-
group,
strain 0.74,
-5
of
the control coefficient
posterior
patient
-3
0.99,
for each
the compartments. group, the correlation
anterior middle
-2
correlation
position
position
0
-4
MR studies. The mean difference between two intrasession measurements of the descent at the maximal strain position was 0.32 cm ± 0.21 in the anterior compartment, 0.32 cm ± 0.25 in the middle compartment, and 0.36 cm ± 0.29 in the posterior compartment. The correlation coefficient (r) between the intrasession test and retest in the three compartments 0.99, and 0.94, respectively.
2
common
compli-
ness
most
associated
The
such bladder,
abnormalities
on
pelvic
compartment(s)
example, be repaired
precise vaginal with
existing
dle-suspension
as unstaand
of the
of therapy
pends
vaginal
intrinsic
abnormalities
choice
weak-
anterior
precise identification The surgical approach
However,
presenting
or attenuation,
or neurogenic
trmnsic
inconti-
anatomic
with
tocebes must be corrected separately. If the problem is a cystocele with anatomic stress incontinence due to a prolapsing bladder neck, the patient may benefit from transabdominal or transurethral urethropexy or a nee-
obstruction
common
include
prolapse ble
ureteral (12,13). of urinary
in-
urethra.
depends on of the cause.
de-
to repair
identification
of the
involved.
For
prolapse alone sacrab cobpopexy.
cystocebes
and
may
rhaphy
rec-
procedure.
Uterine
descent or rectocele alone may be better approached transvaginally, especiably if the patient is frail. The presence of enterocele requires additional repair to close the defect in the Denonvilliers fascia, and preoperative knowledge decreases the chance of accidental bowel damage during posterior colpoperineorThe
(4-6,14).
rates
of failure
and
recurrence April
1991
8
(which ed
prevent
as the
descent)
reason.
are
The
suggest-
frequency
of
6
prolapse
5
age
4
3
caused by the stress of pregnancy and not just that of vaginal delivery
2
alone
1
prevalence tiparous
0
in women
and
rising
That
by
damage
the
-4 -5
also
ligament, bevator applied
-6 -7
predisposes
to vaginal
4.
floor
did
not
prolapse. 3
is supportbroad ligauterosacral
pubocervicab ligament, and muscles. Yet, Mengert (17) traction to the cervix of caand sequentially severed each
davers of the potential tures. Surprisingly,
-8
is
increased
prolapse (11). The uterus ed by the round ligament, ment, paravaginal tissue,
-3
with
of prolapse among mulwomen who deliver by of cesarean section (16). Hys-
terectomy
-2
parity.
is suggested
means
-1
increases
pelvic
support an intact
interfere
with
However,
pelvic
severance
2
parametrial or paravaginal suIts in immediate descent.
0
With the the literature mechanism
chose
strucpelvic of the tissue
present uncertainty regarding the of pelvic support,
to measure
interaction
the
of the
net
rein
exact we
result
support
of the
structures
rather than the individual candidates for pelvic support. We chose the pubococcygeal line because it is easily measured and independent of the
-2 -3 -4
pelvic
-5
tilt
of the
patient.
Also,
com-
ponents of the pelvic floor, such as the pubococcygeab muscle, puborectal muscle, and pubovesical ligament, attach along this line. Thus, there is
-6 -7
-8
some theoretical line as a reference
CLINICALLY NEGATIVE
5.
basis for
for the
using pelvic
this
floor.
Figures
4, 5. Data showing results of resting position (D) and maximum strain (0) in middle (4) and posterior (5) compartments in control and patient groups. The patient group is divided into clinically positive and clinically negative sets. Limits of normal as derived from the control data are shown by dashed line. Pubococcygeal line shown by solid line. Vertical scale is in centimeters.
The
mechanism underlying stress incontinence is controversial. It is generally believed that intraabdominal pressure is transmitted
urinary
equally through the bladder and urethral neck as long as both are above the
after surgery for prolapse suggest inadequacies in existing preoperative evaluation (1 1). For example, of 236 patients reevaluated 1 year after vaginab or suprapubic continence surgery, only 70.6% considered themselves cured (15). In our series of 26 patients, eight had undergone unsuccessful incontinence or prolapse surgery. In many cases, physical examination by an experienced physician can determine
the
pelvic
compartment
involved, as seen by the high correlation between clinical and MR identification of prolapse in our patients. It is difficult to give accuracy data when physical examination is an imperfect standard of reference. However,
Volume
in our 179
small
study,
#{149} Number
MR
1
provid-
ed
additional
therapy the
information
regarding
anterior
tients, in the two patients, compartment experienced the compartments
particular lapse
pelvic
related
in other
MR
tative
and
prolapse
simultaneous
and
follow-up
the
allows
prolapse
is of
in
represents
levator
in men, muscles
and
the
or pubovesical
This
is a linear
pubourethrab
ligament
is unclear (20-22). But, with use of this structure, the anatomic descent of the bladder neck (rather than bladder
floor) is rare
images.
an intrinsic neck that was of the sagittal
structure of low signal intensity that extends from the inferior border of the symphysis pubis to the vesicourethral junction (Fig 8). Whether this
of
This
examina(eg,
nence (18,19). We have marker for the bladder well seen in about 50%
dynamic
postoperative
when physical are equivocal
prominent
travesical pressure overcomes urethral pressure, resulting in inconti-
quanti-
analysis
tion results obese patients).
Pelvic
bococcygeal
pro-
all three pelvic compartments. useful in objective documentation
neck (puin-
in
Dy-
provides
floor. As the bladder below the pelvic floor line), the unopposed
pa-
to their
overlook
compartments.
imaging
and
in two
middle compartment in and in the posterior in four patients. Less physicians may focus on
specialty
namic
descent
compartment
pelvic
descends
affecting
may
ligament
be measured.
toceles,
the
bladder
floor
rotational
may
In large descent
bring
cys-
of the
it substanRadiology
#{149} 29
lL.’i
tially inferior to the bladder neck (Fig 2). Whether the loss of abdominal pressure transmission to the blad-
der
or kinking
of the
urethra
ms ,
#{149}.% .
:sb
There
‘
l#{149}
plains the paradoxical lack of incontinence in some of these patients is unclear. Yet, if the patient has marked discomfort, surgical repair or placement of a pessary may still be required.
‘
,
.4fr
no statistically signifiat the resting position between the control, clinically negative, and clinically positive groups in each of the three compartments. This cant
L..
‘.
ex-
.
.
was
difference
suggests that the dynamic
static images
to differentiate
greater
patient
b.
popula-
tested whether position will
prolapse
a.
images without are insufficient
the
tions. We then tial low resting
-.
in each
mi-
an result
of the
in
three
compartments. However, the correlation was low between the positions of the bladder, cervix or vaginal cuff, and rectum at rest and the positions
at maximal
strain.
This
suggests
that
resting position does not allow prediction of the maximum prolapse position well. Other parameters that can be mea-
sured dude
on the spin-echo images inthe thickness of the muscles
composing
the
length
of the
pelvic
ness and integrity muscle ring. On
echo
images,
ethral
angle
bead-chain anorectal
the
and
the
dynamic
vesicour-
measured
on
cystometrograms angle (5-8) measured (Fig
9) can
measurements extent that,
curving be drawn
be
and
6. Relaxed sagittal (a) and coronal (c) and maximal strength sagittal (b) and coronal images in patient with prolapse in all three compartments. The coronal images were taken through the middle compartment. With strain, the levator muscle sling (arrow) is stretched by the prolapsing vagina. The left and right distance between the muscles also increases. However, compared with the horizontal resting position of the muscle, the levator appears more vertically oriented and is more parallel to the direction of the prolapse. It is possible that a larger vector of muscle force is in the direction of the prolapse. Coronal images may be useful in assessing levator function. B bladder, V vagina.
the on
estimated.
are subjecfor a continu-
structure, at several
the tangents locations,
depending and rectal
on the distention,
degree of bladder respectively.
However,
at least
the
free of the projectional cation errors inherent ray cystometrograms grams.
Figure
(d)
gradient-
posterior
(5,6,14)
These two tive to the
thick-
of the periurethral
the
defecograms
ously may
floor,
urethra,
MR
images
are
and magnifiin routine xand defeco-
mesenteric or retroperitoneal fat that is often present in this defect, even on relaxed images. During maximal
try
pelvic
strain,
od,
herniate ing an
through enterocele
enterocele ing
Other anatomic causes of incontinence, such as a scarred, low-compliance urethra or fistulas, can coexist with pelvic prolapse, and the radiologist should search for them on the spin-echo images. An important advantage of dynam-
the
the
this (Fig
is not stress
small
bowel
may
defect, produc7b). Even if an
demonstrated
images,
the
durreferring
surgeon should be alerted to the defect because of the potential for future herniation or the potential presence of a low-lying bowel ioop that may be damaged by cautery during
posterior
vaginal
repair.
nective tissue between the posterior wall of the vagina and the anterior wall of the rectum (4,23) (Fig 7a).
Precise instructions for the patient are important to ensure that the correct maneuvers are used. We use permeal contraction to document that the patient understands the concept of pelvic relaxation and strain. We always instruct the patient to repeat the maximum pelvic strain to ensure reproducibility of maximal effort. We
This
continue
ic MR imaging the visualization
of pelvic prolapse of enteroceles.
lowing hysterectomy, exist in the rectovaginal the
Denonvilliers
defect
30 #{149} Radiology
a defect may septum or
fascia,
is visible
is Fol-
a loose
because
con-
of the
to encourage
the
patient
to
harder
until
position
the
appears
ly four the
ibility
maximal
strain
reproducible,
to six times. mean
usual-
With
this
intrasession
meth-
reproduc-
was 0.32, 0.32, and
0.36 cm, re-
spectively, in the three pelvic compartments. Differences in descent below 0.5 cm are probably within measurement imprecision. We do not yet have enough data for long-term intersession reproducibility. The Valsalva maneuver is not identical to pelvic strain in that penneal contraction can take place simultaneously with the Valsalva maneu-
yen. and the the
We use
graded
pelvic
strain
steps
observation of the slight bulge of abdominal wall and descent of pelvis to confirm effort and com-
pliance
with
the
overdistended prolapse.
should
ceeding
instructions.
bladder In
be
such
asked
with
the
a case,
An
may the
to void
prior
study.
The
prevent patient
to pro-
postApril
1991
I
Figure
7. (a) Five-millimeter-thick (left) and axial (right) Ti-weighted echo images (repetition time, time, 20 msec) showing fat (F) in the Denonvilliers fascia or septum. (b) Sagittal (top) and
sagittal spin600 msec; echo in the defect rectovaginal coronal (bot-
tom) fast images of same patient as in a. With maximal strain, the poised small bowel loop herniates through the defect (D) in the Denonvilliers fascia to produce a large enterocele (E). With perineal contraction, the enterocele is reduced. Note that there is no cystocele. Elongated cervix (EC) is seen in chronic prolapse. Note increase in transverse diameter (TD) of the pelvic floor with strain. B = bladder, C = cervix, DF degenerating fibroids, LM levator muscle, PM puborectal muscle, R rectum, SB small bowel, U = uterus.
may
underestimate
the
extent
of nec-
tab descent
if there is no rectal air at all. It is possible to mark the anal verge with contrast material such as gadopentetate dimeglumine used with dilution or baby oil. The overestimation of rectal air due to susceptibility was small, on the order of 1-3
mm, and may be reduced by increasing the flip angle or using newer partial-Fourier spin-echo pulse sequences. sualized, na (hence sometimes
there
While the cervix is well vithe lower limit of the vagithe vaginal length) is not measurable. When
is a question
of the
vaginal
as to the
location
or cervix,
we
cuff
use
the static spin-echo images to confirm the anatomy. The pressure causing the pelvic prolapse process in the supine position is limited by voluntary
effort
and
dominal
the
strength
musculature
derestimated the upright
compared position.
adequate
data
of the
and
on the
We
may
with do
effect
ab-
be un-
that in not have
of parity,
as there was a mixture of live vaginal deliveries, miscarriages, cesarean sections, and hysterectomies in our study and our numbers were too small to be specific. Furthermore, we did not have enough control subjects to derive age- or parity-specific normal limits of pelvic descent. Our present suggestions for indications for dynamic MR imaging of pelvic prolapse are shown in Table 2. Additional indications may evolve as urologists and gynecologists are introduced to this new imaging meth-
b.
od. The voiding
residual
ed as well. and maximal
are used steps
temporal during There
Volume
volume
is then
While only the strain sagittal
in data
allow
the graded display of the relationships
spatial
the prolapse are some
179
resting images
analysis,
cinematic
and
not-
process. potential
#{149} Number
1
improvement technique. We have further
tamed simultaneous measurements of intraabdominal or intravesical pressure and cannot measure urodynamic parameters such as detrusor
instability. areas
for
in this imaging not as yet ob-
rectum
The amount is variable,
and
of air in the this
technique
quantitative
vic prolapse with clinical
of surgery,
evidence
should data
of pel-
be integrated to decide what
if any,
type
is indicated.
CONCLUSION We have invasive
developed method
a simple
to quantify
nonsimulta-
Radiology
#{149} 31
neously pelvic
MR od
pelvic
prolapse
compartments
imaging. so that
in all three with
use
of fast
the
meth-
We designed it may
mented on most with commerdially
be
easily
imple-
clinical MR available
imagers fast
pulse sequences. The limits of normal descent with maximal strain are 1 .0 cm below the pubococcygeal line for the bladder base, 1 .0 cm above for the vaginal cuff or lower end of the cervix, and 2.5 cm below for the redtal air. Preliminary results suggest this method will augment and possi-
bly
replace
methods common
some in the clinical
existing evaluation problem.
imaging of this U
Acknowledgments: We thank Renate Soulen, MD, Renee Genadry, MD, Marc Pessar, MD, Robert McLellan, MD, and Shirley Yang, MD, for encouragement and MR imaging technologists Kathy Lipinski, RT, Robin Franz, RT, Clark Pool, BA, RT, Wen Liu, RT, Mary Lally, RT, Keith Penn, RT, Cheryl Moser, RT, Laura Prevost, RT, and Hugh Wall, RT, for their good-humored patience and technical assistance.
References 1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
32
Hagstad A. Janson P0, Lindstedt G. Gynaecological history, complaints, and examinations in a middle-aged population. Maturitas 1985; 7(2):115-128. Cruikshank SH. Preventing posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse and enterocele during vaginal hysterectomy. Am Obstet Gynecol 1987; 156:1433-1440. H#{216}rding U, Pedersen KH, Sidenius K, Hedegaard L. Urinary incontinence in 45year-old women: an epidemiological survey. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1986; 20:183186. Zacharin RF. Pelvic floor anatomy and the surgery of pulsion enteroceles. Vienna: Springer-Verlag, 1985. Green TH. Urinary stress incontinence: pathophysiology, diagnosis and classification. In: Buchsbaum HJ, Schmidt JD, eds. Gynecologic and obstetric urology. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1982; 199-224. Raz S. Evaluation of urinary incontinence. In: Buchsbaum HJ, Schmidt JD, eds. Gynecologic and obstetric urology. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1982; 225-238. McGuire E. Causes of involuntary unnary loss and ways to recognize them. In: McGuire E, ed. Urinary incontinence. Or-
#{149} Radiology
the ages. With
portion of the symphysis pubis (P) to the the vesicourethal junction on the relatively Relaxed image is on the left and maximal strain maximal strain, the bladder base (arrow) descends
inferior
marker
for
Table 2 Current Suggestions
for Dynamic
MR Imaging
vesicourethral junction and provides low-contrast gradient recalled imimage is on the right. B bladder. below the vesicourethral junction.
Evaluation
1. Patients with incontinence or other symptoms of prolapse but study or physical examination results Postoperative patients with recurrence of incontinence or prolapse Serial follow-up of patients conservatively treated to document Patients with suspected enterocele or multicompartment prolapse Patients unable to tolerate contrast media or available radiographic of prolapse 6. Older children or young adults with imperforate anus. prior anatomy and to demonstrate ability of levator muscles to contract 7. As a research tool to investigate biomechanics of pelvic prolapse based on the findings
2. 3. 4. 5.
of Pelvic with
equivocal
a
Descent urodynamic
improvement procedures
for evaluation
to reconstruction, and
to design
to define new
therapies
April
1991
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
4
14.
15.
a.
16.
ri
17.
18.
19.
11
20.
.
21.
22.
23.
Figure gram
9.
Estimation
(a) and
MR imaging. in a and
between
Volume
179
of posterior
anorectal
Note
angle
change penineal
#{149} Number
measured
vesicourethral angle on defecogram
in the two angles contraction
1
and
between maximal
measured (b) with
relaxed strain
on use
and
positions
bead-chain of noninvasive
maximum
strain
Whitehead WE, Schuster MM. Anorectal physiology and pathophysiology. Am Gastroenterol 1987; 82:487-497. Mahieu P, Pringot J, Bodart P. Defecography. I. Description of a new procedure and results in normal patients. Gastrointest Radiol 1984; 9:247-251. Mahieu P. Pringot J, Bodart P. Defecography. II. Contribution to the diagnosis of defecation disorders. Gastrointest Radiol 1984; 9:253-261. Morley GW, Delancey JD. Sacrospinous ligament fixation for eversion of the vagina. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 158:872881. Delaere K, Moonen W, Debruyne F, Jansen T. Hydronephrosis caused by cystocele: treatment by colpopexy to sacral promontory. Urology 1984; 24:364-365. Heslop JH. Piles and rectoceles. Aust N Z J Surg 1987; 57:935-938. Blaivas JG, Olsson CA. Stress incontinence: classification and surgical approach. J Urol 1988; 139:727-731. Stocklin MW, Alder CG. Subjective and objective improvement of urinary incontinence in females following vaginal and abdominal incontinence operations. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 1986; 46:524-529. Taylor RW. Pregnancy after pelvic floor repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1966; 94:3539. Mengert WF. Mechanics of uterine support and position. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1936; 31:775-782. Enhorning G. Simultaneous recording of intravesical and intraurethral pressure. Acta Chir Scand 1961; 276(suppl):1-68. Jeffcoat TN, Roberts H. Observation on stress incontinence of urine. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1952; 64:721. Lierse W. Applied anatomy of the pelvis. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1984; 74-75, 148149. Pernkopf E. Atlas of topographic and applied human anatomy. Vol 2. Baltimore: Urban & Schwarzenberg, 1980; 337. Delancey JOL. Pubovesical ligament: a separate structure from urethral support (“pubo-urethral ligaments”). Neurourol Urodynamics 1989; 8:53-61. Kuhn RJ, Hollyock yE. Observations on the anatomy of the rectovaginal pouch and septum. Obstet Gynecol 1982; 59:445447.
cystometrodynamic
positions
in b.
Radiology
#{149} 33