Journal of Surgical Oncology 2015;111:352–358

Perineural Invasion in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Quantitative Subcategorisation of Perineural Invasion and Prognostication KARINA AIVAZIAN, MBBS,1 ARDALAN EBRAHIMI, MBBS, MPH, FRACS,2,3 TSU-HUI (HUBERT) LOW, FRACS,2 KAN GAO, B.Eng,3 ANTHONY CLIFFORD, FRACS,2 KERWIN SHANNON, FRACS,2 JONATHAN R. CLARK, M. Biostat, FRACS,2,3,4 AND RUTA GUPTA, MD, FRCPA1,2,4* 1

Department of Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia 2 Sydney Head and Neck Cancer Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia 3 Biostatistics, Sydney Head and Neck Cancer Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia 4 University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Background: Evidence regarding the prognostic value of perineural invasion (PNI) in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and whether PNI alone warrants consideration of adjuvant therapy is controversial. We evaluated whether histopathological sub‐categorization of PNI improves risk stratification. Methods: PNI was evaluated for nerve size, number of foci, and distance from the tumor in 318 OSCC patients. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed, with local failure (LF) and disease‐specific survival (DSS) as the primary endpoints. Results: PNI did not influence prognosis when classified as absent versus present. In contrast, multifocal PNI was associated with LF (P ¼ 0.049) and decreased DSS (P ¼ 0.043) on multivariable analyses. The size of the involved nerve separated those with multifocal PNI into intermediate (

Perineural invasion in oral squamous cell carcinoma: quantitative subcategorisation of perineural invasion and prognostication.

Evidence regarding the prognostic value of perineural invasion (PNI) in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and whether PNI alone warrants considerati...
387KB Sizes 0 Downloads 11 Views