Ge,ir. 104 (1991) 271-275 ic‘ 1991 Elsevier Science Publishers
GENE
B.V. All rights reserved.
271
0378-I 119/91/$03.50
05068
Production of functional rat HMGl protein in Escherichia (High-mobility
group-l
protein;
recombinant
DNA;
protein/DNA
coli
interactions)
Marco E. Bianchi Dipartimento di Genetica e Microbiologia, Universititdi Pavia. I-27100 Pavia (Italy) Received by J.-P. Lecocq: 28 January 1991 Revised/Accepted: 4 April/l5 April 1991 Received at publishers: 23 May 1991
SUMMARY
High-mobility group-l protein (HMG 1) was produced in Escherichiu colt’ under the control of the T7 promoter / T7 RNA polymerase system. The protein can be produced and purified with yields similar to those obtained from animal tissues. HMGI purified from E. coli is homogeneous and capable of selectively binding cruciform DNA, indicating that posttr~slationa~ processing of vertebrate HMGl is not necessary for its DNA-binding ability.
INTRODUCTION
High-mobility group-l protein (HMGI) is a nuclear protein which is extremely conserved in all vertebrates, but whose function has not been identified unequivocally (see Einck and Bustin, 1985, for a review). We recently found that HMG 1 selectively binds to cruciform DNA, a specific conformation of DNA that arises as an intermediate in genetic recombination or as a consequence of torsional stress on paIindromic sequences (Bianchi, 1988; Bianchi et al., 1989). Although HMGi is fairly easy to obtain by extraction of animal tissues with strong acids, these prepa-
Carres~nnderzce ia: Dr. M.E. Bianchi, biologia, Universitl
Dipartimento
di Pavia, via Abbiategrasso
Tel. (+39-382)3915X1; Abbreviations:
bp,
dithiothreitol;
FPLC,
di Genetica
e Micro-
207, I-271 00 Pavia (Italy)
Fax (+ 39-382)528496. base
pair(s);
fast-flow
DEAE,
protein
diethylaminoethyl;
DTT,
liquid chromatography;
4-(2-hydroxyethyl)piperazine-I-ethanesulfomc
acid; HMGI,
Hepes, high mobil-
ity group 1 protein; HMGl, cDNA encoding HMGI; IPTG, isopropyi~-~-thiogalactopyranoside; kb, kilobase or 1000 bp; nt, nucleotide(s); PMSF,
phenylmethylsulfonyl
SDS, sodium
dodecyl
sulfate;
fluoride;
RBS (rbs), ribosome-binding
[ ] designates
plasmid-carrier
state.
site;
rations are not reproducibly active in DNA binding. Even HMGl obtained from rat liver by a gentle, nondenaturing method (Marekov et al., 1984) is heterogeneous with respect to its DNA binding properties, despite migrating as a single band in SDS-polyacrylamide gels. A subpopulation of HMGl molecules can bind to cruciform DNA, while a large fraction of the preparation is uncapable of DNA binding (M.E.B., unpublished results). The protein fraction which binds to DNA can be reversibly denatured and renatured, whereas denaturation/renaturation cycles do not restore DNA binding ability to the inactive protein fraction. This behaviour can be attributed either to sequence microheterogeneities of the HMG 1 molecules (perhaps encoded by different genes), or to post-translational modifications. At present, no evidence exists for the former hypothesis; on the other hand, acetylation, glycosylation and ADP-ribosylation of HMGl have been reported (Reeves et al., 198 1). To prove that the unmodified polypeptide is indeed capable of binding to cruciform DNA, and to secure a source of chemically homogeneous protein, we expressed an HMGl cDNA clone in bacterial cells. The protein purified from the overproducing strain does bind selectively to cruciform DNA.
272 EXPERIMENTAL
AND
DISCUSSION
Production of rat HMGl in Eschevichia coli Initial attempts to produce HMGl in E. c,oli under the control of the luc of tv/) promoters/operators of various expression vectors were unsuccessful. To obtain a tighter
(a)
control of HMGI expression, we then decided to exploit the specificity of T7 RNA polymerase for T7 promoters. The expression vector we chose, pT7-7. is a derivative of pT7- 1 (Tabor and Richardson, 1985). It contains a fragment of T7 gene 10 comprising the T7 RNA polymerase promoter, the RBS, and the ATG start codon followed by a polylinker. We cloned the rat HA4GI cDNA from pRNHMG I (Bianchi et al., 1989) between the NdeI and HijldIII sites of pT7-7, so that the start codon of HMGl replaced cxactlq that of T7 gene 10. The resulting plasmid, pT7-RNHMG 1 (Fig. I), was introduced into E. coli AR68[ pGP I-21, which
pT7-RNHMGl
bla
\
ColEl
on
TTCGAAATTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGAGACCACAACGGTTTCCCTCTTAG rbs
Met Gly Arg
AATAATTTTGTTTAACTTTAAGAAGGAGATATACAT
atg ggc aaa
agtgtc
tttttttgtatagttGGGGATCCTCTAGAGTCGAGCGGCATGCAAGCTTATCATCGAT
Fig. 1. Map RNHMGI
and
sequence
was obtained
of plasmid
pT7-RNHMGl.
by introducing (HMGI
cDNA coding for HMGl
). The shaded
box represents
region ofHMGI, the open box the 3’-untranslated is the gene that confers resistance to ampicillin origin of replication (T7 promoter.
of the plasmid
arrowhead)
Plasmid
pT7-
into vector pT7-7 a part of the
(ColEl
ori, black dot). the promoter
and the RBS (r/x, blackened
of phage T7, and the start codon of HMGI
the coding
region. Also Indicated (hkr. thick arrow), the
in upper-case
(Paonessa
et al., 1987; accession
is indicated
in lower-case
letters.
The sequence
from rat HMGI
cDNA
No. YO0463 in the EMBL Data Library)
letters and extends
for 792 bp from the trans-
lation start site to 0.15 kb into the 3’.nontranslated region. The sequence in upper-case italics is a piece of the plJC19 polylinker and has been carried
over into pT7-RNHMGI
entire 924.bp sequence
as a result of the cloning strategy.
has been deposited
No. M63853 (rat high-mobility cds).
group-l
in GenBank
protein
synthetic
Similar problems are often encountered for the production of proteins which are toxic to E. cd, since the basal level of T7 RNA polymerase activity in uninduced cells can provide sufficient transcription of the target gene. The E. cdi strain BL21(DE3) harboring plasmid pLysE was specifically developed to solve these problems (Studier and Moffatt, 1986). In this strain T7 RNA polymerase is under the control of the inducible bcUV5 promoter, and its basal level of activity is specifically inhibited by T7 lysozyme, encoded on plasmid pLysE. Upon induction with IPTG, newly made T7 RNA polymerase titrates out its inhibitor, and then drives the expression of the target gene. We introduced pT7-RNHMGI into BL21(DE3)[pLysE]; cells were grown with vigorous agitation in LB medium containing chloramphenicol and ampicillin at 37°C. After reaching an absorbance of 0.7 (at 600 nm), the culture was induced with 0.5 mM IPTG and grown for an additional 2.5 h. Crude cell lysatcs were fractionated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and either stained directly or analysed by Western blotting with affinity-purified polyclonal anti-HMG 1 antibodies (Fig. 2). Induced BL21(DE3)[pLysE; pT7-RNHMGl] cells contained several immunoreactive polypeptides, absent from control samples. The band of highest M, was indistinguishable immunologically and elcctrophoretically from HMGl prepared from rat liver. The same band was visible in Coomassie stains of the SDS-polyacrylamidc gels, representing about 0.2 to I U, of the total protein content. However, the bulk of the immunoreactive material formed a diffuse band of higher mobility, which presumably derived from proteolysis of HMG I. Time courses of HMG I synthesis after induction confirmed a precursor-product relationship between the polypeptides of higher and lower M, (not shown), and indicated that the best yield of intact HMGl is obtained about 135 min after induction.
box) of gene IO
(ATG. thick margin of the box
representing HMGI ). The lower part of the figure shows the junctions between the vector and the insert. The sequence deriving from pT7-7 is indicated
contains the T7 RNA polymerase gene under the control of the /z pI, promoter and the temperature-sensitive Cl857 j. repressor (Tabor and Richardson, 1985). Although pT7RNHMGI was maintained in the AR68[pGPl-21 cells and after induction the T7 RNA polymerase was synthesized at high levels. we obtained low and irreproducible synthesis of HMG 1 protein.
The
under accession gene, complete
Purification of rat HMGl produced in Eschevichia coli A culture of BL21(DE3)[pLysE; pT7-RNHMGI] (10 liter) was grown in a pilot fermentor. Growth and induction were essentially identical to the small-scale conditions described in the preceding paragraph. The packed cells (45.7 g) were resuspended in 225 ml of buffer D-400 (20 mM Hepes pH 7.9/0.4 M NaCI:‘0.2 mM EDTA/0.2”,, nonidet-P40/l mM DTTjO.5 mM PMSF’IO”,, glycerol), frozen in liquid nitrogen, thawed and vigorously stirred. After an additional freeze/thaw cycle, 12 g of DEAE-cellu(b)
213 ammonium 97.4
sulfate/20
mM
Hepes
pH
7.9/0.2 mM
. 42.7
EDTA/O.S mM DTT. The material reactive against antiHMGl antibodies eluted at about 0.6 M ammonium sulfate. The pooled fractions (fraction II. 2 ml) were reduced to 0.3 ml with a Centriconmicroconcentrator and applied to a 30-ml Ultrogel AcA54 column equilibrated with 20 mM Hepes pH 7.9/200 mM KCl/0.2 mM glycerol. The fractions conEDTA/O.S mM DDTj5”;
- 31 .o
taining HMGl were pooled and labeled fraction III. Fraction III contained about 200 pg of HMG 1 protein, appeared to be more than 9504, pure (Fig. 3) and comigrated in SDS-polyacrylamide gels with HMGl purified
97.4
66.2 . 66.2 42.7
‘31 .o
from rat liver (data not shown). 21.5
- 21.5 . 14.4
- 14.4 Fig. 2. Production 37°C
and BLZl(DE3)[pLysE]
in LB broth
absorbance
in E. coli cells. Strains
of HMGl
pT7-RNHGMI]
in the presence
of antibiotics.
of 0.7 at 600 nm, both cultures
for 2.5 h in the presence
or absence
cells were then collected
and dissolved
loaded
were stained
rabbit
affmity-purified
goat anti-rabbit phatase.
L.anes:
l-5,
BL21(DE3)[pLysE] 2, induced
polyclonal
antibodies
duced
BLZl(DE3)[pLysE;
mentioned
points
antibodies,
proteins.
most
cells.
HMGl
prominent
in section b. Size markers
6 and
7, proteins cells; 7, in-
cells. The blackened
produced
- 42.7
from rat liver;
cells; 5, uninduced
Lanes:
proteolytic
- 66.2
phos-
1, uninduced
BL21(DE3)[pLysE]
pT7-RNHMGl]
- 97.4
BLZl(DE3)[pLysE]
pT7-RNHMGl]
blue; 6, induced
to full-length
to the
HMGl
to with
biotinylated alkaline
Lanes:
cells; 3, uninduced
pT7-RNHMGI]
with Coomassie
arrowhead
blue or transferred
were immunostained
anti-HMGl
immunostained
stained rowhead
proteins
BLZl(DE3)[pLysE;
1234
100 pg of total protein, were gels. After electrophoresis,
cells plus 50 ng of purified
BLZl(DE3)[pLysE;
grown
(0.5 mM IPTG). The
and streptavidin-conjugated
BLZl(DE3)[pLysE]
cells; 4, induced
an
were split and further
directly with Coomassie
filter. The transferred
at
attaining
directly in loading buffer. Samples
cells, containing about polyacrylamide on O.l?o SDS-15%
an lmmobilon
were grown
Upon
of the inducer
from the dissolved the proteins
BL21(DE3)[pLysE;
(as a control)
(c) DNA binding activity of rat HMGl produced in Escherichia coli The DNA binding properties of the material present in fraction III were compared to those of HMGl obtained from rat liver by the procedure of Marekov et al. (1984) and further purified by affinity chromatography on cruciform DNA-Sepharose (for details about this step of purification, see Bianchi et al., 1989). Both protein samples bound cruciform DNA (molecule C; Bianchi, 1988) with similar efliciency, but did not bind linear DNA (molecule B), or single-
-31.0
ar-
in E. coli, the open degradation
on the right margins
product, are in kDa.
- 21.5 lose equilibrated with buffer D-400 were added to the viscous lysate and stirred. This slurry was centrifuged for 3 h at 4°C in a Ti45 rotor at 45000 rpm. The supernatant (200 ml) was diluted with an equal volume of water and mixed with solid ammonium sulfate to a final concentration of 2.8 M. The resulting suspension was centrifuged at 4°C for 15 min in a Sorvall GSA rotor at 15 000 rpm. The supernatant (fraction I, containing about 50% of the intact HMGl originally present in the cell lysate) was filtered, applied to a Phenyl-Superose HR5/5 FPLC column and eluted with a 20-ml linear gradient of 2.8 M to 0 M
- 14.4
Fig. 3. Purification various
stages
of HMGI
of purification
produced were loaded
by E. co/i. Samples
acrylamide gel, electrophoresed, and silver-stained. BLZl(DE3)[pLysE; pT7-RNHMGl] cells dissolved buffer;
2, the supernatant
after ammonium
from the
on a 0.19,, SDS-15%
sulfate
Lanes: directly
poly-
1, induced in loading
precipitation
(frac-
tion 1); 3, the pool after fractionation on Phenyl-Superose (fraction II); 4, HMGI after fractionation on Ultrogel AcA54 (fraction III). Size markers
on the right margin
are in kDa.
274 stranded oligodeoxyribonucleotides (Fig. 4 and results not shown). Since all protein molecules freshly obtained after an affinity puri~cation step must be able to bind to their ligand, the result displayed in Fig. 4 implies that nearly loo”,, of the protein produced in E. coli and purified described in section h is active in DNA binding. (d) Conclusions Mammalian HMG 1 protein has been produced
as
in E. co/i
cells. This result could be obtained only by using the expression system that can be regulated most tightly, which is based on the absolute specificity of T7 RNA polymerase towards activity
its promoters and on the inhibition of its basal by T7 lysozyme. It is possible that even low
amounts of HMG 1 could be toxic to E. colicells by binding to its DNA.
I
Fig.4,
DN,4
I
I+l+l+
binding
activity
contained
mixtures
10 mM
linear DNA
of HMGI Hepes
produced
7.9:8”,, ~icoll~l5~ mM spermidineiO.5 mM mM
MgCQl nonidet-P40
EDTAIl mM and son&ted salmon
nonspecific
competitor.
“P-labeled
mM
by E. co/i. Assay
pH
DTT:O.O5”,,
NaCl/lO
1
DNA
cruciform
DNA
( 100 &ml) (molecule
as C;
Bianchi. 198X)or linear DNA (molecule B)wcrc added to a final conccntration of 0.1 !iM. HMG I protein purified from E. coli (fraction III) or from rat liver (including sepharosc)
an unity-puri~catioll
step on cruciform
wcrc mixed on ice to the assay mixtures
concentration assay mixtures
of 5 pgjml. After incubation acid/EDTA
on ice for 5 min, 6 ill of the
buffer. Electrophorcsis
HMGI-DNA
bands with lower mobility.
complexes.
I am grateful to Monica Beltrame and Vincenzo Notarianni, who participated in some preliminary parts of this work. I would like to thank Dr. Michael Stark and his collaborators at the University of Dundee (U.K.) for making available their pilot fcrmentor and their help. This work was supported by funds from Minister0 dell’Universit8 c della Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica of Italy. I was a recipient ofthe EMBO Short Term Fellowship ASTF 6410 while in Dundee.
DNA-
was performed
gel
when they are present,
REFERENCES
at
room temperature for 3 h at I? V/cm. The gel was then fixed in IO”,, acetic acid, dried and autoradiographed with Kodak XAR-S fitm at +O”C with intcnsifyi~~g screens. The lowermost band in each lane is free DNA: the fainter
suggest that the unmodified polypeptide chain of HMGl can bind to DNA and that the fraction of animal HMGl incapable of DNA binding is most probably covalently modified. An alternative explanation is that the available cDNA clone for rat HMG 1 codes for an alternative species of HMG 1, while a large part of cellular HMG 1 would be encoded by a different gene or allele. This interpretation is extremely unlikely since the sequence of the existing rat HMGI cDNA clone is completely homologous to HMGI cDNA clones from human and beef (Wen et al., 1989; Kaplan and Duncan, 1988). The purification procedure we report here is simple and fast, and requires materials which are all commercially available. We also applied it with success to the production of HMGl labeled with [ ““Slmethionine, which cannot be obtained easily from animal sources. We believe that the availability of a convenient source of ho~logeneous HMGl will be extremely valuable in the study of the physiological role of this protein, which is at present not clear.
to a final estimated
were loaded onto a 1 mm thick, 6.5”,, polyacrylamide
in 0.5 x Trisiboric
The yields obtainable from our HMGl expression strain are not extremely high, most probably due to the rapid degradation of the newly synthesized protein within the cells. However, such degradation problems are also encountered during the purification of HMG 1 from animal sources. The HMGI obtained from E. coli is not expected to contain any post-translational modi~cation, and is thercfore molecularly homogeneous. Its ~hromato~raphi~, electrophoretic and DNA binding properties are indistinguishable from those of HMG 1 purified from rat liver by means of affmity chromatography on cruciform DNA. These data
are
Bianchi, M.E.: Interaction of a protein from rat liver nuclei with cruciform DNA. EMBO J. 7 (19X8) 843-849. Bianchi,
M.E., Beltrame.
cruciform iOX-1059.
DNA
M. and Paonessa.
by nuclear
protein
G.: Specific HMGI.
recognition
Science
of
243 (1989)
Einck, L. and Bustin, the High Mobility
M.: The intracellular
distribution
Group
proteins.
chromosomal
and function
of
Exp. Cell. Res. 156
(1985) 295-310. Kaplan,
group
C.H.: Full length cDNA clone for bovine high
I (HMGI)
tions and comparison B&him. G., Frank,
liver HMGI
protein.
HMGl
Acids
Res.
16 (1988) of High condi-
with those of acid-extracted
Acta 78Y (1984) 63-68.
R. and Cortese, Nucleic
B.G.: Isolation
and HMG2 in nondenaturing
of their properties Biophys.
cDNA.
Nucleic
D.G. and Beltchev,
Mobility Group proteins
Paonessa,
Group
S.-C.: Carbohydrate
proteins.
modifications
Proc. Natl. Acad.
01
Sci. USA 78
Studier,
F.W. and Moffatt,
merase
to direct
B.A.: Use of bacteriophage
selective
high-level
expression
T7 RNA poly-
of cloned
genes. J.
Mol. Biol. 189 (1986) 113-130.
10375. Marekov, L.N., Demirov,
proteins.
D. and Chung,
the High Mobility (1981) 6704-670X.
D.J. and Duncan,
mobility
Reeves, R., Chang,
R.: Nucleotide
sequence
Acids Rcs. 15 (lY87) 9077.
for rat
Tabor, S. and Richardson, CC.: A bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerasei promoter system for controlled exclusive expression of specific genes. Proc. Nat]. Acad.
Sci. USA 82 (1985)
1074-1078.
Wen, L., Huang, J.-K., Johnson, B.H. and Reeck. G.R.: A human placental cDNA clone that encodes nonhistone chromosomal protein HMGI.
Nucleic
Acids Res. 17 (19XY) llY7-1214.