Vol. 75, No. 1, 1977
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIQPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
PROTEIN TURNOVER IN INTESTINAL
MUCOSAL VILLUS
AND CRYPT BRUSH BORDER MEMBRANES David Washington
University
St. Received
January
H. Alpers,
Louis,
M.D.
School
of Medicine
Missouri
63110
21,1977
SUMMARY. Relative turnover rates of intestinal brush border proteins havebeen studied by double labelled technique. Brush borders were isolated from cells at all levels along the villus, and from the crypts. Proteins with large molecular weight (950,000) demonstrated more rapid turnover compared with other brush border proteins at all levels along the villus. This rapid turnover was not seen in crypt brush borders. These findings support the concept of protein turnover in intestinal brush borders, and demonstrate differences between the proteins in rapidly growing crypt cells and non growing villus cells.
INTRODUCTION. membrane
The large
are
of the whole
degraded
and/or
membrane
(1).
can be accounted
for
95% pancreatectomy border the
in
brush
location. from
large
proteins
tease Finally, (lo-15
over
border
those
have
although hours)
action the
of protein
in villus
than
cells
of the
For this access brubk cell
border migration
0 1977 by Academic Press, Inc. of reproduction in any form reserved.
it
lower
It
cells
Crypt
and villus
in the
properties
as the
protein (24-36
the
turnover hours),
anatomical
membranes
clear
presumably along
However,
in their
is not
as well
since
among brush
in the crypt
(3).
that
turnover
(2).
tissue.
of course,
to happen,
to the
rapid
properties,
present
than
turnover
restores
and,
border
proteases,
differential
a homogenous
membranes,
faster
of pancreatic
feeding
not
brush
some of this
biochemical
in cells
rapidly.
should
is
intrinsic
The types
differ
turn
Copyright All rights
mucosa
differ
of their
by the
intestinal
at a rate
At least
and elastase
intestinal
of the
replaced
abolishes
proteins,
cells
proteins
whether
upper
villus
pancreatic entire
pro-
villus.
seems more rapid it
is
possible
130 ISSN
0006291
X
Vol. 75, No. 1, 1977
that
BIOCHEMICAL
migration
from crypt
accounts
for
labelled
technique.
the
lower
turnover
to villus
some of the
issues
we have
teins
in the rat
cell
(>270
intestine
obtained were
with
sacrificed
to allow
method
crypt
were
cells
were
markedly 7.
Thus,
fractions Brush
overnight
3H leucine
(30intestinal
isotopes
were Animals
Mass.).
before into
intestinal
pro-
14C leucine
Both
sacrifice
brush
is
border
mucosa
and adding pooled
crypt.
separation
borders
nine
membranes.
in the rat
This
fractions
of Weiser
(l),
washes
villus,
activity
as previously
of villus
fractions
des-
The collected
almost
Sucrase began
to
Cells
villus,
7 and 8 = upper
removed
propria.
tip
(5).
1 and 2 = upper
procedure
lamina kinase
from villus
wash of 15 minutes.
5 and 6 = lower
and thymidine
(7-10)
using
as follows:
the underlying
the
a tenth
sequentially
by the method
in 10 fractions
9 and 10 = lower from
for
prepared
EDTA washes
3 and 4 = mid villus,
cells
fasted
(Boston,
of label
these
of membrane
the entire
delay
half
in the mouse (4).
collected (5)
The 10 hour
outer
tip.
instances
Corp.
favor
To clarify
of u.1.
3.0 ml).
Nuclear
same in would
even in the
100 pc of 4,5
incorporation
base using
cribed
50 pc
the this
(160 gm) were
(about
has been validated
Intestinal
cells
fluid
at 9 AM.
villus,
to villus
In both
at 11 PM (1).
and confirmed
were
with
from New England
necessary This
rats
were
turnover
from crypt
tip
by the double
occurring.
relative
at 1 PM, and with
lumen was filled
upper
is
the
intrajejunally
50 Ci/mmole)
measured
of turnover
extrusion
investigated
mCi/mmole)
at the villus
on the membrane
MATERIAL AND METHODS. Wistar and injected
turnover
as in the
in situ
where
extrusion
the pattern
membranes
occurring
of the villus
protein
If
villus
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
to rise (l-6)
all
crypt,
epithelial
activity
fell
by fraction from crypt
was confirmed. were
prepared
from each group
131
of cells
according
Vol. 75, No. 1, 1977
BIOCHEMICAL
to the method borders
of Schmitz
as the
border
fraction
there
was less
pellet
final
(7).
derived
than
animals
was 1 mm thick
and used a tris
phoresis,
gel
blade
were
transferred
(New England England
holder.
Nuclear
Nuclear
37O.
Corp.,
The vials
2000
liquid
were
rejected.
reported
were
Recovery
for
all
control
later.
cells.
along
in the
After
with
wells
(New
overnight
in a Packard than
slice,
a multi-
3% Protosol
twice
was 70 - 80%.
each gel
using
0.4% Omnifluor
and incubated
less
slab
electro-
to four
containing
samples
into
On the other
found
The pattern
the villus,
with
proteins
(left
larger
experiments
simultaneously
The gel
5 mm pieces
and counted
each pooled
1% SDS and 1% 2-
corresponding
1 shows the results
from villus
occurring
for
and 320-
at Model
background
The data
was
and represent
the mean
experiments.
Figure
levels
into
Mass.)
of counts
of cells
electrophoresis.
wells
(8).
covered
chilled
pro-
3H counts
in
system
in toluene
for
by SDS gel
to application.
vials,
All
as 3H/14C ratios
RESULTS. proteins
then
for
from each group
boiled
and cut
Boston,
spectrometer.
of two separate
were
The pieces
Corp.)
and analyzed
successive
buffer
to counting
antL
The microvillus
940-1400
prior
was rinsed
in 1:he brush
250 pg.
to four
3 minutes
brush
the homogenate,
DNA.
separated
Samples
for
razor
with
containing
applied
of the villus.
ple
over
protein
then
protein
were
this
fold
was about
were
pg of membrane
mercaptoethanol
11-13
unfragmented
activity
in 0.2 ml of buffer
proteins
580 l4 C counts
the
Sucrase
of membrane
three
Membrane
using
3% contamination
The yield
fraction
(6),
was increased
from
Fifty
et al.
preparation.
was resuspended
tein
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCV COMM’w’r\“CATIO”\‘S
were the
performed jejunum
hand,
the
in the brush of turnover
the most rapid side
by injecting and sacrificing
proteins
132
border
was similar turnover
of each gel'). both
isotopes
the animals
of the crypt
The
cell
10 hours brush
Vol. 75, No. 1, 1977
BIOCHEMICAL
I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DISTANCE FROM ORIGIN (cm1
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
II
I 2 3 4 5 6 DISTANCE FROM
7 8 9 10 1, ORIGIN (cm)
Figure 1. Relative turnover of membrane proteins along the villus. The dot and lines on the right of the graph refer to the mean _+ 1 standard error of the mean for an experiment in which both isotopes, 3H and 14C, were administered to the animal simultaneously. The vertical lines at the bottom of the graph depict the Coomassie blue stain of a fixed and unsliced gel of membrane proteins run simultaneously. These patterns were rather similar at all three levels of the villus. Figure crypt.
border
2. Relative Symbols are
(Figure
2) showed
the variation standard both though crypt were
amino
no differences
acids
origin,
administered
weight
large did
not
of similar
differ
proteins brush
proteins,
size
were
the relatively
133
since
in which
simultaneously. not
borders,
in villus
whatever,
experiment
(MW >150,000),
display
intestinal
from the mean + one
of a control
were
in the 1.
in turnover
not
in the villus
These
in proteins
on right)
molecular
were
present.
cm from the found
(shown
the large as they
of membrane proteins to those in Figure
in 3H/14C rat' 10 did
error
labelled
turnover identical
cells.
Al-
so abundant
large
in
proteins migrating
l-3
rapid
turnover
It
is unlikely,
Vol. 75, No. 1, 1977
however,
BIOCHEMICAL
that
identical,
the
large
since
of large
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
proteins
of crypt
many enzyme activities
size
are
a unique
and villus
cells
corresponding
property
are
to proteins
of the mature
villus
cell
membrane. DISCUSSION.
During
the
of the experiment, into
the
This
cells
lumen whereas
difference
might
those
from
the
lower
turnover
as those
from
villus
would
fasting
to tip
is
takes
24-36
hours,
cell
during
for
the
border
Thus,
cell
found. the
the double
and transit
loss.
one might is not
this
First,
seems unlikely
by this
experiment
and be extruded
difference
Since
it
protein
large
show the same rapid
10 hours,
migration,
the
do not.
villus.
only
migrate
two reasons.
brush
be much affected
decreases
of migration
for
the upper
of the experiment base
to account
villus
labelled
might
in the crypt
seems unlikely
proteins
villus
of the double
on the villus
be thought
explanation
part
10 hours
labelled
time that
the
Second,
assume that so rapid
from lower
since the rate
as measured
in
fed animals. These in the over
data
support
luminal
membranes
is related
to the
suggest
that
villus
these
as well
that
the concept
levels
along
the villus.
level
of brush
border
synthesis The lack
dividing
crypt
actions
proteins This enzymes
of turnover cells
E. Coli
in logarithmic
and the
level
depends
may relate phase
turnover
If
some of this
to cells
The present
along
cells
shows a low
134
maintains (9)
demonstrate at all a constant
despite
the
found
in the
obtained
from
level
of protein
of growth
lower
con-
(3).
of turnover)
to data
of the
occurring
the villus
low rate
the rate
thus
turn-
the data
findings
is a phenomenon mechanism
occurs
proteases,
available
by villus (or
upon
cells.
villus.
of protein
protein
of pancreatic are
as the upper of large
tinued
of villus
proteases
turnover
that
(lo),
bacteria.
with
catabolism, degradation
Vol. 75, No. 1, 1977
BIOCHEMICAL
increasing
as growth
slows.
comparable
to villus
cells,
further. brush
It
is not
borders
itself
is
surface
of the
heterogeneity
would for
crypt
villus
leaving cells
from This
AM07130
work
proteases that
border
proteins
the mucosal
cell
of the membrane
seen in the crypt
during
of crypt
is clear
the double
increases
the
brush
seen border.
labelled
It
technique
cells
the process
to the
on the villus,
of scraping
the
wall.
was supported
from the National
to Ms. Pam Helms for
it
of brush
to use only behind
turnover
of pancreatic
when using
cells
slow
phase,
breakdown
properties
However,
is not
mucosa,
the muscle
the
intrinsic
rates
the stationary
of protein
whether
cell.
cells
the crypt
enter
of availability
seem reasonable, intestinal
the rate
due to the
in turnover
in mature
When cells
certain
or to the lack
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
in part Institutes
secretarial
by Grants of Health.
AM 14038
and
I am grateful
assistance.
REFERENCES 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10.
Alpers, D.H. (1972) J. Clin. Invest. 51, 2621-2630. Alpers, D.H. and Tedesco, F.J. (1975) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 401, 28-40. Alpers, D.H. (1972) J. Clin. Invest. 51, 167-173. Billington, T. and Nayudu, P.R.V. (1976) J. Memb. Biol. 27, 83-100. Weiser, M.M. (1973) J. Biol, Chem. 248, 2536-2541. Schmitz, J., Preises, H., Maestracci, D., Ghosh, B.K., Cerde, (1973) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 323, 9% J.J. and Crane, R.K. 112. Lowry, O.H., Rosebrough, N.J., Farr, A.L., and Randall, R.J. (1951) J. Biol. Chem. 193, 265-275. Neville, D.M. (1971) J. Biol. Chem. 246, 6328-6334. Nordstrom, C., Dahlqvist, A., Josefsson, L. (1968) J. Histochem. Cytochem. 15, 713-721. Goldberg, A.L., Howell, E.M., Li, J.B., Martel, S.B., and Prouty, W.F. (1974) Fed. Proc. 33, 1112-1120.
135