Vol. 186, No. 2, 1992

BIOCHEMICAL

AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

July 31, 1992

Pages 790-795

REGULATION

OF l’HOSPHOINOSITIDE BY SPHINGOSINE

HYDROLYSIS IN CULTURED AND PSYCHOSINE

ASTROCYTES

Terry Ritchie, Abraham Rosenberg, and Ernest P. Noble Alcohol Research Center, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Brain Research Institute University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024-1759 Received

June

8,

Sciences

1992

SUMMARY: The effects of sphingosine and psychosine on phosphoinositide hydrolysis in primary cultured astrocytes were determined. Exposure to sphingosine produced a dose-dependent stimulation of’ phosphoinositide hydrolysis requiring the presence of external Ca++ for optimal activity. The addition of 10 pM norepinephrine resulted in a stimulation additional to that with sphingosine. The al-antagonist prazosin completely inhibited norepinephrine-induced phosphoinositide hydrolysis but had no effect on that produced by sphingosine. Psychosine (108 PM), when co-incubated with sphingosine, produced complete inhibition of sphingosine-induced phosphoinositide hydrolysis at all doses of sphingosine tested (33-668 FM). Likewise, psychosine totally inhibited norepinephrineinduced phosphoinositide hydrolysis. The protein kinase C inhibitor staurosporine (1 PM) had no effect on sphingosine-induced phosphoinositide hydrolysis. These findings suggest that lysosphingolipids such as sphingosine and psychosine may play an important role in the regulation of phosphoinositide turnover in astrocytes by a mechanism dependent on extracellular Caf+ and independent of the al-adrenergic receptor and protein kinase C. o 1s~ ~~~~~~~~ press, I”~.

The agonist-induced generating

breakdown

diacylglycerol

(l-3).

Inositol

of Ca++ while diacylglycerol potent inhibitors

of PKC activation

(4,5). Sphingosine

the action of activators

have been attributed

It has thus been hypothesized of PKC activity providing

(PI) second messenger system. However, related

lysosphingolipids

of intracellular

stores

Recent investigations

and phorbol may function

mechanism

esters.

Most of the cellular

as an endogenous

of PKC negative

for one branch of the phosphoinositide

the full range of physiological

has not yet been determined.

into to be

of PKC by competitively

to a direct consequence of its inhibition

that sphingosine a regulatory

and

and related lysosphingolipids

blocks the activation

such as diacylglycerol

C functions as a signal 1,4,5+isphosphate

in the mobilization

this system have shown sphingosine

responses elicited by sphingosine modulator

functions

inositol

is a key activator of protein kinase C (PKC).

regulating

(4,5).

by phospholipase

of two second messengers,

1,4,5-trisphosphate

the mechanisms inhibiting

of phosphoinositides

system via the production

activities of sphingosine

Some activities

of sphingosine

and

such as

Abbreviations used: DMEM, Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium; G protein, guanine nucleotide binding PBS, phosphate buffered saline; PKC, protein kinase C; PI, protein; NE, norepinephrine; phosphoinositide. 0006-291X/92

Copyright All rights

$4.00

0 1992 by Academic Press, Inc. of reproduction in any form reserved.

790

Vol.

BIOCHEMICAL

186. No. 2, 1992

inhibition

of thyrotropin

releasing

hormone

AND BlOPHYStCAL

binding

to pituitary

receptor tyrosine kinase activity (7) may occur independently

RESEARCH COMMUNlCATlONS

cells (6) and activation

of PKC. Herein, we describe the potent

stimulation

of PI hydrolysis by sphingosine

by a mechanism that occurs independently

is inhibited

by the endogenous

analog psychosine (galactosylsphingosine).

sphingosine

of the EGF

of PKC and that

METHODS Primary cultures of astrocytes were prepared from the brains of I-Z-day-old rat pups essentially as described by McCarthy and de Vellis (B), with the exception that a mechanical rather than an enzymatic dissociation of cells was used. For the experiments, astrocytes were seeded in 24well plates at a density of 1.5 X 105 cells per well and maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) containing 10% fetal bovine serum. These cultures were used for the PI hydrolysis assays within 7-10 days. The stimulated hydrolysis of PI’s was measured by a modification of the procedure of Berridge et al. (9) as previously described (IO). Cells in 24-well plates were incubated overnight with 0.5 ml of DMEM containing 1 @Zi of [3H]myo-inositol per well to prelabel membrane PI’s. The cells were washed twice with 1 ml of Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline (PBS) followed by the addition of 0.5 ml of salt dissolved in water, PBS containing 4.5 g/l glucose. Sphingosine, prepared as the hydrochloride was then added to the desired concentration to specific wells and the 24-well plates were shaken on a rotary shaker for 5 min followed by incubation at 23’C for 1 hr. The cells were then washed twice with 1 ml of PBS per wash. In experiments where the effects of psychosine were evaluated, cells were treated likewise with psychosine. The cells were then preincubated for 15 min at 37oC with 0.5 ml of PBS containing 10 mM LiCl and specific substances to be tested. At the end of this period, the preincubation buffer was removed and the reaction was initiated by the addition of 0.5 ml of substances to be tested in PBS containing 4.5 g/l glucose and 10 mM LiCl. After an incubation period of 30 min at 37oC, the reaction was terminated by the addition of 1 ml of ice-cold absolute methanol to each well. The cells were then scraped and the entire contents of each well were transferred to polypropylene tubes containing 0.4 ml water and 1 ml chloroform. The samples were thoroughly vortexed and centrifuged at 500 x g for 5 min to separate the aqueous and chloroform phases. A 1.5 ml aliquot of the upper aqueous phase was applied to a mini-column containing Bio-Rad AGl-X8 resin (formate form) for each sample. Free [3H]inositol and [3H]glycerophosphoinositol were washed through the columns with 5 ml of buffer containing 5 mM sodium borate and 60 mM sodium formate. The [3H]inositol phosphates were then eluted for counting with 3 ml of buffer containing 1.0 M ammonium formate and 0.1 M formic acid. A 0.5 ml aliquot from the chloroform layer from each sample was counted for radioactivity to determine the amount of [‘Hlinositol incorporated into lipids. The radioactivity of all samples was measured by liquid scintillation counting. PI hydrolysis is based on the amount of [3H]inositol phosphates formed and is expressed as the percentage of total [3H]inositol incorporated into lipids (dpm ammonium formate fraction + dpm chloroform fraction) converted into [3H]inositol phosphates. In experiments assessing the effect of the PKC inhibitor staurosporine, cells were preincubated for 15 min at 37’C with 1 FM staurosporine prior to the addition of sphingosine. All subsequent incubations throughout the assay contained staurosporine at this concentration.

RESULTS Exposure to sphingosine stimulation

of PI hydrolysis (Fig. IA).

to psychosine, an inhibition concentration inhibition

of astrocytes prelabeled

with [3H]inositol

When cells exposed to sphingosine

of sphingosine-induced

were simultaneously

exposed

PI hydrolysis occurred that was dependent

of psychosine (Fig. 1B). Psychosine, at a concentration

of sphingosine-induced

produced a dose-dependent

PI hydrolysis at all concentrations

of 108 PM, produced

of sphingosine

on the a potent

tested (33-668 PM)

(Fig. 1A). In previous studies, we have found that PI hydrolysis in primary cultured ashocytes occurred primarily

by stimulation

of the al-adrenergic

that induced by exposure to sphingosine

receptor (10,111. As with NE-stimulated

PI hydrolysis,

requires the presence of external Ca++ for optimal 791

activity, as

Vol.

BIOCHEMICAL

186, No. 2, 1992

AND BIOPHYSICAL

60

RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

-

45 m 0

0 pM Psychosine 108 @A Psychosine

A

50

m 0

40

T

84 uM Sphingosine 0 uM Sphingosine

35

40

30 25

30 20 20

15 10

10 5 0

0

33

84

167

Sphingosine

250

334

Concentration

0

666

0

(PM)

22

54

Psychosine

108

162

Concentration

216

(@A)

Fie. Effects of sphingosine and psychosine on PI hydrolysis in cultured astrocytes. (A) Astrocytes prelabeled with 13H]inositol were exposed to various concentrations of sphingosine with or without the addition of 108 pM psychosine. (B) Astrocytes prelabeled with [3Hlinositol were exposed to 84 nM sphingosine with or without the addition of various concentrations of psychosine. For both (A) and (8) the accumulation of 13H1inositol phospates was subsequently determined as described in METHODS. Values are the mean + SEM for a typical experiment. Similar results were obtained in at least three other experiments for both (A) and (B).

evidenced by a reduction

in the accumulation

of [ 3H]inositol

phosphates in the presence of 1 mM EGTA

(0 mM Ca++) versus that obtained with 0.9 mM external Ca++(TabIe Fig. 2A shows the additive combination.

PI hydrolysis

When astrocytes exposed to 84 ~Msphingosine

the accumulation

of [3H1inositol

phosphates

induced by either substance alone. producing

effect of stimulated

a maximal stimulation

1).

was additive

by sphingosine

were further stimulated with

the stimulation

When cells were exposed to 334 pM sphingosine,

a concentration

of PI hydrolysis,

when

compared

and NE in

with 10 pM NE,

10 pM NE failed to produce any further stimulation

(data not shown).

Table 1. Effect of extracellular Ca++ on phosphoinositide hydrolysis in cultured astrocytes 13HlInositol Phosphates (% 13H]PI’s Converted) 1 mM ECTA (0 n-&i Ca++) + 10 pM Norepinephrine 1 mM ECTA (0 mM Ca++) + 167 PM Sphingosine

12.45 25.35 24.23

0.9 mM

18.54 k 0.21

1 mM EGTA (0 mM Ca++)

Ca++

0.9 n&l Ca++ + 10 pM Norepinephrine 0.9 mM Caf++ 167 UM Suhingosine

39.73 37.32

f 0.28 + 2.43 + 1.26

+ 0.56 + 0.62

Ashocytes prelabeled with 13HJinositol were exposed to vehicle or 167 nM sphingosine as described in METHODS. The accumulation of [3H]inositol phos hates was measured after stimulation with the indicated typical

substances

in medium

containing

0 mM Ca +r or 0.9 n-M Ca*.

Values are the mean f SEM for a

experiment. Similar results were obtained in three other experiments. 792

Vol.

BIOCHEMICAL

186, No. 2, 1992 60

AND BIOPHYSICAL

r

RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

60

B1

m Control

50

0 [z9

50

10 pM Prazosin 108 pk.4 Psychosine

40

30

20

10

Control

10 jdA NE

84 1Jn sphingodnb

0

10 /AM NE + 84 /LM sphingosins

L

Control

10 /AM NE

334 pM sphingosine

F&& Comparison of NE- and sphingosine-stimulated PI hydrolysis in cultured astrocytes. (A) Additive effect of NE and sphingosine on PI hydrolysis. (B) Effects of prazosin and psychosine on NEand sphingosine-stimulated PI hydrolysis. Astrocytes prelabeled with 13Hlinositol were exposed to the indicated amounts of sphingosine as described in METHODS. The accumulation of [3H]inositol phosphates was measured after stimulation with the indicated substances. Values are the mean * SEM for a typical experiment. For both (A) and (B) similar results were obtained with at least one other exoeriment.

To determine receptor,

the effect

prazosin

was

accumulation sphingosine

whether

sphingosine

of the al-adrenergic

found

to completely

of ]3H]inositoI is exerting

inhibit

phosphates

its effects

inhibition

whether

induced

PI hydrolysis

inhibition

stimulated

PI hydrolysis

determined

(Table 2). Staurosporine,

than

to inhibiting

of NE-stimulated

To investigate

be inducing inhibitor

observed,

PI hydrolysis

prazosin

NE-stimulated

at a site other

effect of psychosine which, in addition complete

may receptor

PI hydrolysis,

the adrenergic

receptor.

sphingosine-induced

of PKC by sphingosine

may

the effect of the potent

on Phosphoinositide

15 min Similar

prelabeted prior results

with

13H]inositol

were incubated

of sphingosine. Values in a second experiment.

793

with vehicle are

While

no effect

on the

suggesting

This

contrasts

that

with

the

the

indirectly

the

mean

be responsible

in Cultured

(control) f SEM

for the

staurosporine

with sphingosine,

14.01 15.29 52.21 58.92

+ 1 pM Staurosporine

to the addition were obtained

2B).

PI hydrolysis, produced

PKC inhibitor

Hydrolysis

PBS ControI

Astrocytes

al-adrenergic

2B).

13HlInositol f% 13HlPl’s

1 FM Staurosporine 334 uM Sphingosine 334 uM Sphingosine

it had

to sphingosine

(Fig.

the

(Fig.

by exposure

both alone and in combination

Table 2. Effect of Staurosporine

via

was determined

was

was found to

Astrocytes

Phosphates Converted) f f +_ k

0.41 0.87 0.59 1.29

or 1 uM staurosporine for

a single

experiment.

for

Vol.

BIOCHEMICAL

186, No. 2, 1992

have no effect on PI hydrolysis, any bearing on the stimulation

indicating

AND RIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

that in cultured

astrocytes the activity of PKC has little if

of PI hydrolysis by sphingosine.

DISCUSSION While

most investigations

lysosphingolipids inhibition

delving

have generally

shown

into the biological

astrocytes by sphingosine

Recent evidence indicating

the stimulation

via a mechanism

of PKC by sphingosine

hydrolysis observed.

the inability

been reported

However,

in this study would

with rat parotid

Psychosine hydrolysis.

of a major second messenger system in

that is not dependent

on the activity of PKC.

proved

to inhibit

of the PKC inhibitor

acinar cells where sphingosine

in astrocytes

staurosporine

stimulated

psychosine’s relationship

Similar

results have

the accumulation

of inositol

of PKC activity (17).

to be a potent

acted similarly

to sphingosine

PI

to produce any effect

antagonist

to sphingosine-stimulated

This contrasts with findings from a previous study where both sphingosine

as well as other lysosphingolipids,

PI hydrolysis

as a plausible mechanism for the stimulated

indicate that PKC is likely not involved.

phosphates by a mechanism also independent

and other

a result of sphingosine’s

that PKC may function in a feedback mechanism

(12-16) would suggest inhibition on PI hydrolysis

of sphingosine

these responses to be primarily

of PKC, this study has demonstrated

cultured

activities

PI

and psychosine,

in producing

a strong inhibition

PI hydrolysis

is quite different from that with PKC

regarding

of PKC (18). Thus

activity. The precise mechanism by which sphingosine unclear.

The failure of the al-adrenergic

PI hydrolysis

and psychosine affect PI hydrolysis

receptor antagonist prazosin to inhibit

suggests that sphingosine’s

site of action is different

liver have found that a major portion of the free sphingosine (19) where it could interact with various membrane alter the physical properties the observation combination

with

NE-stimulated

from that of NE. Studies with rat

is associated with the plasma membrane

components.

While sphingolipids

did not enhance NE-stimulated

NE suggests

PI hydrolysis

otherwise.

The potent

that omission

It is possible

and

for extracellular

in light of evidence

can attenuate and even in some cases

with appropriate

of sphingosine-stimulated

G proteins.

activity

and psychosine

was competitive

binding

of PI hydrolysis

exert their actions on PI hydrolysis whether

in nature, analog

this enzyme may account 794

nucleotide

stimulation

It is also possible that sphingosine

by such a close structural with

of specific guanine

C. While it was not determined

PI hydrolysis

interaction

the involvement

receptor activation.

mechanism for receptor-mediated

that sphingosine

interact directly with phospholipase sphingosine-induced

by the requirement

This is not surprising

medium

at a site distal to membrane

Recent evidence has demonstrated

agonist-antagonist

of both sphingosine-

inositol lipid turnover in the brain (20-22). Thus, it seems likely that sphingosine

proteins (G proteins) in the transduction interaction

PI hydrolysis.

of Ca ++ from the incubation

is acting to stimulate PI hydrolysis

(23-26).

of receptor activity,

by psychosine indicates that activity induced by both substances occurs

Ca++ by both NE- and sphingosine-stimulated abolish stimulated

may serve to

activity but instead was additive in

inhibition

through a common mechanism of action. This is further supported showing

sphingosine-induced

of regions of membrane and thus serve as modulators

that sphingosine

is at present

and psychosine

via may

psychosine antagonism

the strong inhibition

suggests the possibility for the observed

results.

of the that an Such a

Vol.

186,

possibility with

No.

BIOCHEMICAL

2, 1992

is strengthened

the failure

by the inhibition

of the al-adrenergic

AND

BIOPHYSICAL

of NE-stimulated receptor

antagonist

RESEARCH

PI hydrolysis prazosin

COMMUNICATIONS

by psychosine

coupled

to affect stimulation

of PI

hydrolysis by sphingosine. The finding affect PI hydrolysis activities,

in particular

physiologically. higher

that endogenous

baseline levels of inositol modulating

showing

suggests

phosphate

the

that

that

turnover.

and diacylglycerol its stimulation

function

by tonically

may function regulating

the

second messengers as well as maintaining

by diacylglycerol.

They may subsequently

activity of these systems in response to stimulation

The full physiological

has other cellular

these substances

substances and could very well act as second messengers themselves sphingolipid

and psychosine severely

sphingosine

and psychosine used in this study are likely much

levels, these substances still may

resting activity of PKC by regulating in

such as sphingosine

that of PKC inhibition,

While the amounts of sphingosine

than physiological

important

lysosphingolipids

coupled with previous investigations

significance

psychosine should become much clearer when their regulation

as a result of alterations

of the activities

be

by other bioactive of sphingosine

in and

at the cellular level is better known.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We wish to thank Ruth Cole for the technical assistance in the preparation of the astrocyte cultures used in this investigation. This work was supported in part by the Pike Professorship for Alcohol Studies (EPN) and USPHS grant AA 07653.

REFERENCES 1. Berridge, M.J., and Irvine, R.E (1984) Nature 312,315321. 2. Majerus, P W., Connolly, T.M., Deckmyn, H., Ross, T.S., Boss, T.E., Ishii, H., Bansal, VS., and Wilson, O.B. (1986) Science 234, 1519-1526. 3. Nishizuka, LJ. (1984) Science 225, 1365-1370. 4. Hannum, Y.A., and Bell, R.M. (1989) Science 243,500-507. 5. Merrill, A.H. (1991) J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 23,83-104. 6. Winicov, I., and Gershengom, M. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263,12179-12182. 7. Davis, R., Girones, N., and Faucher, M. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263,5373-5379. 8. McCarthy, K.D., and de Vellis, J. (1980) J. Cell. Biol. 85, 890-902. 9. Berridge, M.J., Downes, C.P., and Hanley, M.R. (1982) Biochem. J. 206,587-595. 10. Ritchie, T., Kim, H.-S., Cole, R., de Vellis, J., and Noble, E.P. (1988) Alcohol 5, 183-187. 11. Ritchie, T., Cole, R., Kim, H.-S., de Vellis, J., and Noble, E.P. (1987) Life Sci. 41, 31-39. 12. Orellana, S.A., Solski, EA., and Brown, J.H. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 260,5236-5239. 13. Orellana, S., Solski, P.A., and Brown, J.H. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262,1638-1643. 14. Pearce, B., Morrow, C., and Murphy, S. (1988) J. Neurochem. 50,936-944. 15. Ryu, S.H., Kim, U.-H., Wahl, M.I., Brown, A.B., Carpenter, G., Huang, K.-P., and Rhee, S.G. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265,17941-17945. 16. Vincentini, L.M., Di Virgilio, F., Ambrosini, A., Pozzan, T, and Meldolesi, J. (1985) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Con-m. 127,310-317. 17. Sugiya, H., and Furuyama, S. (1990) Cell Calcium 11,469475. 18. Hannum, Y.A., and Bell, R.M. (1987) Science 235, 670-674. 19. Slife, C.W., Wang, E., Hunter, R., Wang, S., Burgess, C., Liotta, D.C., and Merrill, A.H. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 10371-10377. 20. Pearce, B., Cambray-Deakin, M., Morrow, C., Grimble, J., and Murphy, S., (1985) J. Neurochem. 45, 15X-1540. 21. Griffin, H.D., Hawthorne, J.N., and Sykes, M. (1979) Biochem. Pharmacol. 28, 1143-1147. 22. Gonzales, R.A., and Crews, ET. (1984) J. Neurosci. 4,3120-3127. 23. Litosch, I., Wallis, C., and Fain, J.N. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 260,5464-5471. 24. Uhing, R.J., Prpic, V., Jiang, H., and Exton, J.H. (1986) J. I)iol. Chem. 261, 2140-2146. 25. Straub, R.E., and Gershengorn, M.C. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261,2712-2717. 26. Hepler, J.R., and Harden, T.K. (1986) Biochem. J. 239,141-146. 795

Regulation of phosphoinositide hydrolysis in cultured astrocytes by sphingosine and psychosine.

The effects of sphingosine and psychosine on phosphoinositide hydrolysis in primary cultured astrocytes were determined. Exposure to sphingosine produ...
471KB Sizes 0 Downloads 0 Views

Recommend Documents