Indian J Surg (December 2015) 77(Suppl 3):S1326–S1333 DOI 10.1007/s12262-014-1170-y
REVIEW ARTICLE
Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy vs. Open Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Xiu-wu Pan & Xin-ming Cui & Jing-fei Teng & Dong-xu Zhang & Zhi-jun Wang & Fa-jun Qu & Yi Gao & Xin-gang Cui & Dan-feng Xu
Received: 13 March 2014 / Accepted: 11 September 2014 / Published online: 24 September 2014 # Association of Surgeons of India 2014
Abstract Open retropubic radical prostatectomy (ORP) remains the “gold standard” for surgical treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa). Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is a robotic surgery used worldwide. The aim of this study is to collect the data available in the literature on RARP and ORP, and further evaluate the overall safety and efficacy of RARP vs. ORP for the treatment of clinically localized PCa. A literature search was performed using electronic databases between January 2009 and October 2013. Clinical data such as operation duration, transfusion rate, positive surgical margins (PSM), nerve sparing, 3- and 12-month urinary continence, and potency were pooled to carry out metaanalysis. Six studies were enrolled for this meta-analysis. The operation duration of RARP group was longer than that of ORP group (weighted mean difference=64.84). There was no statistically significant difference in the transfusion rate, PSM rate, and between RARP and ORP (transfusion rate, OR=0.30; PSM rate, OR=0.94). No significant difference was seen in 3and 12-month urinary continence recovery (3 months, OR=
1.32; 12 months, OR=1.30). There was a statistically significant difference in potency between the 3- and 12-month groups (3 months, OR=2.80; 12 months, OR=1.70). RARP is a safe and feasible surgical technique for the treatment of clinically localized PCa owing to the advantages of fewer perioperative complications and quicker patency recovery. Keywords Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy . Open retropubic radical prostatectomy . Prostate cancer Abbreviations PCa Prostate cancer RP Radical prostatectomy ORP Open retropubic radical prostatectomy RRP Retropubic radical prostatectomy RARP Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy RALP Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy PSA Prostate-specific antigen NOS Newcastle–Ottawa Scale
Xiu-wu Pan and Xin-ming Cui contributed equally to this work. X.
REVIEW ARTICLE
Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy vs. Open Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Xiu-wu Pan & Xin-ming Cui & Jing-fei Teng & Dong-xu Zhang & Zhi-jun Wang & Fa-jun Qu & Yi Gao & Xin-gang Cui & Dan-feng Xu
Received: 13 March 2014 / Accepted: 11 September 2014 / Published online: 24 September 2014 # Association of Surgeons of India 2014
Abstract Open retropubic radical prostatectomy (ORP) remains the “gold standard” for surgical treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa). Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is a robotic surgery used worldwide. The aim of this study is to collect the data available in the literature on RARP and ORP, and further evaluate the overall safety and efficacy of RARP vs. ORP for the treatment of clinically localized PCa. A literature search was performed using electronic databases between January 2009 and October 2013. Clinical data such as operation duration, transfusion rate, positive surgical margins (PSM), nerve sparing, 3- and 12-month urinary continence, and potency were pooled to carry out metaanalysis. Six studies were enrolled for this meta-analysis. The operation duration of RARP group was longer than that of ORP group (weighted mean difference=64.84). There was no statistically significant difference in the transfusion rate, PSM rate, and between RARP and ORP (transfusion rate, OR=0.30; PSM rate, OR=0.94). No significant difference was seen in 3and 12-month urinary continence recovery (3 months, OR=
1.32; 12 months, OR=1.30). There was a statistically significant difference in potency between the 3- and 12-month groups (3 months, OR=2.80; 12 months, OR=1.70). RARP is a safe and feasible surgical technique for the treatment of clinically localized PCa owing to the advantages of fewer perioperative complications and quicker patency recovery. Keywords Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy . Open retropubic radical prostatectomy . Prostate cancer Abbreviations PCa Prostate cancer RP Radical prostatectomy ORP Open retropubic radical prostatectomy RRP Retropubic radical prostatectomy RARP Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy RALP Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy PSA Prostate-specific antigen NOS Newcastle–Ottawa Scale
Xiu-wu Pan and Xin-ming Cui contributed equally to this work. X.
