Social cognition as an RDoC domain.

HHS Public Access Author manuscript Author Manuscript

Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 January 01. Published in final edited form as:

Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2016 January ; 171(1): 132–141. doi:10.1002/ajmg.b.32394.

Social Cognition as an RDoC Domain Ruben C. Gur1 and Raquel E. Gur1 1Brain

Behavior Laboratory, Neuropsychiatry Section, Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Abstract Author Manuscript Author Manuscript

While the bulk of research into neural substrates of behavior and psychopathology has focused on cognitive, memory and executive functions, there has been a recent surge of interest in emotion processing and social cognition, manifested in designating Social Cognition as a major RDoC domain. We describe the origins of this field’s influence on cognitive neuroscience and highlight the most salient findings leading to the characterization of the “social brain” and the establishments of parameters that quantify normative and aberrant behaviors. Such parameters of behavior and neurobiology are required for a potentially successful RDoC construct, especially if heritability is established, because of the need to link with genomic systems. We proceed to illustrate how a social cognition measure can be used within the RDoC framework by presenting a task of facial emotion identification. We show that performance is sensitive to normative individual differences related to age and sex and to deficits associated with schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders. Neuroimaging studies with this task demonstrate that it recruits limbic and frontal regulatory activation in healthy samples as well as abnormalities in psychiatric populations. Evidence for its heritability was documented in genomic family studies and in patients with the 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Measures that meet such criteria can help build translational bridges between cellular molecular mechanisms and behavior that elucidate aberrations related to psychopathology. Such links will transcend current diagnostic classifications and ultimately lead to a mechanistically based diagnostic nomenclature. Establishing such bridges will provide the elements necessary for early detection and scientifically grounded intervention.

Keywords facial emotion identification; heritability; amygdala; psychosis

Author Manuscript

The domain of social cognition The field of social cognition has seen a rapid growth reflected in over 19,000 publications listed in pubmed on that topic, nearly half (8534) in the past 5 years and 457 in 2015 alone, and the year is not half through (retrieving the term “social cognition” from http:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed on April 21, 2015). Studies range from basic research, including animal models and basic human studies, to clinical investigations, which indicate

Corresponding author: Ruben C. Gur, Ph.D., Brain Behavior Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce, Philadelphia PA, USA. Tel.:215 615 3604, fax: 215 662 7903. [email protected].

Gur and Gur

Page 2

Author Manuscript

the translational potential of the construct. It will obviously be beyond our scope to review this literature. Rather, we will outline the general progression of this work, focusing on findings relevant to the RDoC mission of elucidating psychopathology through dimensionally characterized behavioral domains.

Author Manuscript

In the broader context of psychology, Social Cognition has been a topic of study by social psychologists (e.g. Fiske and Taylor, 1991), and some concepts and paradigms have been productively adapted to clinical psychology, especially in relation to schizophrenia (see review in Penn, Sanna & Roberts, 2008 and chapters in Roberts & Penn, 2012). Within cognitive neuroscience, social cognition has been defined narrowly and broadly. The narrow definition considers social cognition as a branch of cognitive psychology originating from the work of Neal Miller and Albert Bandura, who highlighted the role of modeling and motivation in learning. A broader definition considers the domain of social cognition to encompass behavior related to contact with the context of other conspecifics, and some would argue that other species should be included in the human’s social environment. The field itself, as is usually the case, did not much consider definitional constraints. Studies include work on fear conditioning in rodents, affect discrimination in faces and voices in various clinical populations, measures of “empathy” and of “implicit bias”, and functional neuroimaging studies during activation with socially relevant stimuli ranging from faces to voices to moral dilemmas to simulated computer games (cyberball exclusion manipulation). The field reflects an intersection of cognitive neuroscience with “affective neuroscience”, and is characterized by convergence of data from animal to basic human to clinical studies, with neuroimaging as a major translational tool. The impact of this work spans clinical neuroscience, economics, social policy and the legal system (Adolphs, 1999; Cacioppo, 2014; Park et al., 2011; Penn, Sanna & Roberts, 2008).

Author Manuscript

Relation to affective neuroscience While the main focus of linking behavior to brain function has been on “cold” cognition, and more specifically on language and memory, a more minor stream of evidence has accumulated about the “social” brain. Two influential investigators have called attention to effects of lesions on social behavior and emotion processing. Babinski (1914) reported on a series of cases with moderate to severe brain damage who either denied the existence of symptoms (“anosognosie”) or even were oddly happy, optimistic and jocular (“anosodysaphorie”). These patients had lesions in the right hemisphere. Babinski’s contemporary, Hughlings-Jackson (1932), noticed the relatively intact social functioning of aphasic patients with left hemispheric lesions, concluding that it is the right hemisphere that regulates social cognition.

Author Manuscript

This methodology of clinical pathological associations has generated further evidence on neural substrates of social cognition related to hemispheric specialization. Most notable for case reports were the documentation of prosodic disturbance associated with right hemispheric lesion (Ross and Mesulam 1979), and of deteriorating social functioning in a case of right frontal damage in a railroad worker (Damasio et al. 1994). Aggregate case reports by Gainotti (1972) noted dysphoria and anti-social behavior with left hemispheric lesions, and jocularity and euphoria with right hemispheric lesions. Sackeim et al. (1982)

Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 January 01.

Gur and Gur

Page 3

Author Manuscript Author Manuscript

reported retrospective studies of 119 cases of pathological laughing and crying associated with destructive lesions. Pathological laughing was associated with right-sided damage, whereas pathological crying with left-sided lesions. In 19 reports detailing mood following hemispherectomy, right hemispherectomy was associated with euphoric mood change. In reports of 91 patients with ictal outbursts of laughing (gelastic epilepsy), foci were predominantly left-sided. These case reports converged to suggest predominant role of the right hemisphere in mood regulation, with an overlay of left hemispheric involvement in positive affect. Other clinical-pathological association studies, closely linked with animal studies, have revealed the interplay between limbic structures and frontal control systems in regulating emotion and social behavior. Most notably, the Klüver-Bucy (1937) syndrome demonstrated the role of amygdala and hippocampal regions in emotional regulation. Patients with this syndrome, and primates with lesions in such limbic regions, show emotional lability and may vacillate between docile behavior and uncontrollable emotional outbursts.

Author Manuscript

The clinical case studies were complemented by animal and human laboratory studies that helped refine these hypotheses and generated rigorous measures linking social cognition to brain function. Studies used techniques such as visual half-field presentations, capitalizing on the projection of each visual field to the contralateral hemisphere (Natale, Gur & Gur, 1983). For example, using chimeric presentations, Sackeim, Gur, & Saucy (1978) found that emotions are expressed more intensely on the left side of the face, and that this effect is specific to negative emotions (Sackeim & Gur, 1978; Indersmitten & Gur 2003). Electrophysiological studies have supported the link between hemispheric functioning and emotion processing (Davidson et al., 2000; Gasbarri et al., 2007). In addition to linking brain function to behavior, such studies have helped generate measures of social cognition and emotion processing that could be applied in the emerging methodology of functional neuroimaging. Early functional neuroimaging studies of behavioral domains again focused on cognitive processes such as language, attention and memory, yet some findings relevant to social cognition did emerge. For example, mood induction effects were seen in a cortico-limbic system that correlated with subjective ratings (Schneider et al., 1994, 1995) and was triggered by the experience of confronting unsolvable anagrams (Schneider et al., 1996). The introduction of functional MRI vastly accelerated mapping of social and emotional constructs into brain systems by introducing a safe procedure that yielded measures of regional brain activation. An outline of the main components of the social brain became clearer, implicating amygdala, orbitofrontal and ventromedial and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex as its main hubs (Davidson et al., 2000).

Author Manuscript

The mounting capabilities and increased application of fMRI has propelled a vast expansion of the study of neural substrates for social cognition. Beyond characterizing common and separable brain systems for identifying facial and vocal emotions (Leitman et al., 2010), studies have examined social cognition domains such as moral judgment (Greene, 2015), sexual attraction (Bolomont et al., 2014), response to baby schema (Glocker et al., 2009), empathy (Bruneau et al., 2015; Rêgo et al., 2015), and deception (Langleben et al., 2005). More recent studies have examined effects of risk taking and reward valuations, linking


Gur and Gur

Page 4

Author Manuscript

limbic with cortico-striatal pathways (Cox and Kable, 2014; Doll et al., 2015). The overlap in activation between facial emotion identification tasks and other social cognition tasks underscores the need to define aspects of emotion processing with dissociable neuronal representations, such as facial feature perception relative to empathy. Results of such studies have yielded, and will continue to offer multiple behavioral measures related to social cognition that can link to specific brain systems and can serve as domain measures relatable to psychopathology as envisioned by the RDoC initiative.

Author Manuscript

It is noteworthy that constructs examined during functional neuroimaging may differ when examined outside of the scanner (Gur, Erwin, & Gur, 1992). For example, Pinkham et al (2012) found that performance on a trustworthiness task changed when evaluated during fMRI compared to a psychological laboratory setting. Likewise, the Social Cognition and Functioning (SCAF) study indicated that the psychometric properties of measures in neuroscience may differ when used in behavioral paradigms (Green & Penn, 2013; Kern et al. 2013). It is also important to note that emotion identification may not be one construct, but multiple ones, especially when one compares identification of positive to negative emotions.

Criteria for RDoC Domains

Author Manuscript

For a measure of social cognition to represent an RDoC domain it needs to be reliably tractable across several levels of analysis and extendable to basic and, ultimately, molecular genetic levels of analysis. Validating such a measure would require demonstration of adequate psychometric properties such as internal consistency and construct validity, and evidence for external validity such as association with known sources of individual differences like age and sex. Additional requirements for such a measure are, in the context of the RDoC vision, that it has been reliably coupled to activation in brain systems implicated in social cognition, that it is sensitive to the presence of psychiatric symptomatology and, finally, that it is heritable and thus likely to be linkable to genetic influences and mechanisms. Here we will illustrate such a measure, facial emotion identification.

The facial emotion identification test

Author Manuscript

The task itself is straightforward: a face is presented that is either neutral or expressing an emotion and the participant chooses the appropriate label from an array of options. In our first implementation of the test, we used only happy and sad expressions and found substantial deficits in people with schizophrenia (Heimberg et al., 1992). In depression we found a specific deficit of misidentifying neutral emotions as sad (Gur et al., 1992). Subsequent implementation of the task extended the emotional expressions to include anger, fear and disgust (Gur et al., 2002; Figure 1). In this format the test was administered with functional MRI and in large-scale genetic studies.


Gur and Gur

Page 5

Author Manuscript

Normative Variation – Sex differences and Development

Author Manuscript

From early implementations of the test, sex differences were evident with females outperforming males and mobilizing fewer brain resources as indicated by more circumscribed activation in fMRI (Gur et al., 2002). This sex difference seems to extend to other social cognition tasks. For example, in the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort (PNC), a population based sample of youth ages 8–21 (Calkins et al., 2014; Gur et al., 2012), a comprehensive computerized neurocognitive battery (CNB, Gur et al., 2010) showed sex differences in cognitive performance where some domains (e.g., verbal memory) were performed more accurately and faster by females, others more accurately and faster by males (e.g., spatial processing), yet for other tests, one sex was faster and the other more accurate (e.g., attention, working memory). For the social cognition tests, which included emotion identification, emotion intensity differentiation and age differentiation, females performed more accurately and were faster on all tests (Roalf et al., 2014). When examining the development of this ability, it is evident that there is great improvement from age 8 to age 21 in both accuracy and speed with large effect sizes (0.9 to 1.0). Nonetheless, females outperform males starting in childhood and the difference remains stable throughout early adulthood and even increasing for speed. A similar pattern is seen for the other social cognition tests in the CNB (Figure 2). Thus, the emotion identification test is sensitive to normative individual differences in performance as affected by age and sex.


Emotion identification is associated with recruitment of a well-established brain system for emotion processing, centered around the amygdala. Human lesion and neuroimaging studies have documented the role of the amygdala in arousal and anxiety (Campbell-Sills et al., 2011) mood (Dyck et al., 2011), emotion identification (Gur et al., 2002; Loughead et al., 2008; Derntl et al., 2009), social affiliation (Carter et al., 2008) and threat perception (Feinstein et al., 2011; Guyer et al., 2008; LeDoux, 2003). Identification of emotional content of a face is a fundamental social process (LeDoux, 2000, 2003). Neuroimaging studies in healthy people have delineated a circuit involved in facial affect perception, including fusiform, temporolimbic and frontal regions, such as amygdala, orbitofrontal cortex, and insula (Harris et al., 2014; Haxby et al., 2000; Vuilleumier and Pourtois, 2007). While amygdala responses have been linked to processing of stimulus salience and both positive and negative valence (Zald, 2003), convergent evidence suggests that the amygdala plays a unique role in the perception and processing of threat-related signals (Fitzgerald et al., 2006; Phelps and LeDoux, 2005). Consistent with animal studies of fear conditioning (LeDoux, 2003), the amygdala responds to potentially threatening social signals, such as angry or fearful faces (Gur et al., 2002; Mattavelli et al., 2014). Thus, the role of the amygdala is not specific to emotion perception and it plays a more general role such as assigning salience to events. Furthermore, aspects of this complex structure serve diverse behavioral functions and connect differentially to striatal and sensory or motor systems. Below we will summarize findings related to schizophrenia, where deficits in facial emotion identification have been documented, to illustrate how such a domain can anchor an RDoC framed investigation.


Gur and Gur

Page 6

Author Manuscript

Psychopathology An important requirement for a domain to be compatible with the RDoC vision, is that deficits are associated with psychopathology. Social-affective neuroscience has been considered as offering pathways to elucidating neuropsychiatric disorders, where social behavior and emotion processing and expression are impacted (Cacioppo et al., 2014). In most psychiatric disorders difficulties in social functioning are evident and the underlying neural processes and systems have been examined. The RDoC approach provides a new framework for translational work on deficits in social cognition (Insel et al., 2010). The phenotypic features of social cognition implicate several complementary social-emotional dimensions - negative/positive valence, intensity/arousal and social approach/avoidance.

Author Manuscript

Schizophrenia

Author Manuscript

Schizophrenia is characterized by positive and negative symptoms and by cognitive and affective deficits. While positive symptoms have traditionally been the focus of investigation, others and we documented neurobiological abnormalities related to negative symptoms and social-emotional deficits. Negative symptoms are a central feature of schizophrenia (American Psychiatric Association, 2013; Kirkpatrick et al., 2006), with clinical significance demonstrated by independence of other symptoms (Blanchard and Cohen, 2006, Harvey et al., 2006; Keefe et al., 2006), relation to functional impairment (Milev et al. 2005; Fenton and McGlashan, 1991; Lyne et al., 2015; Bellack et al., 1990; Mueser et al., 1990; Horan and Blanchard, 2003) and presence in neuroleptic naïve patients (Shtasel et al., 1992; Siegel et al., 2006; Lyne et al., 2015). Longitudinal studies show limited improvement with first- or second-generation antipsychotics (Murphy et al., 2006; Subotnik et al., 2015; Üçok and Ergül, 2015) or even an optimized early intervention program by a 10-year followup (Secher et al., 2015).

Author Manuscript

Across medicine there has been a concerted focus on early identification of disorders where rapid intervention can favorably impact disease course. In recent years, a similar approach has been applied to schizophrenia with studies of adolescents and young adults who present with attenuated psychotic symptoms and might be at the prodromal phase of illness (Yung et al., 2003; Cannon et al., 2008; Ruhrmann et al., 2010). While the possible inclusion of Attenuated Psychosis Syndrome in DSM-5 has been debated (Carpenter and van Os, 2011) it is noteworthy that the emphasis is on positive psychotic symptoms of delusions, hallucinations and disorganized speech. Yet, anxiety and depression are common features in the prodrome and the emergence of negative symptoms is, at times, misconstrued as depression (Rosen et al., 2006; Wigman et al., 2011). Not only are lack of social engagement and diminished expressivity early warning signs, but they are part of the emerging illness that may precede the onset of attenuated psychotic symptoms and portend poor outcome (Hafner et al., 2003; Marchesi et al., 2015). Affective features of schizophrenia, which may represent extremes of the dimensions highlighted above, have been related to amygdala function and circuitry (Aleman and Kahn,


Gur and Gur

Page 7

Author Manuscript

2005; Gur et al., 2007). Individuals with schizophrenia are impaired in facial affect perception (Allott et al., 2015; Edwards et al., 2002; Gur et al., 2006; Heimberg et al., 1992; Kohler et al. 2010), especially for threat-related expressions of anger and fear (Edwards et al., 2001; Evangeli and Broks, 2000; Kohler et al., 2003). These deficits are associated with severity of negative symptoms (Gur et al., 2006, 2007). Longitudinal studies indicate persistent impairment, with symptom remission marginally improving performance (Key et al., 2003; Penn et al., 2000). Indeed, deficits on the emotion recognition test had the highest effect sizes (>1.0) for both accuracy and speed in two large samples, the first family-based and the second ascertained in a case-control design (Gur et al., Schiz Res 2015). More recent work demonstrates that these deficits are present as early as the first-episode and are also observed in youths at clinical high risk (CHR) (Addington et al., 2006; van Rijn et al., 2011). In a recent longitudinal study of CHR youths, the emotion identification test was the single best predictor of transition to psychosis (Corcoran et al., in press).

Author Manuscript

A recent study by Pinkham et al (2015) compared the ER40 to six other tests of social cognition: Ambiguous Intentions Hostility Questionnaire (AIHQ), Bell Lysaker Emotion Recognition Task (BLERT), Relationships Across Domains (RAD), Reading the Mind in the Eyes Task (Eyes), The Awareness of Social Inferences Test (TASIT), Hinting Task, and Trustworthiness Task. Tests were evaluated on test-retest reliability, utility as a repeated measure, relationship to functional outcome, practicality and tolerability, sensitivity to group differences, and internal consistency. While the ER40 was ranked overall below BLERT and Hinting, it is notable that only its overall accuracy score was used. Furthermore, issues such as practicality and tolerability have not been considered in the context of international genomic studies that make language-mediated tests like Hinting impractical.

Author Manuscript

The potential role of aberrant amygdala activity in the behavioral abnormalities of emotion processing in schizophrenia has been examined in two meta-analyses. One study observed under-recruitment of the amygdala regardless of whether the task was explicit or implicit, and independent of chronicity (Li et al., 2010). The other study replicated reduced amygdala activation, but importantly found that this deficit was only present when directly contrasting emotional to neutral expressions. This conclusion is consistent with previous reports of amygdala overactivation to neutral expressions (Gur et al., 2002; Hall et al., 2008). Further supporting the amygdala overactivation hypothesis, we found that while healthy participants activated amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex more when a neutral face was seen previously as threatening, patients activated these regions equally to both previously threatening and nonthreatening faces (Satterthwaite et al., 2010).

Author Manuscript

Variations in amygdala activity have been related to clinical features of schizophrenia (Pinkham et al., 2007), particularly positive symptoms (Taylor et al., 2002; 2005) and the paranoid subtype (Pinkham et al., 2008; Williams et al., 2004). A smaller literature relating negative symptoms to amygdala activity has focused on flat affect (Fahim et al., 2005; Lepage et al., 2011). Abnormally increased amygdala activation to fearful faces was associated with incorrect identification and with more pronounced flat affect (Gur et al., 2007).


Gur and Gur

Page 8


An understanding of amygdala function must also address interactions with other regions, as distinct circuits likely serve discrete roles in emotion processing and may relate differentially to symptom domains. Amygdala activation and connectivity was investigated in healthy people, schizophrenia patients and family members. Several limbic, striatal, thalamic, and cortical regions have been identified as constituting a “social brain circuitry” (Park et al., 2011). In healthy people we observed increased amygdala functional connectivity with lateral orbitofrontal cortex and anterior insula in response to threatening facial expressions (Satterthwaite et al., 2011) and abnormally high amygdala-orbitofrontal cortex /insula functional connectivity in schizophrenia in a facial recognition task with neutral faces (Satterthwaite et al., 2010). In contrast, ventral striatum and ventral pallidum preferentially respond to rewarding stimuli, and in healthy people we noted anticorrelated activity between amygdala and these regions during emotion identification (Satterthwaite et al., 2011). Ventromedial prefrontal cortex-amygdala interactions have been implicated in “top-down” modulation of negative emotions and in extinction or reversal of previous aversive associations (Leitman et al., 2011). Ventral prefrontal top-down modulation of facial emotion processing was reduced in schizophrenia (Kim et al., 2011). Weakening of ventromedial prefrontal cortex-amygdala functional connectivity has been reported in schizophrenia during emotional identification (Fakra et al., 2008) during negative distraction in a perceptual task (Anticevic et al., 2011), and in resting BOLD data, where greater aggression was associated with weaker ventral prefrontal cortex-amygdala connectivity (Hoptman et al., 2010).

Author Manuscript

Abnormalities in amgydala activation and functional connectivity during emotion processing have also been reported in those at genetic or clinical risk for schizophrenia. Studies in firstdegree family members reported elevated amgydala activity to emotional stimuli (van Buuren et al., 2011), normal activation during an implicit facial emotion paradigm (Rasetti et al., 2009), reduced activation during sad mood induction (Habel et al., 2004), and abnormally strong benzodiazepine-induced reductions in activation during emotion identification (wolf et al., 2011). Amminger el al. (2011) reported behavioral emotion identification deficits in both high-risk and first-episode subjects. Abnormal amgydala activation to fearful facial expressions and reduced prefrontal-amgydala functional connectivity were identified in fMRI studies of clinically psychosis-prone subjects (Venkatasubramanian et al., 2010; Modinos et al., 2010; Wolf et al., 2015).

Author Manuscript

These studies indicate that facial emotion identification and its underlying circuitry are dysfunctional in patients with schizophrenia and individuals at risk for schizophrenia. Thus, an index of emotion identification performance of the domain of social cognition could offer a continuous parameter that is measurable in healthy populations, is sensitive to normative variability related to sex differences and development, and yet differentiates patients with schizophrenia and those at risk for psychosis both in performance and in the activation of related brain circuitry. The remaining criterion for a measure to meet RDoC requirements as a potential domain that can be studied from the molecular to the clinical levels of analysis is association with genetic variability.


Gur and Gur

Page 9

Author Manuscript

Links to Genetics The likelihood that a behavioral measure will elucidate a mechanistic cascade from cellularmolecular processes to clinical phenomena is higher if there is evidence that it is heritable. Social cognition measures, including emotion identification, have been applied in large-scale genetic studies where they were examined as candidate endophenotypic measures (Knowles et al., 2015). In several collaborative studies we have shown that heritability for emotion identification is significant and at least similar in magnitude to that observed for neurocognitive measures.

Author Manuscript

The multiplex multigenerational family study of schizophrenia showed estimated heritability of 0.373 for emotion identification efficiency (Gur et al., 2007). In an independent family study of African-Americans the heritability for emotion identification accuracy was 0.43 and for speed 0.21 (Calkins et al., 2010). In a third independent family sample, emotion identification was also heritable and linked with other endophenotypes to several genes (Greenwood et al., 2011, 2013). In the PNC sample we used genome-wide complex trait analysis to estimate the SNP-based heritability of each of the CNB domains. Several domains, including emotion identification, suggested strong influence of common genetic variants (Robinson et al., 2014). These preliminary results are encouraging. As progress in the field requires multiple levels of analysis, translational research in animal models benefits from converging paradigms, such as affiliative behavior, and additional measures of brain function, such as electrophysiology.


A complementary approach for elucidating gene effects on behavior is to study individuals with a known CNV that is associated with increased vulnerability to psychosis. In particular, CNV with relative higher frequency can be used to examine both common effects and those associated with variability in the deletion size and in intermediate phenotypes. The 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome (22q11DS) is an example of such a CNV and is associated with about 25% increase risk for schizophrenia with onset in adolescence and young adulthood. We examined emotion identification performance in a large sample of individuals with this deletion and found significant deficits already evident in youth (Gur et al., 2014). Furthermore, fMRI studies indicate aberrant activation to facial stimuli (Andersson et al., 2008) and we found that amygdala overactivation was modulated by the emotion expressed (Gur et al., 2015). Multiple psychiatric diagnoses are associated with 22q11DS, related to developmental stage. A translational approach to social cognition can advance efforts toward a mechanistic account that will likely transcend current diagnostic boundaries. Applying fMRI tasks designed to probe the underlying circuitry of emotion identification can help delineate the nodes in the circuitry that underlie these deficits. Such a dimensional approach can be complemented with mouse models that examine affiliate behavior. Efforts by the Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium have recently identified 128 established and novel loci in large samples of cases and controls (Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, 2014). Notably, common variants between schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, autism spectrum disorders and intellectual disability were observed, buttressing the importance of examining common behavioral domains implicated in these disorders, such as social cognition. Classification


Gur and Gur

Page 10

Author Manuscript

along these dimensional measures will ultimately yield the mechanistically based diagnostic nomenclature.

Psychosis Spectrum Disorders

Author Manuscript

Since RDoC domains aim to examine constructs that relate to basic neurobiological processes, abnormalities would have implications across phenotypically defined disorders. The emotion identification test was applied in the Bipolar-Schizophrenia Network on Intermediate Phenotypes. They reported progressively increased deficits compared to controls from bipolar disorder to schizoaffective disorder to schizophrenia. There was some specificity of effects related to the emotion, with proband and relative groups showing similar deficits for angry and neutral faces, while schizophrenia probands had deficits for fearful, happy and sad faces (Ruocco et al., 2014). This finding is consistent with the pattern of emotion identification deficits observed in relatives of probands with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorders who had bipolar illness (Calkins et al., 2010). Thus, emotion identification deficits are evident across psychosis and recruiting individuals to studies based on performance on social cognition measures could shade light on a spectrum of severe psychiatric disorders as envisioned by the RDoC.

References


Addington J, Saeedi H, Addington D. Influence of social perception and social knowledge on cognitive and social functioning in early psychosis. Br J Psychiatry. 2006; 189:373–378. [PubMed: 17012662] Adolphs R. Social cognition and the human brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3. 1999; 12:469–479. Aleman A, Kahn RS. Strange feelings: do amygdala abnormalities dysregulate the emotional brain in schizophrenia? Prog Neurobiol. 2005; 77:283–298. [PubMed: 16352388] Allott KA, Rice S, Bartholomeusz CF, Klier C, Schlögelhofer M, Schäfer MR, Amminger GP. Emotion recognition in unaffected first-degree relatives of individuals with first-episode schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2005; 161:322–328. [PubMed: 25533595] American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth Edition. DSM-5. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2013. Amminger GP, Schäfer MR, Papageorgiou K, Klier CM, Schlögelhofer M, Mossaheb N, WerneckRohrer S, Nelson B, McGorry PD. Emotion recognition in individuals at clinical high-risk for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2012; 38:1030–1039. [PubMed: 21422108] Andersson F, Glaser B, Spiridon M, Debbane M, Vuilleumier P, Eliez S. Impaired activation of face processing networks revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Biol Psychiatry. 2008; 63:49–57. [PubMed: 17651704] Anticevic A, Repovs G, Barch DM. Emotion effects on attention, amygdala activation, and functional connectivity in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2012; 38:967–980. [PubMed: 21415225] Babinski J. Contribution a I’btude des troubles mentaux dans l’hemiplegie organique cbebrale (anosognosie). Rw. Neural. (Paris). 1914; 27:845–848. Blanchard JJ, Cohen AS. The structure of negative symptoms within schizophrenia: implications for assessment. Schizophr Bull. 2006; 32:238–245. [PubMed: 16254064] Bolmont M, Cacioppo JT, Cacioppo S. Love is in the gaze: an eye-tracking study of love and sexual desire. Psychol Sci. 2014; 25:1748–1756. [PubMed: 25031302] Broca P. Remarques sur le siege de la faculte du langage articule, suivies d’une observation d’aphemie (perte de la parole). BUN Sot Anat. 1861; 6:330–357. Bruneau EG, Jacoby N, Saxe R. Empathic control through coordinated interaction of amygdala, theory of mind and extended pain matrix brain regions. Neuroimage. 2015 Apr 22. [Epub ahead of print].


Gur and Gur

Page 11

Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript

Cacioppo JT, Cacioppo S, Dulawa S, Palmer AA. Social neuroscience and its potential contribution to psychiatry. World Psychiatry. 2014; 13:131–139. [PubMed: 24890058] Calkins ME, Tepper P, Gur RC, Ragland JD, Klei L, Wiener HW, Richard J, Savage RM, Allen TB, O'Jile J, Devlin B, Kwentus J, Aliyu MH, Bradford LD, Edwards N, Lyons PD, Nimgaonkar VL, Santos AB, Go RC, Gur RE. Project among African-Americans to explore risks for schizophrenia (PAARTNERS): evidence for impairment and heritability of neurocognitive functioning in families of schizophrenia patients. Am J Psychiatry. 2010; 167:459–472. [PubMed: 20194479] Calkins ME, Moore TM, Merikangas KR, Burstein M, Satterthwaite TD, Bilker WB, Ruparel K, Chiavacci R, Wolf DH, Mentch F, Qiu H, Connolly JJ, Sleiman PA, Hakonarson H, Gur RC, Gur RE. The psychosis spectrum in a young U.S. community sample: findings from the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort. World Psychiatry. 2014; 13:296–305. [PubMed: 25273303] Campbell-Sills L, Simmons AN, Lovero KL, Rochlin AA, Paulus MP, Stein MB. Functioning of neural systems supporting emotion regulation in anxiety-prone individuals. Neuroimage. 2011; 54:689–696. [PubMed: 20673804] Cannon TD, Cadenhead K, Cornblatt B, et al. Prediction of psychosis in youth at high clinical risk: a multisite longitudinal study in North America. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008; 65:28–37. [PubMed: 18180426] Carpenter WT, van Os J. Should Attenuated Psychosis Syndrome Be a DSM-5 Diagnosis? Am J Psychiatry. 2011; 168:460–463. [PubMed: 21536700] Carter EJ, Pelphrey KA. Friend or foe? Brain systems involved in the perception of dynamic signals of menacing and friendly social approaches. Soc Neurosci. 2008; 3:151–163. [PubMed: 18633856] Corcoran CM, Keilp JG, Kayser J, Klim CC, Butler PD, Bruder GE, Gur RE, Javitt DC. Emotion recognition deficits as predictors of transition in individuals at clinical high risk for schizophrenia: a neurodevelopmental perspective. Psychological Medicine. 2015 (in press). Cox KM, Kable JW. BOLD subjective value signals exhibit robust range adaptation. J Neurosci. 2014; 34:16533–16543. [PubMed: 25471589] Damasio H, Grabowski T, Frank R, Galaburda AM, Damasio AR. The return of Phineas Gage: clues about the brain from the skull of a famous patient. Science. 1994; 264:1102–1105. [PubMed: 8178168] Davidson RJ, Putnam KM, Larson CL. Dysfunction in the neural circuitry of emotion regulation--a possible prelude to violence. Science. 2000; 289:591–594. [PubMed: 10915615] Derntl B, Habel U, Windischberger C, Robinson S, Kryspin-Exner I, Gur RC, Moser E. General and specific responsiveness of the amygdala during explicit emotion recognition in females and males. BMC Neurosci. 2009; 10:91. [PubMed: 19653893] Doll BB, Duncan KD, Simon DA, Shohamy D, Daw ND. Model-based choices involve prospective neural activity. Nat Neurosci. 2015; 18:767–772. [PubMed: 25799041] Dyck M, Loughead J, Kellermann T, Boers F, Gur RC, Mathiak K. Cognitive versus automatic mechanisms of mood induction differentially activate left and right amygdala. Neuroimage. 2011; 54:2503–2513. [PubMed: 20946960] Edwards J, Jackson HJ, Pattison PE. Emotion recognition via facial expression and affective prosody in schizophrenia: a methodological review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2002; 22:789–832. [PubMed: 12214327] Edwards J, Pattison PE, Jackson HJ, Wales RJ. Facial affect and affective prosody recognition in firstepisode schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2001; 48:235–253. [PubMed: 11295377] Evangeli M, Broks ME. Face processing in schizophrenia: parallels with the effects of amygdala damage. Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2000; 5:81–104. [PubMed: 16571513] Fahim C, Stip E, Mancini-Marïe A, Mensour B, Boulay LJ, Leroux JM, Beaudoin G, Bourgouin P, Beauregard M. Brain activity during emotionally negative pictures in schizophrenia with and without flat affect: an fMRI study. Psychiatry Res. 2005; 140:1–15. [PubMed: 16143498] Fakra E, Salgado-Pineda P, Delaveau P, Hariri AR, Blin O. Neural bases of different cognitive strategies for facial affect processing in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2008; 100:191–205. [PubMed: 18234477] Feinstein JS, Adolphs R, Damasio A, Tranel D. The human amygdala and the induction and experience of fear. Curr Biol. 2011; 21:34–38. [PubMed: 21167712]


Gur and Gur

Page 12


Fiske, ST.; Taylor, SE. Social Cognition. 2nd. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1991. Fitzgerald DA, Angstadt M, Jelsone LM, Nathan PJ, Phan KL. Beyond threat: amygdala reactivity across multiple expressions of facial affect. Neuroimage. 2006; 30:1441–1448. [PubMed: 16368249] Gainotti G. Emotional behavior and hemispheric side of the lesion. Cortex. 1972; 18:41–55. [PubMed: 5031258] Gasbarri A, Arnone B, Pompili A, Pacitti F, Pacitti C, Cahill L. Sex-related hemispheric lateralization of electrical potentials evoked by arousing negative stimuli. Brain Res. 2007; 1138:178–186. [PubMed: 17274960] Glocker ML, Langleben DD, Ruparel K, Loughead JW, Valdez JN, Griffin MD, Sachser N, Gur RC. Baby schema modulates the brain reward system in nulliparous women. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106:9115–9119. [PubMed: 19451625] Greene JD. The rise of moral cognition. Cognition. 2015; 135:39–42. [PubMed: 25498900] Green MF, Penn DL. Going from social neuroscience to schizophrenia clinical trials. Schizophr Bull. 2013; 39:1189–1191. [PubMed: 24072810] Greenwood TA, Lazzeroni LC, Murray SS, Cadenhead KS, Calkins ME, Dobie DJ, Green MF, Gur RE, Gur RC, Hardiman G, Kelsoe JR, Leonard S, Light GA, Nuechterlein KH, Olincy A, Radant AD, Schork NJ, Seidman LJ, Siever LJ, Silverman JM, Stone WS, Swerdlow NR, Tsuang DW, Tsuang MT, Turetsky BI, Freedman R, Braff DL. Analysis of 94 candidate genes and 12 endophenotypes for schizophrenia from the Consortium on the Genetics of Schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2011; 168:930–946. [PubMed: 21498463] Greenwood TA, Swerdlow NR, Gur RE, Cadenhead KS, Calkins ME, Dobie DJ, Freedman R, Green MF, Gur RC, Lazzeroni LC, Nuechterlein KH, Olincy A, Radant AD, Ray A, Schork NJ, Seidman LJ, Siever LJ, Silverman JM, Stone WS, Sugar CA, Tsuang DW, Tsuang MT, Turetsky BI, Light GA, Braff DL. Genome-wide linkage analyses of 12 endophenotypes for schizophrenia from the Consortium on the Genetics of Schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2013; 170:521–532. [PubMed: 23511790] Gur RC, Erwin RJ, Gur RE, Zwil AS, Heimberg C, Kraemer HC. Facial emotion discrimination: II. Behavioral findings in depression. Psychiatry Res. 1992; 42:241–251. [PubMed: 1496056] Gur RC, Sara R, Hagendoorn M, Maron O, Hughett P, Turner T, Bajcsy R, Gur RE. A method for obtaining 3-dimensional facial expressions and its standardization for use in neurocognitive studies. J Neurosci Methods. 2002a; 115:137–143. [PubMed: 11992665] Gur RC, Richard J, Hughett P, Calkins ME, Macy L, Bilker WB, Brensinger C, Gur RE. A cognitive neuroscience-based computerized battery for efficient measurement of individual differences: standardization and initial construct validation. J Neurosci Methods. 2010; 187:254–462. [PubMed: 19945485] Gur RC, Schroeder L, Turner T, McGrath C, Chan RM, Turetsky BI, Alsop D, Maldjian J, Gur RE. Brain activation during facial emotion processing. NeuroImage. 2002b; 16:651–662. [PubMed: 12169250] Gur RC, Richard J, Calkins ME, Chiavacci R, Hansen JA, Bilker WB, Loughead J, Connolly JJ, Qiu H, Mentch FD, Abou-Sleiman PM, Hakonarson H, Gur RE. Age group and sex differences in performance on a computerized neurocognitive battery in children age 8–21. Neuropsychology. 2012; 26:251–265. [PubMed: 22251308] Gur RC, Braff DL, Calkins ME, Dobie DJ, Freedman R, Green MF, Greenwood TA, Lazzeroni LC, Light GA, Nuechterlein KH, Olincy A, Radant AD, Seidman LJ, Siever LJ, Silverman JM, Sprock J, Stone WS, Sugar CA, Swerdlow NR, Tsuang DW, Tsuang MT, Turetsky BI, Gur RE. Neurocognitive performance in family-based and case-control studies of schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2015 [Epub ahead of print]. Gur RE, Loughead J, Kohler CG, Elliott MA, Lesko K, Ruparel K, Wolf DH, Bilker WB, Gur RC. Limbic activation associated with misidentification of fearful faces and flat affect in schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007a; 64:1356–1366. [PubMed: 18056543] Gur RE, Nimgaonkar VL, Almasy L, Calkins ME, Ragland JD, Pogue-Geile MF, Kanes S, Blangero J, Gur RC. Neurocognitive endophenotypes in a multiplex multigenerational family study of schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2007b; 164:813–819. [PubMed: 17475741]


Gur and Gur

Page 13


Gur RE, Kohler CG, Ragland JD, Siegel SJ, Lesko K, Bilker WB, Gur RC. Flat affect in schizophrenia: relation to emotion processing and neurocognitive measures. Schizophr Bull. 2006; 32:279–287. [PubMed: 16452608] Gur RE, Yi JJ, McDonald-McGinn DM, Tang SX, Calkins ME, Whinna D, Souders MC, Savitt A, Zackai EH, Moberg PJ, Emanuel BS, Gur RC. Neurocognitive development in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: comparison with youth having developmental delay and medical comorbidities. Mol Psychiatry. 2014; 19:1205–1211. [PubMed: 24445907] Gur, RE.; Yi, J.; Schmidt, JE.; Roalf, DR.; McDonald-McGinn, D.; Zackai, E.; Calkins, ME.; Ruparel, K.; Hopson, RD.; Cassidy, A.; Port, AM.; Souders, MC.; Gur, RC.; Emanuel, BS. Aberrant brain development and psychosis in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. International Congress of Schizophrenia Research; Colorado Springs, CO. 2015. Gur RC, Erwin RJ, Gur RE. Neurobehavioral probes for physiologic neuroimaging studies. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1992; 49:409–414. [PubMed: 1586277] Guyer AE, Monk CS, McClure-Tone EB, Nelson EE, Roberson-Nay R, Adler AD, Fromm SJ, Leibenluft E, Pine DS, Ernst M. A developmental examination of amygdala response to facial expressions. J Cogn Neurosci. 2008; 20:1565–1582. [PubMed: 18345988] Habel U, Klein M, Shah NJ, et al. Genetic load on amygdala hypofunction during sadness in nonaffected brothers of schizophrenia patients. Am J Psychiatry. 2004; 161:1806–1813. [PubMed: 15465977] Häfner H, Maurer K, Löffler W, an der Heiden W, Hambrecht M, Schultze-Lutter F. Modeling the early course of schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2003; 29:325–340. [PubMed: 14552507] Hall J, Whalley HC, McKirdy JW, Romaniuk L, McGonigle D, McIntosh AM, Baig BJ, Gountouna VE, Job DE, Donaldson DI, Sprengelmeyer R, Young AW, Johnstone EC, Lawrie SM. Overactivation of fear systems to neutral faces in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry. 2008; 64:70–73. [PubMed: 18295746] Harris RJ, Young AW, Andrews TJ. Dynamic stimuli demonstrate a categorical representation of facial expression in the amygdala. Neuropsychologia. 2014; 56:47–52. [PubMed: 24447769] Harvey PD, Koren D, Reichenberg A, Bowie CR. Negative symptoms and cognitive deficits: what is the nature of their relationship? Schizophr Bull. 2006; 32:250–258. [PubMed: 16221995] Haxby JV, Hoffman EA, Gobbini MI. The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000; 4:223–233. [PubMed: 10827445] Heimberg C, Gur RE, Erwin RJ, Shtasel DL, Gur RC. Facial emotion discrimination: III. Behavioral findings in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res. 1992; 42:253–265. [PubMed: 1496057] Hoptman MJ, D'Angelo D, Catalano D, Mauro CJ, Shehzad ZE, Kelly AM, Castellanos FX, Javitt DC, Milham MP. Amygdalofrontal functional disconnectivity and aggression in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2010; 36:1020–1028. [PubMed: 19336392] Horan WP, Blanchard JJ. Neurocognitive, social, and emotional dysfunction in deficit syndrome schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2003; 65:125–137. [PubMed: 14630305] Indersmitten T, Gur RC. Emotion processing in chimeric faces: hemispheric asymmetries in expression and recognition of emotions. J Neurosci. 2003; 23:3820–3825. [PubMed: 12736352] Insel T, Cuthbert B, Garvey M, Heinssen R, Pine DS, Quinn K, Sanislow C, Wang P. Research domain criteria (RDoC): toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders. Am J Psychiatry. 2010; 167:748–751. [PubMed: 20595427] Jackson, JH. On affections of speech from diseases of the brain. In: Taylor, J., editor. Selected Writings of John Hughlings Jackson. Vol. II. London: Hodder and Stoughton; 1932. p. 155-204. Kee KS, Green MF, Mintz J, Brekke JS. Is emotion processing a predictor of functional outcome in schizophrenia? Schizophr Bull. 2003; 29:487–497. [PubMed: 14609242] Keefe RS, Bilder RM, Harvey PD, Davis SM, Palmer BW, Gold JM, Meltzer HY, Green MF, Miller DD, Canive JM, Adler LW, Manschreck TC, Swartz M, Rosenheck R, Perkins DO, Walker TM, Stroup TS, McEvoy JP, Lieberman JA. Baseline neurocognitive deficits in the CATIE schizophrenia trial. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2006; 31:2033–2046. Kern RS, Penn DL, Lee J, Horan WP, Reise SP, Ochsner KN, Marder SR, Green MF. Adapting social neuroscience measures for schizophrenia clinical trials, Part 2: trolling the depths of psychometric properties. Schizophr Bull. 2013; 39:1201–1210. [PubMed: 24072805]


Gur and Gur

Page 14


Kim MJ, Loucks RA, Palmer AL, Brown AC, Solomon KM, Marchante AN, Whalen PJ. The structural and functional connectivity of the amygdala: From normal emotion to pathological anxiety. Behav Brain Res. 2011; 223:403–410. [PubMed: 21536077] Kirkpatrick B, Fenton WS, Carpenter WT, Marder SR. The NIMH-MATRICS consensus statement on negative symptoms. Schizophr Bull. 2006; 32:214–219. [PubMed: 16481659] Kluver H, Bucy PC. “Psychic blindness” and other symptoms following bilateral temporal lobectomy in rhesus monkeys. Am J Physiol. 1937; 119:352–353. Kohler CG, Turner TH, Bilker WB, Brensinger CM, Siegel SJ, Kanes SJ, Gur RE, Gur RC. Facial emotion recognition in schizophrenia: intensity effects and error pattern. Am J Psychiatry. 2003; 160:1768–1774. [PubMed: 14514489] Kohler CG, Walker JB, Martin EA, Healey KM, Moberg PJ. Facial emotion perception in schizophrenia: a meta-analytic review. Schizophr Bull. 2010; 36:1009–1019. [PubMed: 19329561] Knowles EE, McKay DR, Kent JW Jr, Sprooten E, Carless MA, Curran JE, de Almeida MA, Dyer TD, Göring HH, Olvera RL, Duggirala R, Fox PT, Almasy L, Blangero J, Glahn DC. Pleiotropic locus for emotion recognition and amygdala volume identified using univariate and bivariate linkage. Am J Psychiatry. 2015; 172:190–199. [PubMed: 25322361] Langleben DD, Loughead JW, Bilker WB, Ruparel K, Childress AR, Busch SI, Gur RC. Telling truth from lie in individual subjects with fast event-related fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp. 2005; 26:262–272. [PubMed: 16161128] LeDoux JE. Emotion circuits in the brain. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2000; 23:155–184. [PubMed: 10845062] LeDoux J. The emotional brain, fear, and the amygdala. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2003; 23:727–738. [PubMed: 14514027] Leitman DI, Wolf DH, Ragland JD, Laukka P, Loughead J, Valdez JN, Javitt DC, Turetsky BI, Gur RC. It's not what you say, but how you say it: A reciprocal temporo-frontal network for affective prosody. Front Hum Neurosci. 2010; 4:19. [PubMed: 20204074] Leitman DI, Wolf DH, Loughead J, Valdez JN, Kohler CG, Brensinger C, Elliott MA, Turetsky BI, Gur RE, Gur RC. Ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and the effects of task demand context on facial affect appraisal in schizophrenia. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2011; 6:66–73. [PubMed: 20212004] Lepage M, Sergerie K, Benoit A, Czechowska Y, Dickie E, Armony JL. Emotional face processing and flat affect in schizophrenia: functional and structural neural correlates. Psychol Med. 2011; 41:1833–1844. [PubMed: 21284912] Lewine RR. A discriminant validity study of negative symptoms with a special focus on depression and antipsychotic medication. Am J Psychiatry. 1990; 147:1463–1466. [PubMed: 1977328] Li H, Chan RC, McAlonan GM, Gong QY. Facial emotion processing in schizophrenia: a metaanalysis of functional neuroimaging data. Schizophr Bull. 2010; 36:1029–1039. [PubMed: 19336391] Loughead J, Gur RC, Elliott M, Gur RE. Neural circuitry for accurate identification of facial emotions. Brain Res. 2008; 1194:37–44. [PubMed: 18191116] Lyne J, Joober R, Schmitz N, Lepage M, Malla A. Duration of active psychosis and first-episode psychosis negative symptoms. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2015 [Epub ahead of print]. Marchesi C, Affaticati A, Monici A, De Panfilis C, Ossola P, Tonna M. Severity of core symptoms in first episode schizophrenia and long-term remission. Psychiatry Res. 225:129–132. [PubMed: 25467699] Mattavelli G, Sormaz M, Flack T, Asghar AU, Fan S, Frey J, Manssuer L, Usten D, Young AW, Andrews TJ. Neural responses to facial expressions support the role of the amygdala in processing threat. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014; 9:1684–1689. [PubMed: 24097376] Milev P, Ho BC, Arndt S, Andreasen NC. Predictive values of neurocognition and negative symptoms on functional outcome in schizophrenia: a longitudinal first-episode study with 7-year follow-up. Am J Psychiatry. 2005; 162:495–506. [PubMed: 15741466] Modinos G, Ormel J, Aleman A. Altered activation and functional connectivity of neural systems supporting cognitive control of emotion in psychosis proneness. Schizophr Res. 2010; 118:88–97. [PubMed: 20188516]


Gur and Gur

Page 15


Mueser KT, Bellack AS, Morrison RL, Wixted JT. Social competence in schizophrenia: premorbid adjustment, social skill, and domains of functioning. J Psychiatr Res. 1990; 24:51–63. [PubMed: 2366213] Murphy BP, Chung YC, Park TW, McGorry PD. Pharmacological treatment of primary negative symptoms in schizophrenia: a systematic review. Schizophr Res. 2006; 88:5–25. [PubMed: 16930948] Natale M, Gur RE, Gur RC. Hemispheric asymmetries in processing emotional expressions. Neuropsychologia. 1983; 21:555–565. [PubMed: 6646407] Park SH, Kim JJ, Kim CH, Kim JH, Lee KH. Sustained attention in the context of emotional processing in patients with schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res. 2011; 187:18–23. [PubMed: 21115200] Penn DL, Combs DR, Ritchie M, Francis J, Cassisi J, Morris S, Townsend M. Emotion recognition in schizophrenia: further investigation of generalized versus specific deficit models. J Abnorm Psychol. 2000; 109:512–516. [PubMed: 11016120] Penn DL, Sanna LJ, Roberts DL. Social cognition in schizophrenia: An overview. Schizophr Bull. 2008; 34:408–411. [PubMed: 18375928] Phelps EA, LeDoux JE. Contributions of the amygdala to emotion processing: from animal models to human behavior. Neuron. 2005; 48:175–187. [PubMed: 16242399] Pinkham AE, Hopfinger JB, Ruparel K, Penn DL. An investigation of the relationship between activation of a social cognitive neural network and social functioning. Schizophr Bull. 2008; 34:688–697. [PubMed: 18477583] Pinkham AE, Penn DL, Green MF, Harvey PD. Social Cognition Psychometric Evaluation: Results of the Initial Psychometric Study. Schizophr Bull. 2015 May 4. [Epub ahead of print]. Rasetti R, Mattay VS, Wiedholz LM, Kolachana BS, Hariri AR, Callicott JH, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Weinberger DR. Evidence that altered amygdala activity in schizophrenia is related to clinical state and not genetic risk. Am J Psychiatry. 2009; 166:216–225. [PubMed: 19074979] Rêgo GG, Lapenta OM, Marques LM, Costa TL, Leite J, Carvalho S, Gonçalves ÓF, Brunoni AR, Fregni F, Boggio PS. Hemispheric dorsolateral prefrontal cortex lateralization in the regulation of empathy for pain. Neurosci Lett. 2015; 594:12–16. [PubMed: 25805457] Roalf DR, Gur RE, Ruparel K, Calkins ME, Satterthwaite TD, Bilker WB, Hakonarson H, Harris LJ, Gur RC. Within-individual variability in neurocognitive performance: age- and sex-related differences in children and youths from ages 8 to 21. Neuropsychology. 2014; 28:506–518. [PubMed: 24773417] Roberts, DL.; Penn, DL. Social Cognition in Schizophrenia: From Evidence to treatment. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012. Robinson EB, Kirby A, Ruparel K, Yang J, McGrath L, Anttila V, Neale BM, Merikangas K, Lehner T, Sleiman PM, Daly MJ, Gur RC, Gur RE, Hakonarson H. The genetic architecture of pediatric cognitive abilities in the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort. Molecular Psychiatry. 2015 [Epub ahead of print]. Rosen JL, Miller TJ, D'Andrea JT, McGlashan TH, Woods SW. Comorbid diagnoses in patients meeting criteria for the schizophrenia prodrome. Schizophr Res. 2006; 85:124–131. [PubMed: 16650735] Ross ED, Mesulam MM. Dominant language functions of the right hemisphere? Prosody and emotional gesturing. Arch Neurol. 1979; 36:144–148. [PubMed: 435134] Ruhrmann S, Schultze-Lutter F, Salokangas RK, Heinimaa M, Linszen D, Dingemans P, Birchwood M, Patterson P, Juckel G, Heinz A, Morrison A, Lewis S, von Reventlow HG, Klosterkötter J. Prediction of psychosis in adolescents and young adults at high risk: results from the prospective European prediction of psychosis study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010; 67:241–251. [PubMed: 20194824] Ruocco AC, Reilly JL, Rubin LH, Daros AR, Gershon ES, Tamminga CA, Pearlson GD, Hill SK, Keshavan MS, Gur RC, Sweeney JA. Emotion recognition deficits in schizophrenia-spectrum disorders and psychotic bipolar disorder: Findings from the Bipolar-Schizophrenia Network on Intermediate Phenotypes (B-SNIP) study. Schizophr Res. 2014; 158:105–112. [PubMed: 25052782]


Gur and Gur

Page 16


Sackeim HA, Greenberg MS, Weiman AL, Gur RC, Hungerbuhler JP, Geschwind N. Hemispheric asymmetry in the expression of positive and negative emotions: Neurological Evidence. Arch Neurol. 1982; 39:210–218. [PubMed: 7041863] Sackeim HA, Gur RC. Lateral asymmetry in intensity of emotional expression. Neuropsychologia. 1978; 16:473–481. [PubMed: 692859] Sackeim HA, Gur RC, Saucy MC. Emotions are expressed more intensely on the left side of the face. Science. 1978; 202:434–436. [PubMed: 705335] Satterthwaite TD, Wolf DH, Loughead J, Ruparel K, Valdez JN, Siegel SJ, Kohler CG, Gur RE, Gur RC. Association of enhanced limbic response to threat with decreased cortical facial recognition memory response in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2010; 167:418–426. [PubMed: 20194482] Satterthwaite TD, Wolf DH, Pinkham AE, Ruparel K, Elliott MA, Valdez JN, Overton E, Seubert J, Gur RE, Gur RC, Loughead J. Opposing amygdala and ventral striatum connectivity during emotion identification. Brain Cogn. 2011; 76:353–363. [PubMed: 21600684] Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium. Biological insights from 108 schizophrenia-associated genetic loci. Nature. 2014; 511:421–427. [PubMed: 25056061] Schneider F, Gur RC, Jaggi JL, Gur RE. Differential effects of mood on cortical cerebral blood flow: a 133xenon clearance study. Psychiatry Res. 1994; 52:215–236. [PubMed: 7972576] Schneider F, Gur RE, Mozley LH, Smith RJ, Mozley PD, Censits DM, Alavi A, Gur RC. Mood effects on limbic blood flow correlate with emotional self-rating: a PET study with oxygen-15 labeled water. Psychiatry Res. 1995; 61:265–283. [PubMed: 8748470] Schneider F, Gur RE, Alavi A, Seligman ME, Mozley LH, Smith RJ, Mozley PD, Gur RC. Cerebral blood flow changes in limbic regions induced by unsolvable anagram tasks. Am J Psychiatry. 1996; 153:206–212. [PubMed: 8561200] Secher RG, Hjorthøj CR, Austin SF, Thorup A, Jeppesen P, Mors O, Nordentoft M. Ten-year follow-up of the OPUS specialized early intervention trial for patients with a first episode of psychosis. Schizophr Bull. 2015; 41:617–626. [PubMed: 25381449] Siegel SJ, Irani F, Brensinger CM, Kohler CG, Bilker WB, Ragland JD, Kanes SJ, Gur RC, Gur RE. Prognostic variables at intake and long-term level of function in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2006; 163:433–441. [PubMed: 16513864] Subotnik KL, Ventura J, Gretchen-Doorly D, Hellemann GS, Agee ER, Casaus LR, Luo JS, Villa KF, Nuechterlein KH. The impact of second-generation antipsychotic adherence on positive and negative symptoms in recent-onset schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2014; 159:95–100. [PubMed: 25108771] Taylor SF, Phan KL, Britton JC, Liberzon I. Neural response to emotional salience in schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2005; 30:984–995. Üçok A, Ergül C. Persistent negative symptoms after first episode schizophrenia: A 2-year follow-up study. Schizophr Res. 2014; 158:241–246. [PubMed: 25107850] van Buuren M, Vink M, Rapcencu AE, Kahn RS. Exaggerated brain activation during emotion processing in unaffected siblings of patients with schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry. 2011; 70:81–87. [PubMed: 21531384] van Rijn S, Schothorst P, Wout M, Sprong M, Ziermans T, van Engeland H, Aleman A, Swaab H. Affective dysfunctions in adolescents at risk for psychosis: emotion awareness and social functioning. Psychiatry Res. 2011; 187:100–105. [PubMed: 21094533] Venkatasubramanian G, Puthumana DT, Jayakumar PN, Gangadhar BN. A functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging study of neurohemodynamic abnormalities during emotion processing in subjects at high risk for schizophrenia. Indian J Psychiatry. 2010; 52:308–315. [PubMed: 21267363] Vuilleumier P, Pourtois G. Distributed and interactive brain mechanisms during emotion face perception: evidence from functional neuroimaging. Neuropsychologia. 2007; 45:174–194. [PubMed: 16854439] Wigman JT, Lin A, Vollebergh WA, van Os J, Raaijmakers QA, Nelson B, Baksheev G, Yung AR. Subclinical psychosis and depression: Co-occurring phenomena that do not predict each other over time. Schizophr Res. 2011; 130:277–281. [PubMed: 21458235]


Gur and Gur

Page 17

Author Manuscript

Williams LM, Das P, Harris AW, Liddell BB, Brammer MJ, Olivieri G, Skerrett D, Phillips ML, David AS, Peduto A, Gordon E. Dysregulation of arousal and amygdala-prefrontal systems in paranoid schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2004; 161:480–489. [PubMed: 14992974] Wolf DH, Satterthwaite TD, Loughead J, Pinkham A, Overton E, Elliott MA, Dent GW, Smith MA, Gur RC, Gur RE. Amygdala abnormalities in first-degree relatives of individuals with schizophrenia unmasked by benzodiazepine challenge. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2011; 218:503–512. [PubMed: 21603892] Wolf DH, Satterthwaite TD, Calkins ME, Ruparel K, Elliott MA, Hopson RD, Jackson CT, Prabhakaran K, Bilker WB, Hakonarson H, Gur RC, Gur RE. Functional neuroimaging abnormalities in youth with psychosis spectrum symptoms. JAMA Psychiatry. 2015 [Epub ahead of print]. Yung AR, Phillips LJ, Yuen HP, Francey SM, McFarlane CA, Hallgren M, McGorry PD. Psychosis prediction: 12-month follow up of a high-risk ("prodromal") group. Schizophr Res. 2003; 60:21– 32. [PubMed: 12505135] Zald DH. The human amygdala and the emotional evaluation of sensory stimuli. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2003; 41:88–123. [PubMed: 12505650]

Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 January 01.

Gur and Gur

Page 18

Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript

Figure 1.

Author Manuscript Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 January 01.

Gur and Gur

Page 19

Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Figure 2.

Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 January 01.

Endocannabinoid signaling in social functioning: an RDoC perspective.

Intercorporeality as a theory of social cognition.

Social cognition.

Engaging Research Domain Criteria (RDoC): Neurocircuitry in Search of Meaning.

Social Complexity as a Driver of Communication and Cognition.

The Research Domain Criteria (RDoC): an analysis of methodological and conceptual challenges.

Social cognition in ravens.

Social cognition in schizophrenia.

Social Cognition in Schizophrenia.

Social cognition in fishes.

Oxytocin and Social Cognition.

Oxytocin, social cognition and psychiatry.

Psychopathic traits from an RDoC perspective.

Social cognition in cocaine addiction.

Friends, friendlessness, and social cognition.

Neuro-cognition and social-cognition: application to exercise rehabilitation.

Assessment of Social Cognition and Theory of Mind: Initial Validation of the Geneva Social Cognition Scale.

Social brain circuitry and social cognition in infants born preterm.

How social cognition can inform social decision making.

The NIMH Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) Project: precision medicine for psychiatry.

Dysfunction of social cognition and behavior.

Stimulus independence, social cognition and consciousness.

Oxytocin, testosterone, and human social cognition.

Impaired social cognition in anorexia nervosa patients.