journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma 7 (2016) 71–79
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
ScienceDirect journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jcot
Review Article
Surgical approaches for total knee arthroplasty Raju Vaishya MS MCh FRCSa,*, Vipul Vijay MS DNB DipSICOTb, Daniel Mue Demesugh MDc, Amit Kumar Agarwal MS DNB MChb a Senior Consultant, Department of Orthopaedics & Joint Replacement Surgery, Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, New Delhi 110067, India b Consultant, Department of Orthopaedics & Joint Replacement Surgery, Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, New Delhi 110067, India c Clinical Fellow, Department of Orthopaedics & Joint Replacement Surgery, Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, New Delhi 110067, India
article info
abstract
Article history:
There are various surgical approaches to the knee joint and its surrounding structures and
Received 23 June 2015
such approaches are generally designed to allow the best access to an area of pathology
Accepted 13 November 2015
whilst safeguarding important surrounding structures. Controversy currently surrounds the
Available online 3 December 2015
optimal surgical approach for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The medial parapatellar arthrotomy, or anteromedial approach, has been the most used and has been regarded
Keywords:
as the standard approach for exposure of the knee joint. It provides extensive exposure and
Surgical approach
is useful for open anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, total knee replacement, and
Medial parapatellar approach
fixation of intra-articular fractures. Because this approach has been implicated in compro-
Total knee replacement (TKR)
mise of the patellar circulation, some authors have advocated the subvastus, midvastus, and trivector approaches for exposure of the knee joint. While these approaches expose the knee from the medial side, the anterolateral approach exposes the knee joint from the lateral side. With careful planning and arthrotomy selection, the anterior aspect of the joint can be adequately exposed for TKA in different clinical scenarios. # 2015 Delhi Orthopedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1.
Introduction
Total knee replacement surgery begins with correct planning of both the incision and the exposure of the joint. Indeed, these are factors that are just as crucial to an optimal outcome as choosing the right implant, positioning the components, and balancing the ligaments. Many knee procedures, nowadays, are routinely performed via arthroscopic or arthroscopic-assisted methods. However,
knowledge of open surgical access to the knee remains vital for knee arthroplasty and cases where arthroscopy is not possible or practical. Controversy currently surrounds the optimal surgical approach for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The best surgical approach in total knee replacement is still to be determined as none of the existing approaches could prove its superiority in previous studies.1–3 First described in 1879 by von Langenbeck,1 the medial parapatellar approach on the inner side of the knee found early favor and it is regarded as the gold standard for which other
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +91 9810123331. E-mail address: [email protected] (R. Vaishya). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2015.11.003 0976-5662/# 2015 Delhi Orthopedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
72
journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma 7 (2016) 71–79
approaches are compared.1–3 Hofmann reported on the quadriceps preserving subvastus approach in 1991.2 A compromise between preserving quadriceps function and good surgical exposure was achieved when Engh reported the midvastus approach in 1997.3 Others employ a lateral approach on the outside of the knee for TKA. Minimally invasive approaches are a more recent development, which aims to reduce damage to soft tissues. We have reviewed current literature on most commonly used approaches for TKA. Some of the benefits and disadvantages have been discussed with the view to establish the optimal surgical approach for different clinical scenarios in TKA.
1.1.
Anterior skin incisions
The most commonly used skin incision for primary TKA is an anterior midline incision and has been a utilitarian extensile approach to the knee. The incision should be done with the knee in flexion to allow the subcutaneous tissue to fall medially and laterally, which improves exposure and may obviate the need for raising skin flaps. A straight longitudinal incision beginning 6–12 cm proximal to superior pole of the patella, extending over patella midpoint, and ending at the medial border of tibial tuberosity or approximately 6 cm distal to the inferior pole of the patella; some surgeons prefer to vary the incision with a gentle medial curve over the patella, arguing that the curved incision is less likely to scar and contract (Fig. 1).4 The extent of the skin incision should be dictated by the requirements of the surgery. The skin incision is deepened through subcutaneous tissues and deep fascia is split in line with the skin incision to develop medial skin flap as thick as possible just superficial to the extensor mechanism to expose the quadriceps tendon, medial border of the patella, and medial border of the patellar tendon. Adequate skin incision reduces degree of skin retraction and lowers risk of tissue necrosis.5 If a preexisting anterior scar on the knee is in a usable position, it should be incorporated in the skin incision. Previous TKA skin incision should be used whenever possible. If multiple previous incisions are present, the most lateral usable incision should be selected if possible because the blood supply to the skin of the anterior knee tends to come predominantly from the medial side. Generally, previous direct medial and lateral incisions and transverse incisions can be ignored. The anterior Kocher U incision6 and the Putti inverted U incision7 have become obsolete, primarily because of complications associated with vascular compromise to the surrounding skin. The anterior transverse incision may be cosmetically pleasing, but it does not allow extensile exposure. Cutaneous blood supply may be tenuous in cases of previous surgery (revision TKA) or poor host (rheumatoid, diabetics, chronic steroid/NSAIDs therapy, obesity, and smoking), and hence, more liberal incisions should be used to avoid necrosis from forceful retraction. Skin is supplied by perforating arteries, which run in the muscular fascia, and so any medial or lateral skin flaps (if needed) should be just deep to the fascia to avoid skin necrosis. Old incisions should, as best as possible, be crossed at 908. Parallel longitudinal incisions are problematic, so maximizing the
Fig. 1 – Skin incision marked on the skin. Circle represents the patella and the straight line the skin incision. Horizontal lines across the vertical line help in achieving accurate closure.
skin bridge of 5–6 cm is recommended.8 In case of multiple skin incisions, the most lateral should be selected.
2.
Medial parapatellar approach
Historically, the medial parapatellar approach has been the standard to which other approaches are compared for TKA. As originally described by von Langenbeck in 1878,1 the approach followed the medial border of the quadriceps tendon, and left a cuff of tissue on the patella on which to repair the medial joint capsule. A standard longitudinal midline skin incision is done as previously described. The parapatellar retinacular incision is extended proximally along the length of the quadriceps tendon, leaving a 3- to 4-mm cuff of tendon on the vastus medialis for later closure (Fig. 2). The incision is continued around the medial side of the patella, extending 3–4 cm on to the antero-medial surface of the tibia along the medial border of the patellar tendon. Medial side of the knee is exposed by subperiosteally elevating the anteromedial capsule and deep
journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma 7 (2016) 71–79
73
of the knee. Injury to this nerve can lead to postoperative neuroma.8 If inadvertently cut during surgery, resect and bury end to decrease chance of painful neuroma.
3. Insall's modification to medial parapatellar approach
Fig. 2 – Clinical image depicting the incision for medial parapatellar approach.
medial collateral ligament off the tibia to the posteromedial corner of the knee. Extend the knee and evert the patella to allow an optional release of lateral patello-femoral plicae. In obese patients, if eversion of the patella is difficult, develop the lateral subcutaneous flap further so that the patella can be everted underneath this tissue, but this should be done with caution to leave adequate subcutaneous tissue under the skin to avoid the potential complication of flap necrosis. The infrapatellar fat pad is excised or retracted. The patella is dislocated and flipped laterally. It is important at this step to protect the insertion of the patellar tendon on tibia. If there is risk of the avulsion of the patellar tendon, as seen by excessive tension on the tendon, one wire/pin can be inserted at the patellar tendon insertion. If difficulty is encountered while flipping the patella, then incision can be extended between rectus femoris and vastus medialis proximally. The knee is finally flexed to 908 to gain exposure to entire knee joint. Advantage of this exposure is that it allows excellent exposures and it is relatively easy to safely execute. Drawbacks of this approach include disruption of the quadriceps mechanism at the junction of vastus medialis and the quadriceps tendon, hence destabilizing the patella.1 Superior lateral genicular artery is at risk during lateral retinacular release, as may be the last remaining blood supply after medial parapatellar approach and fat pad excision.8 Infrapatellar branch of saphenous nerves becomes subcutaneous on medial aspect of knee after piercing the fascia between the sartorius and gracilis and provides sensory to the anteromedial aspect
Insall reported a modification to the medial parapatellar approach, as described by Sir Robert Jones in 1971,9 because of extensor mechanism disruption, instability, and damage to the patellar articular surface. The extensor mechanism is exposed through a midline skin incision as previously described; the quadriceps tendon is divided 8–10 cm above the patella. The quadriceps tendon is incised at the junction of the medial third and lateral two-thirds of the patella and the quadriceps expansion is peeled from the medial third of anterior surface of the patella by sharp dissection until the medial border of the patella is visualized and the incision is followed along medial border of the patella leaving no cuff of tissue to make a repair (Fig. 3). The synovium is divided, and the fat pad is split along the midline and the patella is then dislocated laterally. The medial retinaculum is then sutured back to the remaining soft tissue attachment to the lateral 2/3rd of the patella. We routinely use this approach for performing exposure for simple primary TKA. We also use the ‘‘three stitch test’’ for checking any patellar maltracking. At the time of closure of the extensor apparatus, 3 stitches are applied between the medial retinaculum and the patella and the knee is flexed to 908. If all the stitches hold on flexion, there is no maltracking of the patella and the remaining closure can be performed as per the
Fig. 3 – Modified Insall's approach. Electrocautery being used to elevate the extensor apparatus from the patella.
74
journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma 7 (2016) 71–79
routine protocol. If even one of the stitches gives way, then there is apparent maltracking of the patella and needs to be addressed.10 The infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve is again at risk and should be protected. Advantage of this exposure is that it allows excellent exposures to the knee joint. However, reports of patellar dislocation, subluxation, stress fractures, and fragmentation of the patella secondary to avascular necrosis have been attributed to the approach.11,12
4.
Subvastus approach
Problems with the medial parapatellar approach motivated the search for more ‘‘anatomical’’ approaches. Hofman2 in 1991 popularized the subvastus approach for TKA, which first appeared in the German literature in 1929.13 The ideal patient for this subvastus approach is a thin patient with mobile soft tissue. Patients with previous scars, obesity, undergoing revision TKRs, and severe deformities are relative contraindications for this approach. This approach uses a straight midline skin incision that is extended above and below the patella. After development of a medial subcutaneous flap, the lower border of the vastus medialis is visualized. Because the vastus medialis inserts into the superior medial corner of the patella, the fascial sheath along the inferior border of the vastus medialis is incised from the patella down to the medial intermuscular septum. It is suggested that two stay sutures be applied at the apex of the patella and the dissection carried out in-between the sutures. These sutures can later be used as landmarks for anatomical resuturing of the tissues. It follows a transverse approach at the midpatella level through the medial retinaculum, inferior to the vastus medialis. The medial aspect of the vastus medialis is bluntly dissected from the medial intermuscular septum approximately 10 cm proximal to the adductor tubercle. This
incision separates the vastus medialis from the medial intermuscular septum staying distal to the aperture for femoral vessels. The arthrotomy then continues distally along the medial margin of the patella, with the medial retinaculum incised along the medial border of the patellar tendon and down onto the tibia; the extent of the exposure is dictated by the requirements of the surgery (Fig. 4). Care should be taken at this point to avoid injury to the neurovascular contents of Hunter's canal. To gain access to the joint, the capsule of the suprapatellar pouch should be divided to release the patella, which is everted and dislocated laterally as the knee is flexed. The subvastus approach, which allows direct access to the anterior knee joint, has been heralded as being more anatomic than the medial parapatellar arthrotomy. The subvastus approach leaves the extensor mechanism and the majority of medial vessels supplying the patella intact and studies suggest it has significant advantages over other approaches. Patients exhibit earlier straight leg raise, reduced blood loss, lower opiate consumption, and better knee flexion earlier in the recovery process.14 When compared with the medial parapatellar approach, patellar tracking was significantly improved in the subvastus group14 while hamstring to quadriceps ratio reached normal levels sooner.16 The advantages to this approach are offset by increased difficulty with exposure and greater difficulty everting the patella, which may explain why this is not a popularized technique.14,15 The subvastus approach is applicable to most reconstructive procedures of the knee, with the exception of lateral unicompartmental knee replacement arthroplasty.
5.
Midvastus approach
Difficulties with exposure using the subvastus approach prompted surgeons to develop a compromise, the midvastus approach, which is a muscle splitting approach first described
Fig. 4 – (a) Front view of the knee showing the dissection for subvastus approach. (b) Side view of the knee showing the plane along which the vastus medialis is elevated off the medial intermuscular septum.
journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma 7 (2016) 71–79
75
Fig. 5 – Midvastus approach to the knee.
by Engh in 1997.3 The midvastus muscle-splitting approach is performed through a standard anterior midline skin incision. The incision is carried down through subcutaneous tissue and deep fascia to expose the quadriceps musculature. The vastus medialis is identified and split full thickness, parallel to its muscle fibers by blunt dissection (Fig. 5). The quadriceps tendon is not incised. The incision is extended to the superior medial corner of the patella and then continued distally along the medial patella and patellar tendon to the level of the tibial tubercle or as dictated by the requirement of the surgery. As in the subvastus approach, the capsule of the suprapatellar pouch is divided so that the patella can be everted and dislocated laterally. Conflicting results have marked the development of this technique, as functional outcomes have not been proven to be superior in the long term.17 Parentis et al.18 noted electromyographic abnormalities in vastus medialis in patients undergoing the midvastus approach in 43% of cases compared with none in the medial parapatellar group. Keating et al.19 in a randomized prospective trial reported no differences in range of motion, straight leg raise, and requirement for lateral releases in a series of 100 patients. The authors did not recommend the approach as being superior to the medial parapatellar approach. Less blood loss18 and fewer intraoperative lateral releases have been reported.17–19 There have been equivocal opinions regarding the use of midvastus approach in patients with difficult access.19,20 Advocates of this approach believe that it is easier to evert the patella with the midvastus approach than with the subvastus approach because of the reduced bulk of the vastus medialis. In addition, this approach splits the muscle well away from its neurovascular supply.
6.
Trivector-retaining approach
The origin of the term trivector retaining approach is interesting. Using vector analysis, the vectors acting on the patella can be divided into medial, lateral, and superior vectors. The incision guides the magnitude and resultant direction of the pull on the patella.21,22 It is believed that by using the trivector approach, a significant part of the medial vector is retained and there is possibility of earlier recovery of
Fig. 6 – Image depicting dissection for Trivector approach to the knee.
quadriceps function. The trivector-retaining arthrotomy is a muscle cutting approach. The quadriceps musculature is exposed through an anterior midline skin incision. The vastus medialis obliquus muscle fibers are transected 1.5–2 cm medial to the quadriceps tendon. Because the quadriceps tendon is not incised with this approach, the incision is extended distally 1 cm medial to the patella and the patellar tendon to the level of the tibial tubercle. It is recommended that this approach be performed with the knee flexed 90–1108, so that the quadriceps musculature is under maximal tension and thinned out as much as possible during the incision (Fig. 6). To evert the patella and dislocate it laterally, the capsule of the suprapatellar pouch must be divided.22 This approach compromises some of the medial vessels supplying the patella and has been associated with increased blood loss, increased consumption of opiate, and disruption of the quadriceps mechanism.
7.
Lateral approach
The lateral approach, first published in 198223 and further developed by Keblish et al. in 1991,24 involves releasing the lateral soft tissues to access the joint from the lateral side of the patellar tendon. It is considered more technically demanding24 and as such it is used principally for TKA in valgus knees where use of the standard medial parapatellar approach can exacerbate patellar maltracking.25 The contracted lateral soft tissues can be approached directly while preserving the medial patellar blood supply. In performing this approach, a curvilinear midline skin incision or a laterally placed anterior skin incision is made
76
journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma 7 (2016) 71–79
medial soft tissues from the proximal tibia, external rotation of the tibia, and lateral retinacular release often are required to allow eversion without placing excessive stress on the insertion of the patellar tendon. Avulsion of the patellar tendon from the tibial tubercle can compromise knee function drastically and must be avoided. During eversion of the patella and flexion of the knee, the tibial insertion of the patellar tendon should be directly observed. If the medial fibers of the insertion begin to peel away from the tibial tubercle, tension should be released, and a more extensive, quadriceps-relaxing exposure should be considered.
8.1.
Fig. 7 – Lateral parapatellar approach to the knee.
and extended distally over the lateral border of the tibial tubercle. The joint is entered through a lateral parapatellar retinacular incision that extends from the lateral border of the quadriceps tendon, over the lateral margin of the patella, and continues distally into the anterior compartment fascia, 1.5 cm from the tibial tubercle and for a distance of 3 cm from the tibial tubercle (Fig. 7). A medial periosteal hinge is maintained along with the infrapatellar fat pad, which is used for later closure of the lateral retinacular defect.26,27 The lateral parapatellar approach may be considered in TKA for fixed valgus deformities that are isolated or combined with flexion contracture or external tibial rotation. Fixed varus deformity represents the only relative contraindication.
8.
Techniques for exposure of difficult TKA
Operative exposure for revision TKA, bony or fibrous ankylosis preceding previous surgeries, trauma, or infection around the knee pose a challenge to surgeons and require special consideration during exposure. A standard medial parapatellar approach is used in most revisions; however, the scarred capsule may need to be thinned, especially in reimplantation for infection. Scarring of the peripatellar fat pad and adjacent retinaculum may make patellar eversion difficult. Recreation of the medial and lateral gutters, subperiosteal release of the
Modified V-Y plasty
The modified V-Y quadriceps turndown procedure described by Scott and Siliski28 consists of a standard medial parapatellar retinacular incision with an additional limb extending as an inverted V across the quadriceps tendon through the lateral patellar retinaculum. The superior lateral geniculate artery, which runs at the inferior border of the vastus lateralis, is identified and preserved if possible. Excessive thinning of the scarred peripatellar fat pad should be avoided to prevent further devascularization of the patella. During closure of the quadriceps turndown, the inverted V can be converted to a Y by allowing the patella and attached quadriceps tendon to be advanced distally. This is useful in obtaining flexion in knees with quadriceps contractures from long-standing lack of flexion. The closure must be secured with nonabsorbable sutures to allow early passive motion within a ‘‘safe’’ range determined at the time of surgery to avoid excessive stress on the repair. Intraoperatively, a useful guide is to perform the repair so that gravity alone produces 908 of knee flexion. Studies by Windsor and Insall29 and Trousdale et al.30 have shown postoperative extension lag that tends to resolve over several months as quadriceps strength return to near-normal levels. Radiographic changes consistent with osteonecrosis of the patella were documented by Smith et al.31 in eight of the 29 revision total knee exposures using a quadriceps turndown, although clinical symptoms were absent.
8.2.
Rectus snip
The rectus ‘‘snip’’ as a modification of the quadriceps turndown procedure was described by Insall.32 The proximal extent of a medial parapatellar arthrotomy is extended laterally across the quadriceps tendon to incise the rectus tendon and the underlying tendinous insertion of the vastus muscles. The lateral attachment from the vastus lateralis is left intact along with the superior lateral geniculate vessels; a lateral release can be added distally. Meek et al.33 reported no differences in outcome between patients treated with a rectus snip and patients treated with a standard medial parapatellar approach.
8.3.
Tibial tubercle osteotomy
Tibial tubercle osteotomy was originally reported by Dolin34 and modified by Whiteside and Ohl35 for quadriceps relaxation during primary or revision TKA. Whiteside and Ohl recommended elevation of an 8- to 10-cm segment of the bone that
77
journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma 7 (2016) 71–79
includes the tibial tubercle and a portion of the anterior crest of the tibia, leaving the anterior compartment musculature attached to the fragment laterally for vascularity. The tubercle can be advanced proximally for patella baja or if the joint line is elevated significantly. They described reattaching the tubercle with multiple wires; other authors have advocated using screws. It is advisable to predrill the tibial tubercle before the osteotomy is done, if no proximal migration of the tubercle is contemplated. With secure fixation, passive range of motion can begun early, but active extension still must be delayed. Complications, including nonunion or proximal migration of the osteotomized fragment, tibial shaft fracture, wound infection, wound necrosis, and prominent hardware, have been reported with this technique. Barrack et al.36 compared the standard medial arthrotomy, rectus snip, V-Y quadricepsplasty, and tibial tubercle osteotomy in revision TKA. The outcomes with the standard approach and rectus snip were identical in all clinical parameters. V-Y quadricepsplasty resulted in greater extensor lag, but increased patient satisfaction compared with tibial tubercle osteotomy, which resulted in more difficulty with kneeling and stooping. The quadricepsplasty and osteotomy
groups had significantly lower outcome ratings compared with the standard arthrotomy and rectus snip.
9.
Modifications for minimal invasive TKA
The concept of mini-invasive prosthetic surgery was introduced in the late 1990s by Repicci,37 and it was based on the principles of a small incision (3 in.) and maximum preservation of the extensor mechanism on implantation of a unicompartmental prosthesis. Since then, many other authors have felt it necessary to extend this concept to total knee and hip replacement.38–40 Rosenberg et al.41 maintain that the skin incision does not define MIS per se, but then state that it should not exceed 10 cm. DiGioia et al.42 said that incisions should be between 8 and 10 cm. The aim of minimally invasive arthroplasty is the preservation of soft tissues and consequently quadriceps function and knee stability. The incision is shorter than that used for other approaches. Another important feature in the TKA is the retraction rather than eversion of the patella. Patient selection
Table 1 – Comparative table depicting the advantages and disadvantages of all the approaches to the knee for arthroplasty. Surgical approach Medial parapatella
Subvastus approach
Midvastus approach
Pros
Cons
Excellent exposures to the knee joint Extensile Relatively easy to safely execute Ideal for patients with previous scars, obesity, undergoing revision TKRs, and severe deformities. More ‘‘anatomical’’ approach Extensor mechanism and the majority of medial vessels supplying the patella intact Reduced blood loss, Lower opiate consumption Patients exhibit earlier straight leg raise, better knee flexion, and earlier recovery process. Compared with the medial parapatellar approach, patellar tracking was significantly improved in the subvastus group Hamstring to quadriceps ratio reached normal levels sooner Less Difficulty with exposure and everting the patella than with the subvastus approach Less blood loss and fewer intraoperative lateral releases compared to medial parapatella
Patellar dislocation, subluxation, stress fractures Fragmentation of the patella secondary to avascular necrosis
Trivector-retaining approach
?? Possibility of earlier recovery of quadriceps function
Lateral approach
Contracted lateral soft tissues can be approached directly while preserving the medial patellar blood supply Considered for fixed valgus deformities that are isolated or combined with flexion contracture or external tibial rotation Lower incidence of patellar maltracking Smaller incision with less esthetic impact Less soft tissue violation (capsule, tendon, and muscle structures) and faster postoperative recovery Retraction rather than eversion of the patella Reduced intraoperative blood loss Shorter hospital stays Intact quadriceps function and knee stability. Greater patient satisfaction
Minimal invasive total knee arthroplasty
Difficulty with exposure and greater difficulty everting the patella Risk of neurovascular damage in 'Hunters canal' Ideal mainly for thin patient with mobile soft tissue
Electromyographic abnormalities in vastus medialis No differences in range of motion, straight leg raise, requirement for lateral releases, and functional outcome compared to medial parapatella Compromises some of the medial vessels supplying the patella Increased blood loss Increased consumption of opiate Disruption of the quadriceps mechanism More technically demanding Fixed varus deformity is a relative contraindication
Obesity and poor bone stock are relative contraindications. Development still in evolution (surgical precision, long-term fuctional outcome unclear) Steep learning curve Cost implications (Expensive)
78
journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma 7 (2016) 71–79
is an important consideration for this approach with weight and poor bone stock being relative contraindications. The theoretical principles of less invasive surgery are sound, and certainly desirable. A smaller incision with less esthetic impact, greater patient satisfaction, greater respect for the capsule, tendon and muscle structures, faster postoperative recovery, reduced intraoperative blood loss, shorter hospital stays, increased range of motion at 6 weeks follow-up whilst achieving similar implant positioning are undoubtedly parameters of interest to all orthopedic surgeons, but it remains to be demonstrated that these objectives can be achieved by going down the MIS route. Ultimately, a ‘‘less invasive’’ approach based on maximum safeguarding of the anatomical structures through reduction of surgical exposure (in accordance with the surgeon's skill and experience) is desirable, but only if it is not at the expense of the surgical precision that is crucial for a good long-term outcome.
10.
Conclusion
Critical to surgical exposure of the knee is a complete understanding of the local anatomy. With such knowledge, the pathological condition and planned surgery can be correlated. Although the medial parapatellar arthrotomy or anteromedial approach has been the most used and has been regarded as the standard approach of exposure of the knee joint, the choice of surgical approach for TKA should be dictated by the presenting clinical scenario, as well as the training and experience of the surgeon (Table 1). With careful planning and arthrotomy selection, the anterior aspect of the joint can be adequately exposed for TKA.
Conflicts of interest The authors have none to declare.
references
1. Von Langenbeck B. Zur resection des kniegellenks. Verhandlungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Churg. 1878;7:23– 30. 2. Hofmann AA, Plaster RL, Murdock LE. Subvastus (Southern) approach for primary total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;269:70–77. 3. Engh GA, Holt BT, Parks NL. A midvastus muscle-splitting approach for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 1997;12:322–331. 4. Warren RF, Marshall JL. The supporting structures and layers on the medial side of the knee: an anatomical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979;61:56–63. 5. Younger ASE, Duncan CP, Masri BA. Surgical exposures in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1998;6:55–64. 6. Ksander GA, Vistnes LM, Rose EH. Excisional wound biomechanics, skin tension lines and elastic contraction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1977;59:398–410. 7. Reider B, Marshall JL, Koslin B. The anterior aspect of the knee joint: an anatomical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981;63:351–365.
8. Stern SH, Moeckel BH, Insall JN. Total knee arthroplasty in valgus knees. Clin Orthop. 1991;273:5–8. 9. Insall J. A midline approach to the knee. J Bone Jt Surg Am Ed. 1971;53:1584–1586. 10. Vaishya R, Singh AP, Vaish A. Outcome of subvastus approach in elderly nonobese patients undergoing bilateral simultaneous total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled study. Indian J Orthop. 2013;47(4):430–431. 11. Mochizuki RM, Schurman DJ. Patellar complications following total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am Ed. 1979;61:879–883. 12. Moreland JR. Mechanisms of failure in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1988;226:49–64. 13. Erkes F. Weitere erfahrungen mit physiologischer schnitt fuhrung zur eroffnung des kniegelenks. Beitrage zur klinischen Chirurgie. 1929;147:221. 14. Roysam GS, Oakley MJ. Subvastus approach for total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, and observerblinded trial. J Arthroplast. 2001;16:454–457. 15. Matsueda M, Gustilo RB. Subvastus and medial parapatellar approaches in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 2000;371:161–168. 16. Chang CH, Chen KH, Yang RS, Liu TK. Muscle torques in total knee arthroplasty with subvastus and parapatellar approaches. Clin Orthop. 2002;398:189–195. 17. Maestro A, Suarez MA, Rodriguez L, Guerra C, Murcia A. The midvastus surgical approach in total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2000;24:104–107. 18. Parentis MA, Rumi MN, Deol GS, Kothari M, Parrish WM, Pellegrini VD. A comparison of the vastus splitting and median parapatellar approaches in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1999;367:107–116. 19. White RE, Allman JK, Trauger JA, Dales BH. Clinical comparison of the midvastus and medial parapatellar surgical approaches. Clin Orthop. 1999;367:117–122. 20. Engh GA, Parks NL. Surgical technique of the midvastus arthrotomy. Clin Orthop. 1998;351:270–274. 21. Keating EM, Faris PM, Meding JB, Ritter MA. Comparison of the midvastus muscle-splitting approach with the median parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1999;14:29–32. 22. Bramlett KW. The Trivector Arthrotomy Approach. AAOS Instructional Videotape. 1994, June. 23. Cameron HU, Fedorkow DM. The patella in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1982;165:197–199. 24. Keblish PA. The lateral approach to the valgus knee. Surgical technique and analysis of 53 cases with over two year followup evaluation. Clin Orthopaed Relat Res. 1991;271:52–62. 25. Keblish PA. The lateral approach for total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2003;16:62–68. 26. Buechel FF. Lateral Approach. Master Technique in Orthopedic Surgery: Knee Arthroplasty. New York: Raven Press; 1995:25–39. 27. Keblish PA. Valgus deformity in total knee arthroplasty: the lateral retinacular approach. Orthop Trans. 1985;9:28–39. 28. Coonse K, Adams JD. A new operative approach to the knee joint. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1943;77:344. 29. Windsor RE, Insall JN. Exposure in revision total knee arthroplasty: the femoral peel. Tech Orthop. 1988;3:1. 30. Trousdale RT, Hanssen AD, Rand JA. V-Y quadricepsplasty in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;286:48. 31. Smith PN, Parker DA, Gelinas J. Radiographic changes in the patella following quadriceps turndown for revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2004;19:714. 32. Insall JN, Thompson FM, Brause BD. Two-stage reimplantation for the salvage of infected total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. 1983;65:1087–1098. 33. Meek RM, Greidanus NV, McGraw RW. The extensile rectus snip exposure in revision of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. 2003;85:1120–1131.
journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma 7 (2016) 71–79
34. Dolin MG. Osteotomy of the tibial tubercle in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg. 1983;65: 704–714. 35. Whiteside LA, Ohl MD. Tibial tubercle osteotomy for exposure of the difficult total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;260:6. 36. Barrack RL, Smith P, Munn B. Comparison of surgical approaches in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;356:16. 37. Repicci JA, Eberle RW. Minimally invasive surgical technique for unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J South Orthop Assoc. 1999;8:20–27.
79
38. Bonutti PM. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty – midvastus approach. J Arthroplasty. 2004;43:139–145. 39. Bonutti PM, Mont MA, Kester MA. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004;35:217–226. 40. Chauhan SK. Computer-assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. J Joint Arthroplast. 2004;45:216–225. 41. Rosenberg AG. How should we teach MSI? In: Hozack WJ, Krismer M, Nogler M, eds. et al. In: Minimally Invasive Total Joint Arthroplasty. Heidelberg: Springer; 2004:329–332. 42. DiGioia AM, Blendea S, Jaramaz B. Computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery: minimally invasive hip and knee reconstruction. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004;35:183–189.
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
ScienceDirect journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jcot
Review Article
Surgical approaches for total knee arthroplasty Raju Vaishya MS MCh FRCSa,*, Vipul Vijay MS DNB DipSICOTb, Daniel Mue Demesugh MDc, Amit Kumar Agarwal MS DNB MChb a Senior Consultant, Department of Orthopaedics & Joint Replacement Surgery, Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, New Delhi 110067, India b Consultant, Department of Orthopaedics & Joint Replacement Surgery, Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, New Delhi 110067, India c Clinical Fellow, Department of Orthopaedics & Joint Replacement Surgery, Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, New Delhi 110067, India
article info
abstract
Article history:
There are various surgical approaches to the knee joint and its surrounding structures and
Received 23 June 2015
such approaches are generally designed to allow the best access to an area of pathology
Accepted 13 November 2015
whilst safeguarding important surrounding structures. Controversy currently surrounds the
Available online 3 December 2015
optimal surgical approach for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The medial parapatellar arthrotomy, or anteromedial approach, has been the most used and has been regarded
Keywords:
as the standard approach for exposure of the knee joint. It provides extensive exposure and
Surgical approach
is useful for open anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, total knee replacement, and
Medial parapatellar approach
fixation of intra-articular fractures. Because this approach has been implicated in compro-
Total knee replacement (TKR)
mise of the patellar circulation, some authors have advocated the subvastus, midvastus, and trivector approaches for exposure of the knee joint. While these approaches expose the knee from the medial side, the anterolateral approach exposes the knee joint from the lateral side. With careful planning and arthrotomy selection, the anterior aspect of the joint can be adequately exposed for TKA in different clinical scenarios. # 2015 Delhi Orthopedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1.
Introduction
Total knee replacement surgery begins with correct planning of both the incision and the exposure of the joint. Indeed, these are factors that are just as crucial to an optimal outcome as choosing the right implant, positioning the components, and balancing the ligaments. Many knee procedures, nowadays, are routinely performed via arthroscopic or arthroscopic-assisted methods. However,
knowledge of open surgical access to the knee remains vital for knee arthroplasty and cases where arthroscopy is not possible or practical. Controversy currently surrounds the optimal surgical approach for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The best surgical approach in total knee replacement is still to be determined as none of the existing approaches could prove its superiority in previous studies.1–3 First described in 1879 by von Langenbeck,1 the medial parapatellar approach on the inner side of the knee found early favor and it is regarded as the gold standard for which other
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +91 9810123331. E-mail address: [email protected] (R. Vaishya). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2015.11.003 0976-5662/# 2015 Delhi Orthopedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
72
journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma 7 (2016) 71–79
approaches are compared.1–3 Hofmann reported on the quadriceps preserving subvastus approach in 1991.2 A compromise between preserving quadriceps function and good surgical exposure was achieved when Engh reported the midvastus approach in 1997.3 Others employ a lateral approach on the outside of the knee for TKA. Minimally invasive approaches are a more recent development, which aims to reduce damage to soft tissues. We have reviewed current literature on most commonly used approaches for TKA. Some of the benefits and disadvantages have been discussed with the view to establish the optimal surgical approach for different clinical scenarios in TKA.
1.1.
Anterior skin incisions
The most commonly used skin incision for primary TKA is an anterior midline incision and has been a utilitarian extensile approach to the knee. The incision should be done with the knee in flexion to allow the subcutaneous tissue to fall medially and laterally, which improves exposure and may obviate the need for raising skin flaps. A straight longitudinal incision beginning 6–12 cm proximal to superior pole of the patella, extending over patella midpoint, and ending at the medial border of tibial tuberosity or approximately 6 cm distal to the inferior pole of the patella; some surgeons prefer to vary the incision with a gentle medial curve over the patella, arguing that the curved incision is less likely to scar and contract (Fig. 1).4 The extent of the skin incision should be dictated by the requirements of the surgery. The skin incision is deepened through subcutaneous tissues and deep fascia is split in line with the skin incision to develop medial skin flap as thick as possible just superficial to the extensor mechanism to expose the quadriceps tendon, medial border of the patella, and medial border of the patellar tendon. Adequate skin incision reduces degree of skin retraction and lowers risk of tissue necrosis.5 If a preexisting anterior scar on the knee is in a usable position, it should be incorporated in the skin incision. Previous TKA skin incision should be used whenever possible. If multiple previous incisions are present, the most lateral usable incision should be selected if possible because the blood supply to the skin of the anterior knee tends to come predominantly from the medial side. Generally, previous direct medial and lateral incisions and transverse incisions can be ignored. The anterior Kocher U incision6 and the Putti inverted U incision7 have become obsolete, primarily because of complications associated with vascular compromise to the surrounding skin. The anterior transverse incision may be cosmetically pleasing, but it does not allow extensile exposure. Cutaneous blood supply may be tenuous in cases of previous surgery (revision TKA) or poor host (rheumatoid, diabetics, chronic steroid/NSAIDs therapy, obesity, and smoking), and hence, more liberal incisions should be used to avoid necrosis from forceful retraction. Skin is supplied by perforating arteries, which run in the muscular fascia, and so any medial or lateral skin flaps (if needed) should be just deep to the fascia to avoid skin necrosis. Old incisions should, as best as possible, be crossed at 908. Parallel longitudinal incisions are problematic, so maximizing the
Fig. 1 – Skin incision marked on the skin. Circle represents the patella and the straight line the skin incision. Horizontal lines across the vertical line help in achieving accurate closure.
skin bridge of 5–6 cm is recommended.8 In case of multiple skin incisions, the most lateral should be selected.
2.
Medial parapatellar approach
Historically, the medial parapatellar approach has been the standard to which other approaches are compared for TKA. As originally described by von Langenbeck in 1878,1 the approach followed the medial border of the quadriceps tendon, and left a cuff of tissue on the patella on which to repair the medial joint capsule. A standard longitudinal midline skin incision is done as previously described. The parapatellar retinacular incision is extended proximally along the length of the quadriceps tendon, leaving a 3- to 4-mm cuff of tendon on the vastus medialis for later closure (Fig. 2). The incision is continued around the medial side of the patella, extending 3–4 cm on to the antero-medial surface of the tibia along the medial border of the patellar tendon. Medial side of the knee is exposed by subperiosteally elevating the anteromedial capsule and deep
journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma 7 (2016) 71–79
73
of the knee. Injury to this nerve can lead to postoperative neuroma.8 If inadvertently cut during surgery, resect and bury end to decrease chance of painful neuroma.
3. Insall's modification to medial parapatellar approach
Fig. 2 – Clinical image depicting the incision for medial parapatellar approach.
medial collateral ligament off the tibia to the posteromedial corner of the knee. Extend the knee and evert the patella to allow an optional release of lateral patello-femoral plicae. In obese patients, if eversion of the patella is difficult, develop the lateral subcutaneous flap further so that the patella can be everted underneath this tissue, but this should be done with caution to leave adequate subcutaneous tissue under the skin to avoid the potential complication of flap necrosis. The infrapatellar fat pad is excised or retracted. The patella is dislocated and flipped laterally. It is important at this step to protect the insertion of the patellar tendon on tibia. If there is risk of the avulsion of the patellar tendon, as seen by excessive tension on the tendon, one wire/pin can be inserted at the patellar tendon insertion. If difficulty is encountered while flipping the patella, then incision can be extended between rectus femoris and vastus medialis proximally. The knee is finally flexed to 908 to gain exposure to entire knee joint. Advantage of this exposure is that it allows excellent exposures and it is relatively easy to safely execute. Drawbacks of this approach include disruption of the quadriceps mechanism at the junction of vastus medialis and the quadriceps tendon, hence destabilizing the patella.1 Superior lateral genicular artery is at risk during lateral retinacular release, as may be the last remaining blood supply after medial parapatellar approach and fat pad excision.8 Infrapatellar branch of saphenous nerves becomes subcutaneous on medial aspect of knee after piercing the fascia between the sartorius and gracilis and provides sensory to the anteromedial aspect
Insall reported a modification to the medial parapatellar approach, as described by Sir Robert Jones in 1971,9 because of extensor mechanism disruption, instability, and damage to the patellar articular surface. The extensor mechanism is exposed through a midline skin incision as previously described; the quadriceps tendon is divided 8–10 cm above the patella. The quadriceps tendon is incised at the junction of the medial third and lateral two-thirds of the patella and the quadriceps expansion is peeled from the medial third of anterior surface of the patella by sharp dissection until the medial border of the patella is visualized and the incision is followed along medial border of the patella leaving no cuff of tissue to make a repair (Fig. 3). The synovium is divided, and the fat pad is split along the midline and the patella is then dislocated laterally. The medial retinaculum is then sutured back to the remaining soft tissue attachment to the lateral 2/3rd of the patella. We routinely use this approach for performing exposure for simple primary TKA. We also use the ‘‘three stitch test’’ for checking any patellar maltracking. At the time of closure of the extensor apparatus, 3 stitches are applied between the medial retinaculum and the patella and the knee is flexed to 908. If all the stitches hold on flexion, there is no maltracking of the patella and the remaining closure can be performed as per the
Fig. 3 – Modified Insall's approach. Electrocautery being used to elevate the extensor apparatus from the patella.
74
journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma 7 (2016) 71–79
routine protocol. If even one of the stitches gives way, then there is apparent maltracking of the patella and needs to be addressed.10 The infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve is again at risk and should be protected. Advantage of this exposure is that it allows excellent exposures to the knee joint. However, reports of patellar dislocation, subluxation, stress fractures, and fragmentation of the patella secondary to avascular necrosis have been attributed to the approach.11,12
4.
Subvastus approach
Problems with the medial parapatellar approach motivated the search for more ‘‘anatomical’’ approaches. Hofman2 in 1991 popularized the subvastus approach for TKA, which first appeared in the German literature in 1929.13 The ideal patient for this subvastus approach is a thin patient with mobile soft tissue. Patients with previous scars, obesity, undergoing revision TKRs, and severe deformities are relative contraindications for this approach. This approach uses a straight midline skin incision that is extended above and below the patella. After development of a medial subcutaneous flap, the lower border of the vastus medialis is visualized. Because the vastus medialis inserts into the superior medial corner of the patella, the fascial sheath along the inferior border of the vastus medialis is incised from the patella down to the medial intermuscular septum. It is suggested that two stay sutures be applied at the apex of the patella and the dissection carried out in-between the sutures. These sutures can later be used as landmarks for anatomical resuturing of the tissues. It follows a transverse approach at the midpatella level through the medial retinaculum, inferior to the vastus medialis. The medial aspect of the vastus medialis is bluntly dissected from the medial intermuscular septum approximately 10 cm proximal to the adductor tubercle. This
incision separates the vastus medialis from the medial intermuscular septum staying distal to the aperture for femoral vessels. The arthrotomy then continues distally along the medial margin of the patella, with the medial retinaculum incised along the medial border of the patellar tendon and down onto the tibia; the extent of the exposure is dictated by the requirements of the surgery (Fig. 4). Care should be taken at this point to avoid injury to the neurovascular contents of Hunter's canal. To gain access to the joint, the capsule of the suprapatellar pouch should be divided to release the patella, which is everted and dislocated laterally as the knee is flexed. The subvastus approach, which allows direct access to the anterior knee joint, has been heralded as being more anatomic than the medial parapatellar arthrotomy. The subvastus approach leaves the extensor mechanism and the majority of medial vessels supplying the patella intact and studies suggest it has significant advantages over other approaches. Patients exhibit earlier straight leg raise, reduced blood loss, lower opiate consumption, and better knee flexion earlier in the recovery process.14 When compared with the medial parapatellar approach, patellar tracking was significantly improved in the subvastus group14 while hamstring to quadriceps ratio reached normal levels sooner.16 The advantages to this approach are offset by increased difficulty with exposure and greater difficulty everting the patella, which may explain why this is not a popularized technique.14,15 The subvastus approach is applicable to most reconstructive procedures of the knee, with the exception of lateral unicompartmental knee replacement arthroplasty.
5.
Midvastus approach
Difficulties with exposure using the subvastus approach prompted surgeons to develop a compromise, the midvastus approach, which is a muscle splitting approach first described
Fig. 4 – (a) Front view of the knee showing the dissection for subvastus approach. (b) Side view of the knee showing the plane along which the vastus medialis is elevated off the medial intermuscular septum.
journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma 7 (2016) 71–79
75
Fig. 5 – Midvastus approach to the knee.
by Engh in 1997.3 The midvastus muscle-splitting approach is performed through a standard anterior midline skin incision. The incision is carried down through subcutaneous tissue and deep fascia to expose the quadriceps musculature. The vastus medialis is identified and split full thickness, parallel to its muscle fibers by blunt dissection (Fig. 5). The quadriceps tendon is not incised. The incision is extended to the superior medial corner of the patella and then continued distally along the medial patella and patellar tendon to the level of the tibial tubercle or as dictated by the requirement of the surgery. As in the subvastus approach, the capsule of the suprapatellar pouch is divided so that the patella can be everted and dislocated laterally. Conflicting results have marked the development of this technique, as functional outcomes have not been proven to be superior in the long term.17 Parentis et al.18 noted electromyographic abnormalities in vastus medialis in patients undergoing the midvastus approach in 43% of cases compared with none in the medial parapatellar group. Keating et al.19 in a randomized prospective trial reported no differences in range of motion, straight leg raise, and requirement for lateral releases in a series of 100 patients. The authors did not recommend the approach as being superior to the medial parapatellar approach. Less blood loss18 and fewer intraoperative lateral releases have been reported.17–19 There have been equivocal opinions regarding the use of midvastus approach in patients with difficult access.19,20 Advocates of this approach believe that it is easier to evert the patella with the midvastus approach than with the subvastus approach because of the reduced bulk of the vastus medialis. In addition, this approach splits the muscle well away from its neurovascular supply.
6.
Trivector-retaining approach
The origin of the term trivector retaining approach is interesting. Using vector analysis, the vectors acting on the patella can be divided into medial, lateral, and superior vectors. The incision guides the magnitude and resultant direction of the pull on the patella.21,22 It is believed that by using the trivector approach, a significant part of the medial vector is retained and there is possibility of earlier recovery of
Fig. 6 – Image depicting dissection for Trivector approach to the knee.
quadriceps function. The trivector-retaining arthrotomy is a muscle cutting approach. The quadriceps musculature is exposed through an anterior midline skin incision. The vastus medialis obliquus muscle fibers are transected 1.5–2 cm medial to the quadriceps tendon. Because the quadriceps tendon is not incised with this approach, the incision is extended distally 1 cm medial to the patella and the patellar tendon to the level of the tibial tubercle. It is recommended that this approach be performed with the knee flexed 90–1108, so that the quadriceps musculature is under maximal tension and thinned out as much as possible during the incision (Fig. 6). To evert the patella and dislocate it laterally, the capsule of the suprapatellar pouch must be divided.22 This approach compromises some of the medial vessels supplying the patella and has been associated with increased blood loss, increased consumption of opiate, and disruption of the quadriceps mechanism.
7.
Lateral approach
The lateral approach, first published in 198223 and further developed by Keblish et al. in 1991,24 involves releasing the lateral soft tissues to access the joint from the lateral side of the patellar tendon. It is considered more technically demanding24 and as such it is used principally for TKA in valgus knees where use of the standard medial parapatellar approach can exacerbate patellar maltracking.25 The contracted lateral soft tissues can be approached directly while preserving the medial patellar blood supply. In performing this approach, a curvilinear midline skin incision or a laterally placed anterior skin incision is made
76
journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma 7 (2016) 71–79
medial soft tissues from the proximal tibia, external rotation of the tibia, and lateral retinacular release often are required to allow eversion without placing excessive stress on the insertion of the patellar tendon. Avulsion of the patellar tendon from the tibial tubercle can compromise knee function drastically and must be avoided. During eversion of the patella and flexion of the knee, the tibial insertion of the patellar tendon should be directly observed. If the medial fibers of the insertion begin to peel away from the tibial tubercle, tension should be released, and a more extensive, quadriceps-relaxing exposure should be considered.
8.1.
Fig. 7 – Lateral parapatellar approach to the knee.
and extended distally over the lateral border of the tibial tubercle. The joint is entered through a lateral parapatellar retinacular incision that extends from the lateral border of the quadriceps tendon, over the lateral margin of the patella, and continues distally into the anterior compartment fascia, 1.5 cm from the tibial tubercle and for a distance of 3 cm from the tibial tubercle (Fig. 7). A medial periosteal hinge is maintained along with the infrapatellar fat pad, which is used for later closure of the lateral retinacular defect.26,27 The lateral parapatellar approach may be considered in TKA for fixed valgus deformities that are isolated or combined with flexion contracture or external tibial rotation. Fixed varus deformity represents the only relative contraindication.
8.
Techniques for exposure of difficult TKA
Operative exposure for revision TKA, bony or fibrous ankylosis preceding previous surgeries, trauma, or infection around the knee pose a challenge to surgeons and require special consideration during exposure. A standard medial parapatellar approach is used in most revisions; however, the scarred capsule may need to be thinned, especially in reimplantation for infection. Scarring of the peripatellar fat pad and adjacent retinaculum may make patellar eversion difficult. Recreation of the medial and lateral gutters, subperiosteal release of the
Modified V-Y plasty
The modified V-Y quadriceps turndown procedure described by Scott and Siliski28 consists of a standard medial parapatellar retinacular incision with an additional limb extending as an inverted V across the quadriceps tendon through the lateral patellar retinaculum. The superior lateral geniculate artery, which runs at the inferior border of the vastus lateralis, is identified and preserved if possible. Excessive thinning of the scarred peripatellar fat pad should be avoided to prevent further devascularization of the patella. During closure of the quadriceps turndown, the inverted V can be converted to a Y by allowing the patella and attached quadriceps tendon to be advanced distally. This is useful in obtaining flexion in knees with quadriceps contractures from long-standing lack of flexion. The closure must be secured with nonabsorbable sutures to allow early passive motion within a ‘‘safe’’ range determined at the time of surgery to avoid excessive stress on the repair. Intraoperatively, a useful guide is to perform the repair so that gravity alone produces 908 of knee flexion. Studies by Windsor and Insall29 and Trousdale et al.30 have shown postoperative extension lag that tends to resolve over several months as quadriceps strength return to near-normal levels. Radiographic changes consistent with osteonecrosis of the patella were documented by Smith et al.31 in eight of the 29 revision total knee exposures using a quadriceps turndown, although clinical symptoms were absent.
8.2.
Rectus snip
The rectus ‘‘snip’’ as a modification of the quadriceps turndown procedure was described by Insall.32 The proximal extent of a medial parapatellar arthrotomy is extended laterally across the quadriceps tendon to incise the rectus tendon and the underlying tendinous insertion of the vastus muscles. The lateral attachment from the vastus lateralis is left intact along with the superior lateral geniculate vessels; a lateral release can be added distally. Meek et al.33 reported no differences in outcome between patients treated with a rectus snip and patients treated with a standard medial parapatellar approach.
8.3.
Tibial tubercle osteotomy
Tibial tubercle osteotomy was originally reported by Dolin34 and modified by Whiteside and Ohl35 for quadriceps relaxation during primary or revision TKA. Whiteside and Ohl recommended elevation of an 8- to 10-cm segment of the bone that
77
journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma 7 (2016) 71–79
includes the tibial tubercle and a portion of the anterior crest of the tibia, leaving the anterior compartment musculature attached to the fragment laterally for vascularity. The tubercle can be advanced proximally for patella baja or if the joint line is elevated significantly. They described reattaching the tubercle with multiple wires; other authors have advocated using screws. It is advisable to predrill the tibial tubercle before the osteotomy is done, if no proximal migration of the tubercle is contemplated. With secure fixation, passive range of motion can begun early, but active extension still must be delayed. Complications, including nonunion or proximal migration of the osteotomized fragment, tibial shaft fracture, wound infection, wound necrosis, and prominent hardware, have been reported with this technique. Barrack et al.36 compared the standard medial arthrotomy, rectus snip, V-Y quadricepsplasty, and tibial tubercle osteotomy in revision TKA. The outcomes with the standard approach and rectus snip were identical in all clinical parameters. V-Y quadricepsplasty resulted in greater extensor lag, but increased patient satisfaction compared with tibial tubercle osteotomy, which resulted in more difficulty with kneeling and stooping. The quadricepsplasty and osteotomy
groups had significantly lower outcome ratings compared with the standard arthrotomy and rectus snip.
9.
Modifications for minimal invasive TKA
The concept of mini-invasive prosthetic surgery was introduced in the late 1990s by Repicci,37 and it was based on the principles of a small incision (3 in.) and maximum preservation of the extensor mechanism on implantation of a unicompartmental prosthesis. Since then, many other authors have felt it necessary to extend this concept to total knee and hip replacement.38–40 Rosenberg et al.41 maintain that the skin incision does not define MIS per se, but then state that it should not exceed 10 cm. DiGioia et al.42 said that incisions should be between 8 and 10 cm. The aim of minimally invasive arthroplasty is the preservation of soft tissues and consequently quadriceps function and knee stability. The incision is shorter than that used for other approaches. Another important feature in the TKA is the retraction rather than eversion of the patella. Patient selection
Table 1 – Comparative table depicting the advantages and disadvantages of all the approaches to the knee for arthroplasty. Surgical approach Medial parapatella
Subvastus approach
Midvastus approach
Pros
Cons
Excellent exposures to the knee joint Extensile Relatively easy to safely execute Ideal for patients with previous scars, obesity, undergoing revision TKRs, and severe deformities. More ‘‘anatomical’’ approach Extensor mechanism and the majority of medial vessels supplying the patella intact Reduced blood loss, Lower opiate consumption Patients exhibit earlier straight leg raise, better knee flexion, and earlier recovery process. Compared with the medial parapatellar approach, patellar tracking was significantly improved in the subvastus group Hamstring to quadriceps ratio reached normal levels sooner Less Difficulty with exposure and everting the patella than with the subvastus approach Less blood loss and fewer intraoperative lateral releases compared to medial parapatella
Patellar dislocation, subluxation, stress fractures Fragmentation of the patella secondary to avascular necrosis
Trivector-retaining approach
?? Possibility of earlier recovery of quadriceps function
Lateral approach
Contracted lateral soft tissues can be approached directly while preserving the medial patellar blood supply Considered for fixed valgus deformities that are isolated or combined with flexion contracture or external tibial rotation Lower incidence of patellar maltracking Smaller incision with less esthetic impact Less soft tissue violation (capsule, tendon, and muscle structures) and faster postoperative recovery Retraction rather than eversion of the patella Reduced intraoperative blood loss Shorter hospital stays Intact quadriceps function and knee stability. Greater patient satisfaction
Minimal invasive total knee arthroplasty
Difficulty with exposure and greater difficulty everting the patella Risk of neurovascular damage in 'Hunters canal' Ideal mainly for thin patient with mobile soft tissue
Electromyographic abnormalities in vastus medialis No differences in range of motion, straight leg raise, requirement for lateral releases, and functional outcome compared to medial parapatella Compromises some of the medial vessels supplying the patella Increased blood loss Increased consumption of opiate Disruption of the quadriceps mechanism More technically demanding Fixed varus deformity is a relative contraindication
Obesity and poor bone stock are relative contraindications. Development still in evolution (surgical precision, long-term fuctional outcome unclear) Steep learning curve Cost implications (Expensive)
78
journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma 7 (2016) 71–79
is an important consideration for this approach with weight and poor bone stock being relative contraindications. The theoretical principles of less invasive surgery are sound, and certainly desirable. A smaller incision with less esthetic impact, greater patient satisfaction, greater respect for the capsule, tendon and muscle structures, faster postoperative recovery, reduced intraoperative blood loss, shorter hospital stays, increased range of motion at 6 weeks follow-up whilst achieving similar implant positioning are undoubtedly parameters of interest to all orthopedic surgeons, but it remains to be demonstrated that these objectives can be achieved by going down the MIS route. Ultimately, a ‘‘less invasive’’ approach based on maximum safeguarding of the anatomical structures through reduction of surgical exposure (in accordance with the surgeon's skill and experience) is desirable, but only if it is not at the expense of the surgical precision that is crucial for a good long-term outcome.
10.
Conclusion
Critical to surgical exposure of the knee is a complete understanding of the local anatomy. With such knowledge, the pathological condition and planned surgery can be correlated. Although the medial parapatellar arthrotomy or anteromedial approach has been the most used and has been regarded as the standard approach of exposure of the knee joint, the choice of surgical approach for TKA should be dictated by the presenting clinical scenario, as well as the training and experience of the surgeon (Table 1). With careful planning and arthrotomy selection, the anterior aspect of the joint can be adequately exposed for TKA.
Conflicts of interest The authors have none to declare.
references
1. Von Langenbeck B. Zur resection des kniegellenks. Verhandlungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Churg. 1878;7:23– 30. 2. Hofmann AA, Plaster RL, Murdock LE. Subvastus (Southern) approach for primary total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;269:70–77. 3. Engh GA, Holt BT, Parks NL. A midvastus muscle-splitting approach for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 1997;12:322–331. 4. Warren RF, Marshall JL. The supporting structures and layers on the medial side of the knee: an anatomical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979;61:56–63. 5. Younger ASE, Duncan CP, Masri BA. Surgical exposures in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1998;6:55–64. 6. Ksander GA, Vistnes LM, Rose EH. Excisional wound biomechanics, skin tension lines and elastic contraction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1977;59:398–410. 7. Reider B, Marshall JL, Koslin B. The anterior aspect of the knee joint: an anatomical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981;63:351–365.
8. Stern SH, Moeckel BH, Insall JN. Total knee arthroplasty in valgus knees. Clin Orthop. 1991;273:5–8. 9. Insall J. A midline approach to the knee. J Bone Jt Surg Am Ed. 1971;53:1584–1586. 10. Vaishya R, Singh AP, Vaish A. Outcome of subvastus approach in elderly nonobese patients undergoing bilateral simultaneous total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled study. Indian J Orthop. 2013;47(4):430–431. 11. Mochizuki RM, Schurman DJ. Patellar complications following total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am Ed. 1979;61:879–883. 12. Moreland JR. Mechanisms of failure in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1988;226:49–64. 13. Erkes F. Weitere erfahrungen mit physiologischer schnitt fuhrung zur eroffnung des kniegelenks. Beitrage zur klinischen Chirurgie. 1929;147:221. 14. Roysam GS, Oakley MJ. Subvastus approach for total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, and observerblinded trial. J Arthroplast. 2001;16:454–457. 15. Matsueda M, Gustilo RB. Subvastus and medial parapatellar approaches in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 2000;371:161–168. 16. Chang CH, Chen KH, Yang RS, Liu TK. Muscle torques in total knee arthroplasty with subvastus and parapatellar approaches. Clin Orthop. 2002;398:189–195. 17. Maestro A, Suarez MA, Rodriguez L, Guerra C, Murcia A. The midvastus surgical approach in total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2000;24:104–107. 18. Parentis MA, Rumi MN, Deol GS, Kothari M, Parrish WM, Pellegrini VD. A comparison of the vastus splitting and median parapatellar approaches in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1999;367:107–116. 19. White RE, Allman JK, Trauger JA, Dales BH. Clinical comparison of the midvastus and medial parapatellar surgical approaches. Clin Orthop. 1999;367:117–122. 20. Engh GA, Parks NL. Surgical technique of the midvastus arthrotomy. Clin Orthop. 1998;351:270–274. 21. Keating EM, Faris PM, Meding JB, Ritter MA. Comparison of the midvastus muscle-splitting approach with the median parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1999;14:29–32. 22. Bramlett KW. The Trivector Arthrotomy Approach. AAOS Instructional Videotape. 1994, June. 23. Cameron HU, Fedorkow DM. The patella in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1982;165:197–199. 24. Keblish PA. The lateral approach to the valgus knee. Surgical technique and analysis of 53 cases with over two year followup evaluation. Clin Orthopaed Relat Res. 1991;271:52–62. 25. Keblish PA. The lateral approach for total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2003;16:62–68. 26. Buechel FF. Lateral Approach. Master Technique in Orthopedic Surgery: Knee Arthroplasty. New York: Raven Press; 1995:25–39. 27. Keblish PA. Valgus deformity in total knee arthroplasty: the lateral retinacular approach. Orthop Trans. 1985;9:28–39. 28. Coonse K, Adams JD. A new operative approach to the knee joint. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1943;77:344. 29. Windsor RE, Insall JN. Exposure in revision total knee arthroplasty: the femoral peel. Tech Orthop. 1988;3:1. 30. Trousdale RT, Hanssen AD, Rand JA. V-Y quadricepsplasty in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;286:48. 31. Smith PN, Parker DA, Gelinas J. Radiographic changes in the patella following quadriceps turndown for revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2004;19:714. 32. Insall JN, Thompson FM, Brause BD. Two-stage reimplantation for the salvage of infected total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. 1983;65:1087–1098. 33. Meek RM, Greidanus NV, McGraw RW. The extensile rectus snip exposure in revision of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. 2003;85:1120–1131.
journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma 7 (2016) 71–79
34. Dolin MG. Osteotomy of the tibial tubercle in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg. 1983;65: 704–714. 35. Whiteside LA, Ohl MD. Tibial tubercle osteotomy for exposure of the difficult total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;260:6. 36. Barrack RL, Smith P, Munn B. Comparison of surgical approaches in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;356:16. 37. Repicci JA, Eberle RW. Minimally invasive surgical technique for unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J South Orthop Assoc. 1999;8:20–27.
79
38. Bonutti PM. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty – midvastus approach. J Arthroplasty. 2004;43:139–145. 39. Bonutti PM, Mont MA, Kester MA. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004;35:217–226. 40. Chauhan SK. Computer-assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. J Joint Arthroplast. 2004;45:216–225. 41. Rosenberg AG. How should we teach MSI? In: Hozack WJ, Krismer M, Nogler M, eds. et al. In: Minimally Invasive Total Joint Arthroplasty. Heidelberg: Springer; 2004:329–332. 42. DiGioia AM, Blendea S, Jaramaz B. Computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery: minimally invasive hip and knee reconstruction. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004;35:183–189.
