THE MODERN TREATMENT OF

FRACTURES. In

few,

if any,

there been

so

departments of surgery lias important an advance of late years,

in the treatment of fractures.

as

Complete

immobilisation have given place to the judicious use of massage, and early movement of the injured limb. Prior to the introduc-

and

prolonged

tion of the modern method of treatment, the orthodox procedure consisted in fixing the limb in some rigid apparatus, in which it remained

imprisoned weeks.

period varying from five to six said to depend upon a was of rigidity in the apparatus, degree for

a

Success

maximum and

a minimum amount of interference 011 the of the surgeon. Even in the latest edition part when of Esmarch's surgery, we are told that the less once a fractured limb has been put up "

it is disturbed the better. No good can possibly come from meddling with it." It is true that a few surgeons, amongst whom was the late Mr. of

Spence, recognised passive

movement

that

was

a

certain amount

necessary to prevent d

294

THE INDIAN MEDICAL GAZETTE.

and adhesions of tendons, but even those who advocated this treatment, did not consider it justifiable to commence such move-

thickening

ments until

an

advanced

in the treatment

period

of the case; four weeks for of the forearm.

example

in the

of inflammatory effusion is a few

commenced within of the The

principles

treatment

That the results obtained by this old method of treatment are often very unsatisfactory is admitted by all. In many cases after the splints have been removed, farther and prolonged treatment by passive movements, friction, and douches is required, before the functions

set at rest

are

restored to

healthy

a

state.

In

of workmen and others dependent on their own exertions, for the support of themselves and their families, the necessity for such

the

case

treatment is a grave matter, and any will curtail this period of enforcewhich method be welcomed by all surgeons. must ed idleness

prolonged

remember the time when sprains, ?like fractures were treated by prolonged rest. It was only the triumphs of bone-setters over Most of

orthodox

us

practitioners that ultimately drove adopt a more rational method of

surgeons to treatment. The

change

the method of

in

and cannot be said the

approbation

ever

slowly even

yet

of the entire

that may be,

ever

treating fracsprains,

than that of to

have

received

profession.

since the

new

How-

method of

dealing with fractures by means of massage, and passive movements was so strongly advocated by Lucas Championierre, a few years ao-o, this treatment has been carried out by a great number of surgeons, all cf whom have reported well of the method. It was formerly laid down as necessary in the of the limbs that the case of many fractures and below the seat above joints immediately of fracture should be fixed in such a manner that

movement

of these

joints could be the whole period of treatment The result of this procedure was to produce no

carried

out

during

many instances, great stiffness, more especially in those cases in which the fracture was to one of the joints. The fate of in in

proximity

the muscles was still worse than that of the became in all cases disabled joints, for the former of result matting together by inflamas the

matory effusion, and by wasting from pressure and disuse. Under the new method of treatment, stiffness of the

passive

joints

is

prevented by early rapid absorption

movements, whilst the

promoted by massage days of the receipt

which underlie this method of

sound, that they are not liable to be challenged seriously by any one. The only questions which have arisen are, firstly, whether such treatment is likely to interfere with the process of union, and secondly, the applicability of the procedure to all varieties are so

of fracture.

by

The first of these doubts has been So far from

the results of practice.

union the method, if efficiently carried to hasten consolidation of the callus, and to promote bony union of the fragments. As

hindering out, tend-s

the second question experience has shown that there are few, if any, fractures in which this

regards

treatment cannot be carried out without

although according

the

procedure requires

benefit,

to be modified

to the circumstances of each

In case. of transverse fracture, or others, in which there is little or no tendency to displacement, once reduction has been effected, passive movecases

be commenced within a few days receipt of injury; but in those cases in

ments may

of the

tures has come more

1898.

injury.

case

of the limb

[August

which

is

the

a

difficulty fragments in

to be deferred to

a

experienced position, the

later

in

maintaining

treatment has

period^ Massage,

on

the

may be commenced almost at once in all cases. During the first weelc it may be practised without removing the splints over other

that

hand,

portion

of the limb

which remains

un-

covered. The practice of early massage not only produces the results mentioned above, but also relieves pain, and the sensation of tension in the pare. Excellent as this method appears to be, it requires to be carried out with care and

intelligence. Unless can be secured, this

attempted.

these essential conditions treatment should not be

The Modern Treatment of Fractures.

The Modern Treatment of Fractures. - PDF Download Free
2MB Sizes 3 Downloads 4 Views