Vol. 185, No. 3, 1992 June
30,
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS Pages
1992
THE PHOSPHATE
GROUPS OF THE HIGH MOBILITY Pl STRENGTHENS
Anne Carine Ostvold”‘“, aNeurochemical
Laboratory,
1091-l
097
GROUP LIKE PROTEIN
ITS AFFINITY FOR DNA
lngunn Hullsteinb
and S&fen G. Lalandb
Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo,Norway
bDepartment
of Biochemistry,
University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
Received May 11, 1992
SUMMARY: PCA soluble proteins isolated from rat liver and proliferating HeLa interphase cells were subjected to chromatography on columns containing immobilized s.s and d.s. DNA. Pi from rat liver was eluted from S.S. and d.s. DNA between 0,20 and 0,45 M NaCI, while dephosphorylated Pl was not retained by S.S. and d.s. DNA columns at 0,25 M, suggesting that phosphate groups enhance the affinity of Pl for DNA. Pl from proliferating HeLa interphase cells exhbit increased affinty for d.s. as well as S.S. DNA when compared to rat liver Pl . The higher extent of phosphorylation in proliferating cells supports the finding that phosphate enhances rather than redu0 1992 Academic PESS, 1°C. ces the affinity of Pl for DNA.
It is now established
that higher eukaryotic cells contain a set of HMG like proteins ( 1,2,3 )
closely related to those described by Johns et.al. ( 4,5 ). The highly phosphorylated Pl has an amino acid composition Nucleolin is a phosphoprotein phosphorylated
nucleolin
which resembles that of HMG 1,2 as well as nucleolin
in vivo, and active rRNA transcription
horylated by CK-2 in situ. As judged by phosphopeptide additional Pl
phosphorylation
is phosphorylated
is correlated
( 8,9 ). In growing cells both Pl ( 10 ) and nucleolin
seems to be mainly phosphorylated
nuclear protein ( 2,6,7 ).
to highly ( 8,ll
) are phosp-
maps, Pl from in vivo labelled hepatocytes
by CK-2 while Pl from proliferating
HeLa cells has
SeVeral
sites in vivo ( 12 )
by protein kinase C, CaM kinase II and protein kinase A in vitro ( 13 ). Both
nucleolin and Pl are further modlfied in mitosis, and both proteins are substrates for p34 cdmkinase in vitro and in vivo ( 12,14 ). HMG 1,2 exhibit preferential
binding to s.s DNA
( 15 ) while nucleolin binds exclusively to
s.s.DNA in vitro ( 16 ). The present study has examined whether Pl binds to s.s or d.s DNA and to *To whom correspondence should be addressed at University of Oslo, Neurochemical Laboratory, P.O. Box 1115, Blindern 0316, Oslo 3, Norway. Abbreviations used: PCA, perchloric acid, TCA, trichloroacetic acid, S.S. DNA , single stranded DNA, d.s. DNA , double stranded DNA , HMG, high mobility group, CaM kinase II, calcium / calmodulin kinase II CK-2, casein kinase 2. 0006-291X/92
1091
$4.00
Copyright 0 1992 by Academic Press, Inc. All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.
Vol.
185, No. 3, 1992
what extent phosphorylation
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
affects this binding. In addition to DNA binding domains, HMG 1,2 and
nucleolin also consist of highly acidic stretches which can be considered for histones or other basic non histone chromatin
proteins, modulating
as potential binding domains their physiological
function. In
order to investigate whether Hl or other PCA soluble proteins influence the affinity of Pl for DNA, both purified Pi and PCA extracted proteins were subjected to chromatography
MATERIALS
on immobilized
DNA.
AND METHODS
Materials : Single stranded DNA Sepharose was purchased from Bethesda Research Laboratory while double stranded DNA cellulose was obtained from Pharmasia. 32P ( orthophosphate ) was from the Institute of Energy Technology ( Kjeller, Norway ). E.Coli phosphatase ( type Ill R ), protamine hydrochloride and phenylmethylsulphonylfluoride were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. Single stranded spesific S, nuclease was purchased from Amersham. Cell culture and radiolabellina: HeLa cells were grown and labelled as described previously Preparation of perchforic acid extracts: Extraction of tissues and cells were carried out as in ( 2 ). Phosphatase treatment of perchloric acid extracted proteins: Phosphatase ( Ptase ) treatment of extracted proteins was carried out as in ( 2 ). Purification of Pl: PCA extracted proteins were dissolved in water ( 10 mg / ml ) and protamine hydrochloride dissolved in water ( 1 rng I ml ) was added to a final concentration of 0,2 mg / ml. The pH was adjusted to 8,0 by addition of 05 M Tris HCI pH 8,0. The precipitate formed was washed with acetone I 0,l N HCI ( 1:8 ) and finally acetone. Pi was separated from protamine by preparative acetic acid-urea gel electrophoresis as described in ( 2 ). Western immunoblottina: This was carried out as in ( 21 ). Affinity purified anti rat Pl raised in rabbis was used Chrornatoaraphv on S.S. DNA aqarose: DNA agarose containing 05 - 1 ,O mg calf thymus single Stranded DNA per ml agarose was packed in a column ( diameter 0.6 cm, bight 22 cm ) and washed with 1 ,O mM Tris HCI pH 75. The column was equilibrated with 1 ,O mM Tris HCI / 0,05 M NaCI, and the applied proteins were dissolved in the same buffer. The column was then washed with 15 ml 1,O mM Tris HCI I 0.2 M NaCl before elution of the proteins with 50 ml of a linear gradient from 0,2 - 0,6 M NaCl in 1 ,O mM Tris HCI pH 7,5 at a flow rate of 0,4 ml per min. and a fraction volume of I ml. The column was subsequently washed with 15 ml 1 ,O mM Tris HCI / 2M NaCI. The conductivity in each fraction was measured with a conductivity meter, Radiometer/Copenhagen. Proteins in 5 ml pooled fractions were precipitated with TCA (25 % final concentration) and analysed by SDS I 15% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis according to Laemmli ( 17 ). ChromatOoraDhv on d. s. DNA cellulose: DNA cellulose containing 1 ,S mg native calf thymus DNA per ml cellulose was treated with single-stranded DNA spesific S, nuclease according to lsackson et al. ( 15 ). The column had a diameter of 0,6 cm and the hight was 8 cm. The column was washed with 1 ,O mM Tris HCI pH 7.5 and the applied proteins was dissolved in the same buffer. The column was washed with 1Oml 1 ,0 mM Tris HCI / 0,05M NaCI, and the proteins eluted with 50 ml of a linear gradient from 0,05 - 0,6M NaCl in 1OmM Tris HCI pH 7.5 at a flow rate of 5 ml per hour and a fraction volume of 1 ,O ml. The column was subsequently washed with 15 ml ml 1 ,O mM Tris HCI / 2M NaCl The fractions was analysed as described for s.s DNA chromatography.
RESULTS Purified Pl from rat liver was subjected to colums containing
immobilized s.s and d.s DNA respectively.
The eluted fractions were analyzed by Western immunoblotting phoresis. As seen in Fig.1 purified Pl was eluted from
gel electro-
s.s DNA colums between 0,20 and 0,45 M
NaCI. This was also the case with d.s. DNA ( not shown ). 1092
after SDS polyacrylamide
Vol.
No. 3, 1992
185,
BIOCHEMICAL
a
b
AND BIOPHYSICAL
d
c
Fig. Western lmmunobiots of purified Pl column with a linear salt gradient from 0,20 to were separated by SDS gel electrophoresis and 2pg purified Pi (a) material not attached at 0,05 0,35 M (e), 0,40 M (f), 0,45 M (g).
PCA extracts from mammalian
cells contain in addition to Hl and Pl the high mobility
( HMG ) proteins and some minor protein components.
and 04
S.S. DNA.
efg
from rat liver eiuted from a s.s DNA agarose 0,60 M NaCi . The proteins in 5ml pooled tractions probed with anti PI antibodies. M NaCl (b), Pl eluted at 0,20 M (c), 0,25 M (d),
DNA binding capacity of Pl , PCA soluble proteins containing
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
To investigate a possible effect of Hl on the
from rat liver were fractionated
As seen in Fig. 2 , PCA solubilized
group
on a colum
Pl from rat liver was eluted between
0,20
M as was the case with purified Pi. Hence the presence of Hl or the other PCA soluble
proteins did not affect the affinity of Pl for S.S. DNA.
a
bcdef
9
h
0.7 I 0.6 *
0,5
z a
0.4, 0.3
02
: t
t
0.1 t 5 1015202530254D455D556065 Fraction
number
Fia. Eiution profile of PCA soluble proteins from rat liver eiutsd from a S.S. DNA agarose column with a linear salt gradient from 0,20 to 0,60 M . Western lmmunobiots of the eiuted proteinsseparated by SDS gel eiectrophoresis and probed with anti Pl antibodies are shown at the top. PCA extracted proteins from rat liver (a), proteins eluted at 0,20 M (b), 0.35 M (c), 646 M (d), 045 M (e), 0,50 M (f), 0,60 M (g), 2pg Pl standard (h).
1093
Vol.
185, No. 3, 1882
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
E.Coli Ptase dP1 Hl
g h i i kl abc d ef w. A Coomassie stained SDS polyacrylamlde gel of protein fraCtiOnS obtained when fractlonatlng dephosphotylated PCA soluble proteins on s.s DNA agarose as in Fig. 1. Dephosphorylated PCA extract from rat liver (a): proteins not attached at 0,05 M NaCl (b), proteins eluted at 0,20 M (c), 0,24 M (d), 0,28 M (e), 0,31 M (f), 0,39 M (g), 0,43 M (h), 0,47 M (i), 0,51 M (j), 055 M (k), 0,60 M (I).
It has been shown that Pl probably consists of a population different degrees ( 2 ). Dephoshorylation
by alkaline phosphatase
of molecules phosphorylated
to
removes all the phosphate groups
which have been shown to be linked to serine and threonine. To examine the effect of the phosphate groups on the affinity of Pl for DNA, a PCA extract from rat liver was treated with alkaline phosphatase prior to to chromatography
on S.S. and d.s. DNA columns. It is seen from Fig. 3 that dephosphorylated
Pl was not retained by the s.s column at 0,25 M NaCI, indicating that the prescence of phosphate groups enhances the affinity of Pl for S.S. DNA. A similar result was found for d.s. DNA ( results not shown ) Since Pl in proliferating cells is phosphorylated
to a greater extent than Pl from non proliferating
Cells as judged by the number of phosphopeptides rat hepatocytes and proliferating from proliferating
in thermolytic peptide
maps from in vivo labelled
HeLa cells ( 12 ) , it seemed of interest to compare the affinty of Pl
cells and rat liver for DNA.
labelled in vivo with with =P-phosphate
PCA soluble proteins from proliferating
were fractionated
on the S.S. DNA column.
HeLa
cells
As seen in Fig.4
Pl from HeLa cells was eluted from the S.S. DNA column between 0,22 and 0,60 M NaCI. In contrast to Pl from rat liver, a subfraction
remained bound
at 0,60 M and was subsequently
NaCI. When PCA soluble proteins from HeLa interphase
a d.s. DNA column, and the collected fractions probed with anti Pl antibodies, eluted within the same range of salt concentration
eluted at 2,0 M
cells were subjected to chromatography
as for the S.S. DNA column
on
Pl was found to be ( Fig. 5 )
DISCUSSION Protein Pl is a nuclear protein present in all mammalian a HMG like protein and has also many properties
species and cell types examined so far. It is
in common with nucleolin. 1094
Vol.
BIOCHEMICAL
185, No. 3, 1992
AND BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
M.W
Pl Hl
a
h
bcdefg
i
jklmn
m Autoradiogram of a SDS polyacrylamide gel of protein fractions obtaineo when fractbnatlng PCA soluble proteins from HeLa cells labelled In vlvo wlth 32P and on a S.S. DNA agams Proteins
COlUlllll.
The proteins
were
eluted
as in Fig.1,
Material
not attached
at 0,05 M NaCl (a),
eluted at 0120 M (b), 0,21 M (c), 0,25 M (d), 0,28 M (e), 0,32 M (1) 0,37 M (g), 0,41 M (h), 0,45 M 0) 050 M (j), 0,56 M (k), 0,60 M (I) 0,60 M (m), 2,0 M NaCl (n).
Thermolytic
peptide maps of Pl from , rat liver, calf liver, pig liver and HeLa cells imply a high
degree of homology in Pl from different species ( 21 ). Pl is a phosphoprotein of phosphotylation erating
and the pattern of thermolytic phosphopeptides
Cells, cells in log phase growth
phosphorylation
and metaphase
varies when comparing
arrested
cells ( 12 ).
pattern in Pl may reflect different functions in proliferating
and may also explain the differences
in vivo but the degree non prolif-
The different
and non proliferating
cells,
in the affinity of Pl for both S.S. and d.s. DNA when comparing
Pl in PCA extracts from rat liver and HeLa cells. It might also explain the broad elution profile of Pl when compared to other proteins present in the PCA extract. Since dephosphorylation in a crude PCA extract dramatically decreases
the affinity of Pl for DNA while the binding of Hl ( Fig.2
and 3 ) is not affected, the DNA binding can not be solely due to electrostatic basic regions in Pl and the anionic phosphate
backbone
In contrast to HMG I ( 22 ) and probably poly dA - poly dT
( unpublished
of the proteins
nucleolin
interactions
between
of DNA. ( 23 ). Pl does not bind preferentially
results ). Purified Pl from rat liver does not introduce chromatin
*
Pl abcdef
ghijk
I
m western lmmunobbts of a SDS polyacrylamide gel of protein fractions obtained when fractionating PCA soluble proteins from prollferatlng HeLa cells on d.s. DNA cellulose. The proteins were eluted with a salt gradient from 0,05 - 0,60 M NaCl and oroteins in 5ml pooled fractions Separated
to
by SDS gel electrophoresis.
Proteins
not attached
at 0,05 M NaCl
(a),
proteins
eluted
0.07 M (b), 0,12 M(c), 0,17 M (d), 0,23 M (e), 0.28 M (f), 0,34 M (g), 0,38 M (h), 044 M (i), 0,53 M (j), 0,60 M (k), 2,0 M NaCl (I).
1095
at
Vol.
BIOCHEMICAL
185, No. 3, 1992
condensation nucleosome
when microinjected assembley
AND BIOPHYSICAL
into starfish oocytes ( unpublished
( D.Tremethick,
personal
communication
proteins have been shown to be highly phosphorylated probably
regulated
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
data ) and Pl has no effect on ). Several transcriptional
( 24,25 ) . The bioactivity of these factors iS
by multiple kinases in vivo ( 26 ). Sequence
specific DNA binding by a bovine
testes ATF / CRE binding factor is dependent
on the level of phosphorylation.
when the natural protein is dephosphorylated
or when it is hyperphosphorylated
in vitro ( 27 ). The effect of Pl on transcription The broad elution heterogenous sequences
in DNA.
and replication
The binding is reduced
population
by protein kinase A
has however not yet been tested
profile of Pl from both S.S. and d.s. DNA columns
phosphorylated
activator
might be due to a
of Pl molecules or that Pl has different affinity
Pl might also be part of a heterodimer
for
different
or multimer complex in vivo and hence
difficult to test by employing in vitro systems. The findings that Pl is a substrate for several kinases in vivo and in vitro, and that it remains bound to DNA at physiological highly regulated
ionic strength, indicate however a
nuclear function in vivo.
REFERENCES 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22.
Lund, T. , Holtlund, J. , Fredriksen, M. and Laland, S.G. ( 1983 ), FEBS Lett. 152, 163 - 167. 0stvold, A.C. , Holtlund. J. and Laland S.G. ( 1985 ) Eur. J. Biochem. 153, 469 - 475. Rodriguez-Alfageme, C. , Rudkin, G.T. and Cohen, L.H. ( 1980 ) Chromosoma 78, 1 - 31. Johns, E. W. ( 1982 ) in The HMG chromosomal proteins ( Johns, E.W., ed. ) pp 1 - 9 , Academic press, New York Goodwin, G.H. and Johns, E.W. ( 1982 ) in Chromosomal non histone proteins - biochemistry and biology, vol. 2 ( Hnilica, L. , ed. ) pp 69 - 91 , CRC Press, Florida Walker, J. M. , Gooderham, K., Hastings, J.R.B. , Mayes, E. and Johns, E.W. ( 1980 ) FEBS Lett. 122, 264 - 270. Lapeyre, B. , Bourbon, H. and Amalric, F. ( 1987 ) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA , 84 , 1472 - 1476. Belenguer, P., Baldin, V., Mathieu, C. Prats, H., Bensaid, M., Bouche, G. and Amalric, F. ( 1989 Nucleic Acids Res. 17, 6625 - 6635. Suzuki, N, Matusi, H. and Hosoya, T. ( 1985 ) J. Biol. Chem. 260,805O - 8055. Maelandsmo, G., 0stvold, AC. and Laland, S.G. ( 1989 ) Eur. J. Biochem. 196 , 557 - 567. Caizergues-Ferrer, M., Belenguer, P., Lapeyere, B., Amalric, F., Wallace, M.O. and Olson , M.O.J.( 1987 ) Biochemistry 26, 7876 - 7883. Mejer, L., Ostvold, A.C., Walaas, S.I., Lund, T. and Laland , S.G. ( 1991 ) Eur. J. Blochem. 196, 557 - 567. Walaas, S.I., Ostvold, A.C. and Laland, S.G. ( 1989 ) FEBS Lett. 258 , 106 - 108. Belenguer, P., Caizergues-Ferrer, M., Labbe, J.C., Doree, M. and Amalric, F. ( 1990 ) Mol. Cell. Biol. 10 , 3607 - 3618. Isa&son, P.J., Fishback, L.J., Bidney, D.L. and Reeck, G.R. ( 1979 ) J. Biol. Chem. 254, 5569 - 5572. SappM., Richter, A., Weisshan, K.,Caizergues-Ferrer, M., Amalric,F.,Wallace, M.O., Kirstein, M.N. and Olson, M.O.J. ( 1989 ) Eur. J. Biochem. 179, 541 - 548. Laemmli, U.K. ( 1970 ) Nature 227, 680 - 685. Erard, M, , Belenguer, P. , Caizergues-Ferrer, M., Pantaloni, A. and Amalric, F. ( 1988 ) Eur. J. B&hem. 175 , 525 - 530. Kharrat, A. , Derancourt, J., Doree, M., Amalric, F. and Erard, M. , Biochemistry, in press Bradbury, M., Inglis, R., Matthevs, H. and Sarner, N. ( 1973 ) Eur. J. Biochem. 33,131 - 139. 0stvofd, A.C., Haddeland, U. and Laland, S.G. ( 1990 ) Biochem. Int. 20,991 - 1000. Karlson, J.R. , Merk, E. , Holtlund, J. , Laland, S.G. and Lund, T. ( 1989 ) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Corn. 158, 646 - 651. 1096
Vol.
23. 24. 25. 26. 27.
185, No. 3, 1992
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Olson, M.O.J.,Thompson, B.A., Rivers, Z.M., Kao, N.Y. and Case, S.T. ( 1983 ) Biochem. 22 ,3345 - 3351. Luther, B. , Christenson, E., Liichfield, D. , Krebs, E. and Eisenman, R. ( 1990 ) Nature 344, 517 - 521. Yamamoto, K.K. , Gonzalez, G.A. , Menzel, P. , Rivier, J. and Montminy, M.R. ( 1990 ) Cell 60, 611 - 617. Gonzalez, G.A. , Yamamoto, K.K. , Fisher, W.H. , Karr, D., Menzel, P. , Biggs Ill, W. , Vale, W.W. and Montminy, M.R. ( 1989 ) Nature 337,749 - 753. Englander, E.W., Widen, S.G. and Wilson, S.H. ( 1991 ) Nucleic Acids Research 19 , 3369 - 3375.
1097