VIEWPOINT The Role of Preventive Dalmas
Medicine in Developing
A.R.
Dominicus,
and Takashi
Countries
Akamatsul)
Universityof Daressalaam,Schoolof Medicine,Tanzaniaand Departmentof PublicHealth,Schoolof Medicine, Universityof Kyorin,Tokyo), Japan (Received for publication on June 9, 1990)
Abstract.
In trying
to demonstrate
the importance
of preventive
medicine
in health
care
previous studies involving prevention and control of diseases have been discussed. Preventive also urged as the best method to help promoting health especially in the developing countries. countries
are urged
In terms
of cost analysis
to support
mortality
and/or
something
today in order
developing
prevention
morbidity,
countries,
materially
is an investment
therefore,
we,
investors
and financially
in health in the
that
in promoting
produce
developing
a reduced
countries,
promotion, medicine is Developed their
health.
probability
have
to gain a benefit at a later point in time. (Keio J Med 39 (4): 265-269,
of
to sacrifice December
1990)
Key words:
disease prevention,
cancer
screening,
infectious
Introduction
赤松
control
(application). Preventive medicine necessitates a systematic way of studying both the patterns of occurrence of disease in a community and the patterns of delivery of medical care, since offered services influence and also are influenced by the nature of disease and by the changes in modes of therapy. This systematic approach is provided by epi demiology, which forms the basic science of preventive medicine. It is understood that preventing illness and promoting health are functions of all medicine, therefore, preventive medicine represents a composite rather than a unitary body of knowledge. While in practice specific measures continue to occupy a central part in preventive medicine, general preventive measures have long been known to be very important. The successful application of both specific and general measures requires the effort of health education in order to achieve the cooperation of those people who comprise the community .3,4 There are two important objectives of preventive medicine; to prolong life, and to reduce disability. In the developed countries progress in achieving the first objec tive has been enormous due to social and economic changes that have resulted in better nutrition , smaller f amilies, better education, and the increase in medical knowledge that has enabled many diseases to be cured and prevented. It is at this point that we think developed countries, because of previous experience in solving
In the words of the noted medical historian, Henry Sigerist:1 Medicine, by promoting health and preventing illness, endeavors to keep individuals adjusted to their environment as useful and contented members of society, or by restoring health and rehabilitating the former patient it endeavors to readjust individuals to their environment. This idea conforms very well with the present concepts of preventive medicine (preventing ill ness and promoting health). In preventive medicine the community replaces the individual patient, as the primary focus of concern. In preventive medicine the objective is to evaluate the health of a defined community, including those members who would benefit but do not seek medical care. In this article, we intend to discuss the most important appli cations and cost effectiveness of preventive medicine in health promotion especiallyfor the interest of developing countries. Health problems in the developing countries are caused by many factors.2 That is, the majority of the people in these countries have low incomes, insufficient food, poor sanitation, poor access to safe water (treated tap water) and high population growth rate. We there fore strongly believe that the only way in which develop ing countries can effectively solve health problems facing them is through preventive medicine practice Reprint Uehara,
diseases
隆 requests to: Dr. Dalmas A.R. Dominicus Department Nishihara-cho, Nakagami-gun Okinawa 903-01, Japan
of Preventive
265
Medicine,
School
of Medicine
University
of the
Ryukyus
207
266
their
Dalmas
health
problems,
can help
a lot in improving
health
A .R. Dominicus,
et al.: Perspectives
of Preventive
Medicine
parties (administrators) who provide the investment capital are being sceptical of the idea of prevention as an investment for health care cost containment? There are several reasons. First, prevention is an investment which The Importance of Preventive Medicine first increases costs. Second, preventive measures usually in Disease Prevention cannot prevent morbidity and mortality from occurring, Economic aspect but what they can do is to postpone both morbidity and mortality. For example the studies of the consequences The main objective of economic analysis is not only to of reduced smoking by Leu and Schaub11show that life estimate the economic consequences of preeeeequences ofpreeeeeeeentive pro time health care expenditure of non-smokers are not less grammes (their costs and benefits) but also to contribute than those of smokers. However what we should all to an understanding of individual and collective choice in remember is the general lack of data about health care allocating resources to prevention. As a discipline econ expenditure over the life-time and we have also to remind omics deals with choices between alternative ways of ourselves, as Warner12 emphasizes, that postponding allocating resources. It is the characterization of the costs is also a means of containing costs. Third, and situation in which the decision has to be made that is perhaps most important, international and inter-regional most important, and the distinction between economic comparison shows that the level of health-care expendi and non-economic factors is secondary. The basic dis ture is not at all related to the health of the population.13 tinction between prevention and other health measures In the developing countries for example, health of the in terms of economic analysis is the timing of costs and people is still not satisfactory, but at the same time they benefits. From an economic point of view prevention is are the people getting the least in terms of health-care an investment that produces a reduced probability of expenditure. It is at this point that we feel that the mortality and or morbidity.5 The economic concept of developed countries through WHO or otherwise are to investment, means that the investor has to sacrifice assist the developing countries in promoting their health something today in order to gain a benefit at a later point status in terms of financial, material and manpower in time. Therefore for investment cost will always come support. before benefit in time. Costs are not only more immediate We think that it is hardly meaningful to try to general than benefits, but they are also more certain. It is always ize about empirical cost benefit, cost effectiveness and true that with investment we do not usually with certainity cost containment studies of preventive measures. For know what the benefit will be later in time. We can only example, if we take immunization programmes, you will receive the benefit with a certain probability. Now, when find those which produce benefit in excess of costs as well as those where the opposite is true. You will find screen in practice can we apply the economic theory of invest ment in preventive medicine? The economic theory of ing projects which are cost effective if they are applied to investment is obviously relevant for the analysis of one part of the population but not if they are extended to other groups. Some programmes are cost effective at one choices between alternative preventive programmes, be tween alternative designs of preventive programmes and point in time but not at later one. Mass screening for between the prevention and treatment of a particular tuberculosis might serve as the best example.9 Also there disease. This simply means that prevention and the will be some programmes for life style changes that economic concept of investment has to be developed reduce health care expenditures and others that increase with care. The aim of prevention is not primarily the them. An important point is to try to do the right thing at the right time and place. It is our personal believes that if monetary returns on invested capital and that the re sources spent on prevention are not only financial. The this is done correctly in the long run everybody will economic analysis of preventive measure as investments eventually benefit from a sound economic appraisal in therefore must include a careful assessment of costs and health care. benefits from a wider social perspective. Having this in mind we can use most of concepts, theories and methods Screeningfor genetic disease developed for the economic analysis of investment de Genetic diseases and congenital malformations are cisions for studies of the value of preventive medicine. 6-9 Preventive measures not only affect a person's health in important causes of neonatal and childhood diseases in the future (as understood generally) but could also affect the developed countries.14In many developing countries his or her future health care expenditure and future where single gene disorders occur at a particular high frequency as a result of natural selection, an even greater income in terms of production. The possibility of pre vention as a measure for containing health expenditure health burden will be caused by genetic diseases once the has been discussed in many previous studies.7,10What high mortality rates in early life due to malnutrition and are the reasons why some people especially the third infection are reduced .2,1The prevention of genetic dissituations
in the
developing
countries.
Keio J Med 39 (4): 265-269,
1990
267
eases prospectively (genetic counselling) entails screen ing large population for genetic diseases and then offering appropriate advice about marriage. Retrospectively, genetic counselling after the birth of an affected child has only a limited effect on the incidence of a genetic disease. Generally, programmes for preventing genetic diseases involve antenatal or neonatal screening for common dis eases. For instance antenatal screening is reserved for conditions which are either preventable, such as rhesus haemolytic disease, or are of such severity that there is an indication for termination of pregnancy, such as Down syndrome, neural tube defects, certain haemolytic dis orders and variety of rare metabolic disorders. Neonatal screening on the other hand is restricted to conditions for which there are useful treatments, such as hypothy roidism, phenylketonuria and sickle cell anaemia.16-18 Genetic screening is relatively expensive. However, it is very effective in reducing morbidity and mortality in the communities. Unless the gene probe technology is con siderably simplified and its cost reduced, this approach will not be widely applicable in rural population in the developing countries where rural infrastructures are still very poor.19This is the major challenge for the control of genetic diseases in the developing countries into which the developed countries must give a hand to its solution. Screening for cancer and coronary heart diseases The
ability
to identify
carcinoma
methods
led to the plausible
tion
treatment
and
vasive
cancer.
find cancers
signs
finding
them
20 The
cancers
more
cure.
Shapiro
from
under
by Baker.22
One
examination
a statistically
the colon
for
cancer
lung
is not
cytology.24,25
It has
enabling seems should given
rate
to be be
necessary
a very
of was trial
sigmoidoscopy in cancer trial
that
chest
of
involving
screening
for
x-ray
and sputum
that
endometrial
shown
in asymptomatic
cure
of
this
adults valuable
support
delivered reduce
control
rigid control
encouraged
a
breast
effectiveness
reduction
of
a
of
age of 50 years
indicates been
years
randomized
asymptomatic
also
that
and
using
makes
patient
noticed
can be detected
high
therefore countries,
also
and its precursors Screening
which
cancer effective
cancer.26
the
chance
The
Randomized
being
greater
the
significant
mortality.23
screening
women
cancer.
waited
history
and mammography under the age of 50
in women
digital
suggested
cancer
co-authors21
breast
also suggested
patient
giving
and
in is to
assumption
natural
to treatment
detec
prevent
screening
if the the
in their
of survival and
mammography involving
than and
early
might
of cancer
stage
earlier
examination to women
mortality
lung
purpose
amenable
probability
that
condition
or symptoms,
higher
physical annually
this
in an earlier
for overt that
of
in situ by cytological
suggestion
in and
particular for
health the
cancer activity
developing
assistance.
There is no dispute about the importance of hyper tension and ischaemic heart disease in the developed communities. Early attempts to study the impact of lowering diastolic pressure in the ranges of 90-114 mmHg and 115-129 mmHg were done by two Veterans Administration (VA) Cooperative Study Groups.27,28In these two studies the benefits were due to reduction in the frequency of stroke, heart failure, and renal failure. The results of the VA studies, coupled with those of other studies led to the more or less mandatory treatment of those with sustained diastolic pressure of 115 mmHg or more.29 The main predictors of IHD (ischaemic heart disease) other than sex, and increase in age are hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia and ciga rrete smoking. One view emphasizes the need for a downward shift in the blood cholesterol level for the community as a whole.30This shift of course will depend on successful health education and dietary changes and not a question of screening. The other view is that evidence in favour of the community approach to the prevention of IHD by dietary means is not sufficiently strong and that intervention should be confined to those at a particular high risk.31 The Oslo trial showed a significant reduction in IHD events in the group en couraged to adopt diet rich in polyunsaturated fat and to stop smoking.32The study by Berwick and co-authors33 showed good cost-effectiveness in the questions of methods of preventing IHD by modifying cholesterol levels in children. Screening for cigarette smoking is very discouraging. The effects of increase in price and in detailed informations may not have been well empha sized. At the moment, although cigarette consumption is going down in some countries, worldwide consumption of cigarette is going up. Switching to pipe and cigars smoking, nasal snuffing, chewing and dipping tabacco is not a solution.34 For instance chewing and dipping of tabacco might cause more cases of oral cancer. Alcohol consumption is known to be increasing world-wide. At the same time it was noted earlier that alcohol related disabilities were increasing.35 Therefore alcohol related diseases seem imperative to be included in the spectrum of conditions over which prevention is to be vigorously attempted. Many measures have been suggested for screening for alcoholism.36However, questionaires have been reported to be better than biochemical tests at eliciting a true picture of alcohol consumption.37 The results of the controlled intervention trial (alcohol study) showed good results especially in the intervention group.38 Mortality was reduced by almost a half in the intervention group. There was also significantly fewer sick leave days and days in the hospital in the intervention than the control group (most important aspect of preven tion in the control of alcoholism and alcohol related diseases).
268
Dalmas
Immunization and infectious diseases control
13.
A. R. Dominicus,
Forty-first 2000:
Prevention of infectious diseases by vaccination has been one of the major triumphs of medicine (one of the major role played and still being played by preventive aspect of medicine). There have been many previous studies done on different vaccine: for poliomyelitis vaccine,39 for pertussis vaccine,40 for measles vaccine,41,42 for rubella vaccine,42,43 for mumps vaccine,44 and for influenza vaccine.45 These studies consider vaccines' benefits, risks and costs and conclude that these vaccines result in a net savings of morbidity, mortality and cost (money). Studies of the benefits, risks and cost aid in altering or setting health policy. The benefits of smallpox vaccine which helped to eradicate this serious disease with rarity of serious adverse re actions to vaccination,46 caused this procedure of immu nization to be considered of unquestioned value.47 The point of importance to note here is that almost all studies on immunization demonstrated that the benefits out weigh the risks and costs for many vaccines (eg polio, pertussis, measles, mumps, rubella), and their use pro vides a net saving to society. In order to promote health status in the developing countries where infectious dis eases are still the major causes of morbidity and mor ality,
preventive
health
services.
programmes Problems
should facing
be the
developing
priorities
at
1988,
3-157
Weatherall
DJ:
Provincial 15.
YW,
analysis
Kazazian
AK:
analysis Blood
S, Venet
include
malnutrition,
infectious
diseases
and
Baker
23.
24.
poor
sanitation.2 25. References
1. Singerist HE: Primitive and Archaic Medicine. In: A History of Medicine, Vol 1, Oxford University Press, New York, 1951, 3-50 2. Dominicus DAR, Todoriki H, Gunshin H, Akamatsu T: Present health situation in Tanzania. Nippon Koshuu Eisei Gakkai Zasshi (Jpn J Public health) 37: 118-125, 1990 (in Japanese) 3. Wilkinson GS, Mirand EA: An experiment in health education and cancer control. Public Health Rep 91: 218-222, 1976 4. Grover PL, Miller J: Guidelines for making health education work. Public Health Rep 91: 249-253, 1976 5. Mushkin SJ: Health as an investment. J Polit Econ 70: 129-157, 1962 6. Kristein M: Economic issues in prevention. Prev Med 6: 252-264, 1977 7. Drummond MF: Studies in economic appraisal. In: Health Care, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1981, 32-45 8. Susser M: Prevention and cost containment. Bull NY Acad Med 56: 45-52, 1980 9. Fuchs VR: Time preference and health, an exploratory study. In: Economic Aspect of Health, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1982, 93-120 10. Logsdon DN, Rosen MA, Demak MM: The insure project on life cycle, preventive health services, cost containment issues. Inquiry 20: 121-126, 1983 11. Leu RT, Schaub T: Does smoking increase medical care expendi ture? Soc Sci Med 17: 1907-1914, 1983 12. Warner KE: The economic implication of preventive health care. Soc Sci Med 13C: 227-237, 1979
W,
year summary report. Dales LG, Friedman
26.
27.
28.
29. 30.
31. 32.
33.
34.
Breast
health
385-404, Levin
Vol
2,
In:
World
cell
anaemia
TA,
by
1978
Mahoney
MJ, linkage
endonuclease
inherited
Screening,
site.
metabolic Wald
NJ,
ed,
221-238
Health
policy
and
implemen
1989
Principles
Health
Strax
and
Papers
P, Venet
screening
22.
phasic
2000.
34,
practice World
of
screening
Health
Organiz
1968
years effect of 349-355, 1982 LH:
T:
YG:
Public
Vik
1984,
192-200,
Jungner In:
Geneva,
Shapiro
38:
Evalu
year
2: 910-913,
other
Neonatal
Akamatsu
J Med
Africa:
the
restriction
Oxford,
Nuffied
by amniocentesis,
and
and
Press,
DAR,
on
cancer
L, Roeser
breast
cancer
detection
CA GD,
checkups,
R:
Ten
demonstration
32: 194-225, Collen MF:
trial.
JNCI
69:
project,
1982 Evaluating
a controlled
to fourteen
mortality.
five
periodic J
Chronic
multi Dis
32:
1979 ML,
mortality
also
Antenatal
JMG,
Lancet CD,
polymorphic
Phenylketonuria
diseases.
ation,
multiple
for
by
of sickell
cells.
Boehm
year
1-241
of ƒÀ-thalassemia
University
Wilson
JA,
practice.
Situation,
1987,
fluid
GM:
Keio
Health
diagnosis
1980
Dominicus tation.
Phillip
In:
Oxford
21.
Antenal
all
the
Organization,
1-76
Office
for
World
926-930,
Komrower
for
A:
Diagnosis
using 56:
disorders.
20.
the
of amniotic
HH,
Ritchey
19.
on
Geneva,
Dozy
clinical 1982,
Regional health
to
Health
and
London,
Medicine
Alma-ata
World
genetic
for
Organization,
Kan DNA
18.
strategy
Report
Health
17.
new Trusts,
of Preventive
From
mid-point.
Organization
the
Seventh
16.
The
Health of
Assembly:
the
Hospitals
World ation
Health
Reflection
Geneva, 14.
in
countries
World
et al.: Perspectives
Tockman in males
MS, screened
examination,
a preliminary
82:
1982
138-146,
Frost by
chest
report.
JK,
Ball
X-ray Recent
WC: and
Lung
cytologic
Results
Cancer
cancer sputum Res
Muhm JR, Miller WE, Fortana RS, Sanderson DR, Uhlenhopp MA: Lung cancer detected during screening programme using four month chest radiographs. Radiology 148: 609-615, 1983 Vuopala S, Kaupila A, Mikkonen M, Stenbeck F: Screening of asymptomatic postmenopausal women for gynecological malig nancies with special reference to endometrial sampling methods. Arch Gynecol 231: 119-127, 1982 Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group: Effects of treatment on morbidity in hypertension. I. Results in patients with diastolic blood pressure averaging 115 through 129 mmHg. JAMA 203: 1028-1034, 1967 Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group: Effects of treatment on morbidity in hypertension. II. Results in patients with diastolic blood pressure averaging 90 through 114 mmHg. JAMA 213: 114-1152, 1970 Management Committee: The Australian therapeutic trial in mild hypertension. Lancet is 1261-1267, 1980 World Health Organization Expert Committee: Prevention of coronary heart disease. World Health Organization Technical Rep Ser 678, 1982, 5-53 Oliver MF: Should we not forget about mass control of coronary risk factors? Lancet 2: 37-38, 1983 Hjermann 1, Byre KV, Holme I, Leren P: Effect of diety and smoking intervention on the incidence of coronary heart disease. Report from the Oslo Study Group of a randomised trial in healthy men. Lancet 2: 1303-1310, 1981 Berwick DM, Cretin S. Keeler E: Cholesterol, children, and heart disease: An analysis of alternatives. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1980, 3-112 Winn DM, Blot WJ, Shy CM, Pickle LM, Toledo A, Fraumeni JF: Snuff-dipping and oral cancer among women in the Southern
Keio J Med 39 (4): 265-269, 1990
35. 36. 37.
38.
39. 40.
United Moser
States. N Engl J Med 304: 745-749, 1981 J: Prevention of alcohol-related problems;
269
developing
broad-spectrum programme. Br J Addict 74: 133-140, 1979 Lieber CS: A public health strategy against alcoholism and complications. Am J Med 65: 722-726, 1978
measles and rubella ence on Conquest
a its 43.
Bernadt MW, Mumford J, Taylor C, Smith B, Murray RM: Comparison of questionaire and laboratory tests in the detection of excessive drinking and alcoholism. Lancet 1: 325-328, 1982
44.
immunization. In: Proceeding of the Confer of Two Agents that Endanger the Brain:
Measles and Rubella, Gruenberg EM, ed, Oxford University Press, London and New York, 1984, 56-63 Schoenbaun SC, Hyde JN, Bartoshesky L, Crampton K: Benefit cost analysis of mumps rubella vaccination policy. N Engl J Med 294: 306-310, 1976 Koplan JP, Preblund
SR:
A
benefit-cost
analysis
of
mumps
Kristenson H, Ohlin H, Hulten-Nosslin MB, Trell E, Hood B: Identification and intervention of heavy drinking in middle aged men, results and follow up of 24-60 months of long term study
45.
vaccine. Am J Dis Child 136: 362-364, 1982 Klarman HE, Gozick D: Economics of influenza. In: Influenza Virus Vaccines and Strategy, Selby P, ed, Academic Press, New
with randomized controls. Clin Exp Res 7: 203-309, 1983 Weisbrod BA: Costs and benefits of medical research, a case study of poliomyelites. J Polit Econ 79: 527-544, 1971
46.
York, 1976, 255-270 Lane JM, Ruben FL, Abrutyn E, Millar JD: Death attributable to smallpox vaccination, 1959 to 1966 and 1968. JAMA 212:
41.
Koplan JP, Schoenbaum SC, Weinstein MC, Fraser D W: Pertussis vaccine, an analysis of benefits, risks, and costs. N Engl J Med 301: 906-911, 1979 Albritton RB: Cost-benefits of measles eradication. Effects of
42.
a federal intervention. Policy Analysis 4: 1-22, 1978 Koplan JP, White CC: An update on the benefits and
costs
of
47.
441-444, 1970 Fenner F, Henderson pox vaccine programme. Organization,
DA,
Arita
I, Jezek
Z, Ladnyi
ID:
Small
and vaccination in the intensified smallpox eradication In: Smallpox and Its Eradication, World Health Geneva, 1988, 539-592