Accepted Manuscript Thiazolidone derivatives as inhibitors of chikungunya Virus Surender Singh Jadav, Barij Nayan Sinha, Rolf Hilgenfeld, Boris Pastorino, Xavier de Lamballerie, Venkatesan Jayaprakash PII:
S0223-5234(14)00969-6
DOI:
10.1016/j.ejmech.2014.10.042
Reference:
EJMECH 7449
To appear in:
European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Received Date: 1 March 2014 Revised Date:
13 October 2014
Accepted Date: 14 October 2014
Please cite this article as: S.S. Jadav, B.N. Sinha, R. Hilgenfeld, B. Pastorino, X. de Lamballerie, V. Jayaprakash, Thiazolidone derivatives as inhibitors of chikungunya Virus, European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry (2014), doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2014.10.042. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Graphical abstract: Thiazolidone derivatives as inhibitors of Chikungunya Virus Jadav et al.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
A series of twenty aralkylidene derivatives of thiazolidinone (1-20) were evaluated for anti-chikv activity. 5-[(2-methylphenyl)methylidene]-2sulfanylidene-1,3-thiazolidin-4-one (7) was found to have IC50 of 0.42 µM
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Thiazolidone derivatives as inhibitors of Chikungunya Virus Lamballerie3*, Venkatesan Jayaprakash1* 1
RI PT
Surender Singh Jadav1, Barij Nayan Sinha1, Rolf Hilgenfeld2, Boris Pastorino3, Xavier de
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi-835215, Jharkhand, India 2
Institute of Biochemistry, Center for Structural and Cell Biology in Medicine, University of
SC
Lübeck, 23538 Lübeck, Germany 3
UMR_D 190 "Emergence des Pathologies Virales" (Aix-Marseille University, IRD French
M AN U
Institute of Research for Development, EHESP French School of Public Health), Marseille,
EP
TE D
France
Corresponding Author
AC C
*Venkatesan Jayaprakash
E-mail:
[email protected] Tel: +91-9470137264
*Xavier de Lamballerie
E-mail:
[email protected] Tel: +33 49 132 4553
1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Abstract A series of arylalkylidene derivatives of 1,3-thiazolidin-4-one (1-20) were synthesized and tested for their antiviral activity against chikungunya virus (LR2006_OPY1) in Vero cell culture by
RI PT
CPE reduction assay. Five compounds (7-9, 16 and 19) were identified to have anti-ChikV activity at lower micro molar concentration. The compounds 7, 8, 9, 16 and 19 inhibited the virus at 0.42, 4.2, 3.6, 40.1 and 6.8 µM concentrations respectively. Molecular docking simulation has been carried out using the available X-ray crystal structure of the ChikV nsp2 protease, in order
SC
to elucidate the possible mechanism of action. Interaction of ligands with ChikV nsp2 protease (PDB Code: 3TRK) suggested the possible mechanism of protease inhibition to act as potent
M AN U
anti-ChikV agents.
Keywords:
AC C
EP
TE D
Thiazolidinone; antiviral; chikungunya virus; nsp2 protease; molecular docking
2
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1. Introduction Chikungunya, an emerging arthropod-borne viral infection caused by the chikungunya virus (ChikV, an arbovirus) was first reported from Tanzania during 1952 [1]. A major outbreak
RI PT
has been reported more than 50 years later, during 2005-2007 in Africa and Asia [2, 3] that was followed by limited outbreaks in Europe [4] and the US [5].The emergence of a new clinical form of the virus [6] with vector adaptation (Aedes albopictus) [7] explains its geographical spread to developed nations. Threat due to this emerging virus is likely to be high in future if no
effective vaccine or chemotherapeutic agent available.
SC
means to prevent/treat the infection is developed and made available. To date,there is no
M AN U
Interferons [8] and their combination with Ribavirin [9] and Mercaptopurine [10] were reported to have antiviral activity against ChikV. Arbidol, an antiviral licensed for the treatment of influenza, was found to inhibit ChikV replication [11]. Extracts of a few plant materials have also been reported to exert anti-ChikV activity [12-18]. The current investigation presents the anti-ChikV activity of benzylidene rhodanine derivatives since rhodanine has been identified as a privileged scaffold [19] and reported with antiviral activity against HCV [20, 21] and HIV [22].
TE D
Molecular docking simulation has been carried out with the recently deposited X-ray crystal structure of Chikv nsp2 protease (PDB Code: 3TRK) in order to understand the mechanism of action of the active molecules.
EP
2. Results and Discussion 2.1. Chemistry
AC C
A series of twelve arylalkylidene derivatives of 1,3-thiazolidin-4-one (1-20) were synthesized following the reaction outlined in Scheme 1&2 [23]. Knoevenagel condensation of 2-sulfanylidene-1,3-thiazolidin-4-one (rhodanine) with aromatic/heteroaromatic aldehydes in the presence of acetic acid and ethanol provided compounds 1-12 (Scheme 1). Similarly, condensation
of
2-amino-4,5-dihydro-1,3-thiazole-4-one
(pseudothiohydantoin)
with
aromatic/heteroaromatic aldehydes in the presence of ammonium acetate and glacial acetic acid provided compounds 13-20 (Scheme 2). The resultant precipitates were recrystallized with ethanol to obtain pure final product. All the final compounds were found to have melting points
3
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
closely matching with the available literature and further their structures were confirmed by their 1
H-NMR, 13CNMR and MS data. All the compounds were screened for their anti-ChikV and cytotoxic activity following
RI PT
the procedures discussed below.
2.2. Anti-Chikv & Cell viability assay
Anti-ChikV assay has been carried out with ChikV strain LR2006_OPY1 in Vero cell culture by CPE reduction assay. All the twenty (1-20) compounds have been evaluated for their
SC
antiviral activity and five compounds (7-9, 16 and 19) were found to have antiviral activity (Table 1 & 2, Graphs in Supplementary material). Three compounds (7-9), aralkylidene
M AN U
derivatives of 2-sulfanylidene-1,3-thiazolidin-4-one (1-12) were found to be active. Compound 7 with ortho-methyl substitution (IC50=0.1 µg/mL, Table 1) was found most potent amongst the three and was followed by compound 8 with para-methyl substitution (IC50=1.0 µg/mL, Table 1). Methyl substitution was favorable when it was at ortho-position (7) and was found to be ten times more potent than its para-counterpart (8). Compound 9 (IC50=1.0 µg/mL, Table 1) with 2napthyl ring inhibited virus replication at a concentration similar to that of compound 7. This
TE D
clearly indicated that aralkylidene portion should be non-polar in nature to exert activity. This is further supported by the fact that compounds 1-6 with polar substitutions at para-position and compounds 10-12 with heteroaryl rings were found inactive at highest concentration studied (100 µg/mL). Two compounds (16 & 19, Table 2) from aralkylidene derivatives of 2-amino-4,5-
EP
dihydro-1,3-thiazole-4-one (13-20, Table 2) were found to be active. Compound 16 with orthonitro substitution and compound 19 with meta-methyl substitution were found active at concentrations IC50=10.0 µg/mL and IC50=1.5 µg/mL, respectively (Table 2). Compound 6 and
AC C
16 differ in substitution at 2nd position of thiazolidine ring. A compound featuring sulfanylidene (6) was found inactive while the other with amino group (16) was found to exhibit activity. Similarly, compounds 7 and 8 differ from compound 18 and 20 at 2nd-position, but here the compounds having sulfanylidene group (7 & 8) were found to be active and compounds with amino group (18 & 20) were found inactive. Foregoing observation clearly indicates the influence of endo/exo nature of double bond involving 2nd position of thiazolidine and substitution in the phenyl ring of aralkylidene portions on the activity of the molecules. In the next section (2.3) interaction at molecular level will be discussed having simulations carried out
4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
with ChikV-nsp2 protease as a possible target. Active molecules did not show any cytotoxic effect at their active concentrations. Microscopic observation revealed no changes in the host cell morphology, which clearly indicates the antiviral property of the compounds analyzed (Potential cytotoxic/cytostatic effects of the compound were evaluated in uninfected cells by observing
RI PT
microscopically for any minor signs of virus-induced CPE or alterations to the cells caused by the compound).
2.3. Molecular docking simulation
SC
In an attempt to understand the possible mechanism of action of the active compounds, molecular docking simulation has been carried out with the X-ray crystal structure of Chikv nsp2
M AN U
protease (PDB Code: 3TRK). For compound 7, the aralkylidene portion of the molecule shows strong hydrophobic interaction with three amino-acid residues (TYR1047, TYR1049 and TRP1084) in S3 pocket (formed by TYR1047, TYR1049, TRP1084, MET1238, MET1242) while the thiazolidinone portion shows strong hydrophobic interaction with four amino-acid residues (CYS1013, TYR1047, TYR1049 and TRP1084) in the S2 pocket (formed by CYS1013, TRP1014, ALA1046, TYR1047, TYR1049, TRP1084). Also the carbonyl oxygen of
TE D
thiazolidinone establishes H-bonding interaction with backbone-amide NH of TYR1047 (Fig 1 & 2). In compound 8, the aralkylidene portion is getting accommodated in S3 and exhibits two H-bonding interactions: (i) carbonyl oxygen of thiazolidinone with backbone-amide NH of TYR1047 and (ii) hydrogen of thiazolidinone ring nitrogen with backbone carbonyl oxygen of
EP
ASN1011. The second H-bonding interactions slightly bend the molecule away from the S2 pocket to make the thiazolidinone portion to interact with S1 pocket residue ASN1011. Internal
AC C
strain, along with reduced interaction with the S2 pocket, may be the reason for the reduced potency of this compound (Figures in Supplementary Material). In case of compound 9, the aralkylidene portion is quite away from S3 and shows interaction with residues in S2 and SI. It does not exhibit any H-bonding interaction with TYR1047, but establishes two H-bonding interactions: (i) carbonyl oxygen of thiazolidinone with backbone-amide hydrogen of ALA1046 and (ii) hydrogen of thiazolidinone ring nitrogen with side-chain amino hydrogen of GLU1204. These two H-bonding interactions ensure partial interaction of the molecules with S2 and S3 pocket residues that may be the reason for its reduced potency (Figure in Supplementary Material). Compound 19 exhibits interactions quite similar to compound 8. It establishes three
5
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
H-bonding interactions: (i) carbonyl oxygen of thiazolidinone with backbone-amide hydrogen of ALA1046, (ii) hydrogen of thiazolidinone ring nitrogen with backbone carbonyl oxygen of ASN1011 and (iii) hydrogen of thiazolidinone 2-amino nitrogen with side-chain carbonyl oxygen of ASN1011. The H-bonding interaction with ASN1011 slightly bends the molecule
RI PT
away from the S2 pocket, possibly leading to its reduced potency (Figure in Supplementary Material). Compound 16 interacts with the protein quite differently than the other four (7, 8, 9 and 19) discussed earlier. It exhibits two H-bonding interactions: (i) carbonyl oxygen of thiazolidinone with backbone-amide hydrogen of CYS1013 and (ii) hydrogen of thiazolidinone
SC
2-amino nitrogen with backbone carbonyl oxygen of ASN1082. The hydrophobic interaction is largely confined to S1 pocket leading to 7-fold decreased potency in comparison to compound 19
M AN U
(Figure in Supplementary Material). Based on the foregoing discussion, it can be concluded that the hydrophobic interaction with S2 & S3 pocket and H-bonding interaction with TYR1047 are crucial for activity and potency of the molecule.
3. Conclusion
Twenty compounds were synthesized and tested for their antiviral activity against ChikV strain
TE D
LR2006_OPY1 by CPE reduction assay. Five compounds (7, 8, 9, 16 and 19) were found to have antiviral activity at low micromolar concentration. Compound 7 (IC50=0.42µM) was found to be most potent amongst the five. Molecular docking studies revealed that the inhibitors maypossibly
4. Experimental
EP
act by inhibiting ChikV protease.
AC C
Materials and methods: Chemicals
and
solvents
were
of
reagent
grade
and
purchased
from
Sigma-
Aldrich/Merck/CDH/Rankem. Completion of reaction was monitored on TLC plates (Merck). Melting points were determined on a OPTIMELT automated system apparatus and are uncorrected melting point. Intermediates were characterized by their FT-IR spectra (FTIR8400S-Schimadzu). Final compounds were characterized by their 1H-NMR, 300 MHz (Varion), 1
H and 13CNR (400 MHz) , in DMSO-d6 as a solvent. Mass spectra were recorded by WATERS-
Q-T of Premier-HAB213 using the ESI-MS Electro spray Ionization technique. Proton NMR
6
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Spectra the coupling constants (J) are expressed in hertz (Hz). Chemical shifts (δ) of NMR are reported in parts per million (ppm) units relative to the solvent. 4. 1. General method for the synthesis of aralkylidene derivatives of 2-sulfanylidene-1,3thiazolidin-4-one (1-12)
RI PT
To a solution of rhodanine (0.13 mmol) in ethanol (10 mL) was added aromatic/heteroaromatic aldehydes (0.13 mmol) followed by few drops of glacial acetic acid. The resulting mixture was refluxed for about 24 h. Upon cooling to room temperature,the desired compounds (1-12) were obtained as yellow or yellowish-orange solid. It was then filtered, washed, dried and
SC
recrystallized from hot ethanol. Yield 61-85 %
4.1.1. 5-[(4-hydroxyphenyl)-methylidene]-2-sulfanylidene-1,3-thiazolidin-4-one (1)
M AN U
Yield: 65%; mp: 308 °C (310 °C) [24]; 1HNMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ (ppm) 7.59-7.70 (appeared as multiplet, 3H, Ar-H),7.80 (s, 1H, Ar-CH=), 7.48 ( d, J=7.2 Hz, 2H, Ar-H),8.07 (t, J=6.4 Hz, J=8 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 8.21 (s, 1H, Ar-H), 13.95 (s, 1H, Ar-OH);
13
CNMR (400 MHz,
DMSO-d6): δ (ppm) 126.217-133.82 (Ar-6C, C5, Ar-CH=C8), 169.85 (C=O C4), 196.16 (C2); ESI-MS: 236.16 (M)+; calcd for C10H7NO2S2: 236.99.
4.1.2. 5-[(4-methoxyphenyl)-methylidene]-2-sulfanylidene-1,3-thiazolidin-4-one (2)
TE D
Yield: 80%; mp: 260 °C (261-261 °C) [25]; 1HNMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ (ppm) 3.83 (s, 3H, -OCH3), 7.09-7.56 (appeared as multiplet, 5H, -Ar-H), 9.51 (s, 1H, -NH);
13
CNMR (400 MHz,
DMSO-d6): δ (ppm) 56.00 (Ar-OCH3), 115.52-133.09 (Ar-6C), 161.74 (Ar-CH= C8), 170.22 (C=O C4), 196.12 (C2); ESI-MS: 252.0 (M-1)+; calcd for C11H9NO2S2:251.01.
EP
4.1.3. 5-[(4-chlorophenyl)-methylidene]-2-sulfanylidene-1,3-thiazolidin-4-one (3) Yield: 69%; mp: 230 °C (229-231 °C) [26]; 1HNMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm) 7.60-7.63 13
CNMR (400
AC C
(appeared as multiplet, 4H, Ar-H),7.65 (s, 1H, Ar-CH=), 13.80 (s, 1H, -NH);
MHz, DMSO-d6): δ (ppm) 126.70-132.48 (Ar-5C), 135.80 (Ar-CH=C8), 169.74 (C=O, C4), 195.81 (C2); ESI-MS: 254.66 (M)+; calcd for C10H6ClNOS2: 254.96. 4.1.4. 5-([4-(dimethylamino)-phenyl]-methylidene)-2-sulfanylidene-1,3-thiazolidin-4-one (4) Yield: 85%; mp: 289 °C (285-289 °C) [25, 27, 28]; 1HNMR (Varian 400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm) 3.03 (appeared as singlet, 6H, Ar-N(CH3)2), 6.83 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.43 (d, J=9.2 Hz, 2H, -Ar-H), 7.51 (s, 1H, Ar-CH=), 13.57 (s, 1H, -NH); ); 13CNMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ (ppm) 39.96-40.03 (Ar-N(CH3)2, merged with DMSO peak), 112.63-133.51 (Ar-5C), 152.17 (ArCH= C8), 170.19 (C=O C4), 195.61 (C2); ESI-MS: 265 (M+1)+; calcd for C12H12N2OS2: 264.04.
7
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
4.1.5. 5-[(4-cyanophenyl)-methylidene]-2-sulfanylidene-1,3-thiazolidin-4-one (5) Yield: 75%; mp: 286 °C (286 °C) [29]; 1HNMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm) 7.57 (d, J=2.8 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.59 (s, 1H, Ar-H), 7.71 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 8.85 (s, 1H, Ar-CH=), 13.9 (s, 1H, -NH);
13
CNMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ (ppm) 124.76-129.60 (Ar-4C), 136.75 (Ar-CN),
RI PT
151.12 (Ar-CH= C8), 152.13 (C5), 169.82 (C=O C4), 195.65 (C2); ESI-MS: 245.09 (M)+; calcd for C11H6N2OS2: 245.99.
4.1.6. 5-[(2-nitrophenyl)-methylidene]-2-sulfanylidene-1,3-thiazolidin-4-one (6)
Yield: 78%; mp: 203 °C (204-205 °C) [30]; 1HNMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm) 7.73
SC
(appeared as multiplet, J=6.8 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.88 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 8.21 (d, J=8 Hz, 1H, Ar-CH=), 13.98 (s, 1H, -NH); 13CNMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ (ppm) 125.97-131.69 (Ar-6C),
M AN U
135.05 (C5), 148.40 (Ar-CH=C8), 169.07 (C=O C4), 196.22 (C2); ESI-MS: 265.09 (M)+; calcd for C10H6N2O3S2: 265.98.
4.1.7. 5-[(2-methylphenyl)-methylidene]-2-sulfanylidene-1,3-thiazolidin-4-one (7) Yield: 61%; mp: 200 °C (195-199 °C) [31]; 1HNMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm) 2.41 (s, 3H), 7.34-7.41 (appeared as multiplet, 4H, Ar-H), 7.73 (s, 1H, Ar-CH=), 13.86 (s, 1H, -NH); 13
CNMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ (ppm) 19.84 (Ar-CH3), 127.24-131.49 (Ar-6C), 132.48 (C5),
C11H9NOS2: 235.01.
TE D
139.51 (Ar-CH= C8), 169.78 (C=O C4), 196.65 (C2); ESI-MS: 234.1 (M-1)+; calcd for
4.1.8. 5-[(4-methylphenyl)-methylidene]-2-sulfanylidene-1,3-thiazolidin-4-one (8) Yield: 79%; mp: 235 °C (233-234 °C) [32]; 1HNMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm) 2.36 (s, 3H,
EP
-CH3), 7.36 (appeared as multiplet, 2H, Ar-H), 7.50 (appeared as multiplet, 2H, Ar-H), 7.62 (s, 1H, Ar-CH=), 13.8 (s, 1H, -NH);
13
CNMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ (ppm) 21.57 (Ar-CH3),
124.69-131.00 (Ar-4C), 132.22 (C5), 141.62 (Ar-CH= C8), 169.83 (C=O C4), 196.07 (C2); ESI-
AC C
MS: 235.9 (M+1)+; calcd for C11H9NOS2: 235.01. 4.1.9. 5-(naphthalen-2-yl-methylidene)-2-sulfanylidene-1,3-thiazolidin-4-one (9) Yield: 84%; mp: 270 °C (269-270 °C) [26]; 1HNMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm) 7.62-8.19 (appeared as multiplet, 7H, Ar-H), 8.23 (s, 1H, Ar-CH=), 13.90 (s, 1H, -NH);
13
CNMR (400
MHz, DMSO-d6): δ (ppm) 123.73-131.52 (Ar-10C), 133.73 (C5), 172.00 (Ar-CH= C8), 172.44 (C=O C4), 197.99 (C2); ESI-MS: 272.0 (M+1)+ 4.1.10. 5-(thiophen-2-yl-methylidene)-2-sulfanylidene-1,3-thiazolidin-4-one (10)
8
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Yield: 81%; mp: 230 °C (232-233 °C) [33]; 1HNMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm) 7.31 (t, J=4.4 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.72 (d, J=2.8 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.94 (s, 1H, Ar-H), 8.09 (d, J=4.8 Hz, 1H, Ar-CH=), 13.80 (s, 1H, -NH);
13
CNMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ (ppm)123.43-34.80 (Ar-4C),
for C8H5NOS3: 226.95.
RI PT
135.87 (C5), 137.89 (Ar-CH=C8), 169.49 (C=O C4), 195.00 (C2); ESI-MS: 226.09 (M)+; calcd
4.1.11. 5-(pyridin-2-yl-methylidene)-2-sulfanylidene-1,3-thiazolidin-4-one (11)
Yield: 64%; mp: 294 °C (291-295 °C) [29, 34]; 1HNMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm) 7.44 (t, J=4.8 Hz, J=6 Hz, 1H, Ar-H), 7.68 (s, 1H, Ar-H), 7.89-7.97 (appeared as multiplet, 2H, Ar-H), 13
CNMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ (ppm)
SC
8.79 s, J=4.8 Hz, 1H, Ar-CH=), 13.92 (s, 1H, -NH);
124.42-130.04 (Ar-4C), 138.04 (C4), 149.96-151.53 (Ar-C, Ar-CH=C8), 169.79 (C=O C4),
M AN U
202.44 (C2); ESI-MS: 222.05 (M+1)+; calcd for C9H6N2OS2: 221.99.
4.1.12 5-(pyridin-3-yl-methylidene)-2-sulfanylidene-1,3-thiazolidin-4-one (12) Yield: 68%; mp: 270 °C (269-272 °C) [34, 35]; 1HNMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm) 7.69 (s, 1H, Ar-CH=), 7.78 (d, J=8 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.91(d, J=8 Hz, 2H, Ar-H);
13
CNMR (400 MHz,
DMSO-d6): δ (ppm) 112.63-133.51 (Ar-5C), 137.80 (Ar-CH=C8), 169.69 (C=O), 195.69 (C2);
TE D
ESI-MS: 222.05 (M+1)+; calcd for C9H6N2OS2: 221.99.
4.2. General method for the synthesis of 5-aralkylidine derivatives of 2-amino-4, 5-dihydro1, 3-thiazole-4-one derivatives (13-20)
To a solution of pseudothiohydantoin (1.0 mmol) in ethanol was added an equimolar
EP
aromatic/heteroaromatic aldehydes, ammonium acetate and glacial acetic acid (5 mL). The resulting mixture was refluxed for about 24 h. Upon cooling to room temperature provided
AC C
desired compounds (13-20). It was then filtered, washed, dried and recrystallized from hot ethanol. Yield 49-76 %
4.2.1. 2-amino-5-[(3-hydroxyphenyl)methylidene]-4,5-dihydro-1,3-thiazol-4-one (13) Yield: 52%; mp: 268 °C; 1HNMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm) 6.91 (d, 2H, Ar-H), 7.45 (d, 2H, Ar-H), 7.70 (s, 1H, Ar-CH=), 10.32 (s, 1H, -NH), 12.47 (s, 1H, -OH); 13CNMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ (ppm) 116.56-129.92 (Ar-5C), 131.89 (C5), 159.41 (Ar-C10), 175.85 (C2), 181.12 (C=O C4);
ESI-MS: 219.5 (M-1)+; calcd for C10H8N2O2S: 220. 4.2.2. 2-amino-5-[(4-hydroxyphenyl)methylidene]-4,5-dihydro-1,3-thiazol-4-one (14)
9
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Yield: 66%; mp: 294 °C (295-297°C) [36]; 1HNMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm) 6.80 (dd, 1H, Ar-H), 6.97 (s, 1H, Ar-H), 7.05 (d, 1H, Ar-H) 7.30-7.38 (t, 1H, Ar-H), 7.69 (s, 1H, ArCH=), 9.85 (s, 1H, -NH), 12.61 (s, 1H, -OH); 13CNMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ (ppm) 115.82-129.65 (Ar-6C), 130.61 (C5), 135.71 (Ar-CH= C8), 158.26 (C12), 176.03 (C2), 180.78 (C=O C4); ESI-MS: 219.5
RI PT
(M-1)+; calcd for C10H8N2O2S: 220.
4.2.3. 2-amino-5-[(2, 4-dihydroxyphenyl)methylidene]-4,5-dihydro-1,3-thiazol-4-one (15) Yield: 57%; mp: 325 °C; 1HNMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm) 6.45 (appeared as multiplet, 2H, Ar-H), 7.16 (d, 1H, Ar-H), 7.97 (s, 1H, Ar-CH=), 10.18 (s, 1H, -NH), 10.46 (s, 1H, -OH),
SC
12.35 (s, 1H, -OH);ESI-MS: 235.9 (M)+calcd for C10H8N2O3S: 236.
4.2.4. 2-amino-5-[(2-nitrophenyl)methylidene]-4,5-dihydro-1,3-thiazol-4-one (16)
M AN U
Yield: 76%; mp: 289 °C (291-292 °C) [36]; 1HNMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm) 7.73 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.90 (t, 2H, Ar-H), 8.01 (s, 1H, Ar-CH=),8.21 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H, ArH),12.80 (s, 1H, -NH); 13CNMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ (ppm) 123.38-131.17 (Ar-5C), 132.77 (C5), +
136.34 (Ar-CH= C8), 148.69 (Ar-C13), 175.50 (C2), 180.32 (C=O C4); ESI-MS: 248.5 (M-1) ; calcd for
C10H7N3O3S: 249.
4.2.5. 2-amino-5-[(3-nitrophenyl)methylidene]-4,5-dihydro-1,3-thiazol-4-one (17)
TE D
Yield: 56%; mp: 262°C (264°C) [37]; 1HNMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm) 7.80 (t,1H, Ar-H), 7.96 (s, 1H, Ar-H), 8.01 (d, 1H, Ar-H),8.30 (dd, 1H, Ar-H), 8.45 (s, 1H, Ar-CH=), 12.79 (s, 1H, -NH); 13CNMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ (ppm) 125.85-129.67 (Ar-5C), 131.43 (C5), 134.92 (Ar-CH= C8) +
148.33 (Ar-C10), 167.16 (C2), 168.09 (C=O C4); ESI-MS: 248.5 (M-1) ; calcd for C10H7N3O3S: 249.
EP
4.2.6. 2-amino-5-[(2-methylphenyl)methylidene]-4,5-dihydro-1,3-thiazol-4-one (18) Yield: 67%; mp: 274 °C; 1HNMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm) 2.40 (s, 3H, -CH3), 7.34 – 7.43
AC C
(m, 4H, Ar-H), 7.89 (s, 1H, Ar-CH=),12.64 (s, 1H, -NH); 13CNMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ (ppm) 19.81 (Ar-CH3), 125.58-131.38 (Ar-6C), 132.57 (C5), 139.08 (Ar-CH= C8), 167.53 (C2), 168.55 (C=O C4);
ESI-MS: 218.5 (M-1)+; calcd for C11H10N2OS:218. 4.2.7. 2-amino-5-[(3-methylphenyl)methylidene]-4,5-dihydro-1,3-thiazol-4-one (19) Yield: 51%; mp: 279°C; 1HNMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm) 2.40 (s, 3H, -CH3), 7.20 (s, 1H, Ar-H), 7.40 (m, 3H, Ar-H), 7.53 (s, 1H, Ar-CH=), 9.16 (s, 1H, -NH); 13CNMR (400 MHz, DMSOd6): δ (ppm) 21.41 (Ar-CH3), 126.99-130.64 (Ar-6C), 134.53 (C5), 138.81 (Ar-CH= C8), 175.92 (C2), 180.74 +
(C=O C4); ESI-MS: 219.0 (M+1) ; calcd for C11H10N2OS: 218).
4.2.8. 2-amino-5-[(4-methylphenyl)methylidene]-4,5-dihydro-1,3-thiazol-4-one (20)
10
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Yield: 49%; mp: 280 °C (281-283 °C) [36]; 1HNMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ (ppm) 2.40 (s, 3H, -CH3), 7.30 (d, 2H, Ar-H), 7.41 (d,2H, Ar-H), 7.53 (s, 1H, Ar-CH=),9.25 (s, 1H, -NH); 13CNMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ (ppm)21.42 (Ar-CH3), 128.76-130.22 (Ar-6C), 131.73 (C5), 139.94 (Ar-CH= C8), +
RI PT
175.89 (C2), 180.86 (C=O C4); ESI-MS: 219.0 (M+1) ; calcd for C11H10N2OS: 218.
4. 3. Anti-ChikV and cell viability assay
Cells and virus strain used: ChikV strain LR2006_OPY1 (Genbank DQ443544.2) belongs to the collection of viruses at the UMR 190, Marseille, France. The virus was propagated
SC
in African green monkey kidney cells [Vero cells (ATCC CCL-81)]. Verocells were maintained in cell growth medium composed of minimum essential medium (MEM, Gibco, Belgium)
M AN U
supplemented with 7% Foetal Bovine Serum (FBS, Integro, The Netherlands), 1% L-glutamine (Gibco), and 100U/mL penicillin, 100 µg/mL streptomycin sulfate (Gibco). Cell cultures were then maintained at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 and 95-99% humidity. All compounds were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) to reach a final concentration of 20 mg/mL. CPE reduction assay: Vero cells were seeded in 96-well tissue culture plates (Becton Dickinson, Aalst, Belgium) at a density of 5 × 104 cells/well in 100 µL assay medium
TE D
supplemented with 25 µL of the appropriate virus inoculums (0.01 MOI of ChikV) and 25 µL of a compound dilution series. Each assay was performed in duplicate in the same test. On day 3 post-infection (p.i.), the plates were processed using the cell Titer-Blue method as described by the manufacturer (Promega, The Netherlands) to estimate the % of cell surviving. The 50%
viral CPE
EP
inhibitory concentration (IC50), defined as the compound concentration that is required to inhibit by 50%,
was
subsequently determined
for
each
compound. Potential
AC C
cytotoxic/cytostatic effects of the compound were evaluated in uninfected cells by checking microscopically for minor signs of virus-induced CPE or alterations to the cells caused by the compound.
Cell viability determination: CellTiter-Blue is a fluorescent assay used to measure cell
viability via non-specific redox enzyme activity. Vero cells (ATCC CCL-81) (100 µL, 1 × 105 cells/mL) were seeded into a 96-well flat-bottomed plate and incubated for 24 h at 37°C with 5% CO2. The medium was replaced with increasing concentrations of target compounds (4 to 4000 µg/mL) and cells were incubated for 72h. Cell supernatant was then removed and replaced with CellTiter-Blue (70 µL) reagents and the plate was incubated for 2 h protected from light
11
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
before recording fluorescence intensity (excitation 560 nm, emission 590 nm). Both assays were measured on a Tecan M200 multimode plate reader (Tecan Austria GmbH, Grödig, Austria). CellTiter-Glo reagent was added to the wells (50 µL and 50 µL media) and incubated at room temperature for 10 min protected from light. The luminescence was recorded using the same
RI PT
multimode plate reader. Blank wells (with no reagents) were also measured for luminescence and deducted from the values in experimental wells. Values of viability of treated cells were expressed as a percentage of that from corresponding control cells. All experiments were
SC
repeated at least three times. All assay kits were purchased from Promega, Southampton, UK.
4. 4. Molecular docking
M AN U
Molecular docking: The X-ray crystal structure of ChikV nsp2 protease (PDB: 3TRK) was obtained from the Protein Data Bank (www.rcsb.org). Protein preparation was done using PDB2PQR Server (http://nbcr-222.ucsd.edu/pdb2pqr_1.8/), which adds hydrogens, missing nonhydrogen atoms, assigns protonation states for functional groups of amino-acid sidechains,assigns charge and optimizes H-bonding networks [38, 39]. Ligand structure was sketched and prepared for docking using PRODRG server (http://davapc1.bioch.dundee.ac.uk/cgi-
TE D
bin/prodrg) [40]. MGLTools-1.5.6 rc3 (The Scripps Research Institute) was used to prepare all the parameter files required for performing molecular docking using Autodock-4.2. Grid maps were generated using autogrid-4 (keeping Cys1013 and His1083 as center of the grid with all the parameters at default level except grid dimension of 60x60x60) and docking was performed with
EP
Autodock-4 (with all the parameters at default level exceptno.of GA runs at 50) using Autodock Tools implemented in MGLTools-1.5.6.rc3 [41]. Autodock output file (.dlg) was then analyzed
AC C
through Analysis option provided in MGLTools-1.5.6 rc3. Top-scoring molecules in the largest cluster were analyzed. Complex (in .pdbqt format) of the docked conformer of the ligand (compound 7) with the protein was manually prepared and converted to .pdb format through pdbqt_to_pdb.py script and a 2D-plot was generated using Ligplot+ [42].
12
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Acknowledgment Authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support given by the Department of Biotechnology (DBT), Govt. of India, and the German Ministry of Education and Research /BMBF) as New Indigo-Era net grant (BT/IN/NewIndigo/14/DV/2010 dt. 4th Feb 2011). Work at
RI PT
Lübeck and Marseille was partly supported by the European Commission through its SILVER project ("Small-molecule Lead Compounds versus Neglected and Emerging RNA Viruses", contract no. HEALTH-F3-2010-260644).We are also thankful to Institute of Life Sciences,
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
Hyderabad, AP, India for providing spectral data.
13
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
References
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
[1] R. Ross, The Newala Epidemic, J Hyg, (1956) 177-191. [2] B. Pastorino, J. Muyembe‐Tamfum, M. Bessaud, F. Tock, H. Tolou, J. Durand, C. Peyrefitte, Epidemic resurgence of Chikungunya virus in Democratic Republic of the Congo: identification of a new central African strain, Journal of medical virology, 74 (2004) 277-282. [3] V.A. Arankalle, S. Shrivastava, S. Cherian, R.S. Gunjikar, A.M. Walimbe, S.M. Jadhav, A. Sudeep, A.C. Mishra, Genetic divergence of Chikungunya viruses in India (1963–2006) with special reference to the 2005–2006 explosive epidemic, Journal of general virology, 88 (2007) 1967-1976. [4] P. Hochedez, P. Hausfater, S. Jaureguiberry, F. Gay, A. Datry, M. Danis, F. Bricaire, P. Bossi, Cases of chikungunya fever imported from the islands of the South West Indian Ocean to Paris, France, Euro surveillance: bulletin europeen sur les maladies transmissibles= European communicable disease bulletin, 12 (2007). [5] E. Farnon, Update: Chikungunya fever diagnosed among international travelers-United States, 2006, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 56 (2007) 276-277. [6] D. Nkoghe, R.F. Kassa, M. Caron, G. Grard, I. Mombo, B. Bikié, C. Paupy, P. Becquart, U. Bisvigou, E.M. Leroy, Clinical forms of chikungunya in Gabon, 2010, PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 6 (2012) e1517. [7] K.A. Tsetsarkin, C.E. McGee, S.M. Volk, D.L. Vanlandingham, S.C. Weaver, S. Higgs, Epistatic roles of E2 glycoprotein mutations in adaption of chikungunya virus to Aedes albopictus and Ae. aegypti mosquitoes, PLoS One, 4 (2009) e6835. [8] M. Takehara, Studies on interferon induction and antiviral activity by certain arboviruses, Kobe J Med Sci, 21 (1975) 23-32. [9] S. Briolant, D. Garin, N. Scaramozzino, A. Jouan, J. Crance, In vitro inhibition of Chikungunya and Semliki Forest viruses replication by antiviral compounds: synergistic effect of interferon-α and ribavirin combination, Antiviral research, 61 (2004) 111-117. [10] G.J.W. St, Jr., D.S. Horrigan, P.S. Toyama, Effect of 6-mercaptopurine on the synthesis and action of interferon, Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med., 130 (1969) 852-855. [11] I. Delogu, B. Pastorino, C. Baronti, A. Nougairede, E. Bonnet, L.X. de, In vitro antiviral activity of arbidol against Chikungunya virus and characteristics of a selected resistant mutant, Antiviral Res., 90 (2011) 99-107. [12] E. Konishi, S. Hotta, Effects of tannic acid and its related compounds upon Chikungunya virus, Microbiol. Immunol., 23 (1979) 659-667. [13] M. Bourjot, P. Leyssen, C. Eydoux, J.-C. Guillemot, B. Canard, P. Rasoanaivo, F. Gueritte, M. Litaudon, Flacourtosides A-F, Phenolic Glycosides Isolated from Flacourtia ramontchi, J. Nat. Prod., 75 (2012) 752-758. [14] M. Bourjot, P. Leyssen, C. Eydoux, J.-C. Guillemot, B. Canard, P. Rasoanaivo, F. Gueritte, M. Litaudon, Chemical constituents of Anacolosa pervilleana and their antiviral activities, Fitoterapia, 83 (2012) 1076-1080. [15] P.-M. Allard, P. Leyssen, M.-T. Martin, M. Bourjot, V. Dumontet, C. Eydoux, J.-C. Guillemot, B. Canard, C. Poullain, F. Gueritte, M. Litaudon, Antiviral chlorinated daphnane diterpenoid orthoesters from the bark and wood of Trigonostemon cherrieri, Phytochemistry (Elsevier), 84 (2012) 160-168. [16] M. Bourjot, L. Delang, V.H. Nguyen, J. Neyts, F. Gueritte, P. Leyssen, M. Litaudon, Prostratin and 12O-Tetradecanoylphorbol 13-Acetate Are Potent and Selective Inhibitors of Chikungunya Virus Replication, J. Nat. Prod., 75 (2012) 2183-2187. [17] P. Kaur, M. Thiruchelvan, R.C.H. Lee, H. Chen, K.C. Chen, M.L. Ng, J.J.H. Chu, Inhibition of chikungunya virus replication by harringtonine, a novel antiviral that suppresses viral protein expression, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 57 (2013) 155-167.
14
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
[18] M. Meneghetti, S. Rossi, Pharmaceutical composition based on Peschiera (or Voacanga) and Euphorbia species for treatment of chikungunya, to increase antiviral, antifungal, and TNF-α-inhibiting activities of Euphorbia tirucalli, and for potentiation of Peschiera antimycobacterial (multiresistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis and M. ulcerans) and antimalarial properties, in, Italy . 2010, pp. 13pp. [19] T. Mendgen, C. Steuer, C.D. Klein, Privileged Scaffolds or Promiscuous Binders: A Comparative Study on Rhodanines and Related Heterocycles in Medicinal Chemistry, J. Med. Chem., 55 (2012) 743-753. [20] B.A. Patel, R. Krishnan, N. Khadtare, K.R. Gurukumar, A. Basu, P. Arora, A. Bhatt, M.R. Patel, D. Dana, S. Kumar, N. Kaushik-Basu, T.T. Talele, Design and synthesis of l- and d-phenylalanine derived rhodanines with novel C5-arylidenes as inhibitors of HCV NS5B polymerase, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 21 (2013) 3262-3271. [21] J.P. Powers, D.E. Piper, Y. Li, V. Mayorga, J. Anzola, J.M. Chen, J.C. Jaen, G. Lee, J. Liu, M.G. Peterson, G.R. Tonn, Q. Ye, N.P.C. Walker, Z. Wang, SAR and Mode of Action of Novel Non-Nucleoside Inhibitors of Hepatitis C NS5b RNA Polymerase, J. Med. Chem., 49 (2006) 1034-1046. [22] G. Maga, F. Falchi, M. Radi, L. Botta, G. Casaluce, M. Bernardini, H. Irannejad, F. Manetti, A. Garbelli, A. Samuele, S. Zanoli, J.A. Este, E. Gonzalez, E. Zucca, S. Paolucci, F. Baldanti, R.J. De, Z. Debyser, M. Botta, Toward the Discovery of Novel Anti-HIV Drugs. Second-Generation Inhibitors of the Cellular ATPase DDX3 with Improved Anti-HIV Activity: Synthesis, Structure-Activity Relationship Analysis, Cytotoxicity Studies, and Target Validation, ChemMedChem, 6 (2011) 1371-1389. [23] K. Ramkumar, V.N. Yarovenko, A.S. Nikitina, I.V. Zavarzin, M.M. Krayushkin, L.V. Kovalenko, A. Esqueda, S. Odde, N. Neamati, Design, Synthesis and Structure-activity Studies of Rhodanine Derivatives as HIV-1 Integrase Inhibitors, Molecules, 15 (2010) 3958-3992. [24] N.H. Metwally, N.M. Rateb, H.F. Zohdi, A simple and green procedure for the synthesis of 5arylidene-4-thiazolidinones by grinding, Green Chem. Lett. Rev., 4 (2011) 225-228. [25] J.-F. Zhou, Y.-Z. Song, F.-X. Zhu, Y.-L. Zhu, Facile synthesis of 5-benzylidene rhodanine derivatives under microwave irradiation, Synth. Commun., 36 (2006) 3297-3303. [26] H. Wang, J. Zeng, Iodine catalysed synthesis of 5-(arylmethylidene) rhodanines by grinding under solvent-free conditions, Journal of Chemical Research, 2009 (2009) 374-376. [27] J.-F. Zhou, F.-X. Zhu, Y.-Z. Song, Y.-L. Zhu, Synthesis of 5-(arylalkylidene)rhodanines catalyzed by tetrabutylammonium bromine in water under microwave irradiation, ARKIVOC (Gainesville, FL, U. S.), (2006) 175-180. [28] E. Ojeka, J. Iyun, 5 (4-dimethylaminobenzylidene) rhodanine as a reagent for the spectrophotometric determination of copper and manganese, Global Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 10 (2004) 577-583. [29] J.-A. Pinson, O. Schmidt-Kittler, J. Zhu, I.G. Jennings, K.W. Kinzler, B. Vogelstein, D.K. Chalmers, P.E. Thompson, Thiazolidinedione-Based PI3Kα Inhibitors: An Analysis of Biochemical and Virtual Screening Methods, ChemMedChem, 6 (2011) 514-522. [30] F.J. Allan, G.G. Allan, J. Thomson, The condensation of rhodanine with aromatic dialdehydes and some related compounds, Canadian Journal of Chemistry, 36 (1958) 1579-1583. [31] A.J. Russell, I.M. Westwood, M.H.J. Crawford, J. Robinson, A. Kawamura, C. Redfield, N. Laurieri, E.D. Lowe, S.G. Davies, E. Sim, Selective small molecule inhibitors of the potential breast cancer marker, human arylamine N-acetyltransferase 1, and its murine homologue, mouse arylamine Nacetyltransferase 2, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 17 (2009) 905-918. [32] J.F. Zhou, Y.Z. Song, F.X. Zhu, Y.L. Zhu, Facile Synthesis of 5‐Benzylidene Rhodamine Derivatives under Microwave Irradiation, Synthetic communications, 36 (2006) 3297-3303. [33] W.S. EMERSON, T.M. PATRICK Jr, The preparation of 2-thiophenealdehyde and some of its derivatives, The Journal of Organic Chemistry, 14 (1949) 790-797.
15
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
[34] M. Sortino, P. Delgado, S. Juarez, J. Quiroga, R. Abonia, B. Insuasty, M. Nogueras, L. Rodero, F.M. Garibotto, R.D. Enriz, S.A. Zacchino, Synthesis and antifungal activity of (Z)-5-arylidenerhodanines, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 15 (2007) 484-494. [35] V. Opletalova, J. Dolezel, K. Kralova, M. Pesko, J. Kunes, J. Jampilek, Synthesis and characterization of (Z)-5-(arylmethylidene)rhodanine derivatives with photosynthesis-inhibiting properties, Molecules, 16 (2011) 5207-5227. [36] J.F. Zhou, X.J. Sun, F.X. Zhu, Y.L. Li, G.X. Gong, A Facile Synthesis of 5-Arylidene-2-imino-4thiazolidinones Under Microwave Irradiation, Synthetic Communications, 38 (2008) 4182-4187. [37] H. Taniyama, T. Yusa, T. Tabuchi, H. Uchida, Chemotherapeutics for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. XI. Syntheses and antibacterial activity of 4-thiazolidinone derivatives containing α,β-unsaturated ketone group. 1, Yakugaku Zasshi, 76 (1956) 154-157. [38] T.J. Dolinsky, P. Czodrowski, H. Li, J.E. Nielsen, J.H. Jensen, G. Klebe, N.A. Baker, PDB2PQR: expanding and upgrading automated preparation of biomolecular structures for molecular simulations, Nucleic Acids Research, 35 (2007) W522-W525. [39] T.J. Dolinsky, J.E. Nielsen, J.A. McCammon, N.A. Baker, PDB2PQR: an automated pipeline for the setup of Poisson–Boltzmann electrostatics calculations, Nucleic Acids Research, 32 (2004) W665-W667. [40] A.W. Schuttelkopf, D.M. van Aalten, PRODRG: a tool for high-throughput crystallography of proteinligand complexes, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography, 60 (2004) 1355-1363. [41] G.M. Morris, R. Huey, W. Lindstrom, M.F. Sanner, R.K. Belew, D.S. Goodsell, A.J. Olson, AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility, Journal of computational chemistry, 30 (2009) 2785-2791. [42] A.C. Wallace, R.A. Laskowski, J.M. Thornton, LIGPLOT: a program to generate schematic diagrams of protein-ligand interactions, Protein engineering, 8 (1995) 127-134.
16
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Figure caption:
Figure 1a. Interaction of compound 7 with ChikV nsp2 protease (PDB Code; 3TRK), ligand and
RI PT
amino-acid residues are shown as tubes colored by atom type, H-bonding interaction shown as green dots, VdW radii shown as wired sphere (Figure generated in MGLTools-1.5.6 rc3)
Figure 1b. 2-Dplot showing interaction of compound 7 with ChikV nsp2 protease (PDB Code;
SC
3TRK), H-bonding interaction shown as green broken lines and hydrophobic interaction as red
M AN U
spikes (Figure generated in Ligplot+)
Scheme 1.Reagents and conditions: (a) R-CHO, EtOH, AcOH, reflux, 24 h
AC C
EP
TE D
Scheme 2. Reagents and conditions: (a) R-CHO, EtOH, AcOH, NH4Ac, reflux, 24 h
17
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
7 8
TE D
9 10 11 12
IC50 (µM) CC50 (µM) ND >100 ND >100 ND >100 ND >100 ND >100 ND >100 0.42 2-CH3-C6H4 >100 (0.1 µg/mL) 4.2 4-CH3-C6H4 >100 (1.0 µg/mL) 3.6 C10H7 (napth-2-yl) >100 (1.0 µg/mL) C4H3S (thiophen-2-yl) ND >100 C5H4N (pyridine-2-yl) ND >100 C5H4N (pyridine-3-yl) ND >100
SC
R 4-OH-C6H4 4-OCH3-C6H4 4-Cl-C6H4 4-N(CH3)2-C6H4 4-CN-C6H4 2-NO2-C6H4
M AN U
Code 1 2 3 4 5 6
RI PT
Table 1. Antiviral activity of Compounds 1-12 against ChikV
ND-Not Determined (Not showing any activity at the maximum concentration
AC C
EP
studiedie. 100 µM)
18
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
SC
RI PT
Table 2. Antiviral activity of Compounds 13-20against ChickV
IC50 (µM) CC50 (µM) ND >100 ND >100 ND >100 40.1 >100 16 2-NO2-C6H4 (10.0 µg/mL) ND >100 17 3-NO2-C6H4 ND >100 18 2-CH3-C6H4 6.8 >100 19 3-CH3-C6H4 (1.5 µg/mL) ND >100 20 4-CH3-C6H4 ND-not determined (Not showing any activity at the maximum concentration
AC C
EP
studiedie. 100 µg/mL)
TE D
M AN U
Code R 13 3-OH-C6H4 14 4-OH-C6H4 15 2,4-diOH-C6H3
19
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
M AN U
SC
RI PT
Figure 1a
AC C
EP
TE D
Figure 1b
20
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
SC
RI PT
Scheme 1.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
Scheme 2.
21
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
8 9 10 11 12
SC
IC50 (µM) CC50 (µM) ND >100 ND >100 ND >100 ND >100 ND >100 ND >100 0.42 2-CH3-C6H4 >100 (0.1 µg/mL) 4.2 4-CH3-C6H4 >100 (1.0 µg/mL) 3.6 C10H7 (napth-2-yl) >100 (1.0 µg/mL) C4H3S (thiophen-2-yl) ND >100 C5H4N (pyridine-2-yl) ND >100 C5H4N (pyridine-3-yl) ND >100
M AN U
7
R 4-OH-C6H4 4-OCH3-C6H4 4-Cl-C6H4 4-N(CH3)2-C6H4 4-CN-C6H4 2-NO2-C6H4
TE D
Code 1 2 3 4 5 6
RI PT
Table 1. Antiviral activity of Compounds 1-12 against ChikV
ND-Not Determined (Not showing any activity at the maximum concentration
AC C
EP
studiedie. 100 µM)
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
SC
IC50 (µM) CC50 (µM) ND >100 ND >100 ND >100 40.1 >100 16 2-NO2-C6H4 (10.0 µg/mL) ND >100 17 3-NO2-C6H4 ND >100 18 2-CH3-C6H4 6.8 >100 19 3-CH3-C6H4 (1.5 µg/mL) ND >100 20 4-CH3-C6H4 ND-not determined (Not showing any activity at the maximum concentration
M AN U
Code R 3-OH-C 13 6H4 14 4-OH-C6H4 15 2,4-diOH-C6H3
RI PT
Table 2. Antiviral activity of Compounds 13-20against ChickV
AC C
EP
TE D
studiedie. 100 µg/mL)
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Figure caption:
Figure 1a. Interaction of compound 7 with ChikV nsp2 protease (PDB Code; 3TRK), ligand and amino-acid residues are shown as tubes colored by atom type, H-bonding
RI PT
interaction shown as green dots, VdW radii shown as wired sphere (Figure generated in MGLTools-1.5.6 rc3)
Figure 1b. 2-Dplot showing interaction of compound 7 with ChikV nsp2 protease
SC
(PDB Code; 3TRK), H-bonding interaction shown as green broken lines and hydrophobic interaction as red spikes (Figure generated in Ligplot+)
M AN U
Scheme 1.Reagents and conditions: (a) R-CHO, EtOH, AcOH, reflux, 24 h
AC C
EP
TE D
Scheme 2. Reagents and conditions: (a) R-CHO, EtOH, AcOH, NH4Ac, reflux, 24 h
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
M AN U
SC
RI PT
Figure 1a
AC C
EP
TE D
Figure 1b
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
SC
RI PT
Scheme 1.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
Scheme 2.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Highlight
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
Aralkylidene derivatives of thiazolidinone (1-20) were screened for their anti-chikv activity Five compounds (7, 8, 9, 16 & 19) were found to be active at lower µ M concentrations Compounds with polar substitution in (hetero)aryl portion were found to be inactive Docking simulation suggests the inhibition of chikv nsp2 protease inhibition
RI PT
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1
HNMR spectra of compound 1
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
13
CNMR Spectra of Compound 1
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1
HNMR spectra of compound 2
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
13
CNMR of compound 2
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1
HNMR spectra of compound 3
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
13
CNMR Spectra of Compound 3
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1
HNMR spectra of compound 4
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
13
CNMR of compound 4
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1
HNMR spectra of compound 5
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
13
CNMR of compound 5
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1
HNMR spectra of compound 6
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
13
CNMR Spectra of Compound 6
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1
HNMR spectra of compound 7
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
13
CNMR of compound 7
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1
HNMR spectra of compound 8
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
13
CNMR of compound 8
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1
HNMR spectra of compound 9
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
13
CNMR of compound 9
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1
HNMR spectra of compound 10
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
13
CNMR Spectra of Compound 10
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1
HNMR spectra of compound 11
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
13
CNMR Spectra of Compound 11
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1
HNMR spectra of compound 12
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
13
CNMR Spectra of Compound 12
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ESI Mass spectra of compound 2
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ESI Mass spectra of compound 3
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ESI Mass spectra of compound 4
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ESI Mass spectra of compound 6
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ESI Mass spectra of compound 8
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ESI Mass spectra of compound 9
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ESI Mass spectra of compound 11
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1
HNMR spectra of compound 13
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
13
CNMR of compound 13
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1
HNMR spectra of compound 14
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
13
CNMR of compound 14
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1
HNMR spectra of compound 15
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1
HNMR spectra of compound 16
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
13
CNMR of compound 16
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1
HNMR spectra of compound 17
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
13
CNMR of compound 17
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1
HNMR spectra of compound 18
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
13
CNMR of compound 18
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1
HNMR spectra of compound 19
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
13
CNMR of compound 19
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1
HNMR spectra of compound 20
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
13
CNMR of compound 20
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ESI Mass spectra of compound 13
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ESI Mass spectra of compound 14
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ESI Mass spectra of compound 15
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ESI Mass spectra of compound 16
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ESI Mass spectra of compound 19
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ESI Mass spectra of compound 20
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Antiviral activity Concentration Vs % of cell survival Graph CHIKV ANTIVIRAL EFFECT OF COMPOUND 7 100 90
RI PT
70 60 50 40 30
SC
% OF CELL SURVIVING
80
20
M AN U
10 0 0
1
2
3
4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 COMPOUND 7 CONCENTRATION µg/ml
12
13
14
15
16
12
13
14
15
16
CHIKV ANTIVIRAL EFFECT OF COMPOUND 8 100
TE D
90 80
60
EP
50 40 30
AC C
% OF CELL SURVIVING
70
20 10 0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
COMPOUND 8 CONCENTRATION µg/ml
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
CHIKV ANTIVIRAL EFFECT OF COMPOUND 9 100 90
RI PT
80 % OF CELL SURVIVING
70 60 50
SC
40 30
M AN U
20 10 0 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
12
13
14
15
16
COMPOUND 9 CONCENTRATION µg/ml
CHIKV ANTIVIRAL EFFECT OF COMPOUND 19
TE D
100 90 80
EP
70
% OF CELL SURVIVING
60
AC C
50 40 30 20 10 0 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
COMPOUND 19 CONCENTRATION µg/ml
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
CHIKV ANTIVIRAL EFFECT OF COMPOUND 16 60
RI PT
40
30
SC
20
0 0
1
2
3
M AN U
10
4
5
6
EP
TE D
COMPOUND 16 CONCENTRATION µg/ml
AC C
% OF CELL SURVIVING
50
7
8
9
10
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Molecular docking snapshots Ala1010
Asn1082
RI PT
Asn1082
Trp1014
OD1
S2
S2
Asn1011
CG CB
C3
ND2
Cys1013
C3
Leu1205
CA
N
S1
C
N
3.10
CD1
C2 CB
CG OH
0070
O N
C4
3.09
OH
N
C4
2.73
C5
CD2 CE2
C11 C5
CA
Tyr1047
CB
CG
Ala1046
CD2 CE2
0080
O
Tyr1047 CZ
C1
CZ
C2 C1
O
CD1
CE1
C11
SC
CE1
Ala1046
CA
C
C
C10
C6
Cys1013
S1
N
C8
O
C6
C9
C7
O
C9 C7
Glu1204
C8
C10
Trp1084
Trp1084
M AN U
Tyr1079
Ser1048
3trk_prep
A
Asn1082 O C2
C13
Leu1205
Asn1011
O
C3
Leu1205 Leu1205
EP
CE1 CE1
O
NN
CD
CB
AC C
3trk_prep_3
C4
His1083
Ala1046 O
C5
CB
C11 C5
CC
N
CA
C4
Ala1046 C
C6
OE1
C9 C10
C6 C7
C8 CD OE2
CB
C9 C7 C8
C
Glu1204 C
Glu1204
C10
O
CG
CA N
CA
Trp1084
Tyr1079
C
0080 0070
C11 C10 C1
2.73 3.09
OO
Glu1204
CG
C8
C11 CA CA
Tyr1047
2.90
S1
C2
Tyr1047
CD2 CD2 CE2 CE2
Cys1013 Cys1013
S1
C9 C7 C2 C1
C12 O O
CB CB
CG CG
CZ OH OH
OE1
Trp1084
N
3.10
C
OE2
C3
N
C
CD1 CD1
Tyr1047 CZ
2.62 S1 C6
C13 CA N
CB
His1083
S2
CB
ND2
Ala1046
CA
S2
Asn1202
C14 C5
CG
N
C11 C10
C3
S2
2.90
C8
N
C1
C4
OD1
Cys1013
C9 C7
C12
Tyr1047
0090
Trp1014
2.62 S1 C6
Asn1082 C2
S2
Asn1202
C14 C5
Asn1082 O
Lys1045
C3
C1
C4
Asn1011 Ala1010
N
TE D
0090
Ser1048
B
Asn1011
Lys1045
Tyr1079
N
Tyr1079
D
Figure 1. 2-D plot of compound 7 (A), 8 (B), 9 (C) and their overlap (D). H-bonding interactions were shown in green broken lines, hydrophobic interactions were shown as spikes over aminoacid residues and ligand atoms. Common interacting residues are highlighted in red circle.
O
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ND2
OD1
Asn1082
Asn1082 CG
2.81
RI PT
N
CB
NAB
S2
Asn1011 Leu1205
C2 CB
CG
2.95
0070
O
C4
3.09
N
OH
OAC
C10
C6
C8
CAH
CAG
CA
CE2
C
CAM
3.09
N
CD2
C11 C5
CA
CAD
CAN
CB
CZ
Ala1046
CD2 CE2
0191
C
C9 C7
Glu1204 Trp1084
His1083
CAE
CAA
CAF
Ser1048
A
M AN U
Trp1084
Tyr1079
Tyr1079
Trp1014
B
ND2
OD1
OD1 ND2 N CG
2.81 CB
TE D
Asn1082 CG
N
NAB
Asn1011
CA
Leu1205 O
NAI
2.95 CE1 CE1
CD1 CD1
CAB OAI
CAM C4
EP
CC
His1083
0070
CAH
CAG
CA CA
Tyr1047
3.09 3.09
N
Ala1046
C11 C5
0191
His1083
2.99 CAC CAG
0161
CA
CAE
C6
SAD
SG
CAK
CAA C10
C8
Cys1013
OO
CAN C OAP
CB
CAF C9 C7
AC C
NAF
2.87 NAA CAE
Val1012
CAD
C1
NN
O
S1
C2
CD2 CE2 CD2
Asn1082
C
Cys1013
N
CAN
OAC O
CB CB
CZ OH CZ
CE2
SAJ C3
CAO
Tyr1047 CG CG
CA CB
S2
CAL
C
Glu1204
CAM
CAH
Ala1010
CAJ
O
CAL NAO
Trp1084
OAQ
Tyr1079
CAK
Asn1011
Lys1009
Trp1014 Ser1048
C
Ala1046
CAK
O
O
OH
Cys1013
CAO
Tyr1047 CG
C1
CZ
Tyr1047
CD1
CE1
SC
OH
S1
CD1
SAJ
NAI
O
N
CE1
CAL
C
Cys1013
C3
CA
Lys1016
D
Figure 2. 2D-plot of compound 7 (A), 19 (B), their overlap (C) and 16. H-bonding interactions were shown in green broken lines, hydrophobic interactions were shown as spikes over aminoacid residues and ligand atoms. Common interacting residues are highlighted in red circle.