Vol. 171, No. 2, 1990 September
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
14, 1990
Page5
575-580
THYROID HORMONE AND DNA BINDING PROPERTIES OF A MUTANT C-ERBAB RECEPTOR ASSOCIATED WITH GENERALIZED THYROID HORMONE RESISTANCE Stephen J. Usalal, Fredric E. Wondisford2, Tracey L. Watsonl, 1 Department
of Medicine,
2 Department 3 Molecular, Received
July
Jay B Menkel,
and Bruce D. Weintraubs
East Carolina University School of Medicine, North Carolina, 27858-4354
of Medicine,
Case Western Reserve University School of Medjcine, Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
Cellular and Nutritional Endocrinology Health, Bethesda, Maryland, 23,
Greenville,
Branch, National 20892
Institutes
of
1990
SUMMARY: We have previously reported a family, Kindred A, with autosomal dominant generalized thyroid hormone resistance in which affected members were found to have a mutation in the carboxy-terminal domain of the c-erbA8 thyroid hormone receptor. In the currentstudy, the thyroid hormone and DNA-binding properties of this mutant receptor were determined using c-erbA8 protein synthesized in vitro. Both the wild-type human placental c-erbA8 and Kindred A receptors bound [125l]-triiodothyronine, although the Kindred A receptor had decreased affinity for the hormone. The affinity for triiodothyronine was 4.5 x 109 M-1 and 2.3 x 1010 M-1 for the mutant and wild-type receptors, respectively. No abnormality of DNA-binding was detected with the Kindred A receptor using a sensitive avidin-biotin DNA-binding assay with DNA fragments containing thyroid hormone response elements. The Kindred A mutant receptor which displays abnormal triiodothyronine-binding but normal DNA-binding activities in vitro acts as a dominant negative inhibitor of thyroid hormone action in man. 0 1990Academic mess, Inc. Generalized heterogeneous
thyroid
hormone
refractoriness
resistance is a syndrome
in peripheral
in man characterized
tissues and pituitary
by
to high levels of
circulating thyroid hormones (1,2). The c-erbA8 thyroid hormone receptor on chromosome 3 (3,4) has been linked to generalized thyroid hormone resistance in multiple
kindreds with different
phenotypes
(5,6). Recently different
c-erbAB
mutations have been identified in two kindreds with GTHR. A point mutation, Mf, consisting of a guanine to cytosine replacement at nucleotide position 1318 resulted in a glycine to arginine substitution in codon 340 in one of two alleles (7). An amplified cDNA fragment containing Mf was inserted into a wild-type c-erbA8 receptor, expressed in vitro, and the mutant binding!
Mf product
appeared
to have no T3-
(7).
ABBREVIATIW
T3, L-3,5,3’ triiodothyronine. 0006-291x/90
575
$1.50
Copyrigh? 0 1990 by Academic Press, Inc. All rights of reprodtktion in any form reserved.
Vol.
171,
No.
2,
In another
BIOCHEMICAL
1990
kindred,
A, we found
a base mutation,
nucleotide
position
mutation
was tightly
linked
to the resistance
affected
members
but in none
all of seven current
study
we have
placental
p-receptor
data
the
that
to the reported the Kindred gene
Kindred
inserted
expressed
this mutant
does
bind
We have
on thyroid gene
into
that
at (6). This
A being
members.
present
in
In the
the wild-type
human
receptor
in vitro,
and present
reduced
affinity
in contrast
the DNA-binding
response
and found
P-receptor
in Kindred
T3 but with
also tested
hormone
to adenine
unaffected
A mutation
A receptor
hormone
syndrome
the Kindred
(c-erbAPl),
A receptor
of the
of ten
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
cytosine
the carboxy-terminus
Mf P-receptor.
and rat growth
to affect
1643 near
AND BIOPHYSICAL
elements this mutation
properties
of the human does
of TSHP
not appear
DNA-binding.
MATERIALS AND METHODS Kindred A Receptor cDNA The cloning from fibroblast RNA of a partial Kindred A cDNA (nucleotides 13361671) with the cytosine to adenine mutation at nucleotide position 1643 has been previously reported (6). The 3’-oligomer used to amplify and clone this cDNA sequence was complementary to the 3’-untranslated portion of the c-erbAfi1 sequence (nucleotides 1672-1698) reported by Weinberger et al. (3) except it contained a thymine at nucleotide position 1680 to create an Eco RI site. This was the Eco RI site used to obtain the Bgl II (1563) - Eco RI (1680) segment and create the Kindred A receptor plasmid shown in figure 1. The remaining portion of the Kindred A receptor plasmid consisted of pGEM3 and the wild-type human placental
Wild-Type cDNA beA 101)
Khdred A cDNA ““CII. (1336-1671) A-1643 RlBgl II
RI r--J
RI
A RI
TAG-End
RI. Bgl II /
Gel Purly Bgl II
I
Kindred
A P-Receptor
Figure 1. Construction of the Kindred A P-receptor cDNA. A plasmid containing a partial c-erbAP EDNA from Kindred A with the point mutation at nucleotide position 1643, C-+A, (top, right) was used. A Bgl II - Eco RI segment of this cDNA was inserted into the identical position of the wild-type human placental P-receptor cDNA contained in pGEM3 (peA 101) asshown. The Bgl II - Eco RI contained the stop codon (TAG) of the P-receptor.
576
Vol. 171, No. 2, 1990
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
B-receptor from peA 101 (3). The presence of the Kindred A mutation by sequencing the Bgl II - Eco RI segment in the construct.
was confirmed
In vitro Translation cRNAs of the Kindred A receptor cDNA, wild-type receptor cDNA in peA 101, and anti-sense Kindred A receptor were prepared according to Promega (Madison, WI) specifications using m7G (5’)ppp(5’)G from Pharmacia (Piscataway, NJ). The in vitro translation reactions were prepared using the DuPont - NEN Reticulocyte Lysate L-3%Methionine Translation Kit (Wilmington, DE). Labeled products were analyzed on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels. TpBinding
Studies
2 pl of each translation reaction (wild-type and Kindred A receptors, antisense reaction products and translation products without added RNA) were incubated for 18 hours at 2” in 0.5 ml of buffer (50mM NaCI/lO%v/v glycerol/2mM EDTAI5 mM 2-mercaptoethanol/ZO mM Tris-HCI, pH 7.6) as described by lnoue et al. (8). L-3,5,3’[1251]-triiodothyronine of specific activity 2200 Ci/mmol was purchased from NENDuPont and final concentrations of [125l]T3 of .77 nM to ,038 nM were used in the nitrocellulose filter-binding assay of lnoue et al. T3-binding was measured with duplicate filters, and non-specific binding was determined in the presence of a LOOfold excess of unlabeled T3. DNA-Binding
Studies
The avidin-biotin DNA-binding assay used to measure Kindred A and wild-type receptor binding to DNA fragments of the TSHP and rat growth hormone genes, and a fragment of the long terminal repeat of adenovirus 5, has been described (9). Briefly, DNA fragments containing 5’-overhands were filled in with biotin-I I-dUTP and Taq DNA polymerase. Each DNA fragment contained eleven biotinylated residues and was quantitatively precipitated by a streptavidin-agarose matrix. The biotinylated fragments were incubated with radiolabeled Kindred A receptor or wild-type B-receptor, and non-specific fragments were precipitated with a streptavidin-agarose matrix and the amount of receptor bound was quantitated using liquid scintillation counting. RESULTS The %-labeled
products of in vitro translation
from wild-type
c-erbA8 and Kindred A cRNAs were analyzed on polyacrylamide two proteins corresponding to the 52,200 and 49,100 molecular predicted
from the human placental
human placental gels and showed weight-proteins
c-erbAB cDNA (10) (data not shown).
labeled products from anti-sense Kindred A and control translation
No 3%
mixtures were
seen. TX-binding of the wild-type and Kindred A translation products were quantitated with the filter-binding assay of lnoue et al. (8). The Kindred A receptor was repeatedly shown to bind T3 with relatively high-affinity. The binding of T3 over a concentration
range of 0.04 - 0.80 nM is shown by Scatchard plot in figure 2. The
Kindred A translation product bound T3 with an affinity of approximately 4.5 X 109 M-r whereas the wild-type c-erbAB translation product bound T3 with a higher affinity of 2.3 X 1010 M-1. The anti-sense or control translation products did not bind significant
quantities
of T3. 577
Vol. 171, No. 2, 1990
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL
0.00
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
0.02
Bound (nM) Fi ure 2. Scatchard plot of TX-binding data with the Kindred A (circles) and wildproducts. The data are fit with the method of +type trrangles) in vitro translation least squares; the Kindred A and wild-type human placental c-erbAP receptor T3-affinitieswere 4.5 X 109 M-l and 2.3 X 1010 M-l, respectively.
To study the DNA-binding
properties
of the Kindred A and wild-type
the avidin-biotin
DNA binding
previously found
to be the most sensitive method
interactions
assay was employed
encompassing
(9). This assay has been for studying
and has been widely used in the characterization
elements of several genes (9,11,12).
receptors,
DNA fragments
T3-receptor-DNA of Tj-response
from the human TSHP gene
-12 to + 43 bp (11) and from the rat growth
hormone
gene
encompassing -188 to -160 bp (12) that were known to contain thyroid hormone response elements and to bind c-erbAP were used. Also, a fragment from the long terminal
repeat of adenovirus
was used for a control
5 which does not bind significant
(12). The amount
c-erbAP that bound to these fragments
AD5
of W-labeled
wild-type
amounts
are shown in figure 3. Equivalent
RAT OH
of c-erbAP
and mutant amounts
HUMAN TSHD
Figure 3. Binding of the wild-type human placental c-erbA8 and Kindred A in vitro receptors to DNA fragments containing the TSH8 segment -12 to + 43 and rat rowth hormone gene segment -188 to -160. The negative control wasa DNA 3ragment containing the adenovirus 5 long terminal repeat. The avidin-biotin DNA binding assay was employed with one picomole of the respective biotin lated DNA fragment and equivalent amounts of W-labeled wild-type and Kindre CF.A rn v&o translation products were used as quantitated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
578
Vol.
171,
No.
2,
of wild-type
1990
BIOCHEMICAL
and mutant
gel electrophoresis. bound
with
c-erbAfl
of the in vitro
were
The rat growth
comparable
BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH
used as quantitated
hormone
or perhaps
Kindred
AND
by SDS-polyacrylamide
and human
slightly
greater
COMMUNICATIONS
TSHP gene
avidity
fragments
to an equivalent
amount
A receptor.
DISCUSSION Two
mutations
in the c-erbA@
reported
in different
Kindred
A in codon
340 (glycine
kindreds
fibroblast
also showed
a reduced
have
been
thyroid
hormone
mutant
forms
receptors
(14,15,16),
However
such studies
(14,15).
hydrogen
bond
to form
unique
conformation
produced
in vitro
the ability
to bind
for the wild-type Kindred levels
needed
We now
biochemical
isdefective
in binding
T3 with
relatively
receptor, thyroid
The Mf mutant
receptor
is due to the differences the result
binding seven
c-erbA
cDNAs
T3-binding
including wild-type
receptor
T3-affinity
iswithin
was only
shown
of T3 relative
human
to the of the
not appear
Thyroid
hormone
human
c-erbAg
quantities
elements.
to the
which
cannot
may result
in a
transcriptional A receptor
Yet, this receptor 5-fold
when did have
less than
affected
euthyroidal
that
members
status
with
Kindred
to perturb receptors
T3 (7); it is unclear
Kindred
for T3 of the
the in vitro
structure
attention
the Kindred
A recent
the wild-type
placental
of the Mf receptor
does
the
methodologies.
of T3 concentration
The altered
human the
(17) and the
why the
not to bind
this range
function
drawn is a residue
approximately
a relatively
between
the affinities
human
M-1 and our measured
propertiesof
for high-affinity
hormone.
affinity,
was reported
of different
of the
of the a and fi
conformation
that
A
of
higher
hormones. in structure
assay compared
T3-affinity
high
and maintain
of circulating
the
is crucial
and this may in part explain
A can compensate
rather
thyroid
using
studies
had indicated
and subsequent evidence
work
such methods
of the P-receptor
for T3-binding
present
to GTHR
although regions
Proline
at the carboxy-terminus
linked
variousTs-binding about
or beta-sheet
Mf, in codon
Earlier
had not previously
at codon-448.
one in
of Kindred
studies
receptors
an alpha-helix
sequence
activation.
proline
is known
been
member
of different
mutagenesis
hormone
role of the single
proline-proline
little
In vitro
of the thyroid
important
degree, Although
the functions
of the receptors.
carboxy-terminus T3-binding.
to elucidate
mutation, A wastightly
an affected
(13).
now
resistance,
for the syndrome.
to a comparable
have
hormone
in Kindred from
and imprecise.
gene
and another
receptors
T3-affinity
employed
thyroid
responsible
nuclear
receptor
generalized
The mutation
defect
cumbersome
hormone
to histidine)
(6,7).
molecular
salt-extracted are relatively
with
448 (proline
to arginine)
and is the likely
thyroid
placental
have 579
in vitro
using
range.
A receptor
products
P-receptor
was reported that
the filter-
translational
placental
this or
(18).
to be .8-7.4X Data
of The 1010
on the of .0138
also bound
only
nM. small
p-receptor.
A receptor its ability
report
for a T3 concentration
Kindred
whether
A and Mf receptors
which
to bind been
shown
affects
to thyroid to bind
itsT3-binding hormone
response
to thyroid
hormone
In
Vol.
171, No. 2, 1990
response
elements
c-erbA@
related
may reduce
proteins
receptor
the generalized with
elucidation
via a leucine
would thyroid
the Kindred
zipper
activating
function
form which
explain
why
mutant
of gene
(20).
The Kindred
of the c-erbAB with
normal
phenotype
A mutation
DNA-binding allele
in Kindred will
by c-erbA
through
Alternatively,
of T3-regulated
c-erbAj3
TX-receptors
regulation
and other
receptor
receptor.
the activity
one mutant
resistance
A and other
of the mechanisms
inhibits only
each other
the normal
a homodimer
herein, hormone
with
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
with
structure
heterodimer
may itself
as suggested
Such mechanisms
AND BIOPHYSICAL
(12, 19) and may interact
of a less active
the mutant
studies
as dimers
the transcriptional
the formation properties
BIOCHEMICAL
help
genes.
is required
for
A. Further in the
proteins.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT We wish to thank peA
Cary Weinberger
of the Scripps
Clinic,
San Diego,
California
for
101.
REFERENCES Refetoff 5. (1982) Am. J. Physiol. 243:E88-E98. :: Magner JA, Petrick P, Menezes-Ferreira M, and Weintraub BD. (1986) J. Endocrinol. Invest. 9:459-69. 3. Weinberger C, Thompson CC, Ong ES, Lebo R, Gruel DJ, Evans RM. (1986) Nature (Lond.). 324:641-46. 4. Drabkin H, Kao FT, Hartz J, Hartz I, Gazdar A, Weinberger C, Evans R, and Gerber M. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. SC;. USA. 85:9258-62. 5. Usala SJ, Bale AE, Gesundheit N, Weinberger C, Lash RW, Wondisford FE, McBride OW, and Weintraub, BD. (1988) Mol. Endocrinol. 2:1217-20. 6. Usala SJ, Tennyson GE, Bale AE, Lash RW, Gesundheit N, Wondisford FE, Accili D, Hauser Pand Weintraub, BD. (1990) 1. C/in. Invest. 85:93-100. 7. Sakurai A, Takeda K, Ain K, Ceccavelli P, Nakai A, Seino 5, Bell Cl, Refetoff 5, and DeGroot LJ. (1989) Proc. Nat/. Acad. Sci USA. 86:8977-8981. 8. lnoue A, Yamakawa J, Yukioka M, and Morisawa 5. (1983) Anal. Biochem. 134:176-183. C, Albert, VR, Evans, RM, and Rosenfeld, MG. 9. Glass, CK, Franc0 R, Weinberger (19871 Nature 329:738-741. 10. Sam&s HH, Forman BM, Horowitz, ZD, and Ye ZS. (1988) J. Clin. Invest. 81:957-967. 11. Wondisford, FE, Farr EA, Radovick, 5, Steinfelder, HJ, Moates, JM, McClaskey, JH, and Weintraub, BD. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264:14601-14604. 12. Glass, CK, Holloway, JM, Devary, OV, and Rosenfeld, MG. (1988) Cell 54:313323. 13. Weintraub, BD, Usala SJ, Bale, AE, Gesundheit N, Weinberger C, Lash RW, Wondisford, FE, McBride OW, and Menezes-Ferreira, MM. “In Progress in Endocrinology,” ed. by H. Imura, pp. 797-802, Elsevier Science Publishers, B. V. Amsterdam, 1988. 14. Munoz A, Zenke M, Gehring U, Sap J, Beug H, and Vennstrom B. (1988)
EM60 1. 7: 155-I 59. 15. Horowitz ZD, Yang C, Forman BM, Casanova J, and Samuels HH. (1989) Mol. Endocrinol. 3: 148- 156. 16. O’Donnell AL, Koenig RJ. (f990) Mol. Endocrinol. 4:715-720. 17. Creighton, TE (1989) Proteins. p. 170. W. H. Freeman & Company, San Francisco.
18. Schueler PA, Schwartz HL, Strait KA, Mariash CN, and Oppenheimer JH. (1990) Mol. Endocrinol. 4:227-234. 19. Glass CK, tipkin SM, DeVary OV, Rosenfeld MG. (1989) Cell 59:697-708. 20. Forman BM, Yang C, Au M, Casanova J, Ghysdael J, Samuels HH. (1989) Mol. Endocrinol. 3 : 16 IO- 1626.