Genitourinary Raymond Michael
B. Dyer, MD Y. M. Chen, MD
Vicarious in Patients Ureteral
W. Gilpin, MD #{149} Ronald L Douglas Case, PhD
at intravenous
and
evi-
urogra-
occurs
with
greater
frequency when obstruction ciated with contrast material asation. Index
terms:
Contrast
Gallbladder, or obstruction, 82.84 82.1221
#{149}
Radiology
media, 762.91
effects,
762.91,
Ureter,
stenosis
#{149}
1990; 177:739-742
reprint
requests
#{176}RSNA, 1990
to R.B.D.
C
ONTRAST
materials
intravenously of the urinary most exclusively tion. Vicarious
nitrogen and creatinine levels obtained before or within 24 hours after the contmast material study were available for 41 patients.
administered
for opacification tract
are excreted by glomerular contrast material
alfiltracx-
cretion (VCME) has been considered a sign of impaired renal function (16). VCME has been reported in small series of patients with normal function, in whom it is most
sociated
with
unilateral
renal often as-
renal
disease,
such as umeteral obstruction (5,7-9). We undertook a retrospective study to determine the frequency with which VCME was seen on delayed radiogmaphs obtained following intravenous urography in patients with acute unilateral renal obstruction. Our findings indicate that VCME is
more
common
than
previously
preciated in these patients and more frequently when obstruction associated with contrast material tmavasation.
PATIENTS
is assoextrav-
I From the Department of Radiology, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, 300 5 Hawthorne Rd. Winston-Salem, NC 27103. From the 1989 RSNA scientific assembly. Received January 9, 1990; revision requested February 27; revision received June 22; accepted August 8. Ad-
dress
MD
Contrast Material Excretion with Acute Unilateral Obstruction’
phy, obtained at least 24 hours after injection of contrast material, were retrospectively studied. Vicarious contrast material excretion (VCME) as evidenced by gallbladder opacification on delayed radiographs was seen in 19 patients (42%), 10 of whom also showed extravasation of contrast material. A total of 15 of the 45 patients developed spontaneous extravasation; 10 (67%) showed VCME, while only nine of the 30 patients (30%) who did not have spontaneous extravasation of contrast material showed VCME. The creatinine level was elevated (>1.5 mg/dL [133 imol/L]) in four patients with VCME and in six patients without. This series indicates that VCME is more common than previously appreciated in patients with acute unilateral ureteral obstruction
Zagoria,
#{149}
Radiographs of 45 patients with dence of acute unilateral ureteral obstruction
J.
#{149} John
Radiology
AND
apoccurs is cx-
METHODS
Two hundred patients underwent intravenous urography between February 1986 and November 1988 to evaluate urinary tract obstruction. Patients with normal studies; evidence of chronic, bilateral, or postsurgical obstruction or obstruction in a solitary kidney; or radiologic evidence of cholecystectomy were cxcluded from review. Eighty-two patients were found to have acute unilateral obstruction from urinary tract stone disease. All intravenous urography was performed with use of a bolus injection of 100 mL of contrast material, and, in 45 patients, radiographs were obtained at least 24 hours after injection of contrast material. Those 45 patients, 41 men and four women ranging in age from 19 to 76 years (average, 44 years), made up the study group. A retrospective analysis was undertaken to determine the frequency of VCME as indicated by gallbladder opacification on the delayed radiographs. In
addition
to the presence
or absence
of
VCME, side and site of obstruction, stone size, and presence of spontaneous extravasation of contrast material as defined by Schwartz et a! (10) were noted. Blood urea
RESULTS Characteristics
of the
45 patients
are shown in Table 1 . Nineteen of the 45 patients (42%) had VCME as evidenced by gallbladder opacification.
Visualization
occurred graph
in four
alization, between tients, injection
of the
prior
gallbladder
to a 12-hour patients
4.5 hours after 12 and 24 hours and
more than in six patients
ization,
95 hours
patients atinine
with levels
mg/dL
[141-548
radio-
(earliest
24 hours (latest
after
VCME were
visu-
injection), in nine
injection).
were elevated
pa-
after visual-
All
male. Crc(1.6-6.2
smol/L])
in four
pa-
tients with VCME (two with and two without extravasation) and in six patients without VCME (1.7-2.1 mg/dL [150-185 mol/L]). Extravasation of contrast material
occurred (33%).
in 15 of the The
grade
45 patients
of extravasation
as
defined by Chapman et al (11), type of extravasation, and dose and type of contrast material in these 15 patients are listed in Table 2. Ten of the 15 patients (67%) with extmavasation had evidence of VCME (Fig 1), and nine of the 30 patients (30%) without extravasation
.043,
had
Yates
x2
VCME
corrected
2) (P
(Fig
method).
=
All
patients with extravasation of contrast material were male and all had small stones in the distal ureter. The stones were impacted at the uretero-
vesical
junction
in 10 of those
pa-
tients.
DISCUSSION In patients lam filtration,
with normal urographic
Abbreviation: VCME material excretion.
glomerucontrast
vicarious
ma-
contrast
739
:
‘a!.4
..,.e
.‘
I a.
b.
Figure
1.
(a) Radiograph
obtained
30 minutes
after
injection
of urographic
contrast
material
demonstrates
a persistent
dense
nephrogram
on the left. Calicectasis is noted, and fomnical rupture has occurred in the upper and midcalyceal groups, allowing entry of contrast material into the lymphatic system. Faint calcification is seen over the medial aspect of the right renal pelvis. (b) Radiograph of the right upper quadrant with the patient in the right posterior oblique position obtained 18 hours after injection of contrast material shows vicarious excretion of contrast material with opacification of the gallbladder. Several large radiolucent filling defects are identified within the gallbladder lumen (arrows), and a curvilinear calcification in the gallbladder neck, which proved to be a calcified gallstone, is also seen (arrowheads).
terial shows minimal hepatobiliary excretion. Less than 2% of the urographic dose of the diatrizoates and iothalamates is handled by hepatobiliary excretion (5,9,12,13), although this is the major alternative route of
contrast
material
excretion.
The
term
excretion has been used to describe biliary contrast material detected radiogmaphically following intravenous administration of contrast material. The initial reports of VCME following urographic dosage concerned vicarious
patients
with
postulated ular filtration mal disease
uremia
that
(1,2,4).
reduction due to renal led to prolonged
It was in glomerparenchyrecircu-
lation of contrast material with greatem protein binding as a result of prolonged intravascular contact. In addition, the acidosis often associated with uremia enhances the protein binding of the contrast molecule (5,14). Several isolated reports have appeared of VCME occurring in patients with normal renal function, most often associated with acute unilateral renal obstruction; however, the frequency of this occurrence is difficult to determine, and it has been considered rare (1,4,7). The mechanism proposed for the occurmence of VCME with acute unilateral renal obstruction is similar to that implicated in renal parenchymal dis740
Radiology
#{149}
Table 1 Characteristics of 45 Patients Ureteral Obstruction
with
Delayed
Radiographs No.
Characteristics Stone
and Acute
Unilateral
of Patients
With VCME
Without
VCME
size
Notseen 2mm
3mm Side of obstruction Right
Lelt Site of obstruction Proximal third Middle third Distal third Extravasation
1 10 8
3 5 18
11
9
8
17
0
3 3 20
2 17
Present
10
5
Absent
9
21
ease. It is thought that, despite the functioning of one kidney with normal glomerular filtration, obstruction of the other kidney increases circulation time sufficiently to allow protein binding in some instances. In addition, Shea and Pfister (5) have suggested that transient intracellular acidosis produced by obstruction may also increase protein binding, as does the acidosis that occurs in uremia. An additional factor that may prolong vascular contact of contrast materials in patients with acute unilateral renal obstruction, and thus pro-
mote
hepatobiliary
spontaneous First described
(15,16),
excretion,
spontaneous
sation
urinary
is thought
iologic structed
is
urinary extravasation. by Fuchs in 1930
“safety urinary
extrava-
to represent
valve” tract.
sure
within
the
may
cause
rupture
a phys-
for the Elevated
collecting
obpres-
system
of a caliceal
fomnix
more rarely, produce a direct tear in the renal pelvis. Contrast material then enters the renal sinus area or, less commonly, the venous or lymphatic system. With extensive cx(10,17)
or,
travasation, ter
the
contrast perirenal
material space
or dissect
December
may
eninfe-
1990
Figure 2. (a) Radiograph obtained 90 mmutes after intravenous administration of contrast material demonstrates a persistently dense nephrogram on the right, with mild pyelocaliectasis. Ureterectasis with columnization of contrast material is seen to the 1evel of a small stone (arrowhead) impacted at the ureterovesical junction. (b) Radiograph obtained 22 hours after injection of contrast material
demonstrates
opacification
of
the
gallbladder. The ureterovesical junction stone is again identified (arrowhead). No cxtravasation
was
seen
blood urea nitrogen were normal.
ous
renal
sence
this
in
and
or ureteral
patient,
and
creatinine
levels
surgery,
(c) abtract le-
of a destructive urinary (d) absence of external
sion,
trauma,
(e) absence of external compression, and (f) absence of pressure necrosis due to a stone. The presence of contrast
material
in the
soft
tissues,
circulation via the venous and phatic system, suggests increased
or me-
lym-
contact of contrast material with the vascular system by means of alternate routes of resorption. In early reports of this phenomenon, its occurrence was considered
rare.
b.
a.
Table 2 Relationship of Spontaneous with Extravasation
Urinary
Extravasation
and VCME
in the 15 Patients
Extravasation Patient No.
Grades
*
Type Type
3
Pyelosinus
1-
Diatrizoate
meglumine
1
Pyelolymphatic
+
Diatrizoate
meglumine
3 4
3 2
Pyelosinus/perirenal Pyelosinus
+ +
Diatrizoate Diatrizoate
meglumine meglumine
5
4
Pyelosinus/perirenal
6 7
4 4
Pyelosinus Pyelosinus
1
Pyelosinus
4 2 3 2 4 3 4
Pyelosinus Pyelosinus Pyelosinus Pyelosinus Pyelosinus Pyelosinus Pyelosinus
Numbers
refer
to the classification
and
pyelolymphatic
and
pyelolymphatic
+
Diatrizoate
meglumine
+ +
Diatrizoate Diatrizoate
meglumine meglumine
+
lohexol
+ +
Iohexol lohexol Diatrizoate
meglumine
lohexol Diatrizoate
meglumine
Diatrizoate Diatrizoate
meglumine meglumine
-
and
pyelolymphatic
-
of Chapman
et al (11): Grade
1
extravasation
grade 2 = extravasation about two or more calices or extending to the renal capsule, extravasation, and grade 4 periureteral/retroperitoneal extravasation. t + = patient experienced VCME, patient did not experience VCME. I Dose given to all patients was 100 mL.
riorly to outline variable lengths the ureter. Criteria proposed by Schwartz et al (10) for definition
Volume
of Materialt
1
8
pyelolymphatic
Contrast
2
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
and
VCMEt
177
Number
#{149}
3
of of
about grade
3
one
calix,
perirenal
spontaneous urinary extravasation include (a) absence of recent umeteral instrumentation, (b) absence of previ-
More
recently,
ranging in patients obstruction has been
from
pressure
of 80-100
frequencies
0.1% to 18% (11,18,19) with unilateral uretemal have been reported. It suggested that an absolute
mm
Hg
within
the collecting system is necessary to produce extravasation (18,20); in addition, the more rapid the rise in intrapelvic pressure, the more likely the occurrence of extravasation (1 1). Pressure within the collecting system is directly proportional to the degree and duration of acute obstruction and the dose and type of contrast material. Bernardino and McClennan (18) suggested that higher frequencies of extravasation can be expected with larger doses of contrast material and with use of high-osmolality contrast material because of the greater osmotic diuresis with resultant increase in collecting system pressure. In our series, extravasation occurred with use of both high(diatrizoate meglumine; Renografin-60, Squibb Diagnostics, Princeton, NJ) and low(iohexol; Omnipaque 300, Winthrop Pharmaceuticals, New York) osmolar contrast materials, but the difference was not significant. The presence of spontaneous unnary extravasation, with its release of pressure in the collecting system, tends to be associated with a more benign clinical course. Chapman et al (11), in a prospective series, noted that
patients
with
extravasation
Radiology
were #{149} 741
male, had less hydronephrosis, required less intervention for stones, and tended to have small stones (1-5
4.
Segall HD. Gallbladder visualization following the injection of diatrizoate. AJR
5.
Shea TE, Pfister RC. Opacification gallbladder by urographic contrast
vesical junction. Our series supports the tendency for distal stone impaction in patients with extravasation and the male preponderance. However, because our study included only four women, the association between sex and extravasation was not significant. The only postulated mechanism for male predominance
tients with extravasation had cvidence of VCME, and nine of the 30 patients without extravasation had VCME. The increased incidence of VCME in patients with extravasation was statistically significant. In view of the mechanism of VCME in patients with normal renal function, this association with extravasation is not unanticipated. Prolonged contact of contrast material with the vascular system promotes protein binding and may be enhanced by transitory acido-
in
sis associated
9.
mm)
impacted
the
at or near
occurrence
the
uretero-
of extravasation
of
with
obstruction.
which we are aware is that the male ureter is less compliant than the female ureter and, thus, more prone to the development of extravasation (11). Prior to the study, we had the impression that the occurrence of VCME was not rare. The occurrence of this phenomenon in patients with acute unilateral renal obstruction without other manifestations of renal parenchymal disease led to the retrospective analysis of the patient population described. Review of the creatmine levels in these patients revealed that elevated creatinine was more common in patients without VCME than in those with laboratory evidence of renal failure. A more common association in patients who developed VCME was the presence of spontaneous urinary extravasation. Spontaneous urinary extravasa-
The results from our series indicate that VCME in a patient population with acute unilateral ureteral obstruction is more common than has been previously reported. In addition, extravasation is believed to be more common than has been reported in the past and probably reflects current usage of higher doses of contrast material. In our series, the frequency of VCME may be artificially
tion
is not
generally
occurred
early
in the
course of urographic examination and was seen with both ionic and nonionic contrast materials. In some instances, this led to hospitalization, but, in most cases, delayed radiographs were obtained 24 hours or more after administration of contrast material for evaluation of stone migration because of the distal site of impaction and the anticipation of spontaneous passage. Among the 45 patients with delayed radiographs, VCME occurred in 42% and spontaneous urinary cxtravasation
in 33%.
Ten
of the
elevated
because
1969; 107:21-26.
AJR
6.
uncommon
in cases
1.
Becker Schwartz graphic
2.
15 pa3.
Arkless
R.
8.
10.
11.
12.
102:765-767. Holloway
A, Berdon
D. Vicarious media. Radiology
excretion 1968;
W, of urn90:243-
Clin
contrast North
media
Am
in
1972;
Gallbladder
H, Nance
on
excretory
J Urol
EP, Burks
1969; D, Winfield
creatinine. Invest Radiol 1988; 23:604-608. Schwartz A, Caine M, Hermann C, Bittermann W. Spontaneous renal extravasation during intravenous urography. AJR 1966; 98:27-40. Chapman JP, Gonzalez J, Diokno AC. Significance of urinary extravasation during renal colic. Urology 1987; 30:541-545. Ford KK, Wysong B, Thompson WM. Opacification
13.
seen
a case report.
AC. Vicarious excretion of contrast mcdiurn in patients without azotemia. Urology 1985; 25:201-203. Hopper KD, Weingast C, Rudikoff J, Thickman D. Vicarious excretion of water-soluble contrast media into the gallbladder in patients with normal serum
of the
intravenous
contrast
with
normal
renal
1983; Lautin
5:251-252. EM, Friedman
cretion
of contrast
gallbladder
following
injection
in patients
function.
Urol Radiol
AC.
Vicarious
media.
JAMA
cx-
1982;
247:1608-1610.
14.
15.
SokoloffJ, Talner cretion of sodium 1973; Fuchs
46:571-577. F. Cited
back-flow
17.
LB. The heterotopic cxiothalamate. Br J Radiol by: Olsson
in excretion
Acta Radiol
16.
0.
Studies
urography
on
(abstr).
1948; 30:501-502.
Fuchs F. Cited by: Sengpiel GW. Renal backflow in excretory urography. AJR 1957; 78:289-295. Harrow BR, Sloane
JA.
travasation
excretory
during
Pyelorenal
85:995-1005. ME, McClennan
cx-
urography.
J
18.
Urol 1961; Bernardino
19.
dose urography: incidence and relationship to spontaneous peripelvic extravasalion. AJR 1976; 127:373-376. Lindbom A. Fornix backflow in excretion
BL.
High
urography: its significance in the differential diagnosis of tuberculosis of the kid-
ney. Acta Radiol 1943: 24:411-418. Kohler R. Investigations on backflow retrograde
JA, Gregoire
Urographic
Radiol
urography:
20.
References
LB.
10:421-432. 7.
of obstruc-
tion and may be significantly increased in the presence of spontaneous urinary extravasation may obviate the necessity of invoking a renal failure mechanism when gallbladder opacification is detected in this patient population. U
1969; 107:763-768.
Talner uremia.
of hospitalization
for narcotic pain control and maintenance of a fasting state in anticipation of possible intervention in patients with a distally impacted stone. Both of these factors would favor increased concentration of urographic contrast material in the biliary systern. However, since only 45 of 82 patients had delayed radiographs, the overall frequency may yet be underestimated. An awareness that VCME
of the
media.
pyelography:
cal and clinical (suppl
study.
in
a roentgenologi-
Acta Radiol
1953;
99):1-92.
248. Chamberlain MJ, Sherwood T. The extrarenal excretion of d.iatrizoate in renal failure. Br J Radiol 1966; 39:765-770. Jancu J, Shapiro C. Extra-renal excretion of contrast material: a possible indicator of renal damage. Clin Radiol 1971; 22:219221.
742
Radiology
#{149}
December
1990