Vitamin
Jones, Burt P Koonsvitsky, Mary L Ebert, Lin, Birgit H Will, and John W Suttie The
potential
ABSTRACT tamin K status
was
living
Functional
subjects.
(E) assay]
assessed
concentrations
affected
by olestra.
Initial
olestra and placebo of 0.92 for normal
for 20 g olestra/d
in a 6-wk
study
different
between
intake
were
0.80
and
were 0.79
un-
for the
should
cating
20 g olestra/d
been
diaries subjects
was
low,
reflected
in those
diet
did
‘-‘#{243}O zg/
affect
mdi-
vitamin
sucrose
polyester,
vitamin
and
primary
dietary
is absorbed
source
by being
of vitamin
solubilized
K, is
nondigestible lipid in the intestinal with the absorption of fat-soluble
substances
of interference
(2-5).
lipophilicity
The
,
Olestra by gastric using
with
of the
usual
formed
name
from
solute
primarily
and
the
molecule.
the potential for 20 ingested chronically.
for the
mixture
the reaction
of hexa-
fat substitute is not absorbed
prothrombin
of long-chain
of the
ylated forms the impairment
design
shown
than
time
(PT)
that
complete
is not hydrolyzed
(7). Previous studies, as a measure, showed that
or partially
of vitamin K-dependent of vitamin K action
des-gamma
measurements
of vitamin
does
to reflect
changes
concentration
of
was to determine
affected
vitamin
if the ingestion
K status
concentration,
as measured
PT,
and
partial
(PTT).
and procedures was a double-blind, oftwo
health by laboratory
placebo-controlled,
groups
medical history, data. Vegetarians
ofnormal,
healthy,
carbox-
proteins resulting from (1 1, 12). These species can
parallel
de-
free-living aged
sub18-55
y
to be in good
physical examination, and and subjects on weight-loss
clinical diets
who might be consuming large amounts ofleafy vegetables, and people taking oral anticoagulants, were excluded. The study was approved by the study-site institutional review board (Pharmacobogy Research and Clinical Studies Institute, Fargo, ND). Signed informed consent was obtained from each subject. The subjects were randomly assigned within strata ofage, sex, and body mass index to yield two balanced groups. The groups consumed 20 g/d ofolestra or placebo (lard) in six cookies, eaten two
at each
meal,
chronic olestra
for 6 wk.
this amount
by the subjects
olestra does not affect vitamin K status (8-10). However, mdicators ofvitamin K status more sensitive than clotting times are now available. Recently developed methods allow the direct measurement
two adequacy
and methods
humans,
sucrose.
is a zero-calorie lipases (6) and
clinical
kinetics
and
and octaesters
acids
depends
in the intestine
study was to determine vitamin K status when
is the common
hepta-,
fatty
lipid
partitioning
The purpose ofthis g olestra/d to affect Olestra
degree
of nondigestible and
Subjects
sign consisting
in luminal
micelles (1). The presence ofa tract can potentially interfere on the amount
rapidly
phylloquinone
time
ofthe
of the
S:E was
of this study
thromboplastin
ratio
jects. One-hundred nine females and 1 12 males were enrolled in the study. They were determined
the
lipophilic
The
Echis of pro-
from
amount
(13).
in the diet
serum
The study
K, phyl-
bioavailability
Phylloquinone,
S:E,
Study
Introduction highly
objective
protease
of the total
K
199 1;53:943-6.
Olestra,
by
more
in blood
g olestra/d
venom
measure
synthesis.
K intake
phylloquinone
snake
(13).
a direct factor
in vitamin
the
quantification
in a bio-
measures,
not
K for clotting
of2O
that the
K status were unaffected decrease in phylloquinone
in the
Am J C/in Nutr
indicated
is therefore
The
serum concentrations, were not significantly
food
ofthe
availability
KEY WORDS
in the plasma
(S:E)
times
with
(E) allows
thrombin
Weekly
have
activation
carinatus
clotting
S:E values
groups.
whereas
[Simplastin#{174} (5)-Ecarin#{174}
classical
measures of vitamin where any significant
loquinone,
vifree-
olestra13
B Jones,
and
d. Sensitive population
status.
202
groups, respectively, compared with a value reference plasma. At week 6 the value was
phylloquinone
that
Michaelle
to affect
involving
consuming
prothrombin
0.81 for both groups. Mean phylloquinone expressed as differences from baseline, average
subjects
(14).
Twenty
intake of olestra was divided among
is unlikely
to be eaten
a food for delivering
On
the
of olestra
basis
of previous
studies
in
is expected
grams
to be well tolerated per day exceeds the estimated
under expected-use conditions. The all three meals because 20 g olestra
at a single
the olestra
meal.
because
Cookies
were
they represent
chosen
as
a realistic
I From the Procter & Gamble Company, Cincinnati, OH, Department of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison. 2 Supported by the Procter & Gamble Company, Cincinnati,
and
the
OH.
thromboplastin, eg, Simplastin (5; Warner Lambert, Morris Plains, NJ) allows quantification of the amount of carboxylated, biologically active prothrombin
reprint requests to KD Lawson, The Procter & Gamble Company, Winton Hill Technical Center, 6071 Center Hill Road, Cmcinnati, OH 45224. Received June 25, 1990. Accepted for publication October 17, 1990.
Am J C/in Nuir
for Ginical
also
plasma
be
assessed
by
functional
clotting
assays.
Activation
of
by a commercial
1991;S3:943-6.
Printed
in USA.
© 1991 American
Society
3
Address
Nutrition
943
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ajcn/article-abstract/53/4/943/4715070 by McMaster University Library user on 03 February 2019
D Yvonne Peter YT
K status of free-living
944
JONES
TABLE
ET
AL
1
Effect ofolestra
or placebo
ingestion
on phylboquinone
Group
nutriture4
Week 0
Week
2
Week
Week 6
4
S:E Olestra Placebo
Prothrombin
0.02 ± 0.02
0.78 0.79
0.44 0.53
±
± 0.02 ± 0.01
0.79 0.81
±
0.04 0.04
0.02 ± 0.01
0.33
± 0.02
0.37
±
0.55
± 0.04
0.55
±
0.8 1 ± 0.02 0.81 ± 0.01
(nmol/L)
time
±
0.04 0.07
0.40 0.48
0.04 ± 0.04 ±
(s)
Olestra Placebo Partial
±
12.2 12.2
thromboplastin
0.04 0.03
ND ND
ND ND
12.1 12.2
± 0.03
±
0.5
ND
ND
27.6
± 0.3
ND
ND
28.3
±0.3
±
±
0.03
time (s)
Olestra
30.7
±
Placebo
29.7
±0.5
4 1 ± SEM; n = 82 for olestra and n = 88 for placebo. S:E, ratio ofSimplastin#{174} to Ecarin#{174};ND, not determined. Repeated-measures analysis of variance (RMA) indicated no statistically significant differences between groups for S:E (P 0.87) or serum phylboquinone values expressed as differences from baseline (P = 0.22). RMA of absolute serum phylboquinone concentrations indicated a significant olestra effect (P = 0.002). Prothrombin time and partial thromboplastin time were not significantly different between groups at the P 0.05 level (Wilcoxon rank-sum test).
use of this material actual consumption.
and
provide
a simple
means
of calculating
samples were collected by venipuncture for and serum phylloquinone measurements at baseline and at weeks 2, 4, and 6. On days ofbbood collection, subjects Fasting
S:E,
blood
PT, PTf,
consumed
the
test
cookies
after
blood
was
taken.
and plasma were immediately frozen by immersion in ice-acetone bath and stored at -20 #{176}C until analyzed.
Serum
a dry Serum
phylboquinone
was
assayed
by using
methodology
based
on that
reported by Haroon et al (1 5). S:E measurement was based on procedures previously described (13, 16). Gotting times were determined by an accredited clinical laboratory (North Central Laboratories, Inc, Fargo, ND). The subjects were provided with weekly diaries and with prelisted
common
foods
(eg, green
vegetables,
eggs,
and cereals known to contain phylloquinone) to record their daily intake of those foods. phylboquinone
consumed
was
estimated
by using
standard
from
the
The
milk
and were asked daily intake of
amounts
food-composition
products,
of each
tables
food
(17).
Materials
Olestra was prepared from fatty acids from soybean oil and sucrose (18) and consisted of > 99% octa- and heptaesters. The composition ofthe fatty acids in the ester groups was C16, 10%; C18, 54%; C14:1 (cis), 20%; C18:2, 14%; others, < 2%. Vitamin Kfree triglyceride was used
OH)
Statistical
(lard
Cincinnati
Bakers
the placebo
Supply,
Cincinnati,
cookies.
analyses
phylloquinone
(RMA) serum performed
boquinone
to compare
oftreatment
and time
concentrations,
phylboquinone on differences
rank-sum groups
To account concentrations, from baseline
Analysis
test were with
on S:E and on
repeated-measures
was performed.
concentrations.
the Wilcoxon
Results Ninety-nine
subjects
in the olestra
completed
group
the study.
and
103 subjects
the placebo
group
Eleven
subjects
olestra group like cookies,
withdrew for the following reasons: two had job transfers, one had elective
in
in the
three did not surgery, one
had gastrointestinal distress, and four gave no reason. One olestra subject was disqualified for noncompliance. Seven placebo subjects did not complete the study: three gave no reason, two were disqualified
for noncompliance,
one
developed
mononucleosis,
and one developed gastroenteritis. The average amount of olestra consumed by the subjects completing the study was 19.7 g/d. Over 75% ofthe subjects reported that they ate all ofthe cookies. Only subjects who had consumed > 90% of the cookies and had blood samples collected and analyzed at all four time points were included in the statistical analyses. Eighty-two subjects in the olestra group and 88 in the placebo group met these criteria. Results of the analyses are shown in Table 1. Initial S:E values were 0.80 and 0.79 for the olestra and placebo groups,
respectively,
and
were
essentially
unchanged
during
the
study. The S:E values obtained from a normal reference plasma during the course ofthe study, with the reagents used to analyze the test samples, ranged from 0.87 to 0.99 (0.92 ± 0.03, ± SD). RMA of the S:E values showed no statistically significant differences between the groups (P 0.87). PT and PTT did not differ between groups at either measurement. There were no =
the effect serum
of variance in baseline yses were
from
to prepare
To determine
point
performed at each time point. SAS computer software (19) was used for all statistical calculations. All comparisons were made at the two-sided 0.05 significance level.
of variance
also performed
respect
analysis
for differences the same ofserum (ANOVA)
at each
to phylboquinone
analphyland
time serum
concentration and S:E. To test for differences in PT and PTT between groups, a t test and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test were
statistically RMA
significant of absolute
changes serum
in these
indices
phylloquinone effect (P = 0.002).
cated a significant olestra serum phylboquinone concentrations
with
time.
concentrations However,
ofthe
two groups
by 1 7% at baseline, therefore comparison baseline is more appropriate than comparison
of differences ofabsolute
mdithe mean
differed from values
for assessing potential treatment effects. The differences from were not significantly different (P 0.22) between the groups. Analysis of the data in terms of two subgroups, those baseline
=
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ajcn/article-abstract/53/4/943/4715070 by McMaster University Library user on 03 February 2019
Serum phylloquinone Olestra Placebo
0.80 0.79
OLESTRA with
initial
plasma
(0. 18 nmol/L), baseline
phylloquinone
produced
did
not
differ
above
the
same
or below
results.
significantly
AND the
placebo
from
for either
and
significance
groups
level,
in
trends
over
time
between
the
two
ofthe
food
diaries
indicated
that
ate an average of 57 zg phylloquinone/d group ate 64 &g/d. The difference between not statistically significant by RMA.
the olestra
quinone this
would
study
serum
considered
to be the
primary
have
had
indicator
of vitamin
K
been
they
hospital
value
et al (13)
was
found
diet.
that
in almost
a 50%
centrations,
from
21 was
after
9 d on the
d on
a restricted
reduced
decrease
ofthe
restricted values
this
were
range
sufficiency,
S:E
of the
laboratory
subjects
a condition
may where
reference have
any
plasma
been
at the
interference
was
0.92
borderline with
Mean
serum
within
spection
K
that
the
ofthe
they
normal food
were
of vitamin
intakes
of -60
L).
the borderline season (late
of the
restricted
diet
with
50 ig
phyllo-
only
increased
serum
phylloquinone
concentrations
from
0.95
to 1.25 nmol/L, a value significantly lower than the prerestricted value. PT values were not different between prerestricted and restricted periods. Measurement of urinary ‘y-carboxyglutamic acid
(Gla)excretion
intake urinary
confirmed the effect ofdietary phylloquinone assay. The results suggest that S:E and
on the S-E excretion rate are both
loquinone
concentration
more
sensitive
is to changes
than
serum
in phylloquinone
Gla phyl-
intake.
by Suttie No
et al (1 3) in their
and
from
0.44
to 2.4 nmol/L
in subjects
for whom
the
of the study. absorption
or
is greatly
Had under
two groups,
comparison
ofdifferences
from
baseline
the
is the most
during
which
resulted con-
with
decrease 500
increased
than
g/d
for
the serum
prerestricted
con-
in our study
pop-
nmol/L in this
amounts
than
the 80-tg/d
utilization
in excess
principal
mean
intake
of college
olestra these
students. moderate
of dietary
vitamin
sensitive
measure
in a subject
ofvitamin
The
and the was on
because of the (North Dakota)
affected
phylloquinone
of marginal
population
K status.
The
initial
vitamin
whose
that any significant have been reflected
decrease in phylloquinone by a change in status.
K
requirement.
possibly location
significantly conditions
daily
reported
detecting
of the
In-
showed
of the The
of
(20).
study
phylloquinone
the effect would have been detected. ingestion of 20 g olestra/d for 6 wk did not affect study
S:E, a
was conducted
K status
was
such
absorption should The power of the test
was such that a 10% difference in S:E between have been detected. Olestra also did not produce
groups would any significant
concentrations when the difconcentrations of the two Twenty g olestra/d cor29% ofthe mean total dietary
fat intake of average US adult males and females, respectively and represents a high chronic intake. The results of this study indicate that the chronic ingestion
assistance
between
diet
vegetables.
of vitamin K sufficiency, winter to early spring) and
phylloquinone
considerably
of the Suttie
the serum phylloquinone concentrations, data all suggest that our subject population
food-diary
of 20 g olestra/d
differed
30% diet.
phylloquinone
and
is capable
absorption
intake
in the normal range. The cloning times and the serum phylloquinone concentration data shown in Table 1 support the conclusion that olestra had no significant effect on vitamin K status. Because baseline serum concentrations
-
a significant
leafy population
methodology
in the
S:E values,
intake, The
liberal
K, green
;zg are lower
current
changes when
consuming
(2 1),
diet
of
restricted
subjects
ranged having
S:E remained
value
of 0.29-2.64
differences in serum phylloquinone ference between the initial serum groups were taken into consideration. responds to substitution of 19% and
stricted
an
of 1 .0 1 nmol/L, measured in a large population, but
ofthe
Other evidence ofthe lack ofcorrelation between absolute serum phylloquinone concentrations and vitamin K status, as measured by the S-E assay, is found in the work ofAllison Ct al(16). These researchers found that serum phylloquinone concentrations
from < 0.22 to 2.2 nmol/L in healthy adult male subjects subnormal S:E values after 9 d of a phylloquinone-re-
in 3 d after
concentrations
diaries
not
sources
Supplementation
by that
was substituted
77 to 37 g/d,
to greater
phylloquinone
intake or utilization by olestra would have been easily detected. The size of the test would have allowed a change of 0.08 in S:E to be detected with 80% power. The sensitivity of S:E to changes in vitamin K intake is illustrated by the work ofSuttie et al (13). These authors report that subjects who consumed a vitamin K-deficient diet for 3 wk showed a significant decrease in S:E (from 1.02 to 0.91) and in plasma phylboquinone concentrations (from 2.02 to 0.95 nmol/ quinone/d for 12 d, which raised the average phylloquinone intake to above the prerestricted amount, restored S:E values to 0.98 (not significantly different from prerestricted amounts) but
covered
centrations.
of
vitamin
concenphylbo-
observed
50%
and
S:E to prerestricted
the mean technique
the
(0.05
igJd)
serum
nmol/L,
concentrations
time
diet,
from
in mean
1.91 to 1.01
Supplementation
12 d returned
(2-5
A steady-state
reached
intake
the
fell
diet
ulation were lower than with the same analytical
the
group
et al (16)
concentrations
phylboquinone-free
starting
.
thus
for this
phylboquinone over the 6 wk
placebo
within
Allison
phylloquinone
study
RMA
groups
serum phylloquinone absorption of dietary
status in this study. At the start of the study, the mean S:E for the olestra group was 0.80 and for the placebo group was 0.79. At the end of6 wk, both groups had a mean S:E of0.8 1 Therefore, olestra did not affect vitamin K status as reflected by S:E. The normal S:E value depends upon the specific reagents. In ± 0.03,
in the
detected
occurred.
phylboquinone
in S:E. S:E was
effects.
the two
in mean serum (0.04 nmol/L)
group change
Significant changes in S:E and trations resulting from decreased
phylloquinone
Discussion
treatment
between
nmol/L).
for a normal
group
whereas the placebo the two groups was
potential
The net change
0.22).
=
for
difference
concentration for the olestra was not different from the
essentially
for any index.
Inspection
(P
index
olestra
The
to look
no significant
population We thank Pharmacology
will
not
affect
under
expected
James
D Carlson,
Research in conducting phylboquinone analyses.
vitamin
usage Albert
K status
of the
conditions. Dicta, Jr, and Karen
general
B Stein of
and Clinical Studies Institute, Fargo, ND, for this study and Melissa Kling for conducting the
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ajcn/article-abstract/53/4/943/4715070 by McMaster University Library user on 03 February 2019
0.05
subgroup.
way
showed
P values were 0.22 and 0.06 for the above-median and below-median subgroups, respectively. ANOVA indicated that the absolute serum phylloquinone concentrations were statistically significantly different (P 0.05) between the two groups at weeks 2 and 4 but not at week 6. The subjects tended to be consistent in all indices across the study. There was no statistically significant difference, at the two-sided
groups
945
K STATUS
meaningful
median
Differences
between
VITAMIN
946
JONES
References
and response
AC. Production of “prothrombin defito vitamins A, D and K. Proc Soc Exp Biol Ivy
1940;43:240-S.
5. Matschiner
JT, Amelotti
JM,
Doisy
EA. Mechanism
of the effect
of retinoic acid and squalene on vitamin K deficiency in the rat. J Nuts 1967;9l:303-6. 6. Mattson FH, Volpenhein PA. Hydrolysis offully esterified aboohols containing from one to eight hydroxy groups by the lipolytic enzymes of rat pancreatic juice. J Lipid Res 1972;l3:325-8. 7. Mattson FH, Volpenhein RA. Rate and extent ofabsorption of the fatty acids offully esterified glycerol, erythritol, xylitol, and sucrose as measured in thoracic duct cannulated rats. J Nuts l972;102:1l7780. 8. Glueck Ci, Hastings MM, Allen C, et al. Sucrose polyester and covert caloric
dilution.
Am J Gin
Nutr Ri, Taulbee
9. Mellies Mi, Jandacek controlled study of sucrose
1982;3S:l3S2-9. JD, et al. A double-blind
polyester
in hypercholesterolemic
placebo-
out-
patients. Am J Gin Nutr 1983;37:339-.46. 10. Mellies MJ, Vitale C, Jandacek RJ, Lamkin GE, Glueck 0. The substitution of sucrose polyester for dietary fat in obese, hypercho-
lesterolemic I I. Blanchard munoassays functional
outpatients. RA, Furie
Am J Clin Nutr BC, Kruger
GW,
198S;4l:1-12.
Jorgensen Mi, Furie B. Imof human prothrombin species which correlate with coagulant activities. J Lab Gin Med l983;l0l:242-S5.
JC, Suttie JW. Abnormal prothrombin rat. Thromb Res 1984;35:45l-8.
13. Suttie JW, Mummah-Schendel LL, Shah Vitamin K deficiency from dietary vitamin
in the
DV, Lyle N, Greger JL. K restriction in humans.
Am J Clin Nutr 1988;47:47S-80. 14. Grundy sucrose
SM, Anastasia JV, Kesaniemi polyester on plasma lipoproteins,
YA, Abrams J. Influence and cholesterol metabolism
of
in obese patients with and without diabetes mellitus. Am J Gin Nutr l986;44:620-9. 15. Haroon Y, Bacon DS, Sadowski JA. Liquid-chromatographic determination of vitamin K1 in plasma, with fluorometric detection. Gin Chem l986;32:192S-9. 16. Affison PM, Mummah-Schendel LL, lUndberg CO. Harms S, Bang NU, Suttie JW. Effects ofa vitamin K-deficient diet and antibiotics in normal human volunteers. J Lab Clin Med 1987;110:180-8. 17. Pennington JAT, Church HN. Bowes & Church’s food values of portions commonly used. 14th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1985. 18. Rizzi GP, Taylor HM. A solvent-free J Am Oil Chem Soc 1978;SS:398-401.
synthesis
ofsucrose
polyester.
19. SAS Institute Inc. SAS user’s guide: statistics, version 5 edition. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc, 1985. 20. Sadowski JA, Hood 5, Dallal GE, et al. Phylloquinone in plasma from elderly and young adults factors influencing its concentration.
Am J Gin Nutr 21.
1989;S0:
100-8.
Nutrition Monitoring Division, US Department ofAgriculture. Nationwide food consumption survey. Continuing survey offood intake by individuals, 1 day food intake diary men and women 19-50 and
the women’s children b-S weighted to be nationally representative, Spring, 1985. Hyattsville, MD: US Department of Agriculture, 1986.
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ajcn/article-abstract/53/4/943/4715070 by McMaster University Library user on 03 February 2019
MC, Isaacs B,
ciency” Med
AL 12. Shah DV, Swanson vitamin K-deficient
1. Kuksis A. Absorption of fat-soluble vitamins. In: Kuksis A, ed. Fat absorption. Vol 2. Boca Baton, FL: CRC Press, 1987:65-86. 2. Jandacek Ri. The effect of nonabsorbable lipids on the intestinal absorption oflipophiles. Drug Metab Rev l982;1 3:69-714. 3. Matschiner JT, Hsia SL, Doisy EA. Effect of indigestible oils on vitamin K deficiency in the rat. J Nuts 1967;9 1:299-302.
4. Elliott
ET