Neuroradiology Alessandro Bozzao, Antonio Barile, MD
MD #{149}Massimo Gallucci, MD #{149}Roberto Passariello, MD
Carlo
#{149}
Masciocchi,
MD
Italo
#{149}
Aprile,
MD
Lumbar Disk Herniation: MR Imaging Assessment ofNatural History in Patients Treated without Surgery’ The aim of this study was to evaluate the evolution of lumbar disk herniation in patients treated without surgery. Sixty-nine patients with a lumbar disk herniation proved at magnetic resonance (MR) imaging underwent
a follow-up
MR
imaging
study. The disk herniations evaluated during both MR imaging examinations were measured and classified into four categories according to the change in size that occurred. The patients were also divided into three clinical classes on the basis of the clinical outcome. Sixty-three percent of the patients showed a reduction of disk herniation of more than 30% (48% had a reduction of more than 70%),
while
only
8%
demonstrated
worsening of the clinical picture. These findings suggest that lumbar disk herniation may be primarily a medical (nonsurgical) disease and that MR imaging could play an important role in management of and research into the disorder. Index
terms:
intervertebral 33.1214 Radiology
Spine, disks,
1992;
diseases, 33.7831
33.7831 #{149} Spine,
a.
b.
Figure 1. Evaluation herniation
MR images from evaluation was performed by means was present. Volume was
of volume of spinal canal (a) and disk herniation of surface measurements at the level at which the then obtained by means of dedicated software.
(b). disk
#{149} Spine,
MR.
185:135-141
I From the Department of Radiology, University of Rome “La Sapienza,” Policlinico Umberto I, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161 Rome, Italy (A. Bozzao, R.P.); and the Department of Radiology, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy (MG., CM., IA., A. Barile). From the 1991 RSNA scientific assembly. Received December 10, 1991; revision requested January 30, 1992; final revision received May 11; accepted May 14. Address reprint requests to A. Bozzao. C RSNA, 1992
S
reduction of disk herniation (RDH) in the lumbar spine has been described (1-8). Reduction or disappearance of acute back pain or sciatica after nonsurgical treatment of lumbar disk lesions is known to occur (9-13). Nevertheless, to our knowledge, no investigators have correlated-on the basis of a
ties in restudying patients considerable period has initial diagnosis.
prospective
these findings are not supported by statistically significant data. Studies concerning the clinical evaluation of patients treated nonoperatively define a good outcome as an RDH of 70%-90% (2,8,10-12). We performed a prospective follow-up MR imaging study of 69 patients with diagnosed disk herniation. They all had radicu-
PONTANEOUS
study-the
evolution
of disk herniation with the clinical course of the disease. Since there have been no studies of large series of patients undergoing conservative treatment after radiologic diagnosis of disk herniation, to our knowledge, an indepth analysis of the natural evolution of this disease has not yet been made. This has probably been due to use of invasive procedures before the advent of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and also to the practical difficul-
Perithecal
fibrosis
when elapsed
is thought
a since
to be a
common complication of disk herniation; moreover, the worse neurologic outcome is considered to be related long compression of nerve roots by
nuclear
Abbreviation:
material
RDH
(13,14).
=
reduction
to
However,
of disk
herni-
ation.
135
Figure 2. RDH of more than (b) Follow-up image obtained
70% (arrows). (a) Initial 9 months later.
proton-density
sagittal
image.
a.
#{149}-.:
b.
4.
Figure itial
I-
a. 3. RDH of more than 70% (arrows). obtained 11 months later.
(a) Initial
axial TI-weighted
image.
(b) Follow-up
lar
or lumbar
conservative
pain
and
were
given
is no longer
while the remaining 98 (82%) gone conservative treatment. treat patients surgically were
treatment.
basis
PATIENTS
AND
of severity
of radicular myography,
METHODS
Among 978 lumbar MR imaging examinations performed at our institution during the past 2 years, diagnosis of disk herniation was made in 253 patients. Of
sent. Most
these,
The
tacted;
136
120
were
22 (18%)
#{149} Radiology
randomly
had
chosen
undergone
and
surgery,
con-
obtained
high intensity Also
of clinical
than
majority
signs,
presence
distress as shown with and granting of patient
of the patients
vatively were confined after the acute event; manipulation
had underDecisions to made on the
or therapy
of them
one therapeutic
treated
electrocon-
conser-
to bed for 2 weeks others underwent for
underwent
procedure.
symptoms.
more
of 30%-70%
T2-weighted
up image
V.
Figure image
RDH
sagittal
note
13 months
inside evident
on
L4-5
to undergo then offered
without
Note
in a; this
follow-up
of the
The opportunity MR imaging was
treated
later.
the
(a) In-
(b) Follow-
disk herniation
dehydration
patients
(arrows).
image.
image. disk.
follow-up to the 98
surgery.
Twenty-
nine refused, mostly because they were in good clinical condition; 69 accepted. Forty-three subjects had been referred for leg pain that started 1-3 months before the
pain time
was
first
examination
and
or lumbodynia
lasting
(up to I year). made:
The
26 for
No age-based
youngest
lumbar
for a longer patient
selection was
October
23
1992
months) after initial MR imaging of the same 0.5-T superconducting
Table 1 Relationship
between
Morphologic
Groups
and Clinical
Clinical Morphologic Group
Classes
ment
A
B
C
19(61) 0(0) 0(0)
9(29) 7(70) 11(58)
3(10) 3(30) 8(42)
31(48)
4
0(0)
0(0)
5(100)
All
19 (29)
27 (42)
5(8) 65(100)
Note-Numbers Numbers t Numbers *
are numbers
in parentheses in parentheses
of patients.
are percentages are percentages
of morphologic of total study
MIt
10(15)
19(29)
19 (29)
group. population.
between
Morphologic
Clinical
and Location
Groups
of Disk
Herniation
(period
Location*
Morphologic Group
Posterolateral
1 2
17(55) 5 (50)
3
11(58)
4
3 (60) 36 (55)
All Note-Numbers *
are numbers
Numbers
in parentheses
Median
Intraforaminal
11(35) 3 (30)
6(32) 1 (20) 21 (32)
of patients.
are percentages
of morphologic
are percentages
of total
group.
in parentheses
study
evaluation
was performed
at
of rest in bed or absence
from
work), and working capacity (unchanged or diminished), with use of a method described by Pearce and Moll (II). For each
MIt
3(10) 2 (20)
31(48) 10 (15)
analysis,
2(11)
19(29)
clinical
1 (20) 8 (12)
(8) 6(100)
were considered: complete regression (class A), partial remission or stable picture (class B), and progression of cal symptoms (class C). Both parametric and nonparametric tistics were used. This decision was because some of the variables were
(Percentages
may
not add
used.
up to
of rounding.)
100% because t Numbers
Genoa,
the time of the second MR study by using parameters such as physical signs (limitalion of spinal flexion and straight leg raising, motor or sensory dysfunction, tendon reflex change, and muscle wasting), severity of recurrence or acute exacerbation
Table
2 Relationship
MR 5000; Esaote,
Italy) and technique. According to the volumetnc values and the relative modifications shown on the two sets of MR images, we divided the patients into four groups: those with an RDH of more than 70% (group 1) (Figs 2, 3), those with an RDH of 30%-70% (group 2) (Fig 4), those with no change in amount of disk herniation (group 3), and those with an increase in disk herniation (group 4).
Class*
1 2 3
(Esatom
with use equip-
population.
a threeThis
or four-level
resulted
classes
normally
score
in formation
when
the
distributed
overall
and
results
others
Groups
Morphologic
and Size of Disk
Herniation
Size*
Package
Morphologic
used
Group
Small
MIt 31(48) 10(15) 19(29)
6(19) 4(40) 15(79)
19(61) 5(50) 3(16)
6(19) 1(10) 1(5)
4
2 (40)
3 (60)
0 (0)
Note-Numbers
27(42) are numbers
Numbers
100% because t Numbers
Large
1 2 3 All
*
Medium
30(46)
of patients.
in parentheses of rounding.)
are percentages
of morphologic
group.
in parentheses
are percentages
of total study population.
(Percentages
for
Of the
65 (100)
may not add up to
this
reason,
the
statistical
out in 41 cases, in 32 of which signs of radicular distress were demonstrated. Sagittal (1,800/30-120 and 500/30 [repetition time msec/echo time msecj, with two
echo
excitations)
and
axial
(500/30)
sequences were used. The was 256 x 256, with a 5-mm
spin-
image masection
parallel
to the inferior
verte-
bral plate. Only when a focal protrusion in the disk (best evaluated on the axial image) or a detached fragment was shown was the patient admitted to the study. The combined evaluation of axial and sagittal images allowed us to exclude bulging
disks.
ages and a 3-mm section thickness with a I-mm gap for axial images. Sagittal images were acquired by placing the central seclion in the midline of the spinal canal, as visualized on a low-quality axial image used as a reference. This axial image was acquired at L4-5 only after correct alignment of the lumbar spine was shown on a low-quality coronal image used as a reference. Axial images were acquired by using
Volumetric evaluation of disk hernialion was performed in the sagittal and axial planes with use of the dedicated software of the imager (Fig 1). The size of the disk herniations was related to that of the spinal canal at the same level as the disk herniation. This allowed us to classify them as small when they ifiled 25% or less of the spinal canal, as medium when they filled 26%-50% of the spinal canal, and as large when they filled more than 50% of the spinal canal. Follow-up MR imaging
the midsagittal
was performed
trix
thickness
Volume
with
185
a 1-mm
image Number
#{149}
gap for sagittal
as a reference; 1
im-
they
6-15 months
(average,
Sciences
69 patients
Ii
they
(SPSS)
admitted
were
was
to the
excluded
analysis.
were
Disk
posterolateral
median
involved placed
Social
final protocol, four had new disk herniations located at a different level than the original disk herniation. For
lions
were
the
in the analysis.
and
years and the oldest 65 years (average age, 52 years). Electromyography was carried
as
were
RESULTS
(8)
8(12)
stamade not
scored on an ordinal scale. The Pearson R and x2 tests were used to evaluate correlalions between variables. The Statistical
Table
between
clinical clini-
such
RDH and size of disk herniations 3 Relationship
was
of three
in 21;
the
neural
from
hernia-
in 36 cases
in eight
cases,
foramen.
they
There
were
27 small,
large RDH
herniations. Results concerning and symptoms, RDH and loca-
tion,
are
and
given
30 medium,
RDH
and
in Tables
lively. Thirty-one an RDH higher
and
size
eight
of herniations
1, 2, and
patients than 70%
3, respec-
(48%) (group
had 1),
10 (15%) had an RDH of 30%-70% (group 2), 19 (29%) showed no change in amount of disk herniation (group 3), and five (8%) had an increase in disk herniation (group 4). Statistically significant correlations (P < .05) were found between changes in size and amount of herniation (Pearson R = .40953, P = .0004); no correlations were found between
RDH
(x2
and =
location
1.39010,
P
of disk =
.9665).
herniation The
Radiology
distribu#{149} 137
b.
Figure
(a) Sagittal
6.
hypenntense
disk
L4-5. (b) Follow-up later. intensity
d.
C.
Figure
5.
(a, c) Sagittal
(a) and
at L5-S1. (b, d) Sagittal evident unlikely.
in b and
axial
(c) Ti-weighted
(b) and axial (d) follow-up
d (arrows);
however,
regression
RDH
images
images
of large
obtained
of this
large
disk
herniation
12 months
herniation
the
is evident is reduced
RDH
disk
study
have
performed
of patients’
logic
groups
not show differences.
ages
and any
in the
clinical
statistically
morpho-
classes
did
significant
tion who received ment. Nevertheless,
patients
(3,4). tion
Spontaneous regression of disk herniation at repeat epidurography has been described since 1945 (6). CT has proved to be an excellent tool for fol-
138
of patients Radiology
#{149}
with
disk
hernia-
has
been
examinations imaging. studies, follow-up
been
MR
up with therapy
change in size after chemonucleolysis. However, in these studies, the timing
prospective hernia(1,2,8). In
of disk
done
have been knowledge,
found. in no
performed (15-18). suggest herniations
evalua-
followed
knowledge,
RDH to our
both
with
treatstudies,
studies in which follow-up evalualions were performed, a high success rate for conservative treatment and
substantial However,
as well.
conservative in most
evaluation
not been
8 months the high
lions have been chemonucleolysis cases, the results majority of disk
because of persisting after conservative
To our
follow-up
DISCUSSION
low-up
have
CT mostly symptoms
image obtained in b (arrows);
of
at
is
seems
In other tion
image
(arrows)
(arrows)
later.
into
T2-weighted
herniation
after In most that the do not
of follow-up after therapy was usually considerably shorter than in our study (only 3 months); when this interval was longer, the size of disk herniations was found to decrease (16).
In our study, we performed MR imaging in a large series of patients with
disk
herniation.
The
population
October
1992
d.
C.
Figure 7. herniation
(a, c) Sagittal (arrowheads)
proton-density surrounded
(a) and by epidural
(possibly
axial Ti-weighted tissue (arrows)
from the disk itself. (b, d) Sagittal proton-density ages obtained 6 months later. Reduction of the
epidural
arrows
but much
in d); the disk herniation
Note presence
of a new hyperintense
son, the patient
contacted study
patients
was not included
in the was
is unchanged,
first
narrowed
treated
phase
of the
to the
group
conservatively.
of
This
introduced a bias into the study, since it restricted our findings to the group of patients treated without surgery. However, the selection of these patients was done randomly and without considering the clinical outcome of the conservative treatment. Moreover, the same procedure (O.5-T MR
Volume
185
Number
#{149}
1
(b) and axial Ti-weighted
disk herniation in the protocol
(c) images of L5-S1 disk that is clearly differentiable
tissue
is evident
less dural
(top arrow
(d) follow-up (bottom
compression
arrow
imin b,
is evident.
representing
ices) are evident. tamed 5 months associated with
vessels
or venous
var-
(b) Follow-up image oblater. There is mild RDH substantial reduction of dural
compression by the epidural no longer evident.
tissue,
which
operated follow-up
on MR
is
in b) at L4-5. (For this rea-
study.)
imaging) sequences) the initial thus
(other volume ences
and technique (the same were employed in both and follow-up evaluations,
avoiding
methodologic
than those averaging in image
patients and did
biases
related to partial and subtle differalignment).
who were not undergo
imaging were in good clinical condilion (this was the main reason why they did not undergo follow-up), the rate of RDH could have been even higher.
The study demonstrated a high rate of RDH (63% [groups 1 and 2]) and a
The clinical disk herniation
low prevalence niation (8%
ing nonsurgical described (8-11).
of increased
[group
4]). Since
not
disk
most
her-
evolution of lumbar in patients undergotreatment has Most studies
Radiology
been report
139
#{149}
a satisfactory
response
in over
70%
of
cases. These results were confirmed our study, with a good clinical outcome
(classes
A and
lients
treated
conservatively.
lief
of pain
subsidence
occurs acute lions
within event. between
To
should (This
since
it was
The
exact
anulus,
(1,7,19).
by means of tears fragmentation
and
When
nuclear
outside
the
different desiccation, material
resorption
of disk
phase there
of the
that supported sible causes.
On
a.
epi-
events such as and phagocymay occur. The
material
no
by the lack and the inin the
In our
any one of these the basis of our
images
and
b. 9.
Reduction
Ti-weighted
of more
image.
a decrease
than
(b) Follow-up
70%
of posterolateral
image
obtained
no
data
to support
posfind-
in
to a tranother such high
signal intensity in up to 80% of sequestered intervertebral disks. Idenlification of epidural granula-
the
theory
that this tissue is related to granulalion rather than fibrosis and that it has a role in RDH. A prospective MR imaging study that used gadolinium this
signal intensity was observed at follow-up MR imaging (Figs 4, 6). The high intensity of the herniated frag-
ment is thought to be due sient gain in water content; studies (20) have reported
have
enhancement
observations
ings, regression of large herniations into the anulus seems unlikely (Fig 5). Dehydration may have occurred in those cases in which the disk fragment was hyperintense on T2-
weighted
Figure
LS-Si
iO months
to show
the
details
of
would
found between size of disk herat initial MR imaging and at follow-up MR imaging. These
correlations
indicate
disk most
herniations frequently
size
(Fig 5). A possible
that
medical
explanation
for
Bolognese,”
we did hancement
140
not
or absorbing
reduced (Figs
at fol7, 8). Since
perform gadolinium or histologic analysis,
Radiology
#{149}
to
enwe
in prevalence
nisms of RDH In conclusion,
that
in patients
between and the
important disease
MR role as well
#{149}
research.
We thank all the friends Primavera Neuroradiologica
especially
Giovanni
Ruggiero,
pres-
References SaalJA,
SaalJS,
history
of lumbar
sion
treated
Herzog RJ. intervertebral nonoperatively.
The
natural disc extruSpine 1990;
15:683-686. 2.
3.
or mecha-
as regards its site. our findings show
undergoing
the
ident of the club, for their helpful suggestions and Elena Vinci for assistance in manuscript preparation.
live treatment for lumbar spine disk hernialion, there is a high frequency of regression of herniated material and a low frequency of progression
of digesting
hernialion). is thought
between
disease.
play an of this
Acknowledgments: of the “Club Della
that was markedly low-up MR imaging
be capable
disk
tissue
(nonsurgical)
as in future
4.
with
and
interval
in
this finding could be that the larger the disk hernialion, the more extensive is the active scar around it. This could facilitate digestion of disk mate-
rial. No relationship was found the location of the herniation
herniation
the
imaging could in management
the largest
are the ones that tend to decrease
disk
and
two MR imaging examinations; a positive correlation was found between the size of the disk hernialion and the amount of regression. We believe our findings may support the theory that lumbar disk hernialion is primarily a
substantially improve our knowledge of the process. Statistically significant correlations were niation RDH
process
between
RDH
differences
Gadolinium enhancement greatly improves identification of this tissue, as reported by Ross et al (21) (in six of
patients
axial
of the
disk material (7) as well as other epidural fragments, such as displaced bone grafts (22). In our study, we occasionally observed epidural tissue
lion tissue around the herniated disk is not possible on plain MR images.
granulation
(a) Initial
were the location
1.
seven
herniation.
the disease. No relationships found between RDH and
amount of regression (Fig 9). The high prevalence of median disk hernialions was not in accordance with the results of other studies (19). A possible explanation for this discrepancy could be the lower prevalence of radicular distress in our study, leading to less frequent surgical treatment. In any case, our findings demonstrated no
The
disk
later.
is related
disease.
were
is lo-
in the
to the lack of nutrients supplied the disk; desiccation is due to of hydrophilic proteoglycans, phagocytosis is stimulated by flammatory response present study,
in
material
anulus
dural space, resorption, tosis of the
acute
and
or months of the close correla-
weeks obtain
bly dehydration disk material, into the anulus
cated
edema
and fibrotic changes material and usually
be measured at the same was not done in our study, not the aim of the study). mechanism of RDH is The main causes are probaand shrinkage of the regression of the disk
unknown.
the
sleeve
reto
the clinical signs and changes, the two param-
morphologic eters time.
The
to be due
of root
to inflammatory around the disk
% of pa-
B) in 71
is thought
in
5.
conserva6.
of
Pardatscher K, Fiore DL, Barbiero A. The natural history of lumbar disc herniations assessed by a CT follow-up study. Neuroradiology 1991; 33(suppl):84-85. TeplickJG, Haskin ME. Spontaneous regression of herniated nucleus pulposus. AJNR 1985; 6:331-335. Guinto FC Jr. Hashim H, Stumer M. CT demonstration of disc regression after conservative therapy. AJNR 1984; 5:632-637. Mathews JA, Yates DAH. Reduction of lumbar disc prolapse by manipulation. Br Med J 1969; 3:696-697. Key JA. The conservative and operative treatment of lesions of the intervertebral disc in the low back Surgery 1945; 17:291303.
October
1992
7.
8.
9.
K, Hultqvist C. Absorption of protruded disc tissue. J Bonejoint Surg [Ami 1950; 32:557-560. Kohler D, Langer M, Schultz U, Weiss T, Stabler A. Clinical and computed tomography follow-up of conservatively treated disc prolapse. Rontgenblatter 1989; 42:346351. Saal JA, Saal JS. The nonoperative treatment of herniated nudeus pulposus with radiculopathy:
10.
ii.
an outcome
study.
clinical
14.
15.
and of
16.
KoningsJG, Computerized
17.
18.
Surg
[Br] 1984;
Williams
185
#{149} Number
1
19.
20.
21.
66:41?.-421.
FJB, Deutman
tomography
(CT)
of the effects of chemonudeolysis. thop 1986; 206:32-36. Gentry LR, Turshi PA, Strother MJ, SackettJF. Chymopapain
R. analysis
Clin OrQvl,Javid
chemonu-
22.
JinkinsJR, Whittemore AR, Bradley WG. The autonomic syndrome associated with lumbar disc extrusion. AJNR 1989; 10:219231. Masaryk 17, RossJS, Modic MT, Bournphrey F, Bohiman H, Wilber C. High resolution MR imaging of sequestered lumbar intervertebral disks. AJNR 1988; 9:351-358. RossJS, Modic MT, Masaryk TJ, CarterJ, Marcus RE, Bohlman H. Assessment of extradural degenerative disease with GdDTPA-enhanced MR imaging: correlation with surgical and pathologic findings. AJNR 1990; 10:1243-1249. Hosking OR, McCormick CC. Resorption of intraspinal fragments of displaced bone graft following anterior spinal fusion. Aust N ZJ Surg 1990; 60:142-144.
deolysis: CT changes after treatment. AJR 1985; 145:361-369. Masaryk TJ, Boumphrey F, Modic MT, Tamborrello C, RossJS, Brown MD. Ef-
feds of chemonudeolysis.J Tomogr 1986; 10:917-923.
Volume
1979;
The effects of chemonudeolysis as demonstrated by computerised tomography. J
30:13-17.
M, Fujiwara M. Epidemiologic studies of long term prognosis
Spine
4:150-155. Finneson BE. Low back pain. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1973; 173. Hakelius A, HindmarschJ. The comprehensive reliability of preoperative diagnostic methods in lumbar disc surgery. Acta Orthop Scand 1972; 43:234-238. KoningsJG, Williams FJB, Deutman R.
Bonejoint
disc hemiation: a controlled prospective study with ten years of observation. Spine 1983; 8:131-140. Pearce J, Moll JMH. Conservative treatment and natural history of acute lumbar disclesions.J NeurolNeurosurg Psychiatry Hasue
13.
Spine
1989; 14:431-437. Weber H. Lumbar
1967;
12.
low back pain and sciatica.
Lindblom
Comput
Assist
Radiology
#{149} 141