sensors Article
Multiport Circular Polarized RFID-Tag Antenna for UHF Sensor Applications Jamal Zaid 1, *, Abdulhadi Abdulhadi 1 , Arun Kesavan 1 , Yassin Belaizi 2 and Tayeb A. Denidni 1 1
2
*
Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique Centre Centre Énergie Matériaux Télécommunications 800, De La Gauchetière Ouest Bureau 6900, Montréal, QC H5A 1K6, Canada; [email protected] (A.A.); [email protected] (A.K.); [email protected] (T.A.D.) IES-UMR CNRS 5214 Université de Montpellier, 34095 Montpellier Cedex 5, France; [email protected] Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-438-993-9311
Received: 31 March 2017; Accepted: 30 June 2017; Published: 5 July 2017
Abstract: A circular polarized patch antenna for UHF RFID tag-based sensor applications is presented, with the circular polarization (CP) generated by a new antenna shape, an asymmetric stars shaped slotted microstrip patch antenna (CP-ASSSMP). Four stars etched on the patch allow the antenna’s size to be reduced by close to 20%. The proposed antenna is matched with two RFID chips via inductive-loop matching. The first chip is connected to a resistive sensor and acts as a sensor node, and the second is used as a reference node. The proposed antenna is used for two targets, serving as both reference and sensor simultaneously, thereby eliminating the need for a second antenna. Its reader can read the RFID chips at any orientation of the tag due to the CP. The measured reading range is about 25 m with mismatch polarization. The operating frequency band is 902–929 MHz for the two ports, which is covered by the US RFID band, and the axial-ratio bandwidth is about 7 MHz. In addition, the reader can also detect temperature, based on the minimum difference in the power required by the reference and sensor. Keywords: radio frequency identification (RFID); ultra-high frequency; reading range; sensor; passive tag antenna; multiport; circular polarization
1. Introduction UHF radio frequency identification (UHF-RFID) systems have become an attractive research topic in wireless communication networks due to the rapid expansion of RFID applications, including their use in asset tracking, security systems, remote wireless identification, purchasing, supply chain management, Internet of Things (IoT), and wireless sensor networks (WSNs) [1–9]. An RFID system consists of two parts, a reader and a tag. There are three kinds of RFID tags: passive, semi-passive, and active. Passive RFID tags have a long lifetime and are low-cost compared to active RFID tags. However, their reading range is shorter than that of active RFID tags. Basically, a passive RFID tag receives a signal from an RFID reader and then transmits a backscatter signal to the reader, allowing the reader to read the tag code. The UHF RFID frequency band is divided into sub-bands; each region has a specific frequency band such as the bands 908–914 MHz, 950–956 MHz, and 902–928 MHz utilized in South Korea, Japan, and North America, respectively. Microstrip antennas have many attractive features, including their planar structure, low cost, easy fabrication, and light weight, which have made them extremely popular and has led to their use in wireless communication networks, especially in RFID applications. RFID tags usually use a linear polarization (LP) [10–13]; however, these tags have a random orientation because they are commonly hand-held. To overcome this issue, the reader should use circular polarization (CP) to broaden the ability of the reader to receive signals from these tags independently of their orientation. In addition, Sensors 2017, 17, 1576; doi:10.3390/s17071576
www.mdpi.com/journal/sensors
Sensors 2017, 17, 1576
2 of 10
a mismatch of polarization could occur between readers and their tags, causing a loss of 3 dB from the signal, as well as reducing the reading range roughly 41% compared to a matched polarization [4]. Different techniques have been used to resolve this mismatch and to achieve CP operation for tags [1–9]. RFID-enabled multiple ports and sensor systems have become extremely attractive, offering a challenging topic for researchers due to their varied and useful applications [14–22]. To overcome the mismatch problems, a new antenna structure is proposed here, an asymmetricstar shaped slotted microstrip patch antenna (ASSSMP). This ASSSMP antenna can be etched on a patch to achieve CP operation, and it reduces the antenna size by roughly 20% compared to a conventional microstrip antenna. The proposed antenna is matched with two chips, one of which is used as a reference node and other connected to a sensor. The proposed antenna is matched with two ports, which eliminates the need for two antennas, as in [14–17]. While another work has also proposed using a single antenna that uses two ports [18], that one requires solar cells and a microcontroller, making its structure much more complicated than the one proposed here. Moreover, its patch size is larger and it is LP rather than CP. The proposed antenna has a reading range of about 25 m, achieved by using a linear-polarized reader (GAO). The proposed antenna has many desirable features, such as a simple structure, easy fabrication, low cost, compact size, is self-powered, and uses circular polarization, which means the reference node and sensor are in the same environmental conditions and receive the same power from the two reader chips at the same time and at any orientation. This aspect of similar conditions allows the use of a single antenna for the reference node and the resistive sensor, which improves the accuracy and sensitivity of the sensor system. The proposed antenna operates at the North America band (902–928 MHz), and it is matched with two tags at the center frequency of this band (915 MHz) by inductive loop matching. The sensor is operated based on the power difference between the reference node and the resistance node. This paper is organized in six sections. Section 1 is a review of RFID systems and sensors. The principles of the CP-ASSSMP are explained in the Section 2, followed by a description of the proposed antenna design in Section 3. Section 4 presents the RFID-based sensor concept, and Section 5 presents the simulated and measured results. Finally, the conclusions are presented in Section 6. 2. CP-ASSSMP Design Since RFIDs are generally used in portable or handheld systems, CP is preferable, because CP can receive a signal at any orientation (orientation diversity), thereby increasing the antenna’s ability to receive a signal and reducing multipath effects. The CP asymmetric-stars shaped slotted microstrip patch antenna (ASSSMP) was therefore designed to provide CP. Figure 1 shows the proposed antenna. The antenna is printed on an RO4003 substrate (εr = 3.55, tan (δ) = 0.0027 and thickness = 1.52 mm) and four stars are etched on the patch, as shown in Figure 1. The etched stars reduce the patch size and generate CP. They change the distribution of the current on the patch; the current increases the current path length, thereby increasing the electric size of the antenna, as well as shifting the resonance frequency downwards. Moreover, by slightly changing the size of the etched stars, two modes are created perpendicular to each other, generating CP. Figure 2 shows how much the simulated distribution surface current is changed, with four phase angles of 0◦ , 90◦ , 180◦ , and 270◦ . By using symmetric slot stars, the operating frequency is shifted downwards without CP. However, Asymmetric slot stars can achieve both a reduction in the size of the microstrip antenna and the CP. The position of the stars in the middle of each quarter and their size are defined as an exponential function as shown in Figure 3. Figure 4 shows how increasing the size of one star, (S1), shifts the resonance frequency down to a lower frequency. In addition, the axial ratio based on the electric size of the antenna increases by increasing the slot size as shown in Figure 5. From our parametric study, the best values of S1 are between 10.6 mm and 11.4 mm. Port one generates left-hand circular polarization (LHCP) and port two generates right-hand circular polarization (RHCP), as shown in Figure 2a,b, respectively. The CP ASSSMP is matched with two RFID chips by the inductive loop-matching technique; the inductive loops are designed to create conjugate matching
Sensors 2017, 17, 1576
3 of 10
(Z Antenna = Z*chip) between the antenna and the RFID chips. The RFID chip has an input impedance 2017,at 17,915 1576MHz, which is matched with the antenna by conjugating the impedance (24 3 of of (24Sensors − j190) + 10 j190), Sensors 2017, 17, 1576 3 of 10 as illustrated in Figure 6. The return losses of the reference node and the sensor node at half power j190), as illustrated in Figure 6. The return losses of the reference node and the sensor node at half coverj190), the North America RFID band MHz); and the coupling between the two as illustrated in Figure 6. The(902–929 return losses of the reference node and the sensor nodeports at halfat the power cover the North America RFID band (902–929 MHz); and the coupling between the two ports cover the North America RFID band (902–929 MHz); and the coupling between the two ports same power bandwidth is roughly −16 dB. at the same bandwidth is roughly −16 dB. at the same bandwidth is roughly −16 dB.
Figure Photo ofthe the fabricated fabricated antenna. antenna. Figure 1.Photo Photoof Figure 1.1. antenna.
(a) (a)
(b) (b) Figure 2. Simulated distribution surface current of the proposed antenna.
Figure 2. Simulated surface current distribution the proposed antenna for (a) port one and (b) port two. Figure 2. Simulated distributionofsurface current of the proposed antenna.
Sensors 2017, 17, 1576 Sensors 2017, 17, 1576 Sensors 2017, 17, 1576 Sensors 2017, 2017, 17, 17, 1576 1576 Sensors
4 of 10 4 of 10 4 of 10 of 10 10 44 of
Figure 3. The relation between the stars’ sizes. Figure The relation between the stars’ stars’ sizes. Figure3. 3.The Therelation relation between between the the sizes. Figure 3.3. the stars’sizes. sizes. Figure The relation between stars’
0
Return Loss, S22 S22 (dB)(dB) Return Loss, Return ReturnLoss, Loss,S22 S22(dB) (dB)
0 00 -10 -10 -10 -10 -20 -20 S1=10.2 mm -20 -20 S1=10.2mm mm S1=10.6 S1=10.2 mm S1=10.2 S1=10.6mm mm -30 S1=11.4 mm S1=10.6 mm -30 S1=10.6 S1=11.4mm mm S1=11.8 mm -30 S1=11.4 mm -30 S1=11.4 mm S1=11.8 mm S1=11 mm S1=11.8mm mm S1=11.8 S1=11 mm mm -40 S1=11 0.87 -40 S1=11 mm -40 0.87 -400.87 0.87
0.9 0.93 0.9 0.93 0.9 0.93 (GHz) 0.9Frequency 0.93 Frequency (GHz) (GHz) Frequency
0.96
0.96 0.96
0.96
Frequency (GHz)
Figure 4.4.Simulated return loss. loss. Figure4. Simulated return return Figure return loss. loss. Figure 4. Simulated Simulated Figure 4. Simulated return loss.
Axial Ratio (dB)(dB) Axial Ratio Axial AxialRatio Ratio(dB) (dB)
1010 10 10 88 8 8 66 6 6 4 44 4 2 22
2 00.89 00 0.89 0.89
0 0.89
S1=10.6 S1=10.6mm mm S1=10.6 mm S1=11 mm S1=11 mm S1=10.6 mm S1=11 mm S1=11.4 mm S1=11.4 mm S1=11 mm S1=11.4 mm S1=10.2mm mm S1=10.2 S1=10.2 mm S1=11.4 mm S1=11.8mm mm S1=11.8 S1=11.8 mm S1=10.2 mm S1=11.8 0.9 mm 0.91 0.91 0.92 0.9 0.92 0.9 0.91 0.92 Frequency (GHz) Frequency (GHz) Frequency (GHz) 0.9 0.91 0.92
0.93 0.93 0.93
0.94 0.94 0.94
0.93
0.94
Frequency Figure 5. Axial Axial(GHz) ratio. Figure 5. Figure Axial ratio. ratio. Figure 5. Axial ratio.
Figure 5. Axial ratio.
0 00
Return LossLoss (dB)(dB) Return Return ReturnLoss Loss(dB) (dB)
0-5 -5 -5
-5-10 -10 -10
-15 -10 -15 -15 -20 -15 -20 -20 -25 -20 -25 0.85 0.85 -25 0.85 -25 0.85
S11 S11 S11 S22 S22 S11 S22 S12 S12 S22 S12
S12
0.9
0.9 (GHz) Frequency Frequency 0.9 (GHz)
0.95 0.95
0.95
Frequency (GHz) 0.9 0.95 Figure 6. Simulated return loss of of(GHz) the proposed proposed antenna. antenna. Frequency Figure 6. Simulated return loss the
Figure 6. Simulated return loss of the proposed antenna. Figure 6. Simulated return loss of the proposed antenna.
Sensors 2017, 17, 1576
5 of 10
3. RFID Antenna Design A CP antenna is suitable for RFID applications as it has the ability to receive a signal from any orientation. Many techniques have been used to design CP antennas [1–9]. The dimensions of the proposed antenna are L = 76.2 mm, S1 = 11 mm, S2 = 8.168 mm, S3 = 4.5 mm and S4 = 6 mm, as shown in Figure 1. The etched stars are created using two squares with a shift angle of 45◦ . The CP ASSSMA is fed by two ports as shown in Figure 1. Each port is represented by an RFID chip. These chips have resistance and high capacitance, which are matched with the antenna by an inductive loop-matching circuit. The dimensions of the inductive loop are Ll = 25.15 mm, Lw = 6.8 mm, d = 0.2 mm, and t = 0.6 mm, as depicted in Figure 1. 4. Sensor Design A number of RFID sensor designs have been proposed recently [14–18]. Some of these use one antenna for the reference node and another for the sensor node, as in [14–17]. Although one antenna is used as both sensor and reference node in [18]. However, this application is quite complicated because it requires solar cells and a microcontroller. The antenna proposed here uses a single antenna for both the reference and the sensor nodes, and makes it simple to avoid the effect of random orientation because of its CP. The reference node and the sensor node receive the same power from the reader, and in the same environment. The patch antenna is matched with the two ports by an inductive-loop matching circuit. By changing the width or length of the loop, the imaginary part of the loop can be changed to match the imaginary part of the chip. The temperature sensor is operated depending upon the different minimum power levels required to activate the sensor and reference nodes. When the resistive sensor is changed, the matching at the sensor node will also be changed, but not as much as at the reference node, thereby changing the minimum power required to activate the sensor node. The temperature value can then be determined based on the difference in power. 5. Results and Discussion 5.1. The Passive RFID Antenna Results Using the etched slot technique, the proposed antenna is roughly 20% smaller than a conventional microstrip antenna. The asymmetric four stars on the patch increase the surface current path length more than a patch without slots. The electrical size of the antenna thus increases, while the resonance frequency shifts downward. Moreover, the four asymmetric etched stars generate CP, satisfied in a 90◦ phase difference, as shown in Figure 2. The return loss band at −3 dB for both ports covers in the US band 902–928 MHz, as shown in Figure 6, and the axial ratio bandwidth (ARBW) is about 7 MHz, as shown in Figure 7. The reader and the proposed antenna are adjusted as illustrated in Figure 8, and the distance between them is extended until the maximum reading range (25 m) is obtained, as illustrated in Figure 9. A linear polarized reader (GAO) is used in the all measurements. The proposed antenna has an acceptable gain and radiation efficiency of about 3.5 dB and 66%, respectively. Table 1 shows how the proposed antenna compares with some earlier works in terms of bandwidth, dimensions, and reading range. As indicated, the reading range of the proposed antenna is longer than those found in the literature [1,3–5,7–9,18]. However, the proposed antenna is not the best in terms of bandwidth and size.
shown in Figure 7. The reader and the proposed antenna are adjusted as illustrated in Figure 8, and the distance between them is extended until the maximum reading range (25 m) is obtained, as illustrated in Figure 9. A linear polarized reader (GAO) is used in the all measurements. The proposed antenna Sensors 2017, 17, 1576 has an acceptable gain and radiation efficiency of about 3.5 dB and 66%, respectively. 6 of 10
Axial Ratio (dB)
9
Axial Ratio
6
3
0 0.91
Sensors 2017, 17, 1576
Sensors 2017, 17, 1576
0.915
0.92 0.925 Frequency (GHz)
0.93
6 of 10
0.93
6 of 10
Figure 7. Axial ratioof of the antenna. Figure 7. Axial ratio theproposed proposed antenna.
Figure range. Figure8. 8. Reading Reading range. Maximum reading range (m)
Maximum reading range (m)
Figure 8. Reading range.
25 20
25 20 15
15 10
5 0
10 5 0
0.88
0.9
0.92
0.94
0.96
0.98
Frequency (GHz)
0.88
0.9
0.92
0.94
0.96
0.98
Figure 9. Reading range of the(GHz) proposed antenna. Frequency
Table 1 shows how the proposed antenna compares with some earlier works in terms of Figure 9. Readingrange range of of the antenna. Figure 9. Reading theproposed proposed antenna. bandwidth, dimensions, and reading range. As indicated, the reading range of the proposed antenna is longer than those found in the literature [1,3–5,7–9,18]. However, the proposed antenna is not the Table the proposed best1inshows terms ofhow bandwidth and size. antenna compares with some earlier works in terms of
bandwidth, dimensions, and reading range. As indicated, the reading range of the proposed antenna Comparing the reading range[1,3–5,7–9,18]. of the proposed antenna with previous antenna designs. is longer than Table those1.found in the literature However, the proposed antenna is not the Proposed best in terms of bandwidth and size.3 References 1 5 7 8 9 18 Design Operating 860–960 915–942 902–927 904–954 860–960 902–928 Tablefrequency 1. Comparing the reading range of758–983 the proposed antenna with previous antenna902–929 designs. (MHz) Dimensions
189.6 × 127.9
250 × 250 ×
100 × 100
70 × 70 ×
54 × 54 ×
130 × 130 ×
130 × 130 ×
Sensors 2017, 17, 1576
7 of 10
Table 1. Comparing the reading range of the proposed antenna with previous antenna designs. References
1
3
5
7
8
9
18
Proposed Design
Operating frequency (MHz)
860–960
915–942
758–983
902–927
904–954
860–960
902–928
902–929
Dimensions mm3
189.6 × 127.9 × 21.6
58.6 × 58.6 × 0.4
250 × 250 × 33.8
100 × 100 × 1.6
70 × 70 × 1.6
54 × 54 × 5.2
130 × 130 × 1.52
130 × 130 × 1.52
Reading Range (m)
8
20.5
7
4.62
4.83
8.3
7.48
25
The radar cross-section can be calculated with Equation (1) in [10]. The received power (backscattered signal) from the tag is dependent on the radar cross section, and thus the received power is directly proportional to the radar cross section value. The radar cross-section results are plotted as a function of frequency in Figure 10, and the best value of the radar cross-section is −18 dBqm at a frequency 935 MHz. P (4π )3 d4 ∆RCS = received 2 2 (1) pt Gt λ Sensors 2017, 17, 1576 7 of 10
Differential RCS (dBsqm)
-10 -20 -30 -40 -50 -60 -70 0.85
0.9
0.95
0.99
Frequency (GHz) Figure Figure 10. 10. Measured Measured differential differential radar radar cross-section cross-section as as aa function function of of frequency. frequency.
5.2. Sensor Measurements Measurements 5.2. RFID RFID Temperature Temperature Sensor The first RFID RFIDchip chipisisconnected connected parallel with a resistive sensor; together they up make up a The first in in parallel with a resistive sensor; together they make a sensor sensor node, and the second RFID chip is used as a reference node. Both chips have the same power node, and the second RFID chip is used as a reference node. Both chips have the same power sensitivity, sensitivity, −20shown dBm. As shown in Figure 5, the half-power bandwidth of the reference and the sensor −20 dBm. As in Figure 5, the half-power bandwidth of the reference and the sensor nodes are nodes are 28 MHz and 32 MHz, respectively. The reference and sensor nodes are included in the same 28 MHz and 32 MHz, respectively. The reference and sensor nodes are included in the same antenna, antenna, and so both nodes receive the same power from the reader and function under the same and so both nodes receive the same power from the reader and function under the same environmental environmental conditions. By changing the temperature or humidity, the matching resistance value conditions. By changing the temperature or humidity, the matching resistance value at the sensor node at the sensor node will change, and so the minimum power required for activating the RFID chip will will change, and so the minimum power required for activating the RFID chip will change at the same change at the same node. However, the minimum required reference node power will not change node. However, the minimum required reference node power will not change because the matching because the matching does not change. The ratio of power for activating the reference and sensor does not change. The ratio of power for activating the reference and sensor nodes can be calculated nodes can be calculated by using Equation (2) [7]. The measured minimum required power to activate by using Equation (2) [7]. The measured minimum required power to activate the tag is a function the tag is a function of frequency, as illustrated in Figure 11. Three different models of NTC of frequency, as illustrated in Figure 11. Three different models of NTC thermistors were used in the thermistors were used in the measurements: NTCLE100E3331 (330 Ω), NTCLE100E3681 (680 Ω), and measurements: NTCLE100E3331 (330 Ω), NTCLE100E3681 (680 Ω), and NTCLE100E3101JB0 (100 Ω), NTCLE100E3101JB0 (100 Ω), as the climate room was unavailable during the measurement as the climate room was unavailable during the measurement procedure. The resistive sensors were procedure. The resistive sensors were soldered individually one by one. The minimum power soldered individually one by one. The minimum power required to activate the chip at the reference required to activate the chip at the reference node and at the reference sensor were measured in each node and at the reference sensor were measured in each case, and the obtained results are presented in case, and the obtained results are presented in Figure 12. The minimum power at the reference nodes is almost the same for all cases. However, the minimum required power changes at the sensor node when the resistive sensor is modified because a mismatch occurs when the resistance changes, as shown in Figure 13. The minimum power required to activate the sensor node is 20.12 dBm, 16.18 dBm, and 11.45 dBm when the resistive sensor is 100 Ω, 330 Ω, and 680 Ω, respectively, as
Sensors 2017, 17, 1576
8 of 10
Figure 12. The minimum power at the reference nodes is almost the same for all cases. However, the minimum required power changes at the sensor node when the resistive sensor is modified because a mismatch occurs when the resistance changes, as shown in Figure 13. The minimum power required to activate the sensor node is 20.12 dBm, 16.18 dBm, and 11.45 dBm when the resistive sensor is 100 Ω, 330 Ω, and 680 Ω, respectively, as shown in Figure 13. The minimum power required for activating the tag is, thus inversely proportional to the resistance of the sensor. Considering the fabrication accuracy, the permittivity tolerance of ±0.05 and the parasitic effect of the resonance frequency shift to 935 MHz, the power difference between the reference and sensor nodes at frequency 935 MHz with different resistance values is calculated and plotted in Figure 14. Using the power curve ratio in Figure 14 to compare the minimum required power at the reference node makes it simple to determine the change in the temperature. τ Pt sensor relative Ptmin = sensor node (2) = Sensors 2017, 17, 1576 8 of 10 Pt re f erence τre f erencenode
8 of 10
Minim Powerononthethetagtag(dBm (dBm Minim umumPower ) )
Sensors 2017, 17, 1576
10 10 5 5 0 0 -5 -5
-10 -10 -15 -15 -20 0.85 -20 0.85
0.88 0.88
0.91
0.94
0.97 0.97
0.91 Frequency (GHz)0.94 Frequency (GHz)
0.99 0.99
Figure 11. Measured minimum power required for activating the RFID chips. Figure 11. Measured minimum power power required forfor activating the RFID chips.chips. Figure 11. Measured minimum required activating the RFID 30 30
Power (dBm) Power (dBm)
25 25 20 20 15 15 10 10 5 5 0 900 0 900
330 ohm 330 ohm 100 ohm 100 ohm 680 ohm 680 ohm
920 920
940
940 (GHz) Frequency Frequency (GHz)
960 960
980 980
Power (dBm) Power (dBm)
12. Measured minimumrequired required power activating the RFID at chip the reference with node FigureFigure 12. Measured minimum powerforfor activating the chip RFID at the node reference Figurechanging 12. Measured minimum required power for activating the RFID chip at the reference node resistance values. with changing resistance values. with changing resistance values. 28 28 25 25 22 22 19 19 16 16 13 13 10 900 10 900
100 ohm 100ohm ohm 330 330ohm ohm 680 680 ohm 920 920
940 940
960 960
980 980
680 ohm 5 680 ohm 0 900 920 0 900 920
940
960 960
940 (GHz) Frequency Frequency (GHz)
980 980
Figure 12.2017, Measured minimum required power for activating the RFID chip at the reference node Sensors 12. 17, 1576 9 of 10 Figure Measured minimum required power for activating the RFID chip at the reference node with changing resistance values. with changing resistance values. 28 28
Power (dBm) Power (dBm)
25 25 2222 1919 1616
100ohm ohm 100 330ohm ohm 330 680ohm ohm 680
1313 1010 900 900
920 920
940
Frequency (GHz) (GHz)
960 960
980 980
Figure13. 13.Measured Measured minimum required power activating RFID chip atatsensor the node Figure minimum required activating RFID chip thesensor sensor nodewith with Figure 13. Measured minimum requiredpower power for for activating RFID chip at the node with changing resistance values. changing resistance values. changing resistance values. 2222
Power (dBm) Power (dBm)
2020 18 18 16 16 14 14 12 12 10 10100 100
200 200
300
400
500
300 Resistance 400 (ohm) 500 Sensor Sensor Resistance (ohm)
600 600
700 700
Figure 14. Measured powerdifference difference in andand sensor nodes. Figure 14. Measured power inthe thereference reference sensor nodes. Figure 14. Measured power difference in the reference and sensor nodes.
6. Conclusions A circular-polarized asymmetric stars-shaped slotted microstrip patch antenna (CP-ASSSMP) for UHF-RFID sensor applications has been designed, fabricated, and tested. A new antenna concept for generating CP and reducing the antenna size has been presented. The CP-ASSMP uses two RFID ports as reference and sensor nodes. The minimum required power to activate the reference and resistive nodes at three different resistance values have been measured and plotted. The sensor can detect temperature changes based on the differences in the power requirements. The reading range of the proposed antenna has been compared with several other antenna types. This new antenna matches the reference and sensor nodes to a single antenna, so they receive the same power under the same environment while eliminating the need for two antennas. Moreover, the reader can read both tags at the same time with a reading range of about 25 m without internal power requirements. Other key advantages of this antenna are its simple fabrication and low cost. Finally, the measured and simulated results show a good agreement. Author Contributions: The authors worked jointly in the development of the proposed antenna. Y. Belaizi was involved in the measurement part. Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Sensors 2017, 17, 1576
10 of 10
References 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16.
17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22.
Cho, C.; Park, I.; Choo, H. Design of a Circularly Polarized Tag Antenna for Increased Reading Range. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2009, 57, 3418–3422. Gautam, A.; Kunwar, A.; Kanaujia, B. Circularly Polarized Arrowhead-Shape Slotted Microstrip Antenna. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2014, 13, 471–474. [CrossRef] Chen, H.; Sim, C.; Kuo, C. Compact Circularly Polarized Meandered-loop Antenna for UHF-Band RFID Tag. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2016, 15, 1602–1605. [CrossRef] Chen, H.; Tsia, C.; Sim, C.; Kuo, C. Circularly Polarized loop Tag Antenna for Long Reading Range RFID Applications. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2013, 12, 1460–1463. [CrossRef] Wang, Z.; Fang, S.; Fu, S.; Jia, S. Single-Fed Broadband Circularly Polarized Stacked Patch Antenna with Horizontally Meandered Strip for Universal UHF RFID Applications. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2011, 57, 1066–1073. [CrossRef] Sim, C.; Chi, C. A Slot Loaded Circularly Polarized Patch Antenna for UHF RFID Reader. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2012, 60, 4516–4521. [CrossRef] Chen, H.; Sim, C.; Kuo, S. Compact Broadband Dual Coupling- Feed Circularly polarized RFID Microstrip Tag Antenna Mountable on Metallic Surface. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2012, 60, 4516–4521. [CrossRef] Chen, H.; Kuo, S.; Sim, C.; Tsai, C. Coupling-Feed Circularly Polarized RFID Tag Antenna Mountable on Metallic Surface. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2012, 60, 2166–42174. [CrossRef] Lu, J.; Chang, B. Planar Compact Square-Ring Tag Antenna with Circular Polarization for UHF RFID Applications. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2017, 65, 432–441. [CrossRef] Fang, Z.; Jin, R.; Geng, J. Asymmetric dipole antenna suitable for active RFID tags. Electron. Lett. 2008, 44, 71–72. [CrossRef] Abdulhadi, A.; Abhari, R. Design and experimental evaluation of miniaturized monopole UHF RFID tag antennas. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2012, 11, 248–251. [CrossRef] Marrocco, G. The art of UHF RFID antenna design: Impedance matching and size-reduction techniques. IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. 2008, 50, 66–79. [CrossRef] Lu, J.; Zheng, G. Planar Broadband Tag Antenna Mounted on the Metallic Material for UHF RFID System. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2011, 10, 1405–1408. Gao, J.; Siden, J.; Nilsson, H. Printed Electromagnetic Coupler With an Embedded Moisture Sensor for Ordinary Passive RFID Tags. IEEE Electron. Device Lett. 2011, 32, 1767–1769. [CrossRef] Gao, J.; Siden, J.; Nilsson, H.; Gulliksson, M. Printed humidity sensor with memory functionality for passive RFID tags. IEEE Sens. J. 2013, 13, 1824–1834. [CrossRef] Kim, S.; Kawahara, Y.; Georgiadis, A.; Collado, A.; Tentzeris, M.M. Low-cost inkjet-printed fully passive RFID tags for calibration-free capacitive/haptic sensor applications. IEEE Sens. J. 2015, 15, 3135–3145. [CrossRef] Siden, J.; Zeng, X.; Unander, T.; Koptyug, A.; Nilsson, H.-E. Remote moisture sensing utilizing ordinary RFID tags. In Proceedings of the IEEE Sensors, Atlanta, GA, USA, 28–31 October 2007; pp. 308–311. Abdulhadi, A.; Abahari, R. Multiport UHF RFID-Tag Antenna for Enhanced Energy Harvesting of Self-Powered Wireless Sensors. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2016, 12, 801–808. [CrossRef] Marrocco, G.; Mattioni, L.; Calabrese, C. Multiport sensor RFIDs for wireless passive sensing of objects-basic theory and early results. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2008, 56, 2691–2702. [CrossRef] Caizzone, S.; Occhiuzzi, C.; Marrocco, G. Multi-chip RFID Antenna Integrating Shape-Memory Alloys for detection of Thermal Thresholds. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2011, 59, 2488–2494. [CrossRef] Marrocco, G. RFID Grids: Part I—Electromagnetic Theory. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2011, 59, 1019–1026. [CrossRef] Marrocco, G.; Caizzone, S. Multi-chip RFID Grids. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation (APSURSI), Washington, DC, USA, 3–7 July 2011; pp. 1085–1088. © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Multiport Circular Polarized RFID-Tag Antenna for UHF Sensor Applications Jamal Zaid 1, *, Abdulhadi Abdulhadi 1 , Arun Kesavan 1 , Yassin Belaizi 2 and Tayeb A. Denidni 1 1
2
*
Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique Centre Centre Énergie Matériaux Télécommunications 800, De La Gauchetière Ouest Bureau 6900, Montréal, QC H5A 1K6, Canada; [email protected] (A.A.); [email protected] (A.K.); [email protected] (T.A.D.) IES-UMR CNRS 5214 Université de Montpellier, 34095 Montpellier Cedex 5, France; [email protected] Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-438-993-9311
Received: 31 March 2017; Accepted: 30 June 2017; Published: 5 July 2017
Abstract: A circular polarized patch antenna for UHF RFID tag-based sensor applications is presented, with the circular polarization (CP) generated by a new antenna shape, an asymmetric stars shaped slotted microstrip patch antenna (CP-ASSSMP). Four stars etched on the patch allow the antenna’s size to be reduced by close to 20%. The proposed antenna is matched with two RFID chips via inductive-loop matching. The first chip is connected to a resistive sensor and acts as a sensor node, and the second is used as a reference node. The proposed antenna is used for two targets, serving as both reference and sensor simultaneously, thereby eliminating the need for a second antenna. Its reader can read the RFID chips at any orientation of the tag due to the CP. The measured reading range is about 25 m with mismatch polarization. The operating frequency band is 902–929 MHz for the two ports, which is covered by the US RFID band, and the axial-ratio bandwidth is about 7 MHz. In addition, the reader can also detect temperature, based on the minimum difference in the power required by the reference and sensor. Keywords: radio frequency identification (RFID); ultra-high frequency; reading range; sensor; passive tag antenna; multiport; circular polarization
1. Introduction UHF radio frequency identification (UHF-RFID) systems have become an attractive research topic in wireless communication networks due to the rapid expansion of RFID applications, including their use in asset tracking, security systems, remote wireless identification, purchasing, supply chain management, Internet of Things (IoT), and wireless sensor networks (WSNs) [1–9]. An RFID system consists of two parts, a reader and a tag. There are three kinds of RFID tags: passive, semi-passive, and active. Passive RFID tags have a long lifetime and are low-cost compared to active RFID tags. However, their reading range is shorter than that of active RFID tags. Basically, a passive RFID tag receives a signal from an RFID reader and then transmits a backscatter signal to the reader, allowing the reader to read the tag code. The UHF RFID frequency band is divided into sub-bands; each region has a specific frequency band such as the bands 908–914 MHz, 950–956 MHz, and 902–928 MHz utilized in South Korea, Japan, and North America, respectively. Microstrip antennas have many attractive features, including their planar structure, low cost, easy fabrication, and light weight, which have made them extremely popular and has led to their use in wireless communication networks, especially in RFID applications. RFID tags usually use a linear polarization (LP) [10–13]; however, these tags have a random orientation because they are commonly hand-held. To overcome this issue, the reader should use circular polarization (CP) to broaden the ability of the reader to receive signals from these tags independently of their orientation. In addition, Sensors 2017, 17, 1576; doi:10.3390/s17071576
www.mdpi.com/journal/sensors
Sensors 2017, 17, 1576
2 of 10
a mismatch of polarization could occur between readers and their tags, causing a loss of 3 dB from the signal, as well as reducing the reading range roughly 41% compared to a matched polarization [4]. Different techniques have been used to resolve this mismatch and to achieve CP operation for tags [1–9]. RFID-enabled multiple ports and sensor systems have become extremely attractive, offering a challenging topic for researchers due to their varied and useful applications [14–22]. To overcome the mismatch problems, a new antenna structure is proposed here, an asymmetricstar shaped slotted microstrip patch antenna (ASSSMP). This ASSSMP antenna can be etched on a patch to achieve CP operation, and it reduces the antenna size by roughly 20% compared to a conventional microstrip antenna. The proposed antenna is matched with two chips, one of which is used as a reference node and other connected to a sensor. The proposed antenna is matched with two ports, which eliminates the need for two antennas, as in [14–17]. While another work has also proposed using a single antenna that uses two ports [18], that one requires solar cells and a microcontroller, making its structure much more complicated than the one proposed here. Moreover, its patch size is larger and it is LP rather than CP. The proposed antenna has a reading range of about 25 m, achieved by using a linear-polarized reader (GAO). The proposed antenna has many desirable features, such as a simple structure, easy fabrication, low cost, compact size, is self-powered, and uses circular polarization, which means the reference node and sensor are in the same environmental conditions and receive the same power from the two reader chips at the same time and at any orientation. This aspect of similar conditions allows the use of a single antenna for the reference node and the resistive sensor, which improves the accuracy and sensitivity of the sensor system. The proposed antenna operates at the North America band (902–928 MHz), and it is matched with two tags at the center frequency of this band (915 MHz) by inductive loop matching. The sensor is operated based on the power difference between the reference node and the resistance node. This paper is organized in six sections. Section 1 is a review of RFID systems and sensors. The principles of the CP-ASSSMP are explained in the Section 2, followed by a description of the proposed antenna design in Section 3. Section 4 presents the RFID-based sensor concept, and Section 5 presents the simulated and measured results. Finally, the conclusions are presented in Section 6. 2. CP-ASSSMP Design Since RFIDs are generally used in portable or handheld systems, CP is preferable, because CP can receive a signal at any orientation (orientation diversity), thereby increasing the antenna’s ability to receive a signal and reducing multipath effects. The CP asymmetric-stars shaped slotted microstrip patch antenna (ASSSMP) was therefore designed to provide CP. Figure 1 shows the proposed antenna. The antenna is printed on an RO4003 substrate (εr = 3.55, tan (δ) = 0.0027 and thickness = 1.52 mm) and four stars are etched on the patch, as shown in Figure 1. The etched stars reduce the patch size and generate CP. They change the distribution of the current on the patch; the current increases the current path length, thereby increasing the electric size of the antenna, as well as shifting the resonance frequency downwards. Moreover, by slightly changing the size of the etched stars, two modes are created perpendicular to each other, generating CP. Figure 2 shows how much the simulated distribution surface current is changed, with four phase angles of 0◦ , 90◦ , 180◦ , and 270◦ . By using symmetric slot stars, the operating frequency is shifted downwards without CP. However, Asymmetric slot stars can achieve both a reduction in the size of the microstrip antenna and the CP. The position of the stars in the middle of each quarter and their size are defined as an exponential function as shown in Figure 3. Figure 4 shows how increasing the size of one star, (S1), shifts the resonance frequency down to a lower frequency. In addition, the axial ratio based on the electric size of the antenna increases by increasing the slot size as shown in Figure 5. From our parametric study, the best values of S1 are between 10.6 mm and 11.4 mm. Port one generates left-hand circular polarization (LHCP) and port two generates right-hand circular polarization (RHCP), as shown in Figure 2a,b, respectively. The CP ASSSMP is matched with two RFID chips by the inductive loop-matching technique; the inductive loops are designed to create conjugate matching
Sensors 2017, 17, 1576
3 of 10
(Z Antenna = Z*chip) between the antenna and the RFID chips. The RFID chip has an input impedance 2017,at 17,915 1576MHz, which is matched with the antenna by conjugating the impedance (24 3 of of (24Sensors − j190) + 10 j190), Sensors 2017, 17, 1576 3 of 10 as illustrated in Figure 6. The return losses of the reference node and the sensor node at half power j190), as illustrated in Figure 6. The return losses of the reference node and the sensor node at half coverj190), the North America RFID band MHz); and the coupling between the two as illustrated in Figure 6. The(902–929 return losses of the reference node and the sensor nodeports at halfat the power cover the North America RFID band (902–929 MHz); and the coupling between the two ports cover the North America RFID band (902–929 MHz); and the coupling between the two ports same power bandwidth is roughly −16 dB. at the same bandwidth is roughly −16 dB. at the same bandwidth is roughly −16 dB.
Figure Photo ofthe the fabricated fabricated antenna. antenna. Figure 1.Photo Photoof Figure 1.1. antenna.
(a) (a)
(b) (b) Figure 2. Simulated distribution surface current of the proposed antenna.
Figure 2. Simulated surface current distribution the proposed antenna for (a) port one and (b) port two. Figure 2. Simulated distributionofsurface current of the proposed antenna.
Sensors 2017, 17, 1576 Sensors 2017, 17, 1576 Sensors 2017, 17, 1576 Sensors 2017, 2017, 17, 17, 1576 1576 Sensors
4 of 10 4 of 10 4 of 10 of 10 10 44 of
Figure 3. The relation between the stars’ sizes. Figure The relation between the stars’ stars’ sizes. Figure3. 3.The Therelation relation between between the the sizes. Figure 3.3. the stars’sizes. sizes. Figure The relation between stars’
0
Return Loss, S22 S22 (dB)(dB) Return Loss, Return ReturnLoss, Loss,S22 S22(dB) (dB)
0 00 -10 -10 -10 -10 -20 -20 S1=10.2 mm -20 -20 S1=10.2mm mm S1=10.6 S1=10.2 mm S1=10.2 S1=10.6mm mm -30 S1=11.4 mm S1=10.6 mm -30 S1=10.6 S1=11.4mm mm S1=11.8 mm -30 S1=11.4 mm -30 S1=11.4 mm S1=11.8 mm S1=11 mm S1=11.8mm mm S1=11.8 S1=11 mm mm -40 S1=11 0.87 -40 S1=11 mm -40 0.87 -400.87 0.87
0.9 0.93 0.9 0.93 0.9 0.93 (GHz) 0.9Frequency 0.93 Frequency (GHz) (GHz) Frequency
0.96
0.96 0.96
0.96
Frequency (GHz)
Figure 4.4.Simulated return loss. loss. Figure4. Simulated return return Figure return loss. loss. Figure 4. Simulated Simulated Figure 4. Simulated return loss.
Axial Ratio (dB)(dB) Axial Ratio Axial AxialRatio Ratio(dB) (dB)
1010 10 10 88 8 8 66 6 6 4 44 4 2 22
2 00.89 00 0.89 0.89
0 0.89
S1=10.6 S1=10.6mm mm S1=10.6 mm S1=11 mm S1=11 mm S1=10.6 mm S1=11 mm S1=11.4 mm S1=11.4 mm S1=11 mm S1=11.4 mm S1=10.2mm mm S1=10.2 S1=10.2 mm S1=11.4 mm S1=11.8mm mm S1=11.8 S1=11.8 mm S1=10.2 mm S1=11.8 0.9 mm 0.91 0.91 0.92 0.9 0.92 0.9 0.91 0.92 Frequency (GHz) Frequency (GHz) Frequency (GHz) 0.9 0.91 0.92
0.93 0.93 0.93
0.94 0.94 0.94
0.93
0.94
Frequency Figure 5. Axial Axial(GHz) ratio. Figure 5. Figure Axial ratio. ratio. Figure 5. Axial ratio.
Figure 5. Axial ratio.
0 00
Return LossLoss (dB)(dB) Return Return ReturnLoss Loss(dB) (dB)
0-5 -5 -5
-5-10 -10 -10
-15 -10 -15 -15 -20 -15 -20 -20 -25 -20 -25 0.85 0.85 -25 0.85 -25 0.85
S11 S11 S11 S22 S22 S11 S22 S12 S12 S22 S12
S12
0.9
0.9 (GHz) Frequency Frequency 0.9 (GHz)
0.95 0.95
0.95
Frequency (GHz) 0.9 0.95 Figure 6. Simulated return loss of of(GHz) the proposed proposed antenna. antenna. Frequency Figure 6. Simulated return loss the
Figure 6. Simulated return loss of the proposed antenna. Figure 6. Simulated return loss of the proposed antenna.
Sensors 2017, 17, 1576
5 of 10
3. RFID Antenna Design A CP antenna is suitable for RFID applications as it has the ability to receive a signal from any orientation. Many techniques have been used to design CP antennas [1–9]. The dimensions of the proposed antenna are L = 76.2 mm, S1 = 11 mm, S2 = 8.168 mm, S3 = 4.5 mm and S4 = 6 mm, as shown in Figure 1. The etched stars are created using two squares with a shift angle of 45◦ . The CP ASSSMA is fed by two ports as shown in Figure 1. Each port is represented by an RFID chip. These chips have resistance and high capacitance, which are matched with the antenna by an inductive loop-matching circuit. The dimensions of the inductive loop are Ll = 25.15 mm, Lw = 6.8 mm, d = 0.2 mm, and t = 0.6 mm, as depicted in Figure 1. 4. Sensor Design A number of RFID sensor designs have been proposed recently [14–18]. Some of these use one antenna for the reference node and another for the sensor node, as in [14–17]. Although one antenna is used as both sensor and reference node in [18]. However, this application is quite complicated because it requires solar cells and a microcontroller. The antenna proposed here uses a single antenna for both the reference and the sensor nodes, and makes it simple to avoid the effect of random orientation because of its CP. The reference node and the sensor node receive the same power from the reader, and in the same environment. The patch antenna is matched with the two ports by an inductive-loop matching circuit. By changing the width or length of the loop, the imaginary part of the loop can be changed to match the imaginary part of the chip. The temperature sensor is operated depending upon the different minimum power levels required to activate the sensor and reference nodes. When the resistive sensor is changed, the matching at the sensor node will also be changed, but not as much as at the reference node, thereby changing the minimum power required to activate the sensor node. The temperature value can then be determined based on the difference in power. 5. Results and Discussion 5.1. The Passive RFID Antenna Results Using the etched slot technique, the proposed antenna is roughly 20% smaller than a conventional microstrip antenna. The asymmetric four stars on the patch increase the surface current path length more than a patch without slots. The electrical size of the antenna thus increases, while the resonance frequency shifts downward. Moreover, the four asymmetric etched stars generate CP, satisfied in a 90◦ phase difference, as shown in Figure 2. The return loss band at −3 dB for both ports covers in the US band 902–928 MHz, as shown in Figure 6, and the axial ratio bandwidth (ARBW) is about 7 MHz, as shown in Figure 7. The reader and the proposed antenna are adjusted as illustrated in Figure 8, and the distance between them is extended until the maximum reading range (25 m) is obtained, as illustrated in Figure 9. A linear polarized reader (GAO) is used in the all measurements. The proposed antenna has an acceptable gain and radiation efficiency of about 3.5 dB and 66%, respectively. Table 1 shows how the proposed antenna compares with some earlier works in terms of bandwidth, dimensions, and reading range. As indicated, the reading range of the proposed antenna is longer than those found in the literature [1,3–5,7–9,18]. However, the proposed antenna is not the best in terms of bandwidth and size.
shown in Figure 7. The reader and the proposed antenna are adjusted as illustrated in Figure 8, and the distance between them is extended until the maximum reading range (25 m) is obtained, as illustrated in Figure 9. A linear polarized reader (GAO) is used in the all measurements. The proposed antenna Sensors 2017, 17, 1576 has an acceptable gain and radiation efficiency of about 3.5 dB and 66%, respectively. 6 of 10
Axial Ratio (dB)
9
Axial Ratio
6
3
0 0.91
Sensors 2017, 17, 1576
Sensors 2017, 17, 1576
0.915
0.92 0.925 Frequency (GHz)
0.93
6 of 10
0.93
6 of 10
Figure 7. Axial ratioof of the antenna. Figure 7. Axial ratio theproposed proposed antenna.
Figure range. Figure8. 8. Reading Reading range. Maximum reading range (m)
Maximum reading range (m)
Figure 8. Reading range.
25 20
25 20 15
15 10
5 0
10 5 0
0.88
0.9
0.92
0.94
0.96
0.98
Frequency (GHz)
0.88
0.9
0.92
0.94
0.96
0.98
Figure 9. Reading range of the(GHz) proposed antenna. Frequency
Table 1 shows how the proposed antenna compares with some earlier works in terms of Figure 9. Readingrange range of of the antenna. Figure 9. Reading theproposed proposed antenna. bandwidth, dimensions, and reading range. As indicated, the reading range of the proposed antenna is longer than those found in the literature [1,3–5,7–9,18]. However, the proposed antenna is not the Table the proposed best1inshows terms ofhow bandwidth and size. antenna compares with some earlier works in terms of
bandwidth, dimensions, and reading range. As indicated, the reading range of the proposed antenna Comparing the reading range[1,3–5,7–9,18]. of the proposed antenna with previous antenna designs. is longer than Table those1.found in the literature However, the proposed antenna is not the Proposed best in terms of bandwidth and size.3 References 1 5 7 8 9 18 Design Operating 860–960 915–942 902–927 904–954 860–960 902–928 Tablefrequency 1. Comparing the reading range of758–983 the proposed antenna with previous antenna902–929 designs. (MHz) Dimensions
189.6 × 127.9
250 × 250 ×
100 × 100
70 × 70 ×
54 × 54 ×
130 × 130 ×
130 × 130 ×
Sensors 2017, 17, 1576
7 of 10
Table 1. Comparing the reading range of the proposed antenna with previous antenna designs. References
1
3
5
7
8
9
18
Proposed Design
Operating frequency (MHz)
860–960
915–942
758–983
902–927
904–954
860–960
902–928
902–929
Dimensions mm3
189.6 × 127.9 × 21.6
58.6 × 58.6 × 0.4
250 × 250 × 33.8
100 × 100 × 1.6
70 × 70 × 1.6
54 × 54 × 5.2
130 × 130 × 1.52
130 × 130 × 1.52
Reading Range (m)
8
20.5
7
4.62
4.83
8.3
7.48
25
The radar cross-section can be calculated with Equation (1) in [10]. The received power (backscattered signal) from the tag is dependent on the radar cross section, and thus the received power is directly proportional to the radar cross section value. The radar cross-section results are plotted as a function of frequency in Figure 10, and the best value of the radar cross-section is −18 dBqm at a frequency 935 MHz. P (4π )3 d4 ∆RCS = received 2 2 (1) pt Gt λ Sensors 2017, 17, 1576 7 of 10
Differential RCS (dBsqm)
-10 -20 -30 -40 -50 -60 -70 0.85
0.9
0.95
0.99
Frequency (GHz) Figure Figure 10. 10. Measured Measured differential differential radar radar cross-section cross-section as as aa function function of of frequency. frequency.
5.2. Sensor Measurements Measurements 5.2. RFID RFID Temperature Temperature Sensor The first RFID RFIDchip chipisisconnected connected parallel with a resistive sensor; together they up make up a The first in in parallel with a resistive sensor; together they make a sensor sensor node, and the second RFID chip is used as a reference node. Both chips have the same power node, and the second RFID chip is used as a reference node. Both chips have the same power sensitivity, sensitivity, −20shown dBm. As shown in Figure 5, the half-power bandwidth of the reference and the sensor −20 dBm. As in Figure 5, the half-power bandwidth of the reference and the sensor nodes are nodes are 28 MHz and 32 MHz, respectively. The reference and sensor nodes are included in the same 28 MHz and 32 MHz, respectively. The reference and sensor nodes are included in the same antenna, antenna, and so both nodes receive the same power from the reader and function under the same and so both nodes receive the same power from the reader and function under the same environmental environmental conditions. By changing the temperature or humidity, the matching resistance value conditions. By changing the temperature or humidity, the matching resistance value at the sensor node at the sensor node will change, and so the minimum power required for activating the RFID chip will will change, and so the minimum power required for activating the RFID chip will change at the same change at the same node. However, the minimum required reference node power will not change node. However, the minimum required reference node power will not change because the matching because the matching does not change. The ratio of power for activating the reference and sensor does not change. The ratio of power for activating the reference and sensor nodes can be calculated nodes can be calculated by using Equation (2) [7]. The measured minimum required power to activate by using Equation (2) [7]. The measured minimum required power to activate the tag is a function the tag is a function of frequency, as illustrated in Figure 11. Three different models of NTC of frequency, as illustrated in Figure 11. Three different models of NTC thermistors were used in the thermistors were used in the measurements: NTCLE100E3331 (330 Ω), NTCLE100E3681 (680 Ω), and measurements: NTCLE100E3331 (330 Ω), NTCLE100E3681 (680 Ω), and NTCLE100E3101JB0 (100 Ω), NTCLE100E3101JB0 (100 Ω), as the climate room was unavailable during the measurement as the climate room was unavailable during the measurement procedure. The resistive sensors were procedure. The resistive sensors were soldered individually one by one. The minimum power soldered individually one by one. The minimum power required to activate the chip at the reference required to activate the chip at the reference node and at the reference sensor were measured in each node and at the reference sensor were measured in each case, and the obtained results are presented in case, and the obtained results are presented in Figure 12. The minimum power at the reference nodes is almost the same for all cases. However, the minimum required power changes at the sensor node when the resistive sensor is modified because a mismatch occurs when the resistance changes, as shown in Figure 13. The minimum power required to activate the sensor node is 20.12 dBm, 16.18 dBm, and 11.45 dBm when the resistive sensor is 100 Ω, 330 Ω, and 680 Ω, respectively, as
Sensors 2017, 17, 1576
8 of 10
Figure 12. The minimum power at the reference nodes is almost the same for all cases. However, the minimum required power changes at the sensor node when the resistive sensor is modified because a mismatch occurs when the resistance changes, as shown in Figure 13. The minimum power required to activate the sensor node is 20.12 dBm, 16.18 dBm, and 11.45 dBm when the resistive sensor is 100 Ω, 330 Ω, and 680 Ω, respectively, as shown in Figure 13. The minimum power required for activating the tag is, thus inversely proportional to the resistance of the sensor. Considering the fabrication accuracy, the permittivity tolerance of ±0.05 and the parasitic effect of the resonance frequency shift to 935 MHz, the power difference between the reference and sensor nodes at frequency 935 MHz with different resistance values is calculated and plotted in Figure 14. Using the power curve ratio in Figure 14 to compare the minimum required power at the reference node makes it simple to determine the change in the temperature. τ Pt sensor relative Ptmin = sensor node (2) = Sensors 2017, 17, 1576 8 of 10 Pt re f erence τre f erencenode
8 of 10
Minim Powerononthethetagtag(dBm (dBm Minim umumPower ) )
Sensors 2017, 17, 1576
10 10 5 5 0 0 -5 -5
-10 -10 -15 -15 -20 0.85 -20 0.85
0.88 0.88
0.91
0.94
0.97 0.97
0.91 Frequency (GHz)0.94 Frequency (GHz)
0.99 0.99
Figure 11. Measured minimum power required for activating the RFID chips. Figure 11. Measured minimum power power required forfor activating the RFID chips.chips. Figure 11. Measured minimum required activating the RFID 30 30
Power (dBm) Power (dBm)
25 25 20 20 15 15 10 10 5 5 0 900 0 900
330 ohm 330 ohm 100 ohm 100 ohm 680 ohm 680 ohm
920 920
940
940 (GHz) Frequency Frequency (GHz)
960 960
980 980
Power (dBm) Power (dBm)
12. Measured minimumrequired required power activating the RFID at chip the reference with node FigureFigure 12. Measured minimum powerforfor activating the chip RFID at the node reference Figurechanging 12. Measured minimum required power for activating the RFID chip at the reference node resistance values. with changing resistance values. with changing resistance values. 28 28 25 25 22 22 19 19 16 16 13 13 10 900 10 900
100 ohm 100ohm ohm 330 330ohm ohm 680 680 ohm 920 920
940 940
960 960
980 980
680 ohm 5 680 ohm 0 900 920 0 900 920
940
960 960
940 (GHz) Frequency Frequency (GHz)
980 980
Figure 12.2017, Measured minimum required power for activating the RFID chip at the reference node Sensors 12. 17, 1576 9 of 10 Figure Measured minimum required power for activating the RFID chip at the reference node with changing resistance values. with changing resistance values. 28 28
Power (dBm) Power (dBm)
25 25 2222 1919 1616
100ohm ohm 100 330ohm ohm 330 680ohm ohm 680
1313 1010 900 900
920 920
940
Frequency (GHz) (GHz)
960 960
980 980
Figure13. 13.Measured Measured minimum required power activating RFID chip atatsensor the node Figure minimum required activating RFID chip thesensor sensor nodewith with Figure 13. Measured minimum requiredpower power for for activating RFID chip at the node with changing resistance values. changing resistance values. changing resistance values. 2222
Power (dBm) Power (dBm)
2020 18 18 16 16 14 14 12 12 10 10100 100
200 200
300
400
500
300 Resistance 400 (ohm) 500 Sensor Sensor Resistance (ohm)
600 600
700 700
Figure 14. Measured powerdifference difference in andand sensor nodes. Figure 14. Measured power inthe thereference reference sensor nodes. Figure 14. Measured power difference in the reference and sensor nodes.
6. Conclusions A circular-polarized asymmetric stars-shaped slotted microstrip patch antenna (CP-ASSSMP) for UHF-RFID sensor applications has been designed, fabricated, and tested. A new antenna concept for generating CP and reducing the antenna size has been presented. The CP-ASSMP uses two RFID ports as reference and sensor nodes. The minimum required power to activate the reference and resistive nodes at three different resistance values have been measured and plotted. The sensor can detect temperature changes based on the differences in the power requirements. The reading range of the proposed antenna has been compared with several other antenna types. This new antenna matches the reference and sensor nodes to a single antenna, so they receive the same power under the same environment while eliminating the need for two antennas. Moreover, the reader can read both tags at the same time with a reading range of about 25 m without internal power requirements. Other key advantages of this antenna are its simple fabrication and low cost. Finally, the measured and simulated results show a good agreement. Author Contributions: The authors worked jointly in the development of the proposed antenna. Y. Belaizi was involved in the measurement part. Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Sensors 2017, 17, 1576
10 of 10
References 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16.
17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22.
Cho, C.; Park, I.; Choo, H. Design of a Circularly Polarized Tag Antenna for Increased Reading Range. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2009, 57, 3418–3422. Gautam, A.; Kunwar, A.; Kanaujia, B. Circularly Polarized Arrowhead-Shape Slotted Microstrip Antenna. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2014, 13, 471–474. [CrossRef] Chen, H.; Sim, C.; Kuo, C. Compact Circularly Polarized Meandered-loop Antenna for UHF-Band RFID Tag. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2016, 15, 1602–1605. [CrossRef] Chen, H.; Tsia, C.; Sim, C.; Kuo, C. Circularly Polarized loop Tag Antenna for Long Reading Range RFID Applications. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2013, 12, 1460–1463. [CrossRef] Wang, Z.; Fang, S.; Fu, S.; Jia, S. Single-Fed Broadband Circularly Polarized Stacked Patch Antenna with Horizontally Meandered Strip for Universal UHF RFID Applications. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2011, 57, 1066–1073. [CrossRef] Sim, C.; Chi, C. A Slot Loaded Circularly Polarized Patch Antenna for UHF RFID Reader. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2012, 60, 4516–4521. [CrossRef] Chen, H.; Sim, C.; Kuo, S. Compact Broadband Dual Coupling- Feed Circularly polarized RFID Microstrip Tag Antenna Mountable on Metallic Surface. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2012, 60, 4516–4521. [CrossRef] Chen, H.; Kuo, S.; Sim, C.; Tsai, C. Coupling-Feed Circularly Polarized RFID Tag Antenna Mountable on Metallic Surface. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2012, 60, 2166–42174. [CrossRef] Lu, J.; Chang, B. Planar Compact Square-Ring Tag Antenna with Circular Polarization for UHF RFID Applications. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2017, 65, 432–441. [CrossRef] Fang, Z.; Jin, R.; Geng, J. Asymmetric dipole antenna suitable for active RFID tags. Electron. Lett. 2008, 44, 71–72. [CrossRef] Abdulhadi, A.; Abhari, R. Design and experimental evaluation of miniaturized monopole UHF RFID tag antennas. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2012, 11, 248–251. [CrossRef] Marrocco, G. The art of UHF RFID antenna design: Impedance matching and size-reduction techniques. IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. 2008, 50, 66–79. [CrossRef] Lu, J.; Zheng, G. Planar Broadband Tag Antenna Mounted on the Metallic Material for UHF RFID System. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2011, 10, 1405–1408. Gao, J.; Siden, J.; Nilsson, H. Printed Electromagnetic Coupler With an Embedded Moisture Sensor for Ordinary Passive RFID Tags. IEEE Electron. Device Lett. 2011, 32, 1767–1769. [CrossRef] Gao, J.; Siden, J.; Nilsson, H.; Gulliksson, M. Printed humidity sensor with memory functionality for passive RFID tags. IEEE Sens. J. 2013, 13, 1824–1834. [CrossRef] Kim, S.; Kawahara, Y.; Georgiadis, A.; Collado, A.; Tentzeris, M.M. Low-cost inkjet-printed fully passive RFID tags for calibration-free capacitive/haptic sensor applications. IEEE Sens. J. 2015, 15, 3135–3145. [CrossRef] Siden, J.; Zeng, X.; Unander, T.; Koptyug, A.; Nilsson, H.-E. Remote moisture sensing utilizing ordinary RFID tags. In Proceedings of the IEEE Sensors, Atlanta, GA, USA, 28–31 October 2007; pp. 308–311. Abdulhadi, A.; Abahari, R. Multiport UHF RFID-Tag Antenna for Enhanced Energy Harvesting of Self-Powered Wireless Sensors. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2016, 12, 801–808. [CrossRef] Marrocco, G.; Mattioni, L.; Calabrese, C. Multiport sensor RFIDs for wireless passive sensing of objects-basic theory and early results. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2008, 56, 2691–2702. [CrossRef] Caizzone, S.; Occhiuzzi, C.; Marrocco, G. Multi-chip RFID Antenna Integrating Shape-Memory Alloys for detection of Thermal Thresholds. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2011, 59, 2488–2494. [CrossRef] Marrocco, G. RFID Grids: Part I—Electromagnetic Theory. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2011, 59, 1019–1026. [CrossRef] Marrocco, G.; Caizzone, S. Multi-chip RFID Grids. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation (APSURSI), Washington, DC, USA, 3–7 July 2011; pp. 1085–1088. © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
